Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article

Publisher's Note: Error in Abstract

Posted by PLOS_ONE_Group on 20 May 2013 at 04:51 GMT

There is an error in the following sentence of the abstract:
"We found no significant effect on adherence by VAS>95% (risk ratio [RR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89, 1.29; p = 0.542; reported missed doses (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.87, 1.16; p>0.999) or number of pharmacy refills (mean difference [MD] 0.1, 95% CI: -0.23, 0.43; p = 0.617."

The number 0.23 is incorrect. The correct number is -0.23.

No competing interests declared.