Myofibrillogenesis requires the correct folding and assembly of sarcomeric proteins into highly organized sarcomeres. Heat shock protein 90α1 (Hsp90α1) has been implicated as a myosin chaperone that plays a key role in myofibrillogenesis. Knockdown or mutation of hsp90α1 resulted in complete disorganization of thick and thin filaments and M- and Z-line structures. It is not clear whether the disorganization of these sarcomeric structures is due to a direct effect from loss of Hsp90α1 function or indirectly through the disorganization of myosin thick filaments.
In this study, we carried out a loss-of-function analysis of myosin thick filaments via gene-specific knockdown or using a myosin ATPase inhibitor BTS (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide) in zebrafish embryos. We demonstrated that knockdown of myosin heavy chain 1 (myhc1) resulted in sarcomeric defects in the thick and thin filaments and defective alignment of Z-lines. Similarly, treating zebrafish embryos with BTS disrupted thick and thin filament organization, with little effect on the M- and Z-lines. In contrast, loss of Hsp90α1 function completely disrupted all sarcomeric structures including both thick and thin filaments as well as the M- and Z-lines.
Together, these studies indicate that the hsp90α1 mutant phenotype is not simply due to disruption of myosin folding and assembly, suggesting that Hsp90α1 may play a role in the assembly and organization of other sarcomeric structures.
Citation:Codina M, Li J, Gutiérrez J, Kao JPY, Du SJ (2010) Loss of Smyhc1 or Hsp90α1 Function Results in Different Effects on Myofibril Organization in Skeletal Muscles of Zebrafish Embryos. PLoS ONE 5(1): e8416. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008416
Editor: Joy Sturtevant, Louisiana State University, United States of America
Received: August 7, 2009; Accepted: November 22, 2009; Published: January 1, 2010
Copyright: © 2010 Codina et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding:This research was supported by research grant No IS-3703-05 from BARD, the United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, and an intercenter collaboration grant (Kao-Du) from University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Muscle fibers are composed of myofibrils, one of the most highly ordered macromolecular assemblies in cells. Each myofibril is made up of repetitive organized structures called sarcomeres, the basic contractile unit in skeletal and cardiac muscles. The sarcomere is composed of myosin (thick) and actin (thin) filaments. Myosin and actin proteins are assembled to form the highly organized thick and thin filaments with the help of titin, nebulin, and other structural proteins in the Z-disks and M-bands , , , , , . The regulatory mechanisms that lead to the formation of this highly organized sarcomeric structure have been extensively investigated in cell culture in vitro; however, the regulatory mechanism is not yet completely understood during muscle development in vivo , , .
Genetic studies and biochemical analyses have shown that chaperone-mediated myosin folding and assembly is an integral part of myofibrillogenesis during muscle development. Mutations of Caenorhabditis elegans UNC-45, a myosin chaperone, result in paralyzed animals with severe myofibril defects in body wall muscles , , , , . Recent studies demonstrated that heat shock protein 90α1 (Hsp90α1) which binds to UNC-45 and forms a complex with newly synthesized myosin proteins also plays a vital role in myosin folding and myofibril assembly , , , , . Hsp90α1 is specifically expressed in developing somites and skeletal muscles of zebrafish embryos , . Knockdown or mutation of hsp90α1 resulted in paralyzed zebrafish embryos with defective skeletal muscle contraction , , . Assembly of thick and thin filaments, as well as the M- and Z-lines, was completely disrupted in skeletal muscles of hsp90α1 knockdown or mutant zebrafish embryos , . It is not clear whether the myofibril defects in other sarcomeric structures of hsp90α1 knockdown embryos were caused directly from hsp90α1 knockdown or indirectly through the effect of disorganization of myosin thick filaments.
In this study, we directly knocked down myosin heavy chain expression in slow muscles of zebrafish embryos and compared the muscle phenotypes with that of the hsp90α1 mutant (slotu44c) that carries a nonsense mutation in the C-terminal region. We demonstrated that knockdown of smyhc1 had a different effect than hsp90α1 mutation on sarcomere assembly. Unlike hsp90α1 mutation which completely disrupted all sarcomeric structures, knockdown of myosin resulted in a restricted sarcomeric defect in thick and thin filaments. This was further confirmed by treating zebrafish embryos with BTS (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide), a specific inhibitor for myosin ATPase and myosin-actin interaction in zebrafish embryos. Together, these studies demonstrated loss of myosin function resulted in a different effect than hsp90α1 mutation on myofibril organization, suggesting the hsp90α1 mutant phenotype is not simply due to disruption of myosin folding and assembly.
1. Knockdown of smyhc1 Expression Resulted in Paralyzed Zebrafish Embryos with Defective Thick Filament Organization in Slow Muscles
Zebrafish embryonic muscles can be divided into two major types, slow and fast, based on the expression of myosin heavy chain (MyHC). Smyhc1 represents the first and primary MyHC expressed in slow muscles of zebrafish embryos that can be labeled specifically with F59 monoclonal antibody , , . In addition, two other myhc genes, smyhc2 and smyhc3, are also expressed in a small subset of zebrafish slow muscles at the dorsal, ventral and myoseptum regions of the myotome in late stage embryos , , . To determine the myosin knockdown phenotype and compare it with that of hsp90α1 mutation, we knocked down smyhc1 expression using a smyhc1-specific translational morpholino (ATG-MO) in zebrafish embryos (Fig. 1). The ATG-MO was targeted to the flanking sequence of the smyhc1 ATG start codon. It shares 50–70% identity with the corresponding sequences in zebrafish smyhc2, smyhc3, fmyhc2 and fmyhc4.
A. Western blot analysis shows the effect of smyhc1-MO on the expression of the myosin heavy chain in slow muscles (F59) at 24 and 48 hpf. Anti-γ-tubulin was used as a loading control. B, C. Anti-MyHC antibody (F59) staining shows myosin expression in trunk slow muscles of control (B), or smyhc1 knockdown (C) embryos at 48 hpf. Myosin expression was significantly knocked down in slow muscles. However, myosin expression could be detected in myofibers in the dorsal and myoseptum region of the myotome (arrows) that express smyhc2 and smyhc3. D, E. F59 antibody staining on cross-sections shows MyHC expression in slow muscles (arrows) of control (D) or smyhc1-ATG-MO injected embryos (E) at 48 hpf. F, G. MF20 antibody staining shows MyHC expression in fast muscles of control (F) or smyhc1-ATG-MO (G) injected embryos at 48 hpf. Scale bars = 25 µm in B; 75 µm in D and F.
Western blot analyses showed a significant reduction of Smyhc1 protein levels in smyhc1 ATG-MO injected zebrafish embryos (Fig. 1A). Immunostaining of whole mount embryos confirmed that myosin expression was missing or greatly reduced in slow muscles of the knockdown zebrafish embryos (Fig. 1C, E). However, expression of other MyHCs in fast muscles was not affected (Fig. 1G). Moreover, myosin expression in a subset of slow muscles in the dorsal and myoseptum regions of the myotome that express smyhc2 and smyhc3 also appeared normal (Fig. 1C). Together, these data indicate that the smyhc1 ATG-MO was specific in knocking down the expression of smyhc1 in slow muscles of zebrafish embryos.
To determine whether knockdown of smyhc1 affects slow muscle development, we analyzed myod expression by in situ hybridization. Compared with controls (Fig. 2A), a similar pattern of myod expression was observed in smyhc1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 2B). Two rows of myod-expressing adaxial cells that give rise to slow muscles were clearly detected in the smyhc1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 2B), confirming that knockdown of smyhc1 did not alter the initial formation of slow muscle precursors in zebrafish embryos. To determine whether slow muscle differentiation was affected in smyhc1 knockdown embryos, we analyzed the expression of slow muscle-specific troponin C in the knockdown embryos. The results showed that smyhc1 knockdown did not affect the expression of slow-specific troponin C in zebrafish embryos at 24 hpf (Fig. 2E, F). Together, these data confirmed that knockdown of smyhc1 did not affect the formation of slow muscles.
A and B. In situ hybridization shows myod expression in control (A) or smyhc1-ATG-MO (B) injected embryos at 14 hpf. Adaxial cells that give rise to slow muscles are indicated by arrows. C–F. In situ hybridization shows slow-specific troponin C expression in control (C, D) or smyhc1-ATG-MO (E, F) injected embryos at 24 hpf. D and F are cross sections of C and E, respectively. Arrows in D and F indicate slow muscles.
To determine whether knockdown of smyhc1 affected muscle function, the smyhc1 ATG-MO injected embryos were examined morphologically following the smyhc1 ATG-MO injection. Although the injected embryos appeared morphologically normal compared with control (Fig. 3), smyhc1 knockdown embryos were paralyzed at 24 hpf, a phenotype very similar to the zebrafish slotu44c mutant carrying a nonsense mutation in the hsp90α1 gene .
Morphological comparison of control (C, D) or smyhc1-ATG-MO injected (E, F) embryos at 48 hpf. Scale bars = 30µm in A, 100 µm in C and D.
To determine whether knockdown of smyhc1 expression resulted in defective thick filament organization, we examined the organization of myosin thick filaments in smyhc1 knockdown embryos by immunostaining with the F59 and F310 antibodies that label myosin in slow and fast muscles, respectively. Compared with slotu44c mutant zebrafish embryos (Fig. 4C), knockdown of smyhc1 expression resulted in no organized thick filaments in slow muscles of zebrafish embryos (Fig. 4B). This was expected considering the smyhc1 is specifically expressed in slow muscles. However, knockdown of smyhc1 had no effect on thick filament organization in fast muscles (Fig. 4E). This was in contrast to slotu44c mutant that has muscle defects in both slow and fast muscles (Fig. 4F). Together, these data indicate that Smyhc1 is required for thick filament assembly in slow muscles.
A–C. Anti-MyHC antibody (F59) staining shows the organization of thick filaments in trunk slow muscles of control (A), smyhc1 knockdown (B), or slotu44c mutant (C) embryos at 48 hpf. D–F. Anti-MLC antibody (F310) staining shows the organization of thick filaments in trunk fast muscles of control (D), smyhc1 knockdown (E), or slotu44c mutant (F) embryos at 72 hpf. Note, fast fibers project with a 30 degree angle with respect to the axial structure, whereas slow fibers project in parallel to the axial structure. G, H. Anti-MyHC antibody (F59) staining shows the rescue of thick filaments in smyhc1 knockdown zebrafish embryos co-injected with ef1a:smyhc1 DNA construct (G), or ATG-MO alone (H). Scale bar = 25 µm in A, 10 µm in G.
To confirm the specificity of phenotype, we performed a rescue experiment by co-injecting a smyhc1 expression DNA construct with the smyhc1 ATG-MO into zebrafish embryos. The ATG-MO was not able to knock down the expression of the DNA construct because its 5′ UTR sequence targeted by the ATG-MO has been replaced with a 5′ UTR sequence from the b-globin gene. The results showed that transient expression of the smyhc1 DNA construct could rescue the thick filament defect (Fig. 4G). The rescued myofibers appeared in a mosaic fashion, consistent with the typical mosaic pattern of gene expression from DNA injection.
2. Knockdown of smyhc1 Expression Disrupted Organization of Thin Filaments in Slow Muscles
During myofibrillogenesis, actin thin filaments align around myosin thick filaments in a hexagonal arrangement to form the highly ordered sarcomeric structure. It has been suggested that interaction with myosin is critical for α-actin thin filament organization. To test whether thin filament organization was affected in smyhc1 knockdown embryos, we examined thin filaments in smyhc1ATG-MO injected embryos by immunostaining with anti-α-actin antibody. Compared with the control-MO injected embryos (Fig. 5A), smyhc1 knockdown embryos showed disorganized thin filaments in slow muscles (Fig. 5B). The thin filament defects were very similar to that observed in hsp90α1 mutant zebrafish embryos (Fig. 5C). As expected, the thin filament defects were specifically restricted to slow muscles in smyhc1 knockdown embryos. Thin filaments in fast muscles appeared normal in smyhc1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 5E). This differs from the slotu44c mutant, which exhibited thin filament defects in both slow and fast muscles (Fig. 5F). Together, these data suggest that disruption of myosin thick filaments could result in defective organization of thin filaments in muscle cells.
A–C. Anti-α−actin antibody staining shows the organization of thin filaments in slow muscles of control (A), smyhc1 knockdown (B), or slotu44c mutant (C) embryos at 48 hpf. D, F. Anti-α−actin antibody staining shows the organization of thin filaments in fast muscles of control (D), smyhc1 knockdown (E), or slotu44c mutant (F) embryos at 72 hpf. Scale bar = 25 µm in A.
3. Inhibition of Myosin Function by BTS Resulted in Defective Thick and Thin Filaments in Skeletal Muscles of Zebrafish Embryos
It has been shown that inhibition of myosin ATPase activity by BTS (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide) blocks thick and thin filament assembly in cultured cells in vitro , . Moreover, treating zebrafish embryos with BTS induce paralysis in fish embryos . To determine whether inhibiting myosin function by BTS affects myofibril assembly and muscle contraction in zebrafish embryos in vivo, we incubated zebrafish embryos with BTS starting at 12 hpf, a developmental stage correlating with myofibrillogenesis. A clear dose-dependent effect was observed on inhibition of muscle contraction in BTS-treated zebrafish embryos (Table 1). BTS could effectively block muscle contraction at a dose of 20 µM. BTS-treated embryos appeared morphologically normal except the lack of muscle contraction (Fig. 6C). A clear edema and weak cardiac muscle contraction were also detected in BTS treated embryos at 120 hpf (Fig. 6D).
A–D. Morphological comparison of control (A, B) or BTS-treated (C, D) embryos at 48 hpf (A, C) and 120 hpf (B, D). Compared with control (B), BTS-treated embryos (D) showed a clear edema (indicated by the arrow) at 120 hpf. E and F. Anti-MyHC antibody (F59) staining shows the organization of thick filaments in slow muscles of control (E) or BTS-treated (F) embryos at 60 hpf. G and H. Anti-MLC antibody (F310) staining shows the organization of thick filaments in fast muscles of control (G) or BTS-treated (H) embryos at 72 hpf. I and J. Anti-α-actin antibody staining shows the organization of thin filaments in slow muscles of control (I) or BTS-treated (J) embryos at 60 hpf. K and L. Anti-α-actin antibody staining shows the organization of thin filaments in fast muscles of control (K) or BTS-treated (L) embryos at 72 hpf. Scale bars = 100 µm in A and B, 25 µm in E.
The myofibril organization of thick and thin filament was analyzed in BTS-treated zebrafish embryos by immunostaining with anti-MyHC (F59), and anti-α-actin antibodies. Unlike the ATG-MO injection, BTS treatment did not significantly reduced the levels of myosin and actin expression in muscle cells (Fig. 6F, J). However, thick and thin filament organization was significantly disrupted in both slow and fast muscles of BTS-treated embryos (Fig. 6F, H, J, L). In contrast, incubation with DMSO, used in making BTS solution, had no effect on thick and thin filament organization (Fig. 6E, G, I, K), confirming that the muscle defects were BTS-specific. Together, these data indicate a critical role for myosin ATPase activity in myosin thick filament assembly and organization. In addition, the myosin-actin interaction is required for thin filament assembly in skeletal muscles.
4. Blocking Myosin Function and hsp90α1 Mutation Had Different Effects on Organization of Z- and M-Lines in Skeletal Muscles of Zebrafish Embryos
To determine whether disruption of myosin thick filaments could affect the organization of other sarcomeric structures in skeletal muscles, we analyzed the M- and Z-line structures in smyhc1 knockdown and BTS-treated zebrafish embryos, and compared them with that from the hsp90α1 mutation. Immunostaining was performed with anti-myomesin and anti-α-actinin antibodies that specifically label the M- or Z-lines, respectively. Compared with control (Fig. 7A, C), Z-line organization was clearly altered in slow muscles of smyhc1 knockdown embryos (Fig. 7B, D). Although Z line-like structures were clearly detected in the smyhc1 knockdown embryos, they failed to align correctly to form the straight Z-line (Fig. 7D). As expected, the Z-line defect was restricted to slow muscles. The Z-lines appeared normal in fast muscles (Fig. 7B, D). However, compared with smyhc1 knockdown, the Z-line organization appeared less affected in BTS-treated embryos, although the myofibers appeared to be twisted (Fig. 7E, G). In contrast, the Z-line organization was significantly affected in hsp90α1 mutant embryos (Fig. 7F, H). Very few organized Z-lines could be observed, although Z-bodies could be clearly detected at a higher magnification (Fig. 7H). Together, these data indicate that compared with the loss of myosin function, hsp90α1 mutation has a strong effect on Z-line organization.
Anti-α-actinin antibody staining shows the Z-disk organization in control (A, C), smyhc1 knockdown (B, D), BTS-treated (E, G), or slotu44c mutant (F, H) embryos at 60 hpf. C, D, G and H are high magnifications of A (control), B (smyhc1 knockdown), E (BTS treated) and F (slotu44c mutant), respectively. Scale bar = 25 µm in A, B; 20 µm in E, F; 4 µm in C, D, G, H.
To determine whether M-lines were affected by thick filament disruption in smyhc1 knockdown, BTS-treated or slotu44c mutant embryos, we analyzed M-line organization by immunostaining using an anti-myomesin antibody. The data showed a striking difference in myomesin staining among the three different groups of embryos. Although the organization of M-lines appeared normal in smyhc1 knockdown and BTS-treated embryos (Fig. 8B, C), the M-line localization of myomesin was completely abolished in hsp90α1 mutant embryos (Fig. 8D). Very little myomesin staining could be detected in the hsp90α1 mutant embryos (Fig. 8D), suggesting that the hsp90a1 mutation could result in a dramatic disruption of M-line organization in skeletal muscles. Collectively, these data indicate that defective thick filament assembly could not account for all myofibril defects in hsp90a1 mutant embryos, suggesting that Hsp90α1 may play additional roles in the assembly and organization of other sarcomeric structures, such as M-lines in skeletal muscles.
In this study, we analyzed the role of myosin in myofibril assembly and compared it with that of hsp90α1 mutant in zebrafish embryos. We demonstrated that knockdown of smyhc1 expression completely disrupted the organization of thick and thin filaments in skeletal muscles of zebrafish embryos. Similarly, inhibiting myosin ATPase with BTS also resulted in disruption of thick and thin filament organization. In contrast, Hsp90α1 mutation completely disorupted the myofibril organization of all key sarcomeric structures including thick and thin filaments as well as Z- and M-lines. Together, these studies indicate that the myosin chaperone Hsp90α1 is not only important for myosin folding and thick filament assembly, but it may also play additional roles in the organization of other sarcomeric structures such as the M- and Z-lines.
Smyhc1 Is Required for Thick and Thin Filament Organization in Slow Muscles of Zebrafish Embryos
Zebrafish muscle fibers can be broadly classified into two major types, slow and fast, based on the different contraction speeds, metabolic activities and the expression of MyHC proteins. It has been postulated that zebrafish slow muscles express only a single MyHC isotype , . Recent studies indicate that zebrafish slow muscles express at least three types of MyHC isoforms during development . However, Smyhc1 represents the first and predominant MyHC isotype expressed in zebrafish embryonic slow muscles . By using the gene-specific knockdown approach, we demonstrated that Smyhc1 plays a key role in thick filament formation in slow muscles. Knockdown of smyhc1 expression completely disrupted the organized assembly of thick filaments. It had little effect on the development of fast muscles, consistent with the temporal and spatial patterns of smyhc1 expression in zebrafish embryos.
The smyhc1 knockdown phenotype clearly indicates a critical role for myosin thick filaments in the organized assembly of thin filaments in skeletal muscles. This is consistent with previous studies showing that myosin filaments function as an accelerator for actin polymerization in vitro, and actin-myosin interaction plays a vital role in myofibril assembly of thin filaments in sarcomeres . This is also consistent with studies in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster that established a clear correlation between myhc gene mutation and skeletal muscle disease , . In addition, myhc mutation disrupts myofibrillar assembly of thick filament in the indirect flight muscle .
In contrast to the thick and thin filaments, we showed that knockdown of smyhc1 expression affected the Z-line organization. However, formation of Z bodies appeared normal, suggesting that the initial formation of Z bodies could occur independently of thick and thin filaments. These data are consistent with our recent studies in zebrafish showing that knockdown of skNAC significantly disrupted the assembly of thick and thin filaments, but with a weak effect on the M- and Z-lines . Similar conclusions have been previously reported by Funatsu and colleagues demonstrating that the basic framework of M- and Z-line structures was not significantly affected when both thick and thin filaments were removed in vitro , . Collectively, these studies support the idea that the basic framework of the sarcomere consisting of the Z-disks and M-bands is established independently prior to the attachment of thick and thin filaments , , .
BTS Disrupts Thick and Thin Filament Organization in Skeletal Muscles
In this study, we demonstrated that treating zebrafish embryos with BTS, a specific myosin ATPase inhibitor, disrupted myofibril organization in both slow and fast muscles of zebrafish embryos. Results from our in vivo studies are consistent with previous findings that BTS suppresses the formation of thick and thin filaments in muscle cells in culture , , . It should be noted that inhibiting myosin function by BTS exhibited a specific effect on the thick and thin filament organization without much effect on the M- and Z-lines. It is expected that BTS treatment may have a weaker effect compared with the myosin specific knockdown. This is because knockdown blocked the expression of smyhc1, whereas BTS does not block the expression of the myosin protein. Rather, it interferes with its ATPase activity and interaction with a-actin. Because inhibition of myosin function by BTS is a dose-dependent and kinetic process, we expect that some of the myosin protein may not be completely inhibited by BTS and thus resulted in a weaker phenotype compared with smyhc1 knockdown.
Data from our studies provide new evidence that the ATPase activity of the myosin head is required for myofibril assembly. Cheung and collaborators have shown that BTS binds to myosin head domain and inhibits myosin S1 ATPase activity, leading to dissociation of myosin from actin in the presence of ADP , . Previous work in C. elegans also attested to an important function for the myosin head in thick filament assembly . This study showed that mutations in functionally important domains of the myosin head, including the binding sites for ATP and actin, strongly interfered with assembly of MyHC into thick filaments in body wall muscles . Thus, although the myosin rod is capable of assembly in vitro into thick filament-like structures , a functional myosin head is required in vivo for normal filament formation. However, it should be noted that in contrast to data from C. elegans and our present study in zebrafish, a prior report suggests that assembly of thick filaments and myofibrils occurs in the absence of the myosin head in transgenic D. melanogaster expressing the headless myosin rod in indirect flight muscles . The cause of the discrepancy is not clear. It could be due to the different model systems used in these studies, or the different approaches used to inactivate or remove the myosin head domain.
Loss of Myosin Function and hsp90α1 Mutation Have Different Effects on Myofibril Organization
We have demonstrated that loss of myosin function produced a distinct phenotype than hsp90α1 mutation on myofibril assembly in zebrafish embryos. Although loss of myosin or hsp90α1 function resulted in similar defects in thick and thin filaments, and to certain extent of the Z-line organization, they showed different phenotypes on the M-lines. Loss of myosin function had little effect on the structural organization of M-lines. In contrast, hsp90α1 mutation completely disrupted myomesin expression and M-line formation in skeletal muscles. This is consistent with the EM characterization of muscle defects in hsp90α1 mutant embryos . It remains to be determined whether myomesin could represent a potential Hsp90α1 client protein. It has been shown that Hsp90 chaperone has numerous client proteins, and plays a key role in their folding, assembly, and activation . Therefore, in addition to myosin, Hsp90α1 may play a vital role in folding and assembly of other sarcomeric proteins, such as myomesin, during myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscles.
Materials and Methods
Mature zebrafish were raised at the zebrafish facility of the Aquaculture Research Center, Center of Marine Biotechnology. The fish were maintained at 28°C with a photoperiod of 14h light and 10h dark, in 8-gallon aquaria supplied with freshwater and aeration. The slotu44c mutant zebrafish line was obtained from Tubingen Zebrafish Stock Center . The slotu44c mutant carries a nonsense mutation in the hsp90α1 gene resulting in truncated molecules missing the C-terminal domain, which is important for both homo- and heterodimerization , .
Synthesis of Morpholino Antisense Oligos
Morpholino antisense oligos were synthesized by Gene Tools (Corvalis, OR). The smhyc1 translation blocker (ATG-MO) was targeted to the sequence flanking the ATG start codon. The control-MO was the standard control oligo purchased from Gene Tools.
smyhc1 ATG-MO: 5′- TCTAAAGTTTTACCCACTGCGGCAA- 3′.
Microinjection in Zebrafish Embryos
Morpholino antisense oligos were dissolved in 1× Danieau buffer to a final concentration of 0.5 mM or 1 mM. Approximately 1–2 nl (5 ng or 10 ng) was injected into each zebrafish embryo at the 1 or 2 cell stages.
Analysis of Protein Expression by Western Blot
Chorions were removed from control, or MO-injected embryos (50 embryos for each group) at 24 and 48 hpf. Yolk sacs were removed by gently pipeting embryos through a glass pipet in 1 ml of PBS buffer. The embryos were collected by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 20 seconds. The pellet of embryos was dissolved in 150 µl of 2× SDS loading buffer (3 µl for each embryo), and homogenized with a 21# needle/syringe. 2 µl of PMSF was added to reduce the bubbles. The sample was boiled for 3 min at 100C. 20 µl of protein sample was analyzed on a 7.5% SDS PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore) and immunostaining was carried out using anti-MHC (F59; DSHB), and anti-γ-tubulin (T6557; Sigma) antibodies.
Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization
The cDNA of zebrafish slow-specific troponin C (stnnc; NM_001002085) was cloned from zebrafish embryos (24 hpf) by RT-PCR using the First-strand cDNA synthesis kit and followed by an advantage-2 DNA polymerase (Clontech). Stnnc-p1 and stnnc-p2 primers were used in the PCR reaction [stnnc-p1, 5′-aatgatgtatataaagcagcggtg-3′; stnnc-p2, 5′-tttactcgacacccttcataaagt-3′]. The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega) and sequenced. The resulting plasmids were named pGEM-stnnc.
Whole mount in situ hybridization was carried out using digoxigenin-labeled antisense probe in smyhc1 knockdown and control embryos at 24 hpf. Plasmid pGEM-stnnc was digested with Spe I and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase to synthesize the digoxigenin-labled antisense RNA probe.
Construction of ef1α:smyhc1 Gene Construct and Rescue Experiment
To generate a DNA construct that can be used to rescue the smyhc1 knockdown phenotype in myofibers of zebrafish embryos, we constructed the ef1α:smyhc1 plasmid that contains the zebrafish elongation factor 1α (ef1α) promoter and the full length smyhc1 cDNA coding sequence. Briefly the full length smyhc1 cDNA of was amplified by RT-PCR using zebrafish embryos of 24 hpf. The PCR was carried out using Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) with smyhc1-ATG and smyhc1-stop primers. The PCR product was phosphorylated by T4 Kinase (Promega) and cloned into the Stu I site of pCS2 vector to generate the cmv:smyhc1 plasmid. The CMV promoter in the cmv:smyhc1 plasmid was removed by Sal I and BamH I digestion and replaced by the ef1α promoter from pT2AL200R150G plasmid . The final construct was named ef1α:smyhc1.
smyhc1-ATG primer: 5′ –accatgggtgacgccgttatggca- 3′
smyhc1-stop primer: 5′ –gattacccttcatcatgtcctttcttg- 3′
The rescue experiment was performed by co-injecting smyhc1 ATG-MO (5ng) with 50 pg of ef1α:smyhc1 plasmid DNA. Injection of ef1α:smyhc1 plasmid alone was used as control to show the expression of the construct by whole mount antibody staining with F59 antibody at 12 and 22 hpf.
BTS (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide) Treatment
BTS (S949760, Sigma) stock solution (50 mM) was prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). For dose-dependent analysis, zebrafish embryos were incubated with BTS in fish water containing different concentrations of BTS (0.16 µM, 0.8 µM, 4 µM, 20 µM, 100 µM). The treatment started at the 6 somite stage (12 hpf) and stopped 30 hours after the treatment.
For analysis of BTS-induced myofibril defects, zebrafish embryos (100 each dish) were incubated with 50 µM of BTS. The treatment started at the 6 somite stage (12 hpf) and terminated at 36, 60 and 72 hpf by fixing in 4% paraformaldehyde for use with antibody staining.
Immunostaining was carried out using whole-mount zebrafish embryos (1–3 days post-fertilization) as previously described , . Briefly, zebrafish embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (in PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature. The fixed embryos were washed for 15 minutes 3 times in PBST. Three day old embryos were digested in 1 mg/ml collagenase for 75 minutes. Immunostaining was performed with the following primary antibodies: anti-α-actinin (clone EA-53, #A7811, Sigma), anti-MyHC for slow muscles (F59, DSHB), anti-myosin light chain for fast muscles (F310, DSHB), anti-MyHC (MF-20, DSHB), anti-myomesin (mMaC myomesin B4, DSHB), and anti-α−actin (Ac1-20.4.2, Progen). Secondary antibodies were FITC conjugates (Sigma).
All these studies have been conducted in triplicate. Approximately 100 embryos were analyzed for each injection and treatment per experiment. Moe than seven hundred of embryos have been analyzed during the course of this study. Among those analyzed embryos, over 95% of the smyhc1 knockdown embryos and 100% of the BTS (20 µM) treated embryos showed the muscle defects, indicating that the effects from the knockdown and BTS treatment were statistically significant.
We thank John Stubblefield, Elena Bernick and Huiqing Li for editing and constructive discussion.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MC SJD. Performed the experiments: MC JL SJD. Analyzed the data: MC SJD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JPYK. Wrote the paper: SJD. Reviewed the manuscript.
- 1. Agarkova I,Perriard JC (2005) The M-band: an elastic web that crosslinks thick filaments in the center of the sarcomere. Trends Cell Biol 15: 477–485.
- 2. Boateng SY,Goldspink PH (2008) Assembly and maintenance of the sarcomere night and day. Cardiovasc Res 77: 667–675.
- 3. Clark KA,McElhinny AS,Beckerle MC,Gregorio CC (2002) Striated muscle cytoarchitecture: an intricate web of form and function. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 18: 637–706.
- 4. Frank D,Kuhn C,Katus HA,Frey N (2006) The sarcomeric Z-disc: a nodal point in signalling and disease. J Mol Med 84: 446–468.
- 5. Gregorio CC,Granzier H,Sorimachi H,Labeit S (1999) Muscle assembly: a titanic achievement? Curr Opin Cell Biol 11: 18–25.
- 6. Squire JM (1997) Architecture and function in the muscle sarcomere. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7: 247–257.
- 7. Sanger JW,Chowrashi P,Shaner NC,Spalthoff S,Wang J,et al. (2002) Myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res S153–162.
- 8. Epstein HF,Fischman DA (1991) Molecular analysis of protein assembly in muscle development. Science 251: 1039–1044.
- 9. Sparrow JC,Schock F (2009) The initial steps of myofibril assembly: integrins pave the way. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 293–298.
- 10. Barral JM,Bauer CC,Ortiz I,Epstein HF (1998) Unc-45 mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans implicate a CRO1/She4p-like domain in myosin assembly. J Cell Biol 143: 1215–1225.
- 11. Epstein HF,Bernstein SI (1992) Genetic approaches to understanding muscle development. Dev Biol 154: 231–244.
- 12. Epstein HF,Thomson JN (1974) Temperature-sensitive mutation affecting myofilament assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 250: 579–580.
- 13. Landsverk ML,Epstein HF (2005) Genetic analysis of myosin II assembly and organization in model organisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 2270–2282.
- 14. Moerman DG,Williams BD (2006) Sarcomere assembly in C. elegans muscle. WormBook 1–16.
- 15. Du SJ,Li H,Bian Y,Zhong Y (2008) Heat-shock protein 90alpha1 is required for organized myofibril assembly in skeletal muscles of zebrafish embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 554–559.
- 16. Etard C,Behra M,Fischer N,Hutcheson D,Geisler R,et al. (2007) The UCS factor Steif/Unc-45b interacts with the heat shock protein Hsp90a during myofibrillogenesis. Dev Biol 308: 133–143.
- 17. Hawkins TA,Haramis AP,Etard C,Prodromou C,Vaughan CK,et al. (2008) The ATPase-dependent chaperoning activity of Hsp90a regulates thick filament formation and integration during skeletal muscle myofibrillogenesis. Development 135: 1147–1156.
- 18. Srikakulam R,Winkelmann DA (2004) Chaperone-mediated folding and assembly of myosin in striated muscle. J Cell Sci 117: 641–652.
- 19. Sass JB,Martin CC,Krone PH (1999) Restricted expression of the zebrafish hsp90alpha gene in slow and fast muscle fiber lineages. Int J Dev Biol 43: 835–838.
- 20. Bryson-Richardson RJ,Daggett DF,Cortes F,Neyt C,Keenan DG,et al. (2005) Myosin heavy chain expression in zebrafish and slow muscle composition. Dev Dyn 233: 1018–1022.
- 21. Elworthy S,Hargrave M,Knight R,Mebus K,Ingham PW (2008) Expression of multiple slow myosin heavy chain genes reveals a diversity of zebrafish slow twitch muscle fibres with differing requirements for Hedgehog and Prdm1 activity. Development 135: 2115–2126.
- 22. Devoto SH,Melancon E,Eisen JS,Westerfield M (1996) Identification of separate slow and fast muscle precursor cells in vivo, prior to somite formation. Development 122: 3371–3380.
- 23. McGuigan K,Phillips PC,Postlethwait JH (2004) Evolution of sarcomeric myosin heavy chain genes: evidence from fish. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1042–1056.
- 24. Cheung A,Dantzig JA,Hollingworth S,Baylor SM,Goldman YE,et al. (2002) A small-molecule inhibitor of skeletal muscle myosin II. Nat Cell Biol 4: 83–88.
- 25. Kagawa M,Sato N,Obinata T (2006) Effects of BTS (N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide), an inhibitor for myosin-actin interaction, on myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells in culture. Zoolog Sci 23: 969–975.
- 26. Dou Y,Andersson-Lendahl M,Arner A (2008) Structure and function of skeletal muscle in zebrafish early larvae. J Gen Physiol 131: 445–453.
- 27. Hayashi T,Silver RB,Ip W,Cayer ML,Smith DS (1977) Actin-myosin interaction. Self-assembly into a bipolar “contractile unit”. J Mol Biol 111: 159–171.
- 28. Chun M,Falkenthal S (1988) Ifm(2)2 is a myosin heavy chain allele that disrupts myofibrillar assembly only in the indirect flight muscle of Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Biol 107: 2613–2621.
- 29. Dibb NJ,Brown DM,Karn J,Moerman DG,Bolten SL,et al. (1985) Sequence analysis of mutations that affect the synthesis, assembly and enzymatic activity of the unc-54 myosin heavy chain of Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 183: 543–551.
- 30. Li H,Randall WR,Du SJ (2009) skNAC (skeletal Naca), a muscle-specific isoform of Naca (nascent polypeptide-associated complex alpha), is required for myofibril organization. Faseb J 23: 1988–2000.
- 31. Funatsu T,Higuchi H,Ishiwata S (1990) Elastic filaments in skeletal muscle revealed by selective removal of thin filaments with plasma gelsolin. J Cell Biol 110: 53–62.
- 32. Funatsu T,Kono E,Higuchi H,Kimura S,Ishiwata S,et al. (1993) Elastic filaments in situ in cardiac muscle: deep-etch replica analysis in combination with selective removal of actin and myosin filaments. J Cell Biol 120: 711–724.
- 33. Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos A,Catino DH,Strong JC,Sutter S,Borisov AB,et al. (2006) Obscurin modulates the assembly and organization of sarcomeres and the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Faseb J 20: 2102–2111.
- 34. van der Ven PF,Bartsch JW,Gautel M,Jockusch H,Furst DO (2000) A functional knock-out of titin results in defective myofibril assembly. J Cell Sci 113(Pt 8): 1405–1414.
- 35. Witt CC,Burkart C,Labeit D,McNabb M,Wu Y,et al. (2006) Nebulin regulates thin filament length, contractility, and Z-disk structure in vivo. Embo J 25: 3843–3855.
- 36. Soeno Y,Shimada Y,Obinata T (1999) BDM (2,3-butanedione monoxime), an inhibitor of myosin-actin interaction, suppresses myofibrillogenesis in skeletal muscle cells in culture. Cell Tissue Res 295: 307–316.
- 37. Ramachandran I,Terry M,Ferrari MB (2003) Skeletal muscle myosin cross-bridge cycling is necessary for myofibrillogenesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 55: 61–72.
- 38. Shaw MA,Ostap EM,Goldman YE (2003) Mechanism of inhibition of skeletal muscle actomyosin by N-benzyl-p-toluenesulfonamide. Biochemistry 42: 6128–6135.
- 39. Bejsovec A,Anderson P (1988) Myosin heavy-chain mutations that disrupt Caenorhabditis elegans thick filament assembly. Genes Dev 2: 1307–1317.
- 40. Lowey S,Slayter HS,Weeds AG,Baker H (1969) Substructure of the myosin molecule. I. Subfragments of myosin by enzymic degradation. J Mol Biol 42: 1–29.
- 41. Cripps RM,Suggs JA,Bernstein SI (1999) Assembly of thick filaments and myofibrils occurs in the absence of the myosin head. Embo J 18: 1793–1804.
- 42. Zhao R,Davey M,Hsu YC,Kaplanek P,Tong A,et al. (2005) Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell 120: 715–27.
- 43. Granato M,van Eeden FJ,Schach U,Trowe T,Brand M,et al. (1996) Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behavior of the zebrafish embryo and larva. Development 123: 399–413.
- 44. Ali MM,Roe SM,Vaughan CK,Meyer P,Panaretou B,et al. (2006) Crystal structure of an Hsp90-nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed chaperone complex. Nature 440: 1013–1017.
- 45. Urasaki A,Morvan G,Kawakami K (2006) Functional dissection of the Tol2 transposable element identified the minimal cis-sequence and a highly repetitive sequence in the subterminal region essential for transposition. Genetics 174: 639–49.
- 46. Tan X,Rotllant J,Li H,De Deyne P,Du SJ (2006) SmyD1, a histone methyltransferase, is required for myofibril organization and muscle contraction in zebrafish embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2713–2718.