Genetic and biological evidence supports a role for DISC1 across a spectrum of major mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. There is evidence for genetic interplay between variants in DISC1 and in biologically interacting loci in psychiatric illness. DISC1 also associates with normal variance in behavioral and brain imaging phenotypes.
Here, we analyze public domain datasets and demonstrate correlations between variants in the DISC1 pathway genes and levels of gene expression. Genetic variants of DISC1, NDE1, PDE4B and PDE4D regulate the expression of cytoskeletal, synaptogenic, neurodevelopmental and sensory perception proteins. Interestingly, these regulated genes include existing targets for drug development in depression and psychosis.
Citation: Hennah W, Porteous D (2009) The DISC1 Pathway Modulates Expression of Neurodevelopmental, Synaptogenic and Sensory Perception Genes. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004906
Editor: Andreas Reif, University of Wuerzburg, Germany
Received: January 14, 2009; Accepted: January 29, 2009; Published: March 20, 2009
Copyright: © 2009 Hennah, Porteous. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Dr. Hennah is a long term EMBO research fellow. This work was funded in part by the UK Medical Research Council. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
A key challenge for human genomics is to provide insight into normal physiological processes and pathogenic mechanisms. There is strong evidence for a major genetic component to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but, with some notable exceptions, few of the many proposed candidate genes have been consistently replicated , . It has been argued that much of the genetic variance associated with common complex disease and quantitative trait variance is likely to be regulatory rather than coding . The combination of high density SNP analysis with expression profiling provides a means to assess the genome wide control of gene expression . This approach has been applied successfully to the analysis of EBV transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and of human tissue . Here, we apply the approach specifically to the DISC1 pathway for additional insight into genetic mediators of psychosis and related biology.
Studies of DISC1 and its interactors have established this as one of the most promising pathways underlying psychosis. This evidence includes a) linkage and association signals across the DISC locus for multiple psychiatric, cognitive and brain imaging  traits, b) binding of DISC1 to multiple protein partners with known roles in neurobiology  and c) mouse models of Disc1 by ENU missense mutagenesis  or transgenic over-expression –, which display overlapping neurodevelopmental and behavioral phenotypes, with abnormal working memory as a core shared deficit. Of direct relevance to this study is the recent evidence for genetic interplay between DISC1 variants  and observations of association to psychiatric illness for the DISC1 interactors NDE1, NDEL1, PDE4B, and PDE4D , (Text S1). Functional studies of these proteins have shown that they are involved in cytoskeletal, and nervous system development related functions, including synaptic plasticity and neuronal migration . Although psychosis is a brain disorder, DISC1, NDE1, NDEL1, PDE4B and PDE4D and many other members of the known DISC1 interactome are expressed in lymphoblastoid cell lines. We conjectured that a global analysis of normal variance in gene expression in lymphoblastoid cells might provide useful self-standing insights into pathway biology and complement clinically and technically challenging limitations of comparative post-mortem brain expression studies . We have therefore mined publicly available expression data derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines of HapMap individuals for significant alterations in genome wide gene expression levels, mediated by genetic variations in the DISC1 pathway. We confirm the involvement of DISC1, NDE1, PDE4B and PDE4D in cytoskeletal, synaptogenic and neurodevelopmental functions, and provide new evidence that this pathway may also play a role in sensory perception.
Previous studies have shown that expression levels of full length DISC1 are reduced by half in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from t(1;11) cases  and that S704C missense variants alter binding of NDEL1 , arguing that altering either the quality or the quantity of DISC1 can be pathognomonic But, as yet, there have been no studies to determine whether the cellular effects of these alternative genetic mechanisms are fundamentally similar or distinct. To address this, we devised a data mining and integration strategy, summarized in Figure 1. First, we examined the effect of a) six novel variants shown here to exert an effect in cis on DISC1 expression b) three common missense variants R264Q (rs3738401), L607F (rs6675281) and S704C (rs821616), c) the 3 SNPs, rs1538979, rs821577 and rs821633, reported to show interplay conferring ‘risk’, ‘neutral’ and ‘protective’ effects on schizophrenia and bipolar disorder  and d) variants previously reported as associated with schizophrenia or related psychotic traits in European cohorts for the DISC1 interactors NDE1, NDEL1, PDE4B and PDE4D.
This protocol can be adapted to any chosen gene, pathway and disorder by simply replacing DISC1 with the gene of primary interest.
Novel DISC1 cis-acting variants were identified by testing SNPs from 10 kb upstream of the immediately adjacent gene TSNAX to 10 kb downstream of DISC1 for association to expression values of DISC1. Expression values were from four publicly available data sets (GSE6536 in NCBI GEO) drawn from a common set of 210 lymphoblastoid cell lines from the four HapMap population cohorts; 60 CEU, 60 YRI, 45 CHB and 45 JPT . Of the 754 variants tested, only one, rs1765778, located 30 kb upstream of DISC1, displayed significant association in all four populations (p-value range = 0.049−0.0094). A further 5 SNPs displayed significant association (p<0.05) in three of the four populations, the common exception being the Japanese population. One of these five SNPs, rs3738398 is located 221 bp upstream of the DISC1 start site and 75 bp upstream of the CpG island that spans exon 1 of DISC1, suggesting that these variants may be representing the as yet undefined promoter region of DISC1. All six variants locate within the same CEU D′ haplotype block, which is also the longest haplotype block of the four populations (Figure S1 and Table S1), and have an average r2 between them of 0.69, and a maximum r2 of 0.87 between rs1765778 and rs1655297. In all six instances, the minor alleles were associated with decreased DISC1 expression. Carriers of the minor alleles in the CEU cohort have, on average, a reduction of 14.81% (95% CI = 13.96–15.66) in DISC1 expression, whilst homozygotes of the minor alleles have on average a 18.97% (95% CI = 17.84–20.10) reduction.
We then tested by ANOVA the genotypes of the three missense polymorphisms, the three genetic interplay variants (comparing ‘risk’, ‘neutral’ and ‘protective’ genotypes), and the six cis-acting variants for global effects on gene expression (Table S2). This used public datasets from three studies that used the CEU population –, with each study using a different sub-cohort of individuals and different platform to measure expression levels. Only those genes that were significantly differentially expressed (p<0.05) and in the same direction across all array test platforms were considered for gene ontology analysis (materials and methods & Table S3). To test for shared effects down-stream of DISC1, the same global analysis was performed on other members of the DISC1 pathway for which variants had previously been reported as associated with schizophrenia or related psychotic traits in European cohorts. These comprised: for NDE1, 4 SNPs and 1 haplotype; for NDEL1, 1 SNP and 1 haplotype; for PDE4B, 3 SNPs and 2 haplotypes; and for PDE4D, 1 SNP and 1 haplotype , (Text S1 and Table S2).
Of the total 77154 gene targets represented by all three platforms, 13145 genes are targeted by more than one experiment. Using the 5% level, we expected 25.71 changes per variant tested in the cross-sample analysis performed (Table S3). Greater than expected numbers of genes affected were seen for eight of the fourteen variants tested, three of them significantly greater at the 0.05 level. These were DISC1 rs3738401 (R264Q) (n = 47, p = 0.012); NDE1 SNPs rs4781678 (n = 39), rs2242549 (n = 29), rs881803 (n = 52, p = 0.0028); the NDE1 tagging haplotype (n = 36); the PDE4B SNP rs7412571 (n = 83, p = 0.000000037) and haplotype (n = 31); and the PDE4D haplotype (n = 36) (Table S3).
528 genes (4.02% of all targets represented on multiple array platforms) were differentially expressed across all variants tested (Table S3). Of these, 17 genes (3.21%) were influenced by variants in more than one DISC1 pathway gene. Of the total 178 genes identified by all DISC1 variants, 11 (6.17%) were also identified by variants in the other DISC1 pathway genes. Expression of TUBB3 was uniquely affected by both regulatory and missense DISC1 variants. 35 of the 528 genes (6.63%) have pre-existing supporting evidence for a role in psychosis. Seven genes, ATF7IP, BCR, CLU, DYNLL1, FEZ1, SNAP91 and SYN2, are interactors of DISC1 or the extended DISC1 pathway . Seven genes, APP , ERBB3 , FEZ1 , HSPA2 , SERPINI1 , SOX10  and SYN2 , display altered expression in studies of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Six genes, CLOCK , FEZ1, GRIA3, NOTCH4, SYN2, and TACR1, have been reported associated with schizophrenia (www.schizophreniaforum.org/res/sczgene/default.asp; ) or bipolar disorder. Fifteen genes, ALKBH4 , BCR , CD160 , DAZ3 , GJA5 , , IL9R , KIF13A , MGLL , NLGN4Y , PRKY , RGS12 , SCHIP1 , USP7 , VCY  and ZNF140 , are subject to copy number variation in individuals with schizophrenia. Further, the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) database identifies 139 genes as being targets for drugs for psychiatric illness. Of these 139, the expression of seven genes (5%), namely CA12, CHRNA5, GRIA3, HTR3A, SCN9A, TUBB3 and TUBD1 were altered by the presence of DISC1 pathway variants (number expected by chance to be observed on multiple platforms and be a known drug target = 0.29; p = 0.0074 (Table 1). Only the DISC1 variant rs3738401 (R264Q) affected more than one of these target genes, significantly altering the expression levels of CHRNA5, TUBB3 and TUBD1. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) also enabled additional exploration of how the identified genes relate to DISC1 and the DISC1 pathway. Using the build function and connecting the 528 genes to the core DISC1 interactome, only allowing for direct interaction, 100 (18.94%) genes can be generated into a network (Figure 2) with relationships supported by at least 1 reference from the literature, from a textbook, or from canonical information stored in the Ingenuity knowledge base.
Network generated through the use of Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity Systems®, www.ingenuity.com), using the build function and connecting the identified genes to the core DISC1 interactome, only allowing for direct interaction. Relationships are supported by at least 1 reference from the literature, from a textbook, or from canonical information stored in the Ingenuity knowledge base.
To determine whether these 10 DISC1 and 14 DISC1 pathway variants identified convergent biological pathways, the gene ontology (GO) tree machine  was used to test for over abundance of similar functions (Table S4). GO term searches were performed on gene sets identified by a) individual variants that exceeded the expectation level, b) multiple variants in linkage disequilibrium with each other (that is all DISC1 ‘cis’ variants, and all NDE1 variants) and c) variants in different DISC1 pathway genes (all major mental illness associated variants, and all variants). Significant enrichment was observed for: cytoskeletal functions (DISC1, rs3738401 (p-value range, 0.0047−0.00039) and NDE1, haplotype (p-value range, 0.0060−0.0010)), synaptogenesis (PDE4B, rs7412571 (p-value = 0.0035)), transcription factor activity (DISC1, rs3738401 (p-value = 0.010) PDE4B rs7412571 (p-value range, 0.0053−0.0048)) and sensory perception (NDE1, rs881803 (p-value = 0.0038). Cytoskeletal functions and synaptogenesis have already been identified as functions of the DISC1 pathway . Cytoskeletal functions were also highlighted with DISC1 ‘cis’ variants, ‘all DISC1 pathway variants’ and ‘all associated variants’. Nervous system development is also a predicted function of the DISC1 pathway  and was affected here by the PDE4B haplotype comprising rs2503166, rs583018 and rs526772 (p-value = 0.0014). Additionally, the gene lists for the DISC1 ‘cis’ variants, rs6541280 and rs823167, were also enriched for sensory perception gene ontology terms despite affecting fewer genes than would be expected by chance. When genes identified by associating variants in more than one DISC1 pathway member were considered, there was a significant over representation of genes involved in cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis. When all DISC1 missense and regulatory variants were added to the analysis, GO term enrichment was observed for neurotransmitter receptor activity and in G-protein coupled peptide receptor activity (Table 2, Figure S2 and Table S4). Our analysis also supports previous suggestions ,  that mutations affecting either the quality or quantity of DISC1 may have subtly different phenotypic and pathogenic consequences.
Our study has highlighted the role of six DISC1 cis-variants in significantly altering the expression levels of the DISC1 gene in a semi-dominant fashion (15% average reduction in heterozygotes versus 19% in homozygotes). The reductions of DISC1 gene expression levels, although modest, may, through the hub function of DISC1, exert subtle but pervasive, and thus neurodevelopmentally and physiologically relevant, effects.
Further, our analysis has added to the evidence for the DISC1 pathway having a role in the regulation of cytoskeletal function, synaptogenesis, and neurodevelopment  and sensory perception. This evidence pertains to normal variance in gene expression, but may also be clinically relevant and could be tested by association studies of target genes and expression studies of post-mortem brain tissue. Intriguingly, ‘cAMP mediated signaling’ appears as an overrepresented term for the NDE1 variant rs4781678 (Table S4) and not, as might have been expected, for a PDE4B or PDE4D variant. We have however recently demonstrated that DISC1, PDE4 and NDE1 co-associate and co-localize at the synapse, suggesting a role for NDE1 in co-modulating PDE4 dependent cAMP levels . Sensory perception is a novel, emergent finding that fits well with the underlying concepts in psychosis of altered perception and salience . This finding provides a new avenue for experimentation, for example in the analysis of mice mutant for Disc1 pathway genes –.
The identification of seven psychoactive drug targets is noteworthy. To the best of our knowledge, these were identified and developed without any prior knowledge of a biological link to the DISC1 pathway per se. We argue from this that the DISC1 pathway offers a valid and circumscribed target for additional drug target development. Moreover and importantly, our analysis suggests that DISC1 pathway variant profiling may serve as a useful predictor of individual response to a given therapeutic.
The approach we have taken (Figure 1) can be adapted to any chosen gene or pathway. We suggest that this may prove a useful strategy for independent evaluation of candidate genes, their likely contribution to disease variance, their potential utility as therapeutic targets and as predictors of response to treatment.
Materials and Methods
Multiple publicly available data sets were used to test the effects of genetic variants on genome-wide gene expression levels. Genotype and phased haplotype data were collected from the HapMap project (; www.hapmap.org/), whilst expression data were collected from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ ) for studies that have used lymphoblastoid cell lines, where the individuals used partially or completely overlapped with the individuals included in the HapMap project.
The expression data came from three independent laboratories and can be obtained from the NCBI GEO database under the following identification codes: GDS2106 , GDS1048 , and GSE6536 . One group had performed a replication analysis for their samples (GDS2106), which we used here as a fourth comparator being a technical replicate for the observations in GDS2106. Data were derived from different gene chip platforms: GDS2106 used Affymetrix GeneChip Human HG-Focus Target Array, GDS1048 used a Rosetta platform, and GSE6536 used the Illumina Sentrix Human-6 Expression BeadChip. The Affymetrix platform was re-annotated using a custom GeneChip library file (CDF file) . Each study tested a different and partially overlapping sub-set of the CEU individuals (Figure S3).
All variants considered to be ‘cis’ to the DISC1 gene (HapMap Build 35 co-ordinates, Chr1:227961133..228493750, 10 kb upstream of the immediately adjacent gene TSNAX to 10 kb downstream of DISC1) were tested for association to variance in the expression levels of DISC1 using the one-way ANOVA function in SPSS (version 14.0 for Windows). This was performed for all four HapMap populations using the expression data from the GEO dataset GSE6536. It was predicted that if a genomic area truly regulates DISC1 expression, then that region would be detected to associate in all populations. These findings were mapped back on to the linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure of this region. The pattern of LD was defined using the solid spine of LD (D′>0.8) to form haplotype blocks. Neighboring haplotype blocks with a Hedrick's multiallelic D′>0.9  were joined to form one haplotype block.
Tests for association between genetic variants and gene expression were performed using the MA-ANOVA program in R, for each variant (n = 24) on each platform (n = 4, total of 96 genome wide analyses). The datasets ranged from 24 to 60 individuals analyzed. To take account of these multiple tests and between study variables, only those genes that displayed significant differences in expression (p<0.05) in all datasets on which it was measured and which changed in the same direction were considered robust and taken forward. This produced a list of genes that were differentially expressed for each DISC1 pathway variant. To determine whether the number of genes observed was greater than that expected by chance we calculated how many genes would be expected to show affected expression using a the 5% level for each platform. Since we were only looking for genes replicated across platforms we used an expected level of 0.25% (0.05×0.05) for genes on two platforms (10249 genes: 0.05×0.05×10249 = 25.62), an expected level of 0.0125% (0.05×0.05×0.05) for genes on three platforms (545 genes: 0.05×0.05×0.05×545 = 0.068) and an expected level of 0.000625% (0.05×0.05×0.05×0.05) for genes on four platforms (2351 genes: 0.05×0.05×0.05×0.05×2351 = 0.015). This resulted in an expected value of 25.71 genes identified per variant.
Gene Ontology Analysis
The list of genes differentially expressed for each variant was uploaded into the web based Gene Ontology Tree Machine (; http://bioinfo.vanderbilt.edu/gotm/ ) and the hypergeometric test utilized by GOTM to test for over representation of genes of similar function. GOTM tests were also applied to gene lists identified by more than one variant within the following categories, a) DISC1 expression altering variants, b) NDE1 variants, c) all variants that associate with major mental illness, d) all variants from the DISC1 pathway. The list of observed differentially expressed genes was compared to a reference gene list of all genes that had targets on multiple platforms, to determine if there was significant enrichment of gene ontology terms. The GOTM website is updated periodically and can not be searched using prior data assemblies. The analysis performed here was on the data assembly as it stood on 8th May 2008.
Illustration from the UCSC genome browser to show the locations of the DISC1 cis SNPs tested for association to DISC1 expression in relation to the LD structure in the four populations, the location of the DISC1 coding sequence and potential regulatory elements. Track 1, shows UCSC chromosomal location from the March 2006 build. Track 2 shows the chromosomal band. Track 3 shows the location of DISC1. Tracks 4, 6, 8 and 10 show the LD block structure in the four populations (alternating colors are for clarity). Tracks 5, 7, 9 and 11 show the SNPs used in the analysis and whether they associated below the 0.05 level of significance (Black SNPs are significant at the 0.05 level, Grey SNPs are not). Tracks 12 to 14 show the locations of potential regulatory elements in this region. a) Whole region analyzed. b) Close up of the 5′ end of DISC1 where consistent significant findings were observed.
(2.69 MB TIF)
Gene ontology tree illustrations, parts a) to w), from the Gene Ontology Tree Machine (; http://bioinfo.vanderbilt.edu/gotm/ ) for the genes identified to be significantly differentially expressed by each variant and the four variant groupings used in this study. Ontological functions illustrated in red are significantly over represented in the genes whose expression levels are altered by that variant. a) DISC1 rs1765778 b) DISC1 rs1025526 c) DISC1 rs6541280 d) DISC1 rs3738398 e) DISC1 rs823167 f) DISC1 rs3738401 g) DISC1 rs821616 h) DISC1 interplay model i) NDE1 rs4781678 j) NDE1 rs2242549 k) NDE1 rs881803 l) NDE1 rs2075512 m) NDE1 haplotype n) NDEL1 haplotype o) PDE4B haplotype (Haplotype of rs4503327, rs2503222 and rs6588186) p) PDE4B rs7412571 q) PDE4B Haplotype (Haplotype of rs2503166, rs583018 and rs526772) r) PDE4B rs2503177 s) PDE4D rs1120303 t) DISC1 overlapping genes for DISC1 expression altering variants u) NDE1 overlapping genes v) DISC1 pathway associating variants overlapping genes w) DISC1 pathway all variants overlapping genes. 1.→Zhang B, Schmoyer D, Kirov S, Snoddy J (2004) GOTree Machine (GOTM): a web-based platform for interpreting sets of interesting genes using Gene Ontology hierarchies. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 16.
(10.22 MB TIF)
Venn diagram of the numbers of overlapping CEU individuals in the three publicly available expression datasets.
(1.48 MB TIF)
Table to show the association between cis variants of DISC1 and DISC1 gene expression in the four HapMap populations. P-values in bold are below 0.05.
(0.12 MB XLS)
Variants from the DISC1 pathway used in analysis of correlations with global gene expression levels.
(0.02 MB XLS)
Table to show the number of genes significantly altered by each variant and the direction and fold change of effect for each gene.
(0.18 MB XLS)
Table to show the gene ontology terms that are significantly enriched in the gene lists for each variant and the four groupings of variants.
(0.03 MB XLS)
Unpublished article. Tomppo L, Hennah W, Lahermo P, Loukola A, Tuulio-Henriksson A, et al. (2009) Genes of the DISC1 Pathways in the Etiology of Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry: (in press)
(0.81 MB PDF)
Conceived and designed the experiments: WH DP. Performed the experiments: WH. Analyzed the data: WH. Wrote the paper: WH DP.
- 1. Harrison PJ, Weinberger DR (2005) Schizophrenia genes, gene expression, and neuropathology: on the matter of their convergence. Mol Psychiatry 10: 40–68.
- 2. Shi J, Gershon ES, Liu C (2008) Genetic associations with schizophrenia: Meta-analyses of 12 candidate genes. Schizophr Res 104: 96–107.
- 3. Bray NJ (2008) Gene expression in the etiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 34: 412–418.
- 4. Stranger BE, Nica AC, Forrest MS, Dimas A, Bird CP, et al. (2007) Population genomics of human gene expression. Nat Genet 39: 1217–1224.
- 5. Chubb JE, Bradshaw NJ, Soares DC, Porteous DJ, Millar JK (2008) The DISC locus in psychiatric illness. Mol Psychiatry 13: 36–64.
- 6. Clapcote SJ, Lipina TV, Millar JK, Mackie S, Christie S, et al. (2007) Behavioral phenotypes of Disc1 missense mutations in mice. Neuron 54: 387–402.
- 7. Hikida T, Jaaro-Peled H, Seshadri S, Oishi K, Hookway C, et al. (2007) Dominant-negative DISC1 transgenic mice display schizophrenia-associated phenotypes detected by measures translatable to humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 14501–14506.
- 8. Kamiya A, Kubo K, Tomoda T, Takaki M, Youn R, et al. (2005) A schizophrenia-associated mutation of DISC1 perturbs cerebral cortex development. Nat Cell Biol 7: 1167–1178.
- 9. Li W, Zhou Y, Jentsch JD, Brown RA, Tian X, et al. (2007) Specific developmental disruption of disrupted-in-schizophrenia-1 function results in schizophrenia-related phenotypes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 18280–18285.
- 10. Hennah W, Thomson P, McQuillin A, Bass N, Loukola A, et al. (2008) DISC1 Association, Heterogeneity and Interplay in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. Molecular Psychiatry. (epub ahead of print).
- 11. Hennah W, Tomppo L, Hiekkalinna T, Palo OM, Kilpinen H, et al. (2007) Families with the risk allele of DISC1 reveal a link between schizophrenia and another component of the same molecular pathway, NDE1. Hum Mol Genet 16: 453–462.
- 12. Pickard BS, Thomson PA, Christoforou A, Evans KL, Morris SW, et al. (2007) The PDE4B gene confers sex-specific protection against schizophrenia. Psychiatr Genet 17: 129–133.
- 13. Sullivan PF, Fan C, Perou CM (2006) Evaluating the comparability of gene expression in blood and brain. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 141B: 261–268.
- 14. Millar JK, Pickard BS, Mackie S, James R, Christie S, et al. (2005) DISC1 and PDE4B are interacting genetic factors in schizophrenia that regulate cAMP signaling. Science 310: 1187–1191.
- 15. Lipska BK, Peters T, Hyde TM, Halim N, Horowitz C, et al. (2006) Expression of DISC1 binding partners is reduced in schizophrenia and associated with DISC1 SNPs. Hum Mol Genet 15: 1245–1258.
- 16. Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Dunning M, Ingle CE, Beazley C, et al. (2007) Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science 315: 848–853.
- 17. Cheung VG, Spielman RS, Ewens KG, Weber TM, Morley M, et al. (2005) Mapping determinants of human gene expression by regional and genome-wide association. Nature 437: 1365–1369.
- 18. Monks SA, Leonardson A, Zhu H, Cundiff P, Pietrusiak P, et al. (2004) Genetic inheritance of gene expression in human cell lines. Am J Hum Genet 75: 1094–1105.
- 19. Carter CJ (2006) Schizophrenia susceptibility genes converge on interlinked pathways related to glutamatergic transmission and long-term potentiation, oxidative stress and oligodendrocyte viability. Schizophr Res 86: 1–14.
- 20. Hakak Y, Walker JR, Li C, Wong WH, Davis KL, et al. (2001) Genome-wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-related genes in chronic schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4746–4751.
- 21. Carter CJ (2007) eIF2B and oligodendrocyte survival: where nature and nurture meet in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia? Schizophr Bull 33: 1343–1353.
- 22. Vawter MP, Thatcher L, Usen N, Hyde TM, Kleinman JE, et al. (2002) Reduction of synapsin in the hippocampus of patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 7: 571–578.
- 23. Takao T, Tachikawa H, Kawanishi Y, Mizukami K, Asada T (2007) CLOCK gene T3111C polymorphism is associated with Japanese schizophrenics: a preliminary study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17: 273–276.
- 24. Walsh T, McClellan JM, McCarthy SE, Addington AM, Pierce SB, et al. (2008) Rare structural variants disrupt multiple genes in neurodevelopmental pathways in schizophrenia. Science 320: 539–543.
- 25. International Schizophrenia Consortium (2008) Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia. Nature 455: 237–241.
- 26. Xu B, Roos JL, Levy S, van Rensburg EJ, Gogos JA, et al. (2008) Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with sporadic schizophrenia. Nat Genet 40: 880–885.
- 27. Zhang B, Schmoyer D, Kirov S, Snoddy J (2004) GOTree Machine (GOTM): a web-based platform for interpreting sets of interesting genes using Gene Ontology hierarchies. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 16.
- 28. Porteous DJ, Millar JK (2006) Disrupted in schizophrenia 1: building brains and memories. Trends Mol Med 12: 255–261.
- 29. Bradshaw NJ, Ogawa F, Antolin-Fontes B, Chubb JE, Carlyle BC, et al. (2008) DISC1, PDE4B, and NDE1 at the Centrosome and Synapse. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
- 30. Kapur S (2003) Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 160: 13–23.
- 31. The HapMap Consortium (2005) A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437: 1299–1320.
- 32. Dai M, Wang P, Boyd AD, Kostov G, Athey B, et al. (2005) Evolving gene/transcript definitions significantly alter the interpretation of GeneChip data. Nucleic Acids Res 33: e175.
- 33. Hedrick PW (1987) Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. Genetics 117: 331–341.