Immunosuppression, which has become an increasingly relevant clinical condition in the last 50 years, modifies the natural history of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in most patients with Chagas disease. The main goal in this setting is to prevent the consequences of reactivation of T. cruzi infection by close monitoring. We analyze the relationship between Chagas disease and three immunosuppressant conditions, including a description of clinical cases seen at our center, a brief review of the literature, and recommendations for the management of these patients based on our experience and on the data in the literature. T. cruzi infection is considered an opportunistic parasitic infection indicative of AIDS, and clinical manifestations of reactivation are more severe than in acute Chagas disease. Parasitemia is the most important defining feature of reactivation. Treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox is strongly recommended in such cases. It seems reasonable to administer trypanocidal treatment only to asymptomatic immunosuppressed patients with detectable parasitemia, and/or patients with clinically defined reactivation. Specific treatment for Chagas disease does not appear to be related to a higher incidence of neoplasms, and a direct role of T. cruzi in the etiology of neoplastic disease has not been confirmed. Systemic immunosuppressive diseases or immunosuppressants can modify the natural course of T. cruzi infection. Immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids have not been associated with higher rates of reactivation of Chagas disease. Despite a lack of evidence-based data, treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox should be initiated before immunosuppression where possible to reduce the risk of reactivation. Timely antiparasitic treatment with benznidazole and nifurtimox (or with posaconazole in cases of therapeutic failure) has proven to be highly effective in preventing Chagas disease reactivation, even if such treatment has not been formally incorporated into management protocols for immunosuppressed patients. International consensus guidelines based on expert opinion would greatly contribute to standardizing the management of immunosuppressed patients with Chagas disease.
Citation: Pinazo M-J, Espinosa G, Cortes-Lletget C, Posada EdJ, Aldasoro E, Oliveira I, et al. (2013) Immunosuppression and Chagas Disease: A Management Challenge. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7(1): e1965. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001965
Editor: Mauricio Martins Rodrigues, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
Published: January 17, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Pinazo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work has been supported by the EC within the 7th Framework Program under grant agreement no. FP7-GA-261495. We would like to thank the Generalitat de Catalunya (Program 2009SGR38) for supporting our research on Chagas Disease. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Immunosuppression has gained increasing clinical relevance in the last 50 years. The list of neoplastic and systemic diseases that cause immunosuppression is increasing, as is the use of new immunosuppressive drugs. Furthermore, the exponential increase in the incidence of AIDS cases in the last 30 years has contributed to a significant increase in the number of immunosuppressed patients .
In most cases, immunosuppression modifies the natural history of other diseases, predisposing patients to the development or reactivation of opportunistic infections, with special, and often severe, clinical features . The management of emerging infectious diseases, often unfamiliar to the clinician, becomes relevant in this context.
One of the most prevalent parasitic infections that has spread from Latin America to non-endemic areas such as the United States, Canada, and Europe is Chagas disease, or American trypanosomiasis , . Its etiological agent, Trypanosoma cruzi, has not traditionally been considered an opportunistic agent, but in recent decades there have been many reports of reactivation in immunocompromised patients (mainly those with AIDS) –.
With increasing migratory flows from poor, rural areas to large cities and developed, non-endemic countries, a growing number of patients with chronic Chagas disease are being diagnosed with other conditions that cause immunosuppression or require treatment with immunosuppressants; under these conditions, reactivation of the parasite is a likely outcome .
Reactivation is defined as an increase in parasitemia that can be detected by direct parasitological and/or PCR techniques, even in the absence of clinical symptoms . The appearance of symptoms represents a worsening of the underlying disease. The most common symptoms of Chagas disease reactivation are subcutaneous nodules (chagoma), panniculitis, myocarditis with signs of heart failure, fever, meningitis, encephalitis, and stroke –, but other symptoms, such as fatigue, anorexia, and diarrhea, are also seen . In cases of reactivation, timely antiparasitic treatment with benznidazole has proven to be highly effective –. Several guidelines for the treatment of immunosuppressed patients with Chagas disease have been published recently –, but there is no international consensus on the management of reactivation in these patients. While treatment with benznidazole is highly effective in reactivations , , it has not been formally incorporated into the management protocols of HIV/AIDS .
In this article we describe our experience with three immunosuppressive conditions (HIV infection, neoplastic disease, and systemic autoimmune disease) in patients with T. cruzi infection and provide some practical recommendations for the management of these patients based on our experience and a review of the literature. The aim is to contribute to the pool of knowledge in this area and to help improve the quality of care of patients with T. cruzi infection and any of the immunosuppressive conditions analyzed.
We analyzed three immunosuppressive conditions in patients with T. cruzi infection: HIV/AIDS, neoplastic disease, and systemic autoimmune disease. For each category, we have included a review of the relevant literature, a description of all the clinical cases seen at our clinical care center between June 2007 and December 2010, and some recommendations for management based on our experience and the data in the literature.
The cases were diagnosed and treated at a specialist facility for the management of Chagas disease at the International Health Centre of Hospital Clínic in Barcelona, Spain. Screening for all patients includes T. cruzi and HIV tests, and general analyses.
Of 1,310 patients screened in the study period, T. cruzi infection was diagnosed in 715 patients. Of these, three had concomitant HIV infection, five had a neoplastic disease, and three had a systemic autoimmune disorder.
According to our in-hospital protocol for Chagas disease, all the patients signed informed consent before blood collection for diagnosis and before initiation of treatment with benznidazole. The therapeutic regimen in all cases was 5 mg/kg/day of benznidazole for 60 days.
The literature search was performed in the MEDLINE database using the terms Chagas disease and T. cruzi, with the subheadings immunosuppression, HIV, systemic diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, reactivation, neoplasia, corticoids, chemotherapy, benznidazole, nifurtimox, PCR, and management.
Results and Discussion
Coinfection with T. cruzi and HIV
Review of the literature.
T. cruzi infection has been classified as an AIDS-defining opportunistic parasitosis by the US Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention since 2004 . Considering the increasing number of cases of Chagas disease reactivation and the severity of the pathological manifestations associated with reactivation in patients with a low CD4+ T-cell count (usually <200 cells/mL) , –, it is particularly important to consider T. cruzi infection as a potential opportunistic parasitic infection in patients in or from Chagas disease–endemic countries.
Even in asymptomatic patients, T. cruzi parasitemia is higher in those with concomitant HIV infection than in those without –, and specific treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox is recommended in such cases. The persistent immune activation induced by T. cruzi has been related to a sustained increase in HIV replication, with several studies showing an increase in plasma HIV-1 viral load in patients with parasitemia, indicating reactivation of T. cruzi infection , .
Reactivation in immunosuppressed patients is usually associated with more severe clinical manifestations (e.g., central nervous system [CNS] involvement, chagomas, meningoencephalitis, and severe myocarditis) than those observed in immunocompetent patients with acute Chagas disease , . CNS infection by T. cruzi is more common than myocardial damage in HIV-immunosuppressed patients , , , . Space-occupying lesions in the white matter of the brain are the most common clinical finding, but meningitis and meningoencephalitis may also occur . CNS involvement was reported in 75%–80% of patients with concomitant T. cruzi and HIV infection between 1990 (when del Castillo et al.  described the first case of a young man with HIV infection and a lesion in the right frontal lobe with inflammatory perivascular infiltrates and clusters of T. cruzi amastigotes) and 2007 , , –.
Cardiac compromise is the second most prevalent manifestation of reactivated Chagas disease, occurring in 25%–44% of patients coinfected with T. cruzi and HIV , , –. The most common cardiac manifestation is myocarditis, sometimes as a major presentation, but usually with CNS involvement masking heart involvement , . Isolated reports of reactivation in other organs, such as the gastrointestinal tract, pericardium , peritoneum , skin , and cervix uteri , have been published.
The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the three patients with T. cruzi and HIV infection are shown in Tables 1 and 2, together with details of treatment and follow-up. Reactivation was not observed in any of the patients, but it should be noted that their CD4+ T-cell count remained above 200 cells/mL throughout follow-up.
Recommendations for management.
HIV-positive patients with moderate immunosuppression and latent Chagas disease are usually asymptomatic, and parasitemia normally increases before the appearance of symptoms . Nevertheless, treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox should be initiated as soon as any symptoms of T. cruzi infection reactivation are noted, even in the absence of an increase in parasitemia , , , . Direct microscopic examination of blood and cerebrospinal fluid may reveal the presence of T. cruzi trypomastigotes, which usually, but not always, precedes clinical manifestations . Parasitological and/or PCR follow-up are thus mandatory in patients with HIV infection .
In some patients with myocardial involvement, the clinical manifestations are heart failure and arrhythmias, but findings from autopsy studies suggest that a significant proportion of patients with Chagas disease and HIV/AIDS have clinically silent cardiac disease, even though they have inflammatory foci associated with T. cruzi–infected cardiomyocytes , .
Brain imaging techniques are theoretically useful for exploring CNS involvement, but considering the lack of specificity of brain imaging and the large variability in the space occupied by T. cruzi–induced lesions in individuals with AIDS, a brain biopsy provides better guarantees of accurate diagnosis and appropriate therapy. Histopathologic examination of the space-occupying lesions of the brain shows severe inflammation in association with heavily parasitized glial cells and occasionally neurons .
Specific treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox is recommended when there is strong evidence of T. cruzi infection reactivation. The recommendation grade is AII (treatment should always be offered) in patients with reactivated T. cruzi infection and HIV/AIDS or another immunosuppressive disorder, and BII (treatment should generally be offered) in those with impending immunosuppression . Despite a lack of evidence-based data, T. cruzi–specific treatment should be considered at the moment of HIV diagnosis, prior to severe immunosuppression, in order to prevent or minimize the risk of Chagas disease reactivation.
The duration of Chagas therapy has not been standardized in HIV/AIDS, but some groups recommend maintaining treatment throughout immunosuppression , as is done in many patients with Chagas disease who undergo organ transplantation. Specific chemotherapy in Chagas disease is still unsatisfactory, and while benznidazole and nifurtimox can be effective in reducing parasitemia, controlling clinical manifestations, and reducing mortality (and thereby improving prognosis) during reactivations in immunocompromised individuals, they have frequent adverse side effects and limited capacity for achieving a parasitological cure; such facts should be taken in account to decide the length of treatment , .
T. cruzi infection is an opportunistic parasitic infection indicative of AIDS. Clinical manifestations are more severe in reactivation than in acute Chagas disease, and usually involve the CNS. Parasitemia should be considered the most important defining feature of reactivation, because it usually increases before the onset of symptoms. Treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox is strongly recommended in cases of clinical and/or parasitological suspicion of reactivation.
Pharmacological Immunosuppression: Neoplastic Disease in Individuals with T. cruzi Infection
Review of the literature.
Little is known about the relationship between the incidence of neoplastic disease and T. cruzi infection, or about whether the immune response induced by this infection modifies the development or location of neoplasms.
The relationship between immunosuppression and neoplastic disease in patients with T. cruzi infection has been analyzed from three perspectives: 1) neoplastic disease as a potential immunosuppressive condition that increases the likelihood of reactivation of infection; 2) neoplastic disease occurring as a result of treatment with benznidazole, either alone or combined with immunosuppressive drugs; and 3) neoplastic disease as a condition that is potentially more common in patients with Chagas disease.
In our opinion, the most relevant issue regarding the association between neoplastic disease and Chagas disease is the potential for T. cruzi reactivation and the management of this reactivation in order to prevent serious consequences.
Based on clinical observations, some authors have speculated as to whether benznidazole treatment in immunosuppressed patients might actually cause neoplasms , . However, several clinical studies with long follow-up have found no evidence of a higher incidence of histological signs of malignancy in such patients , , . The conclusions of these studies are clear: benznidazole is not related to the development of neoplasms and the association between benznidazole and other immunosuppressive drugs does not contribute to an increased incidence of neoplastic disease.
A higher prevalence of esophageal carcinoma and uterine cervix leiomyoma has been reported in patients with chronic Chagas disease than in individuals without T. cruzi infection . Esophageal carcinoma is more common in patients with Chagas disease and megaesophagus than in those without Chagas disease , but a similar prevalence has been reported in patients without megaesophagus, regardless of whether or not they have Chagas disease . The association between esophageal carcinoma and Chagas disease in patients with megaesophagus is probably a consequence of the chronic esophagitis caused by alimentary stasis. Although some clinical studies have claimed an association between megacolon due to Chagas disease and colon cancer , , an experimental study in mice with chagasic megacolon, where fecal stasis was observed, failed to reveal a higher incidence of colon cancer 
In our series, four patients with T. cruzi infection had bone marrow cancer and one had breast adenocarcinoma. The characteristics of the patients and the diseases are summarized in Table 3. Two of the patients died, one due to myeloid acute leukemia and the other due to lymph node metastasis from primary breast adenocarcinoma. None of the patients had clinical evidence of reactivation during follow-up.
Recommendations for management.
Reactivation of T. cruzi infection must be considered in patients with chronic Chagas disease and neoplastic disease requiring intensive or long-term pharmacological immunosuppression. It is not possible, however, to make a general evidence-based recommendation for the management of such patients or for the prevention of reactivation. The risks of toxicity associated with trypanocidal treatment are well known and efficacy in patients with chronic disease is variable and limited, which renders risk/benefit analyses difficult. Based on reports in the literature and on our experience, it would seem reasonable to administer trypanocidal treatment only to asymptomatic immunosuppressed patients with detectable parasitemia (Strout method or PCR) at the moment of evaluation, or to patients with clinically defined reactivation. Trypanocidal treatment at the moment of diagnosis and prior to immunosuppression might minimize the risk of reactivation, but this indication is controversial and is not supported by evidence-based data. Experience in this area is limited to isolated case reports and series.
Specific treatment for Chagas disease does not appear to be related to a higher incidence of neoplasms, and a direct role of T. cruzi in the etiology of neoplastic disease has not been confirmed. Reactivation, however, might be an unavoidable consequence of immunosuppressive treatment. Patients with T. cruzi infection who need immunosuppressive therapy must thus be closely followed, and treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox is strongly recommended in cases of confirmed reactivation.
Systemic Autoimmune Disease and Chagas Disease
Review of the literature.
Systemic autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are considered rare in patients with T. cruzi infection, but this may be due to the underdiagnosis of autoimmune diseases in low-income areas/countries. The coexistence of Chagas disease and these two conditions has been rarely reported in the scientific literature, with only 12 cases of SLE – and one of RA described to date .
Barousse et al.  reported on a series of ten patients with SLE and T. cruzi infection treated with nifurtimox. Five of the patients were receiving concomitant immunosuppressive therapy and three of these died. Reactivation was not identified in these patients (autopsy did not show T. cruzi amastigotes, so Chagas disease was not identified as cause of death for any of them) or in the remaining seven patients monitored during follow-up. Dos Santos-Neto et al.  described a patient with mesangial proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis and Chagas disease treated with prednisone (1 mg/kg) and monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide (1 g/m2 of body surface). They reported reactivation in the form of CNS involvement and high parasitemia determined by xenodiagnosis, and treated successfully with benznidazole. After 8 years of follow up, the patient died of generalized lupus vasculitis. The twelfth case of SLE in association with Chagas disease was described by our group in 2010 . In the only case of concomitant Chagas disease and RA in the literature , the patient developed polymyositis 28 years after the diagnosis of RA. Benznidazole was not prescribed. The detection of parasites in the muscle lesions suggested Chagas disease etiology, and the worsening clinical condition and disease progression could have been related to the use of corticosteroids.
Two studies have provided valuable information about the use of corticosteroids at immunosuppressive doses in patients with T. cruzi , . Rassi et al.  described the effectiveness of benznidazole in reducing reactivation rates in patients with T. cruzi infection treated with corticosteroids, but they also described higher rates of parasitemia that appeared to be related to higher doses of corticosteroids. Nevertheless, in all the cases, there were other causes of immunosuppression besides the long-term use of corticosteroids. There has just been one case reported of reactivation of Chagas disease in which corticosteroids were the only immunosuppressive factor: that of a child receiving dexamethasone for a cranial traumatism . Currently, there is no firm evidence of an association between immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids alone and higher rates of T. cruzi reactivation .
Our experience with Chagas disease in association with autoimmune diseases consists of three patients with SLE and one with RA (Tables 4 and 5). All the patients received benznidazole from the moment of diagnosis, and no episodes of reactivation were observed during follow-up. In one patient with SLE and chronic Chagas disease (the one coming from Misiones, Argentina) who was diagnosed with lupus nephritis requiring immunosuppressive treatment, response to benznidazole was not achieved, but subsequent treatment with posaconazole led to a successful resolution of the infection. In fact, despite maintenance of immunosuppressive therapy due to renal involvement, parasitemia became negative and no episodes of reactivation were observed in a follow-up period of 36 months.
Recommendations for management.
The most relevant consequences of continuous immunosuppressive treatment in patients with systemic autoimmune disease and Chagas disease is the risk of reactivation of T. cruzi infection and the development of severe, chronic forms of the disease. Unfortunately, guidelines for the management of T. cruzi infection in this setting do not exist. In immunosuppressed patients, trypanocidal treatment with benznidazole or nifurtimox is indicated (BII recommendation) . This treatment should be initiated before immunosuppression where possible to decrease the risk of reactivation. The use of benznidazole in patients who require long-term corticosteroid therapy is controversial due to the lack of supporting evidence.
Clinicians should bear in mind that the natural course of T. cruzi infection can be modified by other diseases or their treatment. Immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids have not been associated with higher rates of reactivation of Chagas disease. Furthermore, there have been no reports of a relationship between Chagas disease reactivation and other immunosuppressive drugs used in the treatment of systemic autoimmune diseases, and it has not been shown that these diseases have a direct role in the progression of T. cruzi infection.
The number of patients under immunosuppressive therapy is increasing and timely management is important to reduce the risk of comorbidities. The main goal in T. cruzi–infected patients with an immunosuppressive condition is to prevent serious consequences of reactivation of T. cruzi infection by close monitoring, and in the event of reactivation, to start early treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox to minimize clinical complications. Currently there is no international consensus on how to manage the clinical situations described in this article, and it is difficult to develop evidence-based recommendations due to the small number of Chagas disease patients diagnosed with an immunosuppressive condition besides HIV. As in other clinical situations, consensus guidelines based on expert opinion could greatly contribute to standardizing the management of patients with T. cruzi infection and a concomitant immunosuppressive condition.
- Early diagnosis of T. cruzi infection in immunosuppressed individuals is extremely important, and should be assessed prior to immunosuppressive treatment.
- In T. cruzi–infected patients with an immunosuppressive condition, the main goal is to prevent reactivation by close monitoring.
- Parasitemia measured by PCR techniques is recommended in immunosuppressed patients during follow-up.
- In cases of reactivation, early treatment with benznidazole and/or nifurtimox is strongly recommended, and posaconazole should be indicated when this fails.
Key Papers in the Field
- de Freitas VL, da Silva SC, Sartori AM, Bezerra RC, Westphalen EV, et al. (2011) Real-time PCR in HIV/Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection with and without Chagas disease reactivation: association with HIV viral load and CD4 level. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(8): e1277. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001277
- Cordova E, Boschi A, Ambrosioni J, Cudos C, Corti M (2008) Reactivation of Chagas disease with central nervous system involvement in HIV-infected patients in Argentina, 1992–2007. Int J Infect Dis 12: 587–592.
- Galhardo MC, Martins IA, Hasslocher-Moreno A, Xavier SS, Coelho JM, et al. (1999) Reactivation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32: 291–294.
- Nishioka S de A (2000). Benznidazole in the primary chemoprophylaxis of the reactivation of Chagas' disease in chronic chagasic patients using corticosteroids at immunosuppressive doses: is there sufficient evidence for recommending its use? Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33: 83–85.
- Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, Rassi A Jr., Marin-Neto JA, et al. (2007) Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 298: 2171–2181.
The research team would like to thank those who teach us every day and motivate our investigation: our patients.
- 1. UNAIDS WHO (2009) AIDS epidemic update. UNAIDS/09.36E/JC1700E.
- 2. da Costa SC (2000) Immunocompromised host: from the early events until the impact of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 95 Suppl 1: 141–144. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762000000700023
- 3. Gascon J, Bern C, Pinazo MJ (2010) Chagas disease in Spain, the United States and other non-endemic countries. Acta Trop 115: 22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.019
- 4. World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) Control and prevention of Chagas disease in Europe. Report of a WHO Informal Consultation (jointly organized by WHO headquarters and the WHO Regional Office for Europe). WHO/HTM/NTD/IDM/2010.1.2010. WHO: Geneva.
- 5. Ferreira MS, Borges AS (2002) Some aspects of protozoan infections in immunocompromised patients - a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97: 443–457. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762002000400001
- 6. Almeida EA, Lima JN, Lages-Silva E, Guariento ME, Aoki FH, et al. (2010) Chagas' disease and HIV co-infection in patients without effective antiretroviral therapy: prevalence, clinical presentation and natural history. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 104: 447–452. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.02.004
- 7. Sartori AM, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Amato Neto V, Lopes MH (1998) Follow-up of 18 patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and chronic Chagas' disease, with reactivation of Chagas' disease causing cardiac disease in three patients. Clin Infect Dis 26: 177–179. doi: 10.1086/516257
- 8. Sartori AM, Lopes MH, Caramelli B, Duarte MI, Pinto PL, et al. (1995) Simultaneous occurrence of acute myocarditis and reactivated Chagas' disease in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 21: 1297–1299. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1297
- 9. Campos SV, Strabelli TM, Amato Neto V, Silva CP, Bacal F, et al. (2008) Risk factors for Chagas' disease reactivation after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 27: 597–602. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.02.017
- 10. Bocchi EA, Bellotti G, Uip D, Kalil J, de Lourdes Higuchi M, et al. (1993) Long-term follow-up after heart transplantation in Chagas' disease. Transplant Proc 25: 1329–1330.
- 11. Stolf NA, Higushi L, Bocchi E, Bellotti G, Auler JO, et al. (1987) Heart transplantation in patients with Chagas' disease cardiomyopathy. J Heart Transplant 6: 307–312.
- 12. d'Avila SC, d'Avila AM, Pagliari C, Goncalves VM, Duarte MI (2005) Erythema nodoso in reactivation of Chagas' disease after cardiac transplantation. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38: 61–63. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822005000100013
- 13. Vaidian AK, Weiss LM, Tanowitz HB (2004) Chagas' disease and AIDS. Kinetoplastid Biol Dis 13 3: 2. doi: 10.1186/1475-9292-3-2
- 14. Altclas JD, Barcan L, Nagel C, Lattes R, Riarte A (2008) Organ transplantation and Chagas disease. JAMA 299: 1134–1135. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.10.1134-a
- 15. Cordova E, Boschi A, Ambrosioni J, Cudos C, Corti M (2008) Reactivation of Chagas disease with central nervous system involvement in HIV-infected patients in Argentina, 1992–2007. Int J Infect Dis 12: 587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.12.007
- 16. Sartori AM, Ibrahim KY, Nunes Westphalen EV, Braz LM, Oliveira OC Jr, et al. (2007) Manifestations of Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) in patients with HIV/AIDS. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 101: 31–50. doi: 10.1179/136485907x154629
- 17. Le Loup G, Pialoux G, Lescure FX (2011) Update in treatment of Chagas disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis 24: 428–434. doi: 10.1097/qco.0b013e32834a667f
- 18. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (2005) Consenso brasileiro em doença de Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38: 1–29.
- 19. Pinazo MJ, Miranda B, Rodriguez-Villar C, Altclas J, Brunet-Serra M, et al. (2011) Recommendations for management of Chagas disease in organ and hematopoietic tissue transplantation programs in nonendemic areas. Transplant Rev 25: 91–101. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2010.12.002
- 20. Perez-Molina JA, Rodriguez-Guardado A, Soriano A, Pinazo MJ, Carrilero B, et al. (2011) Guidelines on the treatment of chronic coinfection by Trypanosoma cruzi and HIV outside endemic areas. HIV Clin Trials 12: 287–298. doi: 10.1310/hct1206-287
- 21. Rocha A, de Meneses AC, da Silva AM, Ferreira MS, Nishioka SA, et al. (1994) Pathology of patients with Chagas' disease and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Trop Med Hyg 50: 261–268.
- 22. Corti M (2000) AIDS and Chagas' disease. AIDS Patient Care STDS 14: 581–588. doi: 10.1089/10872910050193752
- 23. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS/OMS) (2009) Definición de la OMS de caso de infección por el VIH a efectos de vigilancia y revisión de la estadifi cación clínica y de la clasificación inmunológica de la enfermedad relacionada con el VIH en adultos y niños. OPS/FCH/HI/04–09.E.
- 24. Del Castillo M, Mendoza G, Oviedo J, Perez Bianco RP, Anselmo AE, et al. (1990) AIDS and Chagas' disease with central nervous system tumor-like lesion. Am J Med 88: 693–694. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90544-n
- 25. del Castillo M, Silva M (1994) Chagas disease: another cause of cerebral mass in AIDS. Am J Med 96: 301–302. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90162-7
- 26. Ferreira MS, Nishioka S de A, Silvestre MT, Borges AS, Nunes-Araujo FR, et al. (1997) Reactivation of Chagas' disease in patients with AIDS: report of three new cases and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 25: 1397–1400. doi: 10.1086/516130
- 27. Gluckstein D, Ciferri F, Ruskin J (1992) Chagas' disease: another cause of cerebral mass in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Med 92: 429–432. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90275-g
- 28. Perez-Ramirez L, Barnabe C, Sartori AM, Ferreira MS, Tolezano JE, et al. (1999) Clinical analysis and parasite genetic diversity in human immunodeficiency virus/Chagas' disease coinfections in Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61: 198–206.
- 29. Sartori AM, Neto JE, Nunes EV, Braz LM, Caiaffa-Filho HH, et al. (2002) Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia in chronic Chagas disease: comparison between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative patients. J Infect Dis 186: 872–875. doi: 10.1086/342510
- 30. de Freitas VL dSS, Sartori AM, Bezerra RC, Westphalen EV, Molina TD, Teixeira AR, Ibrahim KY, Shikanai-Yasuda MA (2011) Real-time PCR in HIV/Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection with and without Chagas disease reactivation: association with HIV viral load and CD4 level. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(8): e1277 doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001277.
- 31. Sica RE, Gargiullo G, Papayanis C (2008) Tumour-like chagasic encephalitis in AIDS patients: an atypical presentation in one of them and outcome in a small series of cases. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 66: 881–884. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000600021
- 32. Montero A, Cohen JE, Martinez DP, Giovannoni AG (1998) Empirical anti-toxoplasma therapy in cerebral AIDS and Chagas disease. Presentation of 2 cases, review of the literature and proposal of an algorithm. Medicina 58: 504–506.
- 33. Pacheco RS, Ferreira MS, Machado MI, Brito CM, Pires MQ, et al. (1998) Chagas' disease and HIV co-infection: genotypic characterization of the Trypanosoma cruzi strain. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 93: 165–169. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000200005
- 34. Silva AA, Roffe E, Marino AP, dos Santos PV, Quirico-Santos T, et al. (1999) Chagas' disease encephalitis: intense CD8+ lymphocytic infiltrate is restricted to the acute phase, but is not related to the presence of Trypanosoma cruzi antigens. Clin Immunol 92: 56–66. doi: 10.1006/clim.1999.4716
- 35. Yoo TW, Mlikotic A, Cornford ME, Beck CK (2004) Concurrent cerebral american trypanosomiasis and toxoplasmosis in a patient with AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 39: e30–34. doi: 10.1086/422456
- 36. Madalosso G, Pellini AC, Vasconcelos MJ, Ribeiro AF, Weissmann L, et al. (2004) Chagasic meningoencephalitis: case report of a recently included AIDS-defining illness in Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 46: 199–202. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652004000400005
- 37. Galhardo MC, Martins IA, Hasslocher-Moreno A, Xavier SS, Coelho JM, et al. (1999) Reactivation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32: 291–294. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821999000300011
- 38. Lages-Silva E, Ramirez LE, Silva-Vergara ML, Chiari E (2002) Chagasic meningoencephalitis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: diagnosis, follow-up, and genetic characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi. Clin Infect Dis 34: 118–123. doi: 10.1086/324355
- 39. Pagano MA, Segura MJ, Di Lorenzo GA, Garau ML, Molina HA, et al. (1999) Cerebral tumor-like American trypanosomiasis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Neurol 45: 403–406. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<403::aid-ana20>3.0.co;2-k
- 40. Diazgranados CA, Saavedra-Trujillo CH, Mantilla M, Valderrama SL, Alquichire C, et al. (2009) Chagasic encephalitis in HIV patients: common presentation of an evolving epidemiological and clinical association. Lancet Infect Dis 9: 324–330. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70088-x
- 41. Kirchhoff LV, Weiss LM, Wittner M, Tanowitz HB (2004) Parasitic diseases of the heart. Front Biosci 9: 706–723. doi: 10.2741/1255
- 42. Rivera J, Hillis LD, Levine BD (2004) Reactivation of cardiac Chagas' disease in acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am J Cardiol 94: 1102–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.081
- 43. Sartori AM, Lopes MH, Benvenuti LA, Caramelli B, di Pietro A, et al. (1998) Reactivation of Chagas' disease in a human immunodeficiency virus-infected patient leading to severe heart disease with a late positive direct microscopic examination of the blood. T Am J Trop Med Hyg 59: 784–786.
- 44. Cahn P BR, Freilij H (2001) Other parasitic infections. In: Crowe S HJ, Mills J, editor. Management of the HIV-infected patient. 2nd ed. London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 513–525.
- 45. Iliovich E, Lopez R, Kum M, Uzandizaga G (1998) Spontaneous chagasic peritonitis in a patient with AIDS. Medicina 58: 507–508.
- 46. Sartori AM, Sotto MN, Braz LM, Oliveira Junior O da C, Patzina RA, et al. (1999) Reactivation of Chagas disease manifested by skin lesions in a patient with AIDS. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 93: 631–632. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90077-9
- 47. Concetti H, Retegui M, Perez G, Perez H (2000) Chagas' disease of the cervix uteri in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Hum Pathol 31: 120–122.
- 48. Solari A, Saavedra H, Sepulveda C, Oddo D, Acuna G, et al. (1993) Successful treatment of Trypanosoma cruzi encephalitis in a patient with hemophilia and AIDS. Clin Infect Dis 16: 255–259. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.2.255
- 49. Braz LM, Amato Neto V, Carignani FL, De Marchi CR (2001) Trypanosoma cruzi parasitemia observed in immunocompromised patients: the importance of the artificial xenodiagnosis. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 43: 113–115. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652001000200012
- 50. Schijman AG, Bisio M, Orellana L, Sued M, Duffy T, et al. (2011) International study to evaluate PCR methods for detection of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood samples from Chagas disease patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e931 doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000931.
- 51. Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, Rassi A Jr, Marin-Neto JA, et al. (2007) Evaluation and treatment of chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 298: 2171–2181. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2171
- 52. Rodriques Coura J, de Castro SL (2002) A critical review on Chagas disease chemotherapy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 97: 3–24. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762002000100001
- 53. Andrade SG, Mesquita IM, Jambeiro JF, Santos IF, Portella RS (2003) Treatment with benznidazole in association with immunosuppressive drugs in mice chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi: investigation into the possible development of neoplasias. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 441–447. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822003000400002
- 54. Cançado JRCM (1985) Tratamento especifico Cardiopatia Chagásica. 1st ed: Fundação Carlos Chagas de Pesquisa Médica 327–355.
- 55. Murta EF, Oliveira GP, Prado Fde O, De Souza MA, Tavares Murta BM, et al. (2002) Association of uterine leiomyoma and Chagas' disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 66: 321–324.
- 56. Rocha A, Almeida HO Esper FE, Moraes DM, Santos EP, et al. (1983) Associacao entre megaesofago e carcinoma de esofago. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 16: 94–97. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821983000200006
- 57. Oliveira EC, Lette MS, Ostermayer AL, Almeida AC, Moreira H (1997) Chagasic megacolon associated with colon cancer. Am J Trop Med Hyg 56: 596–598.
- 58. Adad SJ, Etchebehere RM, Araujo JR, Madureira AB, Lima VG, et al. (2002) Association of chagasic megacolon and cancer of the colon: case report and review of the literature. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 35: 63–68. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822002000100012
- 59. Garcia SB, Oliveira JS, Pinto LZ, Muccillo G, Zucoloto S (1996) The relationship between megacolon and carcinoma of the colon: an experimental approach. Carcinogenesis 17: 1777–1779. doi: 10.1093/carcin/17.8.1777
- 60. Barousse AP, Costa JA, Eposto M, Laplume H, Segura EL (1980) Chagas disease and immunosuppression. Medicina 40 Suppl 1: 17–26.
- 61. dos Santos-Neto LL, Polcheira MF, Castro C, Lima RA, Simaan CK, et al. (2003) Trypanosoma cruzi high parasitemia in patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 36: 613–615. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822003000500012
- 62. Pinazo MJ, Espinosa G, Gallego M, Lopez-Chejade PL, Urbina JA, et al. (2010) Successful treatment with posaconazole of a patient with chronic Chagas disease and systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 583–587. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0620
- 63. Cossermelli W, Friedman H, Pastor EH, Nobre MR, Manzione A, et al. (1978) Polymyositis in Chagas's disease. Ann Rheum Dis 37: 277–280. doi: 10.1136/ard.37.3.277
- 64. Nishioka S de A (2000) Benznidazole in the primary chemoprophylaxis of the reactivation of Chagas' disease in chronic chagasic patients using corticosteroids at immunosuppressive doses: is there sufficient evidence for recommending its use? Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33: 83–85.
- 65. Rassi A, Amato Neto V, de Siqueira AF, Ferriolli Filho F, Amato VS, et al. (1999) Protective effect of benznidazole against parasite reactivation in patients chronically infected with Trypanosoma cruzi and treated with corticoids for associated diseases. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 32: 475–482. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86821999000500002
- 66. Tresoldi AT, Belangero VM, da Silva MT, Netto AA, Marques MC, Mezzacappa MA, et al. (1984) Doença de Chagas congênita: reagudização pela corticoterapia. Pediatr (São Paulo) 6: 207–210.
- 67. Kuschnir E, Sgammini H, Castro R, Evequoz C, Ledesma R, et al. (1985) Evaluation of cardiac function by radioisotopic angiography, in patients with chronic Chagas cardiopathy. Arq Bras Cardiol 45: 249–256.