Mitotic progression is controlled by proteolytic destruction of securin and cyclin. The mitotic E3 ubiquitin ligase, known as the anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), in partnership with its activators Cdc20p and Cdh1p, targets these proteins for degradation. In the presence of defective kinetochore-microtubule interactions, APC/CCdc20 is inhibited by the spindle checkpoint, thereby delaying anaphase onset and providing more time for spindle assembly. Cdc20p interacts directly with Mad2p, and its levels are subject to careful regulation, but the precise mode(s) of APC/C Cdc20 inhibition remain unclear. The mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC, consisting of Mad3p, Mad2p, Bub3p and Cdc20p in budding yeast) is a potent APC/C inhibitor. Here we focus on Mad3p and how it acts, in concert with Mad2p, to efficiently inhibit Cdc20p. We identify and analyse the function of two motifs in Mad3p, KEN30 and KEN296, which are conserved from yeast Mad3p to human BubR1. These KEN amino acid sequences resemble ‘degron’ signals that confer interaction with APC/C activators and target proteins for degradation. We show that both Mad3p KEN boxes are necessary for spindle checkpoint function. Mutation of KEN30 abolished MCC formation and stabilised Cdc20p in mitosis. In addition, mutation of Mad3-KEN30, APC/C subunits, or Cdh1p, stabilised Mad3p in G1, indicating that the N-terminal KEN box could be a Mad3p degron. To determine the significance of Mad3p turnover, we analysed the consequences of MAD3 overexpression and found that four-fold overproduction of Mad3p led to chromosome bi-orientation defects and significant chromosome loss during recovery from anti-microtubule drug induced checkpoint arrest. In conclusion, Mad3p KEN30 mediates interactions that regulate the proteolytic turnover of Cdc20p and Mad3p, and the levels of both of these proteins are critical for spindle checkpoint signaling and high fidelity chromosome segregation.
Citation: King EM, van der Sar SJ, Hardwick KG (2007) Mad3 KEN Boxes Mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 Turnover, and Are Critical for the Spindle Checkpoint. PLoS ONE 2(4): e342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000342
Academic Editor: Sue Biggins, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States of America
Received: February 21, 2007; Accepted: March 8, 2007; Published: April 4, 2007
Copyright: © 2007 King et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: KGH and SJAvdS are funded by the Wellcome Trust, of which KGH is a Senior Research Fellow. EMJK was funded by a BBSRC Studentship.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
During mitosis and meiosis cells segregate their replicated genomes to daughter nuclei . Any errors will result in aneuploidy, which typically leads to disease or cell death . Cells employ surveillance systems, referred to as checkpoints, to ensure that their genomes are replicated, repaired and segregated with high fidelity. The spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset until all sister chromatid pairs are bi-oriented on the mitotic spindle –. Mitotic progression and exit are regulated to a large extent by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. The major mitotic E3 ubiquitin ligase is known as the anaphase promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C, ). The APC/C requires the action of an activator: early in mitosis this is Cdc20p and later in mitosis and in G1 it switches to Cdh1p . Cdc20p is the key target of the spindle checkpoint , , and its abundance and activity are regulated at many levels including transcription, post-translational modification and proteolysis –. Cdc20p is both an APC/C activator and an APC/C substrate , and it was recently demonstrated that levels of Cdc20p are very precisely regulated in budding yeast mitosis . If there is too much Cdc20p in the cell, then the spindle checkpoint is unable to inhibit it , .
APC/C substrates including securin (Pds1p) and cyclin (Clb2p) contain recognition signals, typically known as destruction or D boxes, and/or KEN boxes , . Once poly-ubiquitinated by the APC/C, the D or KEN box containing protein is degraded by the proteasome. It is generally thought that KEN boxes are recognised by the Cdh1p activator, rather than Cdc20p which preferentially recognises D boxes –. However, this is probably an over-simplification and it has also been shown that the vertebrate APC/C is capable of recognising destruction motifs directly, in both a Cdc20p and Cdh1p-independent manner .
Models of the spindle checkpoint mechanism have been significantly enhanced by information derived from structural Mad2 studies , , and dynamic imaging (FRAP) of the checkpoint proteins and Cdc20p –. These studies have lead to models in which a dynamic pool of Mad2p interacts with a stable Mad2p-Mad1p “template” at the kinetochore. After kinetochore transit, the dynamic Mad2p is released in a form that efficiently interacts with and inhibits Cdc20p , . One thing lacking from these models is a clear role for the Mad3p/BubR1 checkpoint component. Not only are these proteins required for normal spindle checkpoint function –, but in fission yeast we have shown that Mad3p is even required for the overexpression of Mad2p to induce a metaphase arrest . Such results indicate that Mad2p-Cdc20p complex formation is unlikely to be sufficient for checkpoint arrest in vivo. It has also been shown that the MCC (Bub3-BubR1-Mad2-Cdc20) is a far more potent inhibitor than Mad2p in vitro , , .
Here we investigate the role(s) of Mad3p in Cdc20p inhibition, and in particular focus on the two conserved KEN boxes in Mad3p, both of which we show to be necessary for spindle checkpoint function. Importantly, mutation of the N-terminal Mad3p KEN box (mad3-KEN30AAA) also completely prevents Cdc20p binding. This mutation blocks MCC formation, dramatically reduces Cdc20p turnover in mitosis, and has a checkpoint null phenotype. We propose that this N-terminal KEN box, which is conserved from yeast Mad3p to human BubR1, is a critical link required for MCC formation and spindle checkpoint inhibition of Cdc20p.
In addition, we propose that the N-terminal KEN box acts as a degron during G1, leading to Mad3p turnover in a Cdh1-APC/C dependent manner. We analyse the effects of Mad3p overproduction and observe chromosome bi-orientation defects and significant chromosome loss during the recovery from checkpoint arrest.
Mad3p contains two conserved KEN boxes
Mad3p, and its vertebrate homologue BubR1, contain a highly conserved KEN box motif near their N-termini. Indeed this is used to distinguish BubR1 from the related, but functionally distinct, checkpoint component Bub1p . The Mad3/BubR1 family also contain a second KEN box (Fig 1A). The function(s) of these motifs in Mad3/BubR1 has not previously been addressed.
A) Mad3/BubR1 domain structure–schematic diagrams of the Mad3 and Bub proteins indicate the organisation of their functional domains. B) Clustal×alignment of the two conserved KEN boxes found in Mad3/BubR1. Species indicated are Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Scer), Saccharomyces paradoxus (Spar), Saccharomyces mikatae (Smik), Saccharomyces kudriavzevii (Skud), Saccharomyces bayanus (Sbay), Saccharomyces castellii (Scas), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Spom), Candida albicans (Calb), Arabidopsis thaliana (Atha), Drosophila melanogaster (Dmel) and Homo sapiens (Hsap). Numbers indicate residue position within protein sequence.
Our previous studies suggested that the steady state level of Mad3p was relatively constant through the budding yeast cell cycle . To investigate whether Mad3p was degraded by APC/C-dependent proteolytic turnover we analysed its stability, in mitosis and in G1. To do this we synchronised cells, added cycloheximide to prevent new protein synthesis, and then analysed the level of Mad3p through a time course using polyclonal anti-Mad3p antibodies. The levels of Mad3p after a prolonged G1 arrest were rather low (not shown), presumably because much of it had been degraded. Therefore, we repeated this experiment after a pulse of MAD3 expression from the strong inducible GAL1 promoter. Mad3p levels fell slowly in nocodazole, and significantly faster in G1 during an alpha factor arrest (Fig. 2A). As the APC/C is very active in G1 this finding is consistent with APC-dependent turnover and Mad3p being a late mitotic/G1 substrate. If the Mad3p KEN boxes act as destruction signals recognised by the APC/C, Mad3p should be stabilised in conditional (ts) alleles of APC/C components, and possibly in the absence of the late APC/C activator, Cdh1p. To test this we carried out cycloheximide chase experiments in G1 arrested cells in cdc16-123 (apc-ts) and cdh1Δmutants, along with cdc4-1 and cdc34-2 strains as controls. The latter are ts alleles of components of another E3 ubiquitin ligase, the SCF . All strains expressed Mad3p from the strong inducible GAL1 promoter. The cdh1 and cdc16 mutations both stabilised Mad3p (Mad3p stabilisation was also observed in cdc23-1–data not shown), whereas cdc34 and cdc4 did not, demonstrating that Mad3p is degraded in a Cdh1-APC/C-dependent manner (Fig. 2B/C).
A) Mad3p is unstable in G1. Cells expressing GAL-MAD3 were first synchronised in G1 (with alpha factor) or mitosis (with nocodazole) in raffinose media, and then a pulse of Mad3p expression was induced by 30 minutes of growth in media containing 2% galactose. Cells were then washed with glucose media (YPD) and cycloheximide was added to inhibit new protein synthesis. The G1 and mitotic arrests were maintained, samples taken at the times indicated, and whole cell extracts immunoblotted with anti-Mad3p antibodies to determine the remaining level of Mad3p. B) Mad3p turnover in G1 is APC/C dependent. Cells expressing GAL-MAD3 were synchronised in G1 (with α-factor) in raffinose media, and then a pulse of Mad3p expression was induced by 30 minutes of growth in media containing 2% galactose. Cells were then shifted to 36°C (restrictive temperature for cdc16-ts) for 30 minutes, washed with glucose media (YPD) and cycloheximide was added to inhibit new protein synthesis. The G1 arrest was maintained, samples taken at the times indicated, and whole cell extracts immunoblotted with α-Mad3p antibodies to determine the remaining level of Mad3p. C) SCF mutants do not stabilise Mad3p in G1. cdc4 and cdc34 strains expressing GAL-MAD3 were analysed for Mad3p turnover as in B. D) mad3KEN30AAA stabilises Mad3p in G1. mad3Δ cells containing GAL driven wild-type or mad3-ken mutants were arrested in alpha factor, and then Mad3p was induced for 30 minutes with galactose media. Cells were then washed in glucose media and cycloheximide was added to prevent new protein synthesis. Samples were taken at the times indicated, and whole cell extracts immunoblotted with anti-Mad3p antibodies for the level of Mad3p.
To analyse the role of the KEN boxes in Mad3p turnover we replaced them, either individually or in combination, with triple alanine (AAA) residues. When we analysed the stability of these mutant Mad3 proteins in G1 arrested cells there was little difference in mad3-KEN296AAAp stability when compared to wild-type Mad3p, but Mad3-KEN30AAAp was clearly stabilised (half-life of ∼90 minutes cf. 25 minutes for wild-type, Fig. 2D). Thus Mad3p turnover in G1 is dependent on Cdh1-APC/C activity and its own N-terminal KEN box (KEN30).
Mad3p KEN boxes have checkpoint functions
Next we analysed the effect of KEN box mutations on spindle checkpoint function(s) of Mad3p. When tested for their ability to complement a mad3Δ strain, all three mutants (KEN30AAA, KEN296AAA and the double mutant) were sensitive to the anti-microtubule drug benomyl. Their sensitivity was similar to that of the mad3 null mutant (mad3Δ, Fig. 3A). Checkpoint assays were also carried out in liquid media containing nocodazole to depolymerise microtubules. These revealed that the ken mutants were unable to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion, scored by imaging GFP-marked chromosome IV, and died just as rapidly as the mad3Δ in the presence of nocodazole (Fig. 3B/C). Time courses and immunoblotting demonstrated that the mad3-ken mutants were unable to stabilise key mitotic regulators, Pds1p (Securin) and Clb2p (Cyclin B), when cells were challenged with nocodazole (Fig. 3D). Thus both Mad3 KEN boxes are critical for spindle checkpoint function.
A) The mad3-ken mutants failed to complement the benomyl sensitivity of mad3Δ. The constructs indicated were transformed into the mad3Δ strain, and then diluted and plated onto YPD plates containing the indicated concentration of benomyl (µg/ml). Photos were taken after three days growth at 24°C. B) The mad3-ken mutants died rapidly. The strains from above were grown to log phase, synchronised in G1 with α-factor, released and then nocodazole was added to 20 µg/ml. At the times indicated, cells were taken, diluted, plated out and scored for their ability to form colonies on rich media. C) The mad3-ken mutants failed to maintain sister chromatid cohesion. In parallel these strains, which contain GFP-marked chromosomes, were scored for sister chromatid cohesion at 0 (α-factor arrested) and four hours after release into nocodazole-containing media. D) The mad3-ken mutants are unable to prevent securin and cyclin from being degraded. Similar strains to those above, but containing Pds1-Myc13 were synchronised in α-factor, then released into nocodazole media (20 µg/ml). Time points were taken, whole cell extracts made and immunoblotted for Pds1 (anti-myc) and cyclin levels (anti-Clb2p).
The N-terminal Mad3 KEN box is required for Cdc20p binding and for mitotic Cdc20p turnover
Two clear modes of action of Mad3p have been described in budding yeast, both relating to inhibition of Cdc20p: mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC, which in budding yeast is Bub3p-Mad3p-Mad2p-Cdc20p) formation  and Cdc20p turnover . Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that neither KEN box mutation affected Bub3p complex formation (Fig. 4A), from which we conclude that the mutations have had little effect on the overall folding or stability of Mad3p. Importantly, the KEN30AAA mutation completely abolished the binding of Mad3p to both Cdc20p and Mad2p. This was not the case for KEN296AAA (Fig. 4B), although in some experiments a minor reduction in MCC levels was observed. Thus KEN30 is required for MCC assembly and/or stability.
A) mad3-KEN-AAA mutants can bind Bub3p. Native extracts were made from the indicated strains, containing Bub3-myc13, and Mad3p complexes were immunoprecipitated then immunoblotted for Mad3p and Bub3p (anti-myc). B) mad3-KEN30AAA mutants don't bind to Mad2p or Cdc20p. Cells were arrested in mitosis (with hydroxyurea and nocodazole) and native extracts were made from the indicated strains, containing Cdc20p-myc13. Mad3p was immunoprecipitated then immunoblotted for Mad3p, Mad2p and Cdc20p (anti-myc).
Surprisingly, Cdc20p turnover in early mitosis was shown to be independent of its own destruction boxes, but dependent on the Mad proteins . We have found that all of the mad and bub mutations perturb Cdc20p turnover, and lead to a range of increased stability with mad3Δ having the most profound effect (data not shown). We were particularly interested to test whether the Mad3p KEN boxes had a role to play in Cdc20p turnover. To do this we synchronised cells early in mitosis (in several ways–see Materials and Methods), added cycloheximide to prevent new protein synthesis, and then took time points to analyse the Mad3p and Cdc20p levels in whole cell extracts. Whilst any effect on Mad3p turnover was subtle in these mitotic time courses, the effects on Cdc20p turnover were very pronounced (Fig. 5A/B). KEN30AAA led to stabilisation of Cdc20p, similar to that seen in a mad3Δ background (∼6-fold stabilisation), whereas KEN296AAA had little effect (Fig. 5C). Thus in two biochemical assays mad3-KEN30AAA behaved like the mad3Δ strain: there was no MCC complex and Cdc20p was stabilised. Either or both of these effects could explain its checkpoint-defective phenotype. Mad3-KEN296AAA did not significantly reduce Cdc20p binding nor stabilise Cdc20p, whereas the double KEN mutant behaved like KEN30AAA in all assays tested. These results demonstrate that Mad3p binding is necessary for Cdc20 turnover, and suggest the intriguing possibility that the N-terminal Mad3 KEN box acts in trans as a Cdc20p destruction signal during early mitosis.
A) Strains were arrested in mitosis (with nocodazole and hydroxyurea), and cycloheximide was added (time 0) to prevent new protein synthesis. Time points were taken and immunoblotted for Cdc20p levels (anti-myc) and Mad3p levels. B) Quantitation of the Cdc20p and Mad3p levels.
Mad3 overexpression causes bi-orientation defects
We have demonstrated that Mad3p is degraded late in mitosis and G1 in a Cdh1-APC/C dependent manner. To understand why Mad3p is subject to such regulation we decided to analyse the effects of Mad3p overexpression.
We introduced extra copies of MAD3 and the mad3-ken mutants, expressed from the MAD3 promoter and integrated at the TRP1 locus, into a strain containing a wild-type MAD3 gene. Quantitative western blotting revealed that the strains shown expressed ∼4-fold the wild-type level of Mad3p (Fig. 6A), and we found that all of these strains were sensitive to benomyl (Fig. 6B). Many transformants were analysed in this manner, and were found to have different expression levels of Mad3p (reflecting different copy numbers of integrated constructs). It was clear that increasing the level of Mad3p expression leads to increased benomyl sensitivity (data not shown).
A) Strains expressing extra integrated copies of wild-type MAD3 or ken mutant mad3 were immunoblotted to quantitate their expression levels. B) Overexpression of Mad3p induces benomyl sensitivity. The over-expression strains were diluted and plated onto rich YPD media with or without the addition of 15 µg/ml of benomyl. Plates were photographed after 3 days growth at 24°C. C) Strains overexpressing Mad3p die quickly in the presence of nocodazole. The indicated strains were pre-synchronised in G1 with alpha factor, released into media containing 20 µg/ml nocodazole, and cells were plated out at indicated times. Viability was scored as the percentage of colonies formed relative to the zero time point. D) Mad3p overexpression has a mild effect on sister-chromatid cohesion. The overexpression strains, which containing GFP marked chromosome V, were synchronised in G1 with alpha factor, then released into media containing nocodazole. Sister-chromatid separation was scored as the percentage of cells containing two clearly separated GFP spots.
Such sensitivity to anti-microtubule drugs could be for a number of reasons, including a defective spindle checkpoint response. We tested whether the strains with excess Mad3p could checkpoint arrest. Cells were pre-synchronised in G1 with alpha-factor, then washed and released into nocodazole-containing media. Analysis of GFP-marked chromosomes indicated that all strains were able to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion relatively efficiently (Fig. 6D). Yet, when we scored the same cultures for viability it was clear that, even though they were able to arrest, they died after 2–4 hours in nocodazole (Fig. 6C). We reasoned that the drug sensitivity might be due to an inability to recover properly from the checkpoint arrest. Therefore we quantitated the ability of strains overexpressing MAD3 to accurately segregate chromosomes in the anaphase following the checkpoint arrest. To do this we pre-synchronised cultures in G1 with alpha factor, released into nocodazole media for 3 hours, and then washed out the nocodazole. We then imaged both spindle poles (SPC42-mCherry) and GFP-marked chromosomes during the ensuing anaphase (Fig. 7A). This experiment demonstrated that the Mad3p-overexpressing strains exhibit chromosome mis-segregation (25–40% for chromosome V), following release from the checkpoint arrest. Such a level of chromosome mis-segregation is significant enough to explain their benomyl-sensitivity.
A) Mad3p overexpression induces chromosome mis-segregation following checkpoint “challenge”. Strains were pre-synchronised with α-factor, released and then arrested with nocodazole. The nocodazole was then washed out and cells arrested in the next G1. Cells were fixed and analysed for the presence of GFP-marked chromosomes. Chromosome V was labelled with GFP and spindle poles with SPC42-mCherry. Arrowheads mark G1 cells containing two copies of chromosome V. B) Mad3p overexpression induces chromosome bi-orientation defects. Cells were pre-synchronised with α-factor, then depleted for Cdc20p through the addition of Methionine. Cells were then released from G1 into media containing nocodazole and benomyl. The microtubule drugs were then washed out to allow soindle assembly, but Cdc20p remained represed to arrest cells in metaphase. Cells were briefly fixed and scored for bi-orientation (breathing centromeres). Centromere IV was labelled with GFP and spindle poles with SPC42-tomato. Scale bars are 5 microns.
To test whether this chromosome mis-segregation was due to a defect in chromosome bi-orientation we employed a strain containing a GFP-marked centromere. This strain has CDC20 under control of the MET promoter, expresses the GFP-Tet repressor and has CENIV “GFP-marked” with an array of Tet operators, and has its SPBs marked with Spc42-tomato. If a replicated chromosome is bi-oriented at metaphase two GFP spots will be observed because the sister centromeres will be pulled apart (centromere breathing) by opposing forces from the two spindle poles . Mono-oriented or unattached chromosomes are not pulled to both poles simultaneously and display a single spot (see Fig. 7B). Cells were synchronised with alpha factor in G1, and then Cdc20p was depleted by the addition of methionine to the media. Cells were then released from G1 into media containing nocodazole for two hours, enabling them to progress to metaphase. The nocodazole was then washed out, allowing cells to re-form a spindle, but CDC20 was still repressed to maintain the metaphase arrest. Cells were fixed at 15 minute time points after nocodazole removal and scored for bi-orientation. An excess of Mad3p led to significant bi-orientation defects during recovery from checkpoint arrest: only 25–30% of cells displayed paired spots after 90 minutes, compared to 50–60% for control strains (Fig. 7B). This effect was not significantly affected by mutation of either KEN box (data not shown). Thus, overexpression of Mad3p perturbs chromosome bi-orientation and leads to significant chromosome loss during recovery from checkpoint arrest.
Here we have identified the N-terminal Mad3p KEN box as a critical link in MCC formation. Interestingly its mutation not only abolishes the MCC and spindle checkpoint function, but also leads to a striking mitotic stabilisation of the Cdc20p checkpoint effector. The same KEN box then appears to act as a Mad3p degron during late mitosis/G1, and we have shown that this Mad3p turnover is dependent on Cdh1-APC/C activity. Overexpression of Mad3p leads to anti-microtubule drug sensitivity, but this is not due to an inactive checkpoint. Rather, excess Mad3p induces bi-orientation defects, which lead to high levels of chromosome mis-segregation during recovery from spindle checkpoint arrest. Thus, the levels of both Cdc20p and Mad3p are subject to careful regulation, and this is important to ensure efficient checkpoint function and high fidelity chromosome segregation.
Mad3p is degraded in a Cdh1-APC/C dependent manner
It has recently been shown that the Mps1 protein kinase is an APC/C substrate. Degradation of Mps1p in anaphase is necessary to prevent the spindle checkpoint from re-activation once sister chromatids separate and are no longer under tension . Mps1p turnover was shown to be dependent on its three D boxes, on Cdc20p in anaphase, and on Cdh1p in G1.
Here we have demonstrated that Mad3p is another component of the spindle checkpoint that is degraded in an APC/C dependent manner. We do not believe that Mad3p degradation is critical to turn off the spindle checkpoint, although it is possible that it could play a role in checkpoint adaptation, and this is currently being explored. Our data is consistent with Mad3p being a Cdh1-APC/C substrate and the N-terminal KEN box acting as a degron. Further experiments are needed to prove this, such as in vitro ubiquitination assays demonstrating that Mad3p is poly-ubiquitinated by the APC/C in a KEN30-dependent fashion. We believe that the major role of its N-terminal KEN box is to enable Mad3p to bind to Cdc20p. This Mad3p-Cdc20p interaction, which is also dependent on Mad2p , is critical for the action of both Mad3p and Mad2p as in vivo anaphase inhibitors.
The Mad3p KEN boxes are both required for spindle checkpoint function
We have demonstrated that both of the conserved KEN boxes are important for Mad3p checkpoint function. The N-terminal KEN box is required for MCC formation and for Cdc20p turnover in early mitosis, as well as for Mad3p turnover in G1 (see Fig. 8). It has previously been shown that the two destruction boxes found in Cdc20p are not required for its turnover in early mitosis . Our data suggests a model in which the Mad3 N-terminal KEN box acts in trans to regulate Cdc20p turnover in mitosis (see Fig. 8B). This could simply be because this KEN box is required for MCC formation, or because it acts in trans as a degron. Further work is necessary to distinguish these possibilities. Lack of other checkpoint proteins also affects Cdc20p turnover (data not shown and ), but lack of Mad3p has the most stabilising effect. These mutations are all known to affect the level of the MCC . Such data suggests that it is a Mad3p-Cdc20p complex, most likely the MCC, which is recognised by the APC/C. Presumably Cdc20p is poly-ubiquitinated more efficiently than Mad3p, and this leads to its relatively short mitotic half-life (∼7 minutes for Cdc20p, rather than ∼90 minutes for Mad3p, see Fig. 5B).
a) Mad3 KEN box interactions. Mad2p and Mad3-KEN30 are both required for stable Mad3p-Cdc20p binding. b) Cdc20p turnover in mitosis: this is dependent on Mad3-KEN30, and Mad2p, suggesting that this Mad3 KEN box acts “in trans” as a Cdc20p degron. c) Mad3p turnover in G1. Mad3p is degraded in a Mad3-KEN30, Cdh1, and APC/C dependent manner.
There is significantly more Mad2p-Cdc20p in budding yeast extracts than there is MCC . However, the role of the Mad2p-Cdc20p complex remains unclear, as it appears to be insufficient to act as an anaphase inhibitor in vivo. In many systems including fission yeast, Mad2p overexpression is sufficient for Cdc20p inhibition and metaphase arrest . However, whilst this arrest is independent of most checkpoint components it does require Mad3p . Mad2p is necessary for Mad3p to bind stably to Cdc20p , and we have now shown that the N-terminal KEN box of Mad3p is also critical for Cdc20p binding (see Fig. 8A). At present we are unable to functionally separate MCC formation from Cdc20p turnover, as both are abolished in mad3-ken30 and neither are affected in mad3-ken296. Until such separation is achieved we are unable to assess the relative importance of these two pathways for Cdc20p inhibition. Interestingly, in the fission yeast S.pombe, whilst Slp1 is turned over in mitosis we find no evidence of Mad3p-dependence (our unpublished data). To our knowledge this has not been analysed in vertebrate systems, and it is possible that the checkpoint-dependent regulation of Cdc20p levels is specific to budding yeast mitosis.
However, the general importance of the N-terminal KEN box for checkpoint functions of Mad3p is well conserved. We have analysed equivalent ken mutations in S. pombe Mad3p with very similar results. Once again, the N-terminal KEN box is required for MCC formation, and the C-terminal motif is not (KGH, manuscript submitted). One striking difference from the budding yeast work presented here, is that in S. pombe we detect a stable interaction between Mad3p, Mad2p and mitotic APC/C. We found that this APC/C interaction is dependent on the N-terminal Mad3p KEN box and on Slp1p. We have found no evidence for stable Madp-APC/C binding in our budding yeast studies (data not shown, and see ).
In vertebrates a large BubR1-APC/C complex has recently been described in checkpoint-arrested cells . Formation of that complex was shown to be dependent on an active checkpoint signal, and to be promoted by Bub1 and Aurora B kinase activities . It will be interesting to see whether the BubR1-APC/C interaction is dependent on the N-terminal KEN box of BubR1. In vitro experiments with vertebrate proteins have demonstrated that BubR1 has multiple Cdc20 binding interactions, that this binding is dependent on Mad2, and that mutation of the N-terminus of BubR1 can abrogate checkpoint arrest . These data are entirely consistent with our findings, and we conclude that the importance of the N-terminus of Mad3/BubR1, for MCC formation and checkpoint function, is conserved from yeast to human.
The vertebrate Emi1 protein has recently been proposed to act as a pseudo-substrate inhibitor of the APC/C . We tested whether in vivo Mad3p overproduction is sufficient to compete with Securin for Cdc20-APC/C. If so, Mad3p overexpression should induce a metaphase arrest. This was not the case, which argues against Mad3p acting as a simple pseudo-substrate inhibitor.
Why is Mad3p subject to Cdh1-APC/C dependent turnover? We found that a four-fold over-expression of wild-type Mad3p (and of the ken mutants) was sufficient to perturb mitosis following anti-microtubule drug treatment. Note, we carefully chose transformants expressing the same level of Mad3p, so any stabilising effect of the ken30 mutation would not be apparent in our overexpression analysis. We provide evidence that the chromosome mis-segregation observed was due to defects in chromosome bi-orientation following spindle checkpoint arrest (Fig. 7). RNAi studies have suggested that loss of human BubR1 perturbs the regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments, possibly by interfering with Aurora B kinase activity . It is tempting to speculate that Mad3p over-expression could also perturb Ipl1p (aurora) activities at budding yeast kinetochores. Alternatively, excess Mad3p could perturb Bub1p functions at kinetochores, most simply through competition for Bub3p. Experiments are underway to test such possibilities, but it is clear that Mad3p levels need to be carefully regulated to ensure efficient bi-orientation and checkpoint signalling. We believe that these Mad3p over-expression findings are relevant to human disease. Loss of BubR1 checkpoint function is lethal in the mouse , and biallelic BubR1 mutations are associated with childhood cancer and aneuploidy in humans . In addition, it has recently been shown that Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice . Our Mad3p studies suggest that overexpression, or dominant mutation, of human BubR1 could perturb checkpoint function or chromosome biorientation and thereby lead to the generation of aneuploidy.
In summary, we have shown that the conserved Mad3p KEN boxes are major determinants of checkpoint-effector (Cdc20p) interaction. We propose that these molecular interactions are central to the mode(s) of Cdc20p-APC/C inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. It is now time to integrate these Mad3/BubR1 findings with the checkpoint models that have been generated from structural studies of Mad2, Mad1 and Cdc20 , . Recent advances in the structural analysis of the Bub proteins are a significant step in this direction –. In addition, we have shown that the N-terminal Mad3 KEN box is an important determinant of the stability of both Mad3p and Cdc20p. The levels of both of these proteins are very carefully regulated in yeast. If there is too much Cdc20p the spindle checkpoint is unable to efficiently inhibit it , , and if there is too much Mad3p cells display bi-orientation defects. Either of these would have significant consequences for the cell, and could be relevant to the generation of aneuploidy in human disease due to BubRI defects .
Materials and Methods
Yeast strains, media and standard techniques
All yeast strains used derivatives of W303 (ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1 can1-100 ssd1-d2) and are listed in Table 1.
Mutation of KEN boxes
pKH535 is derived from pKH534 , which is YCplac22-based and contains the MAD3 promoter. The MAD3 ORF was amplified generating a BamHI-EcoRI fragment and cloned in to pKH534. To make plasmids encoding the mad3-ken mutants we introduced point mutations into pKH535 using the Stratagene QuikChange method. These CEN-based plasmids were used to obtain the data in Fig. 3B,C and D.
To integrate mad3 mutants into the genome, we excised a PmlI-EcoRI fragment (containing CEN4, ARS1 and TRP1) from these mutant plasmids and replaced it with a PmlI-EcoRI fragment from YIplac204 (containing TRP1) to generate derivatives that could be targeted to the TRP1 locus following linearization with BsgI. These strains (KH375-378) were used in Fig. 3A.
Generation of anti-Mad3p antibody
To obtain purified recombinant Mad3p we used the IMPACT-CN expression and purification system (New England Biolabs). MAD3 was amplified from pKH535 and cloned into pKYB1 such that it was expressed as an intein-fusion protein. Protein expression and purification was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions, using a 36-hour self-cleavage reaction. Antiserum was affinity-purified as previously described . Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitations were performed as previously described .
Benomyl sensitivity, rate of death and sister-chromatid separation assays were as previously described .
a number of approaches were used to arrest checkpoint-defective cells early in mitosis. As budding yeast assembles its spindle at the same time as replicating its DNA, we were able to use 10mg/ml hydroxyurea treatment to enrich for mitotic cells. For some experiments a combination of 10mg/ml hydroxyurea and 10 µg/ml nocodazole was used. Alternatively, checkpoint-deficient cells were arrested in metaphase by overexpression of non-degradable securin (GAL-Pds1-Δdb)–data not shown.
Cycloheximide chase assays
Cells were synchronised in G1 through α-factor treatment in YEPRaff media, and GAL-MAD3 was induced through the addition of 2% galactose to the media for 30 minutes. Cells were then washed in YPDA media to turn off the GAL promoter, and cycloheximide added to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml to prevent new protein synthesis. Time points were taken at 15 minute intervals and whole cell extracts immunoblotted with α-Mad3p antibodies. Film was scanned and bands quantitated using ImageQuant software, with dilution series of the zero time point being run as a control.
Cells containing Spc42-mCherry labelled SPBs and GFP-marked chromosome V were presynchronised in G1, and then released into media containing nocodazole (15 µg/ml) for 1 or 3 hours. The nocodazole was then washed out, and cells were arrested in the next G1 with a-factor. Cells were fixed for 5 minutes with 3.7% formaldehyde, washed and then imaged. Chromosome mis-segregation was scored as the % of cells that arrested in the next G1 with 2 GFP spots.
Chromosome bi-orientation assay
Cells containing Spc42-tomato labelled SPBs, GFP-labelled CENIV, and Methionine-repressible CDC20 were pre-synchronised in -Met media with α-factor. They were then washed and re-suspended in YPD supplemented with 8mM methionine and α-factor, and incubated for 2 hours to deplete cells of Cdc20p. The a-factor was then washed out and cells released into YPD (+8mM Methionine) media containing 30 µg/ml nocodazole and 30 µg/ml benomyl. 90 minutes later the nocodazole was washed out. At 15 minute intervals during the ensuing spindle assembly, at 30°C, cells were fixed and scored for bi-polar spindles with 2 paired GFP-spots due to “breathing” of the centromeric DNA . Throughout each time-course 8mM Methionine was added every 30 minutes to ensure continued Cdc20p depletion. Bi-orientation was scored as the % of cells with breathing centromeres on short bi-polar spindles.
We are very grateful to Adèle Marston, Sue Biggins, and Andrew Murray for yeast strains, to Ken Sawin for fluorescent tagging constructs, to the Hardwick Lab and Adèle Marston for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, and to Mark Solomon for communicating results prior to publication.
Conceived and designed the experiments: KH EK. Performed the experiments: KH EK Sv. Analyzed the data: KH EK Sv. Wrote the paper: KH EK.
- 1. Nasmyth K (2002) Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science 297: 559–565.K. Nasmyth2002Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation.Science297559565
- 2. Hassold T, Hunt P (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2: 280–291.T. HassoldP. Hunt2001To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.Nat Rev Genet2280291
- 3. Musacchio A, Hardwick KG (2002) The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 731–741.A. MusacchioKG Hardwick2002The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol3731741
- 4. Cleveland DW, Mao Y, Sullivan KF (2003) Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112: 407–421.DW ClevelandY. MaoKF Sullivan2003Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.Cell112407421
- 5. Taylor SS, Scott MI, Holland AJ (2004) The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Chromosome Res 12: 599–616.SS TaylorMI ScottAJ Holland2004The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation.Chromosome Res12599616
- 6. Peters JM (2006) The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 644–656.JM Peters2006The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol7644656
- 7. Visintin R, Prinz S, Amon A (1997) CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278: 460–463.R. VisintinS. PrinzA. Amon1997CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis.Science278460463
- 8. Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, et al. (1998) Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279: 1041–1044.LH HwangLF LauDL SmithCA MistrotKG Hardwick1998Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint.Science27910411044
- 9. Kim SH, Lin DP, Matsumoto S, Kitazono A, Matsumoto T (1998) Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279: 1045–1047.SH KimDP LinS. MatsumotoA. KitazonoT. Matsumoto1998Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint.Science27910451047
- 10. Prinz S, Hwang ES, Visintin R, Amon A (1998) The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis reveals a role for APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis. Curr Biol 8: 750–760.S. PrinzES HwangR. VisintinA. Amon1998The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis reveals a role for APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis.Curr Biol8750760
- 11. Morris MC, Kaiser P, Rudyak S, Baskerville C, Watson MH, et al. (2003) Cks1-dependent proteasome recruitment and activation of CDC20 transcription in budding yeast. Nature 423: 1009–1013.MC MorrisP. KaiserS. RudyakC. BaskervilleMH Watson2003Cks1-dependent proteasome recruitment and activation of CDC20 transcription in budding yeast.Nature42310091013
- 12. Chung E, Chen RH (2003) Phosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its inhibition by the spindle checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol 5: 748–753.E. ChungRH Chen2003Phosphorylation of Cdc20 is required for its inhibition by the spindle checkpoint.Nat Cell Biol5748753
- 13. Shirayama M, Zachariae W, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K (1998) The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J 17: 1336–1349.M. ShirayamaW. ZachariaeR. CioskK. Nasmyth1998The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Embo J1713361349
- 14. Pan J, Chen RH (2004) Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 18: 1439–1451.J. PanRH Chen2004Spindle checkpoint regulates Cdc20p stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genes Dev1814391451
- 15. Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW (1991) Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature 349: 132–138.M. GlotzerAW MurrayMW Kirschner1991Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway.Nature349132138
- 16. Pfleger CM, Kirschner MW (2000) The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1. Genes Dev 14: 655–665.CM PflegerMW Kirschner2000The KEN box: an APC recognition signal distinct from the D box targeted by Cdh1.Genes Dev14655665
- 17. Schwab M, Neutzner M, Mocker D, Seufert W (2001) Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. Embo J 20: 5165–5175.M. SchwabM. NeutznerD. MockerW. Seufert2001Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC.Embo J2051655175
- 18. Pfleger CM, Lee E, Kirschner MW (2001) Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev 15: 2396–2407.CM PflegerE. LeeMW Kirschner2001Substrate recognition by the Cdc20 and Cdh1 components of the anaphase-promoting complex.Genes Dev1523962407
- 19. Zur A, Brandeis M (2002) Timing of APC/C substrate degradation is determined by fzy/fzr specificity of destruction boxes. Embo J 21: 4500–4510.A. ZurM. Brandeis2002Timing of APC/C substrate degradation is determined by fzy/fzr specificity of destruction boxes.Embo J2145004510
- 20. Yamano H, Gannon J, Mahbubani H, Hunt T (2004) Cell cycle-regulated recognition of the destruction box of cyclin B by the APC/C in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 13: 137–147.H. YamanoJ. GannonH. MahbubaniT. Hunt2004Cell cycle-regulated recognition of the destruction box of cyclin B by the APC/C in Xenopus egg extracts.Mol Cell13137147
- 21. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, et al. (2002) Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. Embo J 21: 2496–2506.L. SironiM. MapelliS. KnappA. De AntoniKT Jeang2002Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a ‘safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint.Embo J2124962506
- 22. Yu H (2006) Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model. J Cell Biol 173: 153–157.H. Yu2006Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model.J Cell Biol173153157
- 23. Howell BJ, Moree B, Farrar EM, Stewart S, Fang G, et al. (2004) Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr Biol 14: 953–964.BJ HowellB. MoreeEM FarrarS. StewartG. Fang2004Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells.Curr Biol14953964
- 24. Shah JV, Botvinick E, Bonday Z, Furnari F, Berns M, et al. (2004) Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing. Curr Biol 14: 942–952.JV ShahE. BotvinickZ. BondayF. FurnariM. Berns2004Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing.Curr Biol14942952
- 25. De Antoni A, Pearson CG, Cimini D, Canman JC, Sala V, et al. (2005) The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 15: 214–225.A. De AntoniCG PearsonD. CiminiJC CanmanV. Sala2005The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint.Curr Biol15214225
- 26. Vink M, Simonetta M, Transidico P, Ferrari K, Mapelli M, et al. (2006) In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics. Curr Biol 16: 755–766.M. VinkM. SimonettaP. TransidicoK. FerrariM. Mapelli2006In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics.Curr Biol16755766
- 27. Nasmyth K (2005) How do so few control so many? Cell 120: 739–746.K. Nasmyth2005How do so few control so many?Cell120739746
- 28. Hardwick KG, Johnston RC, Smith DL, Murray AW (2000) MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J Cell Biol 148: 871–882.KG HardwickRC JohnstonDL SmithAW Murray2000MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p.J Cell Biol148871882
- 29. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001) Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol 154: 925–936.V. SudakinGK ChanTJ Yen2001Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2.J Cell Biol154925936
- 30. Mao Y, Abrieu A, Cleveland DW (2003) Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1. Cell 114: 87–98.Y. MaoA. AbrieuDW Cleveland2003Activating and silencing the mitotic checkpoint through CENP-E-dependent activation/inactivation of BubR1.Cell1148798
- 31. Millband DN, Hardwick KG (2002) Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 22: 2728–2742.DN MillbandKG Hardwick2002Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localizes to kinetochores in a Bub1p-, Bub3p-, and Mph1p-dependent manner.Mol Cell Biol2227282742
- 32. Tang Z, Bharadwaj R, Li B, Yu H (2001) Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev Cell 1: 227–237.Z. TangR. BharadwajB. LiH. Yu2001Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1.Dev Cell1227237
- 33. Fang G (2002) Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Biol Cell 13: 755–766.G. Fang2002Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex.Mol Biol Cell13755766
- 34. Logarinho E, Bousbaa H, Dias JM, Lopes C, Amorim I, et al. (2004) Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells. J Cell Sci 117: 1757–1771.E. LogarinhoH. BousbaaJM DiasC. LopesI. Amorim2004Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores in Drosophila cells.J Cell Sci11717571771
- 35. Cardozo T, Pagano M (2004) The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 739–751.T. CardozoM. Pagano2004The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol5739751
- 36. He X, Asthana S, Sorger PK (2000) Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101: 763–775.X. HeS. AsthanaPK Sorger2000Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.Cell101763775
- 37. Palframan WJ, Meehl JB, Jaspersen SL, Winey M, Murray AW (2006) Anaphase inactivation of the spindle checkpoint. Science 313: 680–684.WJ PalframanJB MeehlSL JaspersenM. WineyAW Murray2006Anaphase inactivation of the spindle checkpoint.Science313680684
- 38. Poddar A, Stukenberg PT, Burke DJ (2005) Two complexes of spindle checkpoint proteins containing Cdc20 and Mad2 assemble during mitosis independently of the kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4: 867–878.A. PoddarPT StukenbergDJ Burke2005Two complexes of spindle checkpoint proteins containing Cdc20 and Mad2 assemble during mitosis independently of the kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryot Cell4867878
- 39. He X, Patterson TE, Sazer S (1997) The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 7965–7970.X. HeTE PattersonS. Sazer1997The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A9479657970
- 40. Camasses A, Bogdanova A, Shevchenko A, Zachariae W (2003) The CCT chaperonin promotes activation of the anaphase-promoting complex through the generation of functional Cdc20. Mol Cell 12: 87–100.A. CamassesA. BogdanovaA. ShevchenkoW. Zachariae2003The CCT chaperonin promotes activation of the anaphase-promoting complex through the generation of functional Cdc20.Mol Cell1287100
- 41. Morrow CJ, Tighe A, Johnson VL, Scott MI, Ditchfield C, et al. (2005) Bub1 and aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20. J Cell Sci 118: 3639–3652.CJ MorrowA. TigheVL JohnsonMI ScottC. Ditchfield2005Bub1 and aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20.J Cell Sci11836393652
- 42. Davenport J, Harris LD, Goorha R (2006) Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1. Exp Cell Res 312: 1831–1842.J. DavenportLD HarrisR. Goorha2006Spindle checkpoint function requires Mad2-dependent Cdc20 binding to the Mad3 homology domain of BubR1.Exp Cell Res31218311842
- 43. Miller JJ, Summers MK, Hansen DV, Nachury MV, Lehman NL, et al. (2006) Emi1 stably binds and inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor. Genes Dev 20: 2410–2420.JJ MillerMK SummersDV HansenMV NachuryNL Lehman2006Emi1 stably binds and inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor.Genes Dev2024102420
- 44. Lampson MA, Kapoor TM (2005) The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments. Nat Cell Biol 7: 93–98.MA LampsonTM Kapoor2005The human mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1 regulates chromosome-spindle attachments.Nat Cell Biol79398
- 45. Wang Q, Liu T, Fang Y, Xie S, Huang X, et al. (2004) BUBR1 deficiency results in abnormal megakaryopoiesis. Blood 103: 1278–1285.Q. WangT. LiuY. FangS. XieX. Huang2004BUBR1 deficiency results in abnormal megakaryopoiesis.Blood10312781285
- 46. Hanks S, Coleman K, Reid S, Plaja A, Firth H, et al. (2004) Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat Genet 36: 1159–1161.S. HanksK. ColemanS. ReidA. PlajaH. Firth2004Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B.Nat Genet3611591161
- 47. Sotillo R, Hernando E, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Teruya-Feldstein J, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. (2006) Mad2 Overexpression Promotes Aneuploidy and Tumorigenesis in Mice. Cancer Cell 11: 9–23.R. SotilloE. HernandoE. Diaz-RodriguezJ. Teruya-FeldsteinC. Cordon-Cardo2006Mad2 Overexpression Promotes Aneuploidy and Tumorigenesis in Mice.Cancer Cell11923
- 48. Larsen NA, Harrison SC (2004) Crystal structure of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3. J Mol Biol 344: 885–892.NA LarsenSC Harrison2004Crystal structure of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub3.J Mol Biol344885892
- 49. Wilson DK, Cerna D, Chew E (2005) The 1.1-angstrom structure of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub3p reveals functional regions. J Biol Chem 280: 13944–13951.DK WilsonD. CernaE. Chew2005The 1.1-angstrom structure of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub3p reveals functional regions.J Biol Chem2801394413951
- 50. Bolanos-Garcia VM, Beaufils S, Renault A, Grossmann JG, Brewerton S, et al. (2005) The conserved N-terminal region of the mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1: a putative TPR motif of high surface activity. Biophys J 89: 2640–2649.VM Bolanos-GarciaS. BeaufilsA. RenaultJG GrossmannS. Brewerton2005The conserved N-terminal region of the mitotic checkpoint protein BUBR1: a putative TPR motif of high surface activity.Biophys J8926402649
- 51. Larsen NA, Al-Bassam J, Wei RR, Harrison SC (2007) Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 1201–1206.NA LarsenJ. Al-BassamRR WeiSC Harrison2007Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A10412011206
- 52. Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P (1990) Methods in Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press. MD RoseF. WinstonP. Hieter1990Methods in Yeast Genetics.Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press
- 53. Sambrook J, MacCallum P, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press. J. SambrookP. MacCallumD. Russell2001Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press
- 54. Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BN, Palmer AE, et al. (2004) Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1567–1572.NC ShanerRE CampbellPA SteinbachBN GiepmansAE Palmer2004Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein.Nat Biotechnol2215671572
- 55. Snaith HA, Samejima I, Sawin KE (2005) Multistep and multimode cortical anchoring of tea1p at cell tips in fission yeast. Embo J 24: 3690–3699.HA SnaithI. SamejimaKE Sawin2005Multistep and multimode cortical anchoring of tea1p at cell tips in fission yeast.Embo J2436903699
- 56. Hardwick KG, Murray AW (1995) Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 131: 709–720.KG HardwickAW Murray1995Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.J Cell Biol131709720
- 57. Minshull J, Straight A, Rudner AD, Dernburg AF, Belmont A, et al. (1996) Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Curr Biol 6: 1609–1620.J. MinshullA. StraightAD RudnerAF DernburgA. Belmont1996Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast.Curr Biol616091620