Figures
Abstract
Dengue virus (DENV) is the leading cause of arboviral diseases in humans worldwide. The envelope (E) protein of DENV is the major target of neutralizing antibodies (Abs). Previous studies have shown that a significant proportion of anti-E Abs in human serum after DENV infection recognize the highly conserved fusion loop (FL) of E protein. The role of anti-FL Abs in protection against subsequent DENV infection versus pathogenesis remains unclear. A human anti-E monoclonal Ab was used as a standard in a virion-capture ELISA to measure the concentration of anti-E Abs, [anti-E Abs], in dengue-immune sera from Nicaraguan patients collected 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-infection. The proportion of anti-FL Abs was determined by capture ELISA using virus-like particles containing mutations in FL, and the concentration of anti-FL Abs, [anti-FL Abs], was calculated. Neutralization titers (NT50) were determined using a previously described flow cytometry-based assay. Analysis of sequential samples from 10 dengue patients revealed [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] were higher in secondary than in primary DENV infections. While [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with NT50 against the current infecting serotype, it correlated with NT50 against the serotypes to which patients had likely not yet been exposed (“non-exposed” serotypes) in 14 secondary DENV3 and 15 secondary DENV2 cases. These findings demonstrate the kinetics of anti-FL Abs and provide evidence that anti-FL Abs play a protective role against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection.
Author Summary
The four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV) are the leading cause of mosquito-borne viral diseases in humans. Whereas infection with one DENV serotype is thought to confer protection against re-infection with that serotype, it can be either protective or enhance disease severity upon subsequent (“secondary”) infection with a different serotype. The envelope (E) protein of DENV is the major target of neutralizing antibodies. Previously, we and others reported that a significant proportion of anti-E antibodies in human dengue-immune sera recognize the fusion loop (FL) of E protein. The role of anti-FL antibodies in protection against subsequent DENV infections versus pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we developed capture ELISAs to measure the concentrations of anti-E and anti-FL antibodies in sera of Nicaraguan dengue patients collected 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-illness, and investigated the kinetics of these antibodies and their relationship to neutralization activity. While the concentrations of anti-FL antibodies did not correlate with 50% neutralization titers (NT50) against the current infecting serotype, it correlated with NT50 against serotypes to which patients had likely not yet been exposed (“non-exposed” serotypes) in secondary DENV infections. These findings provide evidence that anti-FL antibodies play a protective role against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection.
Citation: Lai C-Y, Williams KL, Wu Y-C, Knight S, Balmaseda A, Harris E, et al. (2013) Analysis of Cross-Reactive Antibodies Recognizing the Fusion Loop of Envelope Protein and Correlation with Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Nicaraguan Dengue Cases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7(9): e2451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002451
Editor: Scott F. Michael, Florida Gulf Coast University, United States of America
Received: December 17, 2012; Accepted: August 14, 2013; Published: September 19, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Lai et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by R01 AI085607 (EH) from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Cooperative Research Agreement from International Vaccine Institute/Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative (WKW), the start-up fund from JABSOM (WKW) and the grant P20GM103516 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH (WKW). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV1–4) are the leading cause of arboviral diseases in humans in tropical and subtropical regions [1], [2]. It has been estimated that more than 3 billion people in over 100 countries are at risk of infection and 50–100 million DENV infections occur annually worldwide [1], [2]. The clinical presentation after DENV infection ranges from asymptomatic infection to a self-limited illness, dengue fever (DF), to severe and potentially life-threatening disease, dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS) [1], [2]. While considerable efforts have been made to develop interventions, currently there is no licensed vaccine or antiviral therapeutic against dengue available [3].
DENV belongs to the genus Flavivirus in the family Flaviviridae. It contains a positive-sense RNA genome of approximately 11 kilobases in length. Flanked by the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions, the genome has a single open reading frame encoding a polyprotein precursor, which is cleaved by cellular and viral proteases into three structural proteins, the capsid, precursor membrane (prM) and envelope (E), and seven non-structural proteins [4]. The E protein forms 90 “head-to-tail” homodimers on the surface of mature virions [4]–[6]. The E protein participates in virus entry and is the major target of neutralizing antibodies (Abs) [3], [4]. In the presence of non-neutralizing or suboptimal concentrations of neutralizing anti-E Abs, DENV replicates to higher titers in human Fcγ receptor-bearing cells in vitro, a phenomenon known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) [7]–[9]. The ectodomain of E protein contains three domains [10]. Domain II contains an internal fusion loop (FL) that is involved in membrane fusion. Domain III is believed to participate in receptor binding [4], [10], [11].
In the genus Flavivirus, there are several serocomplexes, including DENV, Japanese-encephalitis virus, and tick-borne encephalitis virus serocomplexes. Abs that recognize members from different serocomplexes, members within a serocomplex, or a single member are called flavivirus group-reactive, complex-reactive, or type-specific, respectively [12]. Previous studies of polyclonal human sera revealed that a significant proportion of anti-E Abs after DENV infection was group-reactive and recognized the FL of domain II, whereas only a minor proportion was type-specific and recognized E domain III [13]–[16]. The change in the amount of anti-FL Abs over time and the role of anti-FL Abs in dengue protection versus pathogenesis remain unclear. Following primary DENV infection, individuals develop monotypic neutralizing Abs against the infecting serotype [9]. A recent study on depletion of human sera by recombinant E protein has shown that cross-reactive Abs (including anti-FL Abs) do not contribute substantially to monotypic neutralization against the infecting serotype after primary DENV infection [17]. After secondary DENV infection, individuals develop not only neutralizing Abs against serotypes to which they have been previously exposed but also cross-reactive neutralizing Abs against serotypes to which they have not yet been exposed (“non-exposed” serotypes) [9]. The nature of such heterotypic neutralizing Abs remains unknown. We hypothesize that the cross-reactive anti-FL Abs may play a role in protection against the non-exposed serotypes after secondary infection.
In this study, we developed a DENV virion-capture ELISA to measure the concentrations of anti-E Abs, [anti-E Abs], against DENV in sera, determined the proportion of anti-FL Abs (% anti-FL Abs) by a previously-described capture ELISA using virus-like particles (VLPs) [14], [16], and calculated the concentrations of anti-FL Abs, [anti-FL Abs]. We examined the changes of [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] over time in sequential serum samples from 10 cases of primary or secondary DENV infection and then measured the [anti-FL Abs] in 26 additional secondary DENV infections. While [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with NT50 against the current infecting serotype, it correlated with neutralization titers against likely “non-exposed” serotypes in 29 secondary infections. These findings support our hypothesis that anti-FL Abs may play a protective role against the “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement and human sera
Thirty-six laboratory-confirmed dengue patients, who were admitted to the Hospital Infantil Manuel de Jesús Rivera in Managua, Nicaragua between October 2006 and October 2008 and followed up for 18 months, were selected arbitrarily for the analysis. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of California, Berkeley, and the Nicaraguan Ministry of Health. Parents or legal guardians of all subjects provided written informed consent, and subjects 6 years of age and older provided assent. DENV infection was confirmed by detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR directed to the capsid region [18], [19]; virus isolation in C6/36 cells [20]; IgM seroconversion between acute and convalescent-phase samples; and/or a ≥4-fold increase in total anti-DENV Abs between acute and convalescent-phase samples as measured by Inhibition ELISA [19], [21]. Primary DENV infection was defined by an Ab titer by Inhibition ELISA [21] of <10 in acute samples or <2,560 in convalescent (day 14) samples, while secondary infection was defined by an Ab titer by Inhibition ELISA of ≥10 in acute samples or ≥2,560 in convalescent samples [22]. Disease severity was classified according to the 1997 World Health Organization Guidelines [23].
Proportion of anti-FL Abs determined by capture ELISA using wild type (WT) and mutant VLPs
The plasmids expressing prM/E proteins of DENV1 (Hawaii strain, pCB-D1) and DENV2 (strain 16681) were used to generate WT and mutant VLPs containing mutations at critical FL residues (W101A plus F108A) as described previously [16], [24]. VLPs derived from ultracentrifugation of culture supernatants of transfectants of 293T cells were used in a capture ELISA as described previously [14], [16]. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with rabbit anti-serum against DENV1 at 4°C overnight, followed by blocking with 1% BSA in 1× PBS for 1 hour. VLPs and mutant VLPs (at ∼0.01 µg/ml) were added, followed by two-fold serial dilutions (using dilution buffer) of each human serum sample, anti-human IgG conjugated to horseradish-peroxidase (HRP), TMB substrate and stop solution [16]. The absorbance at a wavelength of 450 nm (OD 450) with reference wavelength of 650 nm was read. The endpoint titers were calculated as the reciprocal of the highest titers that yielded a signal greater than 3 standard deviations of the mean signal from multiple (n = 5) normal human sera. The proportion of anti-FL Abs was determined by the formula: % anti-FL Abs = [1 - endpoint titer to mutant VLPs/endpoint titer to WT VLPs]×100% [14]. Mixtures of mAbs containing different proportions of a mouse anti-FL mAb (FL0231) and a mouse anti-E domain III mAb (DA6-7) in the VLP-capture ELISA revealed a linear relationship between the proportion of FL0231 (anti-FL mAb) added and the measured proportion of FL0231 (P = 0.003, two-tailed Spearman correlation test) (Figure S1). The limit of detection was 4% based on the experiment of mixing mAbs (Figure S1).
Concentration of anti-E Abs determined by virion-capture ELISA
The virion-capture ELISA was performed similarly to the VLP-capture ELISA except that DENV1 (Hawaii strain) virions derived from ultracentrifugation of culture supernatants of infected Vero cells were used as antigen. Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with rabbit anti-serum against DENV1 at 4°C overnight, followed by blocking with 1% BSA in 1× PBS for 1 hour and adding DENV1 virions (at ∼0.01 µg/ml). To determine the [anti-E Abs], the virion capture-ELISA was initially performed using two-fold serial dilutions of each serum to identify the dilution that gave rise to OD values within the linear range of the standard curve (from 6.6 to 105.63 ng/ml), based on known concentrations of a human mAb 82.11 that targets the FL epitope (Figure 1A) [25]. Then the virion capture-ELISA was performed using such serum dilution in parallel to mAb 82.11 (from 1.65 to 6760 ng/ml) in duplicates. The OD values were interpolated to determine the [anti-E Abs] in each human serum sample (Figure 1B) (GraphPad Prism 5.0, GraphPad software Inc., CA).
(A) Virion-capture ELISA was performed using serial dilutions of a human mAb 82.11 with known concentrations to generate a standard curve. (B) Sequential human serum samples from a dengue patient were tested simultaneously with the standard and the OD values were interpolated to determine [anti-E Abs]. Data are means with standard deviation of duplicates from one representative experiment of two. (C) The binding specificity of mAb 82.11 was determined by Western blot analysis using cell lysates collected from Vero cells infected with mock, DENV1 (Hawaii strain), DENV2 (NGC strain), DENV3 (H87 strain), DENV4 (H241 strain) or WNV (NY99 strain) [16]. The NT50 [25] and dissociation constant (Kd) of mAb 82.11 are summarized on the right. The viron-capture ELISA of DENV1, DENV2 and DENV3 was performed using serial dilutions of mAb 82.11; the Kd was determined using the program GraphPad Prism 5.0. Data are means of duplicates from one representative experiment of two. ND, not done.
Neutralization test
The 50% neutralization titer (NT50) was determined using a flow cytometry-based neutralization assay with reporter viral particles (RVPs) of four different DENV serotypes as described previously [26]. Briefly, eight 3-fold dilutions of each serum sample were mixed with DENV RVPs (a GFP DENV reporter replicon packaged by DENV structural proteins C-prM/M-E expressed in trans) [26], [27] and incubated with human Raji-DC-SIGNR cells for 48 hours. GFP-positive infected cells were quantified by flow cytometry, and raw data extracted using FlowJo software, version 7.2.5 (TreeStar Software) was graphed in the GraphPad Prism 5.0 program as percent infection versus the log of the reciprocal serum dilution. A sigmoidal dose response curve with a variable slope was then generated to determine NT50, the Ab dilution at which a 50% reduction in infection was observed compared to the no-Ab control [26], [28]. For patients with secondary DENV infection, the current infecting serotype was identified by RT-PCR and/or virus isolation, and the previous infecting serotype(s) were determined based on the neutralization pattern, the epidemiology of dominant DENV serotype circulation in Nicaragua, and the age of the patients [29]. For each patient, the remaining serotypes were considered as likely “non-exposed serotypes”.
Statistical analysis
The two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the difference in [anti-FL Abs] and [anti-E Abs] among primary and secondary DENV infections. The one-tailed Spearman correlation test was used to determine the relationship between [anti-FL Abs] and NT50 using the program GraphPad Prism 5.0. The two-tailed Spearman correlation test was used to determine the relationship between the proportion of anti-FL mAb FL0231 added and that measured in the VLP-ELISA.
Results
Determination of [anti-E Abs], [anti-FL Abs] and % anti-FL Abs in human sera
We first developed a virion-capture ELISA using known concentrations of a human anti-E mAb, 82.11, to generate a standard curve (Figure 1A) [25]; the OD values derived from human sera in the same capture ELISA were interpolated to determine [anti-E Abs] (Figure 1B). MAb 82.11 bound to the E protein of the four DENV serotypes equivalently, as shown by Western blot analysis and virion-capture ELISA (Figure 1C), which is in agreement with previous reports of its neutralization potency against the four DENV serotypes at comparable concentration [25]. Table 1 summarizes the [anti-E Abs] in sera collected longitudinally 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-illness from 6 confirmed dengue cases with primary DENV infection and 4 dengue cases with secondary infection. The [anti-E Abs] ranged from 5.8 to 158.8 µg/ml and 58.8 to 1894.9 µg/ml in primary and secondary DENV infections, respectively.
We next employed a previously-described VLP-capture ELISA using DENV1 WT and mutant VLPs containing representative FL mutations (W101A plus F108A) to determine the % anti-FL Abs in each serum sample [14], [16]. As shown in Figure 2A, the % anti-FL Abs in the 3-month post-illness serum of a secondary DENV2 case (ID 237) was 57%. We also examined the same serum by using DENV2 WT and mutant VLPs (W101A plus F108A) in the VLP-capture ELISA, and the % anti-FL Abs was found to be 56%. The % anti-FL Abs determined by DENV1 and DENV2 VLP-capture ELISA was similar in the 6-month and 18-month sera of ID237 and in the sera of other cases as well (Figure S2). This finding is consistent with the notion that the FL residues recognized by anti-FL Abs are highly conserved by different flaviviruses, and therefore the % anti-FL Abs determined by VLPs of different DENV serotypes was similar. We thus used DENV1 VLP-capture ELISA to determine the % anti-FL Abs for all sera in this study. Table 1 summarizes the % anti-FL Abs in sequential serum samples from 10 cases, which ranged from 4 to 63%. After determining the % anti-FL Abs we calculated the [anti-FL Abs], which ranged from 0 to 0.94 µg/ml (Table 1).
(A) Serial dilutions of the serum were subjected to a capture ELISA using DENV1 WT and mutant VLPs containing mutations in the FL epitope (W101A+F108A). The bar graph displaying results from an anti-E ELISA shows that comparable amounts of WT and mutant VLPs were added based on recognition of E by pooled human dengue-immune sera. % anti-FL Abs = [1 – endpoint titer to mutant VLPs/endpoint titer to WT VLPs]×100%. (B) The same serum was subjected to a capture ELISA using DENV2 WT and mutant VLPs (W101A+F108A). Data are presented as in (A). Data are means with standard deviation of duplicates from one representative experiment of two. For endpoint titers, only means are shown.
Kinetics of [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] over time
As shown in Figure 3A, the [anti-E Abs] in most cases slightly decreased from 3 months to 6 months after infection except one DHF case, ID 274, that displayed peak anti-E Abs 6 months after infection. There was no difference in [anti-E Abs] between 6 and 12 months and between 12 and 18 months among primary DENV infections (P = 0.66 and 1, respectively) and secondary infections (P = 0.4 and 0.88, respectively, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). The [anti-E Abs] was higher in secondary infections than in primary infections (P = 0.02, 0.07, 0.01 and 0.06, at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). A similar trend in the [anti-FL Abs] was noted, again except ID 274, where [anti-FL Abs] peaked 6 months after infection (Figure 3B). The [anti-FL Abs] was also significantly higher in secondary as compared to primary DENV infections (P = 0.02, 0.04, 0.04 and 0.03, at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). Notably, two cases, ID312 (primary DENV1 infection) and ID265 (primary DENV3 infection), had undetectable anti-FL Abs 12 months after infection.
(A) [anti-E Abs] and (B) [anti-FL Abs] in samples collected 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post-infection. Green closed symbols, patients with primary DENV infection; red open symbols, patients with secondary DENV infection.
Relationship between anti-FL Abs and neutralizing Abs in secondary DENV infections
We then examined the [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs and [anti-FL Abs] in sera collected 12 months post-illness from another 26 patients with secondary DENV infection (Table S1). Of the total of 30 secondary DENV infections, 13 were classified as DF and 17 as DHF/DSS. No significant difference was observed in the [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs or [anti-FL Abs] at 12 months post-infection between DF and DHF/DSS patients (P = 0.48, 0.79, and 0.43, respectively, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test), although the number of cases examined was small.
We next measured neutralizing Abs in each serum sample against the four DENV serotypes using a previously described flow cytometry-based assay with DENV RVPs [26]. The NT50 in 12-month sera from the 30 secondary DENV infections (15 DENV2, 14 DENV3 and 1 DENV1) are summarized in Table 2. For each patient, the previous infecting serotypes were determined based on the neutralization pattern, the epidemiological history of dominant DENV serotype circulation in Nicaragua, and the age of the patient [29]. The serotypes excluding the current and previous infecting serotype(s) were considered as likely “non-exposed serotypes”.
We then examined the relationship between [anti-FL Abs] and NT50 12 months post-infection in patients with secondary DENV infection. [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with the NT50 against the current infecting serotype (Figures 4A and 4E). However, [anti-FL Abs] did correlate with the NT50 against the likely “non-exposed” serotypes (DENV4 and DENV2 and DENV1) for patients with secondary DENV3 infection (P = 0.01, P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively, one-tailed Spearman correlation test) (Figures 4B to 4D). For patients with secondary DENV2 infection, [anti-FL Abs] correlated with the NT50 against the “non-exposed” serotypes (DENV4 and DENV3) but not DENV1, likely due to the small sample size of this subgroup (P = 0.03, P = 0.04 and P = 0.13, respectively, one-tailed Spearman correlation test) (Figures 4F to 4H).
The current infecting serotype, previous infecting serotype(s) and “non-exposed serotypes” were determined as described in Methods. [anti-FL Abs] and NT50 against the current infecting serotype (A, E) and “non-exposed” serotypes (B to D, F to H) in patients with secondary DENV3 (A to D) and secondary DENV2 (E to H) infections.
Discussion
We and others have previously reported that a significant proportion of anti-E Abs in human dengue-immune sera recognize the highly conserved FL residues in domain II of E protein, whereas a small proportion of anti-E Abs recognize E domain III residues [13]–[16]. The role of anti-FL Abs in protection against subsequent infections and/or dengue pathogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we first developed capture ELISAs to measure the [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] in sera from dengue patients to investigate the kinetics of anti-E Abs and anti-FL Abs over time and found that [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] were quite stable across time and were higher in secondary DENV infections than in primary infections. We then examined the relationship between [anti-FL Abs] and NT50 in patients with secondary DENV infection. While [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with NT50 against the current infecting serotype, it correlated with NT50 against likely “non-exposed” serotypes (DENV4, DENV2 and DENV1) in 14 secondary DENV3 cases and “non-exposed” serotypes (DENV4 and DENV3) in 15 secondary DENV2 cases. These findings suggest that anti-FL Abs may play a protective role against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection.
It is known that after primary DENV infection, individuals develop life-long protection against the infecting serotype, which correlates with the appearance of monotypic neutralizing Abs against the infecting serotype [30]–[34]. The type-specific anti-E neutralizing Abs rather than the group-reactive anti-FL Abs generated after primary infection are believed to contribute to such monotypic neutralizing activity. This concept was supported by the observation that the monotypic neutralizing activity in human sera after primary infection was greatly reduced by depleting type-specific binding activity with virions of the infecting serotype but was not substantially reduced by depleting cross-reactive binding activity (including anti-FL Abs) with virions of other serotypes [17]. Consistent with this, we found that [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with NT50 against the infecting serotype in patients with primary DENV infection (data not shown). The nature of the type-specific anti-E neutralizing Abs, which were initially thought to be those targeting E domain III based on the studies of anti-domain III mAbs [35]–[38], were recently reported to be those targeting quaternary epitopes spanning adjacent E dimers on the virion or possibly other as yet to be identified epitopes [17], [39].
After secondary DENV infection, individuals develop not only neutralizing Abs against serotypes to which they have been previously exposed but also heterotypic neutralizing Abs against serotypes to which they have not yet been exposed [9]. The heterotypic neutralizing Abs are believed to account for heterotypic protection against subsequent infection by non-experienced serotypes and contribute to the very low numbers of hospital admission observed after a third or fourth DENV infection in humans [40] as well as the low rate of viremia after a third DENV infection in monkeys [41]–[44]. The nature of such heterotypic neutralizing Abs remains unknown. One possibility is that some complex-reactive anti-E Abs contribute to the neutralizing activities against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary infection. Alternatively, the group-reactive anti-FL Abs generated after secondary DENV infection may contribute to such neutralizing activity. Our findings that [anti-FL Abs] correlated with NT50 against likely “non-exposed serotypes” in secondary cases suggest that anti-FL Abs contribute significantly to heterotypic neutralizing activity against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection. Nonetheless, it is likely that such heterotypic neutralizing Abs against “non-exposed” serotypes include other non-FL cross-reactive Abs as well.
The epitopes recognized by anti-FL Abs include several key residues such as 101W, 106G, 107L and 108F in the FL of E domain II [16], [45], which are highly conserved by different flaviviruses and absolutely conserved by the four DENV serotypes. It is conceivable that during secondary DENV infection, memory B cells recognizing these highly conserved FL residues expand and generate anti-FL Abs with higher avidity through affinity maturation [46]. Consistent with this, studies of human sera after DENV infection, which likely contained a significant proportion of anti-FL Abs, showed that the binding avidity of anti-DENV Abs from secondary infections was higher than that from primary infections [28], [47]. Moreover, it was reported recently that cross-reactive memory B cells or plasma cells as well as serum avidity increase greatly during acute secondary DENV infection, with greater reactivity to the previous infecting serotype than the current infecting serotype [28], [48]. Future studies involving experiments that remove cross-reactive anti-FL Abs from the sera of secondary DENV infections and examine the neutralizing activity against “non-exposed” serotypes will help to further elucidate the contribution of anti-FL Abs to heterotypic neutralizing activity. It is worth noting that while anti-FL Abs are cross-reactive to all four DENV serotypes, [anti-FL Abs] did not correlate with NT50 against the current infecting serotype (Figures 4A and 4E). This suggests that type-specific or other non-FL Abs probably dominate the neutralizing activity against the current infecting serotype.
In this study, we used known concentrations of a human anti-E mAb (82.11) as a standard in our quantitative virion-capture ELISA to measure [anti-E Abs] in human sera. MAb 82.11, which recognizes FL residues and is a group-reactive neutralizing Ab against four DENV serotypes [25, data not shown], was used as a reference for anti-E Abs in human sera because group-reactive anti-FL Abs constitute a significant proportion of anti-E Abs in human serum. The possibility that some anti-E Abs had different binding properties to the DENV virion compared with 82.11 and were thus over- or under-estimated in the quantification cannot be completely ruled out. To further validate the use of DENV1 virion- and VLP-capture in determining the [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs and [anti-FL Abs] in this study, we used DENV3′ virion- and VLP-capture ELISA systems to determine the [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs and [anti-FL Abs] in 14 DENV3 infection samples, and found a nice correlation with these three values determined by the two systems (DENV1 vs. DENV3: r = 0.91, P<0.0001; r = 0.78, P = 0.0009; and r = 0.74, P = 0.0027, respectively, two-tailed Spearman correlation test) (Figure S3). In addition, we determined the [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs and [anti-FL Abs] of 7 DENV2 infection samples using DENV2 virion- and VLP-capture ELISA systems, yielding a good correlation (DENV1 vs. DENV2: r = 0.9, P = 0.0046; r = 0.96, P = 0.0028; and r = 1, P = 0.0004, respectively, two-tailed Spearman correlation test) (Figure S3).
It is also worth noting that the [anti-E Abs] and [anti-FL Abs] determined were for IgG. To address the possibility that IgM might confound these values, we used a previously described IgM ELISA [20], [21] to measure anti-DENV IgM and found IgM was negative for all 36 serum samples at 12 months (data not shown), suggesting that IgM is unlikely to confound the 12-month [anti-FL Abs] determined and thus the correlation with NT50 analyzed in Figure 4. Another concern is that anti-prM Abs might affect the anti-E Abs determined. Previous studies have shown that the level of anti-prM Abs in dengue-immune sera (either primary or secondary DENV infection) was much lower than that of anti-E Abs based on the intensity of prM and E bands in Western blot analysis, where the antigens were derived from virus-infected cell lysates and presumably contained equal molar ratios of prM and E proteins [13], [49]–[51]. We used serial dilutions of known concentrations of anti-prM and anti-E human mAbs together with human serum on the same blot and estimated the level of anti-prM Abs in human serum to be 30 fold less than anti-E Abs (data not shown). Therefore, the amount of anti-prM Abs detected in our virion-capture ELISA is trivial compared with that of anti-E Abs, though the possibility of confounding cannot be completely ruled out. Nonetheless, the [anti-E Abs] thus measured, demonstrating higher concentrations in secondary DENV infections as compared to primary infections, is in agreement with previous reports using other methods such as the plaque reduction neutralization test and endpoint dilution determined by ELISA [9], [15], [52]. Moreover, the [anti-FL Abs] calculated based on [anti-E Abs] and % anti-FL Abs showed a correlation with NT50 against likely “non-exposed” serotypes in secondary DENV infections, which is consistent with the historical observations of heterotypic neutralization against “non-exposed” serotypes after secondary DENV infection [9]. In summary, our assay for [anti-FL Abs] provides a simple and quantitative method to study the role of anti-FL Abs in protection against or enhancement of dengue disease.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Determination of % anti-FL Abs in mixtures of mAbs containing different proportions of an anti-FL mAb by VLP-capture ELISA. (A) Increasing amounts of mouse mAb FL0231, which recognizes the FL, was mixed with mouse mAb DA6-7, which recognizes E domain III, such that the proportion of anti-FL mAb increased from 0% to 100%. Different mixtures were subjected to a capture ELISA using DENV1 WT and mutant VLPs containing mutations in the FL epitope (W101A+F108A). The bar graph displaying results of an anti-E ELISA shows that comparable amounts of WT and mutant VLPs were added based on recognition of E by pooled human dengue-immune sera. (B) A linear relationship between the proportion of FL0231 (anti-FL mAb) added and the measured proportion of FL0231 was noted (P = 0.003, two-tailed Spearman correlation test). % anti-FL Abs (measured proportion of FL0231) = [1 – endpoint titer to mutant VLPs/endpoint titer to WT VLPs]×100%. Data are means with standard deviation of duplicates from one representative experiment of two. For endpoint titers, only means are shown.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002451.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
Determination of % anti-FL Abs in sequential serum samples from dengue patients by capture ELISA using DENV1 and DENV2 mutant VLPs. (A, B) Serial dilutions of sera (#237 6 and 18 months post-infection) were subjected to a capture ELISA using DENV1 WT and mutant VLPs containing mutations in FL (W101A+F108A) (A) and DENV2 WT and mutant VLPs (W101A+F108A) (B). The data are presented as in Figure 2. (C) The % anti-FL Abs in sera of another 3 patients (#194, #256 and #274) determined by capture ELISA using DENV1 and DENV2 WT and mutant VLPs. Data are means with standard deviation of duplicates from one representative experiment of two. For endpoint titers, only means are shown.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002451.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
Relationship of [anti-E Abs], % anti-FL Abs and [anti-FL Abs] determined by virion- and VLP-capture ELISA of DENV1 versus DENV3 or DENV2 systems. (A, B, C) [anti-E Abs] (A), % anti-FL Abs (B) and [anti-FL Abs] (C) in serum samples from 14 DENV3 cases were determined by DENV3 virion- and VLP-capture ELISA and were plotted against those determined by DENV1 virion- and VLP-capture ELISA. (D, E, F) [anti-E Abs] (D), % anti-FL Abs (E) and [anti-FL Abs] (F) in serum samples from 7 DENV2 cases were determined by DENV2 virion- and VLP-capture ELISA and were plotted against those determined by DENV1 virion- and VLP-capture ELISA. DENV3 (H87 strain) and DENV2 (NGC strain) virions were used in the virion-capture ELISA. DENV3 and DENV2 prM/E plasmids producing WT and FL mutant (W101A+F108A) VLPs were used to determine the % anti-FL Abs [24]. Data are means with standard deviation of duplicates from one representative experiment of two.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002451.s003
(TIF)
Table S1.
Concentration of total anti-E Abs and anti-FL Abs and proportion of anti-FL Abs in sera of 26 dengue cases 12 months post-infection.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002451.s004
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Martina Beltramello, Federica Sallusto, and Antonio Lanzavecchi at the Institute for Research in Biomeidicine in Bellinzona, Switzerland, for providing human mAb 82.11, Dr. Gwong-Jen Chang at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention at Fort Collins for kindly providing rabbit sera for the capture ELISA, and Dr. Han-Chung Wu at the Academia Sinica in Taipei, Taiwan for providing mouse mAb DA6-7.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: CYL KLW EH WKW. Performed the experiments: CYL KLW YCW SK. Analyzed the data: CYL KLW YCW SK EH WKW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CYL KLW AB EH WKW. Wrote the paper: CYL KLW EH WKW.
References
- 1. Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, et al. (2010) Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol 12: S7–S16.
- 2.
World Health Organization. (2009) Dengue hemorrhagic fever: Diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control, 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland.
- 3. Whitehead SS, Blaney JE, Durbin AP, Murphy BR (2007) Prospects for a dengue virus vaccine. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 518–528.
- 4.
Lindenbach BD, Thiel HJ, Rice CM. (2007) Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication, In Knipe DM, Howley PM eds: Fields virology, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott William & Wilkins, pp. 1101–1152.
- 5. Heinz FX, Stiasny K (2006) Flavivirus membrane fusion. J Gen Virol 87: 2755–2766.
- 6. Kuhn RJ, Zhang W, Rossmann MG, Pletnev SV, Corver J, et al. (2002) Structure of dengue virus: implications for flavivirus organization, maturation, and fusion. Cell 108: 717–725.
- 7. Halstead SB, O'Rourke EJ (1977) Antibody-enhanced dengue virus infection in primate leukocytes. Nature 265: 739–741.
- 8. Halstead SB (1988) Pathogenesis of dengue: challenges to molecular biology. Science 239: 476–481.
- 9. Halstead SB (2003) Neutralization and antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue viruses. Adv Virus Res 60: 421–67.
- 10. Modis Y, Ogata S, Clements D, Harrison SC (2004) Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion. Nature 427: 313–319.
- 11. Crill WD, Roehrig JT (2001) Monoclonal antibodies that bind to domain III of dengue virus E glycoprotein are the most efficient blockers of virus adsorption to Vero cells. J Virol 75: 7769–7773.
- 12. Calisher CH, Karabatsos N, Dalrymple JM, Shope RE, Porterfield JS, et al. (1989) Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol 70: 37–43.
- 13. Lai CY, Tsai WY, Lin SR, Kao CL, Hu SP, et al. (2008) Antibodies to envelope glycoprotein of dengue virus during the natural course of infection are predominantly cross-reactive and recognize epitopes containing highly conserved residues at the fusion loop of domain II. J Virol 82: 6631–6643.
- 14. Crill WD, Hughes HR, Delorey MJ, Chang GJ (2009) Humoral immune responses of dengue fever patients using epitope-specific serotype-2 virus-like particle antigens. PLoS One 4: e4991.
- 15. Wahala WM, Kraus AA, Haymore LB, Accavitti-Loper MA, de Silva AM (2009) Dengue virus neutralization by human immune sera: role of envelope protein domain III-reactive antibody. Virology 392: 103–113.
- 16. Lin HE, Tsai WY, Liu IJ, Li PC, Liao MY, et al. (2012) Analysis of epitopes on dengue virus envelope protein recognized by monoclonal antibodies and polyclonal human sera by a high throughput assay. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1447.
- 17. de Alwis R, Smith SA, Olivarez NP, Messer WB, Huynh JP, et al. (2012) Identification of human neutralizing antibodies that bind to complex epitopes on dengue virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 7439–7744.
- 18. Lanciotti RS, Calisher CH, Gubler DJ, Chang GJ, Vorndam AV (1992) Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 30: 545–551.
- 19. Harris E, Videa E, Pérez L, Sandoval E, Téllez Y, et al. (2000) Clinical, epidemiologic, and virologic features of dengue in the 1998 epidemic in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg 63: 5–11.
- 20. Balmaseda A, Sandoval E, Pérez L, Gutiérrez CM, Harris E (1999) Application of molecular typing techniques in the 1998 dengue epidemic in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61: 893–897.
- 21. Fernández RJ, Vázquez S (1990) Serological diagnosis of dengue by an ELISA inhibition method (EIM). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 85: 347–351.
- 22. Narvaez F, Gutierrez G, Pérez MA, Elizondo D, Nuñez A, Balmaseda A, Harris E (2011) Evaluation of the traditional and revised WHO classifications of Dengue disease severity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1397.
- 23.
World Health Organization. (1997) Dengue hemorrhagic fever: Diagnosis, treatment and control. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzland.
- 24. Hu HP, Hsieh SC, King CC, Wang WK (2007) Characterization of retrovirus-based reporter viruses pseudotyped with the precursor membrane and envelope glycoproteins of four serotypes of dengue viruses. Virology 368: 376–387.
- 25. Beltramello M, Williams KL, Simmons CP, Macagno A, Simonelli L, et al. (2010) The human immune response to dengue virus is dominated by highly cross-reactive antibodies endowed with neutralizing and enhancing activity. Cell Host Microbe 8: 271–283.
- 26. Mattia K, Puffer BA, Williams KL, Gonzalez R, Murray M, et al. (2011) Dengue reporter virus particles for measuring neutralizing antibodies against each of the four dengue serotypes. PLoS One 6: e27252.
- 27. Ansarah-Sobrinho C, Nelson S, Jost CA, Whitehead SS, Pierson TC (2008) Temperature- dependent production of pseudoinfectious dengue reporter virus particles by complementation. Virology 381: 67–74.
- 28. Zompi S, Montoya M, Pohl MO, Balmaseda A, Harris E (2012) Dominant cross-reactive B cell response during secondary acute dengue virus infection in humans. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1568.
- 29. OhAinle M, Balmaseda A, Macalalad AR, Tellez Y, Zody MC, et al. (2011) Dynamics of dengue disease severity determined by the interplay between viral genetics and serotype-specific immunity. Sci Transl Med 3: 114ra128.
- 30. Sabin AB (1952) Research on dengue during World War II. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1: 30–50.
- 31. Halstead SB (1974) Etiologies of the experimental dengues of Siler and Simmons. Am J Trop Med Hyg 23: 974–982.
- 32.
Innis BL. (1997) Antibody responses to dengue virus infection. In Gubler DJ, Kuno G eds: Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Cambridge, MA: CAB International, pp. 221–44.
- 33. Guzman MG, Alvarez M, Rodriguez-Roche R, Bernardo L, Montes T, et al. (2007) Neutralizing antibodies after infection with dengue 1 virus. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 282–286.
- 34. Imrie A, Meeks J, Gurary A, Sukhbaatar M, Truong TT, et al. (2007) Antibody to dengue 1 detected more than 60 years after infection. Viral Immunol 20: 672–675.
- 35. Gromowski GD, Barrett AD (2007) Characterization of an antigenic site that contains a dominant, type-specific neutralization determinant on the envelope protein domain III (ED3) of dengue 2 virus. Virology 366: 349–360.
- 36. Shrestha B, Brien JD, Sukupolvi-Petty S, Austin SK, Edeling MA, et al. (2010) The development of therapeutic antibodies that neutralize homologous and heterologous genotypes of dengue virus type 1. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000823.
- 37. Sukupolvi-Petty S, Austin SK, Engle M, Brien JD, Dowd KA, et al. (2010) Structure and function analysis of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against dengue virus type 2. J Virol 84: 9227–9239.
- 38. de Alwis R, Beltramello M, Messer WB, Sukupolvi-Petty S, Wahala WM, et al. (2011) In-depth analysis of the antibody response of individuals exposed to primary dengue virus infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1188.
- 39. Teoh EP, Kukkaro P, Teo EW, Lim AP, Tan TT, et al. (2012) The structural basis for serotype-specific neutralization of dengue virus by a human antibody. Sci Transl Med 4: 139ra83.
- 40. Gibbons RV, Kalanarooj S, Jarman RG, Nisalak A, Vaughn DW, et al. (2007) Analysis of repeat hospital admissions for dengue to estimate the frequency of third or fourth dengue infections resulting in admissions and dengue hemorrhagic fever, and serotype sequences. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 910–913.
- 41. Halstead SB, Shotwell H, Casals J (1973) Studies on the pathogenesis of dengue infection in monkeys. I. Clinical laboratory responses to primary infection. J Infect Dis 128: 7–14.
- 42. Price WH (1968) Sequential immunization as a vaccination procedure against dengue viruses. Am J Epidemiol 88: 392–397.
- 43. Whitehead RH, Chaicumpa V, Olson LC, Russell PK (1970) Sequential dengue virus infections in the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Am J Trop Med Hyg 19: 94–102.
- 44. Scherer WF, Breakenridge FA, Dickerman RW (1972) Cross-protection studies and search for subclinical disease in new world monkeys infected sequentially with different immunologic types of Dengue viruses. Am J Epidemiol 95: 67–79.
- 45. Crill WD, Chang GJJ (2004) Localization and characterization of flavivirus envelope glycoprotein cross-reactive epitopes. J Virol 78: 13975–13986.
- 46. Yoshida T, Mei H, Dörner T, Hiepe F, Radbruch A, et al. (2010) Memory B and memory plasma cells. Immunol Rev 237: 117–139.
- 47. de Souza VA, Tateno AF, Oliveira RR, Domingues RB, Araújo ES, et al. (2007) Sensitivity and specificity of three ELISA-based assays for discriminating primary from secondary acute dengue virus infection. J Clin Virol 39: 230–233.
- 48. Mathew A, West K, Kalayanarooj S, Gibbons RV, Srikiatkhachorn A, et al. (2011) B-cell responses during primary and secondary dengue virus infections in humans. J Infect Dis 204: 1514–1522.
- 49. Churdboonchart V, Bhamarapravati N, Peampramprecha S, Sirinavin S (1991) Antibodies against dengue viral proteins in primary and secondary dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg 44: 481–493.
- 50. Se-Thoe SY, Ng MM, Ling AE (1999) Retrospective study of Western blot profiles in immune sera of natural dengue virus infections. J Med Virol 57: 322–330.
- 51. Valdes K, Alvarez M, Pupo M, Vazquez S, Rodriguez R, Guzman MG (2000) Human Dengue antibodies against structural and nonstructural proteins. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7: 856–857.
- 52. Vaughn DW, Green S, Kalayanarooj S, Innis BL, Nimmannitya S, et al. (1997) Dengue in the early febrile phase: viremia and antibody responses. J Infect Dis 176: 322–330.