PLoS Negl Trop DisplosplosntdsPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-2735Public Library of ScienceSan Francisco, USAPNTD-D-13-0032310.1371/journal.pntd.0002318Research ArticleBiologyMicrobiologyVector biologyMosquitoesViral vectorsVirologyEmerging viral diseasesEmerging infectious diseasesMedicineInfectious diseasesNeglected tropical diseasesArboviral infectionsVectors and hostsMosquitoesVeterinary scienceVeterinary diseasesVeterinary virologyZoonotic diseasesIlheus Virus Isolation in the Pantanal, West-Central BrazilIlheus Virus in the Pantanal, BrazilPauvolid-CorrêaAlex123*KenneyJoan L.2Couto-LimaDinair1CamposZilca M. S.4SchatzmayrHermann G.1NogueiraRita M. R.1BraultAaron C.2KomarNicholas2*Laboratório de Flavivírus, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrasilArbovirus Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of AmericaFulbright Visiting Researcher in Doctorate Sandwich Program at CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of AmericaEmbrapa Pantanal, Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, BrasilTurellMichael J.EditorUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, United States of America* E-mail: pauvolid@ioc.fiocruz.br (APC); nkomar@cdc.gov (NK)
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: APC HGS RMRN ACB NK. Performed the experiments: APC JLK DCL ZMSC. Analyzed the data: APC RMRN JLK ACB NK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: APC ACB NK. Wrote the paper: APC NK.
72013187201377e23181320134620132013This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
The wetlands of the Brazilian Pantanal host large concentrations of diverse wildlife species and hematophagous arthropods, conditions that favor the circulation of zoonotic arboviruses. A recent study from the Nhecolândia sub-region of Pantanal reported serological evidence of various flaviviruses, including West Nile virus and Ilheus virus (ILHV). According to the age of seropositive horses, at least three flaviviruses, including ILHV, circulated in the Brazilian Pantanal between 2005 and 2009. To extend this study, we collected 3,234 adult mosquitoes of 16 species during 2009 and 2010 in the same sub-region. Mosquito pool homogenates were assayed for infectious virus on C6/36 and Vero cell monolayers and also tested for flaviviral RNA by a group-specific real-time RT-PCR. One pool containing 50 non-engorged female specimens of Aedes scapularis tested positive for ILHV by culture and for ILHV RNA by real-time RT-PCR, indicating a minimum infection rate of 2.5 per 1000. Full-length genomic sequence exhibited 95% identity to the only full genome sequence available for ILHV. The present data confirm the circulation of ILHV in the Brazilian Pantanal.
Author Summary
Ilheus virus causes mainly asymptomatic infections in humans with rare reports of encephalitis in northern South America. Ilheus virus is believed to be maintained in zoonotic cycles between birds and mosquitoes in Central and South America. Aiming to detect Ilheus virus and other arboviruses in the Pantanal region of west-central Brazil, host-seeking mosquitoes were collected by aspiration as they landed on horses, research team members, and caimans. Resting mosquitoes were collected from the walls inside a local residence and additional flying mosquitoes were captured in light traps. We isolated a Brazilian strain of Ilheus virus from a pool of 50 Aedes scapularis mosquitoes that were collected while landing on a member of our research team, in April, 2010. Our finding confirms a recent report of Ilheus virus activity in the Pantanal derived from the detection of neutralizing antibodies in horses. The anthropophilic behavior of the infected mosquito(es) suggests a risk of Ilheus virus transmission from mosquitoes to humans in the region. We provide the virus' complete genomic sequence and present its phylogenetic relationship with other isolates.
Funding was provided by ASM, CNPq, CDC, Fulbright, CAPES, FAPERJ and FIOCRUZ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Introduction
Ilheus virus (ILHV) was first described in 1944, when it was isolated from Aedes and Psorophora spp. mosquitoes during an epidemiological investigation of yellow fever in the city of Ilhéus, state of Bahia, northeast Brazil [1], [2]. According to the Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, ILHV is included in the Ntaya virus group [3]. ILHV causes mainly asymptomatic infections in humans with rare reports of encephalitis throughout northern South America [4], [5]. Human infection with ILHV has been reported in Trinidad, Panama, Colombia, French Guyana, Brazil, Ecuador and Bolivia [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].
ILHV is believed to be maintained in zoonotic cycles between birds and mosquitoes and has been isolated in Central and South America primarily from mosquitoes [13], [14], [15], [16]. ILHV has been previously isolated from eight mosquito genera, but also from sentinel monkeys, man and birds. In antibody surveys, neutralizing antibodies for ILHV have been found in rodents, birds, sentinel monkeys and man [17]. In the 1990s, ILHV was isolated from wild birds in southeast Brazil [18].
Little is known about ILHV infections in domestic animals. In the 1990s, a serological investigation conducted among equines from the Pantanal region of west-central Brazil found neutralizing antibodies to ILHV suggesting its circulation in the region [19]. In 2009, a flavivirus serosurvey conducted in the same area among equines from the Nhecolândia sub-region of the Pantanal detected evidence of past infection with, in increasing order of seroprevalence, Cacipacore virus (CPCV), West Nile virus (WNV), Saint Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and ILHV [20].
The Brazilian Pantanal is a seasonally flooded surface of approximately 140,000 km2. The area is divided into 11 sub-regions based on characteristics of seasonal floods, physiography and ecology. Nhecolândia is the second largest of these sub-regions with approximately 27,000 km2 and the world's largest and most diverse area of subtropical lakes encompassing approximately 10,000 lakes [21], [22], and a human population of less than 22,500 in 2010 [23].
The wetlands of the Brazilian Pantanal host large concentrations of diverse wildlife species and hematophagous arthropods, conditions that favor the circulation of zoonotic arboviruses. In spite of scarce data concerning arbovirus vectors in the area, the local movement of mosquito species previously reported as arbovirus vectors has been reported in the north and south of Pantanal [24], [25].
Serological surveys conducted in local horses have found neutralizing antibodies for at least eight arboviruses, including the bunyaviruses Tacaiuma virus and Maguari virus, the alphaviruses eastern equine encephalitis virus and western equine encephalitis virus and the flaviviruses CPCV, SLEV, WNV and ILHV [19], [20], [26], [27].
Despite the recent detection of neutralizing antibodies to various flaviviruses in horses from the Nhecolândia sub-region, circulation of these arboviruses in this area was never confirmed by virus isolation. Therefore, in an effort to detect flaviviruses currently being transmitted in this region, we collected and tested adult female mosquitoes for infectious virus and for flavivirus RNA detection.
Materials and MethodsStudy area
In October 2009, April and October 2010, attempts to collect adult mosquitoes were undertaken at sites randomly selected within eight beef cattle ranches comprising a large area of approximately 1,500 km2 in the Nhecolândia sub-region of Pantanal, west-central Brazil (18°18′–19°15′S, 57°05′–55°24′W) (Figure 1). The collections for this study were authorized by the owners or residents of the sampled properties and also by the Animal Ethics Committee of Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (License CEUA-Fiocruz LW-1/12, protocol P-74/10-5) and the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Natural Resources (licenses IBAMA 18363-1/2009 and 18363-2/2010).
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.g001
Area of study in the Pantanal, State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Mosquito collections
A total of 50 attempts to collect adult mosquitoes were undertaken, but only 39 were positive for mosquitoes. From 11 unsuccessful attempts, five were undertaken in October 2009 and six in October 2010, during the local dry season. Among the 39 positive collections, 12 were undertaken in October 2009, 15 in April 2010 and 12 in October 2010. Seventeen collections were conducted using CDC light traps, six collections using manual aspirators from horses, ten on research team members, three on caimans and three using manual aspirators while landing on walls inside a local residence. Mosquitoes were transported alive to a field laboratory where they were immobilized by cold anesthesia and were identified by species based on morphologic appearance according to taxonomic keys [28], [29]. The mosquitoes were grouped into pools of up to 50 individuals that were sorted with respect to collection method, site of capture, species and gender and then stored in liquid nitrogen.
Virus isolation
Mosquito samples were assayed for viral cytopathic effect (CPE) on C6/36 and plaque formation on Vero cell cultures using standard protocols [30]. Briefly, pools from one up to 50 mosquito specimens were placed in polypropylene capped 2 mL tubes with copper-clad steel beads and 1 mL of BA-1 diluent (1× Medium 199-H, 0.05 M TRIS-HCI, 1% Bovine serum albumin, 4 mM L-Glutamine, 0.35 g/L Sodium bicarbonate, 200 U/mL Penicillin, 200 µg/mL Streptomycin, 2 µg/mL Amphotericin B and 50 µg/mL Gentamycin). A 0.1 mL aliquot of each triturated mosquito pool was inoculated in duplicate onto C6/36 and Vero monolayers prepared in 6-well polystyrene culture plates. The plates were maintained at 28°C and 37°C, respectively, for 1 h with discrete motion every 15 min to optimize virus adsorption. At the end of this period, 3 mL of maintenance media (1× DMEM, Sterile water, 2% Fetal bovine serum, 7.5% Sodium bicarbonate, 1 M HEPES, Non-essentials amino acids, Sodium pyruvate, 200 U/mL Penicillin, 200 µg/mL Streptomycin, 2 µg/mL Amphotericin B and 50 µg/mL Gentamycin) were added to the C6/36 cultures and 3 mL of 0.5% agarose in overlay media with 2× Ye-Lah overlay medium (10× Earle's BBS, Ye-Lah medium, 2% Fetal bovine serum and Sterile distilled water), 7.5% Sodium bicarbonate, 200 U/mL Penicillin, 200 µg/mL Streptomycin, 2 µg/mL Amphotericin B and 50 µg/mL Gentamycin) were added to the Vero cultures, respectively. Plates with C6/36 monolayers were incubated at 28°C in 5% CO2 for 10 days, and observed daily for viral CPE. Plates with Vero monolayers were divided in two groups and then incubated at 37°C at 5% CO2. The first group was incubated for two days and the second group for five days before being stained with neutral red in 3 mL of 0.5% agarose culture media. Both groups were kept at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 10 days, and observed daily for viral plaques.
Real-time RT-PCR
A Sybr green real-time RT-PCR method for the universal detection of flaviviruses was performed to test all mosquito samples for flaviviral nucleic acid. First, RNA was extracted from triturated mosquitoes, and then tested for flavivirus genus-specific viral RNA by real-time RT-PCR using the QiaAmp viral RNA kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The protocol chosen is based on the amplification of a 269–272 nucleotide region at the N terminus of the NS5 gene [31]. Amplicons of samples that presented a melting curve peak above 90 RFU at a temperature above 75°C were considered positive and selected for purification and cDNA sequencing using both forward and reverse primers in separate reactions. DNA amplifications and sequencing reactions were completed on a DNA Engine PTC-200 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and analyzed on an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Byosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were assembled using Lasergene 9 software (DNA STAR, Madison, WI, USA) and subjected to a BLASTn analysis.
Full genome sequencing and phylogenetics
Amplification of total RNA was performed utilizing the SuperScript III one-step RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and universal NS5 specific flavivirus primers (cFD3 and FU1) [32]. An initial fragment of approximately 1,000 base pairs was generated and subjected to GenBank BLAST analysis for identification. Once initial sequencing of the NS5 region indicated high identity with ILHV, primers for full-length sequencing were designed utilizing Primer 3 software in Geneious R6 based on the full-length ILHV sequence in GenBank (NC_009028). Fragments were extracted from an agarose gel with the Qiagen Qiaquick kit and subjected to nucleotide sequencing using BigDye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on a DNA Engine PTC-200 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The products were purified using BigDye Xterminator product (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and then subjected to an ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Byosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing files were aligned and analyzed utilizing Geneious R6 software. The full-length sequence was aligned with homologous flavivirus genomes utilizing MAFFT v7.017 [33], and trees analyzing the full genome sequence as well as the individual NS5 and E genes were generated using maximum-likelihood analyses with a PhyML algorithm in SeaView 4.0 [34] with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Genome sequences of all flaviviruses sequences utilized are listed in GenBank under the following NCBI Reference Sequences: Aedes flavivirus (NC_012932); Kamiti River virus (NC_005064); Cell fusing agent virus (NC_001564); Culex flavivirus (NC_008604); Wesselsbron virus (NC_012735); yellow fever virus (NC_002031); dengue virus 4 (NC_002640); dengue virus 2 (NC_001474); dengue virus 1 (NC_001477); dengue virus 3 (NC_001475); Kedougou virus (NC_012533); Zika virus (NC_012532); Aroa virus (NC_009026); West Nile virus (NC_009942); Japanese encephalitis virus (NC_001437); Murray Valley encephalitis virus (NC_000943); Usutu virus (NC_006551); St. Louis encephalitis virus (NC_007580); Bagaza virus (NC_012534); Ilheus virus (NC_009028); Powassan virus (NC_003687); Alkhurma virus (NC_004355); Langat virus (NC_003690); Omsk hemorrhagic fever virus (NC_005062); tick-borne encephalitis virus (NC_001672); Apoi virus (NC_003676); Modoc virus (NC_003635); Rio Bravo virus (NC_003675).
Results
A total of 3,234 mosquitoes of at least 16 species were collected from five out of the eight ranches where mosquito collection attempts were undertaken (Table 1). Mosquitoes of at least 11 species were identified from human landing collections, 11 from equine landing collections, 11 from CDC light traps, four from caimans and only one indoor.
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.t001
Distribution of mosquitoes captured in the Pantanal, Brazil in 2009 and 2010.
Among the 1,297 specimens caught landing on horses, the most common species was Mansonia pseudotitillans (n = 177; 13,6%). Interestingly, all the specimens were only collected in October 2010, indicating a marked fluctuation of this species in the region. On the other hand, among all different methods of capture used, Uranotaenia lowii, Cx. coronator, Cx. declarator, Cx. chidesteri and Ma. humeralis were only detected in the April collections.
Among the mosquitoes identified to species, Ae. scapularis was the most prevalent with 460 (14.2%) specimens of all mosquitoes captured. Most were caught while attempting to acquire blood from humans (n = 294; 64%) and horses (n = 87; 18.7%) while only 54 (11.7%) were captured on caimans, 26 (5.7%) in CDC light traps, and none indoors, indicating anthropophilic behavior with no evidence for endophily. Ae. scapularis was the most abundant species identified in October 2009 and in April 2010, whereas Cx. quinquefasciatus was the most prevalent species among mosquitoes collected in October, 2010.
Ae. scapularis tested positive for ILHV by culture and for ILHV RNA by real-time RT-PCR, indicating a minimum infection rate of 2.5 per 1,000. Among the 331 specimens of Cx. quinquefasciatus collected in October 2010, 215 (64.9%) were removed from the walls of a local residence, 115 (34.7%) were obtained using CDC light traps and only one (0.3%) specimen was caught while blood-feeding on a horse, confirming its endophilic behavior.
A total of 292 mosquito pools were assayed by cell culture and real-time RT-PCR. One pool of 50 non-engorged female Ae. scapularis demonstrated plaques on Vero cells and CPE in C6/36 cells on the 3rd and 6th day post-inoculation, respectively. A 1,034-bp cDNA amplicon was obtained, and identified as closely related to ILHV. The NCBI file with the highest identity was the Ilheus virus isolate PE163615 (GenBank: EF396950.1) and had an e-value of 0.0, a maximum score of 1688, coverage of 95%, and a maximum identity of 98%.The complete genome (10,759-bp) was sequenced and the alignment with the only full-length genome available in GenBank revealed a 95% similarity to the original strain of ILHV, isolated in Brazil in 1944 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_009028) (Figure 2). Phylogenetic analysis grouped the NS5 and Envelope sequences of our isolate with Ilheus virus isolate FSE800 (GenBank: EF396947.1) (Figure 3) isolated from a human case in Ecuador [11]. A total of 44 nonsynonymous amino acid changes were identified between our isolate and the GenBank Ilheus 1944 isolate. Three nucleotide inserts were identified in the capsid region creating an amino acid shift between amino acid residue number 24 and 37 (nucleotides 166–204) (Figure 4; Table 2). The genome sequence of our isolate of ILHV designated as BrMS-MQ10 was deposited in the publicly accessible database GenBank under accession number KC481679. This strain was isolated from mosquitoes landing on research team members on April 18th, 2010 from 5:35 to 7:00 pm in a natural drying lake near an artificial reservoir. Several additional viruses were detected by mosquito cell culture and/or real-time RT-PCR that did not align with known sequences on GenBank. These viruses will be described separately.
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.g002
Phylogenetic relationships of full genome of ILHV isolate BrMS-MQ10.
Maximum-likelihood tree obtained from full coding sequences using a GTR substitution model. Branches are labeled with bootstrap values that represent the percentage of 1,000 replicates in which the members of a given clade were predicted to relate in the same topography.
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.g003
Phylogenetic relationship of NS5 and Envelope genes.
Neighbor-joining trees obtained from (A) available NS5 sequences and (B) available Envelope sequences. Percentage above the branches represents bootstrap values from 1,000 replicates.
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.g004
Nucleotide insertions in ILHV isolate BrMS-MQ10 as compared to available ILHV sequence.
(A) Alignment between capsid amino acid 24 and 37 (nucleotides 166–204) and (B) the corresponding sequence chromatograph for the same region of BrMS-MQ10.
10.1371/journal.pntd.0002318.t002
Nucleotide and amino acid differences between IHLV 1944 and the field isolate ILHV BrMS-MQ10.
Region
Nucleotide
Amino Acid
ILHV 1944
ILHV BrMS-MQ10
5′ UTR
20
-
-
A (insert)
Capsid
168
25
-
T (insert)
186*
31
-
G (insert)
190*
32
T
C
199*
35
-
T (insert)
205
37
Asp
Ser
208
38
Val
Gly
211
39
Arg
Lys
220
42
Pro
Ile
440
116
Ala
Val
Pre
473
10
Asp
Gly
Env
1391
147
Ile
Thr
2052
367
Lys
Asn
2123
391
Asn
Ser
NS1
3053
200
Phe
Tyr
3061
202
Gln
Glu
3068
205
Thr
Lys
3385
310
Asn
Asp
3438
328
Glu
Asp
3454
333
Val
Met
NS2A
3590
25
Arg
Lys
4124
203
Ala
Val
NS3
5027
147
Thr
Ile
5047
153
Ile
Lys
5049
154
Ile
Lys
5057
157
Glu
Ala
5061
158
Arg
Ser
5255
223
Val
Ala
5366
260
Ala
Val
5371
261
Arg
Cys
6311
575
Val
Asp
6314
576
Arg
Asn
6318
577
Gly
Asn
6321
578
Asp
Glu
6324
579
Pro
Val
6328
580
Val
Ile
NS4A
6646
68
Thr
Ala
NS4B
6947
20
Ser
Thr
6970
27
Thr
Ala
6978
30
Gln
His
NS5
9330
559
Asp
Glu
9509
619
Ala
Val
9790
712
Gly
Ser
10162
836
Trp
Gly
10180
842
Ile
Leu
10310
886
Cys
Tyr
3′UTR
10383
-
C
A
10504
-
T
C
10552
-
-
C (insert)
10562
-
C
T
10645
-
G
T
10731
-
A
T
10754
-
T
-
Falls in a region where inserts have offset the alignment (see figure 4).
Discussion
In the present work we confirm ILHV activity in the Nhecolândia sub-region of Pantanal, through the isolation of ILHV from a pool of Ae. scapularis, which was the most prevalent mosquito species identified, and one that has transmitted ILHV efficiently in laboratory vector competence studies [35]. The anthropophilic behavior, relatively high prevalence, and susceptibility to infection (minimum infection rate observed 2.5 per 1,000) implicate Ae. scapularis as a suspect vector of medical importance for ILHV in the Brazilian Pantanal. This species is known for its gonotrophic discordance, a trait that amplifies its importance as a vector [36].
The isolated strain, BrMS-MQ10 had 44 nonsynonymous mutations identified as compared to the only other ILHV full genome sequence available in GenBank. Interestingly, there were three individual nucleotide insertions identified between codon 24 and 37 of the capsid region. The capsid protein is known to form secondary structures that likely indicate the protein interacts with itself during nucleocapsid assembly [37]. Similarly, capsid has been implicating with modulating cellular pathways as well as plays a role in cis-acting interactions with other regions of the viral genome [38], [39]. Being only the isolate of ILHV with a full genome sequence record, the importance of these changes in the capsid region are as yet undefined. Future studies should strive to characterize the differences between the two known isolates and determine the significance of insertions in that region of the capsid.
Much remains undiscovered regarding mosquito populations in the Pantanal region. Four mosquito species, including Ma. pseudotitillans, Anopheles argyritarsis, Cx. coronator and Ur. lowii, are herein reported for the first time in the Nhecolândia sub-region. The abundance of several mosquito species differed greatly compared with a study conducted in the same region in 2007 [25]. This marked fluctuation of local mosquito populations was probably due to variations in annual rainfall and may influence arbovirus transmission dynamics in the region.
Little is known about human health conditions in the Brazilian Pantanal [40]. The previously reported high prevalence of neutralizing antibodies for ILHV in horses [20] combined with our isolation of ILHV in local mosquitoes confirm the activity of an arbovirus of potential medical importance in the region. The isolation of ILHV infection in mosquitoes while attempting to blood feed on a human warrants further investigation of this virus by the Brazilian arbovirus surveillance program and local physicians.
We thank the ranch workers João Fernandes, Ramon Muniz Almada, Marcelo Martins Dias, Marcio da Silva, Vandir Dias da Silva, Oziel Alex da Silva, Luis Ferreira de Arruda, Leandro Correa Ferreira and João Marcelino de Arruda. We thank Thierry Tomich, Marcia Furlan, Marcos Tadeu and all staff from Embrapa Pantanal as well as the ranch owners for granting access for mosquito collections. We thank Kristy Burkalther, Jason Velez, Janae Stovall and Karen Burroughs from CDC provided laboratory assistance. In the memory of Hermann G. Schatzmayr.
ReferencesKoprowskiH, HughesTP (1946) The virus of Ilhéus encephalitis; physical properties, pathogenicity and cultivation. 54(4): 371–385.LaemmertHWJr, HughesTP (1947) The virus of Ilhéus encephalitis; isolation, serological specificity and transmission. 55(1): 61–67.King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ (2012) Virus Taxonomy: Ninth report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press. 1327 p.CauseyOR, CauseyCE, MarojaOM, MacedoDG (1961) The isolation of arthropod-borne viruses, including members of two hitherto undescribed serological groups, in the Amazon region of Brazil. 10: 227–249.Pinheiro FP, Travassos da Rosa APA, Freitas RB, Travassos da Rosa JFS, Vasconcelos PFC, et al.. (1986) Arboviroses: aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos. In: Instituto Evandro Chagas, 50 anos de contribuição às ciências biológicas e à medicina tropical. vol 1. Belém: Fundação SESP. pp. 375–408.SpenceL, AndersonCR, DownsWG (1962) Isolation of Ilheus virus from human beings in Trinidad, West Indies. 56: 504–509.SrihongseS, JohnsonCM (1967) The isolation of Ilhéus virus from man in Panamá. 16(4): 516–518.Prías-LandínezE, Bernal-CubidesC, Morales-AlarcónA (1968) Isolation of Ilhéus virus from man in Colombia. 17(1): 112–114.PanonG, FauranP, DigoutteJP (1979) Isolation of Ilheus virus in French Guyana. 72(4): 315–318.NassarES, CoimbraTLM, RoccoIM, PereiraLE, RoccoIM, et al. (1997) Human disease caused by an arbovirus closely related to Ilheus virus: Report of five cases. 40: 247–252.JohnsonBW, CruzC, FelicesV, EspinozaWR, ManockSR, et al. (2007) Ilheus virus isolate from a human, Ecuador. 13(6): 956–958.VenegasEA, AguilarPV, CruzC, GuevaraC, KochelTJ, et al. (2012) Ilheus virus infection in human, Bolivia. 18(3): 516–518.RodanicheE, GalindoP (1957) Isolation of Ilhéus virus from Sabethes chloropterus captured in Guatemala in 1956. 6: 686–687.RodanicheE, GalindoP (1961) Isolation of the virus of Ilhéus encephalitis from mosquitoes captured in Panamá. 10: 393–394.Vasconcelos PFC, Travassos da Rosa APA, Pinheiro FP, Shope RE, Travassos da Rosa JFS, et al.. (1998) Arboviruses pathogenic for man in Brazil. In: Travassos da Rosa APA, Vasconcelos PFC, Travassos da Rosa JFS. An overview of arbovirology in Brazil and neighbouring countries. Belém: Instituto Evandro Chagas. pp. 72–99.TurellMJ, O'guinnML, JonesJW, SardelisMR, DohmDJ, et al. (2005) Isolation of viruses from mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae) collected in the Amazon basin region of Peru. 42(5): 891–898.Karabatsos N (1985) International catalogue of arboviruses including certain other viruses of vertebrates. 3 ed. San Antonio: American Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene. 1147 p.PereiraLE, SuzukiA, CoimbraTLM, SouzaRP, ChameletEL, et al. (2001) Arbovírus Ilheus em aves silvestres (Sporophila caerulescens e Molothrus bonariensis). 35(2): 119–123.IverssonLB, SilvaRAMS, Travassos da RosaAPA, BarrosVLRS (1993) Circulation of eastern equine encephalitis, western equine encephalitis, ilheus, maguari and tacaiuma viruses in equines of the Brazilian Pantanal, South America. 35(4): 355–359.Pauvolid-CorrêaA, MoralesMA, LevisS, FigueiredoLT, Couto-LimaD, et al. (2011) Neutralising antibodies for West Nile virus in horses from Brazilian Pantanal. 106(4): 467–474.SilvaJV, AbdonMM (1998) Delimitação do Pantanal brasileiro e suas sub-regiões. 33: 1703–1711.AlmeidaTI, Calijuri MdoC, FalcoPB, CasaliSP, KupriyanovaE, et al. (2011) Biogeochemical processes and the diversity of Nhecolândia lakes, Brazil. 83(2): 391–407.IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2010) Censo 2010. Available: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/ Accessed 6 July 2012.AlencarJ, LorosaES, SilvaJS, LopesCM, GuimarãesAE (2005) Observações sobre padrões alimentares de mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) no Pantanal Mato-Grossense. 34: 681–687.Pauvolid-CorrêaA, TavaresFN, AlencarJ, Silva J dosS, MurtaM, et al. (2010) Preliminary investigation of Culicidae species in South Pantanal, Brazil and their potential importance in arbovirus transmission. 52(1): 17–24.Pauvolid-CorrêaA, TavaresFN, CostaEV, BurlandyFM, MurtaM, et al. (2010) Serologic evidence of the recent circulation of Saint Louis encephalitis virus and high prevalence of equine encephalitis viruses in horses in the Nhecolândia sub-region in South Pantanal, Central-West Brazil. 105: 829–833.MelandriV, GuimarãesAÉ, KomarN, NogueiraML, MondiniA, et al. (2012) Serological detection of West Nile virus in horses and chicken from Pantanal, Brazil. 107(8): 1073–1075.Lane J (1953) Neotropical Culicidae. São Paulo: Editora Universidade de São Paulo 1112 p.Consoli RAGB, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R (1994) Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz. 228 p.Beaty BJ, Calisher CH, Shope RE (1995) Arboviruses. In: Lennette EH, Lennette DA, Lennette ET. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections. 7 ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Association. pp. 189–212.MoureauG, TemmamS, GonzalezJP, CharrelRN, GrardG, et al. (2007) A real-time RT-PCR method for the universal detection and identification of flaviviruses. 7(4): 467–477.KunoG, ChangGJ, TsuchiyaKR, KarabatsosN, CroppCB (1998) Phylogeny of the genus Flavivirus. 72: 73–83.KatohK, MisawaK, KumaKI, MiyataT (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. 30: 3059–3066.GouyM, GuindonS, GascuelO (2010) SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. 27: 221–224.AitkenTHG, AndersonCR (1959) Virus transmission studies with Trinidadian mosquitoes II. Further observations. 8: 41–45.de DeusJT, KakitaniI (2006) Parity of Ochlerotatus scapularis in laboratory and field conditions. 40(3): 505–512.McLauchlanJ (2000) Properties of the hepatitis C virus core protein: a structural protein that modulates cellular processes. 7(1): 2–14.TellinghuisenTL, RiceCM (2002) Interaction between hepatitis C virus proteins and host cell factors. Nature. 5(4): 419–427.LiuZY, LiXF, JiangT, DengYQ, ZhaoH, et al. (2013) A novel cis-acting element within the capsid-coding region enhances flavivirus vRNA replication by regulating genome cyclization. 87(12): 6804–18.CunhaRV, Atanaka-SantosM (2011) Research priorities in epidemiology in the Brazilian Pantanal. 27(6): 1050–1051.