Figures
Abstract
Background
Acinetobacter baumannii is known for its ability to develop resistance to the major groups of antibiotics, form biofilms, and survive for long periods in hospital environments. The prevalence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii is a significant problem for the modern health care system, and application of lytic bacteriophages for controlling this pathogen may become a solution.
Methodology/Principal Findings
In this study, using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and microbiological assessment we have investigated A. baumannii bacteriophage AP22, which has been recently described. AFM has revealed the morphology of bacteriophage AP22, adsorbed on the surfaces of mica, graphite and host bacterial cells. Besides, morphological changes of bacteriophage AP22-infected A. baumannii cells were characterized at different stages of the lytic cycle, from phage adsorption to the cell lysis. The phage latent period, estimated from AFM was in good agreement with that obtained by microbiological methods (40 min). Bacteriophage AP22, whose head diameter is 62±1 nm and tail length is 88±9 nm, was shown to disperse A. baumannii aggregates and adsorb to the bacterial surface right from the first minute of their mutual incubation at 37°C.
Conclusions/Significance
High rate of bacteriophage AP22 specific adsorption and its ability to disperse bacterial aggregates make this phage very promising for biomedical antimicrobial applications. Complementing microbiological results with AFM data, we demonstrate an effective approach, which allows not only comparing independently obtained characteristics of the lytic cycle but also visualizing the infection process.
Citation: Dubrovin EV, Popova AV, Kraevskiy SV, Ignatov SG, Ignatyuk TE, Yaminsky IV, et al. (2012) Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of the Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteriophage AP22 Lytic Cycle. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047348
Editor: Stefan Bereswill, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany
Received: April 18, 2012; Accepted: September 11, 2012; Published: October 11, 2012
Copyright: © Dubrovin et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: ED has the scholarship of Moscow State University for young scientists. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Acinetobacter baumannii is a nosocomial pathogen, which is often associated with hospital-acquired infections such as pneumonia, wound and urinary tract infections, post-surgery complications and bloodstream infections, especially in severely ill and immunocompromised patients of intensive care and burn units [1], [2]. The microorganism is characterized by its widespread resistance to the major groups of antibiotics, as well as to disinfectants and detergents and was shown to spread and survive in health care environments and on medical devices [3]–[5]. This remarkable resistance to bactericidal factors could be associated with the formation of A. baumannii biofilm on various biotic and abiotic surfaces. Thus, eradicating A. baumannii from hospital settings remains currently a challenging task.
Because of the lack of effective therapeutic agents, novel antimicrobials, which might be active against A. baumannii, are urgently needed. The application of lytic bacteriophages is a potential solution to this problem. Recently, several lytic bacteriophages infecting A. baumannii clinical strains have been characterized [6]–[9]. However, research focusing on A. baumannii infection by specific virulent bacteriophages and investigations of different phases of the phage infection process are still lacking.
Studies of bacteriophages and their infection of host cells benefit from using direct methods of investigation, since they provide important information which complements microbiological data. Atomic force microscopy has already become a widespread tool for studying microbial surfaces (for reviews, see [10]–[11]). Comparably easy sample preparation procedures, ability to operate in ambient or aqueous conditions, possibility to obtain 3D topographical images and evaluate mechanical properties of the sample under investigation make AFM the most efficient tool for studying bacteriophages and infected bacterial cells among the other high resolution types of microscopy, such as electron microscopy (EM) methods. AFM allows investigating specific interaction at the level of a single bacterial cell or even less [12]. AFM was used for the investigation of phages adsorption on the surfaces under different conditions [13]–[16]. For example, it was shown that PEG modification of T4 bacteriophages leads to their aggregation on the mica surface [13] and adsorption of phages to the surface may be affected by pH value [14], underlying pattern [15] or type of environment [16]. The stiffness of bacteriophage capsid as a function of packaged genome length and ionic environment was studied using AFM nanoindentation experiments [17]–[18]. Advantages of AFM over transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for investigation of extruding filamentous phages from E. coli cells were reported by M. Ploss and A. Kuhn [19]. Higher number of extruding phages observed by AFM was attributed to the rupture of some of them during sample preparation for TEM. Recently, we have developed investigation protocols for bacteriophage infection of bacterial cells using AFM [20]. This approach allows monitoring different stages of the process of infection, from phages adsorption on the cell surface to the release of new born phages and destruction of the host cell. Different aspects of bacteriophage infection of E. coli, S. Enteritidis, B. thuringiensis strains and some pelagic bacteria were studied using AFM [19]–[22].
In the present study, we have performed the analysis of the A. baumannii phage AP22 lytic cycle and AFM visualization of the interaction between the phage and host bacterial cells. AFM was also used to analyze the surface of A. baumannii cells and their phages, formation of bacterial aggregates and their dispersal during phage infection.
Results
Microbiological Assessment of Phage AP22 Infection
Bacteriophage AP22 efficiently lysing clinically relevant multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains has been recently described. According to TEM, the phage was found to be a representative of the Myoviridae family with an icosahedrical head of 64 nm in diameter and a contractile tail of 85–90 nm in length [9].
A. baumannii 1053 strain forming mucoid colonies on the agar plates was used as a host for bacteriophage AP22 propagation. The phage formed clear, round plaques surrounded by expanding with time opaque haloes on bacterial lawn of the strain (figure 1). These halo zones can indicate the presence of phage depolymerase capable of degrading exopolysaccharide or extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) secreted by A. baumannii mucoid cells [23], [24].
Phage AP22 plaques with opaque haloes on the host A. baumannii 1053 strain.
In our previous work the phage AP22 adsorption assay and one-step growth experiments were performed in a phage-bacteria system [9]. Bacteriophage AP22 was shown to have an initial phase of very rapid adsorption to the host bacterium (more than 99% of the phages adsorbed within 5 min) followed by a period of slower adsorption. One-step growth experiments have demonstrated a 40-min latent period and a burst size of approximately 240 phage particles per one infected bacterial cell [9].
Here, we have performed the experiments, studying the dynamics of phage AP22 infection process by determining the optical density (at 600 nm) of the A. baumannii 1053 infected cells at different times. These measurements were carried out at three different multiplicities of infection (MOI, the ratio of phage particles to host cells), including that used in our AFM experiments (MOI of 50). Infection curves pictured in the figure 2 suggest phage AP22 completely lyses the strain in approximately 60 minutes at MOI of 50 and 5 and in 120 minutes at MOI of 0.5. After lysis of A. baumannii 1053 liquid culture by the phage the optical density at 600 nm remains stable.
Representative curves are based on results from three independent assays of a non-infected A. baumannii culture and cultures infected at MOI of 0.5, 5 and 50. Standard deviations are indicated.
AFM Analysis of A. baumannii Bacteriophage AP22
Phage AP22 deposited on surfaces of mica and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) was examined using AFM, which clearly resolved the head and, in many cases, the tail of this phage (figure 3). AFM images have revealed dramatic difference in the apparent heights of bacteriophages, adsorbed onto these substrates, which is illustrated by the height distribution histograms in figure 3C, F: the heights of bacteriophages heads on HOPG lie within the range of 10–40 nm, whereas this range for mica substrate constitutes 40–70 nm. This phenomenon is probably connected with hydrophobic interaction of the bacteriophage protein head with graphite surface, which leads to the partial destruction of a phage particle. HOPG-induced partial destruction of tobacco mosaic virus was also reported elsewhere [25]–[26]. The shapes of the height histograms presented in figures 3C, F have two maximums, which demonstrate the presence of two states of bacteriophages: with full and (partially) empty heads. Taking into account that phages adsorbed on HOPG may be partly destroyed, we further refer to phage dimensions obtained on mica. Mean height of full bacteriophage heads (second maximum in the figure 3C) constitutes 62±1 nm. This value may be considered as an estimation of the real diameter of the bacteriophage head. The diameter of the phage AP22 head obtained by EM was 63–65 nm [9]. Such good compliance with EM results demonstrates that height measurements are quite accurate in our experiments. Small indentations in the center of empty heads, which correspond to capsids with (partially) released DNA, are often resolvable in AFM images (see upper inset in figure 3A, which was acquired in the deflection channel). The presence of heads with (partially) released DNA after their adsorption on mica was also reported by us for other bacteriophages [20]. Earlier works have reported the decreased rigidity of empty bacteriophages’ capsids [17], [27]. The observed release of DNA from bacteriophage heads may be initiated by osmotic shock during the rinsing stage [27], the drying of the sample [15] or the interaction with the substrate. Since the fraction of empty heads is much higher on HOPG than on mica (figure 3C, F), the latter reason plays bigger role for bacteriophage AP22 adsorption on HOPG. The length of the bacteriophage AP22 tail constitutes 88±9 nm that is in a good agreement with EM data (85–90 nm, [9]).
AFM height images (A, D), section analysis (B, E) and height distribution histograms (C, F) of bacteriophages AP22 deposited on the mica (top row) and HOPG (bottom row) surfaces. Sections are built along the dotted lines on the corresponding AFM images. Insets in A and D demonstrate zoomed bacteriophages from the same image. Top inset in A is presented in deflection channel to emphasize holes in the center of the phages.
AFM Analysis of A. baumannii cells and their Aggregates
A. baumannii cells, grown as described above, adsorb on the mica surface as aggregates comprising several tens of cells or more (typical aggregate is shown in figure 4). The estimation of the volumes of such aggregates from AFM images gives us the values in the range (10–100)×10−12µl (for example, the volume of the aggregate presented in the figure 4A is approximately 13×10−12µl). These estimations demonstrate that the quantity of such aggregates could be very high even in a 1 µL droplet of a suspension, which we used.
AFM height (A) and deflection (B) images of A. baumannii cells deposited on the mica surface. (C) Section analysis built along the horizontal line in (A). (D) Zoomed-in region of A. baumannii surface. The inset in (B) demonstrates zoomed-in region around bacterial aggregate (shown by the white square) with the EPS and pili.
One can see a relatively thin layer about 15 nm in height and 100–200 nm in width together with a very dense network of radial linear structures around A. baumannii aggregates (see figure 4B). According to earlier works with similar AFM observations of A. baumannii cells we attribute the layer to the protective matrix made of EPS [28] and radial structures to pili [23]. The length of pili measured from the edge of the cells ranges from 0.5 to 1.7 µm and their apparent height on the surface is below 1 nm. The real diameter of pili may be higher due to “height lowering effect” of AFM tip in contact mode.
AFM revealed different sizes (especially the length) of the cells, probably indicating different stages of cell growth. However, their length, width and height may be estimated from AFM images as follows: 1–2 µm (length), 0.75–1 µm (width) and 0.4–0.5 µm (height). The surface of A. baumannii cells is zoomed in figure 4D, which demonstrates the typical ripple structure of the bacterial envelope [23]. Its root mean square (RMS) roughness is about 2.5 nm.
AFM analysis of the A. baumannii Bacteriophage AP22 Lytic Cycle
In the next series of experiments we studied the morphology of A. baumannii cells, incubated with their phages at 37 °C during different periods of time varying from 1 to 60 minutes. Cells lose their biofilm-like structure after interaction with the phage that can be concluded from the obtained AFM images. In most cases such cells adsorbed onto mica individually and sometimes in pairs (only for one-minute period of incubation) (figures 5–6). Bacteriophage adsorption onto the surface of A. baumannii cells was already visible in AFM images after 1 minute of their mutual incubation (figures 5A, B). Obviously, these phages serve as an excellent disaggregation factor (additional AFM image, demonstrating separation of the aggregates at a lower scale is included in figure S1).
Left row: deflection AFM images of A. baumannii cells incubated with bacteriophages AP22 for 1 (A), 3(C), 6 (E) minutes. Right row: zoomed-in three dimensional reconstructions of bacterial surfaces depicted on the left (the zoomed regions are indicated by dotted circles in the height images). The inset in (A) demonstrates zoomed-in region, shown by the white square.
The number of adsorbed phages significantly increased during the following 10 minutes of their incubation with the cells (figures 5C–F). In contrast to what had been observed in the experiments on phages adsorption onto mica and graphite surfaces, almost all of adsorbed on the host cells bacteriophages had empty heads. This indicates that DNA release takes place quite fast or probably immediately upon phages adsorption on the host cell. RMS roughness of the cell surface has increased to 3–4 nm for the samples deposited after six minutes of incubation. The height of the cells has not changed significantly within the first minutes of phage-cells incubation.
The results of bacteriophages AP22 incubation with A. baumannii cells during 15, 30 and 60 minutes are presented in the AFM images in figure 6. We can see very dense phage adsorption on the cell and, beginning from 30 minutes of incubation, significant changes in the shape of bacterial cells. The apparent height of the cell became inhomogeneous along the cell, varying from 70 to 200 nm (figure 6D–I) that is 2–5 times lower than the cells height measured on the reference AFM images (see figure 4). Variations of the morphology of A. baumannii cells infected for 30 minutes are presented in figure S2. 60-minutes incubation leads to the destruction of the cells (that can be concluded from the complete loss of their normal shape and height) and the release of newborn phages from the cell (figures 6G–I, variations are presented in figures S3 and S4). Changes of the shape of infected A. baumannii cells are accompanied by the significant increase of RMS roughness of the cell wall surface up to 10 nm and more.
AFM deflection (A, D) and height (G) images of A. baumannii cells incubated with bacteriophages AP22 for 15 (A), 30 (D), 60 (G) minutes. (B), (E) and (H) represent the section analysis along the dotted lines on (A), (D) and (G) correspondingly. (C), (F) and (I) – zoomed-in three dimensional reconstructions of bacterial surfaces depicted on the left.
Discussion
Recently, several other lytic A. baumannii phages have been described [6]–[8]. They demonstrated high efficacy of adsorption, short latent periods (not exceeding 20 minutes) and large burst sizes (more than 100 PFU/infected cell). Here, using AFM in complement to microbiological assays, we have investigated A. baumannii phage AP22 and its lytic cycle. Phage AP22 exhibited very fast adsorption and ability to completely lyse a liquid culture of the host strain in different time depending on MOI.
Since AFM was utilized for the first time to study specific interaction of bacteriophage with A. baumannii, we have used scanning in air as in the methodologically simplest conditions of operation, especially for high resolution imaging. Despite possible artifacts due to drying, information regarding the morphology of biological objects (in our case bacteriophages and infected cells) remains valuable that was demonstrated many times in previous works (e.g., [23], [29]–[32]). Also it should be noted that A. baumannii can survive for long periods on dry surfaces [4], [33].
Stagnantly incubated A. baumannii cells are able to form biofilms at the air-liquid interface (so called pellicles) [23], [34]–[36]. AFM images of A. baumannii pellicles incubated for 24 hours demonstrated big colony islands more than 100 µm in diameter, accompanied by microcolonies in their vicinity [23]. Remarkably, both AFM images of A. baumannii big pellicles [23] and small aggregates (figures 4A, B) reveal the presence of the EPS matrix and pili, which were considered to be the attributes of A. baumannii biofilm formation [37]. The presence of these attributes together with the use of short incubation time (90 minutes) of A. baumannii cells before their deposition onto mica allows suggesting that the observed cells aggregates (figure 4A) are early stage pellicles, or “proto-pellicles”. Formation (or inner reorganization) of these early stage pellicles on the mica surface is unlikely due to a very short time of their adsorption (only 1 minute) and the absence of nutrients.
Biofilm formation is an adaptation mechanism of the cells, which helps them to survive at harsh conditions [37]–[38] and, in particular, resist to antibiotic treatment [39]. Application of lytic phages is one of the most promising approaches for struggling against bacterial pathogens [40]. The lytic cycle of the novel bacteriophage AP22 was characterized using microbiological assessment and visualized by AFM. One-minute bacteriophage treatment of A. baumannii aggregates at 37°C has led to an almost complete dispersal of “proto-pellicles”, which was accompanied by phage adsorption on the cell surface (figures 5A, B). Significant surface changes were observed after 30 minutes of mutual incubation of A. baumannii cells with the phage. AFM results are in good compliance with the results of the microbiological assessment of infection process, which has also demonstrated the phage AP22 adsorption from the first minute of incubation and a latent period of 40 minutes [9].
Though the bacteriophage induced biofilm destruction was reported quite a lot of times (for review see Ian W. Sutherland et al. [24]), all its mechanisms are not well-known to date. In many cases biofilm dispersal is facilitated by polysaccharide-degrading enzymes which some bacteriophages possess [24]. The very fast “proto-pellicles” dispersal observed in our experiments after adding bacteriophages supposes that phage AP22 possibly possesses polysaccharide depolymerase, which is confirmed by the presence of haloes surrounding the phage plaques on the plates (figure 1).
Since the multiplicity of infection was very high in AFM experiments (MOI of 50), not all phages adsorbed on the surface of the cell, and part of them remained in the solution. That is why we have observed the adsorption of phages both on bacteria and mica. In order to compare the bacteriophage adsorption on these two surfaces we have evaluated the number of phages per square unit (n) adsorbed on mica and on bacteria after different times of bacteria incubation with phages (figure 7). The density of phages adsorbed on the host cells was much higher in all cases (for 1, 3, 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes of incubation). We observe a significant increase of the number of phages adsorbed on the host cell in the first 3 minutes of infection, when the density of adsorption reaches 50±20 particles/µm2. This number remained on the similar level (within the errors) at all later stages of the phage infection of bacteria. The level of the number of phages adsorbed on the mica surface was below 2 particles/µm2 at all times of incubation except for 60 min period, when the density increased to 3.2 particles/µm2. This should be connected with the release of the new bacteriophages from the cell. The density of adsorbed phages was averaged over large surfaces (compared to a surface of one cell). In this connection we should stress that local values of n may be much higher in the proximity of the new phage particles release from an infected cell.
The density of adsorption of bacteriophages AP22 on the surfaces of mica and bacteria for the samples incubated during different time periods.
The increase of the roughness of the infected bacterial cells is directly connected with the phage adsorption on the cell surface and with the damage of the cell wall (MOI is quite high in AFM experiments). During the late phase of the lytic cycle bacterial cell produces peptidoglycane lysing enzymes (endolysins), which destroy cells from within. This leads to a significant increase of the roughness (more than 10 nm). Even being measured in air, the changes in the surface roughness reflects the real changes of the cell wall during the infection process. For example, the roughness of the rippling structure (2.5 nm) may serve as a reference point for comparison of all further surface changes. Average RMS surface roughness of different A. baumannii strains measured from AFM images obtained in air, has also served as a characteristic of the cell surface upon its colistin treatment [29].
Concluding Remarks
Utilization of AFM together with microbiological assessment for investigation of the lytic cycle of bacteriophages gives an opportunity not only to compare data obtained independently, but also visualize infection process at the level of one cell. Studies of the dynamics of A. baumannii 1053 infection by phage AP22 have demonstrated that the phage completely lyses a liquid culture of the strain in 60–120 minutes depending on MOI. The presence of expanding with time opaque haloes on bacterial lawn of the strain has indicated phage-induced depolymerase activity. AFM has revealed the morphology of bacteriophages AP22 and A. baumannii cells, both alone as well as of infected A. baumannii cells at different stages of the lytic cycle, from phage adsorption to the cell lysis. Bacteriophages AP22 showed different apparent diameters of their heads depending on the surface to which they adsorb; however, the diameter of the head of the intact phage can be estimated as 62±1 nm and length of the tail as 88±9 nm. Phage specific adsorption to the host cell took place already during the first minute after phages addition to the cells. Estimation of the latent period of the studied phage and time needed for its specific adsorption, obtained from the analysis of AFM images, was in good agreement with one-step growth experiments [9]. Moreover, AFM has demonstrated strong ability of phage AP22 for fast “proto-pellicles” disaggregation that also suggests AP22- depolymerase activity.
Materials and Methods
Phage and Host Strain Propagation
In this work we used the recently described lytic phage AP22 specifically infecting A. baumannii [9]. Single plaque isolation was used to obtain pure phage stock. For that reason, a single plaque formed on the A. baumannii lawn was picked up in SM-buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgSO4, 100 mM NaCl) and replated three times. A. baumannii strain 1053 was used as the host for phage propagation. The strain was obtained from the State collection of pathogenic microorganisms and cellular cultures «SCPM-Obolensk» (accession number B7129) [9]. The bacterial culture of this strain was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or Nutrient Agar (Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited, India) at 37 °C. Phage AP22 was propagated using liquid culture of A. baumannii 1053 (OD600 of 0.3) at MOI of 0.1. The incubation was performed at 37°C until complete lysis.
Determination of Infection Parameters
The ability of phage AP22 to infect A. baumannii 1053 cells in a liquid culture at different multiplicities of infection (MOI) was estimated using approach like in [41]. Briefly, the optical density at 600 nm of phage propagation A. baumannii 1053 strain infected at MOI of 50, 5, and 0.5 at 37°C was determined in definite time intervals.
Bacterial Cell and Bacteriophage Preparation for AFM Experiments
For AFM experiments beforehand propagated and titrated phages (109 PFU ml−1) were used. An overnight liquid bacterial culture of A. baumannii 1053 strain incubated at 37°C without shaking was diluted in fresh LB-broth and grown stagnantly during 90 minutes at 37°C. Then, the bacterial culture was divided into control and experimental parts. The control part was incubated without phages and the experimental part was mixed with the phage at MOI of 50. This MOI was used to make interaction of the phage with bacterial host cells more obvious. Aliquots of these samples incubated at 37°C were taken at different times (varying from 1 to 60 min) to investigate the bacteriophage infection process with AFM.
AFM Sample Preparation and Imaging
Square plates (approximately 7×7 mm) from mica or HOPG (for phages adsorption only) were used as substrates in AFM experiments. Either A. baumannii cells or their mixture with phages (sample) taken as described above were diluted 11 times by adding 1 µl of this sample to a milli-Q water droplet (10-µl), deposited directly onto a freshly cleaved mica surface. Then the sample was left for 1 minute for adsorption, gently rinsed from the pipette with 200 µl of Milli-Q water and dried in the laminar flow hood. All specimens were prepared prior to AFM imaging. Nanoscope III (DI, Santa Barbara, USA), equipped with 150-µm scanner and operated in contact mode in air, was used for AFM experiments. Commercial silicon CSC11 cantilevers (MikroMasch) had a typical spring constant of 0.35 N/m. The FemtoScan software (Advanced Technologies Center, Russia) was used for image processing. The scan angle was 90° and the scan rate was typically 2 Hz with 512 lines.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
AFM image of A. baumannii cells infected for 5 minutes. Scan size is 50 µm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047348.s001
(DOC)
Figure S2.
AFM height (left row), deflection (middle row) images and section analysis (right row) along the dotted lines on the corresponding AFM images of A. baumannii cells incubated with bacteriophages AP22 for 30 minutes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047348.s002
(DOC)
Figure S3.
AFM height (left) and deflection (right) images of A. baumannii cells incubated with bacteriophages AP22 for 60 minutes. Scan size is 4.2 µm.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047348.s003
(DOC)
Figure S4.
AFM image of A. baumannii cells infected for 60 minutes. Scan size is 13 µm. The height of the infected cells ranges from 50 to 100 nm, indicating that they are destroyed.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047348.s004
(DOC)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: AP ED NV. Performed the experiments: AP ED SK. Analyzed the data: AP ED NV SI. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ED AP SK SI TI IY NV. Wrote the paper: AP ED NV SI.
References
- 1. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL (2008) Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 21: 538–582.
- 2. Towner KJ (2009) Acinetobacter: an old friend, but a new enemy. J Hosp Infect 73(4): 355–63.
- 3. Webster CA, Crow M, Humphreys H, Towner KS (1998) Surveillance of an adult intensive care unit for a long-term persistence of a multiresistant strain of Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 17: 171–176.
- 4. Wendt C, Dietz B, Dietz E, Ruden H (1997) Survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1394–1397.
- 5. de Oliveira AC, Damasceno QS (2010) Surfaces of the hospital environment as possible deposits of resistant bacteria: a review. Rev Esc Enferm USP 44: 1118–23.
- 6. Yang HJ, Liang L, Lin SX, Jia SR (2010) Isolation and characterization of a virulent bacteriophage AB1 of Acinetobacter baumannii. BMC Microbiol 10: 131.
- 7. Lin NT, Chiou PY, Chang KC, Chen LK, Lai MJ (2010) Isolation and characterization of φAB2: a novel bacteriophage of Acinetobacter baumannii. Res Microbiol 161: 308–314.
- 8. Lee CN, Tseng TT, Lin JW, Fu YC, Weng SF, et al. (2011) Lytic myophage Abp53 encodes several proteins similar to those encoded by host Acinetobacter baumannii and phage phiKO2. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(19): 6755–6762.
- 9. Popova AV, Zhilenkov EL, Myakinina VP, Krasilnikova VM, Volozhantsev NV (2012) Isolation and characterization of wide host range lytic bacteriophage AP22 infecting Acinetobacter baumannii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 332: 40–46.
- 10. Dupres V, Alsteens D, Andre G, Dufrene YF (2010) Microbial nanoscopy: a closer look at microbial cell surfaces. Trends Microbiol 18: 397–405.
- 11. Bolshakova AV, Kiselyova OI, Yaminsky IV (2004) Microbial surfaces investigated using atomic force microscopy. Biotechnol Prog 20: 1615–1622.
- 12. Dubrovin EV, Fedyukina GN, Kraevsky SV, Ignatyuk TE, Yaminsky IV, et al. (2012) AFM specific identification of bacterial cell fragments on biofunctional surfaces. Open Microbiol J 6: 22–28.
- 13. Archer MJ, Liu JL (2009) Bacteriophage T4 nanoparticles as materials in sensor applications: variables that influence their organization and assembly on surfaces. Sensors 9: 6298–6311.
- 14. Jeon DY, Hwang KH, Park SJ, Kim YJ, Joo MK, et al. (2011) Controlled surface adsorption of fd filamentous phage by tuning of the pH and the functionalization of the surface. J Appl Phys 109: 064701.
- 15. Fang J, Knobler CM, Gingery M, Eiserling FA (1997) Imaging bacteriophage T4 on patterned organosilane monolayers by scanning force microscopy. J Phys Chem B 101: 8692–8695.
- 16. Lyubchenko YL, Oden PI, Lampner D, Lindsay SM, Dunker KA (1993) Atomic force microscopy of DNA and bacteriophage in air, water and propanol: the role of adhesion forces. Nucl Acid Res 21(5): 1117–1123.
- 17. Ivanovska I, Wuite G, Jonsson B, Evilevitch A (2007) Internal DNA pressure modifies stability of WT phage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 9603–9608.
- 18. Evilevitch A, Roos WH, Ivanovska IL, Jeembaeva M, Jönsson B, et al. (2011) Effects of salts on internal DNA pressure and mechanical properties of phage capsids. J Mol Biol 405: 18–23.
- 19. Ploss M, Kuhn A (2010) Kinetics of filamentous phage assembly. Phys Biol 7: 045002.
- 20. Dubrovin EV, Voloshin AG, Kraevsky SV, Ignatyuk TE, Abramchuk SS, et al. (2008) Atomic force microscopy investigation of phage infection of bacteria. Langmuir 24: 13068–13074.
- 21. Chen YY, Wu CC, Hsu JL, Peng HL, Chang HY, et al. (2009) Surface rigidity change of Escherichia coli after filamentous bacteriophage infection. Langmuir 25: 4607–4614.
- 22. Malfatti F, Samo TJ, Azam F (2010) High-resolution imaging of pelagic bacteria by atomic force microscopy and implications for carbon cycling. ISME J 4: 427–439.
- 23. Marti S, Chabane YN, Alexandre S, Coquet L, Vila J, et al. (2011) Growth of Acinetobacter baumannii in pellicle enhanced the expression of potential virulence factors. PLoS ONE 6(10): e26030
- 24. Sutherland IW, Hughes KA, Skillman LC, Tait K (2004) The interaction of phage and biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 232: 1–6.
- 25. Britt DW, Buijs J, Hlady V (1998) Tobacco mosaic virus adsorption on self-assembled and Langmuir–Blodgett monolayers studied by TIRF and SFM. Thin Solid Films 327: 824–828.
- 26. Dubrovin EV, Kirikova MN, Novikov VK, Drygin YF, Yaminsky IV (2004) Study of the peculiarities of adhesion of tobacco mosaic virus by atomic force microscopy. Colloid J 66: 673–678.
- 27. Matsko N, Klinov D, Manykin A, Demin V, Klimenko SJ (2001) Atomic force microscopy analysis of bacteriophages phi KZ and T4. J Electron Microsc 50: 417–422.
- 28. Teschke O (2005) Volume of Extracellular Polymeric Substance Coverage of Individual Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Bacterium Measured by Atomic Force Microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 67: 312–316.
- 29. Soon RL, Nation RL, Hartley PG, Larson I, Li J (2009) Atomic force microscopy investigation of the morphology and topography of colistin-heteroresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains as a function of growth phase and in response to colistin treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(12): 4979–86.
- 30. Dubrovin EV, Drygin YF, Novikov VK, Yaminsky IV (2007) Atomic force microscopy as a tool of inspection of viral infection. Nanomedicine 3: 128–131.
- 31. Braga PC, Ricci D (2002) Differences in the susceptibility of Streptococcus pyogenes to rokitamycin and erythromycin A revealed by morphostructural atomic force microscopy. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 457–460.
- 32. Eaton P, Fernandes JC, Pereira E, Pintado ME, Malcata FX (2008) Atomic force microscopy study of the antibacterial effects of chitosans on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Ultramicroscopy 108: 1128–1134.
- 33. Antunes LCS, Imperi F, Carattoli A, Visca P (2011) Deciphering the Multifactorial Nature of Acinetobacter baumannii Pathogenicity. PLoS ONE 6: e22674.
- 34. Davey ME, O’Toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64: 847–867.
- 35. Tomaras AP, Dorsey CW, Edelmann RE, Actis LA (2003) Attachment to and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Acinetobacter baumannii: involvement of a novel chaperone-usher pili assembly system. Microbiol 149: 3473–3484.
- 36. Friedman L, Kolter R (2004) Genes involved in matrix formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilms. Mol Microbiol 51: 675–690.
- 37. Espinal P, Marti S, Vila J (2012) Effect of biofilm formation on the survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces. J Hosp Infect 80: 56–60.
- 38. de Breij A, Dijkshoorn L, Lagendijk E, van der Meer J, Koster A, et al. (2010) Do biofilm formation and interactions with human cells explain the clinical success of Acinetobacter baumannii? PLoS ONE 5(5): e10732.
- 39. Lee HW, Koh YM, Kim J, Lee JC, Lee YC, et al. (2008) Capacity of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to form biofilm and adhere to epithelial cell surfaces. Clin Microbiol Infect 14(1): 49–54.
- 40. Ryan EM, Gorman SP, Donnelly RF, Gilmore BF (2011) Recent advances in bacteriophage therapy: how delivery routes, formulation, concentration and timing influence the success of phage therapy. J Pharm Pharmacol 63: 1253–1264.
- 41. Vandersteegen K, Mattheus W, Ceyssens PJ, Bilocq F, De Vos D, et al. (2011) Microbiological and molecular assessment of bacteriophage ISP for the control of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS ONE 6(9): e24418.