Complement Factor H Gene Abnormalities in Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome: From Point Mutations to Hybrid Gene

Complement Factor H Gene Abnormalities in Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome: From Point Mutations to Hybrid Gene

  • Marina Noris, 
  • Giuseppe Remuzzi
  • Published: October 31, 2006
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030432

A typical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease involving haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure. There is growing evidence that the disease is associated with defective control of the alternative pathway of complement [1].

Genetic abnormalities in complement regulatory proteins, including complement factor H (CFH), membrane cofactor protein, and complement factor I, have been reported in 30%, 10%, and 5% of patients with aHUS, respectively [2–4]. CFH is a plasma protein produced by the liver that acts as a central regulator in the alternative pathway of complement activation. CFH acts as a cofactor for complement factor I in the inactivation of the central complement protein C3b to form iC3b. CFH also accelerates the decay of the C3 convertase C3bBb of the alternative pathway, and competes with factor B for binding to C3b [5].

The CFH Gene and CFH Protein

The gene encoding CFH is situated, together with genes for five factor H-related proteins (CFHL1–5), within the regulator of complement activation (RCA) gene cluster at chromosome position 1q32 [6,7]. In 1998 a linkage was established between the RCA gene cluster at 1q32 and the disease [8]. In this region there are several large genome duplications, also known as low copy repeats (LCRs), resulting in a high degree of sequence identity between CFH and the five CFHL genes. By sequence analysis a heterozygous mutation in CFH was found in affected patients and obligate carriers within one family, providing the first evidence that CFH genetic abnormalities played a role in aHUS [8].

The secreted protein product of CFH consists of 20 repetitive units, named short consensus repeats (SCRs), each composed of 60 amino acids [5]. Around 70 CFH mutations have been reported in patients with aHUS (listed in, The Factor H-Associated HUS

There is growing evidence that the disease is associated with defective control of the alternative pathway of complement.

Mutation Database). Most of these mutations are heterozygous missense mutations that cluster in the exons encoding SCRs 19 and 20. Functional studies on the mutant proteins have shown reduced C3b and heparin binding [1] that results in impaired control of complement activation on the endothelial cell surface. These mutations include two nucleotide changes, c.3572C>T and c.3590T>C, that in some patients occur in combination. As the exon encoding CFH SCR20 differs from the exon encoding CFHL1 SCR5 only at the c.3572 and c.3590 nucleotides [9], the combined mutation makes CFH SCR20 identical to CFHL1 SCR5, a phenomeon known as gene conversion.

A New Study Showing a Hybrid Complement Gene

Theoretically, LCRs such as those seen in the RCA cluster not only predispose to gene conversion events but are also associated with genomic rearrangements [10], which usually result from nonallelic homologous recombination (i.e., a recombination among different domains and exons with high homology that can generate new gene structures) between LCRs. There is already evidence that a nonallelic recombination between CFHL1 and CFH that results in the deletion of CFHL1 occurs as a common polymorphism in the general population. In a new study in PLoS Medicine, Goodship and colleagues [11] tested the intriguing hypothesis that a particular nonallelic recombination may occur in patients with aHUS that leads to the formation of a hybrid CFH/CFHL1 gene [11].

To test their hypothesis, the authors studied a large pedigree comprising eight patients over four generations who developed severe forms of aHUS. Although linkage analysis had shown evidence of disease segregation with the RCA cluster [8], a mutation search in two candidate genes, CFH and MCP, within this region failed to show evidence of any mutation. Now the authors provide strong evidence that the affected and obligate carriers within this family carry a heterozygous hybrid gene that derived from a crossing-over between intron 21 of CFH and intron 4 of CFHL1. The hybrid gene consists of the first 21 exons of CFH (encoding SCRs 1–18 of CFH) and the last two exons of CFHL1 (encoding SCR4 and 5 of CFHL1). The protein product of the hybrid gene is identical to the CFH mutant protein S1191L/V1197A, which arises by gene conversion (i.e., the aforementioned c.3572C>T and c.3590T>C) and lacks surface complement regulatory activity.

These results provide a new mechanism leading to CFH abnormalities in aHUS and show the complexity of genetic screening of CFH family genes. Since the hybrid gene cannot be picked up by genomic screening, which uses CFH-specific primers, theoretically some patients that apparently have normal results on CFH screening may instead carry a hybrid gene. Based on this hypothesis the authors suggest [11] performing CFH screening by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in all patients with aHUS. Their position is strengthened by finding the hybrid gene in three additional unrelated patients with aHUS, indicating that the abnormality is not restricted to a single pedigree. However, larger studies in other independent patient cohorts should be performed to establish the frequency of such an abnormality within the aHUS population.

Clinical Implications

Identification of the specific genetic defect in patients with aHUS could enhance diagnostic precision, predict clinical outcomes, and, hopefully, translate into improved management of the disease. As CFH is a plasma protein produced mainly by the liver, kidney transplantation in patients with aHUS with CFH mutations who have progressed to end-stage renal disease is associated with 80% of graft loss due to disease recurrence [12]. Patients with aHUS should therefore be screened for any possible CFH abnormality before inclusion on a transplant list to avoid exposing the patient to an unacceptable risk of disease recurrence. On the other hand, patients with CFH abnormalities will benefit from ongoing efforts to obtain specific replacement therapies with plasma fractions enriched in CFH.

Next Steps

Nowadays, screening for gene mutations is being performed at several clinical and research centres in industrialized countries. However multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, which is required to identify the hybrid gene, is a very specialized procedure and few centres may be equipped to perform it. Thus further work is needed to identify and validate an easier test to reliably identify the CFH/CFHL hybrid gene. Whether other recombination events could occur in aHUS, generating different CFH/CFHL hybrid genes, should also be investigated.


  1. 1. Noris M, Remuzzi G (2005) Hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1035–1050.
  2. 2. Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S, Pianetti G, Castelletti F, et al. (2006) Genetics of HUS: The impact of MCP, CFH and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment and outcome. Blood 108: 1267–1279.
  3. 3. Richards A, Buddles MR, Donne RL, Kaplan BS, Kirk E, et al. (2001) Factor H mutations in haemolytic uremic syndrome cluster in exons 18–20, a domain important for host cell recognition. Am J Hum Genet 68: 485–490.
  4. 4. Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Moulton EA, Kavanagh D, Dragon-Durey MA, Blouin J, et al. (2006) Genetic and functional analyses of membrane cofactor protein (CD46) mutations in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 2017–2025.
  5. 5. Zipfel PF, Jokiranta TS, Hellwage J, Koistinen V, Meri S (1999) The factor H protein family. Immunopharmacology 42: 53–60.
  6. 6. Diaz-Guillen MA, Rodriguez de Cordoba S, Heine-Suner D (1999) A radiation hybrid map of complement factor H and factor H-related genes. Immunogenetics 49: 549–552.
  7. 7. Male DA, Ormsby RJ, Ranganathan S, Giannakis E, Gordon C, et al. (2000) Complement factor H: Sequence analysis of 221 kb of human genomic DNA containing the entire fH, fHR-1 and fHR-3 genes. Mol Immunol 37: 41–52.
  8. 8. Warwicker P, Goodship THJ, Donne RL, Pirson Y, Nicholls A, et al. (1998) Genetic studies into inherited and sporadic haemolytic uremic syndrome. Kidney Int 53: 836–844.
  9. 9. Heinen S, Sanchez-Corral P, Jackson MS, Strain L, Goodship JA, et al. (2006) De novo gene conversion in the RCA cluster (1q32) causes mutations in complement factor H associated with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat 27: 292–293.
  10. 10. Lupsky JR, Stankiewicz P (2005) Genomic disorders: Molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genet 1: e49.
  11. 11. Venables JP, Strain L, Routledge D, Bourn D, Powell HM, et al. (2006) Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with a hybrid complement gene. PLoS Med 3: e431. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030431.
  12. 12. Bresin E, Daina E, Noris M, Castelleti F, Stefanov R, et al. (2006) Outcome of renal transplantation in patients with non-shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: Prognostic significance of genetic background. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 88–99.