Reader Comments

Post a new comment on this article


Posted by plosmedicine on 31 Mar 2009 at 00:32 GMT

Author: Nisha Doshi
Position: Publications Assistant
Institution: PLoS Medicine
Submitted Date: November 25, 2008
Published Date: November 25, 2008
This comment was originally posted as a “Reader Response” on the publication date indicated above. All Reader Responses are now available as comments.

Please note that there are a few corrections to the results section that we've been made aware of since the full manuscript was accepted for publication.

On page 5 of the PDF, under the heading “Discrepancies in Primary Outcome Reporting,” the “155/179” outcomes that were also found in the NDAs should read “138/179.” On page 7, under the heading “Discrepancies in Conclusions,”"35 of 36" including unknowns should read "34 of 36."

A formal correction is forthcoming.

No competing interests declared.