Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Brucellosis Vaccines: Assessment of Brucella melitensis Lipopolysaccharide Rough Mutants Defective in Core and O-Polysaccharide Synthesis and Export

  • David González,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • María-Jesús Grilló,

    Affiliation Instituto de Agrobiotecnología, CSIC-UPNA-Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • María-Jesús De Miguel,

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria (CITA), Sanidad Animal, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain

  • Tara Ali,

    Affiliation Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Vilma Arce-Gorvel,

    Affiliations Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Sciences de Luminy, Marseille, France, INSERM, U631, Marseille, France, CNRS, UMR6102, Marseille, France

  • Rose-May Delrue,

    Affiliation Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Microbiologie - Unité de Recherche en Biologie Moléculaire (URBM), Facultés Universitaires - Notre-Dame de la Paix (FUNDP), Namur, Belgium

  • Raquel Conde-Álvarez,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Pilar Muñoz,

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria (CITA), Sanidad Animal, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain

  • Ignacio López-Goñi,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Maite Iriarte,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Clara-M. Marín,

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria (CITA), Sanidad Animal, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain

  • Andrej Weintraub,

    Affiliation Karolinska Institute, Department Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Bacteriology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Göran Widmalm,

    Affiliation Arrhenius Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Michel Zygmunt,

    Affiliation INRA, UR1282, Infectiologie Animale et Santé Publique, IASP, Nouzilly, France

  • Jean-Jacques Letesson,

    Affiliation Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Microbiologie - Unité de Recherche en Biologie Moléculaire (URBM), Facultés Universitaires - Notre-Dame de la Paix (FUNDP), Namur, Belgium

  • Jean-Pierre Gorvel,

    Affiliations Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Sciences de Luminy, Marseille, France, INSERM, U631, Marseille, France, CNRS, UMR6102, Marseille, France

  • José-María Blasco,

    Affiliation Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria (CITA), Sanidad Animal, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain

  •  [ ... ],
  • Ignacio Moriyón

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Brucellosis Vaccines: Assessment of Brucella melitensis Lipopolysaccharide Rough Mutants Defective in Core and O-Polysaccharide Synthesis and Export

  • David González, 
  • María-Jesús Grilló, 
  • María-Jesús De Miguel, 
  • Tara Ali, 
  • Vilma Arce-Gorvel, 
  • Rose-May Delrue, 
  • Raquel Conde-Álvarez, 
  • Pilar Muñoz, 
  • Ignacio López-Goñi, 
  • Maite Iriarte



The brucellae are facultative intracellular bacteria that cause brucellosis, one of the major neglected zoonoses. In endemic areas, vaccination is the only effective way to control this disease. Brucella melitensis Rev 1 is a vaccine effective against the brucellosis of sheep and goat caused by B. melitensis, the commonest source of human infection. However, Rev 1 carries a smooth lipopolysaccharide with an O-polysaccharide that elicits antibodies interfering in serodiagnosis, a major problem in eradication campaigns. Because of this, rough Brucella mutants lacking the O-polysaccharide have been proposed as vaccines.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To examine the possibilities of rough vaccines, we screened B. melitensis for lipopolysaccharide genes and obtained mutants representing all main rough phenotypes with regard to core oligosaccharide and O-polysaccharide synthesis and export. Using the mouse model, mutants were classified into four attenuation patterns according to their multiplication and persistence in spleens at different doses. In macrophages, mutants belonging to three of these attenuation patterns reached the Brucella characteristic intracellular niche and multiplied intracellularly, suggesting that they could be suitable vaccine candidates. Virulence patterns, intracellular behavior and lipopolysaccharide defects roughly correlated with the degree of protection afforded by the mutants upon intraperitoneal vaccination of mice. However, when vaccination was applied by the subcutaneous route, only two mutants matched the protection obtained with Rev 1 albeit at doses one thousand fold higher than this reference vaccine. These mutants, which were blocked in O-polysaccharide export and accumulated internal O-polysaccharides, stimulated weak anti-smooth lipopolysaccharide antibodies.


The results demonstrate that no rough mutant is equal to Rev 1 in laboratory models and question the notion that rough vaccines are suitable for the control of brucellosis in endemic areas.


Brucellosis is a group of closely related zoonotic bacterial diseases caused by the members of the genus Brucella, a group of gram-negative bacteria that behave as facultative intracellular parasites. There are several Brucella species, and they infect a wide range of mammals in which they are a main cause of abortions and infertility. In addition, they are readily transmitted to human beings where they produce a grave and debilitating disease that requires a long and costly antibiotic therapy and that often leaves permanent sequelae [1]. Because of its high incidence in developing countries, economic consequences, and difficult eradication, the World Health Organization considers brucellosis as one of the seven neglected zoonoses, a group of diseases that contribute to the perpetuation of poverty [2].

Ruminants are highly susceptible to brucellosis. Cattle are most often infected by B. abortus whereas sheep and goats are the preferred hosts of B. melitensis, the Brucella species most virulent for humans [3]. Although there is no human vaccine, vaccination of animals against brucellosis is one of the most cost-effective measures to improve human health in endemic areas [4] as well as an essential tool to achieve eradication [5], [6]. For these purposes, vaccines B. abortus S19 and B. melitensis Rev 1 have been successfully used in some developed countries, but both induce abortions when applied during pregnancy, are virulent for humans and elicit antibodies to the smooth (S) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of the Brucella surface that interfere in serodiagnosis. Moreover, Rev 1 is resistant to streptomycin, an antibiotic used to treat the disease. Although the serodiagnosis problem can be partially solved by using the conjunctival route, by avoiding adult vaccination, and by an individual serological follow up, the breeding conditions characteristic of small ruminants make these measures unrealistic in large areas of the world. Therefore, effective brucellosis vaccines not interfering in diagnosis would represent a major breakthrough [7], [8].

Rough (R) Brucella mutants lack the LPS immunodominant N-formylperosamine O-polysaccharide (O-PS) and are attenuated. Thus, they have been the subject of great attention as alternative vaccines [7], [8]. Some R vaccines or candidates are spontaneous mutants selected after repeated passage on antibiotic-containing media. This approach was used to obtain RB51, a B. abortus R mutant that carries a IS711-disrupted wboA (putative glycosyltranferase gene) as well as unknown mutations also affecting LPS. However, RB51 has yielded controversial results in cattle, is not effective in sheep and is resistant to rifampin, an antibiotic used to treat brucellosis [8]. B. melitensis RBM9, RBM11, RBM15, RBM17 and RBM19 have been obtained by a similar method and, as expected, they carry undefined LPS defects and are rifampin resistant [9]. Targeted and transposon mutagenesis have also been used. Disruption of per, wboA and wbkA (putative perosamine synthetase and glycosyltranferase genes) results in R mutants that outperform RB51 in the mouse model [10][12], showing that empirically R vaccines can be improved. However, R mutants can result from mutations affecting O-PS precursor synthesis, its polymerization and transport or from a variety of defects in the inner core oligosaccharide. Presently, it is not known which of these mutations results in the best R vaccine or how such a vaccine would compare with S19 or Rev 1. To address these questions, we investigated 14 LPS B. melitensis mutants with respect to LPS defects, intracellular multiplication and virulence and vaccine efficacy in mice. The results provide the basis for selecting the best R candidates for sheep and goat vaccination against B. melitensis, and are also relevant for an appraisal of the value of brucellosis R vaccines.


Mutagenesis, mutant selection and growth characteristics

Perusal of the literature shows that 16M (reference strain of B. melitensis biovar 1 and the one sequenced) does not always show the virulence levels of other S brucellae [12][14]. Because of this, we used this strain and also B. melitensis H38 (fully virulent [15]) to obtain the nalidixic acid resistant (NalR) derivatives necessary for mutagenesis and confirmed that this selection did not affect their characteristics in mice (not shown). Then, we performed transposon mutagenesis and obtained ca. 16,500 kanamycin resistant mutants from which we selected 23 that displayed a stable R phenotype both in vitro and in mice, as judged by the crystal violet test, lack of reactivity with anti O-PS antibodies and phage typing. These mutants mapped in 16 open reading frames (ORFs) scattered into eight regions. Complementation failed to restore the S phenotype in mutants in four of these ORFs. Moreover, mutagenesis of the adjacent ORFs ruled out both possible polarity effects and the involvement in LPS synthesis of some ORFs with suggestive annotations (Table S1). We confirmed the R phenotype of the remaining mutants (Table 1) by examining the LPS by the sodium dodecylsulfate-proteinase K method and, for ORFs BMEI1326, BMEI1414, BMEI1426 and BMEI1427, by making in frame deletion mutants. Finally, since some mutants showed differences in colony size suggestive of altered growth rates, we obtained the corresponding growth curves. Mutants in BMEI1415 (wzm), BMEI1886 (pgm) and BMEI1326 (wa**) were retarded with respect to the parental strain whereas BMEII0899 (manBcore) grew faster (Figure S1).

The mutations block the major LPS polysaccharide synthesis pathways

In order to assign the mutations to the O-PS or the core oligosaccharide biosynthetic pathways, we first classified the mutants as R1, R2 or R3 according to the decrease in LPS molecular weight (Figure 1 and Table 1). Three R1 mutants mapped in per (BMEI1414, Table 1). Since per is involved in the synthesis of perosamine [16], the only Brucella O-PS sugar [17], we took this as evidence for a complete core in R1 and, consequently, for a mutation affecting the O-PS. Likewise, the progressively defective core in R2 and R3 mutants indicated that the corresponding ORF belonged to core synthesis pathways. Consistent with these interpretations, the 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid ([Kdo] inner core marker) content of solvent-extracted R-LPS of BMEI1414 and BMEI1427 (R1), BMEI1326 (R2) and BMEII0899 (R3) mutants was 3.8, 4.0, 6.8 and 9.5%, respectively.

Figure 1. LPS profiles by SDS-PAGE.

SDS-proteinase K extracts of the 16M NalR strain and of mutants representative of the R1 (Bm16MRwboB [lane 1] and Bm16MRper [lane 2]), R2 (Bm16MRpgm [lane 3]) and R3 (BmH38RmanBcore [lane 4]) LPS types were analyzed in gels of the indicated acrylamide % and then periodate-silver stained.

Mutants affected in O-PS synthesis.

Mutants in BMEI0997 and BMEI0998 and in ORFs from BMEI1393 to BMEI1427 were of the R1 type (Table 1 and Figure 2A). The two first ORFs, putatively encoding glycosyltransferases, included the previously described wboA (BMEI0998) [18]. According to their R1 phenotype, these two ORFs are implicated in O-PS synthesis and BMEI0997 was thus named wboB. Likewise, the R1 phenotype of BMEI1393 matched its annotation as a mannosyltransferase gene (mannose and perosamine are related) and its location close to wbkA (BMEI1404), the first ORF of the O-PS wbk region [16] (Figure 2B). Because of this, we named the gene wbkE. The R1 phenotype of mutants in genes wbkA, gmd, per and wzm, all in the wbk region, was also in keeping with the roles proposed in previous works (Table 1 and Figure 2A) [11], [16]. Two other R1 mutants mapped close to wbk (Figure 2B). The first one (BMEI1426), separated by several IS from wbkC (BMEI1418), was identified before as a LPS gene in B. abortus [19] and encodes a 335 amino acid protein with homology to polyisoprenyl-phosphate N-acetylhexosamine-1-phosphate transferases (PNPT). Known PNPTs include Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 WbpL and Escherichia coli WecA, both involved in bactoprenol priming but belonging to two subfamilies that differ in aminosugar specificity [20]. A search for WbpL (339 amino acids) homologues in B. melitensis identified BMEI1426 as the closest one (BLAST E-value = 4e−22). For WecA (367 amino acids), not only BMEI1426 (1e10−8) but also BMEII0839 (1e10−42) were identified. However, the only WecA match in B. abortus genomes was the BMEI1426 ortholog (BruAb1_0533 and BAB1_05359-49 in B. abortus 9-49 and 2308, respectively). This result, which is due to a large deletion in B. abortus chromosome II encompassing the position of the BMEII0839 ortholog [21], supports the role of BMEI1426 as the Brucella PNPT gene. The BMEI1426 protein resembled WecA and WbpL in the Asp rich consensus motif of the catalytic site [20] but did not show the motifs thought to relate to substrate specificity in either subfamily. Since it could not be ascribed to any of these subfamilies, we named this gene wbkF. Finally, we named the adjacent ORF (BMEI1427) wbkD. The protein is annotated as an epimerase/dehydratase and carries a NAD or NADP binding motif, two features of the trifunctional UDP-N- d-acetylglucosamine 4,6- dehydratase/5-epimerase/3-epimerase enzymes that take part in the synthesis of 2-acetamido-2,6-dideoxy-L-hexoses such as N-acetylfucosamine and N-acetylquinovosamine [22]. Quinovosamine (2-amino-2,6-dideoxy-D-glucose) has been reported in the LPS of S Brucella spp. [23][27] but its location is unclear. Since N-acetylquinovosamine synthesis would require an epimerase/dehydratase using NADP as the coenzyme [22], we investigated the S-LPS hydrolytic polysaccharides of B. melitensis and B. abortus. In addition to the N-formylperosamine signals, a resonance at 2.06 ppm. indicated the presence of an N-acetyl group in these materials. The integrals of these signals compared to those from the methyl groups of perosamine at ∼1.3 ppm showed that the former derived from ∼1% of the material. Moreover, the 1H NMR spectrum at 25°C of the B. abortus material (which was highly pure) showed a resonance at 4.56 ppm having JH1,H2 = 7.9 Hz. Further analysis was performed at 70°C (Figure S2) using in particular 2D 1H, 1H- total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY) with spin-lock times up to 120 ms by which a complete spin-system corresponding to a quinovosamine residue was traced out. The following chemical shifts were identified: δ 4.54 (H1), 3.79 (H2), 3.66 (H3), 3.35 (H4), 3.50 (H5), and 1.30 (H6). Thus, the analysis revealed the characteristic 1H NMR chemical shifts of a β-linked quinovosamine, which should be N-acetylated and is presumably 3-substituted [28], [29]. Indeed, this N-acetylquinovosamine could be the substrate of the putative PNPT WbkF, since WbkF is close to WbpL and the latter transfers either N-acetylfucosamine or N-acetylquinovosamine [20]. Moreover, the adjacent position of wbkF and wbkD also suggests a functional connection.

Figure 2. Genetics of B. melitensis S-LPS biosynthesis.

(A), Pathways. Brucella grows with glucose as the only C source and is thus able to derive all S-LPS precursors from this sugar. The steps leading to N-formylperosamine synthesis and to its polymerization by Wbo and Wbk glycosyltransferases are in blue, and those leading to bactroprenol priming for N-formylperosamine polymerization in green. Once this happens, O-PS is translocated to the periplasm by the Wzm/Wzt ABC transporter (also in blue) and ligated to the core oligosaccharide which results from the pathways marked in red. The steps disrupted in this work are indicated by black triangles in which R1, R2, or R3 refer to the LPS phenotypes (the wbkC mutant is described in reference [16]). An empty triangle indicates a mutation that does not generate R phenotype, and a black triangle marked with S a mutation that, while blocking the synthesis of a core lateral branch, does not prevent O-PS linkage to the core (Conde-Álvarez, R., unpublished results). (B), The major (wbk) genetic region of Brucella O-PS synthesis. This region contains genes coding for enzymes necessary for N-formylperosamine synthesis (gmd, per, wbkC), two O-PS glycosyltransferases (wbkE, wbkA), the ABC transporters (wzm, wzt), the PNPT enzyme (wbkD) and at least one enzyme necessary for the synthesis of an N-acetylaminosugar (wbkF), as well as groups of insertion sequences (ISs) that make it unstable. The mutations analyzed in this work are marked with triangles. Mutations in manB and wbkB do not generate R mutants (this work and reference [16]).

Extension of the wbk region up to BMEI1393 (wbkE) (Figure 2B) suggested that BMEI1394, BMEI1395 and BMEI1396 (putative mannose-6-phosphate isomerase [manA], mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase [manC] and phosphomannomutase [manB]) could be involved in the synthesis of mannose, the precursor of perosamine (Figure 2A). However, when we disrupted BMEI1396 (manB), the mutant still expressed O-PS demonstrating that the gene was not essential for mannose synthesis.

Mutants affected in core oligosaccharide synthesis.

Mutant BMEI1326 had a R2 LPS like that observed before in a B. abortus orthologous mutant [11], and encodes a predicted glycosyltransferase of family 25. This is worth mentioning because this family contains LPS glycosyltransferases, including the WaaX protein that takes part in the synthesis of some E. coli core chemotypes [30]. BMEI1326 is isolated from other LPS genes and, in the absence of more information, we maintained its provisional name (wa**) [11]. Mutant in BMEI1886 was affected in a putative phosphoglucomutase (Pgm) and had a R2 LPS (Figure 2), in agreement with a previous observation in B. abortus [31] and with the presence of glucose in the Brucella LPS core [26]. Finally, BMEII0899 disruption generated a R3 LPS (Figure 2) like the one reported for the orthologous B. abortus mutants [11], [19]. It is annotated as phosphomannomutase gene and, because of the severe core defect, we proposed before the name of manBcore [11]. However, taking into account the lack of R phenotype in the mutant in the manB gene of region wbk (see above) and the absence of additional manB annotations in Brucella, manBcore plus the contiguous manC seem the only genes of the pathway providing mannose for both perosamine and core synthesis (Figure 2A).

Mutants blocked in O-PS export.

To study whether the R mutants could elicit antibodies to the O-PS, we infected mice and tested the sera in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with Brucella native hapten, a N-formylperosamine polysaccharide that lacks core sugars [32]. We observed reactivity in the sera of mice infected with 108 or 1010 colony forming units (CFU) of the wzm (BMEI1415) mutant or with 1010 CFU of the wa** (BMEI1326) mutant (0,810 and 0,714 optical density readings, respectively; 1∶25 dilution). However, the antibody levels were lower than those induced by 106 CFU of the 16M NalR parental strain (1,480 readings for the same dilution). When we tested extracts of these mutants by gel immunodiffusion with sera from Brucella infected cattle, we observed a component giving a reaction of identity with the native hapten polysaccharide (Figure 3). Moreover, 1H-NMR analysis of the extracts showed the signals of α1,2- α1,3-linked N-formylperosamine polysaccharides [17] plus a small signal at 2.06 ppm corresponding to the N-acetyl group of an unidentified N-acetylated aminosugar. Upon cell fractionation, the polysaccharides were detected in the envelope and cytosol of the wzm and wa** mutants, respectively.

Figure 3. B. melitensis mutants in genes wa** and wzm synthesize N-formylperosamine polysaccharides.

The figure shows a gel immunodiffusion analysis of the polysaccharides obtained from mutants Bm16MRwa** and Bm16MRwzm. Well 16MNalR contained the LPS of the parental strain and shows both the slow diffusing S-LPS and the fast diffusing native hapten polysaccharide precipitin lines; (S), serum from naturally infected cattle.

Mutant designation.

Based on the above analyses, we designated the mutants according to the original strain (Bm16M or BmH38), the phenotype (R) and the LPS gene disrupted (Table 1 and Figure 2).

The LPS defects alter key topological, physicochemical and biological surface properties of Brucella

It is known that outer membrane proteins (Omp) are more exposed on R than on S brucellae [11], [33], and we confirmed this for R1, R2, and R3 mutants using monoclonal antibodies (Moabs) to Omp1, Omp2b, Omp31, Omp25, Omp19, Omp16 and Omp10 (not shown). Less is know about the topology of R-LPS epitopes and, therefore, we tested the mutants with the appropriate Moabs. In all cases, absence of O-PS correlated with exposure of the outer core (Figure 4, left panel) and the lipid A disaccharide (Moab Bala-1; not shown). Surprisingly, the R1 and R2 but not the R3 mutants failed to react with the inner core Moab Baro-2 (Figure 4, left panel). Since Baro-2 was produced by immunization with B. abortus [34], we confirmed its reactivity using B. abortus 2308 mutants in per (Ba2308Rper), wbkA (Ba2308RwbkA), wa** (Ba2308Rwa**) and manBcore (Ba2308R manBcore) (Figure 4 left panel). As expected, all these R mutants but wa** [11] reacted with Baro-2. Then, we tested representative B. melitensis R-LPS by Western blot. The LPS of BmH38RwbkD (R1), Bm16MRper (R1) and Bm16MRwa** (R2) but not that of BmH38RmanBcore (R3) reacted with Baro-1 (Figure 4, right panel). Conversely, Baro-2 failed to detect an inner core epitope in the R1 and R2 but not in the R3 LPS (Figure 4, right panel). These results show hitherto undescribed LPS core differences between B. abortus and B. melitensis.

Figure 4. LPS epitopes in smooth B. abortus and B. melitensis strains and their cognate R mutants.

Whole bacteria (left panel) or B. melitensis R-LPS representative of the R1, R2 and R3 types (right panel) were probed with monoclonal antibodies of the indicated specificity (Ba2308, B. abortus 2308; Bm16MNalR, B. melitensis 16M NalR; codes for the R mutants are those used in the text).

All R mutants displayed an increased surface hydrophobicity, more markedly in B. melitensis than in B. abortus (Figure 5, left panel), and also in sensitivity to the polycationic lipopeptide polymyxin B (not shown). The latter effect was explained by the increase in negative Zeta potential (surface charge) of the R mutants (Figure 5 right panel). However, we did not observe a clear correlation between Zeta potential and LPS defects (−58 to −64 mV for R1, −55 to −58 mV for R2, and −66 to −68 mV for R3), like that obtained for the S. minnesota R chemotypes (Ra, −39 mV; Rc, −44 mV, and Re, −53 mV). Since the LPS core is complete in Ra, lacks the distal N-acetyl-glucosamine in Rc, and is reduced to two Kdo residues in Re, the comparison shows that the outer core does not balance the negative charge of the Kdo-lipid A section in Brucella LPS. In support of this interpretation, all Brucella R mutants behaved like the S. minnesota Re mutant when the Zeta potential was measured in the presence of the polycation poly-L-lysine (Figure 5, right panel). The Zeta potential value and the polycation effects were clearly reduced in the S parental strains S. minnesota HL63 and B. melitensis H38 NalR (Figure 5, right panel) or B. melitensis 16M NalR (not shown).

Figure 5. Surface hydrophobicity (partition in hexanol/water) and charge (zeta potential in dependence of poly-L-lysine) of smooth B. abortus and B. melitensis parental strains and their cognate R mutants.

For Brucella, the genes (left panel) or the strain codes (right panel) indicated are those used in the text. S. minnesota controls were: wild type, SmWT; Ra LPS mutant, SmRa; Re LPS mutant, SmRe.

Resistance to complement-mediated killing in normal serum is a biologically significant property of S brucellae [35]. We found that, whereas the B. melitensis S strains were only partially affected by normal sheep (Figure 6) or cattle serum (not shown), all B. melitensis R mutants but BmH38RwbkD were killed within 20 hours. Interestingly, neither the B. abortus 2308 NalR S strain nor the cognate R mutants survived under the same conditions (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Survival of smooth B. melitensis and B. abortus parental strains and their cognate R mutants in normal ovine serum.

R mutants show different patterns of attenuation

To assess attenuation, we inoculated BALB/c mice with three doses of each R mutant or with 106 CFU of the parental strains and vaccine Rev 1, and determined the CFU numbers in the spleens. All R mutants were less persistent than the parental strains, with differences that allowed classifying them into four broad attenuation patterns (Figure 7A). Pattern 1 comprised BmH38Rper, BmH38RwbkD and BmH38RwbkF, all of the R1 type. They multiplied at 106 CFU/mouse and, no matter the dose, reached spleen counts at week 2 similar to those of the parental strain. Then, the CFU decreased markedly. Pattern 2 included BmH38RwboA, Bm16MRwboB, Bm16MRwbkE, BmH38RwbkE, Bm16MRwbkA, Bm16MRgmd, Bm16MRper (all R1) and Bm16MRpgm (R2). Although able to replicate, they never reached the parental strain level and were cleared at rates directly related to the inoculum size. Pattern 3 included Bm16MRwzm and Bm16MRwa**, two mutants with internal N-formylperosamine polysaccharides and reduced in vitro growth rates. Although not multiplying when inoculated at 106 CFU, they persisted at relatively high numbers at the end of the experiment (week 6) for the 107 or 108 CFU doses. To further examine their persistence, we inoculated mice with 108 CFU/mouse and examined them 6, 9 and 12 weeks after infection. The CFU/spleen at week 6 were similar to those of the first experiment, declined more than 2 logs at week 9 and the mutants were cleared by week 12. Remarkably, the results of pattern 3 mutants (107 or 108 CFU) and Rev 1 almost overlapped at weeks 2, 3, 6 (Figure 7), 9 and 12 (not shown). Finally, we separated BmH38RmanBcore (R3 and accelerated growth in vitro) into pattern 4 because its clearance started as early as week 2 and was complete between weeks 3 and 6.

Figure 7. Attenuation patterns of B. melitensis R mutants and vaccine Rev 1 in BALB/c mice in comparison with smooth B. melitensis parental strains .

Panel A, evolution of CFU/spleen; panel B, spleen weights.

As reported before [36], splenomegaly caused by virulent Brucella increased throughout the experiment (Figure 7B). In contrast, the weights of the spleens of Rev 1 inoculated mice peaked at week 2 and declined afterwards. Only pattern 1 R mutants inoculated with 108 CFU induced transient splenomegaly similar to that of Rev 1 (Figure 7B).

Some R mutants reach the Brucella replicative niche in macrophages

Since a brucellosis vaccine must persist long enough to trigger protective immunity, it has to be able to multiply intracellulary. Thus, we studied the multiplication of BmH38Rper, Bm16MRper and (patterns 1 and 2, both R1), Bm16MRwzm (pattern 3, R1 and internal N-formylperosamine polysaccharides), Bm16MRwa** (pattern 3, R2 and internal N-formylperosamine polysaccharides) and BmH38RmanBcore (pattern 4, R3) in bone-marrow derived macrophages (BMDM). We found that only BmH38RmanBcore was unable to grow in BMDM, and that no mutant was as efficient as the virulent strain (Figure 8, left panel). We also examined the intracellular fate of representative mutants. After 24 hours, some bacteria of patterns 1, 2 and 3 were in calreticulin (endoplasmic reticulum marker)-positive but also in LAMP1-positive compartments. At this time, pattern 3 bacteria were in comparatively high amounts in the calreticulin-positive compartments of some BMDM and BmH38RmanBcore was completely degraded in LAMP1-positive compartments (Figure 8). To extend these observations, we determined the location of mutants BmH38RwbkF, BmH38RwbkD (both of pattern 1), Bm16MRwa** (pattern 3), and BmH38RmanBcore (pattern 4) 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after infection. For the latter, colocalization with LAMP1 was observed 0.5 hours after infection, and full destruction by the 4th hour. BmH38RwbkD and BmH38RwbkF were quickly in LAMP1-positive compartments but intact bacteria persisted up to 8 to12 hours and some reached calreticulin-positive compartments. Bm16MR1.17wa** also transited through LAMP1-positive compartments and then co-localized efficiently with calreticulin, persisting intact at least 24 hours.

Figure 8. Multiplication and intracellular localization in BMDM of representative B. melitensis R mutants.

Left panel, evolution of intracellular bacteria CFU numbers. Right panel, colocalization of selected R mutants (immunostained in red) with LAMP1 (immunostained in blue) or calreticulin (immunostained in green) in BMDM.

R mutants can be ranked by their ability to immunize against virulent bacteria

Using BmH38RwbkD (pattern 1), Bm16MRwa** (pattern 3), and BmH38RmanBcore (pattern 4), we determined the conditions necessary to rank R mutants by their ability to induce protection by the most favorable (i.e. intraperitoneal) route [8]. We studied the vaccine dose (from 106 to 108 CFU), two strains of mice (BALB/c and CD-1), the vaccination-challenge interval (4 and 8 weeks), and the challenge dose (104 and 105 CFU) and strain (16M and H38). A vaccine dose below 108 CFU or a 105 CFU challenge resulted in poor or no protection, and a vaccination-challenge interval of 8 weeks did not improve the evaluation. Similarly, there was no influence of the challenge strain regardless of the 16M or H38 background of the mutants. Finally, the Brucella-susceptible BALB/c mice yielded a larger span between control groups (PBS [150 mM NaCl, 7 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM K2HPO4; pH 6.85]- and Rev 1-inoculated mice) and more homogenous results than CD-1 mice, thereby allowing better statistical evaluations (see Figure S3).

Then, we performed a first experiment (Table 2) which ranked the 14 R mutants into three sets. The first one (Bm16MRwa**, Bm16MRwzm, BmH38RwbkF, BmH38RwbkD, and BmH38Rper) generated protection not significantly different from that provided by Rev 1 (at the dose and by the route used as reference in mice). A second set (BmH38RwboA, Bm16MRpgm, and Bm16MRgmd) generated protection but less than Rev 1, and the third set (6 mutants) failed to protect. For a better discrimination, we tested the first set of mutants (plus two mutants of the third set as references) using 10 mice per group (Table 2). The results confirmed Bm16MRwa**, Bm16MRwzm and BmH38RwbkF as the best R vaccines. However, protection by BmH38Rper and BmH38RwbkD was less than that by Rev 1.

Table 2. Protective efficacy against B. melitensis of B. melitensis R mutants (108 CFU) administered intraperitoneally.

Only attenuation pattern 3 R mutants approach Rev 1 as B. melitensis vaccines

Intraperitoneal inoculation is unpractical in the natural host. Thus, we tested the efficacy of the five best R mutants when administered subcutaneously. As shown in Table 3, only pattern 3 mutants compared to Rev 1 under these conditions. However, the dose used was one thousand fold higher than that of Rev 1 (108 and 105 CFU, respectively). Higher doses of these R mutants generated abscesses and other untoward effects.

Table 3. Protective efficacy against B. melitensis of selected B. melitensis R mutants administered subcutaneously.


We present here a comprehensive study aimed to clarify the value of brucellosis R vaccines that is based on an understanding of the genetics of Brucella LPS synthesis, rather than on empirical approaches. LPS synthesis is known to occur through three main pathways that lead to the synthesis of the O-PS, core oligosaccharide and lipid A [37]. Some steps of the last two pathways overlap to generate the (Kdo)2- lipid IVa precursor on which sugars other than Kdo are then assembled to generate a complete R-LPS (R1 in the classification used in the present work). Accordingly, deficiencies in these processes generate deeper R (R2 and R3) phenotypes than those affecting O-PS synthesis. Polymerization of the latter takes place on the bactoprenol carrier which subsequently shuttles the polymer to the periplasm, the place where it is linked to R1-type R-LPS. Therefore, mutants in O-PS synthesis generate R1 phenotypes which may be accompanied or not by accumulation of O-PS precursors and may have side effects on other envelope located functions. In addition to the above-summarized pathways, there are ancillary routes providing the core and O-PS building units. Genomic surveys show that the three main pathways are present in Brucella [38], and the mutations studied here affect key steps of the O-PS and core pathways as well as the synthesis of precursors.

Although we screened about 16,500 transposon mutants from B. melitensis H38 NalR and 16M NalR, and expanded the investigation to those ORFs with suggestive annotations that flanked some eventually spurious R mutants, we only found one gene (wbkD) that, to the best of our knowledge, had not been identified as a LPS gene or as a virulence-related gene [11], [16], [19], [24], [39][41]. On this basis, it seems that only the wbk (Figure 2B) and wbo regions encode proteins dedicated to Brucella O-PS synthesis. Intriguingly, wbk contains several genes that, upon disruption, do not generate R phenotypes. They include wbkB [16] and BMEI1396, annotated as manB. We proposed before that the putative man genes in wbk could be involved in O-PS synthesis [11] but the evidence that disruption of BMEI1396 fails to generate a R phenotype is against this hypothesis. It is still possible that manBcore (BMEII0899) could internally complement the defect in the wbk manB mutant. However, since manBcore mutants show a deep R phenotype, it would remain to be explained why the converse internal complementation is not effective. Studies on the expression and activity of the proteins encoded by the putative man genes in wbk are necessary for a definite conclusion. The wbk region also contains the ABC transporter genes (wzm and wzt) typical of homopolymeric O-PS, and the implication of wzm and wzt in O-PS export was established in a previous work [16]. We extended this demonstration by purifying the N-formylperosamine polysaccharide built up by Bm16MRwzm and showing its location in the cell envelope, in all likelihood bound to bactoprenol, a linkage that could overcome its haptenic nature and account for its immunogenicity. In contrast, the polysaccharide built up by mutant BmR16MRwa** was found mostly in the soluble fraction. This suggests a transient bactoprenol linked state and, consistent with the R2 LPS pattern, it may be that Wa** transfers a sugar necessary for the linkage of the O-PS to the core. This step occurs in the periplasm [37], but our results are not in disagreement with this because the physical fractionation methods used do not allow to distinguish periplasmic and cytosoluble fractions in Brucella. Interestingly, both the wa** and the wzm mutants showed delayed generation times consistent with a linkage of the O-PS precursor to bactoprenol and a reduced availability of the latter for other envelope biogenesis processes. The retarded growth of mutant pgm, however, can be explained by the role of Pgm in the metabolic steps that use glucose-nucleotides. Obviously, it can be reasoned that the manBcore mutant owes its accelerated growth to absence of O-PS synthesis. These differences in growth rates are relevant traits in a live vaccine candidate.

The attenuation of R Brucella mutants has been known for decades [3] and it evidently relates to changes in the bacterial surface that affect the interaction of bacteria with cells and soluble effectors of the immune system. Concerning the host cells, it has been observed that R mutants penetrate more actively and display higher adherence to nonphagocytic and phagocytic cells than S Brucella [42][48]. In addition, Porte et al. [39] found that, whereas virulent B. suis cells select lipid rafts to enter into murine macrophages, R B. suis manBcore cells do not, hence showing the critical role of the O-PS at the port of entry. This role could be that of a negative modulator of non specific adherence which would allow receptors to act, that of the ligand of an unknown cell receptor, or both [39], [41]. Indeed, a definition of the nature of the surface changes should contribute to better understand this key aspect of Brucella virulence. Despite this, only one study conducted with the spontaneous R mutant B. abortus 45/20 has partially addressed the overall effects of the O-PS deficiency [49]. Here, we demonstrate that the surface of the Brucella outer membrane, once devoid of the O-PS, becomes simultaneously highly hydrophobic and negatively charged, and that the negative charge relates exclusively to inner core-lipid A groups. That this negative charge was similarly abrogated by the O-PS in S. minnesota HL63 and S Brucella leads to the conclusion that we are dealing with general physicochemical properties not linked to the particular sugar (N-formylperosamine) in S Brucella O-PS. Accordingly, the overall physicochemical picture for the R mutant surface is that of a mosaic of negative charges scattered among hydrophobic spots. Such a surface should both allow and bring about multiple non specific interactions with eukaryotic membranes that should override any specific binding. This picture is in keeping with the observations on the invasiveness and attachment of R Brucella mutants and supports the hypothesis that the O-PS acts at least in part as a negative modulator. Clearly, the loss of the ability to select the port of entry and the possible unspecific interactions with the membranes of the internal compartments where Brucella multiplies are factors that can contribute to attenuation.

Concerning the surface topological changes, we confirmed the differences in Omp and lipid A epitope exposure existing between R and S bacteria [11], [33]. However, the differences in LPS core epitopes observed between B. abortus and B. melitensis were unexpected. This divergence adds to the absence of Omp31 and possible surface elements related to the 25 Kb deletion of B. abortus chromosome II [21], and both have to be considered in the light of other cell surface properties. Over 40 years ago, it was observed that normal human serum has a more powerful killing activity on B. abortus than on B. melitensis or B. suis and that R Brucella mutants are cytophatic for monocytes, a phenomenon that would leave the invaders exposed to the bactericidal action of serum [3], [50][52]. These findings and hypothesis have been updated in recent works. Fernandez-Prada et al. [53] noted that B. abortus 2308 wboA mutants (R1 according to our results) are more sensitive to normal human serum than homologous B. melitensis 16M mutants. This species difference is supported and extended by our experiments with the R1, R2, and R3 mutants from B. abortus 2308 NalR, B. melitensis H38 NalR and 16M NalR and sheep and cattle sera. Moreover, since the difference persisted in the B. abortus and B. melitensis manBcore mutants (which display similar core stubs), it is unlikely that core variations in B. abortus and B. melitensis could account for it. Therefore, it seems that the absences of Omp31 and possible surface elements related to the 25Kb deletion in B. abortus [21] account for the greater sensitivity to normal serum, as proposed by Fernandez-Prada et al. [53]. These same authors also found that B. melitensis 16M and its wboA R mutant are resistant to normal human serum. In our conditions, however, only one of the seven R mutants (BmH38RwbkD) survived, indicating that complement sensitivity is a usual characteristic of B. melitensis R mutants whose contribution to attenuation cannot be dismissed.

Interestingly, not all R mutants were equivalent in surface properties, suggesting that they could display different degrees of cell interaction and virulence which would allow the selection of optimal vaccines. Assessment of this point required appropriate laboratory models and we used both animals and cultured cells. The animal used in the vast majority of works evaluating Brucella virulence is the mouse, and spleen CFU is the main criterion. However, literature perusal shows that mouse studies with R mutants vary in infectious dose from 104 to 108 CFU [8]. Preliminary observations and some apparently conflicting results reported in the literature led us to test the possibility that a combination of doses could yield better analyses. This was proved correct and we classified the mutants into four broad patterns. Pattern 1 mutants inoculated at the lower dose multiplied transitorily reaching spleen counts similar to those of Rev 1 and the S virulent strains. Consistent with this, they reached compartments bearing the endoplasmic reticulum marker calreticulin and multiplied there. These R mutants were the only ones inducing a splenomegaly similar to that of Rev 1. Since splenomegaly correlates with IFN-γ and IL-12 levels in mouse brucellosis and both cytokines are decisive for mounting effective immunoresponses to Brucella [54], it seemed that pattern 1 mutants stimulated immunity better than other R mutants. This interpretation was born out by the ranking of the mutants by their immunizing ability. Despite this, pattern 1 mutants were not equivalent to Rev 1 because the latter strain persisted longer in spleens. Concerning pattern 2, a remarkable feature was a conversely related dose-persistence relationship, a trend that, although less clearly, was also perceived in pattern 1. It has been shown that Brucella behaves as a stealthy parasite that avoids detection by innate immunity at the onset of infection, thus retarding an adaptive cellular response and making possible for the parasite to reach sheltered intracellular niches [35]. This ability is not related to the induction of regulatory cytokines such as IL-10 but rather to a reduction in the pathogen-associated molecular pattern of those envelope molecules (most notably LPS) normally recognized by TLR bearing cells [35]. According to this, it can be predicted that mutants in LPS, a molecule critical in avoiding innate immunity by Brucella, could elicit innate immunity (and hence cellular immunity) in a dose-dependent fashion and be thus eliminated faster at higher than at lower doses. Indeed, our results are consistent with this prediction. Concerning pattern 3 mutants, it can be proposed that their longer generation times account for the lower CFU in spleen and, in keeping with the Brucella stealthy strategy, for a lower stimulation of innate immunity that favors persistence. These mutants did not multiply at the level of the parental strains in BMDM but they were surprisingly efficient in reaching endoplasmic reticulum-derived compartments. Although the first characteristic could relate to their long generation time, we have no clear hypothesis to propose for the second observation. We can speculate that it is somehow connected to the internal O-PS precursor they carry, since these mutants were the only ones that had detectable amounts of it. It has to be considered that a fraction of the pattern 3 bacteria was destroyed by BMDM, and that this should release the O-PS precursor within the cell. The effect of free N-formylperosamine polysaccharides within the Brucella containing vacuoles has not been studied and, in the light of our results and of the presence of these free polysaccharides in S brucellae [32], this is an aspect that deserves attention. Finally, the marked attenuation of the pattern 4 mutant was evident in all experiments and in keeping with the notion [11] that a severe core LPS damage abrogates useful immunogenicity.

It is interesting that all pattern 1 mutants derived from B. melitensis H38 and that some homologous ones in B. melitensis 16M (like Bm16MRper) belonged to pattern 2 and were poor vaccines. These mutants behaved similarly in BMDM, suggesting that early events in host cells are not the reason for the differences in mice. It seems, therefore, that the overall genetic background of the parental strains is relevant and that selection of Brucella vaccines cannot be based only on the identification of a target gene whose dysfunction generates attenuation. In this regard, it is worth commenting that the literature reveals that strain16M stocks sometimes yield CFU/spleen lower that those obtained in our experiments with either H38 or our 16M. We have tested the virulence of 16M obtained from several laboratories and found that, in fact, some were less virulent than others, suggesting that the stability of this strain cannot be taken for granted (M.J. Grilló, and J.M. Blasco, unpublished results).

Like virulence studies, the laboratory assessment of brucellosis vaccines has been almost always based on experiments in mice, and there is a useful mouse model for the evaluation of S19 and Rev 1 vaccine stocks. This model uses a tight set of conditions chosen to reflect in mice field observations on residual virulence and immunogenicity [55]. However, there are no studies in the natural hosts with different Brucella R vaccines. Therefore, one aim of our work was to set up a model to rank R mutants for their ability to induce protection, and we defined some experimental conditions for this. Using these conditions, we found that the top candidates were Bm16MRwa**, Bm16MRwzm, BmH38RwbkF, BmH38RwbkD, and BmH38Rper. These mutants belonged to patterns 1 and 3, were able to multiply in BMDM and to reach the niche where virulent brucellae replicate, and all but Bm16MRwa** were of the R1 phenotype. This result with Bm16MRwa** is not in contradiction with our previous observation that a complete core was required for maximal efficiency of R B. abortus vaccines in mice [11] because Bm16MRwa** (and Bm16MRwzm) elicited anti-O-PS antibodies, and these are known to be protective in mouse brucellosis [54]. Therefore, we cannot rule out that priming by the O-PS precursors could contribute to an antibody response to the challenge strain accounting in part for protection. In fact, these two mutants are reminiscent of a wboA complemented RB51 construct that produces internal O-PS and that has been shown to generate better protection in mice than RB51 [18]. Also in keeping with the idea that the internal O-PS set the difference with other R mutants, they were the only ones that matched Rev 1 when we assessed subcutaneously, even though at doses one thousand fold higher. Therefore, our results lead to the conclusion that no R mutant completely devoid of O-PS is equal to Rev 1 in the mouse model. On these grounds, and taking into account the range of genetic defects and properties of the R mutants tested, it seems unlikely that any R vaccine lacking the ability to induce anti S-LPS antibodies could match classical brucellosis vaccines in the natural host. Nevertheless, a definite conclusion requires studies with a definite set of R vaccine candidates in sheep and goats.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

B. melitensis 16M (S, virulent) is the reference strain of biovar 1 [56] and B. melitensis H38 (S, virulent) is a virulent biovar 1 strain [15]. The corresponding NalR strains were selected on tryptic soy agar containing 25 µg/ml of the antibiotic. B. abortus 2308 NalR (S, virulent) and its R mutants (Ba2308Rper [formerly Ba 9.49], Ba2308RwbkA [Ba 2.17], Ba2308Rwa** [Ba 80.16] and Ba2308RmanBcore [Ba55.30]) have been described previously [11]. B. abortus bvrS::Tn5 2.13 is an avirulent S strain that carries a normal O-PS but is defective in several outer membrane proteins tightly linked to the LPS [57]. S. minnesota HL63 is a S strain and its HL100 Ra, HL105R5 Rc, and HL111R595 Re mutants are bacteria bearing a R-type LPS with intact (Ra), truncated outer core (Rc) or highly defective (deep R) core [58]. All these bacteria were kept in skim milk at −80°C, and aliquots grown on tryptic soy agar or broth when needed (repeated in vitro passage was systematically avoided). The reference B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine was originally obtained from the INRA station at Nouzilly (France) and conserved freeze-dried. For routine use, the stocks were rehydrated and cultured only once before preparing the appropriate bacterial suspensions (see below) [56].

Mutagenesis, ORF identification and complementation analysis

Mini-Tn5 mutagenesis was performed by mating B. melitensis 16M NalR or H38 NalR with Escherichia coli SM10 (λpir) carrying the suicidal plasmid pUT/Km [59], and mutants selected on tryptic soy agar with nalidixic acid (25 µg/ml) and kanamycin (50 µg/ml). R mutants were identified by the crystal violet exclusion test and the lack of reactivity with anti-S-LPS IgG [11]. To test the stability of the mutants, 3×103 CFU of each mutant were first seeded on tryptic soy agar, either plain or supplemented with nalidixic acid (25 µg/ml) or kanamycin (50 µg/ml). Mutants showing no variation in CFU numbers (one-way ANOVA) on these media and a stable R phenotype were inoculated intraperitoneally into 8–10 weeks old BALB/c mice (106 CFU/mouse). Two weeks later, the spleens were seeded on tryptic soy agar and colonies retested for roughness and for the presence of Tn5 by Southern blot. The DNA flanking the mini-Tn5 insertion in the selected mutants was cloned and sequenced [45], and ORFs identified using the database and links at When the regions adjacent to the mini-Tn-5 included ORFs with annotations suggestive of sugar or polysaccharide synthesis, mutants were generated in B. melitensis 16M using a disruptive strategy [60]. To this end, an internal fragment of 300 bp. localized in 5′ part of the ORF was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and cloned into the EcoRV restriction site of plasmid pSKoriTKan. Constructs were transferred into B. melitensis 16M NalR by conjugation with E. coli S17 (λpir), and the recombinant clones were selected on tryptic soy agar with nalidixic acid and kanamycin (see above). Chromosome insertion was assessed either by Southern blot with a probe specific for the kanamycin-resistance cassette, or by PCR using two primers annealing at the start of the disrupted ORF and a primer specific for the pSKoriTKan vector. When necessary, confirmation of the disrupted sequence was achieved by PCR. In frame deletion mutants were constructed by overlapping PCR as described previously [61].

For complementation, the PCR amplified gene was first cloned into plasmid pCR®2.1 (Invitrogen S.A., Barcelona, Spain) using T4 ligase and transformed into E. coli TOP10 F'. From this, the construct was subcloned into pBBR1MCS-4, transformed first into E. coli Xl1Blue KS+ and then into E. coli SM10 λ pir for conjugation with the corresponding mutant. Alternatively, the B. melitensis ORFeome [62] was used. The appropriate clones were extracted and the ORF was subcloned into plasmid pRH001 [63]. The construct was introduced into the R mutant by mating with E. coli S17-1 and the conjugants were selected on tryptic soy agar with nalidixic acid and chloramphenicol.

Bacteriological characterization

Crystal violet exclusion and sensitivity to S (Tb, Wb, Iz) and R (R/C) brucellaphages were studied as described by Alton et al. [56]. Growth curves were obtained simultaneously for all bacteria in a BioScreen C ( instrument. For this purpose, multi-well plates containing 250 µl/well of tryptic soy broth were prepared, and 5×106 CFU of each strain inoculated into triplicate wells. To monitor growth, the optical density at 470 nm (OD470) was measured at 10 min intervals.

LPS and polysaccharide extraction

Whole cell LPS.

Bacteria (0.5 g wet weight) were extracted with 2% SDS, 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) (10 ml), digested with DNase (30 µg), RNase (30 µg) and proteinase K (1.5 mg), the LPS precipitated with isopropanol and analyzed directly by SDS-PAGE [64].

Extraction of S- and R-LPS with organic solvents.

S-LPS was obtained from the phenol phase of a water-phenol extract, and purified by nuclease and proteinase K digestion and by removal of free lipids [26], [32]. LPS from R mutants was extracted with phenol-chloroform-light petroleum (2∶5∶8) (165 mg of freeze-dried bacteria/ml) [65].

Extraction and purification of intracellular polysaccharides.

BmR16MRwzm and BmR16MRwa** cells were resuspended in 0.5 N trichloroacetic acid (30 g wet weight in 150 ml) and stirred at 4°C overnight. After removal of cell debris (15000× g for 15 min), the supernatant was neutralized with NaOH, mixed with 3 volumes of ethanol (24 h at −20°C), the precipitate collected (5000× g for 15 min), dialyzed and freeze-dried. This crude extract was chromatographed at room temperature on a Bio-Gel P-10 (Bio-Rad Laboratories S.A., Madrid, Spain) column (Vt 150 ml, Vo 48 ml) in 5 mM phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.2), 0.05% NaN3. Fractions (2 ml) were examined for cyclic β-glucans by high performance thin layer chromatography and for immunoreactive polysaccharides by immunodiffusion with sera from Brucella infected cattle [32], and those free from glucans were pooled, dialyzed and freeze-dried. In addition, cells were disintegrated in the presence of nucleases in a 40K French Pressure Cell Press (SLM Instruments Inc., Urbana, Ill.) operating at 140 Kg/cm2, and the soluble and cell envelope fractions separated by ultracentrifugation (60000× g, 2 h). The soluble fractions and crude trichloroacetate envelope extracts were tested for immunoreactive polysaccharides without further purification.

S-LPS hydrolytic polysaccharide and native hapten polysaccharide.

The S-LPS hydrolytic polysaccharides and the native hapten polysaccharide of B. melitensis 16M were prepared as described before [32]. The hydrolytic polysaccharide of B. abortus 2.13 S-LPS, which is highly pure due to the absence of group 3 Omp tightly bound to LPS in this bvrS mutant [57], was obtained by a similar procedure.

LPS and polysaccharide characterization.

The Kdo assay, and the SDS-PAGE and Western blot procedures have been described previously [11], [32]. Moabs Baro-1 and Baro-2 recognize the outer and inner core epitopes of Brucella LPS, respectively, and Bala-1 recognizes the lipid A disaccharide [34]. Moab 31D2 (Ingenasa, S.A., Madrid, Spain) is specific for the C-epitope of the S-LPS. 1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 25 and 70°C in D2O solution using Varian Inova 600 and 800 spectrometers equipped with 5 mm PFG triple-resonance probes. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm. using external sodium 3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3-2H4)-propanoate (TSP, δH 0.00). Data processing was performed using vendor-supplied software. TOCSY [66] experiments with mixing times of 10, 30, and 120 ms were used for assignment of resonances.

Surface hydrophobicity and Zeta potential

To assess cell surface hydrophobicity [67], stationary phase bacteria were inactivated in 0.5% NaN3 at 37°C overnight, washed twice with 97 mM K2HPO4, 53 mM KH2PO4, 0.8 mM MgSO4, 21 mM urea, and adjusted to an OD470 of 1.0. Equal volumes of this suspension and n-hexadecane were mixed, stirred briefly, incubated at room temperature for 15 min, and the partition coefficient (1- [DO470 water phase)/DO470 n-hexadecane]) calculated. The surface charge density was measured as the elec­trophoreti­cally effective potential (Zeta potential) [68]. For this, bacteria were inactivated with 0.5% phenol, washed and resuspended in 1 mM CsCl, 10 mM HEPES 10 mM (pH 7.2) at an OD600 of 0.2. Measurements were performed at 25°C in a Zetamaster instrument using the PCS 1.27 software (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) and the settings of aqueous solutions (viscosity = 1,002 cP; dielectric constant = 80,4), either in plain buffer or in buffer supplemented with poly-L-lysine (MW 14600, Sigma-Aldrich Química, S.A., Madrid, Spain).

Surface epitope mapping

Epitope exposure was tested by dot blot [11] using the above anti-LPS Moabs and the anti-Omp Moabs Omp10 (A68/07G11/C10), Omp16 (A68/08C03/G03), Omp19 (A76/05C10/A08), Omp25 (Omp25) (A70/06B05/A07, A76/02C12/C11, A68/04B10/F05, A68/07D11/B03 and A68/28G06/C07), Omp31 (A59/10F09/G10), Omp2b (A63/03H02/B01), and Omp1 ([Omp89] A53/10B02/A01) [11], [33], [69]. The reaction was measured (OD per mm2) using the Imagemaster system (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden).

Sensitivity to non immune serum

Exponentially growing bacteria were adjusted to 104 CFU/ml and then mixed with fresh sheep or cattle normal serum (45 µl of cells plus 90 µl of serum per well) in microtiter type plates in duplicate. After incubation for 1, 3, 6 or 18 h at 37°C h with gentle stirring, brain heart infusion broth (200 µl/well) was added, mixed and 100 µl aliquots plated out. The results were expressed as the % survival with respect to the CFU in the inoculum.

Animal studies

Female BALB/c mice of 7 weeks of age (Charles River Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain) were housed in the animal building of the CITA laboratory (registration number ES 50297012005) with water and food ad libitum. Animals were randomly allotted and acclimated for 1–2 weeks before the start of the experiments. Animal handling and experimental procedures were in accordance with European (DOCE 86/609/EEC), National (RD1201/2005), and Regional (Ley 11/2003) directives, and were supervised by the Ethical Committee of the Institution. To prepare the inocula, bacteria were suspended in PBS and adjusted spectrophotometrically to the appropriate CFU/ml (a suspension with an optical density at 600 nm of 0.170 contained ca. 109 CFU/ml) in the same buffer. In all the experiments, the number of CFU administered was determined retrospectively by culturing triplicate aliquots of each inoculum.


Groups of 20 BALB/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with ca. 106, 107 or 108 CFU/mouse in 0.1 ml of PBS. One, 2, 3, and 6 weeks after inoculation, 5 mice of each group were anaesthetized by CO2 inhalation, bled intracardiacally and the spleens removed. For the Bm16MRwzm and Bm16MRwa** mutants, additional groups of 15 BALB/c mice were inoculated IP at 108 CFU/mouse, and spleen CFU counts performed 6, 9, and 12 weeks later. Controls received 106 CFU/mouse of B. melitensis H38, 16M or Rev 1 by the same route. The spleens were processed [70] to calculate the mean and SD (n = 5) of the log10 of CFU per spleen, and the results evaluated using the Fisher's Protected Least Significant Differences test.

Antibodies to O-PS.

Antibodies were measured in each mouse of the above-described groups. In addition, BALB/c mice (n = 5) were inoculated IP with 1010 CFU of the appropriate R mutant and bled 6 weeks after this inoculation. Individual blood samples were taken by intracardiac puncture, incubated at room temperature for 4 hours, centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes, and sera collected and frozen at −80°C until use. The antibody response was assessed in an indirect ELISA [70] with the N-formylperosamine native hapten polysaccharide adsorbed to the plates [32]. Sera from non-inoculated mice were used as negative controls.


The following conditions were determined to be optimal to rank R mutants by their ability to generate protection against virulent B. melitensis. Groups of 5 BALB/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 106, 107 or 108 CFU/mouse of B. melitensis R mutant and challenged 4 weeks later with 1×104 CFU of B. melitensis H38 injected by the same route. Two weeks later, the spleens processed for CFU counting [70]. To differentiate the challenging strain from the R mutants persisting in the spleens, samples were plated on both BAB and BAB supplemented with 25 µg/ml of kanamycin, and plates with isolated colonies flooded with a crystal violet-oxalate solution [56]. The results, expressed as the mean and SD of the log10 of CFU per spleen of the challenge strain, were analyzed using the Fisher's Protected Least Significant Differences (more than 4 groups) or Bonferroni's test (4 or less groups). In a second experiment, the 5 top ranked mutants plus the 2 mutants inducing the lowest protection were reassessed using 10 mice per group. After ranking, the mouse model of protection was used for evaluating the efficacy of the 5 best R mutants (i.e. Bm16MRwa**, Bm16MRwzm, BmH38RwbkF, BmH38RwbkD, and BmH38Rper) as vaccines when inoculated (108 CFU/mouse) subcutaneously in mice (n = 10). In all experiments, controls were mice (n = 5 or n = 10) inoculated subcutaneously with 105 CFU/mouse of Rev 1 or with 0.1 ml PBS.

Studies in BMDM

R mutants representative of the main attenuation patterns were studied in comparison with the parental strains. BMDM were obtained from 8 to 10 week-old female C57BL/6 black mice, infected after 6 days of in vitro maturation (50 CFU per cell) and, at appropriate times, coverslips were processed and immunostained [71]. Briefly, R mutants were labeled using the serum of a B. ovis infected sheep and a Texas Red conjugated monoclonal antibody to sheep IgG and the parental strains using the serum from a B. abortus infected cattle and an Alexa® 594 (Molecular Probes; Eugene, OR) conjugated anti-cattle monoclonal antibody. The lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1) and the endoplasmic reticulum marker calreticulin were detected using rat anti LAMP1 MoAb plus a Cys5 conjugated anti-rat IgG monoclonal antibody and a specific rabbit anti-calreticulin serum plus an Alexa® 488 (Molecular Probes) conjugated anti- rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody. The images were obtained in a confocal microscope [71]. For mutants BmH38RwbkF, BmH38RwbkD, Bm16MRwa**, and BmH38RmanBcore the images were taken at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after infection. In addition, 24 h post-infection images were obtained for BmH38Rper, Bm16MRwzm, and Bm16MRper.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Growth curves of smooth parental strains and representative B. melitensis R mutants in tryptic soy broth at 37°C. Plots labeled as A, B and C correspond to accelerated, normal or retarded growth, respectively.

(3.20 MB TIF)

Figure S2.

1H-NMR spectrum of B. abortus 2.13 LPS polysaccharide.

(0.09 MB TIF)

Figure S3.

BALB/c mice allow a better discrimination of vaccines than CD-1 mice. Plots represent the 50 (line within box), 25 and 75 (lower and upper box limits) percentiles and minimal and maximal values (lower and upper lines) of the CFU/spleen in mice vaccinated with Rev 1 or PBS and challenged with BmH38 or Bm16M.

(1.23 MB TIF)

Table S1.

ORF shown not to be involved in B. melitensis LPS synthesis.

(0.04 MB DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MJG MZ JJL JPG JMB IM. Performed the experiments: DG MJDM TA VAG RMD RC PM CM. Analyzed the data: DG MJG ILG MI AW GW JJL JPG JMB IM. Wrote the paper: IM.


  1. 1. Ariza J (1999) Brucellosis: an update. The perspective from the Mediterranean basin. Rev Med Microbiol 10: 125–135.
  2. 2. Maudlin I, Weber S (2006) The control of neglected zoonotic diseases: a route to poverty alleviation. Geneva.
  3. 3. Spink WW (1956) The nature of brucellosis. Minneapolis: Lund Press Inc.
  4. 4. Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Roth F, Bonfoh B, de SD, et al. (2007) Human benefits of animal interventions for zoonosis control. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 527–531.
  5. 5. Garin-Bastuji B, Blasco JM, Grayon M, Verger JM (1998) Brucella melitensis infection in sheep: present and future. Vet Res 29: 255–274.
  6. 6. Nicoletti PL (1990) Vaccination. In: Nielsen KH, Duncan JR, editors. Animal Brucellosis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 283–299.
  7. 7. Schurig GG, Sriranganathan N, Corbel MJ (2002) Brucellosis vaccines: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol 90: 479–496.
  8. 8. Moriyón I, Grilló MJ, Monreal D, Gonzalez D, Marín C, et al. (2004) Rough vaccines in animal brucellosis: structural and genetic basis and present status. Vet Res 35: 1–38.
  9. 9. Adone R, Ciuchini F, Marianelli C, Tarantino M, Pistoia C, et al. (2005) Protective properties of rifampin-resistant rough mutants of Brucella melitensis. Infect Immun 73: 4198–4204.
  10. 10. Winter AJ, Schurig GG, Boyle SM, Sriranganathan N, Bevins JS, et al. (1996) Protection of BALB/c mice against homologous and heterologous species of Brucella by rough strain vaccines derived from Brucella melitensis and Brucella suis biovar 4. Am J Vet Res 57: 677–683.
  11. 11. Monreal D, Grilló MJ, González D, Marín CM, de Miguel MJ, et al. (2003) Characterization of Brucella abortus O-polysaccharide and core lipopolysaccharide mutants and demonstration that a complete core is required for rough vaccines to be efficient against Brucella abortus and Brucella ovis in the mouse model. Infect Immun 71: 3261–3271.
  12. 12. Kahl-McDonagh MM, Ficht TA (2006) Evaluation of protection afforded by Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis unmarked deletion mutants exhibiting different rates of clearance in BALB/c mice. Infect Immun 74: 4048–4057.
  13. 13. Fretin D, Fauconnier A, Kohler S, Halling SM, Leonard S, et al. (2005) The sheathed flagellum of Brucella melitensis is involved in persistence in a murine model of infection. Cell Microbiol 7: 687–698.
  14. 14. Rajashekara G, Glover DA, Krepps M, Splitter GA (2005) Temporal analysis of pathogenic events in virulent and avirulent Brucella melitensis infections. Cell Microbiol 7: 1459–1473.
  15. 15. Cloeckaert A, Jacques I, Grilló MJ, Marín CM, Grayon M, et al. (2004) Development and evaluation as vaccines in mice of Brucella melitensis Rev.1 single and double deletion mutants of the bp26 and omp31 genes coding for antigens of diagnostic significance in ovine brucellosis. Vaccine 22: 2827–2835.
  16. 16. Godfroid F, Cloeckaert A, Taminiau B, Danese I, Tibor A, et al. (2000) Genetic organisation of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen biosynthesis region of Brucella melitensis 16M (wbk). Res Microbiol 151: 655–668.
  17. 17. Perry MB, Bundle DR (1990) Lipopolysaccharide antigens and carbohydrates of Brucella. In: Adams LG, editor. Advances in brucellosis research. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. pp. 76–88.
  18. 18. Vemulapalli R, He Y, Buccolo LS, Boyle SM, Sriranganathan NM, et al. (2000) Complementation of Brucella abortus RB51 with a functional wboA gene results in O-antigen synthesis and enhanced vaccine efficacy but no change in rough phenotype and attenuation. Infect Immun 68: 3927–3932.
  19. 19. Allen CA, Adams LG, Ficht TA (1998) Transposon-derived Brucella abortus rough mutants are attenuated and exhibit reduced intracellular survival. Infect Immun 66: 1008–1016.
  20. 20. Price NP, Momany FA (2005) Modeling bacterial UDP-HexNAc: polyprenol-P HexNAc-1-P transferases. Glycobiology 15: 29R–42R.
  21. 21. Vizcaíno N, Cloeckaert A, Zygmunt MS, Fernández-Lago L (2001) Characterization of a Brucella species 25-Kilobase DNA fragment deleted from Brucella abortus reveals a large gene cluster related to the synthesis of a polysaccharide. Infect Immun 69: 6738–6748.
  22. 22. Kneidinger B, Larocque S, Brisson JR, Cadotte N, Lam JS (2003) Biosynthesis of 2-acetamido-2,6-dideoxy-L-hexoses in bacteria follows a pattern distinct from those of the pathways of 6-deoxy-L-hexoses. Biochem J 371: 989–995.
  23. 23. Bowser DV, Wheat RW, Foster JW, Leong D (1974) Occurrence of quinovosamine in lipopolysaccharides of Brucella species. Infect Immun 9: 772–774.
  24. 24. McQuiston JR, Vemulapalli R, Inzana TJ, Schurig GG, Sriranganathan NM, et al. (1999) Genetic characterization of a Tn5-disrupted glycosyltransferase gene homologue in Brucella abortus and its effect on lipopolysaccharide composition and virulence. Infect Immun 67: 3830–3835.
  25. 25. Caroff M, Bundle DR, Perry MB, Cherwonogrodzky JW, Duncan JR (1984) Antigenic S-type lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus 1119-3. Infect Immun 46: 384–388.
  26. 26. Velasco J, Bengoechea JA, Brandenburg K, Lindner B, Seydel U, et al. (2000) Brucella abortus and its closest phylogenetic relative, Ochrobactrum spp., differ in outer membrane permeability and cationic peptide resistance. Infect Immun 68: 3210–3218.
  27. 27. Moreno E, Jones LM, Berman DT (1984) Immunochemical characterization of rough Brucella lipopolysaccharides. Infect Immun 43: 779–782.
  28. 28. Ito M, Aono R, Horikoshi K (1993) Identification of 2-amino-2,6-dideoxy-D-glucose (D-quinovosamine), isolated from the cell walls of the alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. Y-25, by 500-MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 242: 173–180.
  29. 29. Knirel YA, Paredes L, Jansson PE, Weintraub A, Widmalm G, et al. (1995) Structure of the capsular polysaccharide of Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal containing D-galactose 4,6-cyclophosphate. Eur J Biochem 232: 391–396.
  30. 30. Heinrichs DE, Yethon JA, Amor PA, Whitfield C (1998) The assembly system for the outer core portion of R1- and R4-type lipopolysaccharides of Escherichia coli. The R1 core-specific beta-glucosyltransferase provides a novel attachment site for O-polysaccharides. J Biol Chem 273: 29497–29505.
  31. 31. Ugalde JE, Czibener C, Feldman MF, Ugalde RA (2000) Identification and characterization of the Brucella abortus phosphoglucomutase gene: role of lipopolysaccharide in virulence and intracellular multiplication. Infect Immun 68: 5716–5723.
  32. 32. Aragón V, Diaz R, Moreno E, Moriyón I (1996) Characterization of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis native haptens as outer membrane O-type polysaccharides independent from the smooth lipopolysaccharide. J Bacteriol 178: 1070–1079.
  33. 33. Bowden RA, Cloeckaert A, Zygmunt MS, Bernard S, Dubray G (1995) Surface exposure of outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide epitopes in Brucella species studied by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and flow cytometry. Infect Immun 63: 3945–3952.
  34. 34. Rojas N, Freer E, Weintraub A, Ramírez M, Lind S, et al. (1994) Immunochemical identification of Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharide epitopes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1: 206–213.
  35. 35. Barquero-Calvo E, Chaves-Olarte E, Weiss DS, Guzman-Verri C, Chacon-Diaz C, et al. (2007) Brucella abortus uses a stealthy strategy to avoid activation of the innate immune system during the onset of infection. PLoS ONE 2: e631.
  36. 36. Crawford RM, van der Verg LL, Yuan L, Hadfield TL, Warren RL, et al. (1996) Deletion of purE attenuates Brucella melitensis infection in mice. Infect Immun 64: 2188–2192.
  37. 37. Raetz CR, Whitfield C (2002) Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 635–700.
  38. 38. Iriarte M, González D, Delrue R-M, Monreal D, Conde R, et al. (2004) Brucella Lipopolysaccharide: Structure, Biosynthesis and Genetics. In: López-Goñi I, Moriyón I, editors. Brucella: Molecular and Cellular Biology. Wymondham, UK: Horizon Bioscience. pp. 159–192.
  39. 39. Porte F, Naroeni A, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Liautard JP (2003) Role of the Brucella suis lipopolysaccharide O antigen in phagosomal genesis and in inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion in murine macrophages. Infect Immun 71: 1481–1490.
  40. 40. Kohler S, Foulongne V, Ouahrani-Bettache S, Bourg G, Teyssier J, et al. (2002) The analysis of the intramacrophagic virulome of Brucella suis deciphers the environment encountered by the pathogen inside the macrophage host cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15711–15716.
  41. 41. Delrue RM, Lestrate P, Tibor A, Letesson JJ, de Bolle X (2004) Brucella pathogenesis, genes identified from random large-scale screens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231: 1–12.
  42. 42. Jiménez de Bagüés MP, Terraza A, Gross A, Dornand J (2004) Different responses of macrophages to smooth and rough Brucella spp.: relationship to virulence. Infect Immun 72: 2429–2433.
  43. 43. Fernández-Prada CM, Zelazowska EB, Nikolich M, Hadfield TL, Roop RM, et al. (2003) Interactions between Brucella melitensis and human phagocytes: Bacterial surface O-polysaccharide inhibits phagocytosis, bacterial killing, and subsequent host cell apoptosis. Infect Immun 71: 2110–2119.
  44. 44. Pei J, Ficht TA (2004) Brucella abortus rough mutants are cytopathic for macrophages in culture. Infect Immun 72: 440–450.
  45. 45. Sola-Landa A, Pizarro-Cerdá J, Grilló MJ, Moreno E, Moriyón I, et al. (1998) A two-component regulatory system playing a critical role in plant pathogens and endosymbionts is present in Brucella abortus and controls cell invasion and virulence. Mol Microbiol 29: 125–138.
  46. 46. Rittig MG, Kaufmann A, Robins A, Shaw B, Sprenger H, et al. (2003) Smooth and rough lipopolysaccharide phenotypes of Brucella induce different intracellular trafficking and cytokine/chemokine release in human monocytes. J Leukoc Biol 74: 1045–1055.
  47. 47. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF (1990) Penetration and intracellular growth of Brucella abortus in nonphagocytic cells in vitro. Infect Immun 58: 2320–2328.
  48. 48. Detilleux PG, Deyoe BL, Cheville NF (1990) Entry and intracellular localization of Brucella spp. in Vero cells: fluorescence and electron microscopy. Vet Pathol 27: 317–328.
  49. 49. Schurig GG, Pringle AT, Breese SS (1981) Localization of brucella antigens that elicit a humoral immune response in Brucella abortus-infected cells. Infect Immun 34: 1000–1007.
  50. 50. Braun W, Pomales-Lebron A, Stinebring WR (1958) Interactions between mononuclear phagocytes and Brucella abortus strains of different virulence. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 97: 393–397.
  51. 51. Freeman BA, Kross DJ, Circo R (1961) Host-parasite relationships in brucellosis. II. Destruction of macrophage cultures by Brucella of different virulence. J. J Infect Dis 108: 333–338.
  52. 52. Wilson JB, Dasinger BL (1960) Biochemical properties of virulent and avirulent strains of brucellae. Proc New York Acad Sci 88: 1155–1166.
  53. 53. Fernández-Prada CM, Nikolich M, Vemulapalli R, Sriranganathan NM, Boyle SM, et al. (2001) Deletion of wboA enhances activation of the lectin pathway of complement in Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. Infect Immun 69: 4407–4416.
  54. 54. Baldwin CL, Goenka R (2006) Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella: does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection? Crit Rev Immunol 26: 407–442.
  55. 55. Grilló MJ, Bosseray N, Blasco JM (2000) In vitro markers and biological activity in mice of seed lot strains and commercial Brucella melitensis Rev 1 and Brucella abortus B19 vaccines. Biologicals 28: 119–127.
  56. 56. Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM (1988) Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory. Paris, France: INRA.
  57. 57. Guzman-Verri C, Manterola L, Sola-Landa A, Parra A, Cloeckaert A, et al. (2002) The two-component system BvrR/BvrS essential for Brucella abortus virulence regulates the expression of outer membrane proteins with counterparts in members of the Rhizobiaceae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 12375–12380.
  58. 58. Holst O (1999) Chemical structure of the core region of lipopolysaccharides. In: Brade H, Opal SM, Vogel SN, Morrison DC, editors. Endotoxin in health and disease. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 115–154.
  59. 59. Sangari FJ, Agüero J (1991) Mutagenesis of Brucella abortus: comparative efficiency of three transposon delivery systems. Microb Pathog 11: 443–446.
  60. 60. Haine V, Sinon A, Van Steen F, Rousseau S, Dozot M, et al. (2005) Systematic targeted mutagenesis of Brucella melitensis 16M reveals a major role for GntR regulators in the control of virulence. Infect Immun 73: 5578–5586.
  61. 61. Conde-Álvarez R, Grilló MJ, Salcedo SP, de Miguel MJ, Fugier E, et al. (2006) Synthesis of phosphatidylcholine, a typical eukaryotic phospholipid, is necessary for full virulence of the intracellular bacterial parasite Brucella abortus. Cell Microbiol 8: 1322–1335.
  62. 62. Dricot A, Rual JF, Lamesch P, Bertin N, Dupuy D, et al. (2004) Generation of the Brucella melitensis ORFeome version 1.1. Genome Res 14: 2201–2206.
  63. 63. Hallez R, Letesson JJ, Vandenhaute J, De B, X (2007) Gateway-based destination vectors for functional analyses of bacterial ORFeomes: Application to the min system in Brucella abortus. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 1375–1379.
  64. 64. Garin-Bastuji B, Bowden RA, Dubray G, Limet JN (1990) Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting analysis of smooth-lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Brucella biovars related to A and M specificities. J Clin Microbiol 28: 2169–2174.
  65. 65. Galanos C, Luderitz O, Westphal O (1969) A new method for the extraction of R lipopolysaccharides. Eur J Biochem 9: 245–249.
  66. 66. Braunschweiler L, Ernst RR (1983) Coherence transfer by isotropic mixing: application to proton correlation spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 53: 521–528.
  67. 67. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (2007) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9: 33.
  68. 68. Cafiso D, McLaughlin A, McLaughlin S, Wimshi A (1983) Measuring electrostatic potentials adjacent of membranes. Methods Enzymol 171: 342–346.
  69. 69. Cloeckaert A, de Wergifosse P, Dubray G, Limet JN (1990) Identification of seven surface-exposed Brucella outer membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies: immunogold labeling for electron microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun 58: 3980–3987.
  70. 70. Grilló MJ, Manterola L, de Miguel MJ, Muñoz PM, Blasco JM, et al. (2006) Increases of efficacy as vaccine against Brucella abortus infection in mice by simultaneous inoculation with avirulent smooth bvrS/bvrR and rough wbkA mutants. Vaccine 24: 2910–2916.
  71. 71. Celli J, De Chastellier C, Franchini DM, Pizarro-Cerdá J, Moreno E, et al. (2003) Brucella evades macrophage killing via VirB-dependent sustained interactions with the endoplasmic reticulum. J Exp Med 198: 545–556.