Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeTaxonomy of giant varanids
Posted by JohnScanlon on 01 Oct 2009 at 00:10 GMT
This paper seems to have missed a good opportunity to resolve the nomenclatural status of _Varanus hooijeri_ (Pleistocene of Timor) and _V. warburtonensis_ (Pleistocene of Central Australia, previously synonymised with _V. priscus_). Can one or both of these names be applied to the intermediate-sized _Varanus_ 'sp.' from these areas? The available names are not even mentioned!
Also, once more the incorrect ending has been used in _Varanus 'prisca'_. It's _priscus_, guys!
RE: Taxonomy of giant varanids
Scott_Hocknull replied to JohnScanlon on 01 Oct 2009 at 06:14 GMT
Hi John,
Thanks for your comments. Time and comparative material hindered me from doing a more indepth review. I'm currently working on the rest of the 'Megalania' material and will hopefully get this out soonish. I agree, V. warburtonensis could be a valid name for the intermediate taxon, however, it will more likely be a nomen dubium. Hence why we didn't push to erect a name for the Timor vertebrae. V. hooijeri wasn't available for me to look at.
As for priscus/prisca, I originally had priscus in the paper, however, post-review I used prisca - using the latest taxonomic work by Head et al (2009), [14] in the paper.
From Head et al 2009, P446 "We also demonstrate that Megalania is firmly nested within the clade Varanus, and refer to this taxon as V. prisca henceforth (see below for further discussion)."
P447 "The correct species name is Varanus
prisca, although several authors have adopted an
alternative, incorrect spelling (priscus: e.g. Lydekker,
1888)."
It was my original consideration that by changing Megalania prisca to Varanus you must change prisca to priscus to form the correct latin arrangement. Like Trachydosaurus rugosus to Tiliqua rugosa.
More than open to opinion and suggestion or specific latin arrangements.
Regards,
Scott.
RE: RE: Taxonomy of giant varanids
Jahn_Hornung replied to Scott_Hocknull on 18 Jun 2010 at 19:13 GMT
Hi,
I think the correct spelling of "Megalania" prisca is unambigously regulated by ICZN Art. 31.2:
"Agreement in gender. A species-group name, if it is or ends in a Latin or latinized adjective or participle in the nominative singular, must agree in gender with the generic name with which it is at any time combined."
If transferred to Varanus, the adjective prisca has to agree in genderwith the former. Varanus is male (e.g. V. niloticus, V. exanthematicus).
Therefore, in my opinion V. priscus would be correct.
Regards,
Jahn