Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Improving Men’s Participation in Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV as a Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Priority in South Africa

  • Wessel van den Berg ,

    wessel@genderjustice.org.za

    Affiliation Sonke Gender Justice, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Kirsty Brittain,

    Affiliation School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Gareth Mercer,

    Affiliations School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, Vaccine Evaluation Centre, Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada

  • Dean Peacock,

    Affiliation Sonke Gender Justice, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Kathryn Stinson,

    Affiliations School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Médecins Sans Frontières, Khayelitsha, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Hanna Janson,

    Affiliation Sonke Gender Justice, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Vuyiseka Dubula

    Affiliation Sonke Gender Justice, Cape Town, South Africa

Improving Men’s Participation in Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV as a Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Priority in South Africa

  • Wessel van den Berg, 
  • Kirsty Brittain, 
  • Gareth Mercer, 
  • Dean Peacock, 
  • Kathryn Stinson, 
  • Hanna Janson, 
  • Vuyiseka Dubula
PLOS
x

Correction

11 May 2015: van den Berg W, Brittain K, Mercer G, Peacock D, Stinson K, et al. (2015) Correction: Improving Men’s Participation in Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV as a Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Priority in South Africa. PLOS Medicine 12(5): e1001836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001836 View correction

Summary Points

  • Involving male partners in programmes to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV may improve programme coverage and infant outcomes.
  • Rates of male partner involvement remain low worldwide, and detailed guidelines to increase involvement are lacking in South Africa.
  • We recommend that South African national and provincial guidelines and policies for preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission be adjusted to explicitly include a focus on increasing male partner involvement and that they include concrete descriptions of how to achieve this.
  • We propose recommendations for improving male partner involvement at a policy, facility, and community level.
  • Challenges to improving male partner involvement include the nature of relationships and family structures in South Africa and the capacity of health systems to implement recommendations.

Introduction

The World Health Organization promotes a four-component strategy for preventing mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV: prevent new infections in women; prevent unintended pregnancies among women living with HIV infection; prevent transmission of HIV from mothers to their children during pregnancy and breastfeeding; and identify, treat, and support women living with HIV, their children, and their families [1].

Historically, PMTCT services have been directed primarily at women. Ignoring men’s influence on reproductive health has probably limited both the reach and the effectiveness of these services. Strategies to increase male partner involvement (MPI) in PMTCT programmes are aimed at improving programme results and allowing programmes to reach more clients [2]. Recruiting men as supportive partners in PMTCT can improve the health of women and children, better engage men in their own health, improve the communication of couples, and increase the participation of fathers in child health through increased proximity to the health system and to the child. For these reasons, MPI has been advanced as a priority intervention in PMTCT programmes.

Evidence for Benefits of Men’s Participation in Preventing Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV

Studies in sub-Saharan African countries have found that cultural and gender norms give men more power than women in sexual decision-making, including in regards to abstaining, having concurrent sexual partners, and using condoms [3,4]. Such norms may prevent women from accessing family planning and sexual health services unless their partners are also engaged [5]. For HIV-infected mothers, disclosing their HIV status to their partners and being supported in their infant-feeding choices may promote successful exclusive breastfeeding [6,7]. In addition, fear of rejection and violence from partners may be a barrier to HIV testing and returning to the health care facility for test results and antiretroviral drugs [8,9].

Interventions to promote MPI in PMTCT have often involved providing antenatal HIV testing and counselling for couples. Routine HIV testing and early initiation of treatment are highly effective HIV transmission prevention strategies [10]. Targeting couples is promising because it can prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV, as well as transmission within serodiscordant couples in which the infected partner’s status is unknown. Counselling can improve couples’ communication about HIV, fertility-related decision-making, and gender equality [11].

To date, there have been few rigorous evaluations of PMTCT-based couples counselling and testing interventions, but findings have generally been positive. In sub-Saharan African studies, it was found that women whose partners attended counselling were more likely to accept HIV testing and to adhere to antiretroviral prophylaxis and infant feeding recommendations [1215]. Women’s disclosure of their HIV status to a male partner has been found to significantly improve antiretroviral adherence during pregnancy in Tanzania [16] and Nigeria [17]. In addition, MPI in PMTCT was shown to decrease infant HIV infection and increase HIV-free survival in a study conducted in Kenya [18]. In the context of PMTCT in South Africa, disclosure and MPI have similarly been shown to improve antiretroviral adherence during pregnancy [19].

The Policy Dimension of Male Partner Involvement in PMTCT in South Africa

Despite the promise shown in local and international studies, rates of male partner attendance at antenatal care (ANC) visits and participation in couples HIV testing remain low worldwide [20].

The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS) Global Plan argues for the support and involvement of men in PMTCT programmes [21]. Some countries in Africa show commitment to MPI in PMTCT but lack specific guidelines. A recent review of health-related policies of 12 countries [22] in Africa assessed whether the policies contain language on engaging men and boys in areas critical for gender equality. All of the countries noted that men play an important role in PMTCT. Six of the countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, and Zimbabwe) were vague in detailing what such male involvement would include. They failed, for example, to mention the care-giving roles men can, or should, play in the lives of their children or to provide detailed plans on how men can provide support to their partners.

In the six remaining countries (Kenya, Namibia, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia), the PMTCT policies contained proactive and progressive language. For example, national policies in Tanzania draw attention to the lack of MPI in PMTCT and include detailed strategies for how to engage men. These strategies include developing “male-friendly” spaces in order to encourage men to attend ANC services, aiming for “50% of male partners of women tested for HIV through PMTCT to be screened and counselled for HIV,” and advocating for a change in societal norms. One strategy document outlines potential strategies to address the fact that “the ANC services are not currently organised in a way that encourages joint attendance by both parents” [23].

Male-partner testing rates in southern Africa are well below 50%, and few men attend sexual and reproductive health services with their partners [24]. In a recent study in Cape Town, no men accompanied their partners to antenatal care at the enrolment of mothers in the programme, although 35% did so after the intervention [25]. A study in rural South Africa showed that one man accessed HIV testing services for every three women tested [26].

Reasons for men’s current disengagement from maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) services are complex and longstanding but amenable to change. Important barriers include the persistence of traditional gender norms that discourage men from attending health services (for example, the perception that reproductive health is a “woman’s affair”) and health policies that have focused on women as the only agents for improving maternal and child health and reducing vertical HIV transmission. While these policies have been successful in many ways, they have inadvertently reinforced the exclusion of men and, by extension, couples [20,24,2729].

The South African National Strategic Plan on HIV, STIs and TB (NSP) mentions the need to strengthen PMTCT programmes by involving and engaging with men [30]. For example, it commits to “engaging women and men, and ensuring that PMTCT is integrated into sexual and reproductive health and fertility management services,” and to strengthening PMTCT services, including through “the engagement of fathers” [31]. However, the importance of engaging with men receives no further attention in the NSP, and there is no discussion concerning how to encourage men to become more involved in PMTCT.

The language of the National Action Framework (NAF) for “No Child Born with HIV by 2015 & Improving the Health and Wellbeing of Mothers, Partners and Babies in South Africa” is more promising. One of the focus areas put forward is the meaningful inclusion and engagement of males in PMTCT services using a family-centered approach. Furthermore, the framework includes an objective of raising awareness and increasing utilisation of services through targeted efforts to reach men and male leaders [30]. It states that strategies should include addressing MPI in training programmes for health care providers in PMTCT, dissemination of materials to enhance male participation, and working with male leaders and role models in the community to advocate for male participation [30]. However, the NAF does not put forward comprehensive recommendations on how to achieve these aims.

The 2010 South African national PMTCT guidelines are even more sparse in their guidance for achieving MPI. One stated aim of the guidelines is to involve women’s partners and families in PMTCT services, yet the words “men,” “man,” “male,” “father,” “parent,” “fatherhood,” and “dad” are conspicuously absent [32]. The same is true for the Province of the Western Cape Department of Health 2013 PMTCT clinical guidelines [33].

Despite the above-mentioned barriers, many studies have demonstrated that it is possible to increase men’s knowledge of sexual and reproductive health, improve MPI in PMTCT, challenge negative attitudes, and increase positive behaviours [34,35]. When given the opportunity, many men wish to be positively involved in reproductive health decision-making, including decisions about the use of services, to contribute to positive health outcomes for themselves and for their families [34,35].

We propose that South African PMTCT services could be enhanced by capitalising on such evidence and acting to reinforce men’s interest in, and shared responsibility for, MNCH outcomes.

Proposed Policy Adjustment

We recommend that South African National and Provincial PMTCT guidelines and policies include concrete descriptions of how to achieve and measure the following three goals for male partner involvement:

  1. Ensure that men are engaged as supportive partners in MNCH. A promising approach for achieving this goal is to routinely provide couples with HIV counselling and testing as part of ANC services [36]. Couples HIV testing and counselling should be viewed as a starting point for establishing long-running engagement of men in MNCH services.
    Men’s participation in ANC services could be encouraged by using written invitations [25], offering expanded weekday or weekend clinic hours, or delivering these services directly in clients’ homes [37]. HIV self-testing appears to be a reliable and acceptable strategy for increasing the convenience and reducing the cost of home-based HIV testing [38]. Antenatal counselling sessions should be used as an opportunity to educate men to recognise and help address the mother’s antenatal and postnatal health needs. By establishing a welcoming atmosphere, providers delivering ANC services could also encourage men to attend postnatal visits and engage them in infant health promotion. Male partner support for infant feeding choices can contribute to successful PMTCT through exclusive breastfeeding practices [6,7]—for example, male partners can share in the feeding work by using expressed milk, thereby relieving the mother of the feeding burden.
  2. Expand MNCH service provision to link more effectively to the specific health needs of male clients. At the facility level, MNCH or ANC staff ought to be engaged as agents in transforming facilities into gender-sensitive spaces, where women and men are welcomed as clients. Staff members thus need to be trained on the distinct health needs of women and men and on appropriate referral pathways. Male-specific health needs may include, for example, medical male circumcision and management of erectile dysfunction. Staff members need to be equipped to recognise and sensitively discuss with clients how gender-inequitable beliefs and behaviours adversely affect health. Stationery used in health facilities could be modified to collect information pertinent to MPI, like marriage and cohabitation status and history of intimate partner violence.
    Attendance of men and couples at services will, however, place additional demands on providers. If national plans and guidelines are as detailed as possible and include realistic costs, facility administrators will be better supported to ensure appropriate staff allocation, monitoring, and remuneration. While MPI in MNCH service provision may carry extra costs, it could ultimately save money. For example, improved retention of women in ANC services would reduce the need for time-intensive tracing and follow-up.
  3. Encourage men to challenge harmful gender-inequitable beliefs and behaviours. The ability to attend ANC sessions depends on a variety of factors [39], and even men who do not attend ANC sessions have been reported to be involved in pregnancy in a range of different ways, such as providing both emotional and instrumental support to their partners [40]. Developing interventions to improve MPI in a range of pregnancy- and infant-related activities, rather than solely focussing on male attendance at ANC sessions, may thus be beneficial.
    MPI interventions that have been successful in many parts of Africa are those that shift the burden of requesting male participation from women to the health system itself [41]. The barriers preventing men’s involvement can partially be addressed by changes in the system, but coimplementation with community-based interventions is likely to be more effective. Interventions such as the “One Man Can” campaign focus on shifting harmful gender norms and have been shown to increase men’s uptake of HIV counselling and testing [42].
    Therefore, we recommend that health departments and facilities partner with civil society organisations to deliver complementary community engagement efforts. These efforts ought to educate men about MNCH services and transform community-wide gender norms that discourage men from accessing health services. Developing the perception of antenatal couples HIV counselling and testing as a routine service may minimise men’s concerns that attending antenatal clinics is stigmatising and “unmanly” [20]. Interventions involving peer education, social marketing, and endorsements by influential community members may be effective in causing men and women to question and contest rigid inequitable gender norms, or, at least, to disregard them [34]. In relation to MNCH, overturning the attitude that reproductive health is a woman’s responsibility could improve men’s participation in MNCH services. Improving workplace norms to make it easier for men to attend clinics during working hours could be achieved by introducing paternity leave for both pre- and postdelivery support of mothers.

Challenges That Lie Ahead

Challenges have been identified in delivering clinic-based couples HIV counselling and testing in isolation of other strategies and will need to be addressed in the recommended policy adjustment. Possibly the most significant challenge is that participation rates of male partners in couples counselling and testing interventions have been very low [1115]. Low uptake is unsurprising given the institutional and social barriers to men’s attendance of MNCH services and implies that simply expanding services to include men may generate only modest improvements in their engagement.

The capacity of health systems to comply with policy documents and national plans also presents a major challenge. Although national and provincial documents that include progressive language and details like how specific tasks ought to be allocated between health professionals will be an important step forward, effective financial cost calculation, implementation, and monitoring will also be essential. Harmful gender norms are present in communities but are similarly prevalent amongst health system staff, including health managers, thereby presenting the need to shift gender norms within the system as a necessary step to enhancing capacity.

The nature of relationships between women and their partners has an important influence on the nature and extent of MPI [20]. Nonmarried or non-cohabiting partnership status acts as a barrier to women disclosing their HIV status to their partners [43], while it is reported that cohabiting and being in a stable relationship facilitates MPI [44,45]. In this article, the words “couple” and “partner” have been used to refer to biological parents who have conceived a child together. These terms may imply a marriage or stable affiliation-based relationship. The reality in South Africa is, however, much more complex. The majority of children do not live with their biological father—the proportion of children whose fathers were absent and living increased between 1996 and 2009 from 42% to 48% [46]. The success of MPI interventions may thus hinge on engaging effectively with the varied nature of partnerships between coparents. Men who have fathered a child and are no longer involved, or are “absent fathers,” have admitted that poverty prohibits them from being involved, since they identify the role of father with the role of being a financial provider [47]. A potential solution may be to use community-based interventions to shift norms around provision from focusing solely on financial provision to include care giving.

Conclusions

Improving guidelines is an important step to improving MPI, as is effective implementation and monitoring of these guidelines. We have attempted to give an overview of some of the promising evidence and strategies. The nature of relationships and family structures in South Africa and the capacity of health systems present significant challenges and would require innovative solutions to engaging men effectively. The same harmful gender norms that prevent men from participating in couples testing or antenatal care keep men from looking after their own health needs. Engaging men in sexual and reproductive health and MNCH services may be difficult but cannot be ignored in order to harness the benefits for the health needs of mothers, infants, and fathers.

Author Contributions

Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: WvdB KB GM. Wrote the paper: WvdB KB GM DP KS HJ VD. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: WvdB KB GM DP KS HJ VD. All authors have read, and confirm that they meet, ICMJE criteria for authorship.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization. PMTCT strategic vision 2010–2015: Preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV to reach the UNGASS and Millennium Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  2. 2. Betancourt TS, Abrams EJ, McBain R, Smith Fawzi MC. Family-centred approaches to the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2010;13(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-S2-S2. pmid:20573284
  3. 3. Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men's influences on women's reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(7):1379–1395. pmid:15246168
  4. 4. Kacanek D, Dennis A, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Montgomery ET, Morar N, Mtetwa S, et al. A qualitative study of obstacles to diaphragm and condom use in an HIV prevention trial in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS Educ Prev. 2012;24(1):54–67. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.1.54. pmid:22339145
  5. 5. Clouse K, Schwartz S, Van Rie A, Bassett J, Yende N, Pettifor A. “What they wanted was to give birth; nothing else”: Barriers to retention in Option B+ HIV care among postpartum women in South Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;67(1):e12–e18 doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000263. pmid:24977376
  6. 6. Doherty T, Chopra M, Nkonki L, Jackson D, Persson LA. A longitudinal qualitative study of infant-feeding decision making and practices among HIV-positive women in South Africa. J Nutr. 2006;136(9):2421–2426. pmid:16920864
  7. 7. Ijumba P, Doherty T, Jackson D, Tomlinson M, Sanders D, Persson LÅ, et al. Social circumstances that drive early introduction of formula milk: An exploratory qualitative study in a peri-urban South African community. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(1):102–111. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12012. pmid:23230962
  8. 8. Maman S, Groves A, King E, Pierce M, Wyckoff S. HIV testing during pregnancy: A literature and policy review. New York: Open Society Institute; 2008.
  9. 9. Chinkonde JR, Sundby J, Martinson F. The prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission programme in Lilongwe, Malawi: Why do so many women drop out. Reprod Health Matters. 2009;17(33):143–151. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)33440-0. pmid:19523591
  10. 10. Curran K, Baeten JM, Coates TJ, Kurth A, Mugo NR, Celum C, et al. HIV-1 prevention for HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9:160–170. doi: 10.1007/s11904-012-0114-z. pmid:22415473
  11. 11. Kunene B, Beksinska M, Zondi S, Mthembu N, Mullick S. Involving men in maternity care: South Africa. FRONTIERS Final Report. New York: Population Council; 2004.
  12. 12. Msuya SE, Mbizvo EM, Hussain A, Uriyo J, Sam NE, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. Low male partner participation in antenatal HIV counselling and testing in northern Tanzania: Implications for preventive programs. AIDS Care. 2008;20(6):700–709. doi: 10.1080/09540120701687059. pmid:18576172
  13. 13. Farquhar C, Kiarie JN, Richardson BA, Kabura MN, John FN, Nduati RW, et al. Antenatal couple counseling increases uptake of interventions to prevent HIV-1 transmission. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37(5):1620–1626. pmid:15577420
  14. 14. Semrau K, Kuhn L, Vwalika C, Kasonde P, Sinkala M, Kankasa C, et al. Women in couples antenatal HIV counseling and testing are not more likely to report adverse social events. AIDS. 2005;19(6):603–609. pmid:15802979
  15. 15. Becker S, Mlay R, Schwandt HM, Lyamuya E. Comparing couples' and individual voluntary counseling and testing for HIV at antenatal clinics in Tanzania: A randomized trial. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(3):558–566. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9607-1. pmid:19763813
  16. 16. Kirsten I, Sewangi J, Kunz A, Dugange F, Ziske J, Jordan-Harder B, et al. Adherence to combination prophylaxis for prevention of mother-to-child-transmission of HIV in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(6):e21020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021020. pmid:21695214
  17. 17. Ekama SO, Herbertson EC, Addeh EJ, Gab-Okafor CV, Onwujekwe DI, Tayo F, et al. Pattern and determinants of antiretroviral drug adherence among Nigerian pregnant women. J Pregnancy. 2012;851810.
  18. 18. Aluisio A, Richardson BA, Bosire R, John-Stewart G, Mbori-Ngacha D, Farquhar C, et al. Male antenatal attendance and HIV testing are associated with decreased infant HIV infection and increased HIV free survival. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(1):76–82. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181fdb4c4. pmid:21084999
  19. 19. Peltzer K, Sikwane E, Majaja M. Factors associated with short-course antiretroviral prophylaxis (dual therapy) adherence for PMTCT in Nkangala district, South Africa. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:1253–1257. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02253.x. pmid:21366691
  20. 20. World Health Organization. Male involvement in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  21. 21. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Countdown to zero: Global plan towards the elimination of new HIV infections among children by 2015 and keeping their mothers alive 2011–2015. Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2011.
  22. 22. Sonke Gender Justice, MenEngage Africa. MenEngage Africa policy reports; 2014. http://www.genderjustice.org.za/policy-development-advocacy/sonke-and-menengage-africa-policy-advocacy-tools/. Accessed 20 August 2014.
  23. 23. Tanzania Commission for AIDS. The second national multi-sectoral strategic framework on HIV and AIDS (2008–2012). Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Commission for AIDS; 2007.
  24. 24. Koo K, Makin JD, Forsyth BWC. Barriers to male-partner participation in programs to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission in South Africa. AIDS Educ Prev. 2013;25(1):14–24. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.1.14. pmid:23387948
  25. 25. Mohlala BK, Boily MC, Gregson S. The forgotten half of the equation: Randomized controlled trial of a male invitation to attend couple voluntary counselling and testing. AIDS. 2011;25(12):1535–1541. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328348fb85. pmid:21610487
  26. 26. Snow RC, Madalane M, Poulsen M. Are men testing? Sex differentials in HIV testing in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. AIDS Care. 2010;22(9):1060–1065. doi: 10.1080/09540120903193641. pmid:20824559
  27. 27. Ditlopo P, Mullick S, Askew I, Vernon R, Maroga E, Sibeko S, et al. Testing the effectiveness of the Men as Partners program (MAP) in Soweto, South Africa. Washington, DC: USAID; 2007.
  28. 28. Ramirez-Ferrero E, Lusti-Narasimhan M. The role of men as partners and fathers in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and in the promotion of sexual and reproductive health. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39S):103–109.
  29. 29. Mullick S, Kunene B, Wanjiru M. Involving men in maternity care: Health service delivery issues. Agenda Special Focus. 2005:124–135.
  30. 30. National Department of Health. National action framework for ‘no child born with HIV by 2015 & improving the health and wellbeing of mothers, partners and babies in South Africa’. Pretoria: National Department of Health; 2011.
  31. 31. South African National AIDS Council. National strategic plan on HIV, STIs and TB: 2012–2016. Pretoria: South African National AIDS Council; 2011.
  32. 32. National Department of Health & South African National AIDS Council. Clinical guidelines: PMTCT (prevention of mother-to-child transmission). Pretoria: National Department of Health; 2010.
  33. 33. Western Cape Department of Health. PMTCT clinical guidelines update: May 2013. Cape Town: Western Cape Department of Health; 2013.
  34. 34. Ghanotakis E, Peacock D, Wilcher R. The importance of addressing gender inequality in efforts to end vertical transmission of HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15(Suppl 2):17385. doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.4.17385. pmid:22789642
  35. 35. Barker G, Ricardo C, Nascimento M. Engaging men and boys in changing gender-based inequity in health: Evidence from programme interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  36. 36. Sherr L, Croome N. Involving fathers in prevention of mother to child transmission initiatives − what the evidence suggests. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15(Suppl 2):17378. doi: 10.7448/IAS.15.4.17378. pmid:22789641
  37. 37. Osoti AO, John-Stewart G, Kiarie J, Richardson B, Kinuthia J, Krakowiak D, et al. Home visits during pregnancy enhance male partner HIV counselling and testing in Kenya: A randomized clinical trial. AIDS. 2014;28(1):95–103. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000023. pmid:23942059
  38. 38. Choko AT, Desmond N, Webb EL, Chavula K, Napierala-Mavedzenge S, Gaydos CA, et al. The uptake and accuracy of oral kits for HIV self-testing in high HIV prevalence setting: A cross-sectional feasibility study in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Med. 2011;8(10):e1001102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001102. pmid:21990966
  39. 39. Montgomery E, van der Straten A, Torjesen K. “Male involvement” in women and children’s HIV prevention: Challenges in definition and interpretation. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57(5):e114–e116. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31821d33d6. pmid:21860358
  40. 40. Maman S, Moodley D, Groves AK. Defining male support during and after pregnancy from the perspective of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women in Durban, South Africa. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;56(4):325–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00029.x. pmid:21733102
  41. 41. Dunlap J, Foderingham N, Bussell S, Wester CW, Audet CM, Aliyu MH, et al. Male involvement for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission: A brief review of initiatives in East, West, and Central Africa. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014;11(2):109–118. doi: 10.1007/s11904-014-0200-5. pmid:24633806
  42. 42. Dworkin SL, Hatcher AM, Colvin C, Peacock D. Impact of a gender-transformative HIV and antiviolence program on gender ideologies and masculinities in two rural, South African communities. Men Masc. 2013;16(2):181–202.
  43. 43. Crankshaw TL, Voce A, King RL, Giddy J, Sheon NM, Butler LM. Double disclosure bind: Complexities of communicating an HIV diagnosis in the context of unintended pregnancy in Durban, South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(Suppl 1):S53–S59. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0521-1. pmid:23722975
  44. 44. Ditekemena J, Koole O, Engmann C, Matendo R, Tshefu A, Ryder R, et al. Determinants of male involvement in maternal and child health services in sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Reprod Health. 2012;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-32. pmid:23171709
  45. 45. Morfaw F, Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Rodrigues C, Wunderlich AP, Nana P, et al. Male involvement in prevention programs of mother to child transmission of HIV: A systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Syst Rev. 2013;2:5. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-5. pmid:23320454
  46. 46. Holborn L, Eddy G. First steps to healing the South African family. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations; 2011.
  47. 47. Eddy MM, Thomson-de Boor H, Karabo M. “So we are ATM fathers”: A study of absent fathers in Johannesburg, South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre for Social Development in Africa, Sonke Gender Justice; 2013.