• Loading metrics

Genetic polymorphisms of the IL6 and NOD2 genes are risk factors for inflammatory reactions in leprosy

  • Carolinne Sales-Marques ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Current address: Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Arapiraca, AL, Brazil.

    ‡ These authors share first authorship on this work.

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Cynthia Chester Cardoso ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Writing – original draft

    Current address: Laboratório de Virologia Molecular, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

    ‡ These authors share first authorship on this work.

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Lucia Elena Alvarado-Arnez,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Ximena Illaramendi,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Anna Maria Sales,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Mariana de Andréa Hacker,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • José Augusto da Costa Nery,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Roberta Olmo Pinheiro,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Euzenir Nunes Sarno,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Antonio Guilherme Pacheco,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa de Computação Científica (PROCC), FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

  • Milton Ozório Moraes

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Laboratório de Hanseníase, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil


Genetic polymorphisms of the IL6 and NOD2 genes are risk factors for inflammatory reactions in leprosy

  • Carolinne Sales-Marques, 
  • Cynthia Chester Cardoso, 
  • Lucia Elena Alvarado-Arnez, 
  • Ximena Illaramendi, 
  • Anna Maria Sales, 
  • Mariana de Andréa Hacker, 
  • Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa, 
  • José Augusto da Costa Nery, 
  • Roberta Olmo Pinheiro, 
  • Euzenir Nunes Sarno


The pathways that trigger exacerbated immune reactions in leprosy could be determined by genetic variations. Here, in a prospective approach, both genetic and non-genetic variables influencing the amount of time before the development of reactional episodes were studied using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and the genetic effect was estimated by the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. In a sample including 447 leprosy patients, we confirmed that gender (male), and high bacillary clinical forms are risk factors for leprosy reactions. From the 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the 8 candidate genes genotyped (TNF/LTA, IFNG, IL10, TLR1, NOD2, SOD2, and IL6) we observed statistically different survival curves for rs751271 at the NOD2 and rs2069845 at the IL6 genes (log-rank p-values = 0.002 and 0.023, respectively), suggesting an influence on the amount of time before developing leprosy reactions. Cox models showed associations between the SNPs rs751271 at NOD2 and rs2069845 at IL6 with leprosy reactions (HRGT = 0.45, p = 0.002; HRAG = 1.88, p = 0.0008, respectively). Finally, IL-6 and IFN-γ levels were confirmed as high, while IL-10 titers were low in the sera of reactional patients. Rs751271-GT genotype-bearing individuals correlated (p = 0.05) with lower levels of IL-6 in sera samples, corroborating the genetic results. Although the experimental size may be considered a limitation of the study, the findings confirm the association of classical variables such as sex and clinical forms with leprosy, demonstrating the consistency of the results. From the results, we conclude that SNPs at the NOD2 and IL6 genes are associated with leprosy reactions as an outcome. NOD2 also has a clear functional pro-inflammatory link that is coherent with the exacerbated responses observed in these patients.

Author summary

Leprosy reactions are abrupt inflammatory episodes that can occur before, during or after treatment. Although reactional episodes are the main cause of physical disabilities in patients, there are few genetic studies evaluating this outcome. We studied the influence of both risk factors and genetic markers in leprosy reaction outcomes. For this, we used a population including patients that either did or did not develop a reaction, and we performed a characterization of the genetic markers indicating susceptibility to leprosy. As a result, we identified how variables such as gender and clinical forms influence the amount of time before the occurrence of a reaction. In addition, we highlighted genetic markers related to the timing of the reaction’s occurrence, and associated them with reaction susceptibility. These markers were also related to the production of anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Our study describes the risk factors and genetic components associated with leprosy reactions and can help in the prognosis and monitoring of patients to prevent clinical complications.


Leprosy reactions affect up to 50% of patients [1]. They are episodes that disrupt the natural course of disease, characterized by a strong and abrupt reactivation of immune responses [24]. Generally, nerve injury is present, which may lead to permanent incapacities. At the onset of the reactions, high levels of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF [2,512] have been detected either in serum or skin lesions, and recently, cytokine profiling has identified promising host biomarkers to reaction in patients from Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Nepal [13]. Also, anti-LID-1 antibody levels were found to be high and persistent in multibacillary leprosy patients who developed a reaction, therefore suggesting that this is a putative serological predictive tool [14].

Reactions can be observed prior to, during, or after multidrug therapy (MDT) and are classified as type 1, or reversal reaction (T1R), and type 2, or erythema nodosum leprosum (T2R). T1R is common among patients exhibiting borderline clinical forms of leprosy and consists of an increased cell-mediated immune response with intense skin and nerve inflammation [15,16]. T2R is mainly observed in patients at the lepromatous pole, and is related to acute cellular immune response activation, leading to severe systemic symptoms [17,18]. Epidemiological studies [19] suggest that comorbidities and pregnancy are risk factors for reaction outcome [20,21]. In addition, medical variables including clinical form, positive bacillary index, introduction of multidrug therapy, age, and gender also play key roles in leprosy reactions [2224]. The genetic component influencing leprosy reactions, severe nerve impairment, and/or disabilities has been previously suggested [25]. Remarkable similarities were detected between granulomatous inflammatory responses and the presence of polymorphisms at genes such as NOD2 and LRRK2 associated with either leprosy reactions and other inflammatory diseases such as Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis (UC), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [26,27]. SNPs at NINJ1, TLR1, IL6, and TNFSF8 are clearly associated with reactional phenotypes (TR1 or TR2) [2832]. Recently, the first GWAS assessing reaction outcome has identified lncRNA as a risk factor to T1R [33]. However, so far few of these genes have been replicated or functionally characterized to support the epidemiological findings.

The present study was designed to investigate by means of survival curves the risk factors associated with reactional episodes by testing Brazilian leprosy patients and the effects of 15 SNPs at 8 genes. The markers included 11 SNPs selected to replicate the previously reported associations of the TLR1, NOD2, and IL6 genes and the remaining SNPs in 4 candidate genes TNF, LTA, IFNG, and IL10, in reference to markers previously associated with leprosy per se as an outcome [30,31,3437]. Here, we confirmed the association between IL6 and NOD2 SNPs and leprosy reactions among Brazilians, and demonstrated that the NOD2 genotype associated with a decreased risk for developing a reaction is also related to lower levels of IL-6 in the sera of non-reactional patients.


Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in the study as required by the Research Ethics Committee at Fiocruz (CEP-Fiocruz Protocol 151/01). Our institutional ethical committee board allowed to disclose data as de-identified dataset information regarding clinical parameters and genetic/functional data specific to the research article.

Subjects and study design

We performed a study including patients with a confirmed leprosy diagnosis between 1985 and 2008 that attended Souza Araújo Outpatient Reference Unit, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, who were followed for the development of a leprosy reaction (outcome). Experienced professionals performed the leprosy and leprosy reaction diagnoses after careful clinical examinations and histopathological analyses. Leprosy patients were classified according to Ridley–Jopling criteria [38]: I, indeterminate; TT, tuberculoid; BT, borderline tuberculoid; BB, borderline borderline; BL, borderline lepromatous; LL, lepromatous leprosy, and were treated as specified by the World Health Organization (WHO) according to the multibacillary (MB) and paucibacillary (PB) classifications. Reaction occurrence, as well as classification as either T1R or T2R, were determined by clinical examination and confirmed by histopathological evaluation [15,39]. Follow-up started upon initiation of leprosy treatment (MDT/WHO) and stopped on the day of the first reaction episode (event) or the date of the last follow-up available. When the date of the last follow-up was not available, we limited the observation time to 3 years after start of follow-up. Therefore, we defined the patients from this group as not reactional, considering that the great majority of the patients who develop reaction do so in the first year after the diagnosis. We excluded patients classified as TT since they are not at risk of developing reactions and also excluded individuals without available information regarding their treatment dates. Additional variables such as gender, age, ethnicity, and leprosy relapse were retrieved from each patient’s medical record. For the cytokine quantification (functional study), we used serum from a group of 84 leprosy patients diagnosed at the same outpatient unit. All the characteristics of the first-time patients diagnosed with leprosy are detailed in the S1 Table.

Selection of polymorphisms

The present study was designed to investigate the association of TNF/LTA, IL10, IFNG, IL6, TLR1, and NOD2 genes with leprosy reactions. The SNPs TNF -308G>A (rs1800629), LTA +252A>G (rs909253), IL10 -819C>T (rs1800871), and IFNG +874T>A (rs2430561) were selected based on previously published data which showed their association to leprosy per se among Brazilians [34,35,40]. The SNPs rs2069832, rs2069840, and rs2069845 were selected as tags that covered haplotype bins at IL6 locus. The tag SNP search was based on data from the HapMap Genome Browser release #27 ( using Caucasians or African reference populations (CEU and YRI, respectively). The same strategy led to the selection of the SNPs rs751271, rs2066843, and rs748855 at the NOD2 gene. The remaining NOD2 SNPs (rs7194886, rs9302752, and rs8057341) were marker candidates retrieved from the literature [41]. TLR1 SNPs rs5743592 and rs4833095 were included in this study in order to replicate previous findings regarding their association to leprosy per se and reactional episodes [29,30,4244].

DNA extraction and SNP genotyping

DNA was extracted from frozen blood samples using a salting-out precipitation method [45]. SNPs at TNF/LTA, IFNG, IL10, and TLR1 loci were genotyped as described [34,35,40,42]. SNPs at the NOD2 and IL6 genes were genotyped using TaqMan® assays according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, CA, USA). Briefly, amplifications were carried out in a final volume of 5 μL containing 2.5 μL of the TaqMan® Universal Master Mix, 0.125 μL of the TaqMan mix (primers and probes), and 20–50 ng of template. PCR reactions were performed on ABI Prism 7000 and StepOne Plus Sequence Detection Systems (Life Technologies, CA, USA). Individuals with missing genotypes were excluded from the statistical analysis.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Serum cytokine levels from leprosy patients were quantified by ELISA, using Millipore’s MILLIPLEX® Human Cytokine/Chemokine panel commercial kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following cytokines were included in the kit: IL1-β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p40, IL-12P70, IL-13, IL-17, TNF-α.

Statistical analysis

First, we performed a descriptive analysis to compare the influence of the considered variables on the length of time before the development of a leprosy reaction using survival curves. Proportional hazards assumption for different covariates in the Cox regression model was tested using Schoenfeld residuals [46]. All variables were adequate in the model, except for the clinical forms variable, which was added as strata in the model to avoid the effect of non-proportionality over time in the analyses. The genotype curves were obtained by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank statistic. Age at leprosy diagnosis (continuous variable categorized as ≤ 40 years old and > 40 years old), gender, ethnicity, leprosy relapse, and clinical forms were the analyzed variables. Leprosy clinical forms were grouped into three levels according to the risk of developing leprosy reactions: I/BT/BB, BL, and LL. The median time until event (MST) was calculated for each variable using Kaplan-Meir method. Then, to estimate the associations between genetic markers and leprosy reaction (outcome), crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR and aHR, respectively) at 95% confidence interval and p-value were calculated using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Variables that showed significance with a reaction outcome in the survival curves were used to adjust the HR in the Cox model (possible confounders). For the cytokine measurements, the median values from each genotype group were compared by the Mann–Whitney U test (two groups of comparison) or by an ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis test (three groups). Missing data was excluded from the analysis. The statistical analyses for the Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional-hazards regression model, as well as the survival graphical curves, were performed in the R environment for Windows [47], version 3.1.2, using the packages “survival” and “genetics.” The cytokine analysis was conducted using GraphPad Instat software (GraphPad Software 3.0 for Windows, San Diego, CA) and considered statistical significance to be a p-value < 0.05.


Patients and clinical outcomes

Of 567 potentially eligible patients, 120 were excluded due to missing follow-up information, which are described in S2 Table. Therefore, a total of 447 patients were enrolled in the genetic study among whom 222 developed leprosy reactions with an overall median survival time (MST) of 165 weeks until the reaction’s occurrence (Table 1, S1A Fig). The clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in the study, including their age, gender, ethnicity, leprosy relapse, and clinical classification are summarized in S1 Table and Table 1, along with the results of the log-rank test.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of leprosy patients according to leprosy reaction outcome.

As observed, the length of time before a leprosy reaction, as described by survival curves, shows a significant difference when considering the variables of gender (p = 0.002) and clinical form (p < 0.001). Regarding the median time until event (MST), men developed reactions earlier than women (MST = 86 weeks and 182 weeks, respectively). According to the clinical forms, the lower median was observed among LL patients when compared to the other groups (MSTLL = 39 weeks vs MSTBL = 59 weeks and MSTI/BB/BT = 182 weeks), as presented in Table 1, S1B and S1C Fig.

Genetic association with leprosy reaction

To investigate the association between genetic markers and reaction outcomes we constructed survival curves for each SNP (stratified by genotype groups) as a descriptive approach to evaluate the occurrence of reaction in leprosy patients over time. We estimated that our sample was sufficient in detecting a genetic risk effect of 1.8 with a statistical power of 79%, considering single nucleotide variants with a minor allele frequency of 0.10 under the additive model.

From the 15 candidate SNPs (total counts and frequencies detailed at S3 Table), 2 showed different Kaplan–Meier curves between genotype groups (log-rank p-value < 0.05). Patients with the AG genotype for IL6 rs2069845 developed reactions faster (MST = 116 weeks) than other genotypes (MSTAA = 195, MSTGG = 295 weeks; p = 0.023), as illustrated in Fig 1A. In addition, NOD2 rs751271 homozygous patients (TT) developed reactions significantly earlier (MST = 62 weeks) than the GT (MST = 165 weeks) and GG (MST = 194 weeks) genotypes (Fig 1B). The log-rank results from the Kaplan–Meier comparisons of all SNPs tested are presented in S4 Table.

Fig 1. Survival curves of leprosy reactions by NOD2 and IL6 SNPs.

Cumulative proportion of patients who developed leprosy reactions according to the IL6 rs2069845 (A) and NOD2 rs751271 (B) genotypes. The + symbol indicates censured samples. P-values were determined by log-rank tests.

To estimate the SNP effects on reaction occurrence, the Cox proportional-hazards regression model was applied including adjusted analyses for gender and clinical forms (strata). The NOD2 rs751271-GT genotype and G-allele carriers (GT/GG) were associated with protection against a reaction’s occurrence, even after adjustment (aHR = 0.45, p = 0.002 and aHR = 0.56, p = 0.01, respectively), as presented in Table 2. On the other hand, AG genotype and AG/GG carriers of IL6 rs2069845 were associated with having an increased risk of developing a reaction (aHR = 1.88, p = 0.0008 and aHR = 1.73, p = 0.002, respectively). Genotypic information for individual patients is detailed in S5 Table.

Table 2. Results of Cox proportional-hazards model for NOD2 rs751271 and IL6 rs2069845 polymorphisms.

Polymorphisms and the activation of an inflammatory response

We evaluated serum cytokine levels to investigate whether the SNPs correlated with the inflammatory profile in leprosy patients. Of 84 individuals (S1 Table), 39 developed reactions, including 22 T1R and 17 T2R subtypes. Overall, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ dosage (pg/mL) confirmed the literature reports in which reactional patients exhibited higher pro-inflammatory and lower anti-inflammatory cytokine levels (Fig 2). The quantification showed that IL-6 (median: reaction group 0.68 vs. no reaction group 0.25, p = 0.016) and IFN-γ (median: reaction group 0.61 vs. no reaction group 0.25, p = 0.017) were higher in the reaction group (Fig 2A and 2B). Also corroborating previous findings, IL-10 levels were lower in the reaction group (median: reaction group 0.40 vs. no reaction group: 0.71, p = 0.027), as shown in Fig 2C. The cytokines quantification for each of the patients analyzed in the functional approach are described in S6 Table. The remaining cytokines from the kit were not analyzed because they did not reach the detection limit.

Fig 2. Serum dosage of IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 and in leprosy patients that did not develop (No Reaction) or developed (Reaction) a reaction.

(A) IL-6 dosage; No Reaction, N = 46; Reaction, N = 31. (B) IFN-γ dosage; No Reaction, N = 44; Reaction, N = 34. (C) IL-10 dosage; No Reaction, N = 41; Reaction, N = 23. The values were converted to a logarithmic scale. Cytokine production (pg/mL) was evaluated by ELISA and the median values were compared by a Mann–Whitney t test.

Then, the cytokine levels from patients were stratified in accordance with IL6 and NOD2 SNPs (Fig 3). The cytokine dosage showed a heterogeneous distribution among the patients, and stratified analysis showed no differences between groups in either the patients overall (S2 Fig) or the reactional patients (S3 Fig). Considering the non-reactional leprosy patients, IFN-γ and IL-10 levels showed no differences between genotype groups for either of the tested polymorphisms (Fig 3C–3F). Neither was IL-6 production associated with IL6 rs2069845 SNP (Fig 3A). However, individuals carrying NOD2 rs751271-GT showed a borderline difference (p = 0.05), suggesting lower IL-6 production (GT median: 0.008) as compared to GG individuals (GG median: 0.53) (Fig 3B). Unfortunately, we did not have patients with the NOD2 rs751271-TT genotype for a functional analysis.

Fig 3.

IL-6 (A and B), IFN-γ (C and D) and IL-10 (E and F) dosage from non-reactional leprosy patients stratified by IL6 (rs2069845) and NOD2 (rs751271) polymorphisms. Data are represented on a log scale. Cytokine production was evaluated by ELISA and the median values were compared by a Mann–Whitney t test. rs2069845 vs. IL-6: AA, N = 10; AG, N = 10; GG, N = 1. rs751271 vs. IL-6: GG, N = 9; GT, N = 12. rs2069845 vs. IFN-γ: AA, N = 11; AG, N = 9; GG, N = 2. rs751271 vs. IFN-γ: GG, N = 9; GT, N = 12. rs2069845 vs. IL-10: AA, N = 10; AG, N = 9; GG, N = 2. rs751271 vs. IL-10: GG, N = 9; GT, N = 11.


In the present study, we have found two polymorphisms that, independently of other non-genetic risk factors, were associated with inflammatory reactions in leprosy. Considering that reactions are serious, and remain an unpredictable outcome, we decided to include the time of occurrence in the model using survival analysis, which tests the prognostic value of polymorphisms as genetic markers. As a result, we observed that patients with NOD2 rs751271-TT or carrying an IL6 rs2069845-G allele developed reactions faster than those with other genotypes/alleles, suggesting that these SNPs are good prognostic markers for reactional episodes. Moreover, NOD2 rs751271-GT individuals had a statistically significant decreased risk of developing reactions and, in a smaller group of patients, also showed lower serum IL-6, but not IL-10 or IFN-γ, levels.

SNPs at NOD2 were previously associated with protection against reaction outcomes in a population from Nepal [36]. NOD2 acts as a sensor of mycobacterial components and contributes to bacterial killing by activating the NF-kB pathway, an inflammation cascade, and an interleukin-32-dependent pathway. Also, NOD2 appears as a key player in autophagy, including its genetic association with Crohn’s disease [4850]. Uncontrolled inflammation is driven by an inability to clear bacteria through autophagy in patients carrying specific alleles, and that is followed by exacerbated pro-inflammatory response. In fact, here, NOD2 rs751271-TT individuals have a higher risk of developing a reaction per se. None of the individuals enrolled in the functional analysis exhibited the TT genotype. Our results suggest that rs751271-GT individuals have the lowest risk of a premature reactional outcome and these individuals have lower productions of IL-6 during an unreactional state. It could be hypothesized that rs751271-GT carriers have the most balanced production of cytokines—in this case IL-6 that could be used as a readout—and during the natural course of leprosy (in non-reactional patients), these patients showed a decreased risk of experiencing a reactional episode. On the other hand, rs751271-GG individuals have higher IL-6 and a moderate risk of developing reactions (survival curves). TT individuals would possibly exhibit a similar high IL-6 production pro-inflammatory profile, although unfortunately we did not have any patients with this genotype in our sample so we could not perform such a comparison. This hypothesis is illustrated in Fig 4.

Fig 4. Graphical abstract to illustrate a possible effect of NOD2 rs751271 SNP in leprosy reactions.

Patients with the rs751271-GT genotype had lower IL-6 levels, which could influence the inflammatory balance and the susceptibility to or protection against leprosy reactions. NS: Not statistically significant.

The results from different studies have demonstrated the emergence of an inflammatory immune response during reactional episodes [4], and a pro-inflammatory signature to reactions was suggested recently by Khadge and colleagues [13]. Probably, polymorphisms are contributing to control the inflammatory profile in leprosy patients, influencing the reaction’s development, when it occurs, and its severity.

IL6 has been previously associated with leprosy reactions in other populations and by using different study designs. The IL6 rs2069840-G allele was associated with protection against and IL6 rs2069845-G with risk of T2R in a population from Goiania, Brazil [31], which is, at least in part, corroborated by our genetic results indicating that IL6 rs2069845-G is associated with an increased risk of reactional episodes per se. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that acts in the acute inflammatory response and activation of Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes. IL-6 also inhibits T regulatory (Treg) cells, mediating the balance between pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive T-cells [51], which is consistent with the central role of IL-6 as a prognostic molecule in chronic inflammation. Our data confirmed higher levels of IL-6 among reactional patients, but a stratification of IL-6 genotypes failed to confirm that IL-6 rs2069845-G carriers secrete more IL-6 in serum. In fact, SNPs only partly and transiently regulate gene expression and maybe the period for the detection of IL-6 in the sera that could be impacted by SNPs may be different from what we recovered in the present study.

We have additionally investigated the classic candidate genes TNF/LTA, IFNG, and IL10, which were consistently associated with leprosy per se [35,40,52] but, despite the central roles of these cytokines in leprosy reactions [5], were not genetically associated with reaction outcomes in our study. We were also unable to detect any association of TLR1 SNPs, although the previously reported data regarding the association of this gene in other populations [30]. Variations in study designs and linkage disequilibrium patterns may explain these divergent results.

Recently, SNPs at TNFSF pathways were consistently associated with T1R outcomes in populations from Vietnam and Brazil [32,53]. These and other possible candidates still need to be confirmed among our Southern Brazilian population. Also, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that underlie the genetic susceptibility of reactional episodes since in this study we observed that the presence of risk alleles do not have additive or synergistic effects in a way that would make the combination of some of these most important SNPs as a genetic test feasible. We understand that the sample size could be considered a limitation of our study, mainly due to low patient compliance, however, the results confirm certain classical variables (gender and clinical forms) as risk factors for reaction, which implies that our genetic data is consistent and should be used in a score to estimate the risk of multibacillary patients developing reactional episodes. Also, we have to consider other possible sources of bias such as non-genetic variables that could determine the development of reactions for which we did not have any available information, amongst them pregnancy, modifications in therapeutic scheme, and comorbidities. Nevertheless, the specific variables for which we have information were utilized as covariates and adjusted for in the Cox model.

The issue of correcting for multiple comparisons has been recently discussed in epidemiology. Even though it is desirable to control for type I error, there are many instances when it is not sound to consider that a priori all the hypotheses being tested are false. As it is our case we have performed a genetic study at candidate gene/SNPs level, we did not consider it applicable to perform corrections for multiple comparisons, since it could increase the Type II error and not finding a true association [54].

Despite the studies suggesting the influence of host and environmental factors on leprosy reactions, the complete mechanisms of their occurrence remain unclear. However, there is no doubt that reactions are the main cause of physical disabilities. Results obtained from a prospective study on leprosy patients from Brazil showed that 30% of the reactional cases were associated with persistent physical impairment [55]. The development of a prognostic panel with the capacity to predict the likelihood of progressing to reactions indicates a possible strategy that could contribute to the surveillance of patients with greater chances of developing clinical complications and possibly interfere with prophylaxis in order to prevent future disabilities.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. STROBE checklist for cohort study including information about the present study.


S1 Fig. Non-genetic variables affecting reaction outcome.

Cumulative proportion of reaction occurrence among leprosy patients overall (A), leprosy patients by gender (B), and by clinical forms (C). Kaplan–Meier curves were compared using a log-rank test. The + symbol indicates censured samples. P = p-value from a log-rank test. F = female, M = male, I = indeterminate leprosy, BT = borderline tuberculoid, BB = borderline borderline, BL = borderline lepromatous, LL = leprosy lepromatous.


S2 Fig. Cytokine levels in leprosy patients: Non-carriers and carriers of the minor allele of IL6 rs2069845 and NOD2 rs751271 SNPs.

IL-6 (A and B), IFN-γ (C and D), and IL-10 (E and F) levels were quantified in the serum of leprosy patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Median dosage values were compared between groups by a Mann–Whitney t test. Sample size (N): A) AA = 18, AG+GG = 18; B) GG = 14, GT+TT = 21; C) AA = 22, AG+GG = 21; D) GG = 17, GT+TT = 21; E) AA = 17, AG+GG = 20; F) GG = 15; GT+TT = 20.


S3 Fig. Cytokine levels in reactional leprosy patients: Non-carriers and carriers of the minor allele of IL6 rs2069845 and NOD2 rs751271 SNPs.

IL-6 (A and B), IFN-γ (C and D), and IL-10 (E and F) levels were quantified in the serum from reactional leprosy patients using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Median dosage values were compared between groups by a Mann–Whitney t test. Sample size (N): (A) AA = 8, AG+GG = 8; (B) GG = 5, GT+TT = 9; (C) AA = 11, AG+GG = 11; (D) GG = 9, GT+TT = 13; (E) AA = 7, AG+GG = 9; (F) GG = 6, GT+TT = 8.


S1 Table. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in the first diagnosis of leprosy.


S2 Table. Description of excluded patients from survival analysis of leprosy genetic study.


S3 Table. Total count and frequencies for genotypic and minor allele carriers for each of the studied polymorphisms.


S4 Table. Associations between SNPs and time to leprosy reaction development.


S5 Table. Genotypic information for individual patients from the genetic study.


S6 Table. Cytokines quantification for each of the patients analyzed in the functional study.



We thank all the patients for agreeing to participate in this study, and Scribendi for manuscript proofreading and editing (editor code 1117).


  1. 1. Britton WJ, Lockwood DNJ. Leprosy. Lancet. 2004. pp. 1209–1219. pmid:15081655
  2. 2. Sampaio EP, Moraes MO, Nery J a, Santos a R, Matos HC, Sarno EN. Pentoxifylline decreases in vivo and in vitro tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) production in lepromatous leprosy patients with erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL). Clinical and experimental immunology. 1998. pp. 300–308. pmid:9486396
  3. 3. Moraes MO, Sarno EN, Teles RMB, Almeida AS, Saraiva BCC, Nery JAC, et al. Anti-inflammatory drugs block cytokine mRNA accumulation in the skin and improve the clinical condition of reactional leprosy patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115: 935–941. pmid:11121122
  4. 4. Oliveira RB, Moraes MO, Oliveira EB, Sarno EN, Nery JA, Sampaio EP. Neutrophils isolated from leprosy patients release TNF-alpha and exhibit accelerated apoptosis in vitro. JLeukocBiol. 1999;65: 364–371.
  5. 5. Moraes MO, Sarno EN, Almeida AS, Saraiva BC, Nery JA, Martins RC, et al. Cytokine mRNA expression in leprosy: a possible role for interferon-gamma and interleukin-12 in reactions (RR and ENL). Scand J Immunol. England; 1999;50: 541–549. pmid:10564558
  6. 6. Sampaio EP, Malta AM, Sarno EN, Kaplan G. Effect of rhuIFN-gamma treatment in multibacillary leprosy patients. IntJLeprOther MycobactDis. 1996;64: 268–273.
  7. 7. Sampaio EP, Moreira AL, Sarno EN, Malta AM, Kaplan G. Prolonged treatment with recombinant interferon gamma induces erythema nodosum leprosum in lepromatous leprosy patients. J Exp Med. 1992;175: 1729–1737. pmid:1588290
  8. 8. Sampaio EP, Sarno EN. Expression and cytokine secretion in the states of immune reactivation in leprosy. Brazilian J Med Biol Res = Rev Bras Pesqui medicas e Biol. Brazil; 1998;31: 69–76.
  9. 9. Sarno EN, Grau GE, Vieira LM, Nery J a. Serum levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta during leprosy reactional states. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;84: 103–108. pmid:2015700
  10. 10. Andersson AK, Chaduvula M, Atkinson SE, Khanolkar-Young S, Jain S, Suneetha L, et al. Effects of prednisolone treatment on cytokine expression in patients with leprosy type 1 reactions. Infect Immun. 2005;73: 3725–3733. pmid:15908402
  11. 11. Atkinson SE, Khanolkar-Young S, Marlowe S, Jain S, Reddy RG, Suneetha S, et al. Detection of IL-13, IL-10, and IL-6 in the leprosy skin lesions of patients during prednisolone treatment for type 1 (T1R) reactions. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2004;72: 27–34. pmid:15217318
  12. 12. Van Brakel WH, Nicholls PG, Das L, Barkataki P, Maddali P, Lockwood DNJ, et al. The INFIR Cohort Study: assessment of sensory and motor neuropathy in leprosy at baseline. Lepr Rev. 2005;76: 277–95. Available: pmid:16411508
  13. 13. Khadge S, Banu S, Bobosha K, van der Ploeg-van Schip JJ, Goulart IM, Thapa P, et al. Longitudinal immune profiles in type 1 leprosy reactions in Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia and Nepal. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15: 477. pmid:26510990
  14. 14. Mizoguti D de F, Hungria EM, Freitas AA, Oliveira RM, Cardoso LPV, Costa MB, et al. Multibacillary leprosy patients with high and persistent serum antibodies to leprosy IDRI diagnostic-1/LID-1: Higher susceptibility to develop type 2 reactions. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110: 914–920. pmid:26560982
  15. 15. Nery JA da C, Bernardes Filho F, Quintanilha J, Machado AM, Oliveira S de SC, Sales AM. Understanding the type 1 reactional state for early diagnosis and treatment: a way to avoid disability in leprosy. An Bras Dermatol. Brazil; 2013;88: 787–792. pmid:24173185
  16. 16. Andrade PR, Pinheiro RO, Sales AM, Illarramendi X, Barbosa MG de M, Moraes MO, et al. Type 1 reaction in leprosy: a model for a better understanding of tissue immunity under an immunopathological condition. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015;11: 391–407. pmid:25666357
  17. 17. Nery JAC, Vieira LMM, De Matos HJ, Gallo MEN, Sarno EN. Reactional states in multibacillary hansen disease patients during multidrug therapy. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1998;40: 363–370. pmid:10436656
  18. 18. Kahawita IP, Lockwood DNJ. Towards understanding the pathology of erythema nodosum leprosum. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008. pp. 329–337. pmid:18313706
  19. 19. Van Veen NH, Roberts AE, Mahato ME, Velema JP. Evaluation of simplified tests for the diagnosis of nerve function impairment in leprosy: the Sensory Motor Screening (SMS) study. Lepr Rev. 2009;80: 51–64. Available: pmid:19472852
  20. 20. Motta ACF, Pereira KJ, Tarquínio DC, Vieira MB, Miyake K, Foss NT. Leprosy reactions: coinfections as a possible risk factor. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67: 1145–8. pmid:23070340
  21. 21. Ramu G, Desikan K V. Reactions in borderline leprosy. Indian J Lepr. 2002;74: 115–128. pmid:12708730
  22. 22. Antunes DE, Araujo S, Ferreira GP, Cunha ACSR da, Costa AV da, Goncalves MA, et al. Identification of clinical, epidemiological and laboratory risk factors for leprosy reactions during and after multidrug therapy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. Brazil; 2013;108: 901–908. pmid:24271045
  23. 23. Pocaterra L, Jain S, Reddy R, Muzaffarullah S, Torres O, Suneetha S, et al. Clinical course of erythema nodosum leprosum: An 11-year cohort study in Hyderabad, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74: 868–879. pmid:16687695
  24. 24. Ranque B, Nguyen VT, Vu HT, Nguyen TH, Nguyen NB, Pham XK, et al. Age is an important risk factor for onset and sequelae of reversal reactions in Vietnamese patients with leprosy. Clin Infect Dis. United States; 2007;44: 33–40. pmid:17143812
  25. 25. Fava V, Orlova M, Cobat A, Alcaïs A, Mira M, Schurr E. Genetics of leprosy reactions: An overview. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107: 132–142. pmid:23283464
  26. 26. Grant A V, Alter A, Huong NT, Orlova M, Van Thuc N, Ba NN, et al. Crohn’s disease susceptibility genes are associated with leprosy in the Vietnamese population. J Infect Dis. 2012;206: 1763–1767. pmid:22984114
  27. 27. Fava VM, Manry J, Cobat A, Orlova M, Van Thuc N, Ba NN, et al. A Missense LRRK2 Variant Is a Risk Factor for Excessive Inflammatory Responses in Leprosy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10. pmid:26844546
  28. 28. Cardoso CC, Martinez AN, Guimarães PEM, Mendes CT, Pacheco AG, de Oliveira RB, et al. Ninjurin 1 asp110ala single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with protection in leprosy nerve damage. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;190: 131–138. pmid:17825431
  29. 29. Misch EA, Macdonald M, Ranjit C, Sapkota BR, Wells RD, Siddiqui MR, et al. Human TLR1 deficiency is associated with impaired mycobacterial signaling and protection from leprosy reversal reaction. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2. pmid:18461142
  30. 30. Schuring RP, Hamann L, Faber WR, Pahan D, Richardus JH, Schumann RR, et al. Polymorphism N248S in the human Toll-like receptor 1 gene is related to leprosy and leprosy reactions. J Infect Dis. 2009;199: 1816–1819. pmid:19456232
  31. 31. Sousa ALM, Fava VM, Sampaio LH, Martelli CMT, Costa MB, Mira MT, et al. Genetic and immunological evidence implicates interleukin 6 as a susceptibility gene for leprosy type 2 reaction. J Infect Dis. 2012;205: 1417–1424. pmid:22459738
  32. 32. Fava VM, Cobat A, Van Thuc N, Latini ACP, Stefani MMA, Belone AF, et al. Association of TNFSF8 regulatory variants with excessive inflammatory responses but not leprosy per se. J Infect Dis. 2015;211: 968–977. pmid:25320285
  33. 33. Fava VM, Manry J, Cobat A, Orlova M, Van Thuc N, Moraes MO, et al. A genome wide association study identifies a lncRna as risk factor for pathological inflammatory responses in leprosy. PLoS Genet. United States; 2017;13: e1006637. pmid:28222097
  34. 34. Cardoso CC, Pereira AC, Brito-de-Souza VN, Dias-Baptista IM, Maniero VC, Venturini J, et al. IFNG +874 T&gt;A single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with leprosy among Brazilians. Hum Genet. 2010;128: 481–90. pmid:20714752
  35. 35. Cardoso CC, Pereira AC, Brito-de-Souza VN, Duraes SMB, Ribeiro-Alves M, Nery JAC, et al. TNF -308G>A single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with leprosy among Brazilians: a genetic epidemiology assessment, meta-analysis, and functional study. J Infect Dis. United States; 2011;204: 1256–1263. pmid:21917899
  36. 36. Berrington WR, Macdonald M, Khadge S, Sapkota BR, Janer M, Hagge DA, et al. Common polymorphisms in the NOD2 gene region are associated with leprosy and its reactive states. J Infect Dis. 2010;201: 1422–35. pmid:20350193
  37. 37. Alvarado-Arnez LE, Amaral EP, Sales-Marques C, Durães SMB, Cardoso CC, Sarno EN, et al. Association of IL10 polymorphisms and leprosy: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10. pmid:26340474
  38. 38. Ridley DS JW. Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966;34: 255–273. pmid:5950347
  39. 39. Scollard DM, Smith T, Bhoopat L, Theetranont C, Rangdaeng S, Morens DM. Epidemiologic characteristics of leprosy reactions. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1994;62: 559–67. Available: pmid:7868954
  40. 40. Pereira a C, Brito-de-Souza VN, Cardoso CC, Dias-Baptista IMF, Parelli FPC, Venturini J, et al. Genetic, epidemiological and biological analysis of interleukin-10 promoter single-nucleotide polymorphisms suggests a definitive role for -819C/T in leprosy susceptibility. Genes Immun. 2009;10: 174–180. pmid:19110537
  41. 41. Zhang F-R, Huang W, Chen S-M, Sun L-D, Liu H, Li Y, et al. Genomewide association study of leprosy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: 2609–18. pmid:20018961
  42. 42. De Sales Marques C, Brito-De-Souza VN, Guerreiro LTA, Martins JH, Amaral EP, Cardoso CC, et al. Toll-like receptor 1 N248s single-nucleotide polymorphism is associated with leprosy risk and regulates immune activation during mycobacterial infection. J Infect Dis. 2013;208: 120–129. pmid:23547143
  43. 43. Johnson CM, Lyle E a, Omueti KO, Stepensky V a, Yegin O, Alpsoy E, et al. Cutting edge: A common polymorphism impairs cell surface trafficking and functional responses of TLR1 but protects against leprosy. J Immunol. 2007;178: 7520–7524. pmid:17548585
  44. 44. Wong SH, Gochhait S, Malhotra D, Pettersson FH, Teo YY, Khor CC, et al. Leprosy and the adaptation of human toll-like receptor 1. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6: e1000979. pmid:20617178
  45. 45. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16: 1215. pmid:3344216
  46. 46. Bellera C, MacGrogan G, Debled M, de Lara C, Brouste V, Mathoulin-Pelissier S. Variables with time-varying effects and the Cox model: Some statistical concepts illustrated with a prognostic factor study in breast cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10: 20. pmid:20233435
  47. 47. R Development Core Team R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2011.
  48. 48. Cooney R, Baker J, Brain O, Danis B, Pichulik T, Allan P, et al. NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat Med. 2010;16: 90–7. pmid:19966812
  49. 49. Schenk M, Krutzik SR, Sieling P a, Lee DJ, Teles RMB, Ochoa MT, et al. NOD2 triggers an interleukin-32-dependent human dendritic cell program in leprosy. Nat Med. 2012;18: 555–63. pmid:22447076
  50. 50. Chauhan S, Mandell MA, Deretic V. Mechanism of action of the tuberculosis and Crohn disease risk factor IRGM in autophagy. Autophagy. 2016;12: 429–431. pmid:26313894
  51. 51. Waldner MJ, Neurath MF. Master regulator of intestinal disease: IL-6 in chronic inflammation and cancer development. Seminars in Immunology. 2014. pp. 75–79. pmid:24447345
  52. 52. Cardoso CC, Pereira AC, De Sales Marques C, Moraes MO. Leprosy susceptibility: genetic variations regulate innate and adaptive immunity, and disease outcome. Future Microbiol. 2011;6: 533–549. pmid:21585261
  53. 53. Fava VM, Sales-Marques C, Alcaïs A, Moraes MO, Schurr E. Age-Dependent Association of TNFSF15/TNFSF8 Variants and Leprosy Type 1 Reaction [Internet]. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017. p. 155. Available: pmid:28261213
  54. 54. Rothman KJ. Six persistent research misconceptions. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014. pp. 1060–1064. pmid:24452418
  55. 55. de Oliveira DT, Sherlock J, de Melo EV, Rollemberg KCV, da Paixão TRS, Abuawad YG, et al. Clinical variables associated with leprosy reactions and persistence of physical impairment. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46: 600–604. pmid:24270251