• Loading metrics

Global Population Structure of the Genes Encoding the Malaria Vaccine Candidate, Plasmodium vivax Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (PvAMA1)

  • Alicia Arnott,

    Affiliation Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia

  • Ivo Mueller,

    Affiliations Barcelona Centre for International Health Research, Barcelona, Spain, Division of Infection and Immunity, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

  • Paul A. Ramsland,

    Affiliations Centre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Surgery Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Australia, School of Biomedical Sciences, CHIRI Biosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

  • Peter M. Siba,

    Affiliation Papua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea

  • John C. Reeder,

    Affiliations Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Alyssa E. Barry

    Affiliations Division of Infection and Immunity, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia, Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

Global Population Structure of the Genes Encoding the Malaria Vaccine Candidate, Plasmodium vivax Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (PvAMA1)

  • Alicia Arnott, 
  • Ivo Mueller, 
  • Paul A. Ramsland, 
  • Peter M. Siba, 
  • John C. Reeder, 
  • Alyssa E. Barry



The Plasmodium vivax Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (PvAMA1) is a promising malaria vaccine candidate, however it remains unclear which regions are naturally targeted by host immunity and whether its high genetic diversity will preclude coverage by a monovalent vaccine. To assess its feasibility as a vaccine candidate, we investigated the global population structure of PvAMA1.

Methodology and Principal Findings

New sequences from Papua New Guinea (PNG, n = 102) were analysed together with published sequences from Thailand (n = 158), India (n = 8), Sri Lanka (n = 23), Venezuela (n = 74) and a collection of isolates from disparate geographic locations (n = 8). A total of 92 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified including 22 synonymous SNPs and 70 non-synonymous (NS) SNPs. Polymorphisms and signatures of balancing (positive Tajima's D and low FST values) selection were predominantly clustered in domain I, suggesting it is a dominant target of protective immune responses. To estimate global antigenic diversity, haplotypes comprised of (i) non-singleton (n = 40) and (ii) common (≥10% minor allele frequency, n = 23) polymorphic amino acid sites were then analysed revealing a total of 219 and 210 distinct haplotypes, respectively. Although highly diverse, the 210 haplotypes comprised of only common polymorphisms were grouped into eleven clusters, however substantial geographic differentiation was observed, and this may have implications for the efficacy of PvAMA1 vaccines in different malaria-endemic areas. The PNG haplotypes form a distinct group of clusters not found in any other geographic region. Vaccine haplotypes were rare and geographically restricted, suggesting potentially poor efficacy of candidate PvAMA1 vaccines.


It may be possible to cover the existing global PvAMA1 diversity by selection of diverse alleles based on these analyses however it will be important to first define the relationships between the genetic and antigenic diversity of this molecule.

Author Summary

Traditionally misclassified as benign and neglected as a research priority, it is now understood that P. vivax is an increasingly important cause of human malaria. This important human pathogen poses an enormous obstacle to malaria control and elimination efforts due its broad geographic distribution, ability to cause recurring episodes of malaria after long periods of inactivity and extreme biodiversity. Vaccines are an essential component of global malaria control and elimination campaigns but the diversity of malaria antigens is thought to be a major cause of vaccine failure. Furthermore, at present the majority of current vaccine research is directed toward P. falciparum. The aims of this study were to investigate the global diversity of the P. vivax vaccine candidate, Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (PvAMA1), to determine the feasibility of designing a globally effective PvAMA1 vaccine and to determine which region of PvAMA1 is targeted by host immune responses, in order to identify the most promising vaccine candidates. We report that PvAMA1 diversity is extremely high, and that PvAMA1 domain I is a dominant target of host immune responses. These analyses of PvAMA1 diversity from several geographic regions provide a framework to guide development of a broadly efficacious P. vivax vaccine.


More than 2.5 billion people live at risk of Plasmodium vivax infection [1]. Although it has been traditionally misclassified as a ‘benign’ infection, P. vivax is now known to result in serious illness and death [2], [3]. Research into P. vivax has been neglected and much remains unknown regarding the biology, pathogenesis and epidemiology of this parasite [4]. As a result, P. vivax remains a substantial obstacle to malaria control and elimination programs, as demonstrated in countries that have made progress in reducing the burden of the other major human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum [5]. Worldwide, the burden of P. vivax has been increasing [6], [7], [8] in the context of a substantial decrease in P. falciparum cases [9], but research on novel P. vivax drug and vaccine targets currently lags far behind that of P. falciparum. To date only two P. vivax candidate vaccines have reached Phase I clinical trials, as compared to 23 P. falciparum vaccine candidates, several of which have progressed to Phase II and III clinical trials [10].

The Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1) is found in all Plasmodium spp. and parasites of the Apicomplexa phylum [11], [12], and is a promising vaccine candidate for both P. falciparum and P. vivax [11], [13]. AMA1 is an 83 kDa type 1 integral membrane protein consisting of a signal sequence, a cysteine-rich ectodomain, a conserved cytoplasmic region and a transmembrane region. Disulfide bonds between cysteine residues of the AMA1 ectodomain promote separation of the ectodomain into three distinct domains (DI–DIII) [14]. From experiments performed using P. falciparum and Toxoplasma gondii, it is now known that invasion of host cells involves the moving junction (MJ) complex, which enables internalization of the parasite into the host cell [15], [16]. The MJ contains AMA1 and unique Apicomplexa proteins called rhoptry neck (RON) proteins. In particular, the RON2 protein has been shown to interact directly with AMA1. Blocking this interaction inhibits parasite invasion [17]. In the Apicomplexan parasite T. gondii, conditional AMA1 null parasites could not invade host cells [18]. Similarly, AMA1 has been shown to be essential for P. falciparum invasion of host cells [12], [19], [20].

During invasion, the bulk of the AMA1 ectodomain is shed, leaving only the 22 kDa cytoplasmic tail which is carried into the host cell [21]. A consequence of this shedding is evasion of anti-AMA1 immune responses [19]. Immuno-epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the ectodomains of both P. falciparum and P. vivax AMA1 are highly immunogenic [11], [22], [23]. In human populations that are naturally exposed to malaria, AMA1 antibody levels are higher than those of other blood-stage antigens [11], [22] and these have been shown to inhibit P. falciparum invasion of host cells [24], [25], [26]. As AMA1 is essential for invasion of both host erythrocytes by merozoites and sporozoite invasion of hepatocytes, a vaccine that induces antibodies to AMA1 may be effective at two distinct life-cycle stages, thus increasing the likelihood of protection against malaria [12].

Domains I (DI) and II (DII) of AMA1 share a common core topology, namely a pair of closely associated PAN (Plasminogen, Apple, Nematode) domains [12]. Loops of DI and DII extend from the PAN domains to surround and contribute to the base and sides of a long hydrophobic cleft, created by the interaction of DI and DII on the AMA1 surface [12], [27]. The cleft is a highly conserved ligand-binding site [17], [28]. It is therefore hypothesised that the highly polymorphic loop structures provide conformational masking to protect the binding site from host antibody responses [28]. This is supported by the fact that many of the most polymorphic sites are located on the loops of DI, at one end of the cleft [27], [28]. Accordingly, for P. falciparum, the majority of the genetic diversity occurs in DI [29], [30], [31], however it has been reported that both DI and DII are highly polymorphic for P. vivax [29], [32]. Analyses of full-length P. vivax AMA1 (Pvama1) ectodomain sequences from Venezuela suggest that balancing (immune) selection is predominant in DI [29]. Evidence of balancing selection on DI has also been reported in other parasite populations, however many of these studies investigated sequence diversity only within DI and not the entire ectodomain [33], [34], [35]. Evidence of diversifying selection on DII was observed among full-length Pvama1 nucleotide sequences from Sri Lanka, suggesting that regions of DII may also be targeted by protective immune responses [32]. Furthermore, serological studies have shown DII to be the most immunogenic of the three domains [22]. Therefore, although the hydrophobic cleft found in DI is clearly the target of host immune responses, it is likely that antibodies also recognize epitopes in other regions of the PvAMA1 ectodomain. It remains unclear which domain is predominantly targeted by protective host immune responses and therefore which domain(s) should be incorporated into a PvAMA1-based vaccine.

To design an effective PvAMA1-based malaria vaccine, it is important not only to identify the region representing the strongest natural immune target, but also to include alleles that induce antibodies with broad reactivity to cover the antigenic diversity of the global P. vivax population [36]. It is therefore also important to understand the population structure of vaccine candidate antigens, to predict key polymorphisms that contribute to antigenic diversity [12], [37], [38] and to investigate the geographical distribution of antigen diversity. Population genetic studies are thus needed to guide informed vaccine design [39], [40].

Presented here is the most comprehensive study of Pvama1 genetic diversity undertaken to date. The aims of this study were to investigate the population structure of Pvama1 in two highly malaria endemic regions of Papua New Guinea (PNG), and to compare the data to published Pvama1 sequences from other parasite populations to identify polymorphisms likely to be vaccine-relevant. The results of this study have important implications for the design of a vaccine incorporating PvAMA1, with respect to selection of the optimal target region of the protein, and the haplotypes required to cover diversity.

Materials and Methods

Study sites and Plasmodium vivax isolates

Within PNG, the four main malaria species that infect humans (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae) are endemic, and mixed species infections are common [7], [41]. The PNG provinces of Madang and East Sepik are areas of intense perennial malaria transmission and have long been the focus of malaria research and control efforts in PNG. To capture a broad cross-section of the circulating parasite population, venous blood samples were collected from volunteers of all ages in cross-sectional malaria surveys conducted in the catchment areas of Mugil, Malala and Utu in Madang Province and the Wosera district in the East Sepik Province. Because studies using microsatellite markers have indicated limited geographic population structure of P. vivax in PNG [42], samples collected from the three different catchments in Madang Province were combined to form a single population for comparison to that from the more distant Wosera, East Sepik parasite population. Nevertheless, data for the four different catchments (Mugil, Malala, Utu and Wosera) were also analysed separately to investigate possible differences in PvAMA1 between catchments. The P. vivax isolates and the study sites are described in more detail elsewhere [43], [44]. A total of 102 monoclonal P. vivax isolates were identified by genotyping P. vivax positive samples at the highly polymorphic loci MS16 and msp1F3 according to published methods [45].

Ethics statement

Samples archived in a biobank at the PNG Institute of Medical Research were used in the study. The original study in which samples were collected was explained in detail to the parents through both individual and community awareness meetings. On the basis of these explanations, volunteers were invited to participate in the study. During enrolment, adult volunteers or the legal guardians of child volunteers were asked to provide oral informed consent to participate in the study as this was the ethical requirement for this particular study, as approved by the local Institutional Review Board (see details below). Oral consent to participate in the study and for samples to be used in further research was documented in a database. Enrolment in the study was possible only if consent was given. All consenting members of selected populations were eligible for enrolment into the community surveys. People with concurrent or chronic illness that might impede their participation in the surveys were excluded. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted by the PNG Institute of Medical Research Institutional Review Board (No. 11-05), the Medical Research Advisory Committee of PNG (No. 11-06), the Alfred Hospital Research and Ethics Unit (No. 420-10) and the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 11-12).

Pvama1 PCR and sequencing

Using a previously described nested PCR approach [29], [46], nucleotides 1-1524 of the 1686 bp Pvama1 coding sequence were amplified and sequenced. This region encompasses the signal sequence and the complete ectodomain (DI to DIII) [29]. Sequencing reactions were performed by a contract sequencing facility using the ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit on an ABI 3730XL automatic DNA Analyser (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea).

Sequence analysis

Raw sequence data was edited and assembled into contigs using Sequencher version 5.0 [47]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified by comparing the consensus sequences for each isolate to the reference Pvama1 sequence, Sal-1 (GenBank accession number AF063138; Table S1). Individual SNPs were validated if they were present in at least one other isolate. Rare SNPs (frequency = 1) were confirmed by sequencing a second independent PCR product.

To investigate the worldwide population structure of Pvama1, 263 previously published full-length ectodomain sequences were retrieved from GenBank (Table S1). These Pvama1 sequences represented the parasite populations of seven distinct locations, including one in Venezuela sampled at two different time points (Amazon Basin 1996 and 1997, n = 73) [29], two regions of Thailand with one region sampled at two different time points (Chanthaburi and Tak 1996 and 2007, n = 158) [48], India (Rajasthan, n = 8) [49], Sri Lanka (Kataragama-Colombo, n = 23) [32] and South Korea (n = 1) (Table S1). A fourth Thai population was excluded, because diversity within this population was found to be extremely low (4 haplotypes among 73 isolates) and is reportedly due to rapid clonal population expansion from a small number of founder isolates [48]. The Pvama1 sequences of six primate-adapted P. vivax isolates used for vaccine research (Chesson I, Belem, India VII, Indonesia XIX, Palo Alto, North Korea; [50]) and Sal-1, were also obtained from GenBank and included in the analyses (Table S1).

Alignment and phylogenetic analysis of Pvama1 sequences was performed using MEGA version 5.0 [51]. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed using DNA sequences encoding the full ectodomain and the p-distance nucleotide substitution model with 1000 bootstrap replicates, to investigate the relatedness between Pvama1 alleles circulating in the East Sepik and Madang provinces of PNG.

Allele frequencies were calculated using CONVERT version 1.31 [52]. The following analyses were performed using DnaSP version 5.0 [53]: several diversity statistics were calculated for the worldwide dataset and each individual population including the total number of polymorphisms (S), the number of synonymous (SP) and non-synonymous (NS) polymorphisms, nucleotide diversity (Π; Pi), the number of haplotypes (h) and haplotype diversity (Hd). Haplotype diversity is analogous to the expected heterozygosity and is calculated as follows:where n is the sample size and f is the frequency of the ith allele [54].

For the entire dataset, nucleotide diversity was calculated across the length of the gene using a sliding window approach, with a window size of 100 and step size of 3. To identify significant departures from neutral evolution the Tajima's D test statistic [55] was also calculated for each population with a sample size >30 using a sliding window approach with a window size of 100 and a step size of 3. Balancing selection (measured using the Tajima's D test) maintains alleles at balanced frequencies within populations, resulting in very low levels of local interpopulation differentiation (FST) at selected loci [39].

To focus the analysis on polymorphisms affecting protein structure and therefore with the potential to influence antigenic diversity, haplotypes were constructed using all of the non-singleton amino acid polymorphisms. Amino acid polymorphisms were analysed rather than DNA due to the presence of complex codons with multiple non-synonymous polymorphisms. Two haplotype datasets were prepared: (i) all 40 non-singleton amino acid polymorphisms, and (ii) a minimal haplotype comprised of 23 amino acid polymorphisms ranking highly for relevance to vaccine design. The ranking criteria used to determine relevant polymorphisms included a minor allele frequency (MAF)≥10% which excluded rare polymorphisms [56] and where possible, evidence of balancing selection including a significant Tajima's D value and low levels of interpopulation differentiation, measured by determining pairwise FST values for each polymorphic site [57], [58]. Low FST (≤0.15) suggests maintenance of balanced allele frequencies as a result of immune selection; whereas the frequency of polymorphisms not under selection is likely to change at random and result in higher FST values (≥0.25). This analysis could only be performed for countries where parasite populations were available from more than one geographic region (i.e. Thailand and PNG); other populations could not be included because geographic population structure between continents may obscure balancing selection [39]. The software GENEPOP version 4.1.1 [59], [60], with all parameters set at default values, was used to calculate FST.

To identify groups of closely-related haplotypes likely to be “antigenically similar”, and their geographic distribution, the haplotypes were analysed using the Bayesian clustering algorithm implemented in Structure version 2.3.2 software [61], [62]. This Bayesian clustering algorithm groups related haplotypes into a user-defined number of clusters (K) on the basis of shared allele frequencies. Each haplotype is assigned a membership coefficient (Q) to each of the clusters, with Q<75% indicating an admixed haplotype likely to have arisen by recombination between genetically distinct sequences. Replicate runs of Structure were performed using a burn-in period of 10,000 iterations, followed by 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations from which estimates of population numbers were obtained. All runs were based on the admixture model, with no prior population information [61]. Twenty replicate runs were performed for K values of 1 to 30. To predict the optimal value of K, the posterior probability of the data (LnP[D]) [52] and its standard deviation were plotted as well as an ad hoc statistic based on the second order rate of change of K, ΔK, according to the method of Evanno et al., (2005) [63]. Geographic population structure was investigated by visually assessing whether the clusters were distributed randomly (no geographic structure) or among locations (geographic structure).

To investigate more complex relationships among haplotypes and to infer patterns of recombination amongst haplotypes and haplotype clusters, a network analysis was performed for the unique haplotypes by using Phylogenetic Network software version together with the add-ons DNA Alignment and Network Publisher ( The network analysis was based on the Median Joining algorithm [64].

Structural modelling of PvAMA1

Homology models of PvAMA1 were prepared with the Build Model protocol that uses the Modeller algorithm [65] of the Discovery Studio suite, version 3.0 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA). Using this approach, an atomic model of PvAMA1 was generated from a chimeric template and sequence alignment. The chimeric template was generated using overlays of the P. vivax (Protein Data Bank ID: 1W81) and P. falciparum (Protein Data Bank ID: 1Z40) AMA1 crystal structures, and grafting PfAMA1 loop residues onto the PvAMA1 core. The grafted residues were as follows: PfAMA1 residues 260 to 263 (numbering relative to the P. falciparum reference strain 3D7 AMA1 sequence) which corresponded to PvAMA1 residues 205 to 208 (numbering relative to the P. vivax reference strain Sal-1 AMA1 sequence); PfAMA1 residues 350 to 385 which corresponded to PvAMA1 residues 295 to 325; PfAMA1 residues 388 and 390 which corresponded to PvAMA1 residues 333 to 334. Four PvAMA1 loop structures missing from both the PvAMA1 and PfAMA1 crystal structures were generated automatically by Modeller using only stereochemical and geometric restraints: PvAMA1 residues 171 to 175 (loop 1), 209 to 218 (loop 2), 331 and 332 (loop 3), 400 to 412 (loop 4). The P. vivax Sal-1 reference sequence (GenBank accession number AF063138) was aligned against the chimeric template sequence in order to generate the PvAMA1 model. Optimisation of template-based models was achieved by iterative cycles of conjugate-gradient minimisation against a probability density function (PDF) that included spatial restraints derived from the template and residue specific properties [65]. Five models were generated and the optimised model with the lowest final PDF energy was used for structural analysis and figure preparation using Discovery Studio, version 3.1.

Accession numbers

The 102 Pvama1 sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KC702402–KC702503.


Polymorphism and genetic diversity of the genes encoding PvAMA1 in two parasite populations of Papua New Guinea

Complete Pvama1 sequences encoding the ectodomain (nucleotides 1-1524 relative to Sal-1, [GenBank accession number: AF063138]) were obtained for 102 monoclonal P. vivax isolates from PNG, which included 41 sequences from the East Sepik Province (ES) and 61 from Madang Province (Mad). Multiple DNA sequence alignments revealed a total of 46 SNPs, including 7 synonymous (SP: ES = 9, Mad = 12) and 39 non-synonymous (NS: ES = 30, Mad = 31; Table 1).

Table 1. Estimates of genetic diversity for Pvama1 in nine worldwide populations.

Amongst the 102 PNG Pvama1 sequences obtained, a total of 87 NS-SNP haplotypes were identified (ES = 38, Mad = 52), 84 of which were restricted to one of the two populations (ES = 35, Mad = 49) (Table 1). Haplotype diversity was close to the highest possible level (Hd>0.99; Table 1). Despite the majority of haplotypes being unique to each of the PNG populations, Pvama1 sequences from the ES and Mad populations did not form distinct clades by phylogenetic analyses (Figure S1).

Polymorphism and genetic diversity of the genes encoding PvAMA1 in eight worldwide parasite populations

The Pvama1 sequence data obtained from PNG (n = 102) was then compared to previously published sequences from three populations in Thailand (Chanthaburi and Tak 1996 and 2007; n = 158), two from Venezuela (Amazon Basin 1996 and 1997; n = 73) and one each from India (n = 8) and Sri Lanka (n = 23). Also included in the analyses was a single P. vivax isolate from South Korea (n = 1) and seven geographically diverse reference isolates (n = 7). Hereafter, when referring to sequence datasets used in this paper, ‘global’ refers to a combined dataset consisting of the PNG Pvama1 sequences obtained in this study and the published Pvama1 sequences indicated above. A total of 92 SNPs were identified amongst the 372 global and reference Pvama1 sequences, including 22 SP SNPs and 70 NS SNPs (Table 1).

The majority of NS SNPs (72.5%) clustered within domain I, demonstrated by a peak in nucleotide diversity (Π) for this region (Figures 1A and 1B; Figure S2). Although a cluster of SNPs was also observed at the junction between domains II and III, values of Π in this region were lower than that observed for DI and DII due to the fact that these were lower frequency polymorphisms (Frequency = 0.11–0.23; Figure 1B). Even with singletons removed, haplotype diversity was extremely high for the global dataset (Hd = 0.99), with a total of 218 NS-SNP haplotypes identified (Table 1). In all populations, the genetic diversity of Pvama1 was extremely high with predominantly NS SNPs, and extremely high Π and Hd values (Table 1). Diversity was highest in PNG and Thailand and lowest in Venezuela (Table 1).

Figure 1. Population genetics of the genes encoding the PvAMA1 ectodomain.

A) Polymorphism. Schematic of the Pvama1 region analysed indicating the locations of all nonsynonymous (NS, red lines), synonymous (SP, blue lines) and NS and SP singleton (black and grey lines, respectively) SNPs. Black arrows indicate the positions of PCR primers. B) Diversity. Sliding window analysis showing nucleotide diversity (Π; Pi) values in Pvama1 for the 372 sequences analysed. A window size of 100 bp and a step size of 3 bp were used. C) Natural selection. Sliding window calculation of Tajima's D statistic was performed for the two PNG populations (blue = Madang, n = 61; red = East Sepik, n = 41). A window size of 100 and a step size of 3 were used. Horizontal dashed lines indicates the significance threshold of p = 0.05; A single asterisk indicates significance values for which p<0.05; and double asterisk indicates p<0.01. D) Amino acid allele frequencies. The frequencies of 40 non-singleton NS amino acid polymorphisms are indicated by the proportion of each bar shaded. Polymorphisms with minor allele frequencies (MAF)≥10% as indicated by an asterisk, were used for further analyses. E) Interpopulation differentiation. Pairwise FST values were calculated for the two PNG populations at each of the 40 non-singleton NS amino acid polymorphisms. Those with a MAF≥10% are indicated by an asterisk.

Signatures of balancing selection in the genes encoding PvAMA1

To identify the predominant target(s) of balancing selection, Tajima's D values across the region encoding the PvAMA1 ectodomain were individually determined for each natural population using a sliding window approach (Figure 1C, Figure S3). Significant positive values of Tajima's D indicate balancing selection, whereas negative values indicate purifying or directional selection. Although positive values of Tajima's D were observed across the length of the entire ectodomain, highly significant (p<0.01) positive values were consistently observed within DI of the PNG, Thai and Venezuelan populations (Figures 1C, and S3), which suggests this domain is a dominant target of host immune responses.

A minimal PvAMA1 haplotype relevant to malaria vaccine design

The 40 non-singleton amino acid polymorphisms identified amongst the global dataset of 372 sequences were then ranked for their potential to contribute to antigenic diversity and therefore their relevance to development of a broadly efficacious vaccine. Amino acid polymorphisms with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of ≥10% were chosen because these polymorphic sites were deemed common and thus contribute to a large proportion of the global PvAMA1 diversity. If there was more than one minor allele, polymorphisms with a sum of these MAFs ≥10% were also included. Twenty-three polymorphisms met the defined criteria (Figure 1D). Additionally, the interpopulation differentiation was measured for each polymorphic site to predict sites under balancing selection. Low FST values (<0.1) for those polymorphisms located within DI were found between the two PNG populations (Figure 1E) as well as between two Thai populations sampled in 2007 (data not shown) providing further evidence that immune selection is acting to maintain diversity at these sites [39]. Of the 23 polymorphic residues, 10 were dimorphic, 10 were trimorphic and three were tetramorphic (Table S2). Thirteen (56.5%) of the 23 variant sites were located within DI (Figure S2).

In P. falciparum, four clusters of polymorphic residues within AMA1 domain I, namely c1, c1L, c2 and c3, have previously been associated with antigenic escape [66]. In total, 9 of the 23 PvAMA1 polymorphic amino acids mapped to the same positions as PfAMA1 c1, c1L, c2 or c3 residues (Figure S2). The PfAMA1 c1 cluster spans 21 residues, 7 of which are polymorphic [67], however only 4 of the 23 polymorphic Pvama1 residues mapped to this region (Figure S2). Located within the c1 cluster, residues of the c1L subcluster are most strongly associated with PfAMA1 escape from antibody-mediated inhibition [38]. Only two of the 23 ‘common’ PvAMA1 polymorphisms were located within the 11-residue stretch corresponding to the PfAMA1 c1L cluster (Figure S2).

We then compared the diversity of haplotypes comprised of non-singleton polymorphisms (40-mer) and those that were common (23-mer). Despite a large decrease in the total number of polymorphisms included in the 23-mer compared to the 40-mer haplotype, there was only a marginal decrease in the number of haplotypes from 219 to 210 respectively, showing that the 23-mer haplotypes are indeed representative of a large majority of the known PvAMA1 diversity (Figures 2 and S4; Table 1). Similarly, the proportion of haplotypes shared between populations was equivalent for both the 40-mer and 23-mer haplotype datasets. Twenty-five of the 219 40-mers (11.4%) were shared between populations whereas 30 of the 210 23-mers (14.2%) were shared between populations (Figures 2 and S4). However, half of the shared 23-mers were actually shared only between the three Thai populations (Figure 2) and only three (10%) were shared between populations from different countries. Notably, there were no dominant haplotypes, and the vaccine strain Sal-1 haplotype was not identified in any of the parasite populations included in the study (Figures 2 and S4). Of the reference strain PvAMA1 sequences included in the analysis, only the Belem/Palo Alto (which have identical haplotypes) and Chesson I haplotypes were detected, but these were restricted to one of the Thai populations (Chanthaburi, Figure 2).

Figure 2. Worldwide distribution of PvAMA1 haplotypes.

The frequencies of 210 haplotypes based on the analysis of 23 common amino acid polymorphisms are depicted as pie charts and mapped to their geographic origin. Coloured segments indicate shared haplotypes and grey indicates haplotypes unique to one population. Only two haplotypes were identical to reference strains (Belem/Palo Alto and Chesson I), therefore haplotypes from the remaining reference strains are shown in grey. Sample size (n) and origin are indicated.

Polymorphic residues under balancing selection mapped exclusively to solvent-exposed surfaces mostly within PvAMA1 DI and DII

A three-dimensional model of PvAMA1 was generated in order understand the potential structure-function relationships of the 23 polymorphic amino acids under balancing selection. In order to determine the proximity of the polymorphic residues to the ligand binding cleft, the amino acid residues comprising the hydrophobic ligand binding cleft [27], in addition to 22 of the 23 polymorphic residues under selection, were mapped to the PvAMA1 structure. One of the 23 polymorphic residues (Gln25) was located within the signal sequence and could not be mapped to the three-dimensional structure as the first 40 residues were missing from both the PvAMA1 and PfAMA1 crystal structures used for modelling of PvAMA1.

All 22 polymorphic residues mapped to solvent-exposed surfaces of the PvAMA1 molecule (Figure 3). Extreme bias in the distribution of polymorphisms was observed, with 21 of the 22 polymorphic residues located on one face of the PvAMA1 structure (Figure 3B). Only the signal sequence polymorphic residue (Arg66) was located on the opposing face (Figure 3C). Four polymorphic residues (Lys120, Asn130, Asn132 and Glu145) were located proximal to the hydrophobic binding cleft in DI loops (Figure 4), three of which aligned with highly polymorphic PfAMA1 residues associated with antigenic escape [38]. The PvAMA1 Lys120 residue aligned with PfAMA1 Tyr175 located within the c3 cluster; PvAMA1 Asn132 and Glu145 aligned with PfAMA1 Glu187 and His200, respectively, located within the c1 cluster (Figure 4, Figure S2).

Figure 3. Location of 22 polymorphic PvAMA1 residues predicted to be under balancing selection.

A) Ribbon diagram of the PvAMA1 model showing each of the PvAMA1 domains (DI in cyan, DII in magenta, and DIII in orange) and the hydrophobic ligand binding cleft (dark blue). Each of the 22 residues under selection and the 12 hydrophobic cleft residues are shown by CPK-models of their atoms (spheres) and are coloured according to location. B) Solvent-accessible surface representation of the ‘active face’ of the PvAMA1 model. The hydrophobic cleft and polymorphic residues are shown, with colouring as described for panel A. C) Solvent-accessible surface representation of the ‘silent face’ of the PvAMA1 model. The hydrophobic cleft and polymorphic residues are shown, with colouring as described for panel A.

Figure 4. Proximity of the PvAMA1 residues under selection to the hydrophobic ligand-binding cleft.

Solvent-accessible surface representation of the PvAMA1 model showing a top-view of the hydrophobic ligand-binding cleft. Binding cleft residues are highlighted in dark blue, DI polymorphic residues in cyan and a DII residue in magenta. Residues labeled with bold, underlined type are located in close proximity to the cleft and are predicted to be of functional importance.

Population structure and clustering patterns of PvAMA1 amino acid haplotypes

To identify population structure and therefore genetically distinct subgroups among the 23-mer amino acid haplotypes, cluster analyses were performed. Analysis of (i) the LnP[D] curve, (ii) ΔK plot [63] and (iii) the distribution of clusters amongst haplotypes indicated that the haplotypes were optimally grouped into eleven clusters (K = 11; Figure 5A). Clusters were unevenly distributed among parasite populations with the majority of haplotypes in each geographic region having membership to only a few of the defined clusters (Figure 5B). This indicates substantial geographic differentiation, though only on a broad geographical scale as parasite populations from the same country showed similar clustering patterns (Figure 5B). The PNG haplotypes were classified into three clusters, which were found only in PNG, namely clusters 1 (15.6% of PNG haplotypes), 3 (33%) and 4 (15.6%). Thirty-three PNG haplotypes (32.3%) were admixed (i.e. <75% membership to any one cluster) (Figure 5B). Interestingly, all seven of the reference isolate haplotypes were admixed, suggesting that there may be additional clusters in other populations not yet surveyed (Figure S5).

Figure 5. Clustering patterns of PvAMA1 haplotypes.

Structure analysis of PvAMA1 haplotypes composed of 23 common amino acid polymorphisms. Haplotypes are shown according to A) the membership coefficient (Q) and B) geographic distribution of eleven clusters (K = 11).

The 210 unique 23-mer haplotypes formed a dense network with extremely complex relationships (Figure 6) however reducing the sample set to haplotypes with a frequency >1 revealed a more segmented network (Figure S6). Branching patterns in both networks correlated well with the cluster analyses described above and thus the country of origin, and ties between clusters were punctuated by admixed haplotypes (Figure 6, S6). A large number of admixed haplotypes were lost from the second network showing that these are mostly rare haplotypes and thus may be new recombinants (Figure S6). Interestingly, clusters from the South American and Asian populations overlapped, whereas all three clusters found in PNG were found in a distinct region of the network. This showed that PNG forms a distinct group of clusters more closely related to each other than clusters found in other parts of the world (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Network analysis of PvAMA1 haplotypes.

Haplotypes composed of 23 common amino acid polymorphisms were analysed using the Median Joining algorithm implemented in Phylogenetic Network version software. Nodes represent the haplotypes and lines indicate connections between them. The size of each node indicates haplotype frequency. Colours indicated by the key depict the cluster membership as defined by Structure analyses.


Plasmodium vivax is responsible for a large proportion of the global malaria burden, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region and thus must be targeted if malaria elimination is to be achieved. P. vivax is proving more difficult to eliminate than P. falciparum most likely due to its dormant liver stage, and there are fewer research tools available with which to study it [4], [68]. Furthermore, P. vivax is a more genetically diverse parasite than P. falciparum [69] suggesting a greater potential for vaccine escape. Vaccines could function as a key component of control and elimination campaigns, however the majority of current vaccine research is directed primarily toward P. falciparum. Research toward development of vaccines targeting P. vivax must therefore be prioritised. The aim of this study was to examine the global population structure of PvAMA1, and thus to assess its feasibility as a vaccine candidate.

Consistent with published reports [11], [38], the genetic diversity of PvAMA1 was extremely high, however there was substantial geographic variability with lower diversity in Venezuela compared to PNG and Thailand. As diversity increases with transmission intensity due to an increased effective population size and rates of recombination [70], it is likely that lower malaria transmission in Venezuela [71], [72] contributed to the lower genetic diversity observed. Higher genetic diversity in Asia is also consistent with the hypothesis that P. vivax originated in this region, with consequent founder effects and smaller effective population sizes in South America [73], [74].

Natural selection exerted by host immune responses, and recombination between genetically distinct clones during meiotic replication in the mosquito midgut are the two main mechanisms by which AMA1 genetic diversity is likely to be generated and maintained [30], [75]. Balancing selection acts to maintain key antigen polymorphisms at low to medium frequencies to enable the parasite to evade targeted immune responses [40]. Population genetic analyses have therefore been used previously to successfully identify important targets of host immune responses within the P. falciparum antigen genes, Merozoite Surface Protein 1 (MSP1) and AMA1 [39], [40]. The majority of the diversity and balancing selection in PvAMA1 mapped to DI, as has been observed previously for both P. falciparum and P. vivax [29], [31], [76]. Although PvAMA1 DII has been reported as highly immunogenic [22], [23] and there is some evidence of balancing selection in DII [75], our results are consistent with those of other studies that suggest DI is the dominant target of naturally acquired host immune responses [29], [35], [77]. Negative values of Tajima's D obtained by Taylor et al., [78] following analysis of mitochondrial (mtDNA) sequences from PNG provide further evidence that the positive values of Tajima's D obtained for Pvama1 DI are the result of balancing selection acting on this region. Domain I therefore represents the strongest candidate domain for incorporation into a potential PvAMA1 vaccine.

As reported previously [77], extreme bias in the distribution of the polymorphic residues under selection was observed. Twenty-one of the 22 ‘common’ residues were located on one side of the PvAMA1 ectodomain, suggesting that this ‘face’ is potentially more exposed and accessible to host immune responses, consistent with our findings that these residues are under strong balancing selection. Only two PvAMA1 polymorphisms mapped to the PfAMA1 c1L cluster of polymorphisms (positions 196 to 207 of DI), which is most strongly associated with antibody escape [38]. A total of nine PvAMA1 polymorphisms mapped to the four additional clusters of PfAMA1 residues also associated with immune evasion [38]. The highly polymorphic residues of the PfAMA1 c1L cluster are located on loops, which are thought to protect a functionally critical binding trough by forming a ‘shield’ to divert host antibody responses [12]. Differences in the positioning of PfAMA1 and PvAMA1 polymorphic residues suggests differential organisation and presentation of the domain I loops. Four of the 23 ‘common’ polymorphisms identified (E145A, P210S, K352E and R438H) did however map to predicted PvAMA1 B-cell epitopes [79]. Consistent with the findings of Zakeri et al., [79], residue E145A was identified in the present study as one of four ‘common’ polymorphic residues located proximal to the PvAMA1 ligand-binding cleft, suggesting a potential role for this residue in immune evasion. Additionally, two ‘common’ polymorphisms (Q380K and L384P/R) were reported to cause changes in protein polarity and hydrophilicity and therefore may alter protein structure [79]. Dias et al., (2011) also reported decreased epitope binding scores or loss of the predicted linear B cell epitope due to these two polymorphisms, either together or in combination with proximal polymorphisms [80]. It will now be important to determine the functional relevance of the 23 ‘common’ polymorphic amino acids identified in this survey of global PvAMA1 diversity.

An effective PvAMA1 vaccine must include alleles (haplotypes) that induce host immune responses that are sufficiently broad to cover the existing antigenic diversity [36], [70]. Neafsey et al., (2012) recently reported that generating broad cross-reactive immune responses against highly polymorphic antigens, such as AMA1, may present a far greater challenge for P. vivax than for P. falciparum on account of higher P. vivax sequence diversity [69]. Our observation that only 15% of PvAMA1 haplotypes were shared between populations and the complex network connected by rare admixed haplotypes suggest that covering diversity will be challenging. Although highly diverse, cluster analysis of the 210 PvAMA1 minimal haplotypes identified 11 distinct subgroups. The number of clusters identified was almost double that identified amongst global PfAMA1 sequences ([81], [82], n = 6), however deep sampling of an African population suggested up to 16 PfAMA1 clusters [38]. In stark contrast to the relatively even global distribution of known PfAMA1 diversity [81], [82], substantial geographical differentiation between populations was observed for PvAMA1. The observation that the majority of PNG PvAMA1 sequences were grouped into three closely related clusters not found outside PNG indicates that PNG harbours distinct PvAMA1 sequences with negligible overlap between Asian and South American populations, and strengthens previous findings that the PNG P. vivax population is distinct from other worldwide populations [78], [83].

The burden of P.vivax in PNG is amongst the highest in the world [84], however P. vivax diversity, including that associated with antigens such as AMA1, has been rarely studied in PNG. Few haplotypes were shared between the two PNG populations. However, the PNG sequences and haplotypes did not bifurcate by province in the phylogenetic, cluster or network analyses. Although sympatric P. falciparum populations in the same two regions of PNG are genetically distinct [43], the PvAMA1 clustering patterns in the two P. vivax populations of PNG were almost identical suggesting mixing of PvAMA1 alleles between the two populations. However, balancing selection is also likely to influence these patterns [39]. The lack of similarities to other worldwide populations may be the result of the geographical isolation and large effective population size of PNG parasites, or another variable such as a specific host genetic adaptation and thus warrants further investigation. Additionally, based on more slowly evolving mtDNA haplotypes, that the PNG P. vivax population has higher genetic diversity and is differentiated from other populations worldwide may be a result of founder effects combined with a long history of intense P. vivax transmission in PNG [78], [83], [85]. A further explanation might be adaptation to the range of unique red blood cell polymorphisms in the PNG human population, including one that is associated with protection against infection with P. vivax [86]. The fact the P. vivax population in PNG is genetically distinct compared to other global parasite populations suggests that a PvAMA1-based malaria vaccine effective in other parts of the world may not be as successful in PNG.

In order to determine if development of a globally effective PvAMA1 vaccine is feasible, it will be important to establish whether PvAMA1 haplotypes from different clusters are antigenically distinct, as has been previously observed for PfAMA1 [81]. Indeed, it was recently reported that PfAMA1 sequence differences may not necessarily be strong predictors of antigenic differences or the level of cross-inhibitory antibody activity because not all polymorphic residues contribute equally to antibody binding and escape [87]. Whether the antigenic diversity of inhibitory antibody epitopes is similarly limited for PvAMA1 remains unknown. The functional contribution of each of the polymorphisms identified in this study to inhibitory antibody activity must now be determined, so that the number of alleles required to cover the breadth of global PvAMA1 diversity can be established.

As P. vivax cannot be continuously maintained in culture, recombinant proteins used for immunoepidemiological studies and vaccine development are typically derived from the reference strain, Sal-1. Inclusion of alleles that are not representative of natural parasite populations within a malaria vaccine may result in poor vaccine efficacy or selection for variants not included in the vaccine, and waning of vaccine efficacy over time [38]. It was therefore an important finding of this study that the reference strain Sal-1 PvAMA1 haplotype was not found in the global dataset. Historically, despite widespread knowledge of high diversity and strain-specific immunity in malaria vaccine candidates, the naturally circulating genetic diversity has rarely been considered when developing candidate vaccines [82] and this may explain the poor clinical efficacy observed [88], [89]. The identical Belem and Palo Alto haplotypes and the Chesson I haplotype were observed but were restricted to one Thai population. Alleles of the commonly used reference isolates for P. vivax vaccine design do not circulate widely, if at all, amongst natural populations and this may have serious implications for development of a PvAMA1 vaccine based on these strains.

In summary, we have demonstrated that the global genetic diversity of PvAMA1 is exceptionally high and geographically structured, and that domain I is a dominant target of balancing selection. Analyses of haplotypes based only on common amino acid polymorphisms predicted to contribute to antigenic diversity demonstrated that an enormous amount of diversity must be considered in developing a broadly efficacious PvAMA1 vaccine. Importantly however, the cluster and network analyses provide a framework upon which to select a panel of broadly representative haplotypes for inclusion in a future PvAMA1 vaccine. Functional testing must now be performed to investigate the contribution of the polymorphic residues identified to antibody binding and escape, and also to determine which combination of haplotypes might induce antibodies capable of providing broad coverage against the global antigenic diversity of PvAMA1.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Phylogenetic analysis of PNG Pvama1 sequences. Neighbor-Joining tree constructed using 102 unique Pvama1 ectodomain sequences from PNG. Circles indicate sequences from Madang and triangles, East Sepik. Circle/triangle colours correspond to the cluster membership (Figure 5) of each sequence: cluster 1 (red), cluster 3 (blue), cluster 4 (yellow), cluster 5 (pink), cluster 8 (maroon) and admixed (black). The Sal-1 reference sequence was also included as indicated. The tree was constructed using 10,000 bootstrap replicates, with only values >70% shown. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as the evolutionary distance (number of differences) used to infer the tree. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair.



Figure S2.

Alignment of P. falciparum and P. vivax AMA1 protein sequences. P. vivax Sal-1 (GenBank: AF063138) and P. falciparum 3D7 (XM_001347979) were aligned using MEGA version 5.0 [51]. Numbers indicate the position of residues relative to those of the P. falciparum sequence. Gaps are indicated by dashes. Red bold type indicates the 23 common P. vivax amino acids predicted to be immunologically relevant. Black bold type indicates residues that are polymorphic in both species [77]. The domain boundaries are demarcated by vertical lines, as indicated. Boxes indicate the positions of antigenic P. falciparum amino acid clusters, c1-3 [66]; Grey shading indicates antigenic escape residues in c1L [38].



Figure S3.

Natural selection within Pvama1 for isolates from Venezuela and Thailand. Sliding window analysis of Tajima's D was performed for the Venezuelan 1997 population (i), the two Thai Tak province populations (ii; the solid line represents the Tak 1996 population and the dashed line represents the Tak 2007 population) and the Thai Chanthaburi population (iii). A window size of 100 and a step size of 3 were used. Horizontal dashed lines indicate the significance threshold (p = 0.05); a single asterisk indicates values for which p<0.05.



Figure S4.

Worldwide distribution of PvAMA1 40-mer haplotypes. Based on the analysis of the 40 NS amino acid polymorphism haplotypes, pie charts depicting the relative frequencies of the 219 haplotypes identified were drawn for each parasite population. Coloured segments indicate haplotypes that are present in more than one population; grey indicates haplotypes present in only one population. Only one haplotype was identical to reference strains (Belem/Palo Alto), therefore haplotypes from the remaining reference strains are shown in grey. Sample size and origin are indicated.



Figure S5.

Cluster membership of the P. vivax reference strains. Haplotypes analysed using the program Structure [61], [62] were found to be optimally distributed among eleven clusters (K = 11). Colours indicate the proportion of each reference strain (membership coefficient, Q) belonging to each of the different clusters identified.



Figure S6.

Network analysis of PvAMA1 haplotypes with a frequency >1. Haplotypes composed of 23 common amino acid polymorphisms with a frequency >1 were analysed using the Median Joining algorithm implemented in Phylogenetic Network version software. Coloured nodes represent the haplotypes and lines indicate connections between them. The size of each node indicates haplotype frequency.



Table S1.

Published Pvama1 sequences obtained from GenBank.



Table S2.

Summary of PvAMA1 polymorphisms. All 40-mer haplotypes for the 372 global sequences are summarised here. The polymorphic amino acid residue, and corresponding nucleotide polymorphism(s) are listed, as are the reference Sal-1 sequence and variant codons for each polymorphic site. Sites identical to the Sal-1 sequence are indicated by a dot. The number of sequences identical to Sal-1 at each polymorphic site are also listed. The 23 common polymorphisms are shown in bold.




The authors would like to thank the participating communities of Mugil and Wosera and the staff of the Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research for their involvement with this study. We thank G. A. Bentley and M. Foley for helpful discussions and data interpretation.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AEB JCR. Performed the experiments: AA. Analyzed the data: AA AEB PAR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: IM PAR. Wrote the paper: AA AEB JCR PAR. Provided logistical support: PS.


  1. 1. Guerra CA, Howes RE, Patil AP, Gething PW, Van Boeckel TP, et al. (2010) The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e774.
  2. 2. Genton B, D'Acremont V, Rare L, Baea K, Reeder JC, et al. (2008) Plasmodium vivax and mixed infections are associated with severe malaria in children: a prospective cohort study from Papua New Guinea. PLoS Med 5: e127.
  3. 3. Alexandre MA, Ferreira CO, Siqueira AM, Magalhaes BL, Mourao MP, et al. (2010) Severe Plasmodium vivax malaria, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg Infect Dis 16: 1611–1614.
  4. 4. Mueller I, Galinski MR, Baird JK, Carlton JM, Kochar DK, et al. (2009) Key gaps in the knowledge of Plasmodium vivax, a neglected human malaria parasite. Lancet Infect Dis 9: 555–566.
  5. 5. Feachem RGA, with A.A Phillips and G.A Targett (eds) (2009) Shrinking the Malaria Map: A Prospectus on Malaria Elimination. San Francisco: The Global Health Group, Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
  6. 6. Olivera-Ferreira J, Lacerda M, Brasil P, Ladislau JL, Tauil PL, et al. (2010) Malaria in Brazil: an overview. Malaria J 9: 115.
  7. 7. Kasehagen LJ, Mueller I, McNamara DT, Bockarie MJ, Kiniboro B, et al. (2006) Changing patterns of Plasmodium blood-stage infections in the Wosera region of Papua New Guinea monitored by light microscopy and high throughput PCR diagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 588–596.
  8. 8. Carme B, Ardillon V, Girod R, Grenier C, Joubert M, et al. (2009) Update on the epidemiology of malaria in French Guiana. Med Trop (Mars) 69: 19–25.
  9. 9. WHO (2012) World Malaria Report 2012. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
  10. 10. Carlton JM, Sina BJ, Adams JH (2011) Why is Plasmodium vivax a neglected tropical disease? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1160.
  11. 11. Remarque EJ, Faber BW, Kocken CH, Thomas AW (2008) Apical membrane antigen 1: a malaria vaccine candidate in review. Trends Parasitol 24: 74–84.
  12. 12. Bai T, Becker M, Gupta A, Strike P, Murphy VJ, et al. (2005) Structure of AMA1 from Plasmodium falciparum reveals a clustering of polymorphisms that surround a conserved hydrophobic pocket. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 12736–12741.
  13. 13. Galinski MR, Barnwell JW (2008) Plasmodium vivax: who cares? Malar J 7 Suppl 1: S9.
  14. 14. Hodder AN, Crewther PE, Matthew ML, Reid GE, Moritz RL, et al. (1996) The disulfide bond structure of Plasmodium apical membrane antigen-1. J Biol Chem 271: 29446–29452.
  15. 15. Alexander DL, Mital J, Ward GE, Bradley P, Boothroyd JC (2005) Identification of the moving junction complex of Toxoplasma gondii: a collaboration between distinct secretory organelles. PLoS Pathog 1: e17.
  16. 16. Lamarque M, Besteiro S, Papoin J, Roques M, Vulliez-Le Normand B, et al. (2011) The RON2-AMA1 interaction is a critical step in moving junction-dependent invasion by apicomplexan parasites. PLoS Pathog 7: e1001276.
  17. 17. Vulliez-Le Normand B, Tonkin ML, Lamarque MH, Langer S, Hoos S, et al. (2012) Structural and functional insights into the malaria parasite moving junction complex. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002755.
  18. 18. Mital J, Meissner M, Soldati D, Ward GE (2005) Conditional expression of Toxoplasma gondii apical membrane antigen-1 (TgAMA1) demonstrates that TgAMA1 plays a critical role in host cell invasion. Mol Biol Cell 16: 4341–4349.
  19. 19. Olivieri A, Collins CR, Hackett F, Withers-Martinez C, Marshall J, et al. (2011) Juxtamembrane shedding of Plasmodium falciparum AMA1 is sequence independent and essential, and helps evade invasion-inhibitory antibodies. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002448.
  20. 20. Mitchell GH, Thomas AW, Margos G, Dluzewski AR, Bannister LH (2004) Apical membrane antigen 1, a major malaria vaccine candidate, mediates the close attachment of invasive merozoites to host red blood cells. Infect Immun 72: 154–158.
  21. 21. Howell SA, Well I, Fleck SL, Kettleborough C, Collins CR, et al. (2003) A single malaria merozoite serine protease mediates shedding of multiple surface proteins by juxtamembrane cleavage. J Biol Chem 278: 23890–23898.
  22. 22. Mufalo BC, Gentil F, Bargieri DY, Costa FT, Rodrigues MM, et al. (2008) Plasmodium vivax apical membrane antigen-1: comparative recognition of different domains by antibodies induced during natural human infection. Microbes Infect 10: 1266–1273.
  23. 23. Gentil F, Bargieri DY, Leite JA, Francoso KS, Patricio MB, et al. (2010) A recombinant vaccine based on domain II of Plasmodium vivax Apical Membrane Antigen 1 induces high antibody titres in mice. Vaccine 28: 6183–6190.
  24. 24. Hodder AN, Crewther PE, Anders RF (2001) Specificity of the protective antibody response to apical membrane antigen 1. Infect Immun 69: 3286–3294.
  25. 25. Kennedy MC, Wang J, Zhang Y, Miles AP, Chitsaz F, et al. (2002) In vitro studies with recombinant Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1): production and activity of an AMA1 vaccine and generation of a multiallelic response. Infect Immun 70: 6948–6960.
  26. 26. Kocken CH, Withers-Martinez C, Dubbeld MA, van der Wel A, Hackett F, et al. (2002) High-level expression of the malaria blood-stage vaccine candidate Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 and induction of antibodies that inhibit erythrocyte invasion. Infect Immun 70: 4471–4476.
  27. 27. Coley AM, Gupta A, Murphy VJ, Bai T, Kim H, et al. (2007) Structure of the malaria antigen AMA1 in complex with a growth-inhibitory antibody. PLoS Pathog 3: 1308–1319.
  28. 28. Macraild CA, Anders RF, Foley M, Norton RS (2011) Apical membrane antigen 1 as an anti-malarial drug target. Curr Top Med Chem 11: 2039–2047.
  29. 29. Ord RL, Tami A, Sutherland CJ (2008) ama1 genes of sympatric Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum from Venezuela differ significantly in genetic diversity and recombination frequency. PLoS One 3: e3366.
  30. 30. Escalante AA, Grebert HM, Chaiyaroj SC, Magris M, Biswas S, et al. (2001) Polymorphism in the gene encoding the apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) of Plasmodium falciparum. X. Asembo Bay Cohort Project. Mol Biochem Parasitol 113: 279–287.
  31. 31. Polley SD, Conway DJ (2001) Strong diversifying selection on domains of the Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 gene. Genetics 158: 1505–1512.
  32. 32. Gunasekera AM, Wickramarachchi T, Neafsey DE, Ganguli I, Perera L, et al. (2007) Genetic diversity and selection at the Plasmodium vivax apical membrane antigen-1 (PvAMA-1) locus in a Sri Lankan population. Mol Biol Evol 24: 939–947.
  33. 33. Moon SU, Na BK, Kang JM, Kim JY, Cho SH, et al. (2010) Genetic polymorphism and effect of natural selection at domain I of apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Myanmar. Acta Trop 114: 71–75.
  34. 34. Rodrigues MH, Rodrigues KM, Oliveira TR, Comodo AN, Rodrigues MM, et al. (2005) Antibody response of naturally infected individuals to recombinant Plasmodium vivax apical membrane antigen-1. Int J Parasitol 35: 185–192.
  35. 35. Figtree M, Pasay CJ, Slade R, Cheng Q, Cloonan N, et al. (2000) Plasmodium vivax synonymous substitution frequencies, evolution and population structure deduced from diversity in AMA 1 and MSP 1 genes. Mol Biochem Parasitol 108: 53–66.
  36. 36. Remarque EJ, Faber BW, Kocken CH, Thomas AW (2008) A diversity-covering approach to immunization with Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 induces broader allelic recognition and growth inhibition responses in rabbits. Infect Immun 76: 2660–2670.
  37. 37. Coley AM, Parisi K, Masciantonio R, Hoeck J, Casey JL, et al. (2006) The most polymorphic residue on Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 determines binding of an invasion-inhibitory antibody. Infect Immun 74: 2628–2636.
  38. 38. Takala SL, Coulibaly D, Thera MA, Batchelor AH, Cummings MP, et al. (2009) Extreme polymorphism in a vaccine antigen and risk of clinical malaria: implications for vaccine development. Sci Transl Med 1: 2ra5.
  39. 39. Conway DJ, Cavanagh DR, Tanabe K, Roper C, Mikes ZS, et al. (2000) A principal target of human immunity to malaria identified by molecular population genetic and immunological analyses. Nat Med 6: 689–692.
  40. 40. Weedall GD, Conway DJ (2010) Detecting signatures of balancing selection to identify targets of anti-parasite immunity. Trends Parasitol 26: 363–369.
  41. 41. Mueller I, Widmer S, Michel D, Maraga S, McNamara DT, et al. (2009) High sensitivity detection of Plasmodium species reveals positive correlations between infections of different species, shifts in age distribution and reduced local variation in Papua New Guinea. Malar J 8: 41.
  42. 42. Koepfli C, Antao T, Barry A, Timinao L, SIba P, et al. (2013) A large Plasmodium vivax reservoir and little population structure in the South Pacific. PLoS One 8: e66041.
  43. 43. Schultz L, Wapling J, Mueller I, Ntsuke PO, Senn N, et al. (2010) Multilocus haplotypes reveal variable levels of diversity and population structure of Plasmodium falciparum in Papua New Guinea, a region of intense perennial transmission. Malar J 9: 336.
  44. 44. Arnott A, Barnadas C, Senn N, Siba P, Mueller I, et al. (2013) High genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax on the north coast of Papua New Guinea. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89: 188–94.
  45. 45. Koepfli C, Ross A, Kiniboro B, Smith TA, Zimmerman PA, et al. (2011) Multiplicity and diversity of Plasmodium vivax infections in a highly endemic region in Papua New Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1424.
  46. 46. Cheng Q, Saul A (1994) Sequence analysis of the apical membrane antigen I (AMA-1) of Plasmodium vivax. Mol Biochem Parasitol 65: 183–187.
  47. 47. Gene Codes Corporation Sequencher® version 5.0 sequence analysis software. Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  48. 48. Putaporntip C, Jongwutiwes S, Grynberg P, Cui L, Hughes AL (2009) Nucleotide sequence polymorphism at the apical membrane antigen-1 locus reveals population history of Plasmodium vivax in Thailand. Infect Genet Evol 9: 1295–1300.
  49. 49. Rajesh V, Elamaran M, Vidya S, Gowrishankar M, Kochar D, et al. (2007) Plasmodium vivax: genetic diversity of the apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) in isolates from India. Exp Parasitol 116: 252–256.
  50. 50. Ntumngia FB, McHenry AM, Barnwell JW, Cole-Tobian J, King CL, et al. (2009) Genetic variation among Plasmodium vivax isolates adapted to non-human primates and the implication for vaccine development. Am J Trop Med Hyg 80: 218–227.
  51. 51. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739.
  52. 52. Glaubitz JC (2004) convert: A user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 309–310.
  53. 53. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452.
  54. 54. Nei M, Gojobori T (1986) Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3: 418–426.
  55. 55. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585–595.
  56. 56. Nobrega de Sousa T, Carvalho LH, Alves de Brito CF (2011) Worldwide genetic variability of the Duffy binding protein: insights into Plasmodium vivax vaccine development. PLoS One 6: e22944.
  57. 57. Cockerham CC, Weir BS (1984) Covariances of relatives stemming from a population undergoing mixed self and random mating. Biometrics 40: 157–164.
  58. 58. Cockerham CC (1973) Analyses of gene frequencies. Genetics 74: 679–700.
  59. 59. Rousset F (2008) genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103–106.
  60. 60. Raymond MR (1995) F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicis. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249.
  61. 61. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
  62. 62. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1322–1332.
  63. 63. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620.
  64. 64. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16: 37–48.
  65. 65. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234: 779–815.
  66. 66. Dutta S, Lee SY, Batchelor AH, Lanar DE (2007) Structural basis of antigenic escape of a malaria vaccine candidate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 12488–12493.
  67. 67. Dutta S, Dlugosz LS, Clayton JW, Pool CD, Haynes JD, et al. (2010) Alanine mutagenesis of the primary antigenic escape residue cluster, c1, of apical membrane antigen 1. Infect Immun 78: 661–671.
  68. 68. Crabb BS, Beeson JG, Amino R, Menard R, Waters A, et al. (2012) Perspectives: The missing pieces. Nature 484: S22–23.
  69. 69. Neafsey DE, Galinsky K, Jiang RH, Young L, Sykes SM, et al. (2012) The malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax exhibits greater genetic diversity than Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet 44: 1046–50.
  70. 70. Osier FH, Weedall GD, Verra F, Murungi L, Tetteh KK, et al. (2010) Allelic diversity and naturally acquired allele-specific antibody responses to Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 in Kenya. Infect Immun 78: 4625–4633.
  71. 71. Gething PW, Elyazar IR, Moyes CL, Smith DL, Battle KE, et al. (2012) A long neglected world malaria map: Plasmodium vivax endemicity in 2010. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1814.
  72. 72. Chenet SM, Schneider KA, Villegas L, Escalante AA (2012) Local population structure of Plasmodium: impact on malaria control and elimination. Malar J 11: 412.
  73. 73. Jongwutiwes S, Putaporntip C, Iwasaki T, Ferreira MU, Kanbara H, et al. (2005) Mitochondrial genome sequences support ancient population expansion in Plasmodium vivax. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1733–1739.
  74. 74. Grynberg P, Fontes CJ, Hughes AL, Braga EM (2008) Polymorphism at the apical membrane antigen 1 locus reflects the world population history of Plasmodium vivax. BMC Evol Biol 8: 123.
  75. 75. Dias S, Longacre S, Escalante AA, Udagama-Randeniya PV (2011) Genetic diversity and recombination at the C-terminal fragment of the merozoite surface protein-1 of Plasmodium vivax (PvMSP-1) in Sri Lanka. Infect Genet Evol 11: 145–156.
  76. 76. Kocken CH, Narum DL, Massougbodji A, Ayivi B, Dubbeld MA, et al. (2000) Molecular characterisation of Plasmodium reichenowi apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1), comparison with P. falciparum AMA-1, and antibody-mediated inhibition of red cell invasion. Mol Biochem Parasitol 109: 147–156.
  77. 77. Chesne-Seck ML, Pizarro JC, Vulliez-Le Normand B, Collins CR, Blackman MJ, et al. (2005) Structural comparison of apical membrane antigen 1 orthologues and paralogues in apicomplexan parasites. Mol Biochem Parasitol 144: 55–67.
  78. 78. Taylor JE, Pacheco MA, Bacon DJ, Beg MA, Machado RL, et al. (2013) The Evolutionary History of Plasmodium vivax as Inferred from Mitochondrial Genomes: Parasite Genetic Diversity in the Americas. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2050–2064.
  79. 79. Zakeri S, Sadeghi H, Mehrizi AA, Djadid ND (2013) Population genetic structure and polymorphism analysis of gene encoding apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) of Iranian Plasmodium vivax wild isolates. Acta Trop 126: 269–79.
  80. 80. Dias S, Somarathna M, Manamperi A, Escalante AA, Gunasekera AM, et al. (2011) Evaluation of the genetic diversity of domain II of Plasmodium vivax Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (PvAMA-1) and the ensuing strain-specific immune responses in patients from Sri Lanka. Vaccine 29: 7491–7504.
  81. 81. Duan J, Mu J, Thera MA, Joy D, Kosakovsky Pond SL, et al. (2008) Population structure of the genes encoding the polymorphic Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1: implications for vaccine design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 7857–7862.
  82. 82. Barry AE, Schultz L, Buckee CO, Reeder JC (2009) Contrasting population structures of the genes encoding ten leading vaccine-candidate antigens of the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One 4: e8497.
  83. 83. Mu J, Joy DA, Duan J, Huang Y, Carlton J, et al. (2005) Host switch leads to emergence of Plasmodium vivax malaria in humans. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1686–1693.
  84. 84. Mueller I, Genton B, Betuela I, Alpers MP (2010) Vaccines against malaria: perspectives from Papua New Guinea. Hum Vaccin 6: 17–20.
  85. 85. Dempwolff O (1904) Bericht über eine Malaria-Expedition nach Deutsch-Neu- Guinea. Zeitsohr f Hyg u Infectionskrankh 47: 81–132.
  86. 86. Rosanas-Urgell A, Lin E, Manning L, Rarau P, Laman M, et al. (2012) Reduced risk of Plasmodium vivax malaria in Papua New Guinean children with Southeast Asian ovalocytosis in two cohorts and a case-control study. PLoS Med 9: e1001305.
  87. 87. Drew DR, Hodder AN, Wilson DW, Foley M, Mueller I, et al. (2012) Defining the antigenic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 and the requirements for a multi-allele vaccine against malaria. PLoS One 7: e51023.
  88. 88. Thera MA, Doumbo OK, Coulibaly D, Laurens MB, Ouattara A, et al. (2011) A field trial to assess a blood-stage malaria vaccine. N Engl J Med 365: 1004–1013.
  89. 89. Schwartz L, Brown GV, Genton B, Moorthy VS (2012) A review of malaria vaccine clinical projects based on the WHO rainbow table. Malar J 11: 11.