Figures
Abstract
Background
Lipids can act as signaling molecules, activating intracellular and membrane-associated receptors to regulate physiological functions. To understand how a newly discovered signaling lipid functions, it is necessary to identify and characterize the enzymes involved in their production and inactivation. The signaling lipid N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) is known to activate intracellular and membrane-associated receptors and regulate physiological functions, but little is known about the enzymes involved in its production and inactivation.
Principal Findings
Here we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae produce and inactivate PEA, suggesting that genetic manipulations of this lower eukaryote may be used to identify the enzymes involved in PEA metabolism. Accordingly, using single gene deletion mutants, we identified yeast genes that control PEA metabolism, including SPO14 (a yeast homologue of the mammalian phospholipase D) that controls PEA production and YJU3 (a yeast homologue of the mammalian monoacylglycerol lipase) that controls PEA inactivation. We also found that PEA metabolism is affected by heterologous expression of two mammalian proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases, namely huntingtin and α-synuclein.
Significance
Together these findings show that forward and reverse genetics in S. cerevisiae can be used to identify proteins involved in PEA production and inactivation, and suggest that mutated proteins causing neurodegenerative diseases might affect the metabolism of this important signaling lipid.
Citation: Muccioli GG, Sia A, Muchowski PJ, Stella N (2009) Genetic Manipulation of Palmitoylethanolamide Production and Inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 4(6): e5942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005942
Editor: Paul Cobine, Auburn University, United States of America
Received: November 14, 2008; Accepted: May 21, 2009; Published: June 16, 2009
Copyright: © 2009 Muccioli et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the NIH (DA021389 to N.S. and NS47237 to P.J.M.) and by the Charcot Foundation (Belgium) to GGM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Lipids are the building blocks of cell membranes, and their turnover is regulated by specific enzymes, including lipases and acyltransferases. Stimuli that regulate the activity of these enzymes may transiently change lipid turnover and cause the release of specific lipids from cell membranes. Released lipids may then activate intracellular and membrane-associated receptors, and thus act as second messengers, transmitters and hormones. The biological actions of released lipids are terminated by hydrolysis or chemical modification. Thus, since the biological action of released lipids depends on their rate of production and inactivation, the enzymatic steps involved in these processes must be fully appreciated to understand their signaling function.
The endocannabinoids (eCBs) N-arachidonoylethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) are signaling lipids that act through membrane-associated cannabinoid receptors and regulate neurotransmission, inflammation, and other physiopathological functions [1]. Anandamide is an N-acylethanolamine (N-AE) and 2-AG is a glycerolacylester. Both contain a C20:4 acyl chain, but their respective polar groups impinge distinct pharmacological profiles at cannabinoid receptors [2]. PEA, a signaling lipid of the N-AE family, contains a C16:0 acyl chain and acts on its own membrane-associated and intracellular receptors, including Gpr55 and PPARα [3], [4]. Thus, while anandamide, 2-AG, and PEA are structurally related, these lipids possess different bioactivities, and unraveling their respective functions will require a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms controlling their production and inactivation.
Anandamide, 2-AG, and PEA may be independently released from cell membranes [5], [6], suggesting that independent enzymes and molecular mechanisms control their production. To date, at least four enzymes have been implicated in anandamide production: a subtype of phospholipase D (Nape-Pld), phospholipase C (Plc), phosphatase (Ptpn22) and hydrolase (α/β-hydrolase 4) [7]–[9]. Four enzymes have been implicated in 2-AG production: Plc-β, α- and β- diacylglycerol lipase, and lyso-Plc [10]–[13]. Only one enzyme has been implicated in PEA production: Nape-Pld [14]. Thus, little is known about PEA production.
Anandamide is predominantly inactivated by fatty acid amide hydrolase (Faah) and, under certain conditions, by cyclooxygenase, lipooxygenase, and N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (Naaa) [15]–[19]. 2-AG is inactivated by monoacylglycerol lipase (Mgl), triacylglycerol lipase, cyclooxygenases, lipooxygenases, and the newly identified α/β-hydrolase 6, α/β-hydrolase 12 (Abhd12), and Neuropathy target esterase [20]–[25]. PEA is inactivated by Faah and Naaa [16], [26]–[27] and possibly by a unidentified enzyme expressed by microglial cells [28]. Thus, at least one enzyme that inactivates PEA remains to be identified at the molecular level.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been extensively used as genetic tool to dissect metabolic pathways, including those involved in lipid production and inactivation. Although these cells have no genes encoding for receptors activated by anandamide and 2-AG, they express Oaf1/Pip2, a functional homologue of PPARα activated by PEA [29]. Furthermore, S. cerevisiae expresses enzymes closely related to those which produce and inactivate N-AEs and glycerolacylesters in mammalian cells (Table 1). Thus, it is possible that these lower eukaryotes may also produce and inactivate anandamide, 2-AG and PEA. If so, genetic screens could be used to systematically identify genes controlling their production and inactivation.
Here we addressed these possibilities by determining if S. cerevisiae produce anandamide, 2-AG and PEA (as well as several additional related N-AEs). We also tested whether single gene deletions or heterologous expression of mammalian proteins affects the production and inactivation of such signaling lipids.
Results
We used chemical ionization gas chromatography mass spectrometry (CI-GC-MS) to determine if yeast produce anandamide, 2-AG, PEA, as well as several other bioactive N-AEs: stearoylethanolamide (SEA), oleoylethanolamide (OEA), homo-γ-linolenoylethanolamide (HEA) and docosatetraenoylethanolamide (DEA). SEA acts through an unknown receptor, OEA acts through PPARα, while HEA and DEA are closely related to anandamide and also act on CB1 receptors [30]–[34].
Yeast Produce PEA
To identify and quantify the levels of these lipids, we spiked yeast homogenates with corresponding deuterated standards and performed isotope-dilution quantifications [35]. Since deuterated standards contain trace amounts of the lipid itself (typically a few percent), we first determined the amount of yeast homogenate required to generate an ion current ratio that is statistically greater than that generated by the standards alone. Yeast cells were grown to saturation and homogenized, and the total protein concentrations quantified. Total homogenate (0.5, 1, and 3 mg of total protein) was chloroform-extracted in the presence of 200 pmol of the deuterated standards and analyzed by isotope-dilution CI-GC-MS. We found that the ion current ratios of PEA/[2H4]-PEA generated by 1 and 3 mg of yeast homogenates were the only ones statistically greater than those generated by standards alone (Figure 1). Denser samples led to chromatography overload, precluding quantitative analysis. Conversion of the ratios showed that yeast produce 0.65 pmol of PEA per mg of protein, well within the range generated in mammalian tissue [35].
Increasing amounts of yeast homogenate (0, 0.5, 1, and 3 mg of protein per sample) were analyzed by CI-GC-MS and the non-deuterated/deuterated ratios determined using 200 pmol of [2H5]-2-AG and [2H4]-N-AEs standards. Values are the mean±SEM of three to four independent experiments, performed in duplicate, and demonstrate that only PEA is reliably detected in yeast homogenates using this method. * P<0.05 and ** P<0.01 compared to the ratios obtained in the absence of yeast homogenate (ANOVA one-way, Dunnett's post test).
The Lipase Spo4 Contributes to PEA Production
In the next series of experiments, we used a candidate gene approach and selected ten yeast strains with single gene deletions for various lipases and acyltransferases (Table 1), and determined the effects of these mutations on PEA production compared to wild type yeast. Figure 2 shows that PEA production was reduced by 46% in spo14Δ cells, which lack a phospholipase D-like activity, and that this reduction was fully rescued when this gene was reintroduced. None of the other mutations affected PEA levels (Figure S1). These results suggest that the phospholipase D-like activity of Spo14 is responsible for producing PEA in yeast.
PEA levels in SPO14 gene-deleted yeast strain (spo14Δ) are compared to wild-type strain (WT), and to the PEA levels measured in a SPO14 gene-deleted yeast strain in which an SPO14 ORF was reintroduced (SPO14 ORF). Values are the mean±SEM of three experiments, performed in duplicate. ** P<0.01 compared to PEA levels obtained for WT yeast (ANOVA one-way, Dunnett's post test).
Yeast Hydrolyze PEA
Next we assessed the ability of yeast to inactivate PEA. Indeed, yeast homogenates hydrolyzed [3H]-PEA in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, yielding a specific activity of 5.0×10−3 pmol/min/mg of protein that reached saturation when using 100 µg of protein (Figure 3A and 3B). To ascertain that a protein was responsible for PEA hydrolysis, we subjected yeast homogenates to heat-induced denaturation. Boiling or autoclaving these samples reduced hydrolysis by only ∼50% (Figure 3C). Since some enzymes produced by lower organisms are highly resistant to heat-induced denaturation [36], we also microwaved the homogenates. This regimen also reduced [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by ∼50% (Figure 3C). As positive control for these experiments, we used homogenates of human embryonic kidney cells HEK293 cells. These cells hydrolyzed [3H]-PEA in a protein-concentration and time-dependent manner, yielding a specific activity of 3.9×10−2 pmol/min/mg of protein that reached saturation when using 40 µg of protein (Figure 3D,E). This activity was lost when homogenates were boiled, autoclaved, or microwaved (Figure 3F).
[3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast homogenates is protein concentration-dependent (A; 20 min incubation) and time-dependent (B; 60 µg of protein). Similarly, HEK293 cells homogenates hydrolyze [3H]-PEA in a protein concentration- (D; 20 min incubation) and time-dependent manner (E; 20 µg of protein). When submitted to denaturing conditions such as heat or microwaves, ≈50% of the yeast PEA-hydrolytic activity (C) and ≈100% of the HEK293 cells homogenate activity (F) are lost, suggesting that part of the hydrolytic activity in yeast in heat-resistant. [3H]-PEA hydrolysis is greatly reduced in yeast homogenates incubated with α-chymotrypsin or with protease from Streptomyces griseus (G) confirming the enzymatic nature of the entire PEA hydrolysis. Data points are the mean±SEM of three to four experiments done in duplicate. ** P<0.01 compared to control homogenates (ANOVA one-way, Dunnett's post test).
To determine whether both the heat-sensitive and heat-resistant PEA hydrolysis in yeast were due to proteins, we treated the yeast homogenates with trypsin, α-chemotrypsin, and a protease from Streptomyces griseus. Figure 3G shows that both α-chemotrypsin and the Streptomyces griseus protease reduced the entire PEA hydrolysis activity by 96% and 99%, respectively, showing that both heat-sensitive and heat-resistant activities are due to proteins.
A Serine Hydrolase Distinct From FAAH Hydrolyzes PEA
We performed an initial biochemical characterization of the enzymatic activity responsible for [3H]-PEA hydrolysis. In yeast, unlabelled PEA inhibited this activity in dose-dependent manner, reaching ∼50% inhibition at 100 µM PEA (Figure 4A). In HEK293 homogenates, unlabelled PEA competed for [3H]-PEA hydrolysis, reaching 50% inhibition at 3.1 µM and 90% inhibition at 100 µM PEA (Figure 4D). [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast homogenates was marginally affected by changes in pH (Figure 4B), suggesting that several yeast enzymes can hydrolyze PEA, each at their optimal pH value. In contrast, hydrolysis by HEK293 cells was clearly pH dependent, increasing by 10-fold between pH 3 and 9 (Figure 4E), suggesting hydrolysis by a single enzyme with optimal activity at pH 9. One such enzyme is Faah [26], [27], [37].
The effect of increasing concentrations of PEA on [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast (A) and HEK293 cells (D) homogenates and the influence of the pH on [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast (B) and HEK293 cells (E) homogenates were determined. The following buffers were used (100 mM): NaAcetate (pH 3–5), HEPES (pH 6–7), Tris (pH 8–9) and Na2B4O7 (pH 10–11). The serine hydrolase inhibitors PMSF and MAFP and the specific Faah inhibitor URB597 differentially affected [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast (C) and HEK cells (F) homogenates. Data points represent the mean±SEM of 3 to 5 experiments performed in duplicate and are expressed as percentage of control. * P<0.05 and ** P<0.01 compared to control homogenates (ANOVA one-way, Dunnett's post test).
Three chemically distinct inhibitors (PMSF, MAFP, and URB597) were tested on PEA hydrolysis by both yeast and HEK293 cell homogenates. While both PMSF and URB597 were inactive on [3H]-PEA hydrolysis by yeast homogenates, MAFP at 300 nM inhibited 50% of this activity, suggesting the involvement of a serine hydrolase (Figure 4C). In HEK293 cells homogenates, PMSF and MAFP partially inhibited [3H]-PEA hydrolysis, leaving approximately 30% of the activity intact, while URB597 fully inhibited [3H]-PEA hydrolysis (Figure 4F). These results suggest that the enzyme(s) responsible for PEA hydrolysis in yeast is/are most likely a serine hydrolase(s) distinct from Faah, whereas Faah is likely the main enzyme responsible for PEA hydrolysis in HEK293 cells.
The Serine Hydrolase Yju3 Contributes to PEA Hydrolysis
When testing the ten yeast strains with single gene mutations that we had selected (Table 1), we found that PEA hydrolysis was reduced by 49% in yju3Δ, a strain that lacks a serine hydrolase orthologous to the mammalian MGL (Figure 5A). This reduction in activity was not only rescued when the YJU3 gene was reintroduced, but PEA hydrolysis was actually greatly increased (Figure 5A). This increased PEA hydrolyzing activity exhibited by Yju3-bearing yeast strains was reduced by 57% by MAFP and by 85% when its homogenates were heat-inactivated (Figure 5B), suggesting that the MGL-like activity of Yju3 is responsible for the heat-sensitive PEA hydrolyzing activity expressed by yeast.
[3H]-PEA hydrolysis in YJU3 gene-deleted yeast strain (yju3Δ) is compared to wild-type strain (WT), and to the hydrolysis measured in a YJU3 gene-deleted yeast strain in which an YJU3 ORF was reintroduced (YJU3 ORF) (A). The [3H]-PEA hydrolysis found in the Yju3 expressing strain (i.e. YJU3 ORF expressing strain (CTL)) is partially sensitive to MAFP inhibition and sensitive to denaturing conditions (boiled) (B). Values are the mean±SEM of three experiments performed in duplicate and are expressed as percentage of control. ** P<0.01 compared to control (ANOVA one-way, Dunnett's post test).
Interestingly, plc1Δ and isc1Δ, two strains deficient in Plc-like activity, led to a small, but significant increase in PEA hydrolysis, suggesting compensatory mechanisms (Figure S1). Furthermore, genetic deletion of AMD2, a yeast homologue of Faah, did not affect PEA production or inactivation (Figure S1), which strengthens the conclusion that PEA is hydrolyzed by a yeast enzyme without Faah-like activity.
Mutant Huntingtin and α-Synuclein Affect PEA Production and Inactivation
Because several mammalian proteins involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases are known to affect lipid metabolism [38], and several neuropathologies lead to changes in PEA levels in brain [39], we expressed mutant huntingtin (Htt) fragments and α-synuclein in yeast and assessed their effect on PEA production and inactivation.
Htt fragments containing 25 and 103 polyglutamine repeats (25Q and 103Q), as well as α-synuclein, each increased by ∼2 fold the levels of PEA (Figure 6A–C), whereas the empty vector had no significant effect (data not shown). To determine if this increase in PEA production involves Spo14, we expressed Htt fragments and α-synuclein in the spo14Δ strain, and measured PEA levels. Remarkably, PEA levels were also increased by ∼2 fold by these pathogenic fragments and proteins in this strain (Figure 6A–C), suggesting that they induce the expression of another PEA producing enzyme.
PEA levels found in BY4741 yeast strains expressing a 25Q and 103Q huntingtin fragment and in yeast strain expressing α-synuclein (BY4741) were compared to BY4741 strains expressing an empty vector (dotted line). Similarly PEA levels found in SPO14 gene-deleted yeast strains expressing the same proteins (spo14Δ) were compared to spo14Δ strains expressing an empty vector (dotted line) (A–C). Values are the mean±SEM of three to five experiments performed in duplicate and are expressed as percentage of corresponding control (empty vector expressing BY4741 strain and empty vector expressing spo14Δ strain, respectively). ** P<0.05 and ** P<0.01 compared to respective control (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test).
With regard to PEA hydrolysis, Htt25Q reduced it by 65%, Htt103Q had a small (17%), but significant effect, and α-synuclein reduced this activity by 32% (Figure 7A–C). The empty vector had no significant effect (data not shown). To determine if this decrease in PEA hydrolysis involves Yju3, we expressed Htt fragments and α-synuclein in the yju3Δ strain. Here too, PEA hydrolysis was similarly decreased by these pathogenic fragments and proteins (Figure 7A–C), suggesting that they reduce the expression of another PEA hydrolyzing enzyme.
[3H]-PEA hydrolysis measured in BY4741 yeast strains expressing a 25Q and 103Q huntingtin fragment and in yeast strain expressing α-synuclein (BY4741) were compared to BY4741 strains expressing an empty vector (dotted line). Similarly [3H]-PEA hydrolysis found in YJU3 gene-deleted yeast strains expressing the same proteins (yju3Δ) were compared to yju3Δ strains expressing an empty vector (dotted line) (A–C). Values are the mean±SEM of three to five experiments performed in duplicate and are expressed as percentage of corresponding control (empty vector expressing BY4741 strain and empty vector expressing yju3Δ strain, respectively). ** P<0.05 and ** P<0.01 compared to respective control (unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test).
Discussion
PEA is a highly bioactive lipid that activates intracellular and membrane-bound receptors distinct from those activated by eCBs. The molecular machinery controlling PEA production and inactivation in mammalian cells is not fully understood [40]–[43]. Our results show that S. cerevisiae produce and inactivate PEA, and that this process is significantly altered by single gene deletions or heterologous expression of mammalian proteins involved in neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, our findings show that forward and reverse genetics in yeast can be used to identify the molecular components that control PEA production and inactivation.
Using CI-GC-MS and isotope-dilution, we demonstrated that S. cerevisiae produce significant amounts of PEA, a lipid that contains a C16:0 acyl chain, while not producing detectable amounts of anandamide, 2-AG, OEA, SEA, HEA, and DEA, all of which contain acyl chains with more than 16 carbon atoms. Accordingly, classic studies showed that lower eukaryotes cannot produce fatty-acid chains containing more than 16 carbon atoms despite the presence of two enzymes, fatty acid elongase and enoyl reductase, that are known to lengthen carbon acyl chains [44]–[46].
The amount of PEA we detected in yeast (650 pmol/g) is comparable to that in mouse brain (100–500 pmol/g) and cultured neural cells (1800–2200 pmol/g of protein) (for review see [35]). However, reliable PEA quantification required only 3 mg of yeast homogenate sample but 30 mg of mouse brain homogenate [35]. This 10-fold difference suggests that the polysaccharide wall in yeast is less invasive when analyzing PEA by CI-GC-MS than the rich lipidic environment of the brain.
PEA is also produced and hydrolyzed by plants, where it is thought to be a response mechanism to stressors and regulator of plant growth [47]. PEA was also quantified in Ciona intestinalis and in leech [48]. Together with our results, these studies show that PEA is produced by a wide variety of cell types and organisms. Whether PEA constitutes a building block of yeast membranes or carries the function of signaling lipid in these lower eukaryotes remains to be determined. Note that while we do not suggest that the function of PEA as a signaling lipid in mammalian cells is conserved in yeast, our data indicate that the basic machinery involved in its production and inactivation might be conserved, and therefore yeast constitute an incredibly efficient genetic tool to dissect the molecular mechanisms involved in PEA metabolism.
Genetic evidence demonstrating the involvement of specific enzymes in PEA production and inactivation is sparse. To our knowledge, only two examples have been reported: Nape-Pld, which affects PEA production, and Faah, which affects PEA inactivation [14], [26]. By screening 10 yeast gene deletion strains, we identified two additional candidates: Spo14 (coding for a Pld-like activity) and Yju3 (coding for a Mgl-like serine hydrolase activity). These genes have mammalian orthologs: Spo14 is related to Pld1 (coding for a phosphatidylcholine-hydrolyzing Pld1), and Yju3 is related to Mgl (coding for a monoglyceride lipase) and to some extent to Abhd12 (coding for a serine hydrolase recently implicated in eCB signaling [25]). The implication of a yeast homologue of Mgl and Abhd12 in PEA hydrolysis is remarkable for two reasons. First, it is known that mammalian Mgl does not hydrolyze PEA [21], suggesting that the mammalian Mgl evolved so as to preferentially hydrolyze acylesters rather than acylamide. Second, the substrate specificity of Abhd12 is still unknown, and our data suggest that this newly discovered serine hydrolase might use PEA as substrate and thus be involved in its inactivation in mammalian cells.
Approximately 50% of the PEA hydrolysis expressed by yeast is resistant to heat and microwave inactivation, but is fully blocked by enzymatic digestion. This result agrees with the fact that enzymes resistant to heat-induced denaturation are expressed by some lower organisms [36]. While the identity of this heat-resistant enzyme expressed by yeast remains to be determined, our results already suggest that it is unlikely to be a serine hydrolyze, since it is insensitive to the broad serine-hydrolase inhibitor MAFP.
We found that heterologous expression of huntingtin fragments 25Q and 103Q in yeast increased PEA level by ∼2 fold, showing that the ability of huntingtin to control PEA levels does not depend on the length of the polyglutamine repeat that determines the age of onset of Huntington's disease. Considering the proposed role of huntingtin in the regulation of gene expression [49], this result suggests that increased PEA levels measured here might not be due to a direct involvement of huntingtin in PEA metabolism, but rather due to huntingtin-mediated impairment of transcription of key molecular steps controlling PEA levels (e.g. increased expression of enzymes producing PEA or decreased expression of enzymes inactivating PEA) [50]. We also found that α-synuclein expression increased PEA levels by ∼2 fold, suggesting that the metabolism of this signaling lipid might also be impaired in patients with Parkinson's disease carrying this mutation, as well as mice models carrying this mutation. To our knowledge, no such measurement has been reported, even though α-synuclein is known to affect lipid metabolism [51], [38].
The molecular steps occurring between the presence of huntingtin and α-synuclein in yeast, and a change in PEA metabolism remain to be determined, since performing these experiments in yeast strains lacking Spo14 and Yju3 did not prevent the effects of these pathogenic proteins, suggesting that they regulate the expression of other proteins. Here, two points can be made. First, it is unlikely that the increase in PEA levels induced by Htt25Q, Htt103Q and α-synuclein results from the down-regulation of a PEA inactivating enzymes, since we found that the genetic mutation of YJU3 leads to a 49% reduction in PEA hydrolysis without increasing PEA levels (compare Fig 5a and Figure S1). Second, the molecular mechanism involved in these changes in PEA metabolism could be dissected out by using combinations of the forward and reverse yeast genetic approaches described here.
In summary, identifying the molecular steps that control the production and inactivation of signaling lipids is essential for understanding their biological functions and for developing new therapeutic approaches. We found that S. cerevisiae produce and inactivate PEA, and identified several yeast genes involved in its production and inactivation. PEA metabolism in S. cerevisiae was affected by heterologous expression of mammalian proteins involved in Huntington's disease and Parkinson's disease, suggesting that PEA signaling is affected in those conditions. Thus, our results provide proof-of-concept for the use of reverse and forward yeast genetics to gain a genome-wide understanding of the molecular steps in PEA metabolism.
Materials and Methods
Materials
All solvents were of analytical grade. URB597, MAFP, 2-AG, and [2H5]-2-AG were from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI), PMSF, trypsin, chemotrypsin, and Streptomyces griseus proteases were from Sigma (St Louis, MO). [3H]-PEA (radioactively labeled on the ethanolamine) was from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO) and the NIDA drug supply system. N-AEs and [2H4]-N-AEs were synthesized in our laboratory as previously described [35]. Briefly, acyl chlorides were mixed in dry CHCl3 with ethanolamine or [2H4]-ethanolamine, and vigorously mixed at room temperature for 30 min. The resulting solutions were extracted three times with water (GC-MS grade) and the organic layers dried under nitrogen to afford the N-AEs and [2H4]-N-AEs, all of which were subsequently purified by solid-phase extraction. The nature and purity of the N-AEs and [2H4]-N-AEs were confirmed by TLC and GC-MS.
Yeast Culture and Homogenate Preparation
Wild-type S. cerevisiae cells and mutated yeast strains MATa (BY4741) were maintained on YPD Petri dishes. Some wild-type yeast were transformed with pYES2-Htt25Q-GFP5, pYES2-Htt103Q-GFP5 or pYES2-α-synuclein-GFP5 using the lithium acetate method and were maintained on plates containing synthetic complete media lacking uracil (SC-Ura). Similar transformations were performed in spo14Δ and yju3Δ yeast strains. Htt103Q is a galactose (GAL)-inducible, FLAG- and GFP-tagged construct encoding the first 17 amino acids of Htt fused to a polyQ tract of 103 glutamines, longer than the threshold for Huntington disease pathogenesis. The spo14Δ and yju3Δ yeast strains were also transformed with plasmids that express Spo14 and Yju3 (or empty vector), respectively, for reintroduction of the gene of interest. All these expressing strains were grown in SC-Ura media containing raffinose, instead of glucose, and that media replaced by galactose containing media for an overnight induction. Respective yeast strains grown at saturation were recovered by centrifugation (1300×g, 10 min, 4°C) and rinsed twice with PBS. Aliquots were then added to glass vials containing glass beads (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and vigorously shaken for 15 min (4°C), allowing for through cell disruption, before determining protein content.
HEK Cell Culture and Homogenate Preparation
HEK cells were expanded in MEM supplemented with 1 mM glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM NaHCO3, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 10% FBS. Confluent cells in 100 mm dishes were rinsed once with PBS, lysed in 1 ml of ice-cold Hepes (250 mM) – Sucrose (10 mM) buffer (pH 7.4) and homogenized on ice using a Dounce tissue homogenizer.
eCBs and N-AEs Quantification by GC/MS
eCBs and N-AEs amounts in yeast were quantified as previously described [35]. Briefly, freshly obtained yeast homogenates (3 mg of protein in PBS buffer, except for Figure 1) were added to 10 ml of ice-cold CHCl3 containing deuterated standards (200 pmol of [2H4]-anandamide, [2H4]-DEA, [2H4]-HEA, [2H4]-OEA, [2H4]-PEA, [2H4]-SEA and [2H5]-2-AG). Folch extraction was performed by adding ice-cold CH3OH (5 ml) and PBS (total volume of 5 ml). The mixture was vigorously shaken and sonicated (5 min at 4°C) for thorough lipid extraction. Following centrifugation (5 min at 800×g), the organic phase was recovered into a glass vial and dried under nitrogen. The residue was dissolved in CHCl3 (2 ml) and partially purified by solid-phase extraction using silica and ethyl acetate-acetone (1∶1) as eluent. Eluates were then dried under nitrogen, derivatized using BSTFA (50 min, 55°C), and stored in hexane at −20°C until CI-GC/MS analysis. Calibration curves for eCBs and N-AEs quantification were built following the same procedure (except for the absence of yeast homogenate).
[3H]-PEA Hydrolysis
Yeast homogenates (60 µg of protein in 400 µl) or HEK cells homogenate (20 µg of protein in 400 µl) were added to silanized glass tubes containing either 0.5 µl of drug in DMSO or DMSO alone (0.1%, control). Hydrolysis was initiated by the addition of [3H]-PEA (100 µl, 70,000 dpm) in Tris.HCl containing 0.1% fatty acid-free BSA. All additions were done using silanized pipette tips. Tubes were incubated for 20 min in a shaking water bath at 37°C. Tubes containing buffer only were used as control for chemical hydrolysis (blank), the value of which was systematically subtracted. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 2 ml of ice-cold CH3OH∶CHCl3 (1∶1) and the hydrophilic products of the hydrolysis extracted by vigorous mixing and subsequent centrifugation at 800×g (10 min). One ml of the upper layer was recovered, mixed with Ecoscint (4 ml) and the radioactivity therein determined by liquid scintillation. Under these conditions, using yeast homogenates, control and blank values were 1078±32 and 410±19 dpm, respectively (values from four experiments, mean±SEM).
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Genetic Modification of PEA Production and Inactivation in Yeast
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005942.s001
(0.01 MB PDF)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Flaviano Giorgini and Vicente Sancenon for help with preparing yeast stocks, S. Ordway and G. Howard at the J. David Gladstone Institutes for editorial assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: GGM PJM NS. Performed the experiments: GGM. Analyzed the data: GGM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AS PJM. Wrote the paper: GGM PJM NS.
References
- 1. Di Marzo V (2008) Targeting the endocannabinoid system: to enhance or reduce? Nat Rev Drug Discov 7: 438–455.
- 2. Howlett AC, Barth F, Bonner TI, Cabral G, Casellas P, et al. (2002) International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors. Pharmacological Reviews 54: 161–202.
- 3. Lo Verme J, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, Piomelli D (2005) The search for the palmitoylethanolamide receptor. Life Sci 77: 1685–1698.
- 4. Mackie K, Stella N (2006) Cannabinoid receptors and endocannabinoids: evidence for new players. AAPS J 8: E298–E306.
- 5. Stella N, Piomelli D (2001) Receptor-dependent formation of endogenous cannabinoids in cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 425: 189–196.
- 6. Walter L, Franklin A, Witting A, Moller T, Stella N (2002) Astrocytes in Culture Produce Anandamide and Other Acylethanolamides. J Biol Chem 277: 20869–20876.
- 7. Liu J, Wang L, Harvey-White J, Osei-Hyiaman D, Razdan R, et al. (2006) A biosynthetic pathway for anandamide. PNAS 103: 13345–13350.
- 8. Simon GM, Cravatt BF (2006) Endocannabinoid biosynthesis proceeding through glycerophospho-N-acyl ethanolamine and a role for a/b-hydrolase 4 in this pathway. J Biol Chem 281: 26465–26472.
- 9. Okamoto Y, Morishita J, Tsuboi K, Tonai T, Ueda N (2004) Molecular Characterization of a Phospholipase D Generating Anandamide and Its Congeners. J Biol Chem 279: 5298–5305.
- 10. Hashimotodani Y, Ohno-Shosaku T, Tsubokawa H, Ogata H, Emoto K, et al. (2005) Phospholipase Cbeta serves as a coincidence detector through its Ca2+ dependency for triggering retrograde endocannabinoid signal. Neuron 45: 257–268.
- 11. Maejima T, Oka S, Hashimotodani Y, Ohno-Shosaku T, Aiba A, et al. (2005) Synaptically driven endocannabinoid release requires Ca2+-assisted metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 to phospholipase Cbeta4 signaling cascade in the cerebellum. J Neurosci 25: 6826–6835.
- 12. Bisogno T, Howell F, Williams G, Minassi A, Cascio MG, et al. (2003) Cloning of the first sn1-DAG lipases points to the spatial and temporal regulation of endocannabinoid signaling in the brain. J Cell Biol 163: 463–468.
- 13. Bisogno T, Melck D, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V (1999) Phosphatidic acid as the biosynthetic precursor of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol in intact mouse neuroblastoma cells stimulated with ionomycin. J Neurochem 72: 2113–2119.
- 14. Leung D, Saghatelian A, Simon GM, Cravatt BF (2006) Inactivation of N-Acyl Phosphatidylethanolamine Phospholipase D Reveals Multiple Mechanisms for the Biosynthesis of Endocannabinoids. Biochemistry 45: 4720–4726.
- 15. McKinney MK, Cravatt BF (2005) Structure and function of fatty acid amide hydrolase. Annual Review of Biochemistry 74: 411–432.
- 16. Tsuboi K, Sun YX, Okamoto Y, Araki N, Tonai T, et al. (2005) Molecular characterization of N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase, a novel member of the choloylglycine hydrolase family with structural and functional similarity to acid ceramidase. J Biol Chem 280: 11082–11092.
- 17. Weber A, Ni J, Ling KHJ, Acheampong A, Tang-Liu DDS, et al. (2004) Formation of prostamides from anandamide in FAAH knockout mice analyzed by HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Lipid Research 45: 757–763.
- 18. Hampson AJ, Hill WA, Zan-Phillips M, Makriyannis A, Leung E, et al. (1995) Anandamide hydroxylation by brain lipoxygenase:metabolite structures and potencies at the cannabinoid receptor. Biochim Biophys Acta 1259: 173–179.
- 19. Yu M, Ives D, Ramesha CS (1997) Synthesis of Prostaglandin E2 Ethanolamide from Anandamide by Cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem 272: 21181–21186.
- 20. Karlsson M, Contreras JA, Hellman U, Tornqvist H, Holm C (1997) cDNA cloning, tissue distribution, and identification of the catalytic triad of monoglyceride lipase. Evolutionary relationship to esterases, lysophospholipases, and haloperoxidases. The Journal of biological chemistry 272: 27218–27223.
- 21. Dinh TP, Carpenter D, Leslie FM, Freund TF, Katona I, et al. (2002) Brain monoglyceride lipase participating in endocannabinoid inactivation. PNAS 99: 10819–10824.
- 22. Moody JS, Kozak KR, Ji C, Marnett LJ (2001) Selective oxygenation of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol by leukocyte-type 12-lipoxygenase. Biochemistry 40: 861–866.
- 23. Kozak KR, Gupta RA, Moody JS, Ji C, Boeglin WE, et al. (2002) 15-Lipoxygenase metabolism of 2-arachidonylglycerol. Generation of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonist. J Biol Chem 277: 23278–23286.
- 24. Kozak KR, Rowlinson SW, Marnett LJ (2000) Oxygenation of the endocannabinoid, 2-arachidonylglycerol, to glyceryl prostaglandins by cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem 275: 33744–33749.
- 25. Blankman JL, Simon GM, Cravatt BF (2007) A Comprehensive Profile of Brain Enzymes that Hydrolyze the Endocannabinoid 2-Arachidonoylglycerol. Chemistry & Biology (Cambridge, MA, United States) 14: 1347–1356.
- 26. Cravatt BF, Demarest K, Patricelli MP, Bracey MH, Giang DK, et al. (2001) Supersensitivity to anandamide and enhanced endogenous cannabinoid signaling in mice lacking fatty acid amide hydrolase. PNAS 98: 9371–9376.
- 27. Lichtman AH, Hawkins EG, Griffin G, Cravatt BF (2002) Pharmacological Activity of Fatty Acid Amides Is Regulated, but Not Mediated, by Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase in Vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 73–79.
- 28. Muccioli GG, Stella N (2008) Microglia produce and hydrolyze palmitoylethanolamide. Neuropharmacology 54: 16–22.
- 29. Phelps C, Gburcik V, Suslova E, Dudek P, Forafonov F, et al. (2006) Fungi and animals may share a common ancestor to nuclear receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 7077–7081.
- 30. Maccarrone M, Cartoni A, Parolaro D, Margonelli A, Massi P, et al. (2002) Cannabimimetic activity, binding, and degradation of stearoylethanolamide within the mouse central nervous system. Mol Cell Neurosci 21: 126–140.
- 31. Fu J, Gaetani S, Oveisi F, Lo Verme J, Serrano A, et al. (2003) Oleylethanolamide regulates feeding and body weight through activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-α. Nature 425: 90–93.
- 32. Hanus L, Gopher A, Almog S, Mechoulam R (1993) Two new unsaturated fatty acid ethanolamides in brain that bind to the cannabinoid receptor. J Med Chem 36: 3032–3034.
- 33. Felder CC, Briley EM, Axelrod J, Simpson JT, Mackie K, et al. (1993) Anandamide, an endogenous cannabimimetic eicosanoid, binds to the cloned human cannabinoid receptor and stimulates receptor-mediated signal transduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90: 7656–7660.
- 34. Pertwee R, Griffin G, Hanus L, Mechoulam R (1994) Effects of two endogenous fatty acid ethanolamides on mouse vasa deferentia. Eur J Pharmacol 259: 115–120.
- 35. Muccioli GG, Stella N (2008) An optimized GC-MS method detects nanomolar amounts of anandamide in mouse brain. Anal Biochem 373: 220–228.
- 36. Kim TD, Ryu HJ, Cho HI, Yang CH, Kim J (2000) Thermal Behavior of Proteins: Heat-Resistant Proteins and Their Heat-Induced Secondary Structural Changes. Biochemistry 39: 14839–14846.
- 37. Goparaju SK, Ueda N, Yamaguchi H, Yamamoto S (1998) Anandamide amidohydrolase reacting with 2-arachidonoylglycerol, another cannabinoid receptor ligand. FEBS Letters 422: 69–73.
- 38. Willingham S, Outeiro TF, DeVit MJ, Lindquist SL, Muchowski PJ (2003) Yeast genes that enhance the toxicity of a mutant huntingtin fragment or alpha-synuclein. Science 302: 1769–1772.
- 39. Franklin A, Parmentier-Batteur S, Walter L, Greenberg DA, Stella N (2003) Palmitoylethanolamide increases after focal cerebral ischemia and potentiates microglial cell motility. J Neurosci 23: 7767–7775.
- 40. Calignano A, La Rana G, Giuffrida A, Piomelli D (1998) Control of pain initiation by endogenous cannabinoids. Nature 394: 277–281.
- 41. Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis LF, Sepe NF, Buono A (1996) Biosynthesis of anandamide and related acylethanolamides in mouse J774 macrophages and N18 neuroblastoma cells. Biochem J 316: 977–984.
- 42. Bisogno T, Maurelli S, Melck D, De Petrocellis L, Di Marzo V (1997) Biosynthesis, uptake, and degradation of anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide in leukocytes. J Biol Chem 272: 3315–3323.
- 43. Lambert DM, Vandevoorde S, Jonsson KO, Fowler CJ (2002) The palmitoylethanolamide family: A new class of anti-inflammatory agents? Current Medicinal Chemistry 9: 663–674.
- 44. Daum G, Lees ND, Bard M, Dickson R (1998) Biochemistry, cell biology and molecular biology of lipids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 1471–1510.
- 45. Martin CE, Oh CS, Kandasamy P, Chellapa R, Vemula M (2002) Yeast desaturases. Biochem Soc Trans 30: 1080–1082.
- 46. Oh CS, Toke DA, Mandala S, Martin CE (1997) ELO2 and ELO3, homologues of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ELO1 gene, function in fatty acid elongation and are required for sphingolipid formation. J Biol Chem 272: 17376–17384.
- 47. Chapman KD (2004) Occurrence, metabolism, and prospective functions of N-acylethanolamines in plants. Prog Lipid Res 43: 302–327.
- 48. Matias I, Bisogno T, Melck D, Vandenbulcke F, Verger-Bocquet M, et al. (2001) Evidence for an endocannabinoid system in the central nervous system of the leech Hirudo medicinalis. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 87: 145–159.
- 49. Sugars KL, Rubinsztein DC (2003) Transcriptional abnormalities in Huntington disease. Trends Genet 19: 233–238.
- 50. Valenza M, Rigamonti D, Goffredo D, Zuccato C, Fenu S, et al. (2005) Dysfunction of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in Huntington's disease. J Neurosci 25: 9932–9939.
- 51. Outeiro TF, Lindquist S (2003) Yeast cells provide insight into alpha-synuclein biology and pathobiology. Science 302: 1772–1775.