• Loading metrics

Molecular Identification of Echinococcus multilocularis Infection in Small Mammals from Northeast, Iran

  • Molouk Beiromvand,

    Affiliations Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

  • Lame Akhlaghi,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Seyed Hossein Fattahi Massom,

    Affiliation Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ghaem Educational, Research and Treatment Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

  • Ahmad Reza Meamar,

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Jamshid Darvish,

    Affiliation Department of Rodents Research, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

  • Elham Razmjou

    Affiliation Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Molecular Identification of Echinococcus multilocularis Infection in Small Mammals from Northeast, Iran

  • Molouk Beiromvand, 
  • Lame Akhlaghi, 
  • Seyed Hossein Fattahi Massom, 
  • Ahmad Reza Meamar, 
  • Jamshid Darvish, 
  • Elham Razmjou



Alveolar echinococcosis is a zoonotic disease caused by the metacestode of Echinococcus multilocularis. Many species of small mammals, including arvicolid rodents or Ochotona spp., are natural intermediate hosts of the cestode. The main aim of this study was to identify natural intermediate hosts of E. multilocularis in Chenaran County, Razavi Khorasan Province, northeastern Iran, where the prevalence of infected wild and domestic carnivores is high.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A program of trapping was carried out in five villages in which this cestode was reported in carnivores. The livers of 85 small mammals were investigated for the presence of E. multilocularis infection using multiplex PCR of mitochondrial genes. Infections were identified in 30 specimens: 23 Microtus transcaspicus, three Ochotona rufescens, two Mus musculus, one Crocidura gmelini, and one Apodemus witherbyi.


A range of small mammals therefore act as natural intermediate hosts for the transmission of E. multilocularis in Chenaran County, and the prevalence suggested that E. multilocularis infection is endemic in this region. The existence of the life cycle of this potentially lethal cestode in the vicinity of human habitats provides a significant risk of human infection.

Author Summary

Small mammals, especially rodents, coexist with humans, particularly in rural areas where they become infected with the larval stages of Echinococcus multilocularis via ingestion of eggs in feces from infected carnivores. As prey for carnivores, small mammals have an important role in the life cycle of E. multilocularis, the agent of a serious zoonotic disease, alveolar echinococcosis, infecting people in most northern hemisphere countries. We detected E. multilocularis infection in the liver of small mammals in villages of the Chenaran region of northeastern Iran, where we previously found adult E. multilocularis and/or eggs in all wild, and some domestic, carnivores examined. Several species of small mammals, especially the Transcaspian vole (Microtus transcaspicus), were natural hosts of this cestode. Since infected voles are a good marker of soil contamination with E. multilocularis eggs, they are an indicator of the infection risk for inhabitants. There is a need to educate local populations about risk of infection to avoid transmission of this pathogenic parasite.


Echinococcosis is a near cosmopolitan parasitic disease caused by the cestode Echinococcus [1], [2], [3]. The potentially fatal zoonotic disease, alveolar echinococcosis, is caused by the metacestode of E. multilocularis, which has a sylvatic cycle, comprising wild carnivores as definitive hosts and more than 40 species of small mammals, including arvicolid rodents and the lagomorph Ochotona spp., as intermediate hosts [2], [4], [5]. Humans are accidental and aberrant intermediate hosts infected by parasite eggs ingested in contaminated food or by direct contact with infected definitive hosts [5], [6].

Echinococcus multilocularis distribution is restricted to the northern hemisphere, including Central Europe, the Near East, Russia, Central Asian republics, northern Japan, parts of North America [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], and some countries of the Middle East [12], [13]. In Iran, information about E. multilocularis infection is limited to a few studies restricted to the northwestern areas of the country [14], [15], [16], [17]. The first study in Iran, conducted in 1971 on the Moghan Plain, reported E. multilocularis infection in 10% of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) [14], [15], although its metacestode was not found in any of the 5000 rodents examined (unpublished data). In 1992, a further study of 130 wild carnivores and 1500 rodents showed 22.9% of red foxes and 16% of jackals (Canis aureus) infected with adult E. multilocularis but no metacestodes in the rodents [12], [17].

Investigation of definitive and intermediate hosts of E. multilocularis in other parts of the country has been neglected. Recently, following a few reported cases of human alveolar echinococcosis [18] (E. Razmjou, unpublished data), a morphological and molecular survey was carried out on wild and domestic carnivores from the Chenaran area in northeastern Iran [19]. Based on this study, the high prevalence of carnivores infected with E. multilocularis indicates that the life cycle of E. multilocularis is being maintained here, and Razavi Khorasan Province was shown to be an endemic area [19]. Therefore, the role of dogs, foxes, jackals, wolves, and hyenas was confirmed as a definitive host. However, no data were available on the intermediate hosts of E. multilocularis in the Chenaran area.

To determine the E. multilocularis life cycle in a specific region, study of its potential intermediate hosts is imperative, since voles have a small home-range and infected voles are a good marker for the presence of E. multilocularis eggs [20], thus indicating the risk of human infection at a local level [21]. This investigation was carried out to identify the natural intermediate hosts and determine the prevalence of infection in Chenaran County to confirm the life cycle of this pathogenic cestode in this region.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

For investigating the presence of E. multilocularis infection, small mammals were trapped under license from the Iran Environment Protection Organization. Animals were handled according to the American Society of Mammalogists (ASM) guidelines for animal research, and the experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Approval No 759-2008). The inhabitants of Chenaran County villages, on whose land the specimens were collected, gave their informed consent for the trapping.

Study area

Razavi Khorasan Province is located in northeastern Iran in the vicinity of Turkmenistan and Afghanistan (Figure 1). Chenaran (36°38′N, 59°7′E), one of 19 counties in the province, is northwest of the capital, Mashhad, and had a population of approximately126,000 in 2011 [22]. It is a region of highlands, located between Binalood Heights and the Hezar Masjed Mountains at an elevation of 1400–1600 m. Average temperature in winter is 4.1°C; colder at higher elevations. Mean summer temperature is 23.9°C. Annual precipitation averages 212.6 mm with the lowest rainfall in summer. Most villages of Chenaran County are located in valleys with natural rivers as a source of water for fruit gardens and household use. The grasslands and high soil moisture in these areas provides suitable habitat for small mammals that attract predators, and likely good conditions for taeniid egg survival [23].

Figure 1. Map of Iran.

Razavi Khorasan Province is highlighted by yellow border. The study area, Chenaran County, is indicated by red (red pin). Based on the map of Iran at [19].


Trapping was conducted in October 2010 and July 2011 in five villages that reported high rates of E. multilocularis in carnivores [19]. Thirty small mammals were collected specifically for this investigation, and 55 others were trapped by inhabitants of villages to reduce rodent damage to trees and gardens. Small Sherman live traps (25×10×10 cm) were baited with cheese, muffins spread with butter, walnuts, or fruit. Trapping sites included gardens, river banks, storage rooms, and areas near burrows. All traps were checked twice daily and trapped animals were collected, labeled with date and place of sampling, and stored at −20°C.

Small mammals were identified using standard morphological criteria [24]. They were dissected, and the thoracic and peritoneal cavity and visceral organs, particularly the liver, were examined macroscopically for cysts of E. multilocularis and other parasites. Distinguishable lesions and the liver of all specimens were excised and preserved in 80% ethanol for molecular examination.

DNA extraction

For molecular analysis, the ethanol was discarded and liver samples were hydrated with 0.9% NaCl overnight. The liver was forced through a 420 µm mesh sieve and washed with PBS buffer. The liver puree and PBS buffer were transferred to a 15 ml falcon tube, centrifuged at 800×g for 10 min, and 400 µl of the cell suspension in PBS buffer, equal to approximately 25 mg liver tissue, was transferred to 2 ml tubes. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN, Germany) tissue protocol, according to manufacturer's instructions, and the Verweij et al. [25] protocol with slight modification as described [19]. DNA was stored at −20°C until molecular analysis.

Multiplex PCR

All DNA samples were amplified using primer pairs, and conditions in multiplex PCR as described for detection of E. multilocularis, E. granulosus, and Taenia spp. infections [26]. The primer pairs were arranged to amplify partial sequences of the mitochondrial genes for NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (nad1) for detection of E. multilocularis, and the small subunit of ribosomal RNA (rrnS) for detection of E. granulosus and Taenia spp.

Multiplex PCR was conducted on a final volume of 25 µl reaction mixture according to conditions and parameters previously described [19]. Amplification products were visualized by 2% (W/V) agarose gel electrophoresis, and the 395, 117, and 267 bp expected fragments were examined for presence of E. multilocularis, E. granulosus, and Taenia spp., respectively. In all PCR reactions, distilled water was used as a negative control and standard DNA of E. multilocularis, E. granulosus, and Taenia hydatigena (provided by Professor Deplazes, Institute of Parasitology, Zurich, Switzerland) as positive controls, to validate the PCR reaction results. In order to decrease inhibition factors and increase likelihood of detecting positive samples, we diluted DNA samples with distilled water and conducted multiplex PCR on serial dilutions of DNA. The optimal volume of DNA for PCR reaction was in the range 0.25–2 µl in 25 µl of reaction mixture.

For further confirmation, samples were examined using single PCR with primers Cest1/Cest2 [26] and EM-H15/EM-H17 [20] for E. multilocularis, Cest4/Cest5 for E. granulosus, and Cest3/Cest5 for Taenia spp. [26] and sequencing of E. multilocularis positive samples. Echinococcus multilocularis amplified fragments were extracted from agarose gels using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions and were sequenced on both strands with primers Cest1/Cest2 (Bioneer, Korea). The sequence results were compared with the Genbank database using the DNASIS MAX (version 2.09; Hitachi, Yokohama, Japan) software.


Identification of small mammals

Base on morphological criteria, the 85 small mammals trapped in five villages of Chenaran County were classified into six species of the four families Cricetidae, Muridae, Soricidae, Ochotonidae. The majority of small mammals caught were Microtus transcaspicus (63.5%, 54/85) of the Cricetidae. Muridae was second, with 15 Mus musculus (17.6%), nine Apodemus witherbyi (10.6%), and one Nesokia indica (1.2%). Four were Ochotona rufescens (4.7%), and two were Crocidura gmelini (2.4%) of the non-rodent families Ochotonidae and Soricidae (Table 1).

Morphological examination

Macroscopic examination of visceral organs showed liver cysts in nine of 85 (10.6%) animals. Liver cysts were isolated from six of 54 (11.1%) M. transcaspicus and two of 15 (13.3%) M. musculus. Three cysts were observed, in liver of one C. gmelini.

Molecular analysis

Multiplex PCR showed 30 of 85 captured specimens (35.3%) to be infected with E. multilocularis and 14 (16.5%) infected with Taenia spp. by amplification of 395 bp fragment of nad1 and 267 bp fragment of rrnS, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Multiplex PCR amplification of mitochondrial genes of E. multilocularis and Taenia spp. of DNA extracted from liver of small mammals.

Lane M, 50 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas; Cat No SM0373); Lane 1, positive control, a standard DNA of E. multilocularis (395 bp); Lane 2, negative control; Lane 5, 6, 10–12 E. multilocularis; Lane 7 and 8, mixed infection of E. multilocularis (395 bp) and Taenia spp. (267 bp); Lane 3, 4, 9, and 13 negative samples.

Echinococcus multilocularis infection was identified in liver of 23 of 54 M. transcaspicus (42.6%), three O. rufescens (75.0%; 3/4), two M. musculus (13.3%; 2/15), one C. gmelini (50.0%; 1/2), and one A. witherbyi (11.1%; 1/9). Taenia spp. were found in liver of nine M. transcaspicus (16.7%; 9/54), two M. musculus (13.3%; 2/15), one C. gmelini (50.0%; 1/2), and one A. witherbyi (11.1%; 1/9). The only N. indica specimen captured was infected with Taenia spp. The single PCR amplifications confirmed the results of multiplex PCR.

Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia spp. co-infections were revealed in 11 of 33 PCR positive samples by amplification of two species-specific fragments (Table 2). A single amplicon detected 19 E. multilocularis (22.4%) and three Taenia spp. (3.5%) infected small mammals (Table 2).

Table 2. Number (%) of single and co-infections with E. multilocularis and Taenia spp. in liver samples of small mammals.

Fifty-two liver samples were negative for E. multilocularis and Taenia spp. by all methods used. Echinococcus granulosus infection was not found in any liver sample.

All positive samples were confirmed as E. multilocularis using sequencing of the nad1 gene. The alignment of amplified nad1 sequences showed 100% identity with published reference sequences for E. multilocularis. The nucleotide sequence of five E. multilocularis amplified nad1 genes from five small mammal species were deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide sequence database under accession number AB720065–69.


Although previous studies of definitive hosts have revealed that northwestern Iran is an endemic focus for E. multilocularis, its metacestode stages have not been found [12], [17]. The most recent investigation, using morphological and molecular methods, indicated high endemicity in the newly surveyed Chenaran County, with 100% prevalence of infection in wild carnivores and 6.5% in domestic and stray dogs [19]. As the presence of both definitive and intermediate hosts is required for establishment and maintenance of the life cycle, finding a high level of E. multilocularis infection (35.3%) among 85 small mammals belonging to two rodent families, Cricetidae and Muridae, and two non-rodent families, Ochotonidae and Soricidae, has confirmed the existence of the E. multilocularis life cycle in Chenaran County.

Reports of the prevalence of E. multilocularis infection have ranged from less than 1% to more than 80% in small mammals of the Soricidae, Talpidae, Sciuridae, Cricetidae, Arvicolidae, Muridae, Dipodidae, and Ochotonidae [2], [12], [27], [28]. This wide variation might be due to a wide spectrum of sensitive intermediate hosts [2] as well as to the number of investigated hosts and the diagnostic methods used [12]. The rate of infection in our study (35.3%) was lower than that found in some regions [2], [12], [27], but higher than reported in others [29], [30], [31]. The differing findings might be the result of identification based on gross and microscopic appearance of lesions found by histology [32], [33] or conducting PCR only on visually unidentifiable lesions [29], [30], [31]. In our study, cysts were detected in only 10.6% of the 85 investigated liver samples by direct examination, but this increased to 38.8% positive E. multilocularis and Taenia spp. infection with multiplex PCR on liver of all sampled specimens. It may be assumed that this finding reflected the complexity of distinguishing small immature cysts [34], especially in animals less than three months old [29], or in atypical or calcified liver lesions less than 5 mm in diameter [27], [35] by microscopic examination, while 14 pg of DNA can be detected by multiplex PCR [36]. An experimental infection of Microtus arvalis showed that PCR gives the only definitive diagnosis in lesions of less than two-weeks duration [37]. This may be the consequence of protoscoleces in the metacestode of E. multilocularis development extending over the course of 2–4 months in the liver of its natural intermediate host [12]. Stieger et al. [20] showed that E. multilocularis-specific PCR of 161 morphologically unidentifiable liver lesions of Arvicola amphibius (formerly A. terrestris) found 55 (34.2%) positive for E. multilocularis infection, increasing the detected prevalence of E. multilocularis in A. amphibius from 2.9% (26/889) to 9.1% (81/889) [20]. In a study in Geneva, Switzerland, in which 658 non-commensal rodents were investigated using morphological and molecular methods, metacestodes of E. multilocularis were detected in 2 adult A. amphibius, while PCR identified E. multilocularis infection in 29/79 A. amphibius, 3/4 M. arvalis, and 6/9 Myodes glareolus which was not found using morphological methods [21].

Microtus transcaspicus was the most frequently captured species (63.5%) and may be the dominant small mammal in the Chenaran area. It seems that this location, at an elevation of 1400–1600 m, having moist soil with trees and shrubs along river valleys is a suitable habitat for the Transcaspian vole (M. transcaspicus). Factors such as high elevation, low temperatures, high precipitation, moist soil, and an abundance of green vegetation provide suitable conditions for survival of E. multilocularis eggs [29], [30], [38] in feces of infected wild carnivores [19], in the studied habitats of small mammals. In central Europe, the main intermediate hosts are M. arvalis (common vole), A. amphibius (water vole), and Ondatra zibethicus (muskrat) [12], while in our study area, the higher density of M. transcaspicus, along with a high prevalence of infection, suggested an important role for this rodent in the E. multilocularis life cycle.

Although the previous study in this area showed high rates of E. granulosus infection in carnivores [19], no infection was identified in the small mammals examined. The first molecular identification of natural E. granulosus infection was reported in a single ground squirrel (Spermophilus dauricus), one of 500 small mammals trapped in northwest China, an endemic area for both E. granulosus and E. multilocularis [39]. While susceptible to E. multilocularis, E. granulosus infections have been seldom observed in rodents [40]. For detection of infected hosts, it may be necessary to investigate a greater number, and additional genera, of small mammals.

The presence of Taenia spp. in 14 of 85 (16.5%) specimens investigated, with 11 (12.6%) found co-infected with E. multilocularis by multiplex PCR, is a good indicator of contamination of the environment with taeniid eggs. Voles are natural intermediate hosts of several zoonotic helminthes, including E. multilocularis, T. taeniaeformis, T. crassiceps, and Toxocara canis that can infect humans who ingest eggs excreted by the final hosts [41]. Under suitable conditions, taeniid eggs might survive up to eight months and can be spread by shoes, animal paws, flies, or other vectors, infecting small mammals, humans, and other intermediate hosts in the endemic area [42].

In conclusion, the presence of infection in small mammals suggests the active transmission of E. multilocularis in the selected area. The existence of the life cycle of this potentially lethal cestode in the vicinity of human habitats provides a significant risk of human infection.

It is recommended that an extensive survey be conducted to investigate the prevalence of E. multilocularis in humans and domestic ungulates in Razavi Khorasan Province. In addition, there is a need to educate the local population about the infection, and programs for reducing the risk of transfer of infection to human and domestic animals should be initiated in Chenaran rural areas. As several human cases have been reported in other parts of Iran [43], further studies to investigate the life cycle of E. multilocularis in other parts of the country is recommended.


The authors acknowledge Iran and Razavi Khorasan Environment Protection Organization. We are grateful to the Rodentology Research Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, especially Ahmad Mahmoodi and Morteza Monfared for their help with identification of small mammals. Thanks to the inhabitants of Chenaran County villages for their help in sample collection. We are deeply indebted to Akira Ito for his helpful discussions and valuable comments during the study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ER. Performed the experiments: MB ER. Analyzed the data: MB ER JD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MB ER LA SHFM ARM. Wrote the paper: MB ER.


  1. 1. Dakkak A (2010) Echinococcosis/hydatidosis: A severe threat in Mediterranean countries. Vet Parasitol 174: 2–11.
  2. 2. Eckert J, Deplazes P (2004) Biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of echinococcosis, a zoonosis of increasing concern. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 107–135.
  3. 3. McManus DP, Zhang W, Li J, Bartley PB (2003) Echinococcosis. Lancet 362: 1295–1304.
  4. 4. Deplazes P, Hegglin D, Gloor S, Romig T (2004) Wilderness in the city: the urbanization of Echinococcus multilocularis. Trends Parasitol 20: 77–84.
  5. 5. McManus DP (2010) Echinococcosis with particular reference to Southeast Asia. Adv Parasitol 72: 267–303.
  6. 6. Miterpakova M, Dubinskay P (2011) Fox tapeworm (Echinococcus multilocularis) in Slovakia - summarizing the long-term monitoring. Helminthologia 48: 155–161.
  7. 7. Bartholomot G, Vuitton DA, Harraga S, Shi DZ, Giraudoux P, et al. (2002) Combined ultrasound and serologic screening for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis in central China. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 23–29.
  8. 8. Carmena D, Benito A, Eraso E (2007) The immunodiagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 13: 460–475.
  9. 9. Eckert J (2003) Predictive values and quality control of techniques for the diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis in definitive hosts. Acta Trop 85: 157–163.
  10. 10. Ito A, Romig T, Takahashi K (2003) Perspective on control options for Echinococcus multilocularis with particular reference to Japan. Parasitology 127: S159–S172.
  11. 11. Ziadinov I, Deplazes P, Mathis A, Mutunova B, Abdykerimov K, et al. (2010) Frequency distribution of Echinococcus multilocularis and other helminths of foxes in Kyrgyzstan. Vet Parasitol 171: 286–292.
  12. 12. Eckert J, Schantz PM, Gasser RB, Torgerson PR, Bessonov AS, et al.. (2001) Geographic distribution and prevalence. In: Eckert J, Gemmell MA, Meslin F-X, Pawlowski ZS, editors. Manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern. Paris: WHO/OIE pp. 101–143.
  13. 13. Torgerson PR, Keller K, Magnotta M, Ragland N (2010) The global burden of alveolar echinococcosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e722.
  14. 14. Mobedi I, Sadighian A (1971) Echinococcus multilocularis Leuckart, 1863, in red foxes, Vulpes vulpes Linn., in Moghan, Azerbaijan Province, northwest of Iran. J Parasitol 57: 493.
  15. 15. Mobedi I, Bray RA, Arfaa F, Movafag K (1973) A study on the cestodes of carnivores in the northwest of Iran. J Helminthol 47: 277–281.
  16. 16. Zare-Bidaki M, Mobedi I, Naddaf SR, Kia EB, Mahmoudi M, et al. (2009) Prevalence of Echinococcus spp. infection using coproantigen ELISA among canids of Moghan Plain, Iran. Iranian J Publ Health 38: 112–118.
  17. 17. Zariffard M, Massoud J (1998) Study of Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis infections in Canidae in Ardabile Province of Iran. Arch Razi Ins 48: 47–52.
  18. 18. Fattahi Masoom SH, Sharifi N (2007) Alveolar Hydatid disease: a case report. Med J Islam Repub Iran 20: 205–207.
  19. 19. Beiromvand M, Akhlaghi L, Fattahi Massom SH, Mobedi I, Meamar AR, et al. (2011) Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in Carnivores in Razavi Khorasan Province, Iran Using Mitochondrial DNA. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1379.
  20. 20. Stieger C, Hegglin D, Schwarzenbach G, Mathis A, Deplazes P (2002) Spatial and temporal aspects of urban transmission of Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasitology 124: 631–640.
  21. 21. Reperant LA, Hegglin D, Tanner I, Fischer C, Deplazes P (2009) Rodents as shared indicators for zoonotic parasites of carnivores in urban environments. Parasitology 136: 329–337.
  22. 22. Census (2011) Census of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Statistical Centre of Iran
  23. 23. Veit P, Bilger B, Schad V, Schafer J, Frank W, et al. (1995) Influence of environmental factors on the infectivity of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. Parasitology 110: 79–86.
  24. 24. Corbet GB (1978) The mammals of the palaearctic region: a taxonomic review. British Museum (Natural History),. London: British Museum (Natural History) and Cornell University Press. 314 p.
  25. 25. Verweij JJ, Pit DSS, van Lieshout L, Baeta SM, Dery GD, et al. (2001) Determining the prevalence of Oesophagostomum bifurcum and Necator americanus infections using specific PCR amplification of DNA from faecal samples. Trop Med Int Health 6: 726–731.
  26. 26. Trachsel D, Deplazes P, Mathis A (2007) Identification of taeniid eggs in the faeces from carnivores based on multiplex PCR using targets in mitochondrial DNA. Parasitology 134: 911–920.
  27. 27. Gottstein B, Saucy F, Deplazes P, Reichen J, Demierre G, et al. (2001) Is high prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis in wild and domestic animals associated with disease incidence in humans? Emerg Infect Dis 7: 408–412.
  28. 28. Gottstein B, Saucy F, Wyss C, Siegenthaler M, Jacquier P, et al. (1996) Investigations on a Swiss area highly endemic for Echinococcus multilocularis. Appl Parasitol 37: 129–136.
  29. 29. Burlet P, Deplazes P, Hegglin D (2011) Age, season and spatio-temporal factors affecting the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia taeniaeformis in Arvicola terrestris. Parasit Vectors 4: 6.
  30. 30. Hanosset R, Saegerman C, Adant S, Massart L, Losson B (2008) Echinococcus multilocularis in Belgium: Prevalence in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and in different species of potential intermediate hosts. Vet Parasitol 151: 212–217.
  31. 31. Hofer S, Gloor S, Muller U, Mathis A, Hegglin D, et al. (2000) High prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis in urban red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and voles (Arvicola terrestris) in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. Parasitology 120: 135–142.
  32. 32. Barabasi SS, Marosf i L, Barabasi ZS, Cozma V (2011) Natural alveolar echinococcosis with Echinococcus multilocularis in wild rodents. Sci Parasitol 12: 11–21.
  33. 33. Petavy AF, Tenora F, Deblock S (2003) Co-occurrence of metacestodes of Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia taeniaeformis (Cestoda) in Arvicola terrestris (Rodentia) in France. Folia Parasitol 50: 157–158.
  34. 34. Al-Sabi MS, Kapel CO (2011) Multiplex PCR identification of Taenia spp. in rodents and carnivores. Parasitol Res 109: 1293–1298.
  35. 35. Torgerson PR, Deplazes P (2009) Echinococcosis: diagnosis and diagnostic interpretation in population studies. Trends Parasitol 25: 164–170.
  36. 36. Davidson RK, Oines O, Madslien K, Mathis A (2009) Echinococcus multilocularis-adaptation of a worm egg isolation procedure coupled with a multiplex PCR assay to carry out large-scale screening of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Norway. Parasitol Res 104: 509–514.
  37. 37. Deplazes P, Dinkel A, Mathis A (2003) Molecular tools for studies on the transmission biology of Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasitology 127 Suppl: S53–61.
  38. 38. Giraudoux P, Pleydell D, Raoul F, Quéré J-P, Wang Q, et al. (2006) Transmission ecology of Echinococcus multilocularis: What are the ranges of parasite stability among various host communities in China? Parasitol Int 55: S237–S246.
  39. 39. Yang YR, Liu T, Bai X, Boufana B, Craig PS, et al. (2009) Natural Infection of the Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus spp.) with Echinococcus granulosus in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e518.
  40. 40. Nelson GS, Rausch RL (1963) Echinococcus Infections in Man and Animals in Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 57: 136–139.
  41. 41. Fuhrer H-P, Schneider R, Walochnik J, Auer H (2010) Extraintestinal helminths of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) and the water vole (Arvicola terrestris) in Western Austria (Vorarlberg). Parasitol Res 106: 1001–1004.
  42. 42. Deplazes P, van Knapen F, Schweiger A, Overgaauw PAM (2011) Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Vet Parasitol 182: 41–53.
  43. 43. Geramizadeh B, Nikeghbalian S, Malekhosseini SA (2012) Alveolar echinococcosis of the liver: report of three cases from different geographic areas of Iran. Hepat Mon 12: e6143.