Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Characterization of Fusobacterium varium Fv113-g1 isolated from a patient with ulcerative colitis based on complete genome sequence and transcriptome analysis

  • Tsuyoshi Sekizuka,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Laboratory of Bacterial Genomics, Pathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan

  • Yumiko Ogasawara,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Laboratory of Bacterial Genomics, Pathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan

  • Toshifumi Ohkusa,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration

    Affiliation Department of Microbiota Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

  • Makoto Kuroda

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    makokuro@niid.go.jp

    Affiliation Laboratory of Bacterial Genomics, Pathogen Genomics Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan

    ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0487-4405

Characterization of Fusobacterium varium Fv113-g1 isolated from a patient with ulcerative colitis based on complete genome sequence and transcriptome analysis

  • Tsuyoshi Sekizuka, 
  • Yumiko Ogasawara, 
  • Toshifumi Ohkusa, 
  • Makoto Kuroda
PLOS
x

Abstract

Fusobacterium spp. present in the oral and gut flora is carcinogenic and is associated with the risk of pancreatic and colorectal cancers. Fusobacterium spp. is also implicated in a broad spectrum of human pathologies, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). Here we report the complete genome sequence of Fusobacterium varium Fv113-g1 (genome size, 3.96 Mb) isolated from a patient with UC. Comparative genome analyses totally suggested that Fv113-g1 is basically assigned as F. varium, in particular, it could be reclassified as notable F. varium subsp. similar to F. ulcerans because of partial shared orthologs. Compared with the genome sequences of F. varium ATCC 27725 (genome size, 3.30 Mb) and other strains of Fusobacterium spp., Fv113-g1 possesses many accessary pan-genome sequences with noteworthy multiple virulence factors, including 44 autotransporters (type V secretion system, T5SS) and 13 Fusobacterium adhesion (FadA) paralogs involved in potential mucosal inflammation. Indeed, transcriptome analysis demonstrated that Fv113-g1-specific accessary genes, such as multiple T5SS and fadA paralogs, showed notably increased expression with D-MEM cultivation than with brain heart infusion broth. This implied that growth condition may enhance the expression of such potential virulence factors, leading to remarkable survival against other gut microorganisms and to the pathogenicity to human intestinal epithelium.

Introduction

Fusobacteria are anaerobic gram-negative rods that rarely cause clinically significant and serious infections in humans [1]. Two Fusobacterium spp. F. nucleatum and F. necrophorum are the most commonly isolated pathogens within this genus. F. nucleatum is an anaerobic oral commensal that acts as an agent in gingival infection and is a periodontal pathogen [2]. Periodontal disease and dental procedures are frequently identified as the source of invasive F. nucleatum infection, which is implicated in oral infections, adverse pregnancy outcomes, GI disorders, and various other human diseases. Similarly, chemotherapy-induced oropharyngeal mucositis [3] and inflammatory bowel disease [4] have been implicated in invasive F. nucleatum infection. F. necrophorum is one of the causal agents for Lemierre’s syndrome [5,6], which is characterized by sepsis that often evolves after a sore throat or tonsillitis and complicated with various septic emboli and thrombosis of the internal jugular vein [7]. In addition, F. necrophorum is also associated with peritonsillar abscess formation and otitis media in small children [8]. Bacteremia due to other Fusobacterium spp. is uncommon and is associated with a variety of clinical presentations [9].

In addition, Fusobacterium spp. in the oral cavity are carcinogenic and are considered as a risk factor for pancreatic and colorectal cancers [10]. They have recently been implicated in a broad spectrum of human pathologies, including Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis (UC), preterm birth, and colorectal cancer [11]. Some Fusobacterium spp. are capable of actively invading host cells without the aid of other factors; the active invader species F. nucleatum and F. periodonticum can independently invade host cells in part using extracellular adhesin and invasion molecules, such as Fusobacterium adhesion (FadA) [12,13]. Other Fusobacterium spp. are passive invaders, including F. necrophorum, a veterinary pathogen and causative agent for necrosis; and F. ulcerans, which is related to tropical skin ulcers. F. mortiferum and F. varium are frequent residents of the human gut [14]; some experimental data suggest that F. varium can actively invade host epithelial cells [14].

In this study, we analyzed the whole-genome sequence of F. varium Fv113-g1 isolated from a patient with UC. Furthermore, a comparative analysis suggested that Fv113-g1 possesses many redundant paralogs of Fusobacterium virulence factors, including autotransporters (type V secretion system, T5SS), FadA, and hemaggulutinin.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The study protocol was approved by the institutional medical ethics committee of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Japan (Approval No. 479 and 642) and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. Before molecular diagnosis for etiological pathogens, a written informed consent was obtained from the patient to isolate potential etiological agents.

Bacterial strain

F. varium Fv113-g1 was isolated from the colon mucus membrane of a patient with UC [15]. Briefly, the mucus biopsy specimens were first incubated with imipenem (50 μg/ml saline) for 1 hour at 37° C to inactivate extracellular bacteria organisms, and then serially diluted samples were spread on agar plates for anaerobic culture to isolate intracellular bacteria in colon mucus epithelium. Isolated bacteria were examined by the disk diffusion test for imipenem susceptibility (minimal inhibitory concentration less than 4 μg/ml). Fv113-g1 was cultivated in modified GAM broth (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) or on FM agar (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA) under anaerobic conditions at 37°C.

On the basis of the ATCC product sheets, no sufficient information of pathogenicity for ATCC 8501 and 27725 have been stated; in addition, those isolates are categorized as biosafety level 1, suggesting that those are commensal bacteria as one of human gut flora.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) plug was prepared using the CHEF Bacterial Genomic DNA Plug Kit (BioRad, CA, USA), replacing lysozyme with achromopeptidase (Wako, Osaka, Japan) for bacterial lysis. The plug was treated with a restriction enzyme or S1 nuclease, followed by PFGE (1% agarose gel; 0.5× TBE; 6 V/cm; pulse-time, 2.2–65.0; angle, 120°; run time, 20 h) [16].

Whole-genome sequence analysis

Detail experimental procedures for hybrid assembly using illumina short reads, PacBio long reads and Argus optical mapping were illustrated in S1 Fig. Genomic DNA of F. varium Fv113-g1 was purified as follows: bacterial cells were lysed with achromopeptidase (Wako), followed by phenol–chloroform extraction and further purification using the Qiagen DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Germany). Short insert size (approximately 1.4 kb) for paired-end and long insert sizes (3–4 kb, 5–7 kb, and 8–10 kb) for mate-pair library were constructed using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and Nextera Mate-Pair Sample Prep kit (Illumina), respectively. Whole-genome sequencing of Fv113-g1 was performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform with 300-cycle MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 for the paired-end library and 600-cycle MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 for the mate-pair libraries. The short reads were assembled using Platanus v1.0.1 [17] and A5-Miseq de novo assembler [18]. The complete genome sequence of this strain was determined using the PacBio RSII sequencer for long-read sequencing method (DNA/Polymerase Binding Kit P5; DNA Template Prep Kit 3.0; insert size, approximately 20 kb). Sequencing data were produced with more than 30-fold coverage and assembled using the assembly program SMRT 2.3.0_HGAP3 [19]. Argus optical mapping with NcoI of Fv113-g1 genome DNA was performed using the Argus system (OpGen, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and previous report by Hasegawa et al. [20]. Error correction of tentative complete circular sequences was performed using iCORN2 in PAGIT version 1.64 [21] with Illumina short reads. Annotation was performed in Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology 2.0 (RAST) [22], InterPro v49.0 [23], and NCBI-BLASTp/BLASTx.

Comparative genome sequence analysis

The draft-genome sequencing of F. varium type strain ATCC 8501T was performed as described in the abovementioned section, followed by de novo assembly using A5-Miseq de novo assembler [18]. Comparative genome analysis was performed with TBLASTx search (≥90% amino acid identity) using open reading frames (ORFs) of Fv113-g1 as queries against draft-genome sequences of strains ATCC 8501T and ATCC 27725, ATCC 49185 and 12-1B, respectively (S1 Table), followed by visualizing the search results with GView server (https://server.gview.ca/) [24].

Phylogeny was generated using the maximum-likelihood phylogenetic method with FastTree v2.1.10 [25].

Orthology analysis was performed using OrthoVenn that is a web platform for comparison and annotation of orthologous gene clusters among multiple species (threshold: <e-10) [26].

RNA-seq analysis

Bacterial cells were suspended in 10 mM Tris-10 mM EDTA (TE10 buffer), 1% Sodium dodecyl sulfate, and phenol–chloroform and then subjected to extraction. The upper phase of the extraction was subjected to RNA purification using the RecoverAllTM Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-seq libraries were prepared from approximately 30 ng of total RNA using the ScriptSeqTM v2 RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA-seq libraries were sequenced as single-end 151-mers on a MiSeq sequencer using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 (Illumina). The transcriptome analysis was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench 7.5 software (Qiagen K.K.). Significant gene expression was determined using a false discovery rate-normalized P value of <0.05. All RNA-seq raw data are available in S2 Table.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The whole-genome sequence and annotation are available in GenBank: FV113-g1-chromosome (AP017968), pFV113-g1-1 (AP017969), pFV113-g1-2 (AP017970); BioProject PRJDB5491. The short-read sequences for DNA-Seq and RNA-Seq have been deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ; accession numbers: DRA005489 and DRA005507). In addition, draft-genome sequence of reference type strain ATCC 8501T has been also deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ; accession numbers: DRA006297).

Results and discussion

Complete genome sequencing of F. Varium FV113-g1

First, the draft-genome sequencing of F. varium Fv113-g1 was obtained with paired-end and mate-pair short-read libraries. The total number of assembled scaffolds was 3417, with a total scaffold length of approximately 4.4 Mb. N50 and the longest scaffold were approximately 242 kb and 858 kb in length, respectively. The draft-genome sequence constituted many gaps (regions of Ns) in assembly scaffolds; therefore, the short-read assembly only was not efficient to determine the complete genome sequence of Fv113-g1. To complete the genome sequences, PacBio long-read sequencing was performed, resulting in five unitigs (total, 4.14 Mb; N50, 3 Mb). To fill the remaining gaps in these five unitigs, optical mapping of the whole genome digested with NcoI restriction enzyme was performed, followed by gap filling and circularization with nucleotide alignment and error correction with iCORN.

The complete genome sequence suggested that Fv113-g1 possesses one chromosome and two plasmids (pFV113-g1-1 and pFv113-g1-2) as shown in Fig 1. These chromosome and plasmid sequences were verified by PFGE using the restriction enzyme AscI (data not shown) and S1 nuclease-treated DNA (Fig 2). Moreover, putative two plasmid bands were extracted from the PFGE gel, followed by sequencing with Illumina MiSeq, assembling with A5-Miseq, resulting in complete plasmid sequences. Two complete plasmid sequences were also finished by circularization and error correction as described above.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Basic genome information of F. varium Fv113-g1.

Circular representation of the Fv113-g1 genome (chromosome and two plasmids) along with comparative genome information of other F. varium strains (S1 Table). Fv113-g1 genomic information is shown. From inward, slots 1–4 (slot 1, GC skew; slot 2, GC content; slot 3, open reading frames; slot 4, RNAs), slots 5–8 (comparative genome analysis of ATCC 8501T, ATCC 27725, ATCC 49185 and 12-1B, respectively, with ≥90% aa identity), slot 9 (prophage), and slots 10–11 (possible virulence factors: autotransporter, FadA protein, and hemagglutinin).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Two plasmids in Fv113-g1.

Plasmids were identified by separation on Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis using S1 nuclease-treated genomic DNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.g002

The final Fv113-g1 genome information is shown in Table 1. The chromosomal DNA was 3.96 Mb long, encoding 58 tRNA genes, seven rRNA operons, 3,552 predicted coding sequences, and seven pseudogenes (Table 1). The GC content of the chromosomal DNA was 29.2%, whereas that of plasmids was 26.7% and 27.7%, respectively, indicating relatively low GC content (Table 1).

Insertion sequence (IS) in F. varium Fv113-g1

Multiple copies of two ISs designated as ISFv1 (1.44 kb) and ISFv2 (1.78 kb) were identified as 47 and 48 insertions in the chromosome, respectively (blue and green bar in the most outer circle in Fig 1). The coding sequence of ISFv1 was relatively similar to that of IS91 family and orthologs of F. varium/necrophorum strains, but with very low similarity of up to 85%. However, it was similar to the IS91 family in Leptotrichia goodfellowii or Streptobacillus moniliformis, which are members of the family Leptotrichiaceae, suggesting that these ISFv1 orthologs might have possibly disseminated with horizontal gene transfer between Fusobacteriaceae and Leptotrichiaceae. On the contrary, the coding sequence of ISFv2 showed high similarity to IS5/1182 family and widely identified orthologs of F. nucleatum strains, suggesting that ISFv2 could be a general orthologous IS among Fusobacterium spp.

Comparative genomics among F. varium genome sequences

To characterize the Fv113-g1-specific genetic features, we additionally sequenced the draft-genome sequence of F. varium ATCC 8501T (total, 3.3 Mb) as one of the reference genomes, followed by comparative genome analysis of F. varium ATCC 8501 T and publicly available draft-genome sequence of ATCC 27725 (3.3 Mb; NZ_ACIE00000000.2). ATCC 8501T and ATCC 27725 are categorized as biosafety level 1, suggesting that those are commensal bacteria as one of human gut flora. The chromosomal DNA of Fv113-g1 was larger by approximately 0.66 Mb than that of ATCC 8501T and ATCC 27725 (S1 Table).

Phylogenetic analysis using 16S-rRNA among 18 Fusobacterium species (S1 Table) indicated that Fv113-g1 appears to be basically classified as F. varium (Fig 3A), whereas further phylogenetic analysis for the rpoB gene displayed the relatively discriminated phylogeny between those two (Fig 3B). In addition, orthology analysis indicated that 65.5% [2,198 / (2,853 all clusters + 503 singletons) in Fv113-g1] of gene clusters are identified as core clusters among F. varium related strains, whereas 343 orthologous gene clusters between Fv113-g1 and F. ulcerans ATCC 49185 found to be more than 251 clusters between Fv113-g1 and F. varium ATCC 27725 (Fig 3C and S2 Table). Orthologous analysis also suggested that Fv113-g1 appears to possess both genetic features of F. varium and F. ulcerans. Indeed, pan-genome analysis suggested that Fv113-g1 possesses notable Fv113-g1-specific genetic features as follows: redundant T5SS (red bar in Fig 1); FadA paralogs (blue bar in Fig 1); two large, filamentous hemagglutinin adhesions (yellow bar in Fig 1; FV113-G1_31500, 3,125 aa; FV113-G1_31550, 5,066 aa); multiple ISs, and three potential prophages (gray bar in Fig 1) located on the chromosome. Abovementioned comparative genome analyses totally suggested that Fv113-g1 should be basically assigned as F. varium, in particular, it could be reclassified as notable F. varium subsp. similar to F. ulcerans because of partial shared orthologs.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic and orthology analysis among Fv113-g1 related Fusobacterium spp.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis with 1000× bootstrapping was performed for A) 16S-rRNA (1,370 nt) and B) RNA polymerase β-subunit gene rpoB among Fusobacterium spp. listed in S1 Table. C) Venn-diagram of orthology analysis among indicated three strains (threshold: <e-10). OrthoVenn website generated gene clusters as ortholog in every strain, for instance, all predicted proteins in Fv113-g1 (3686 proteins) were discriminated into 2853 clusters, whereas the remaining proteins (503 proteins) were singletons showing no orthologous proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.g003

Autotransporters T5SS in F. varium Fv113-g1

Fv113-g1 possesses the multiple T5SS, which have been characterized as autotransporters. Also, 39 T5SSs, including two pseudogenes, were located on the chromosome and four and one in plasmids pFV113-g1-1 and pFv113-g1-2, respectively (Fig 1). T5SS was first characterized for IgA1 protease [27]; the presumed integral transmembrane β-barrel domain (IPR005546) at the C-terminus mediates its secretion through the outer membrane to transport the protein itself (Fig 4). The N-terminus contains the variable passenger domain, resulting in autocatalytic cleavage in some proteins, whereas a different protease is used in other proteins. However, no cleavage occurs in some cases [28]. Some N-terminus domains showed typical parallel β-helix repeats (InterPro ID: IPR00626), which hindered the gap closing during de novo assembly of the whole-genome sequence (Fig 4). Two possible serine proteases FV113-G1_20980 and FV113-G1_32850 and one possible metallopeptidase FV113-G1_03640 were predicted by InterPro motif search, but most others showed unknown function, suggesting that such multiple T5SSs have not been well characterized for the potential virulence of Fv113-g1. However, Fv113-g1 carries the most redundant T5SS compared with other Fusobacterium spp. and bacteria (Table 2), which also implies that Fv113-g1 has a high potential of surviving in hostile environments as a virulent strain.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Autotransporters as type V secretion system (T5SS) in F. varium Fv113-g1.

A total of 39 T5SSs, including two pseudogenes, are located on the chromosome and four and one in plasmids pFV113-G1-1 and pFv113-g1-g1-2, respectively. T5SS possesses the presumed integral transmembrane β-barrel domain (IPR005546) at the C-terminus, which mediates its secretion through the outer membrane to transport the protein itself. Comparative transcriptome analysis was performed using RNA-seq under different media (GAM broth or D-MEM) and growth phase conditions (see differential expression of all ORFs in S2 Table). The expressions of two T5SSs (FV113-G1_15670 and FV113-G1_32990) were found to be significantly increased in D-MEM, and six T5SSs showed relatively high expressions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.g004

thumbnail
Table 2. Predicted number of autotransporters and FadA adhesions in the whole-genome sequence of Fusobacterium spp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.t002

FadA paralogs in F. varium Fv113-g1

Some Fusobacterium spp. are capable of actively invading host cells using extracellular adhesin and invasion molecules, such as FadA [12,13]. Analysis of FadA homologs among Fusobacterium spp. suggested that most species carry an average of four FadA homologs, whereas F. varium Fv113-g1 carries 13 (Fig 1 and Table 2), implying that significantly redundant FadA paralogs could contribute to severe mucosal inflammation, which might lead to UC. In fact, it has been reported that F. nucleatum FadA binds to E-cadherin, thus activating β-catenin signaling and differentially regulating inflammatory and oncogenic responses [29]. Moreover, in xenografts, FadA treatment alone stimulates the inflammatory responses, indicating that FadA is a major stimulant of inflammation.

Intriguingly, the paralogs of potential invasion molecule FadA and T5SS are closely located (Fig 5), implying that FadA-related pathogenicity of Fv113-g1 may be coordinately associated with multiple T5SS.

thumbnail
Fig 5. FadA paralogs adjacent to T5SS.

Potential invasion molecule FadA is closely located to T5SS, possibly associated with Fv113-g1 pathogenicity. ORF color is also illustrated in Fig 1 (red, T5SS; black, pseudo T5SS; blue, FadA paralogs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.g005

Filamentous hemagglutinin in F. varium Fv113-g1

Two large potential adhesions (FV113-G1_31500, 3,125 aa, 328 kDa; FV113-G1_31550, 5,066 aa, 563 kDa) were found as Fv113-g1-specific surface proteins, which showed similarity to a protein motif corresponding to N-terminal filamentous hemagglutinin (InterPro ID: IPR008638). Blastp homology search suggested that there are no orthologous proteins for these adhesions and showed more than 30% aa similarity to hemagglutinin in F. necrophorum strains. A number of filamentous hemagglutinins, including many proteins of more than 2500 amino acids, represent a carbohydrate-dependent hemagglutination activity domain found near the N-terminus [30].

Comparative transcriptome analysis between BHI and D-MEM

We speculated that cell culture medium D-MEM could reproduce in vivo conditions to some extent for the bacteria instead of a nutrient-rich broth, such as BHI. To identify potential virulence-related factors showing increased gene expression in D-MEM, we performed comparative transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq under different media and growth phase conditions. In total, 107 ORFs were identified (S3 Table); the expression of putative transport systems, mainly iron and other cations of the ABC transporter, was significantly increased, suggesting that a difference in the culture medium apparently affects the acquisition of ferrous ions. In addition, the expression of ferric enterobactin receptors was increased. Such differential expression could be because of limited nutrient supply by D-MEM because metal acquisition is vital for bacteria growing in metal-scarce environments, such as inside a host in the presence of pathogens.

The most significant high expression was found in flavodoxin FldA ortholog (FV113-G1_04600). Flavodoxin is a small redox-active protein with a flavin mononucleotide prosthetic group. It functions as an electron transfer agent in a variety of microbial metabolic processes, including nitrogen fixation by nitrogenase [31] and sulphite reduction [32]. A putative alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (FV113-G1_28520), a peroxiredoxin belonging to a family of ubiquitous proteins that are important for defense against antioxidants, was highly overexpressed in D-MEM culture [33]. These findings suggested that a medium shift may affect the metabolic pathway underlying the oxidative stress generated by D-MEM-dependent energy production. Flavodoxin and peroxiredoxin are potential virulence-related factors, because they contribute to protect the bacterial cell from oxidative stress in the phagolysosome of the macrophage to thrive in hostile environments [34]; such antioxidants have been shown to be essential in several other bacteria (http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/deg/) [35]. In addition, flavodoxin is an essential factor for the survival of some human pathogens, and the fact that flavodoxin is not present in humans strongly suggests the possibility of drug development of novel and specific antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant bacteria [36].

The expression of two T5SSs (FV113-G1_15670 and FV113-G1_32990) significantly increased in D-MEM, and six T5SSs showed relatively higher expressions (Fig 4). As described above, the specific features of T5SS have not been well characterized, but medium-dependent expression may contribute to Fv113-g1 survival as well as the abovementioned flavodoxin-related metabolism.

Of the 13 FadA homologs (Table 2), two (FV113-G1_15700 and 32960) showed more than 40-fold and more than 10-fold increased expression in D-MEM, respectively; these ORFs were closely located to the two T5SSs discussed above, suggesting that FadA and T5SS are coordinately modulated to adapt to the environmental change. One homolog (FV113-G1_19130) showed 15-fold reduced expression (S2 Table), whereas two other homologs (FV113-G1_14340 and _14350) showed highly constitutive expression. RNA-seq experiment suggested that these redundant FadA homolog genes are differentially regulated to support the well-growing bacteria under variable conditions.

Conclusions

We determined the complete genome sequence of F. varium Fv113-g1 isolated from a patient with UC. Comparative genome analysis revealed that Fv113-g1 possesses noteworthy gene repertories, including the most redundant T5SS and FadA adhesins, in both the chromosome and plasmids. The genome size of Fv113-g1 is apparently larger than that of ATCC-type strains, and transcriptome analysis suggested that Fv113-g1-specific accessary genes, such as multiple T5SS, could potentially contribute to survival against other human gut microbiota and to the pathogenicity to human intestinal epithelium.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Experimental procedures for complete genome sequence of Fv113-g1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.s001

(PDF)

S1 Table. List of Fusobacterium spp. for comparative genome analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.s002

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Orthology and RNA-seq results of F. varium Fv113-g1 with differential media and growth phase conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.s003

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Potential virulence-related factors showing increased gene expression in D-MEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189319.s004

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan (H25-Nanchi-Ippan-031), and the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (grant numbers: 16fk0108119j0001 and 17fk0108219j0002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Huggan PJ, Murdoch DR. Fusobacterial infections: clinical spectrum and incidence of invasive disease. J Infect. 2008;57(4):283–9. pmid:18805588.
  2. 2. Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum: a commensal-turned pathogen. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;23:141–7. pmid:25576662; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4323942.
  3. 3. Candoni A, Fili C, Trevisan R, Silvestri F, Fanin R. Fusobacterium nucleatum: a rare cause of bacteremia in neutropenic patients with leukemia and lymphoma. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(11):1112–5. pmid:14616727.
  4. 4. Margalit M, Elinav H, Ilan Y, Shalit M. Liver abscess in inflammatory bowel disease: report of two cases and review of the literature. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19(12):1338–42. pmid:15610305.
  5. 5. Vogel LC, Boyer KM. Metastatic complications of Fusobacterium necrophorum sepsis. Two cases of Lemierre's postanginal septicemia. Am J Dis Child. 1980;134(4):356–8. pmid:7369198.
  6. 6. Shannon GW, Ellis CV, Stepp WP. Oropharyngeal bacteroides melaninogenicus infection with septicemia: Lemierre's syndrome. J Fam Pract. 1983;16(1):159–60, 63, 66. pmid:6129280.
  7. 7. Johannesen KM, Bodtger U. Lemierre's syndrome: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. Infect Drug Resist. 2016;9:221–7. pmid:27695351; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5028102.
  8. 8. Holm K, Bank S, Nielsen H, Kristensen LH, Prag J, Jensen A. The role of Fusobacterium necrophorum in pharyngotonsillitis—A review. Anaerobe. 2016;42:89–97. pmid:27693542.
  9. 9. Afra K, Laupland K, Leal J, Lloyd T, Gregson D. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Fusobacterium species bacteremia. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:264. pmid:23734900; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3679863.
  10. 10. Gholizadeh P, Eslami H, Kafil HS. Carcinogenesis mechanisms of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:918–25. pmid:28292019.
  11. 11. Manson McGuire A, Cochrane K, Griggs AD, Haas BJ, Abeel T, Zeng Q, et al. Evolution of invasion in a diverse set of Fusobacterium species. MBio. 2014;5(6):e01864. pmid:25370491; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4222103.
  12. 12. Xu M, Yamada M, Li M, Liu H, Chen SG, Han YW. FadA from Fusobacterium nucleatum utilizes both secreted and nonsecreted forms for functional oligomerization for attachment and invasion of host cells. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(34):25000–9. pmid:17588948.
  13. 13. Ikegami A, Chung P, Han YW. Complementation of the fadA mutation in Fusobacterium nucleatum demonstrates that the surface-exposed adhesin promotes cellular invasion and placental colonization. Infect Immun. 2009;77(7):3075–9. pmid:19398541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2708594.
  14. 14. Ohkusa T, Yoshida T, Sato N, Watanabe S, Tajiri H, Okayasu I. Commensal bacteria can enter colonic epithelial cells and induce proinflammatory cytokine secretion: a possible pathogenic mechanism of ulcerative colitis. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(Pt 5):535–45. pmid:19369513; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2887547.
  15. 15. Ohkusa T, Sato N, Ogihara T, Morita K, Ogawa M, Okayasu I. Fusobacterium varium localized in the colonic mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis stimulates species-specific antibody. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17(8):849–53. pmid:12164960.
  16. 16. Akiba M, Sekizuka T, Yamashita A, Kuroda M, Fujii Y, Murata M, et al. Distribution and Relationships of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants among Extended-Spectrum-Cephalosporin-Resistant or Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from Rivers and Sewage Treatment Plants in India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):2972–80. pmid:26953207; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4862527.
  17. 17. Kajitani R, Toshimoto K, Noguchi H, Toyoda A, Ogura Y, Okuno M, et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res. 2014;24(8):1384–95. pmid:24755901; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4120091.
  18. 18. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(4):587–9. pmid:25338718.
  19. 19. Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2013;10(6):563–9. pmid:23644548.
  20. 20. Hasegawa N, Sekizuka T, Sugi Y, Kawakami N, Ogasawara Y, Kato K, et al. Characterization of the Pathogenicity of Streptococcus intermedius TYG1620 Isolated from a Human Brain Abscess Based on the Complete Genome Sequence with Transcriptome Analysis and Transposon Mutagenesis in a Murine Subcutaneous Abscess Model. Infect Immun. 2017;85(2). pmid:27895128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5278170.
  21. 21. Otto TD, Sanders M, Berriman M, Newbold C. Iterative Correction of Reference Nucleotides (iCORN) using second generation sequencing technology. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(14):1704–7. pmid:20562415; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2894513.
  22. 22. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(Database issue):D206–14. pmid:24293654; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3965101.
  23. 23. Mitchell A, Chang HY, Daugherty L, Fraser M, Hunter S, Lopez R, et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic acids research. 2015;43(Database issue):D213–21. pmid:25428371.
  24. 24. Petkau A, Stuart-Edwards M, Stothard P, Van Domselaar G. Interactive microbial genome visualization with GView. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(24):3125–6. pmid:20956244; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2995121.
  25. 25. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9490. pmid:20224823; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2835736.
  26. 26. Wang Y, Coleman-Derr D, Chen G, Gu YQ. OrthoVenn: a web server for genome wide comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic acids research. 2015;43(W1):W78–84. pmid:25964301; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4489293.
  27. 27. Pohlner J, Halter R, Beyreuther K, Meyer TF. Gene structure and extracellular secretion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae IgA protease. Nature. 1987;325(6103):458–62. pmid:3027577.
  28. 28. Henderson IR, Navarro-Garcia F, Nataro JP. The great escape: structure and function of the autotransporter proteins. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6(9):370–8. pmid:9778731.
  29. 29. Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, Han YW. Fusobacterium nucleatum promotes colorectal carcinogenesis by modulating E-cadherin/beta-catenin signaling via its FadA adhesin. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14(2):195–206. pmid:23954158; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3770529.
  30. 30. Kajava AV, Cheng N, Cleaver R, Kessel M, Simon MN, Willery E, et al. Beta-helix model for the filamentous haemagglutinin adhesin of Bordetella pertussis and related bacterial secretory proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2001;42(2):279–92. pmid:11703654.
  31. 31. Yakunin AF, Gennaro G, Hallenbeck PC. Purification and properties of a nif-specific flavodoxin from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(21):6775–80. pmid:8226618; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC206800.
  32. 32. Gruez A, Pignol D, Zeghouf M, Coves J, Fontecave M, Ferrer JL, et al. Four crystal structures of the 60 kDa flavoprotein monomer of the sulfite reductase indicate a disordered flavodoxin-like module. J Mol Biol. 2000;299(1):199–212. pmid:10860732.
  33. 33. Hall A, Nelson K, Poole LB, Karplus PA. Structure-based insights into the catalytic power and conformational dexterity of peroxiredoxins. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15(3):795–815. pmid:20969484; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3125576.
  34. 34. Moyano AJ, Tobares RA, Rizzi YS, Krapp AR, Mondotte JA, Bocco JL, et al. A long-chain flavodoxin protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa from oxidative stress and host bacterial clearance. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(2):e1004163. pmid:24550745; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3923664.
  35. 35. Zhang R, Lin Y. DEG 5.0, a database of essential genes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37(Database issue):D455–8. pmid:18974178; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2686491.
  36. 36. Rodriguez-Cardenas A, Rojas AL, Conde-Gimenez M, Velazquez-Campoy A, Hurtado-Guerrero R, Sancho J. Streptococcus pneumoniae TIGR4 Flavodoxin: Structural and Biophysical Characterization of a Novel Drug Target. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0161020. pmid:27649488; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5029806.