To determine clinical outcomes and cure rates for M.genitalium genital infection in men and women following azithromycin 1 g.
Patients attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre between March 2005 and November 2007 with urethritis/epididymitis, cervicitis/pelvic inflammatory disease and sexual contacts of M.genitalium were tested for M.genitalium by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). M.genitalium-infection was treated with 1 g of azithromycin and a test-of-cure (toc) was performed one month post-azithromycin. Response to azithromycin, and response to moxifloxacin (400 mg daily for 10 days) in individuals with persistent infection post-azithromycin, was determined.
Of 1538 males and 313 females tested, 161 males (11%) and 30 females (10%) were infected with M.genitalium. A toc was available on 131 (69%) infected individuals (median = 36 days [range 12-373]). Of 120 individuals prescribed azithromycin only pre-toc, M.genitalium was eradicated in 101 (84%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 77–90%) and persisted in 19 (16%, 95% CI: 10–23%). Eleven individuals with persistent infection (9%, 95% CI: 5–15%) had no risk of reinfection from untreated-partners, while eight (7%, 95% CI: 3–12%) may have been at risk of reinfection from doxycycline-treated or untreated-partners. Moxifloxacin was effective in eradicating persistent infection in all cases not responding to azithromycin. Patients with persistent-M.genitalium were more likely to experience persistent symptoms (91%), compared to patients in whom M.genitalium was eradicated (17%), p<0.0001.
Use of azithromycin 1 g in M.genitalium-infected patients was associated with unacceptable rates of persistent infection, which was eradicated with moxifloxacin. These findings highlight the importance of follow-up in M.genitalium-infected patients prescribed azithromycin, and the need to monitor for the development of resistance. Research to determine optimal first and second-line therapeutic agents for M.genitalium is needed.
Citation: Bradshaw CS, Chen MY, Fairley CK (2008) Persistence of Mycoplasma genitalium Following Azithromycin Therapy. PLoS ONE 3(11): e3618. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003618
Editor: Patricia Kissinger, Tulane University, United States of America
Received: July 15, 2008; Accepted: October 14, 2008; Published: November 3, 2008
Copyright: © 2008 Bradshaw et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: CSB holds a National Medical and Research Council Research Fellowship, Grant ID 465164.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
M.genitalium is a cause of urethritis in men and cervicitis in women , has been isolated from women with endometritis and salpingitis, and has been implicated in tubal factor infertility , , , , . In vitro studies have shown that M.genitalium is most susceptible to macrolides, particularly to azithromycin, but that it has reduced susceptibility to tetracyclines and some fluoroquinolones , . Clinical studies using doxycycline and levofloxacin also show significant failure rates following these therapies , , , , , . Two trials have compared azithromycin to doxycycline for the treatment of M. genitalium. In both of these, 1 g of azithromycin was shown to be more effective (84–85%) than 7–9 days of doxycyline (35–36%) , . In 53 individuals failing doxycycline, an extended course of azithromycin (500 mg followed by 250 mg daily for 4 days) eradicated M. genitalium in 47 men (96%) and 6 (100%) women. However, extended azithromycin therapy was not statistically superior to azithromycin 1 g .
Current international guidelines recommend azithromycin 1 g as first-line therapy for uncomplicated M.genitalium infection ; however second-line agents have not been extensively evaluated. Importantly, azithromycin 1 g is also first-line therapy for non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in most countries, resulting in a high proportion of patients with symptomatic M.genitalium-positive NGU receiving azithromycin presumptively. In 2006 we reported high rates of treatment failure following azithromycin 1 g in men with M.genitalium-associated urethritis (28%, 95% confidence interval (CI),15–45%) . Reduced susceptibility to azithromycin of these isolates demonstrated that azithromycin-resistance rather than re-infection was responsible for treatment failure, and that test positivity was not due to detection of persistent non-viable DNA. M. genitalium was successfully eradicated in all men experiencing azithromycin failure using 400 mg daily of moxifloxacin for 10 days.
In this study, we aimed to determine likely levels of azithromycin treatment failure using a large number of M. genitalium-infected individuals. Furthermore, we sought to determine the clinical characteristics of individuals infected with M.genitalium, including those who failed to respond to azithromycin, and to examine treatment response to moxifloxacin in those in whom azithromycin did not eradicate infection. Establishing levels of azithromycin resistance and effective second-line agents for the treatment of M.genitalium is of considerable clinical and public health importance to the field.
This study was undertaken at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) between March 2005 and November 2007. During that period, routine testing for M.genitalium was undertaken for urethritis, epididymitis, cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and for sexual contacts of M.genitalium-infected men and women. First pass urine samples or urethral swabs were recommended for testing for M.genitalium in males, and cervical swabs were recommended for testing in females, unless clinician or patient preference necessitated high vaginal or first pass urine samples to be obtained from females. Standardized epidemiological and clinical data were collected electronically at the time testing for M.genitalium was undertaken.
M.genitalium-infected men and women were treated with azithromycin 1 g. All patients were asked to notify sexual partner(s) to obtain testing and treatment. A routine test-of-cure (toc) was recommended one month following azithromycin. Clinic nurses contacted patients fortnightly on up to three occasions if they had not attended for the toc. In those testing positive 3 weeks or more following treatment, and where reinfection was considered unlikely, moxifloxacin 400 mg daily for 10 days was administered, with another toc one month after treatment with moxifloxacin.
Male contacts of men with M.genitalium were screened for M.genitalium using throat, rectal and first-void urine samples. Female contacts were tested using cervical, vaginal or first-void urine samples. Contacts received presumptive treatment with azithromycin 1 g, unless their partner had failed azithromycin therapy in the absence of reinfection. In such cases, moxifloxacin was administered. Testing for M.genitalium was by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) according to the method described by Yoshida et al. .
Data on the number of patients tested for M.genitalium, the proportions testing positive, and demographic and behavioural characteristics were analysed. Case files were reviewed in individuals who tested positive for M.genitalium to establish the treatment(s) prescribed to the index and sexual contacts, and the clinical outcomes following treatment. Data were obtained to determine the clinical characteristics of individuals in whom M.genitalium persisted, the likelihood of reinfection from untreated partners, and the response to treatment with moxifloxacin in those failing to respond to azithromycin. Treatment outcomes following azithromycin were recorded as eradication of M.genitalium if it was not detected at toc1, or persistent infection with or without risk of reinfection from sexual partners. All individuals in this study had attended for medical care at MSHC. In line with the policy of our institutional ethics committee and guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, consent and ethics approval were not required, as this was an analysis of routinely collected clinical data. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 15, Chicago, USA). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for proportions. Differences between categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test where appropriate. Patients were excluded from the analysis where information or specimens were not available.
During the study period, 1538 men and 313 women were tested for M.genitalium: 191 (10%) tested positive for M.genitalium (161 males [11%] and 30 females [10%]), 1660 (89%) patients tested negative, and 5 (0.2%) had specimens that were repeatedly unassessable. There were no significant differences in demographic, behavioural or clinical characteristics between infected and uninfected men and women other than infected individuals were more likely than uninfected to identify as a contact of M.genitalium (data not shown), p<0.01.
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of M.genitalium-infected patients
Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of M.genitalium-infected men and women, the specimens used to detect M.genitalium, and the presence of genital coinfections. The median duration of symptoms prior to presentation for males and females was 7 days (range 1–120) and 10 days (range 1–360) respectively. Urethral smears for Gram stain were obtained on 139 (86%) men with urethral M.genitalium; 89 (64%) had ≥5 polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) per high power field on urethral smear. Vaginal and cervical PMN counts were only available on 19 (60%) and 16 (57%) women respectively; of these, 10 (52%) had ≥5 PMN per high power field on vaginal smear and 10 (63%) had ≥5 PMN per high power field on cervical smear.
Treatment outcomes following azithromycin
A toc was available for 131 (69%) M.genitalium-infected individuals after treatment (110 males and 21 females). The median time to returning for the first toc (toc1) was 36 days (range 12–373); 119 (91%) patients returned within 12 weeks of treatment. One hundred and twenty (92%) of these patients had been treated with azithromycin 1 g only prior to toc. Eleven participants (8%), however, were also treated with moxifloxacin for persistent urethral symptoms in the interval following azithromycin but prior to toc1.
Of the 120 patients (102 males and 18 females) treated with azithromycin 1 g who proceeded to toc1, 101 (84%, 95%CI: 77–90%) did not have persistence of M.genitalium. In 19 (16%, 95% CI: 10–23%) patients treated with azithromycin, M.genitalium persisted at toc1; 11 (9%, 95% CI: 5–15%) were considered by clinicians to not be at risk of reinfection (no sex since treatment or sex with a partner who had been concurrently treated with azithromycin 1 g), Table 2. Eight (7%, 95% CI: 3–12%) patients with a positive toc1 were considered as possibly at risk of reinfection from an untreated or doxycyline-treated partner. Reinfection risk was not consistently documented by clinicians for patients with negative toc1s, so while it would have been helpful to compare reinfection risk in those cured and not cured of M.genitalium-infection with azithromycin 1 g, these data were not available.
M.genitalium was not detected at toc1 in the additional 11 (8%, 95% CI: 5–14%) patients who received moxifloxacin post-azithromycin but prior to toc1, Table 2. They had been given moxifloxacin at prior to toc1 as they had either already received azithromycin from a physician prior to their presentation but were still symptomatic and tested positive for M.genitalium upon attending MSHC (n = 4), or had received azithromycin at presentation to MSHC (n = 7) but had persistent symptoms and were given moxifloxacin prior to toc1. Of the individuals given moxifloxacin pre-toc1 only one had had contact with an untreated partner and may have been at risk of reinfection, the remainder had been celibate or had only had sex with an azithromycin-treated partner.
Data on symptoms at toc1 were available on 119 (91%) patients. Patients with M.genitalium detected at toc1 were significantly more likely to report persistence of symptoms (91%), compared to patients in whom M.genitalium was not detected (17%), p<0.0001. There was no difference in the proportion of males (23%) compared to females (24%) with persistence of M.genitalium post-azithromycin or requiring moxifloxacin prior to toc1 for persistent symptoms. However, heterosexual males were more likely to experience azithromycin failure or to require moxifloxacin for persistent symptoms prior to toc1 (28%) compared to men who have sex with men (MSM),11%, p = 0.04. Sex with a partner from overseas (predominantly Asia) was reported in 20% of patients failing azithromycin or requiring moxifloxacin prior to toc1, compared to only 9% of patients in whom azithromycin eradicated infection, however, this was not statistically significant, p = 0.11. Heterosexual males (19%) were not more likely than MSM (15%) to have had a partner from overseas.
Of the 19 individuals with M.genitalium detected at toc1, 10 provided a second toc (toc2), Figure 1. Six patients with persistent M.genitalium-infection had no risk of reinfection from an untreated sexual partner; 5 had sexual partners who been treated concurrently with azithromycin on one or more occasions, and one had remained celibate. Notably, in three couples simultaneous administration of azithromycin to sexual partners on two consecutive occasions failed to eradicate M.genitalium, and it was only when both index and partner were concurrently treated with moxifloxacin did a third toc show that M.genitalium had been eradicated. Four patients with persistent infection post-azithromycin may have been at risk of reinfection from an untreated or doxycyline treated partner. Importantly, moxifloxacin eradicated persistent infection following azithromycin in all cases.
* = cases with no risk of reinfection from untreated sexual partner, d = days, C1 = case 1, C2 = case 2, (A1) = first occasion 1 g azithromycin administered, (A2) = second occasion 1 g azithromycin administered, (M1) = first occasion 400 mg daily of moxifloxacin for 10 days administered, (D1) = first occasion 100 mg bd doxycycline for 7 days administered, SP = sexual partner, no Rx = no treatment administered, toc1 = first test of cure for case, toc2 = second test of cure for case, + = positive, − = negative, NA = not available, #sp not retreated with azithromycin after first occasion, ? = treatment advised but could not be verified.
This large series provides strong evidence that azithromycin fails to clear M.genitalium in a considerable proportion of infected men and women. In only 84% (95% CI: 77–90%) of infected cases treated with azithromycin 1 g was M.genitalium eradicated, while infection persisted in 16% of cases; 9% of whom had no risk of reinfection from untreated partners. In an additional 11 (8%) cases use of moxifloxacin preceding toc prevented assessment of azithromycin efficacy; however, moxifloxacin had been prescribed by clinicians for reasons related to probable azithromycin-resistance in the index or their partner. Importantly, moxifloxacin 400 mg daily for 10 days was effective in eradicating persistent infection in all cases in this series who failed to respond to azithromycin, providing further data to support the efficacy of this agent in persistent infection. There was no difference in persistence of M.genitalium following azithromycin between males and females; however, heterosexual males, were more likely than MSM to experience persistence of M.genitalium following azithromycin therapy.
We previously reported an azithromycin-failure rate of 28% (95% CI: 15–45%) in men with M.genitalium urethritis . The numbers in this study were small (n = 32) and the confidence intervals were wide, but reinfection risk was carefully assessed, and no patients had been re-infected or prescribed moxifloxacin prior to a toc being obtained. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of M.genitalium isolates showed increased mean inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to azithromycin >16 mg/l and susceptibility to moxifloxacin (MIC range 0.031–0.125 mg/l). Mutations in region V of the 23S rRNA gene were identified and explained the mechanism of resistance . In this current study we report an azithromycin-failure rate of 16% (95%CI: 10–23%), which may be conservative as it excludes the additional 8% of cases who clinicians felt were experiencing azithromycin-failure and who were treated with moxifloxacin prior to obtaining a toc. While the failure rates differ somewhat in the two series, the confidence intervals overlap and are considerably narrower in the larger series. Most importantly, current clinical expectations are that therapeutic agents for STIs should not be less than 95% effective. Our findings support those of published studies that indicate 1 g of azithromycin at best eradicates M.genitalium in only 84–85% of treated patients , .
Detection of M.genitalium by PCR in the early days following therapy may reflect detection of non-viable DNA, and the interval at which to perform a toc for M.genitalium following therapy has not been well established. Studies indicate that detection of non-viable C.trachomatis DNA following treatment falls over 1–2 weeks ; however there are no data available for M.genitalium. A significantly higher proportion of cases with persistent detection of M.genitalium DNA experienced persistent symptoms (91%) compared to those with negative tocs (17%), indicating, as was found in our previous research, that a positive toc is likely to reflect clinical disease persistence rather than detection of non-viable DNA .
Recent studies have shown that M.genitalium is capable of producing chronic infections in humans , and have focused on potential mechanisms of resistance. It appears that M.genitalium can undergo extensive gene sequence variation within a persistently infected individual , , , . While mutations have been identified to explain the mechanism by which azithromycin resistance occurs , ongoing research indicates that resistance may develop in vivo after both single-dose and extended regimens of azithromycin (personal communication, Jorgen Jensen), suggesting that widespread use of 1 g of azithromycin may be contributing to the development of azithromycin-resistant M.genitalium.
There were some clear limitations to this study. This was a series of patients attending an STD clinic with specific indications for testing for M.genitalium. In this population, 11% of men and 10% of women selectively tested for M.genitalium were infected. These findings are relevant to symptomatic patients, but may not be generalisable to unselected, asymptomatic individuals. Only sixty-nine percent of patients testing positive for M.genitalium re-attended for toc1, compared >90% in our previous study; it is possible that men who re-attended were more likely to be experiencing persistent symptoms and infection compared to those lost to follow-up. Risk of reinfection relies on patient report, and may be unreliable. However, careful documentation of reinfection risk was undertaken in those with persistent M.genitalium due to attempts to limit inappropriate prescription of moxifloxacin.
The findings from this study highlight a number of important aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of M.genitalium. Mounting data suggest that while azithromycin 1 g is moderately effective, and superior to doxycyline, it is associated with unacceptable rates of disease persistence, and its widespread use could be selecting for resistance. In vitro data indicates that M.genitalium is highly sensitive to moxifloxacin, and it appears to be effective in individuals experiencing azithromycin failure; however, it is costly and there is a significant risk of the development of resistance if used inappropriately. As azithromycin is an effective, well-tolerated, single-dose therapy for NGU and cervicitis it is administered presumptively in many clinical settings, exposing a significant proportion of symptomatic patients with M.genitalium to azithromycin. This widespread practice may be selecting for azithromycin-resistance in M.genitalium. With studies now indicating a failure rate of at least 16%, follow-up of M.genitalium-infected patients prescribed azithromycin is not only becoming important, but further research is clearly needed to determine optimal first and second-line therapeutic agents for M.genitalium. This includes more rigorous evaluation of extended-azithromycin therapy, and moxifloxacin. The lack of access to a commercial assay for M.genitalium clearly poses a huge barrier for most clinical services in not only testing for this infection, but in assessing treatment efficacy and in monitoring the development of antibiotic resistance more broadly.
We would like to acknowledge Carol Hopkins for her assistance with following up a significant number of these patients with persistent infection and for training other nursing staff in the follow up procedure, and Associate Professor Sepehr Tabrizi, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne for the development of the PCR assay used to test clinical specimens and to his laboratory staff for performing the testing.
Conceived and designed the experiments: CSB MYC CKF. Performed the experiments: CSB. Analyzed the data: CSB MYC CKF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CSB. Wrote the paper: CSB MYC CKF.
- 1. Jensen JS (2004) Mycoplasma genitalium: the aetiological agent of urethritis and other sexually transmitted diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 18: 1–11.
- 2. Cohen CR, Mugo NR, Astete SG, Odondo R, Manhart LE, et al. (2005) Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in women with laparoscopically diagnosed acute salpingitis. Sex Transm Infect 81: 463–466.
- 3. Clausen HF, Fedder J, Drasbek M, Nielsen PK, Toft B, et al. (2001) Serological investigation of Mycoplasma genitalium in infertile women. Hum Reprod 16: 1866–1874.
- 4. Haggerty CL (2008) Evidence for a role of Mycoplasma genitalium in pelvic inflammatory disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis 21: 65–69.
- 5. Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Astete SG, Ness RB (2006) Mycoplasma genitalium among women with nongonococcal, nonchlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2006: 30184.
- 6. Svenstrup HF, Fedder J, Kristoffersen SE, Trolle B, Birkelund S, et al. (2007) Mycoplasma genitalium, Chlamydia trachomatis, and tubal factor infertility-a prospective study. Fertil Steril.
- 7. Hannan PC (1998) Comparative susceptibilities of various AIDS-associated and human urogenital tract mycoplasmas and strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to 10 classes of antimicrobial agent in vitro. J Med Microbiol 47: 1115–1122.
- 8. Yasuda M, Maeda S, Deguchi T (2005) In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones against Mycoplasma genitalium and their bacteriological efficacy for treatment of M. genitalium-positive nongonococcal urethritis in men. Clin Infect Dis 41: 1357–1359.
- 9. Falk L, Fredlund H, Jensen JS (2003) Tetracycline treatment does not eradicate Mycoplasma genitalium. Sex Transm Infect 79: 318–319.
- 10. Johannisson G, Enstrom Y, Lowhagen GB, Nagy V, Ryberg K, et al. (2000) Occurrence and treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium in patients visiting STD clinics in Sweden. Int J STD AIDS 11: 324–326.
- 11. Maeda SI, Tamaki M, Kojima K, Yoshida T, Ishiko H, et al. (2001) Association of Mycoplasma genitalium persistence in the urethra with recurrence of nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis 28: 472–476.
- 12. Bjornelius E, Anagrius C, Bojs G, Carlberg H, Johannisson G, et al. (2008) Antibiotic treatment of symptomatic Mycoplasma genitalium infection in Scandinavia: a controlled clinical trial. Sex Transm Infect 84: 72–76.
- 13. Mroczkowski TF, Mena LA, Nsumai M, Martin DH (2005) A randomized comparison of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium positive urethritis in men. Amsterdam: pp. 304–305.
- 14. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (2006) Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2006. MMWR 55: 1–93.
- 15. Bradshaw CS, Jensen JS, Tabrizi SN, Read TR, Garland SM, et al. (2006) Azithromycin failure in Mycoplasma genitalium urethritis. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 1149–1152.
- 16. Yoshida T, Deguchi T, Ito M, Maeda S, Tamaki M, et al. (2002) Quantitative detection of Mycoplasma genitalium from first-pass urine of men with urethritis and asymptomatic men by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 40: 1451–1455.
- 17. Gaydos CA, Crochtfeld KA, Howell MR, Kralian S, Hauptman P, et al. (1998) Molecular amplification assays to detect chlamydia infections in urine specimens from high school female students and to monitor the persistence of chlamydial DA after therapy. J Infect Dis 177: 417–424.
- 18. Hjorth SV, Bjornelius E, Lidbrink P, Falk L, Dohn B, et al. (2006) Sequence-based typing of Mycoplasma genitalium reveals sexual transmission. J Clin Microbiol 44: 2078–2083.
- 19. Iverson Cabral SL, Astete SG, Cohen CR, Totten PA (2005) Heterogeneity of the MGPB gene in Mycoplasma genitalium, a mechanism for persistence72.
- 20. Iverson-Cabral SL, Astete SG, Cohen CR, Rocha EP, Totten PA (2006) Intrastrain heterogeneity of the mgpB gene in Mycoplasma genitalium is extensive in vitro and in vivo and suggests that variation is generated via recombination with repetitive chromosomal sequences. Infect Immun 74: 3715–3726.
- 21. Ma L, Jensen JS, Myers L, Burnett J, Welch M, et al. (2007) Mycoplasma genitalium: an efficient strategy to generate genetic variation from a minimal genome. Mol Microbiol 66: 220–236.
- 22. Hamasuna R, Osada Y, Jensen JS (2005) Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Mycoplasma genitalium by TaqMan 5′ nuclease real-time PCR. Antimicobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49: 4993–4998.