16 Sep 2008: Levavasseur E, Laffont-Proust I, Morain É, Faucheux BA, Privat N, et al. (2008) Correction: Regulating Factors of PrPres Glycosylation in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease - Implications for the Dissemination and the Diagnosis of Human Prion Strains. PLOS ONE 3(9): 10.1371/annotation/4d3f48de-5ff4-4442-a041-0e9c78c2049d. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/4d3f48de-5ff4-4442-a041-0e9c78c2049d View correction
The glycoprofile of pathological prion protein (PrPres) is widely used as a diagnosis marker in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and is thought to vary in a strain-specific manner. However, that the same glycoprofile of PrPres always accumulates in the whole brain of one individual has been questioned. We aimed to determine whether and how PrPres glycosylation is regulated in the brain of patients with sporadic and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
PrPres glycoprofiles in four brain regions from 134 patients with sporadic or variant CJD were analyzed as a function of the genotype at codon 129 of PRNP and the Western blot type of PrPres.
The regional distribution of PrPres glycoforms within one individual was heterogeneous in sporadic but not in variant CJD. PrPres glycoforms ratio significantly correlated with the genotype at codon 129 of the prion protein gene and the Western blot type of PrPres in a region-specific manner. In some cases of sCJD, the glycoprofile of thalamic PrPres was undistinguishable from that observed in variant CJD.
Regulations leading to variations of PrPres pattern between brain regions in sCJD patients, involving host genotype and Western blot type of PrPres may contribute to the specific brain targeting of prion strains and have direct implications for the diagnosis of the different forms of CJD.
Citation: Levavasseur E, Laffont-Proust I, Morain É, Faucheux BA, Privat N, Peoc'h K, et al. (2008) Regulating Factors of PrPres Glycosylation in Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease - Implications for the Dissemination and the Diagnosis of Human Prion Strains. PLoS ONE 3(7): e2786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002786
Editor: Adriano Aguzzi, Institute of Neuropathology, Switzerland
Received: June 13, 2008; Accepted: July 1, 2008; Published: July 30, 2008
Copyright: © 2008 Levavasseur et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from Région Ile-de-France and INVS. B.A.F. acknowledges funding from the Assistance Publique-HÃ'pitaux de Paris (Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et au Développement).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases. They are clinically characterized by progressive dementia associated with various neurological symptoms and neuropathologically by spongiosis, gliosis and neuronal loss in the brain. An almost constant biochemical hallmark is the accumulation of an abnormal partially protease-resistant isoform (PrPres) of the host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrPc). According to the protein only hypothesis, the mechanism for prion propagation is thought to involve the conversion of PrPc into PrPres , . In humans, prion disorders occur in acquired, inherited and sporadic forms. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) accounts for more than 80 percent of the cases . Among sCJD patients, a wide range of clinical and neuropathological phenotypes is observed. Recently, efforts have focused on the molecular basis of such phenotypical diversity considering the biochemical properties of PrPres and the presence of polymorphisms within the gene encoding PrP (PRNP). Indeed, a classification of PrPres Western blot patterns, obtained after proteinase K (PK) digestion which leads to PK-resistant core fragments of either 21 kDa (type 1) or 19 kDa (type 2), has been proposed . This difference results from distinct PK cleavage sites of PrPres . Another contribution to the sCJD heterogeneity is the methionine/ valine polymorphism at the codon 129 of PRNP . By correlating codon 129 genotypes and PrPres types to clinical and pathological features in a series of 300 sporadic CJD, six molecular combinations corresponding to some phenotypic variants were identified . However, these observations are based on the postulate that the same PrP conformer accumulates in the whole brain . This has been recently questioned since more than one PrPres type in the brain from sCJD patients has been observed . Human prion protein has two sites of N-glycosylation at residues 181 and 197 . Depending on the occupation of these sites, different glycoforms are identified on Western blot, the proportion of which may vary between prion strains. For example, a higher amount of diglycosylated PrPres (type 2B) distinguishes vCJD from sCJD patients . This particular pattern is retained when the type 2B prion strain is transmitted from one species to another. This contributed to the identification of the BSE as the origin of vCJD epidemics in humans, suggesting that protein glycosylation may be part of specific strain properties . Glycosylation seems also to be involved in the targeting of brain regions by prions leading to strain-specific lesion profiles as previously suggested in a study using transgenic mice overexpressing hamster PrP mutated at the 2nd glycosylation site . Other results recently obtained using gene-targeted mice showed also that N-linked glycosylation of the prion protein influences lesion profile and plaque occurrence induced by some experimental strains of scrapie . While PrPres glycosylation is a key factor in strain diagnosis and probably brain targeting in human diseases, whether it is regulated between brain regions, and how, remains largely unknown.
Hence, we analyzed the pattern of PrPres glycosylation from four different brain regions in a large series of 134 patients with CJD and investigated how brain region, PRNP genotype at codon 129 and PrPres type may affect the accumulation of PrPres glycotypes.
Classification of CJD cases
Using results from Western blot typing of PrPres and PRNP genotyping, we obtained a distribution of the different molecular subtypes of sCJD cases with a predominance of MM1 and VV2 patients (Fig 1 and Table 1), consistent with the distribution reported by Head et al. in a UK population . All the patients with vCJD were methionine homozygotes and had type 2B PrPres.
Type of PrPres in frontal cortex (F), occipital cortex (O), thalamus (T) and cerebellum (C) was determined using type 1, type 2A and type 2B standards after PK digestion.
Regional variations of PrPres glycoform ratio in sCJD patients
Frontal cortex versus occipital cortex.
No difference was observed between these two regions as illustrated on Fig 2A, left panel. The three glycoforms were evenly distributed in both regions. The proportion of di- and nonglycosylated forms in the frontal cortex correlated well with those observed in the occipital cortex (regression analysis: r = 0,58) (Fig 2A, right panel).
PrPres glycoform ratios from the frontal and occipital cortex were not statistically different (A, left panel). Each dot represents one brain area from a patient and is defined on the ternary plot by three coordinates corresponding to the relative intensity of di-, mono- and nonglycosylated bands. The correlation between diglycosylated forms from these two regions is shown on the regression curve (A, right panel). The thalamus exhibited more diglycosylated forms and less nonglycosylated forms than the occipital cortex (B). The cerebellum exhibited more monoglycosylated forms than the cortical regions (C). More diglycosylated forms were also detected in the thalamus when compared with the cerebellum, which showed more monoglycosylated forms (D).
Frontal or occipital cortex versus thalamus.
PrPres glycoform ratios from the frontal cortex and the thalamus were not statistically different. However, they differed significantly between the occipital cortex and the thalamus, which showed more diglycosylated forms than the occipital cortex (Fig 2B).
Frontal or occipital cortex versus cerebellum.
Compared to the frontal and the occipital isocortices, a higher proportion of monoglycosylated forms was found in the cerebellum (Fig 2C). Frontal cortex exhibited more diglycosylated and nonglycosylated forms than the cerebellum.
Cerebellum versus thalamus.
Higher amounts of diglycosylated forms were detected in the thalamus while an increased accumulation of monoglycosylated forms occurred in the cerebellum (Fig 2D).
Regional variations of PrPres glycoform ratio in vCJD patients
In the 11 French vCJD patients that we studied, we consistently observed the typical type 2B PrPres profile whithout any significant difference between brain regions.
Influence of the PrP genotype at codon 129 on PrPres glycoform ratio
A significant increase of monoglycosylated forms was observed in the frontal cortex (Fig 3A, 3B), occipital cortex (Fig S1A, S1B), thalamus (Fig S2A, S2B) and cerebellum (Fig S3A, S3B), compared to MV and VV genotypes.
Each dot represents one brain area from a patient and is defined on the ternary plot by three coordinates corresponding to the relative intensity of di-, mono- and nonglycosylated bands. More monoglycosylated forms were detected in methionine homozygote patients compared to other genotypes (A, B). Methionine/ valine heterozygote patients showed more nonglycosylated forms (A, C). Valine homozygote patients had more diglycosylated forms (B, C).
Frontal cortex (Fig 3A, 3C), occipital cortex (Fig S1A, S1C), thalamus (Fig S2A, S2C) and cerebellum (Fig S3A, S3C) from MV cases accumulated significantly more nonglycosylated forms than MM and VV cases.
Therefore, a tendency was observed for each genotype to favour the accumulation of one glycoform in the frontal cortex, the occipital cortex, the thalamus and, to a lesser extent, in the cerebellum. Valine homozygosity favoured the diglycosylated form, methionine homozygosity favoured the monoglycosylated form, and heterozygosity favoured the nonglycosylated form.
Influence of the PrPres type on glycoform diversity
We found that the type of PrPres affected the pattern of PrPres glycosylation in the thalamus, while little or no effect was detected in the other studied brain regions. Two distinct populations corresponding to MV1 and MV2 subgroups were evidenced. Subgroup MV2 had more diglycosylated forms and subgroup MV1 presented more nonglycosylated forms (Fig 4).
Each dot represents one brain area from a patient and is defined on the ternary plot by three coordinates corresponding to the relative intensity of di-, mono- and nonglycosylated bands. To rule out any codon effect, the influence of PrPres type was assessed in MV1 and MV2 patients. These two populations are almost separated on the ternary plot. A higher content of diglycosylated forms is observed in the heterozygote MV2 subgroup compared to the MV1 subgroup.
In addition, the homogeneity of PrPres glycoform pattern between regions dramatically varies depending on PrPres types. Indeed, regression analysis demonstrated r values equal to or above 0,80 in MV1 group (Fig 5A, 5C, 5E) when correlating diglycosylated form ratio between regions, while r values from MV2 group ranged from 0,43 to 0,52 (Fig 5B, 5D, 5F). These lower correlations indicate a greater heterogeneity between glycoform ratio from different brain regions.
A strong correlation is observed between diglycoforms of type 1 PrPres from different brain regions (r values equal to or above 0.80) (A, C, E). On the contrary, the glycoform ratio varies to a larger extent when patient had type 2 PrPres (r values equal to or below 0.52) (B, D, F).
This study provides new insight into the analysis of PrPres heterogeneity within sCJD cases, based upon the biochemical analysis of at least 3 different brain regions from 123 sCJD cases. This large series of sCJD tissues allowed us to identify the diversity of PrPres glycoforms within sporadic CJD forms and to establish a correlation with PRNP genotype, brain region and Western blot type of PrPres. Our results demonstrate that the regional distribution of PrPres glycoforms within one individual is heterogeneous in the sporadic form of CJD and suggest the involvement of precise regulating mechanisms.
Different factors may contribute to this regulation. In the normal brain of human, hamster and mouse, PrPc glycosylation pattern is submitted to a regional diversity , , . In infected human brains, the diversity of PrPres glycoprofiles may result from such a regional variation of the substrate for prion replication. According to the prion hypothesis, this mechanism suggests that the glycoprofile of PrPc influences the glycoform ratio of PrPres in the conversion process. In acellular models of PrP conversion indeed, the use of PrPc with modified glycoforms ratio partially modifies the glycosylation pattern of newly formed PrPres . In the present study, we observed that the genotype at codon 129 of PRNP influenced the glycoform ratio of PrPres in a region dependent manner. This raises the possibility that the regional glycosylation state of PrPc may be affected by PRNP polymorphisms. It may be of interest to document such a regulation in the normal human brain.
Several studies have pointed out a relation between PrP amino acid sequence (i.e. PRNP genotype) and PrPres glycosylation in inherited diseases associated to mutation located close to (D178N, V180I, T183A, E200K) or remote (P102L) from the N-glycosylation sites , . Whether the presence of a mutation may modify the glycoform ratio of PrPc in the human brain is poorly documented. However we previously showed that in patients with the V180I mutation, no diglycosylated PrPres is produced, while PrPc glycosylation is normally processed . This clearly indicates that additional factors, different from the glycosylation state of PrPc, may influence the glycoform ratio of the accumulated PrPres in the pathological condition.
Type 1 or type 2 PrPres are thought to correspond to distinct accessibilities of proteinase K to cleavage sites resulting from different conformations of PrPres. A diversity of glycotypes has been described for type 2 PrPres, linked to the various forms of the diseases (sporadic, variant CJD, familial fatal insomnia). In sporadic CJD patients with the same genotype at codon 129, we found that PrPres type markedly influences the glycoform ratio of the accumulated PrPres in definite brain regions. This suggests that some conformers are more prone to convert distinct glycoforms of PrPc in sporadic diseases and that this phenomenon is regionally regulated. In addition, to explain the strain mutation phenomenon, it has been recently proposed that a single strain may consist of an ensemble of molecular species containing a dominant PrPres type . Such conformers may differ by the glycoform species they favor during replication. It can be speculated that regional factors influence the selection of PrPres subpopulations leading to the variation of the glycoform ratio that we finally detected.
The regional variation of PrPres glycoform ratio demonstrated in this study may be of interest in the understanding of “lesion profile” and brain targeting by different prion strains. The mechanisms that favor the accumulation of a given strain in a given brain region are not known, but the regulation of PrPc/ PrPres glycosylation is likely involved in this process , , . As a matter of fact, we found in sCJD cases that the thalamus favored the production of type 2 PrPres presenting a high content in diglycosylated forms. It is noteworthy that besides sCJD, vCJD and FFI are associated with a high content of diglycosylated forms and are characterized by a “targeting” of the thalamus. In all studied brain areas from French vCJD patients, as already reported in the U.K. cases, we observed that the glycoform ratio was remarkably constant. In this infectious form of prion disorders, the pathogenic events are initiated by an exogenous PrPres from contaminated bovine tissues with its own defined characteristics, such as a high glysosylated content that is maintained through interspecies transmission. By contrast, the causative event in sCJD is thought to be a rare, spontaneous and endogenous conversion of the host-encoded PrPc into PrPres. The diversity of glycoform ratios that we observed in sCJD may reflect the regulation of an endogenous phenomenon by various host factors (genotype, brain region) that may be overwhelmed in the case of an infection by a virulent prion strain such as the bovine agent in vCJD patients.
Our observation of PrPres glycoprofile diversity in sCJD raises the question of the strain diagnosis based on biochemical PrPres analysis. The type 2B PrPres profile is widely used as a diagnosis marker of definite vCJD that until now has been observed in MM patients only. However, in some VV2 CJD patients, the high proportion of diglycosylated PrPres we observed in the thalamus was undistinguishable from the PrPres profile detected in vCJD cases. Studies using transgenic mice expressing human PrP suggest that clinicopathological and biochemical presentations of BSE infection may vary in humans with the genotype at codon 129 . One possible explanation of our findings in these particular VV2 cases could be BSE infection (i.e. vCJD) in valine homozygote patients. However, the mean age at death (>65 years, except one case who was 27) and the neuropathological pattern (absence of florid plaques) do not support such hypothesis. While the first MM vCJD patients occurred simultaneously in UK and France, the peak of French vCJD epidemics occurred in 2002 more than 5 years later than in the UK. Comparison of the 1980–1995 pattern of BSE exposition in the UK and France indicated that it peaked also later in France . This probably explains the different temporal pattern of vCJD incidence. We analyzed retrospectively whether some French VV2 CJD patients who died between 1993 and 1999 exhibited also a thalamic PrPres profile with high glycosylation site occupancy similar to what is observed in vCJD. The same profile of PrPres ressembling type 2B could also be detected in patients who died during the 1993–1999 period (Fig 6). This suggests that these VV patients had indeed a genuine sporadic disease rather than an atypical vCJD, which is very unlikely to have occurred in an unrelated genotype and before 1996 in France.
Each dot represents one brain area from a patient and is defined on the ternary plot by three coordinates corresponding to the relative intensity of di-, mono- and nonglycosylated bands. We compared the VV2 patients from our sCJD series and vCJD patients with VV2 sCJD patients who died before or just after the first variant breakout in 1996. No difference was observed between VV2 patients from the 2000–2007 series and VV2 patients from the period 1993–1999.
Finally, the present work evidences regulations that lead to highly significant variations of PrPres pattern between brain regions in sCJD patients, involving host genotype and Western blot type of PrPres as recapitulated in figure 7. These may contribute to the specific brain targeting of prion strains and have some diagnosis implications.
Case and tissue selection
This study was performed on patients referred to the French National Surveillance Network for CJD during the period january 2000 to march 2007 and for which clinical, genetic and neuropathological data were available to support a diagnosis of definite sCJD . Only patients with at least three available regions out of the four studied (frontal cortex, occipital cortex, thalamus and cerebellar vermis) were considered. Patients with familial and iatrogenic CJD were excluded from the study. We included 123 sCJD cases (103 patients had 4 available regions), 55 male and 68 female subjects, and the mean age at death was 68 (range, 24–90 years). In addition, a group of 11 french vCJD cases was also studied, comprising of 4 male and 7 female subjects. The mean age at death was 36 (range, 20–58 years). The patients' relatives gave written informed consent for autopsy, and the study was designed in accordance with the relevant French legislation.
DNA was extracted from buffy coat fraction of peripheral blood after obtaining written informed consent from patients. Codon 129 polymorphism of the PRNP gene and the absence of mutation or insertion was determined as described elsewhere .
Biochemical analysis of PrPres
Frozen tissue was stored at −80°C. Brains were homogenized at 20% (w/v) using a Ribolyser (Bio-Rad) in 5% sterile glucose. One volume of a 20% NaCl solution and one volume of a detergent solution (20% sarkosyl, 2% SB3-14 and Tris 20 mM pH 7.4) were added to one volume of 20% brain homogenate. This mixture had a final pH of 7.6 and was digested with proteinase K at 10 µg/ml (diluted in Tris-HCl 50 mM pH 8, CaCl2 1 mM) for 1 h at 37°C. PrPres was then purified by centrifugation at 27500 g for 2 h at room temperature on 20% sucrose cushion, according to the scrapie-associated fibril (SAF) protocol reported previously with slight modifications . Samples were subjected to a 12% Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. PrP staining was performed using anti-PrP monoclonal antibody 3F4, epitope 109–112 of human PrP sequence (Signet, MA, USA) at a dilution of 1 to 50000, and chemiluminescence (ECL; RPN-2209; Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) for the detection of peroxidase activity . Goat anti-mouse secondary antibody horseradish peroxidase conjugated used was from Pierce Biotechnology (31430, Rockford, IL) and used at a dilution of 1 to 5000. Quantitation of PrPres glycoforms was performed using a GS-800 calibrated densitometer and dedicated Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) as described . Values for all PrPres bands were measured on blots with a non-saturated signal and calculated as a percentage of the total PrPres. When necessary, additional blots were performed with serially diluted samples to obtain a signal in a linear range. Type 1 PrPres and type 2 PrPres were characterized by a nonglycosylated band migrating at 21 kDa and at 19 kDa, respectively, as described by Parchi et al. . Typical standards of type 1, type 2A and type 2B PrPres were systematically included to facilitate Western blot typing of PrPres. Molecular weights were determined using a protein standard (Novex Sharp Standard, Invitrogen). Cases of sCJD were classified according to Parchi et al. that identified six molecular subtypes on the basis of the PRNP codon 129 polymorphism and PrPres type . Cases of sCJD for which both types of PrPres were detected using 3F4 antibody in a same brain region or in different regions were excluded from the study , , .
Linear regression, correlation and non parametric tests were carried out using StatView v4.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Glycoform ratios were visualized on ternary plot as originally described by Glatzel et al. . Automated graphical representations were generated using JMP software v6.0.0 (SAS).
Influence of PRNP codon 129 genotype on PrPres glycoform ratios in the occipital cortex from sCJD patients. This brain region was less affected by genotype than the frontal cortex and the thalamus. However, methionine homozygote patients showed more monoglycosylated forms (A, B) and methionine/ valine heterozygote patients were associated with a predominance of nonglycosylated forms (A, C).
(3.75 MB TIF)
Influence of PRNP codon 129 genotype on PrPres glycoform ratios in the thalamus from sCJD patients. Marked differences were observed in this brain region. More monoglycosylated forms were detected in methionine homozygote patients compared to other genotypes (A, B,). Methionine/ valine heterozygote patients presented more nonglycosylated forms (A, C). Valine homozygote patients had more diglycosylated forms (B, C).
(3.81 MB TIF)
Influence of PRNP codon 129 genotype on PrPres glycoform ratios in the cerebellum from sCJD patients. Like the occipital cortex, this brain region was less affected by genotype than the frontal cortex and the thalamus. However, methionine homozygote patients remained associated with more monoglycosylated forms (A, B), methionine/ valine heterozygote patients were associated with a predominance of nonglycosylated forms (A, C), while valine homozygote patients clearly presented more diglycosylated forms (B, C).
(3.81 MB TIF)
Conceived and designed the experiments: EL ILP SH. Performed the experiments: EL ILP M KP. Analyzed the data: EL ILP BF JJH SH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NP KP VS JPB JJH SH. Wrote the paper: EL ILP BF KP JPB JJH SH.
- 1. Bolton DC, McKinley MP, Prusiner SB (1982) Identification of a protein that purifies with the scrapie prion. Science 218: 1309–1311.
- 2. Prusiner SB (1998) Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 13363–13383.
- 3. Pocchiari M, Puopolo M, Croes EA, Budka H, Gelpi E, et al. (2004) Predictors of survival in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Brain 127: 2348–2359.
- 4. Monari L, Chen SG, Brown P, Parchi P, Petersen RB, et al. (1994) Fatal familial insomnia and familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: different prion proteins determined by a DNA polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 2839–2842.
- 5. Parchi P, Zou W, Wang W, Brown P, Capellari S, et al. (2000) Genetic influence on the structural variations of the abnormal prion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 10168–10172.
- 6. Parchi P, Castellani R, Capellari S, Ghetti B, Young K, et al. (1996) Molecular basis of phenotypic variability in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 39: 767–778.
- 7. Parchi P, Giese A, Capellari S, Brown P, Schulz-Schaeffer W, et al. (1999) Classification of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease based on molecular and phenotypic analysis of 300 subjects. Ann Neurol 46: 224–233.
- 8. Head MW, Bunn TJ, Bishop MT, McLoughlin V, Lowrie S, et al. (2004) Prion protein heterogeneity in sporadic but not variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: UK cases 1991–2002. Ann Neurol 55: 851–859.
- 9. Puoti G, Giaccone G, Rossi G, Canciani B, Bugiani O, et al. (1999) Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: co-occurrence of different types of PrP(Sc) in the same brain. Neurology 53: 2173–2176.
- 10. Endo T, Groth D, Prusiner SB, Kobata A (1989) Diversity of oligosaccharide structures linked to asparagines of the scrapie prion protein. Biochemistry 28: 8380–8388.
- 11. Collinge J, Sidle KC, Meads J, Ironside J, Hill AF (1996) Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of ‘new variant’ CJD. Nature 383: 685–690.
- 12. DeArmond SJ, Sanchez H, Yehiely F, Qiu Y, Ninchak-Casey A, et al. (1997) Selective neuronal targeting in prion disease. Neuron 19: 1337–1348.
- 13. Tuzi NL, Cancellotti E, Baybutt H, Blackford L, Bradford B, et al. (2008) Host PrP glycosylation: a major factor determining the outcome of prion infection. PLoS Biol 6: e100.
- 14. Beringue V, Mallinson G, Kaisar M, Tayebi M, Sattar Z, et al. (2003) Regional heterogeneity of cellular prion protein isoforms in the mouse brain. Brain 126: 2065–2073.
- 15. DeArmond SJ, Qiu Y, Sanchez H, Spilman PR, Ninchak-Casey A, et al. (1999) PrPc glycoform heterogeneity as a function of brain region: implications for selective targeting of neurons by prion strains. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 58: 1000–1009.
- 16. Kuczius T, Koch R, Keyvani K, Karch H, Grassi J, et al. (2007) Regional and phenotype heterogeneity of cellular prion proteins in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 25: 2649–2655.
- 17. Vorberg I, Priola SA (2002) Molecular basis of scrapie strain glycoform variation. J Biol Chem 277: 36775–36781.
- 18. Grasbon-Frodl E, Lorenz H, Mann U, Nitsch RM, Windl O, et al. (2004) Loss of glycosylation associated with the T183A mutation in human prion disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 108: 476–484.
- 19. Hill AF, Joiner S, Beck JA, Campbell TA, Dickinson A, et al. (2006) Distinct glycoform ratios of protease resistant prion protein associated with PRNP point mutations. Brain 129: 676–685.
- 20. Chasseigneaux S, Haik S, Laffont-Proust I, De Marco O, Lenne M, et al. (2006) V180I mutation of the prion protein gene associated with atypical PrPSc glycosylation. Neurosci Lett 408: 165–169.
- 21. Collinge J, Clarke AR (2007) A general model of prion strains and their pathogenicity. Science 318: 930–936.
- 22. Somerville RA (1999) Host and transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agent strain control glycosylation of PrP. J Gen Virol 80 (Pt 7): 1865–1872.
- 23. Asante EA, Linehan JM, Gowland I, Joiner S, Fox K, et al. (2006) Dissociation of pathological and molecular phenotype of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in transgenic human prion protein 129 heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10759–10764.
- 24. Chadeau-Hyam M, Tard A, Bird S, Le Guennec S, Bemrah N, et al. (2003) Estimation of the exposure of the French population to the BSE agent: comparison of the 1980–95 consumption of beef products containing mechanically recovered meat in France and the UK, by birth cohort and gender. Stat Methods Med Res 12: 247–260.
- 25. Budka H, Aguzzi A, Brown P, Brucher JM, Bugiani O, et al. (1995) Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and other human spongiform encephalopathies (prion diseases). Brain Pathol 5: 459–466.
- 26. Peoc'h K, Manivet P, Beaudry P, Attane F, Besson G, et al. (2000) Identification of three novel mutations (E196K, V203I, E211Q) in the prion protein gene (PRNP) in inherited prion diseases with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease phenotype. Hum Mutat 15: 482.
- 27. Lasmezas CI, Deslys JP, Robain O, Jaegly A, Beringue V, et al. (1997) Transmission of the BSE agent to mice in the absence of detectable abnormal prion protein. Science 275: 402–405.
- 28. Kascsak RJ, Rubenstein R, Merz PA, Tonna-DeMasi M, Fersko R, et al. (1987) Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins. J Virol 61: 3688–3693.
- 29. Polymenidou M, Stoeck K, Glatzel M, Vey M, Bellon A, et al. (2005) Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet Neurol 4: 805–814.
- 30. Glatzel M, Abela E, Maissen M, Aguzzi A (2003) Extraneural pathologic prion protein in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N Engl J Med 349: 1812–1820.