Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Impact of Empire Expansion on Household Diet: The Inka in Northern Chile's Atacama Desert

  • Sheila Dorsey Vinton,

    Affiliation Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, United States of America

  • Linda Perry,

    Affiliation Archaeobiology Program, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., United States of America

  • Karl J. Reinhard ,

    kreinhard1@mac.com

    Affiliation School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America

  • Calogero M. Santoro,

    Affiliations Instituto Alta Investigación, Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile, Centro de Investigaciones del Hombre en el Desierto, Arica, Chile

  • Isabel Teixeira-Santos

    Affiliation Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Impact of Empire Expansion on Household Diet: The Inka in Northern Chile's Atacama Desert

  • Sheila Dorsey Vinton, 
  • Linda Perry, 
  • Karl J. Reinhard, 
  • Calogero M. Santoro, 
  • Isabel Teixeira-Santos
PLOS
x

Abstract

The impact of expanding civilization on the health of American indigenous societies has long been studied. Most studies have focused on infections and malnutrition that occurred when less complex societies were incorporated into more complex civilizations. The details of dietary change, however, have rarely been explored. Using the analysis of starch residues recovered from coprolites, here we evaluate the dietary adaptations of indigenous farmers in northern Chile's Atacama Desert during the time that the Inka Empire incorporated these communities into their economic system. This system has been described as “complementarity” because it involves interaction and trade in goods produced at different Andean elevations. We find that as local farming societies adapted to this new asymmetric system, a portion of their labor had to be given up to the Inka elite through a corvée tax system for maize production. In return, the Inka system of complementarity introduced previously rare foods from the Andean highlands into local economies. These changes caused a disruption of traditional communities as they instituted a state-level economic system on local farmers. Combined with previously published infection information for the same populations under Inka rule, the data suggest that there may have been a dual health impact from disruption of nutrition and introduction of crowd disease.

Introduction

The influence of state-level civilizations on indigenous societies has long been studied, especially from the perspective of the emergence of infections disease and malnutrition. Sensational discoveries of ancient DNA in human coprolites (desiccated feces) have highlighted the importance of coprolites in the study of these social interactions in the Americas [1], [2]. The analysis of series of coprolites can be used to evaluate hypotheses regarding changes of diet and parasitism between time periods and cultures using long-standing theories and methods [3], [4]. We undertook a study of coprolites from pre-Inka and Inka period sites to evaluate the impact of the state on local health and diet. The sites are located in the Lluta Valley near Arica, Chile in the northern Atacama Desert. Previously, we found that crowd parasites (Enterobius vermicularis or pinworm) emerged when the indigenous farmers fell under Inka control [5]. Fish tapeworm, Diphyllobothrium pacificum, was present in Inka times but was not observed in pre-Inka contexts. Our next question related to the impact of the Inka on local diet. To answer this we developed a new method for analyzing starch from coprolites.

Dietary change relates to how local communities become integrated into the political, economic, and ideological systems imposed by the state. This process of integration is the focus of many studies of ancient empires. Such studies are concerned with details such as how indigenous communities negotiated new political circumstances, to what extent they lost their traditional pattern of life, and how much of their own economic sustainability was jeopardized or changed as a consequence of state demands [6]. Here we show how the influence of the Inka Empire changed local diet through analysis of a series of human coprolites from two pre-Hispanic periods in the Lluta River Valley. We focus on starch analysis to evaluate the diversity and preparation of Andean grains and tubers. The utility of starch analysis in paleoethnobotanical studies has been demonstrated from more than a decade [7]. This approach has rarely been applied or published from coprolite analysis.

In the South Central Andes, with a pivotal center in the Lake Titicaca basin, the Inka took advantage of previous Andean economic strategies for accessing and circulating products among a diverse range of ethnic groups situated in a highly variable Andean ecology. Murra described the redistribution principle as “ecological complementarity” that he originally defined as vertical archipelago or “verticality.” In this system, distinct altitudinal Andean ecological tiers were linked through direct control by each political ethnic group [8], [9]. According to his model, highland people maintained colonies in the lowlands on both the Pacific and Amazonian sides of the Andes. This organizational strategy affected distribution of food, prestige, and ceremonial goods. Early colonial written records state that prior to the Spanish conquest, highland Aymara-speaking groups (Lupaqa, Pacaje, and later in colonial times the Caranga) maintained colonies on productive enclaves on the coastal valleys of Arica, Chile [9], [10], [11]. This region includes our study area, the Lluta River Valley near Arica, Chile [12]. Using coprolite analysis, we are testing the hypothesis that the Inka system introduced highland Andean crops into the Lluta Valley while reducing local consumption of taxable maize (Zea mays).

We analyzed a series of 48 coprolites from Lluta Valley archaeological sites to test the hypothesis that the Inka Empire introduced a different framework for crop production, circulation, and consumption that reached domestic levels of local communities. This pattern has been described previously in the central Andes of Peru [13]. The coprolite samples were obtained from dry sieving archaeological deposits excavated from cane and reed wall domestic structures of six hamlets in the coastal section of the Lluta Valley, 20 to 25 km from the coast [14]. These sites show evidence of occupation during the Inka Late Period (AD 1400–1532), and the pre-Inka Late Intermediate Period (AD 1100 –1400). The coprolites were recovered from 21 contexts at six different sites. The sites show no evidence of Spanish colonial activities.

Coprolites are common in Atacama Desert archaeological sites [15], [16], [17]. Although coprolites have been used to describe dietary development over long periods of time, only rarely are coprolites used to test specific hypotheses regarding culture change. Starchy foods were a prominent portion of the Andean diet and, therefore, the remains of these plants are abundant in coprolites. Due to several biases in the history of the development of the discipline, starch analysis as a source of dietary data has lagged in coprolite studies [18], [19], [20].

Results and Discussion

It is noteworthy that for the Lluta Valley coprolites, all but two contained starch. The near ubiquity of starch granules in the coprolites demonstrates that starch is the most productive area for diet reconstruction and comparison in the Atacama region as recently recommended by reviewers of Moche coprolite analysis [19].

The 25 pre-Inka coprolites showed a high consumption of maize starch and limited consumption of tubers [20]. Only two samples contained anything other than maize starch. One contained maize and yuca (Manihot esculenta) and another contained maize and oca (Oxalis tuberosa). In the 23 Inka period coprolites, a greater presence of tubers was represented. Six contained yuca starch. Four contained oca starch. Four contained potato (Solanum spp.) starch. Six contain unknown starch and 21 contained maize starch. Therefore, in addition to maize, three or more types of tubers or starchy plants were eaten.

Insignificant chi square values for individual starch comparisons were obtained for maize (0.185), yuca (1.169), oca (0.216), and potato (1.361). However, when all tubers were combined a significant chi square value of 7.312 was obtained.

A subset of the coprolite series was analyzed for concentration values following a method of pollen analysis recently adapted to coprolite analysis [21]. The maize counts are presented in Table 1 with calculated concentrations of starch granules in terms of granules per gram of coprolite. In general, there are more maize starch granules in pre-Inka coprolites. Most importantly, the numbers of damaged starch granules are higher in pre-Inka times. The average ratio of damaged starch to pristine starch granules for the Pre-Inka is 9.6. The ratio for the Inka is 1.8.

A common maize-based food in the Andes was chicha. Chicha is a drink made of fermented maize. Our data from experiments in brewing maize meal into chicha demonstrate that the damaged grains are evidence of the consumption of this fermented beverage. When examined microscopically, the damaged starch granules displayed surface furrowing that is identical to many of the maize granules recovered from the coprolite samples (Fig. 1). Additionally, the archaeological samples are characterized by damage that has been produced by the grinding of uncooked, dried maize in laboratory settings (Fig. 1). Absent in the coprolite samples examined by coauthor LP were gelatinized starches, those that have been damaged by heat typical of cooking processes.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Comparison of ancient starch with modern starch from experimental preparation.

All images are of equivalent scale. A. Maize starch granules from the experimental fermentation experiment showing furrowing damage. B. Maize starches derived from archaeological sample #51 showing furrowing damage from fermentation and scooping from grinding. C. Unaltered maize meal prior to the experiment. D. Scooping of maize starch produced in a grinding experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008069.g001

When the coprolite samples are viewed in light of the experimental results, the following scenario can be reconstructed. The archaeological starches have been subject to grinding and fermentation, but not to cooking. Modern chicha can be prepared either raw or cooked, with the heated chicha having a much longer stable shelf life than the uncooked. Thus, this chicha was made from ground, dried maize, and was expected to be drunk within a short period of time. The coprolite data show that pre-Inka Empire farmers consumed more of this maize chicha than farmers who fell under Inka rule.

The ethnobotanical data demonstrate that under Inka management there was an increase of consumption of starchy root crops (oca, yuca and chuñ'u [dehydrated potato]) [20]. Oca and chuñ'u could not have been cultivated locally, and, thus would have been brought into the sites from the highlands [14], [20]. Simultaneously, there was a reduction in the consumption of maize in the form of chicha. This decreased production was not recognizable in assemblages of artifacts [14]. In contrast, at the Sausa site in Central highland Peru, there is a generalized increase in maize production and consumption along with a reduction in the consumption of tubers under the Inka regime [13], [22].

Based on the maize concentration data of processed versus unprocessed starch granules, we can interpret that maize has a double function of food and ceremony. Chicha was produced in the Lluta valley under the corvée labor Inka state tax system known as mit'a [23], [24], [25], [26]. Contrary to the pre-Inka period, a small part of maize was consumed by as chicha by local commoners, while the main bulk was incorporated into the state circulation system, to be consumed elsewhere. Therefore, the relative lack of altered maize starch in Inka period coprolites indicates that only a portion of processed maize in the form of fermented maize chicha was distributed back to the village populations while the rest was taken by the state in the mit'a and the redistrubution Inka system. This pattern has been previously hypothesized by Morris and Thompson and Murra [27], [28]. Another important change in the domestic economy was the introduction of tuber crops (potatoes and oca) from the highlands. These crops circulated alongside other exotic goods found both at domestic and funerary contexts in the Lluta valley [12], [14].

For more than a decade, the value of starch residue analysis has been demonstrated in archaeological contexts [29], [30]. The results from this study establish that starch from coprolites can both reveal details of plant production in state economic systems and support previous hypotheses [25], [26]. The pre-Inka Lluta Valley traditional life focused on local production and consumption of chicha. This tradition was largely lost under the Inka. The data show that the farmers of the Lluta Valley negotiated the Inka political circumstances by consuming less, and perhaps producing more, of their traditional maize chicha. This reduction was a consequence of state demands for corn to transform it into chicha in the Inka tax labor and distributional system. The fact that they became absorbed in the Inka vertical redistribution system is represented by the larger presence of exotic tubers in Inka times. This change may represent the fact that the farmers' sustainability was altered by the Inka expansion.

In summary, the inclusion of the farming society of the Lluta Valley in the Inka Empire resulted in dietary changes. Previously, we found a difference in infectious disease[5]. There is a connection between the two relating to the expansion of the Inka State in the Lluta Valley. Crowd pathology, such as pinworm infection, increased in the Lluta valley when the Inka established large village communities that replaced earlier dispersed small farms. At the same time, the subsistence was altered. Maize chicha consumption declined as highland Andean tubers were introduced into the communities. Further study of Lluta Valley mummies and skeletons must be done to assess the levels of pathology that are associated with parasitological and dietary developments of the Inka Empire.

Materials and Methods

The methods used for processing the coprolites involved rehydration, disaggregation, screening, and microscopic analysis [5], [19], [20]. One Lycopodium spore tablet, containing 11,300 plus or minus 400 spores, was added to each gram of sample. The addition of a known number of identifiable spores enables an estimation of pollen grains, starch grains, and parasites per gram of coprolite [21]. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% NaPO3 in 250 ml beakers. The samples were allowed to rehydrate for 48 hours. They were stirred with a magnetic stir bar to disaggregate the components. The disaggregated residues were washed through a 0.25-mm mesh screen to separate large components from microscopic components including starch. The sediment left on the screens was dried and analyzed. The microscopic residues were then concentrated by centrifugation. The microscopic residues were placed into 4 dr vials with 95% ethanol. Three microscope slides were made from each sample of microresidues from the 48 coprolites. The starch grains were analyzed with a Jenaval research microscope using polarized light.

Starch can easily be identified microscopically with a polarizing light. The granules fluoresce in a pinwheel configuration called interference crosses. Polarization can be very brilliant to very weak [31]. Starch can be identified to family and genus level by size, shape, and sometimes fissures present in the granule. To evaluate the amount of starch to fiber for several Andean foods, samples from various plants that grow in the Andes highlands or that comprised a large portion of the diet were collected and prepared into a starch reference collection. The collection included maize (Zea mays), yuca (Manihot esculenta), oca (Oxalis crenata), chuñ'u (Solanum spp.), maca (Lepidium meyenii), arracacha (Arracacia xanthorrhiza) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa).

Later, a subset of 11 Inka coprolites and 10 pre-Inka coprolites were analyzed for maize starch concentrations. Specifically, the numbers of pristine maize starch granules and altered starch granules were counted and the concentrations of these were calculated by use of microfossil concentration technique [21]. Experiments were completed with modern maize to replicate the alteration observed in the prehistoric starch. During the examination of archaeobotanical samples that include starch granules, it is not unusual to observe morphological features of these residues that appear to have been altered from their native states. In attempts to understand these morphological changes, several experimental studies have been undertaken. These studies have replicated many processes believed to be typical in the ancient preparation of plant foods and include the grinding of seeds with stone tools, freeze drying of potatoes, cooking of various foods with water, and fermentation of grain with yeast [32], [33], [34]. The experimental procedures resulted in starch granules with clearly defined patterns of damage that are diagnostic of the types of processing. Thus, with careful analysis, archaeological starch granules that bear damage identical to that achieved through modern experimental processing can be reliable indicators of the use of these processes in the past [32].

For the purposes of replicating damage caused by fermentation during the production of chicha, a commercially prepared corn meal was placed in a container with filtered water and human saliva. This mixture was placed in a closed but unsealed plastic container, and was allowed to ferment outdoors for four days during which time ambient temperatures ranged between 21 and 33 degrees Centigrade. At the end of this time, the mixture smelled strongly like sourdough bread starter, an indication that the fermentation had been successful. To determine the type of damage caused by the process, starch grains from the fermented mixture were examined microscopically (Fig. 1).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SDV LP KR CMS. Performed the experiments: SDV LP KR ITS. Analyzed the data: SDV KR ITS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KR CMS. Wrote the paper: SDV LP KR CMS.

References

  1. 1. Poinar HN, Kuch M, Sobolik KD, Barnes I, Stankiewicz AB, et al. (2001) A molecular analysis of dietary diversity for three Archaic Native Americans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4317–4322.HN PoinarM. KuchKD SobolikI. BarnesAB Stankiewicz2001A molecular analysis of dietary diversity for three Archaic Native Americans.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA9843174322
  2. 2. Thomas M, Gilbert P, Jenkins DL, Götherstrom A, Naveran N, et al. (2008) DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320: 786–789.M. ThomasP. GilbertDL JenkinsA. GötherstromN. Naveran2008DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America.Science320786789
  3. 3. Reinhard KJ (1988) Cultural ecology of prehistoric parasitism on the Colorado Plateau as evidenced by coprology. Am J Phys Anthropol 77: 355–366.KJ Reinhard1988Cultural ecology of prehistoric parasitism on the Colorado Plateau as evidenced by coprology.Am J Phys Anthropol77355366
  4. 4. Reinhard KJ, Byrant VM (2008) Pathoecology and the future of coprolite studies. In: Stodder AWM, editor. Reanalysis and reinterpretation in southwestern bioarchaeology. Tempe: Arizona State University Press. pp. 199–216.KJ ReinhardVM Byrant2008Pathoecology and the future of coprolite studies.AWM StodderReanalysis and reinterpretation in southwestern bioarchaeologyTempeArizona State University Press199216
  5. 5. Santoro C, Vinton SD, Reinhard K (2003) Inca expansion and parasitism in the Lluta Valley: preliminary data. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 98: 161–163.C. SantoroSD VintonK. Reinhard2003Inca expansion and parasitism in the Lluta Valley: preliminary data.Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz98161163
  6. 6. Dillehay TD, Williams VI, Santoro CM (2006) Áreas periféricas y nucleares. Contextos de interacciones sociales complejas y multidireccionales. Chungara Rev Antropol Chil 38: 249–256.TD DillehayVI WilliamsCM Santoro2006Áreas periféricas y nucleares. Contextos de interacciones sociales complejas y multidireccionales.Chungara Rev Antropol Chil38249256
  7. 7. Bryant VM (2003) Invisible clues to New World plant domestication. Science 299: 1029–1030.VM Bryant2003Invisible clues to New World plant domestication.Science29910291030
  8. 8. Murra JV (1985) The limits and limitations of the “Vertical Archipielago” in the Andes. In: Masuda S, Shimada I, Morris C, editors. Andean ecology and civilization, an interdisciplinary perspective on Andean ecological complementarity. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. pp. 15–20.JV Murra1985The limits and limitations of the “Vertical Archipielago” in the Andes.S. MasudaI. ShimadaC. MorrisAndean ecology and civilization, an interdisciplinary perspective on Andean ecological complementarityTokyoUniversity of Tokyo Press1520
  9. 9. Murra JV (1972) El control de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economía de las sociedades andinas. In: Murra JV, editor. Iñigo Ortiz de Zúñiga, Visita de la Provincia de León de Huanuco [1562] volumen 2. Huanuco: Universidad Hermilio Valdizan. pp. 428–468.JV Murra1972El control de un máximo de pisos ecológicos en la economía de las sociedades andinas.JV MurraIñigo Ortiz de Zúñiga, Visita de la Provincia de León de Huanuco [1562] volumen 2HuanucoUniversidad Hermilio Valdizan428468
  10. 10. Hidalgo J, Durston A (1998) Reconstitución étnica colonial en la Sierra de Arica: El Cacicazgo de Codpa, 1650–1780. Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Etnohistoria Tomo II: 32–75.J. HidalgoA. Durston1998Reconstitución étnica colonial en la Sierra de Arica: El Cacicazgo de Codpa, 1650–1780.Actas del IV Congreso Internacional de Etnohistoria TomoII3275
  11. 11. van Buren M (1996) Rethinking the vertical archipelago. Amer Anthropol 98: 338–351.M. van Buren1996Rethinking the vertical archipelago.Amer Anthropol98338351
  12. 12. Santoro CM, Hidalgo J, Valenzuela D, Romero Á, Rothhammer F, et al. (2009) ¿Espacios multiétnicos y verticalidad costera? revisita al “Tercer Caso” de Murra y a la arqueología del valle de Lluta, área Centro Sur Andina. Chungara Rev Antropol Chil 41, in press. CM SantoroJ. HidalgoD. ValenzuelaÁ. RomeroF. Rothhammer2009¿Espacios multiétnicos y verticalidad costera? revisita al “Tercer Caso” de Murra y a la arqueología del valle de Lluta, área Centro Sur Andina.Chungara Rev Antropol Chil 41, in press
  13. 13. Hastorf CA (1990) The effect of the Inka State on Sausa agricultural production and crop consumption. Amer Antiq 55: 262–290.CA Hastorf1990The effect of the Inka State on Sausa agricultural production and crop consumption.Amer Antiq55262290
  14. 14. Santoro CM (1995) Late prehistoric regional interaction and social change in a coastal valley of northern Chile. Ph.D. thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. 220 p.CM Santoro1995Late prehistoric regional interaction and social change in a coastal valley of northern Chile. Ph.D. thesis.PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh220
  15. 15. Holden TG (1991) Evidence of prehistoric diet from northern Chile: coprolites, gut contents and flotation samples from the Tulan Quebrada. World Archaeol 22: 320–331.TG Holden1991Evidence of prehistoric diet from northern Chile: coprolites, gut contents and flotation samples from the Tulan Quebrada.World Archaeol22320331
  16. 16. Williams IR (1980) Analysis of coprolites recovered from six sites in northern Chile. In: Meighan CW, True DL, editors. Prehistoric trails of Atacama: archaeology of northern Chile. Los Angeles: University of California. pp. 195–204.IR Williams1980Analysis of coprolites recovered from six sites in northern Chile.CW MeighanDL TruePrehistoric trails of Atacama: archaeology of northern ChileLos AngelesUniversity of California195204
  17. 17. Núñez L, Hall H (1982) Análisis de dieta y movilidad en un campamiento arcaico del norte de Chile (Analysis of diet and mobility in an Archaic camp of northern Chile). Bol Inst Franc Estud Andin 11: 91–114.L. NúñezH. Hall1982Análisis de dieta y movilidad en un campamiento arcaico del norte de Chile (Analysis of diet and mobility in an Archaic camp of northern Chile).Bol Inst Franc Estud Andin1191114
  18. 18. Reinhard KJ, Byrant VM (1992) Coprolite analysis: a biological perspective on archaeology. In: Schiffer MB, editor. Advances in archaeological method and theory 4. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp. 245–288.KJ ReinhardVM Byrant1992Coprolite analysis: a biological perspective on archaeology.MB SchifferAdvances in archaeological method and theory 4TucsonUniversity of Arizona Press245288
  19. 19. Reinhard KJ, Byrant VM, Vinton SD (2007) Reinterpreting the pollen data from Dos Cabezas. Internat J Osteoarchaeol 17: 531–541.KJ ReinhardVM ByrantSD Vinton2007Reinterpreting the pollen data from Dos Cabezas.Internat J Osteoarchaeol17531541
  20. 20. Vinton SDSD Vinton(1997) Dietary analysis of coprolites from the Lluta Valley in Arica, Chile. M.A. thesis. Lincoln, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln. 212 p. (1997) Dietary analysis of coprolites from the Lluta Valley in Arica, Chile. M.A. thesis. Lincoln, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln. 212 p.
  21. 21. Reinhard KJ, Edwards SK, Damon TR, Meier DK (2006) Pollen concentration analysis of Ancestral Pueblo dietary variation. Palaeogeog Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 237: 92–109.KJ ReinhardSK EdwardsTR DamonDK Meier2006Pollen concentration analysis of Ancestral Pueblo dietary variation.Palaeogeog Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol23792109
  22. 22. Hastorf CA, Johannessen S (1993) Pre-Hispanic political change and the role of maize in the Central Andes of Peru. Amer Anthropol 95: 115–138.CA HastorfS. Johannessen1993Pre-Hispanic political change and the role of maize in the Central Andes of Peru.Amer Anthropol95115138
  23. 23. D'Altroy T (1992) Provincial power in the Inka Empire. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. 284 p.T. D'Altroy1992Provincial power in the Inka Empire.Washington, D.C.Smithsonian Institution Press284
  24. 24. D'Altroy T, Hastorf C (1984) The distribution and contents of Inca state storehouses in the Xauxa region of Peru. Am Antiq 49: 334–49.T. D'AltroyC. Hastorf1984The distribution and contents of Inca state storehouses in the Xauxa region of Peru.Am Antiq4933449
  25. 25. Murra JV (1980) The Economic organization of the Inca State. Greenwich: JAI Press. 214 p.JV Murra1980The Economic organization of the Inca State.GreenwichJAI Press214
  26. 26. Murra JV (1983) La mit'a al Tawantinsuyu: prestaciones de los grupos étnicos. Chungara Rev Antropol Chil 10: 77–94.JV Murra1983La mit'a al Tawantinsuyu: prestaciones de los grupos étnicos.Chungara Rev Antropol Chil107794
  27. 27. Morris C, Thompson DE (1985) Huánuco Pampa - an Inca city and its hinterland. London: Thames and Hudson. 181 p.C. MorrisDE Thompson1985Huánuco Pampa - an Inca city and its hinterland.LondonThames and Hudson181
  28. 28. Murra JV (1975) Formaciones económicas y políticas del mundo Andino. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos. 230 p.JV Murra1975Formaciones económicas y políticas del mundo Andino.LimaInstituto de Estudios Peruanos230
  29. 29. Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Holst I, Hansell P (2000) Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest. Nature 407: 894–897.DR PipernoAJ RanereI. HolstP. Hansell2000Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest.Nature407894897
  30. 30. Pohl MED, Pipperno DR, Pope KO, Jones JG (2007) Microfossil evidence for pre-Columbian maize dispersals in the neotropics from San Andre's, Tabasco, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 6870–6875.MED PohlDR PippernoKO PopeJG Jones2007Microfossil evidence for pre-Columbian maize dispersals in the neotropics from San Andre's, Tabasco, Mexico.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA10468706875
  31. 31. Wivinis GP, Maywald EC (1967) Photographs of starches. In: Wivinis GP, Maywald EC, editors. Starch, Chemistry and Technology. New York: Academic Press. pp. 649–685.GP WivinisEC Maywald1967Photographs of starches.GP WivinisEC MaywaldStarch, Chemistry and TechnologyNew YorkAcademic Press649685
  32. 32. Babot , M. del P (2003) Starch grain damage as an indicator of food processing. In: Hart DM, Wallis LA, editors. Phytolith and starch research in the Australian-Pacific-Asian regions: the state of the art. Canberra: Pandanus Books. pp. 69–81.BabotP. M. del2003Starch grain damage as an indicator of food processing.DM HartLA WallisPhytolith and starch research in the Australian-Pacific-Asian regions: the state of the artCanberraPandanus Books6981
  33. 33. Henry AG, Hudson HF, Piperno DR (2009) Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking. J Archaeol Sci 36: 915–922.AG HenryHF HudsonDR Piperno2009Changes in starch grain morphologies from cooking.J Archaeol Sci36915922
  34. 34. Perry L, Sandweiss D, Piperno D, Rademaker K, Malpass M, et al. (2006) Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Natur 440: 76–79.L. PerryD. SandweissD. PipernoK. RademakerM. Malpass2006Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru.Natur4407679