Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species and Giardia duodenalis from Symptomatic Cambodian Children

  • Catrin E. Moore ,

    catrin.moore@ndm.ox.ac.uk

    Affiliations Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, Cambodia-Oxford Medical Research Unit, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia, Modernising Medical Microbiology Consortium, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Kristin Elwin,

    Affiliations Cryptosporidium Reference Unit, Public Health Wales Microbiology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom, Swansea University Medical School, Grove Building, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom

  • Nget Phot,

    Affiliation Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia

  • Chanthou Seng,

    Affiliation Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia

  • Saroeun Mao,

    Affiliation Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia

  • Kuong Suy,

    Affiliation Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia

  • Varun Kumar,

    Affiliation Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia

  • Johanna Nader,

    Affiliation Clinical Sciences Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Rachel Bousfield,

    Affiliation Microbiology Department, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom

  • Sanuki Perera,

    Affiliation Modernising Medical Microbiology Consortium, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • J. Wendi Bailey,

    Affiliation Clinical Sciences Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Nicholas J. Beeching,

    Affiliations Clinical Sciences Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Nicholas P. J. Day,

    Affiliations Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Christopher M. Parry,

    Affiliations Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, Cambodia-Oxford Medical Research Unit, Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

  • Rachel M. Chalmers

    Affiliations Cryptosporidium Reference Unit, Public Health Wales Microbiology, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom, Swansea University Medical School, Grove Building, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, United Kingdom

Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species and Giardia duodenalis from Symptomatic Cambodian Children

  • Catrin E. Moore, 
  • Kristin Elwin, 
  • Nget Phot, 
  • Chanthou Seng, 
  • Saroeun Mao, 
  • Kuong Suy, 
  • Varun Kumar, 
  • Johanna Nader, 
  • Rachel Bousfield, 
  • Sanuki Perera
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

In a prospective study, 498 single faecal samples from children aged under 16 years attending an outpatient clinic in the Angkor Hospital for Children, northwest Cambodia, were examined for Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts using microscopy and molecular assays.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 2.2% (11/498) of samples using microscopy and in 7.7% (38/498) with molecular tests. Giardia duodenalis cysts were detected in 18.9% (94/498) by microscopy and 27.7% (138/498) by molecular tests; 82% of the positive samples (by either method) were from children aged 1–10 years. Cryptosporidium hominis was the most common species of Cryptosporidium, detected in 13 (34.2%) samples, followed by Cryptosporidium meleagridis in 9 (23.7%), Cryptosporidium parvum in 8 (21.1%), Cryptosporidium canis in 5 (13.2%), and Cryptosporidium suis and Cryptosporidium ubiquitum in one sample each. Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum positive samples were subtyped by sequencing the GP60 gene: C. hominis IaA16R6 and C. parvum IIeA7G1 were the most abundant subtypes. Giardia duodenalis was typed using a multiplex real-time PCR targeting assemblages A and B. Assemblage B (106; 76.8% of all Giardia positive samples) was most common followed by A (12.3%) and mixed infections (5.1%). Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium were malnutrition (AOR 9.63, 95% CI 1.67–55.46), chronic medical diagnoses (AOR 4.51, 95% CI 1.79–11.34) and the presence of birds in the household (AOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.16–7.73); specifically C. hominis (p = 0.03) and C. meleagridis (p<0.001) were associated with the presence of birds. The use of soap was protective against Giardia infection (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.95).

Conclusions/Significance

This is the first report to describe the different Cryptosporidium species and subtypes and Giardia duodenalis assemblages in Cambodian children. The variety of Cryptosporidium species detected indicates both anthroponotic and zoonotic transmission in this population. Interventions to improve sanitation, increase hand washing after defecation and before preparing food and promote drinking boiled water may reduce the burden of these two parasites.

Author Summary

The parasites Cryptosporidium and Giardia frequently cause diarrhea in children worldwide. They can be transmitted from animals to humans and between humans, either through direct contact, from sewage, or by contamination of food and water. The importance of these infections in Cambodian children is unknown. Animals are an essential part of life in Southeast Asia with livestock as well as domestic animals living in close proximity to humans. We previously conducted a prospective study to determine the intestinal parasites causing disease in symptomatic children attending hospital in Siem Reap, Northwestern Cambodia. This study examines these two parasites in more detail using molecular methods which provide better detection and are more discriminating. We were able to determine the different”strains” of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and, along with risk factor data, concluded that most of the infections were spread between people or within households suggesting that public health programmes should concentrate on improved sanitation, community handwashing initiatives and better food and water hygiene practices.

Introduction

The protozoan genera Cryptosporidium and Giardia are important causes of diarrhoea worldwide [24]. Estimates of the prevalence of infection with these parasites vary enormously due to difficulties in diagnosis and reporting, and this is a particular problem in developing countries [5]. Cryptosporidiosis infection causes diarrhoea and vomiting, abdominal cramps, loss of appetite and low-grade fever. Giardiasis infection is associated with diarrhoea, stomach cramps, bloating, nausea, fatigue and weight loss during chronic infections [6]. Chronic infections with these pathogens contribute to malnutrition, poor growth and subsequent lack of achievement. Both diseases are more common in children than adults. Cryptosporidium and Giardia are parasites of humans, domestic animals and wild vertebrates, and the oocysts and cysts shed in the faeces are ubiquitous in the environment. Transmission occurs through anthroponotic, zoonotic, foodborne and waterborne routes [710]. The relative importance of transmission routes for each parasite is unclear due to the lack of sensitive tools to detect and then determine the species or subspecies during infection and in the environment.

There are more than twenty seven known Cryptosporidium species. The most common causing disease in humans are Cryptosporidium parvum, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, C. felis, C. canis and C. ubiquitum [11]. The species distribution varies geographically and temporally. In most countries C. parvum and/or C. hominis are the predominant human infective species. The only known Giardia species causing human disease is Giardia duodenalis (also known as Giardia lamblia and Giardia intestinalis). Giardia duodenalis is separated into assemblages identified originally by enzyme electrophoretic profiles but which are now determined by molecular analyses. There are seven assemblages (A-H), many of which are host adapted, A and B being the ones most frequently found in humans [12, 13].

Few data are available on the different Cryptosporidium species and G. duodenalis assemblages causing disease in children in Cambodia. Routine diagnostic facilities do not provide this level of differentiation. Giardia duodenalis can be diagnosed using direct microscopy of a wet preparation of faeces, with or without concentration. Cryptosporidium species are usually detected by direct microscopy of a cold Zeihl Neelson (ZN) faecal smear. These direct microscopy methods are widely used in both developed and developing countries but are insensitive. Antigen-detecting enzyme immunoassays (EIA) can also be used directly on faeces. Nucleic acid amplification methods, including real-time PCR assays, increase diagnostic sensitivity and also provide the opportunity for genotyping for epidemiological purpose and allow a better understanding of the routes of transmission [14].

In this study we determined the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in the faeces of 498 symptomatic children attending the Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, North Western Cambodia. In addition we used PCR-based methods to genotype the parasites.

Methods

Study setting

This is a sub-study of a prospective investigation of faecal parasites in children attending Angkor Hospital for Children (AHC) in Siem Reap, North-Western Cambodia. AHC is a 50-bedded, charitably-funded paediatric hospital, providing free intensive, surgical and general medical care to children <16 years of age from Siem Reap town and surrounding provinces. The main study has been previously reported [1].

Ethical consideration and treatment

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at AHC, the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC 12–12) and the Public Health Wales Research Risk Review Committee.

Ethics statement

The study was explained to patients and their caregivers, and informed consent was confirmed by the caregiver’s signature or a witnessed thumbprint. The attending physician recorded clinical and demographic information on a standard form together with potential risk factors for infection [1].

Clinical, demographic and epidemiological data collection

Children attending the out-patient clinic or admitted to hospital between 3rd April 2012 and 29th June 2012 were eligible for inclusion in the study if the treating doctor had requested a faecal parasite examination because of diarrhoea, abdominal pain, clinical evidence of anaemia or malnutrition.

Laboratory methods

Faecal samples were examined within one hour of receipt by direct microscopy of a wet preparation [15] and a faecal concentration (FC) preparation using the Evergreen faecal parasite concentrator (Evergreen Scientific, Los Angeles, California) [1]. Giardia cysts were detected by examination of both the direct and concentrated samples and Cryptosporidium oocysts using a ZN stained smear prepared from the concentrated deposit [16]. The faeces were then stored at -80°C and later shipped on dry ice to the University of Oxford.

A total of 498 of the original 865 patient samples were selected for this sub-study. The samples chosen included all samples known to be direct microscopy-positive for Cryptosporidium and Giardia and 395 samples which were direct microscopy negative. Three samples (one positive for Cryptosporidium, one positive for Giardia and one negative) were included in duplicate to test the reproducibility of all methods. DNA extraction was performed on the chosen samples in Oxford and the DNA was stored at -80°C until shipped on dry ice to Swansea where it was stored at -20°C prior to analysis.

Molecular methods

DNA extraction.

Frozen faecal samples were thawed at room temperature and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, UK) with modifications to increase the yield of DNA [17]. Briefly, 200μl of stool was added to 1ml of Buffer ASL, vortexed until the sample was homogenized. Samples underwent five cycles of immersion in liquid nitrogen for two minutes followed by heating at 95°C for two minutes, then samples were lysed at 95°C for ten minutes, cooled and vortexed for 15 seconds, followed by centrifugation at 13,000g for one minute. The supernatant was removed and the protocol was followed as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Identification and characterization of Cryptosporidium species.

To identify the Cryptosporidium species two assays were used. The samples were first screened using the 18S (SSU rRNA gene) real time PCR as described by Hadfield et al. [18]; positive samples then underwent a multiplex real-time PCR for the specific identification of C. parvum and C. hominis [18]. Primers used were specific for the Lib13 locus of C. parvum, as described previously [18], and the A135 locus of C. hominis (forward primer (CRUAF) 5’-CACCAAAGATAATGGATGTTGTTGAT-3’, reverse primer (CRUARb) 5’-AATTGCTTCGACATCGTCCAAT-3’ and probe (CRUAT) 6-FAM CAAACGAGCTATTAAAGG MGB-NFQ (personal communication, RC).

The PCR conditions were as described previously [18] and the post run analysis was performed using the Rotorgene 6000 software program, version 1.7 (Corbett Research, UK). Samples positive by the 18S assay but negative for C. parvum or C. hominis were sequenced. Samples positive for C. parvum and C. hominis by the multiplex assay were subtyped by sequencing part of the gp60 gene [19].

Identification of Giardia duodenalis assemblages.

Two PCRs were performed. First a screening assay based on the beta-giardin gene (“GDD” assay) was performed on all samples using forward (BGF2) 5’-GAGGCCCTCAAGAGCCTGAA-3’, and reverse primers (BG2R2) 5’-ACACTCGACGAGCTTCGTGTT-3’ with probe (BGT2) VIC-ATCGAGAAGGAGACGATCGC-MGB-NFQ (personal communication, RC) using conditions described previously [17]. Samples positive in the GDD screening assay underwent a multiplex real time PCR based on the tpi locus, specific for assemblages A and B [17] and sequencing of the GDD PCR products.

Sequencing

The PCR products for Cryptosporidium species and Giardia species were purified using 1.8μl Agencort Ampure XP beads (Becman Coulter, UK) per 1μl of PCR product. Samples were mixed, incubated and transferred to a magnetic holder, the supernatant removed, the beads washed twice with 200μl of 80% ethanol. The ethanol was then removed and the DNA/beads dried. The beads were eluted in 26μl Tris-EDTA buffer, resuspended, returned to the magnetic holder and 25μl of cleaned DNA was removed.

The sequencing reaction contained 1–3ng of DNA, 1.75μl sequence dilution buffer, 0.5μl BigDye, 0.5μl of forward or reverse primer (18S for Cryptosporidium species and GDD for Giardia species) with water up to 10μl. The cycling conditions were: initial denaturation of 96°C for 2 minutes followed by 30 cycles consisting: 96°C for 10 seconds, 50°C for 5 seconds and 60°C for 3 minutes.

The products for sequencing were purified using 10μl of Agencourt CleanSEQ (Beckman Coulter, UK) beads per reaction, washed with 85% ethanol, placed on a magnetic strip and the supernatant was discarded. The beads were then washed twice with 85% ethanol, the samples were air dried and the resulting product was eluted in 0.1M EDTA. The sequencing reactions were performed on an ABI3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, ThermoFisher, UK). Consensus sequences for each strain were prepared using the Genious 8.0.3 software (Biomatters Ltd.) and compared with the published sequences available in GenBank using BLAST.

Statistical analysis

The sensitivity and specificity of the detection by microscopy of each parasite was calculated using the PCR result as the nominated gold standard. Study participants were subdivided into five age groups for analysis: neonates (≤28 days); infants (29 days-<1 year); 1–5 years; 6–10 years and 11–16 years. A chi-squared test or Fisher’s Exact test was used to examine the association between categorical variables. The association of potential risk factors with Cryptosporidium species and Giardia duodenalis detection was analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods using an odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13.1 (Stata Corporation; College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species

When the 498 samples were examined by microscopy Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 11/498 (2.2%) and Giardia cysts in 94/498 (18.9%). The additional use of the molecular methods significantly increased the total number of samples identified as positive for Cryptosporidium spp to 38/498 (7.7%) (p<0.001) and for Giardia duodenalis to 143/498 (28.7%) (p<0.001) (Table 1). There was agreement between the results of microscopy and molecular detection in 471/498 (94.6%) samples for Cryptosporidium spp and 438/498 (88.0%) for G. duodenalis. Of the 38 samples positive by either method for Cryptosporidium species, none were positive by microscopy alone, 11 (28.9%) were positive by both methods and 27 (71.1%) were positive by PCR alone. For 143 samples positive by either method for Giardia, 11 (7.7%) were positive by microscopy alone, 49 (34.3%) were positive by PCR alone, and 83 (58.0%) were positive by both microscopy and PCR (Table 1). All duplicate samples were exactly the same on both occasions.

Cryptosporidium species identification

Six Cryptosporidium species were detected (Table 2). Of the 38 Cryptosporidium positive samples, 13 (34%) were C. hominis with the most prevalent being C. hominis subtype IaA16R6 (23.1% of all C. hominis); 9 (23.7%) were C. meleagridis; 8 (21.1%) were C. parvum, with subtype IIeA7G1 found in 50% of the C. parvum samples; 5 (13.2%) were C. canis; and single positives found for C. suis and C. ubiquitum. One sample was positive with a mixture of C. hominis and C. parvum so the subtypes failed to be determined.

thumbnail
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate risk factor analyses for infections caused Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis, data available in S2 Table.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004822.t002

Giardia duodenalis sequencing

Only two Giardia duodenalis assemblages were found in 132 samples tested despite all possible assemblages being sought (Table 3). The most common was assemblage B, found in 106 (80.3%) samples followed by assemblage A, found in 17 (12.9%). A total of 9 (6.8%) samples were positive for both assemblages A and B. Seventeen samples amplified at the beta giardin gene, but were not positive with the tpi typing PCR, so sequencing of the beta giardin gene was used to identify the assemblage; all these amplicons were assemblage B.

thumbnail
Table 3. Cryptosporidium and Giardia PCR and sequencing results.

This excludes 11 samples that were positive for G. duodenalis by microscopy, but negative by PCR.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004822.t003

Clinical, demographic and epidemiological data

The risk factors for the presence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia species in the faeces of individual children were examined (Table 2, all data available in S2 Table). In the univariate analysis the risk factors for infection with Cryptosporidium were malnutrition (OR 4.84, 95% CI 2.00–11.70), wasting (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.55–10.99), chronic medical diagnoses (OR 5.40, 95% CI 2.31–12.63) and the presence of birds in the house (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.23–7.39). Malnutrition (AOR 9.63, 95% CI 1.67–55.46), chronic medical diagnoses (AOR 4.51, 95% CI 1.79–11.34) and the presence of birds (AOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.16–7.73) remained associated in the multivariate analysis. The associations with presence of birds and in particular chickens were examined further and significant associations were found with C. hominis and C. meleagridis (p = 0.03 and p<0.001 respectively) with birds but no significant association was found between the different Cryptosporidium species and the presence of chickens at the residence (S1 Table). For Giardia the use of soap was protective (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.95).

Discussion

This is the first detailed study of Cryptosporidium species and subtype and Giardia duodenalis assemblage distribution in symptomatic Cambodian children. The addition of molecular methods to standard microscopy increased the proportion of Cryptosporidium species detected from 1.4% to 7.7% of all faecal samples, with three quarters of positive samples only detected by PCR. Most of the Cryptosporidium species positives were detected in the 1–10 year age group with two thirds in the 1–5 years age group and one quarter in the 6–10 year age group. The proportion of samples positive for G. duodenalis increased from 11.2% to 28.7% using molecular methods in addition to microscopy and one third were positive by PCR alone. In contrast to the Cryptosporidium species, most of the Giardia infections were detected in children aged 1–10 years, with 45% in the 1–5 year age group and 42% in the 6–10 year age group. Similar increased detection rates were described recently using multiplex PCR methods targeting Cryptosporidium species and G. duodenalis, although the prevalence was lower in the multiplex reaction than described here [20]. Other detailed reports from Cambodia have not examined faecal samples using PCR based techniques, therefore their prevalence detection rates are lower than observed in our study [2123].

Six different Cryptosporidium species were found in this study in Cambodian children. The most common was C. hominis, an anthroponotic species known to be prevalent in developing countries [24]. The most common gp60 C. hominis subtype families previously reported in children in developing countries are Ia, Ib, Id and Ie [2426]. In other studies in Malawi, Kenya, India and Australia IbA9G3 was common and IbA10G2 was common in South Africa, Peru, the UK and USA [27]. In contrast, subtypes IaA14R3, IaA16R6, IdA17 and IfA19G1 were detected in this study. There are few other reports describing these subtypes, although two reports have linked IaA14R3 subtype to outbreaks in Scotland [28] and elsewhere in the UK [29]. IaA16R6 was the most common subtype in this study but has not previously been described. IdA17 has been described in Nigeria, Scotland and Mexico [26, 28, 30] and IfA19G1 has been detected in small numbers in Australia [31].

The other Cryptosporidium species detected in these Cambodian samples are zoonotic: C. parvum suggests an animal reservoir (most often ruminant livestock); C. meleagridis is associated with different avian species [32]; C. canis infects dogs; C. suis infects pigs; and C. ubiquitum has a broad host range [33]. No associations were observed between the Cryptosporidium species and the animal reservoir in this study but the case numbers were small. Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIa is the predominant subtype family in animals and humans worldwide and the IId subtype is reported frequently in Europe, Asia, Egypt and Australia [34]. The most widely distributed C. parvum subtype in industrialised countries is IIa15G2R1, with IIaA18G3R1 more common in Ireland [27]. All four of the C. parvum samples identified in this study were subtype IIeA7G1 which is rare; only a single strain has previously been described, from India [35]. Subtypes IIe and IIc are anthroponotic subtype families. IIeA7G1 was the most common subtype found in this study suggesting that anthroponotic transmission of C. parvum is important in Cambodian children. We also found nine patients with C. meleagridis, five patients with C. canis and one patient each with C. suis and C. ubiquitum. These species are also found in animals so while anthroponotic transmission of Cryptosporidium appears to be most important in children in Cambodia, there may also be a zoonotic reservoir of infection.

Only two G. duodenalis assemblages were present in these samples (Table 3). The most prevalent was assemblage B at 80%, with 13% assemblage A and 7% mixed A and B. The prevalence of assemblage B is consistent with previous data from India [36]. Giardia duodenalis assemblage B has previously been described as common in children [37]. Assemblages A and B are usually anthroponotically transmitted rather than from a zoonotic source, although dogs, cats and livestock have been associated with assemblage A [38]. The PCR testing strategy used in our study emphasizes the need to test samples with a number of typing methods. Although some samples that were positive using the beta giardin screening PCR, the tpi PCR method was unable to assign their assemblages and sequencing the beta giardin amplicons was used to determine the assemblages of 17 parasites, which were all assemblage B. Previous work showed the tpi assay to be sufficiently sensitive and specific so the reason is not known [19].

The study highlights the association of malnutrition, chronic medical diseases and the presence of domestic birds with Cryptosporidium infection. Giardia duodenalis infections were associated with not using soap, as described by others[39].

There are a number of study limitations. This analysis only used a subgroup of the larger prospective study [1] and so may not fully represent the disease burden and risk factors for Cryptosporidium and Giardia in the symptomatic children attending AHC. A small number of samples were positive for Giardia by microscopy but negative by PCR, as reported by other investigators [20, 40]. As both the DNA extraction and microscopy used a only a small sample of feces it is likely that by chance in some instances the parasite will be seen by microscopy but missed by PCR. The study included patients with symptoms but no asymptomatic controls. Some of the parasites may not be causing the child’s symptoms. We did not examine animals and so could not determine the distribution of zoonotic infections.

This study is the first to describe the anthroponotic and heterogeneous nature of Cryptosporidium species infecting children from North Western Cambodia. Cryptosporidium hominis was the most common species with four different subtypes, followed by C. meleagridis and C. parvum with a single subtype. The main G. duodenalis subtype was assemblage B. Further work is needed to fully describe the epidemiology of disease and the circulating subtypes of Cryptosporidium and G. duodenalis in Cambodia. This work reinforces the need for handwashing after defecation and the use of boiled water for consumption.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Associations between the Cryptosporidium species and the presence of domestic birds or chicken at the residence.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004822.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Raw data included in the risk factor analysis for Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis.

Key: presence = 1, absence = 0.

doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004822.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. William Housworth and Ngoun Chanpheaktra, the previous Director and Medical Director of Angkor Hospital for Children for their support and the clinical staff and staff of the microbiology laboratory. We thank Professors Tim Peto and Derrick Crook in the Modernising Medical Microbiology Group for their support. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and approved the final version of the paper.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CEM KE CMP RMC. Performed the experiments: CEM KE NP CS SM KS JN RB SP JWB. Analyzed the data: CEM KE RMC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JWB NJB NPJD RMC. Wrote the paper: CEM KE RB JWB NJB NPJD CMP RMC.

References

  1. 1. Moore CE, Nget P, Saroeun M, Kuong S, Chanthou S, Kumar V, et al. Intestinal parasite infections in symptomatic children attending hospital in siem reap, cambodia. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0123719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123719 pmid:25951607; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4423887.
  2. 2. Yoder JS, Harral C, Beach MJ, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Giardiasis surveillance—United States, 2006–2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010;59(6):15–25. pmid:20535095.
  3. 3. Yoder JS, Gargano JW, Wallace RM, Beach MJ, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Giardiasis surveillance—United States, 2009–2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012;61(5):13–23. pmid:22951494.
  4. 4. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60844-2 pmid:23680352.
  5. 5. Thompson RC. The zoonotic significance and molecular epidemiology of Giardia and giardiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2004;126(1–2):15–35. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.008 pmid:15567577.
  6. 6. Busatti HG, Santos JF, Gomes MA. The old and new therapeutic approaches to the treatment of giardiasis: where are we? Biologics. 2009;3:273–87. pmid:19707415; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2726062.
  7. 7. Baldursson S, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks—an update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011;45(20):6603–14. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.013 pmid:22048017.
  8. 8. Robertson LJ, Casaert S, Valdez-Nava Y, Ehsan MA, Claerebout E. Drying of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts to slides abrogates use of vital dyes for viability staining. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;96:68–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.11.001 pmid:24239946.
  9. 9. Xiao L, Hlavsa MC, Yoder J, Ewers C, Dearen T, Yang W, et al. Subtype analysis of Cryptosporidium specimens from sporadic cases in Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, and Iowa in 2007: widespread occurrence of one Cryptosporidium hominis subtype and case history of an infection with the Cryptosporidium horse genotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(9):3017–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00226-09 pmid:19587303; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2738111.
  10. 10. Santin M, Cortes Vecino JA, Fayer R. A large scale molecular study of Giardia duodenalis in horses from Colombia. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196(1–2):31–6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.02.006 pmid:23474231.
  11. 11. Chalmers RM, Robinson G, Elwin K, Hadfield SJ, Xiao L, Ryan U, et al. Cryptosporidium sp. rabbit genotype, a newly identified human pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(5):829–30. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081419 pmid:19402985; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2687022.
  12. 12. Xiao L, Fayer R. Molecular characterisation of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium and Giardia and assessment of zoonotic transmission. International Journal for Parasitology. 2008;38(11):1239–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.006. pmid:18479685
  13. 13. Feng Y, Xiao L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2011;24(1):110–40. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-10 pmid:21233509; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3021202.
  14. 14. Elwin K, Hadfield SJ, Robinson G, Chalmers RM. The epidemiology of sporadic human infections with unusual cryptosporidia detected during routine typing in England and Wales, 2000–2008. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(4):673–83. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811000860 pmid:21733255.
  15. 15. England PH. Investigation of Specimens other than Blood for Parasites. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations. http://www.hpa.org.uk/SMI/pdf: Public Health England; 2014.
  16. 16. Casemore DP, Armstrong M, Sands RL. Laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis. J Clin Pathol. 1985;38(12):1337–41. pmid:2416782; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC499488.
  17. 17. Elwin K, Fairclough HV, Hadfield SJ, Chalmers RM. Giardia duodenalis typing from stools: a comparison of three approaches to extracting DNA, and validation of a probe-based real-time PCR typing assay. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(Pt 1):38–44. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.066050–0 pmid:24085818.
  18. 18. Hadfield SJ, Robinson G, Elwin K, Chalmers RM. Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium spp. in human clinical samples by use of real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(3):918–24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01733-10 pmid:21177904; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3067739.
  19. 19. Alves M, Xiao L, Sulaiman I, Lal AA, Matos O, Antunes F. Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(6):2744–7. pmid:12791920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC156540.
  20. 20. Llewellyn S, Inpankaew T, Nery SV, Gray DJ, Verweij JJ, Clements AC, et al. Application of a multiplex quantitative PCR to assess prevalence and intensity of intestinal parasite infections in a controlled clinical trial. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(1):e0004380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004380 pmid:26820626; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4731196.
  21. 21. Chhakda T, Muth S, Socheat D, Odermatt P. Intestinal parasites in school-aged children in villages bordering Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006;37(5):859–64. pmid:17333726.
  22. 22. Yong TS, Chai JY, Sohn WM, Eom KS, Jeoung HG, Hoang EH, et al. Prevalence of intestinal helminths among inhabitants of Cambodia (2006–2011). Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52(6):661–6. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2014.52.6.661 pmid:25548418; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4277029.
  23. 23. Park SK, Kim DH, Deung YK, Kim HJ, Yang EJ, Lim SJ, et al. Status of intestinal parasite infections among children in Bat Dambang, Cambodia. Korean J Parasitol. 2004;42(4):201–3. pmid:15591838; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2717386.
  24. 24. Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):80–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.018 pmid:19358845.
  25. 25. Abu Samra N, Thompson PN, Jori F, Frean J, Poonsamy B, du Plessis D, et al. Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in diarrhoeic children from four provinces in South Africa. Zoonoses Public Health. 2013;60(2):154–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01507.x pmid:22712773.
  26. 26. Molloy SF, Smith HV, Kirwan P, Nichols RA, Asaolu SO, Connelly L, et al. Identification of a high diversity of Cryptosporidium species genotypes and subtypes in a pediatric population in Nigeria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;82(4):608–13. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09–0624 pmid:20348508; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2844578.
  27. 27. Fayer R, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis. 2 ed. USA: CRC Press; 2008.
  28. 28. Deshpande A, Alexander CL, Coyne M, Brownlie S, Smith-Palmer A, Jones BL. Molecular diversity of Scottish Cryptosporidium hominis isolates. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143(6):1219–24. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814002337 pmid:25185671.
  29. 29. Hadfield SJ, Pachebat JA, Swain MT, Robinson G, Cameron SJ, Alexander J, et al. Generation of whole genome sequences of new Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum isolates directly from stool samples. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:650. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1805-9 pmid:26318339; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4552982.
  30. 30. Valenzuela O, Gonzalez-Diaz M, Garibay-Escobar A, Burgara-Estrella A, Cano M, Durazo M, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in children from Mexico. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096128 pmid:24755606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3996000.
  31. 31. Koehler AV, Whipp M, Hogg G, Haydon SR, Stevens MA, Jex AR, et al. First genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from humans from Tasmania, and identification of a new genotype from a traveller to Bali. Electrophoresis. 2014;35(18):2600–7. doi: 10.1002/elps.201400225 pmid:24916177.
  32. 32. Qi M, Wang R, Ning C, Li X, Zhang L, Jian F, et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in pet birds: genetic diversity and potential public health significance. Exp Parasitol. 2011;128(4):336–40. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.04.003 pmid:21557938.
  33. 33. Li N, Xiao L, Alderisio K, Elwin K, Cebelinski E, Chalmers R, et al. Subtyping Cryptosporidium ubiquitum,a zoonotic pathogen emerging in humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(2):217–24. doi: 10.3201/eid2002.121797 pmid:24447504; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3901490.
  34. 34. Wang R, Zhang L, Axen C, Bjorkman C, Jian F, Amer S, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum IId family: clonal population and dispersal from Western Asia to other geographical regions. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4208. doi: 10.1038/srep04208 pmid:24572610; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3936226.
  35. 35. Sharma P, Khurana S, Sharma A, Sehgal R, Malla N. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans in North India. 15th International Congress on Infectious Diseases; 15 June 2012; Bangkok, Thailand2012.
  36. 36. Laishram S, Kang G, Ajjampur SS. Giardiasis: a review on assemblage distribution and epidemiology in India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2012;31(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s12664-012-0161-9 pmid:22311296.
  37. 37. Lobo ML, Augusto J, Antunes F, Ceita J, Xiao L, Codices V, et al. Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and other intestinal parasites in young children in Lobata province, Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097708 pmid:24846205; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4028242.
  38. 38. Hunter PR, Thompson RC. The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35(11–12):1181–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.009 pmid:16159658.
  39. 39. Gungoren B, Latipov R, Regallet G, Musabaev E. Effect of hygiene promotion on the risk of reinfection rate of intestinal parasites in children in rural Uzbekistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(6):564–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.02.011 pmid:17418321.
  40. 40. David EB, Coradi ST, Oliveira-Sequeira TCG, Ribolla PEM, Katagiri S, Guimaraes S. Diagnosis of Giardia infections by PCR-based methods in children of an endemic area. J Venom Anim Toxins. 2011;17(2):209–15. pmid:WOS:000290866500012