• Loading metrics

Psip1/p52 regulates posterior Hoxa genes through activation of lncRNA Hottip

Psip1/p52 regulates posterior Hoxa genes through activation of lncRNA Hottip

  • Madapura M. Pradeepa, 
  • Fionnuala McKenna, 
  • Gillian C. A. Taylor, 
  • Hemant Bengani, 
  • Graeme R. Grimes, 
  • Andrew J. Wood, 
  • Shipra Bhatia, 
  • Wendy A. Bickmore


Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been implicated in various biological functions including the regulation of gene expression, however, the functionality of lncRNAs is not clearly understood and conflicting conclusions have often been reached when comparing different methods to investigate them. Moreover, little is known about the upstream regulation of lncRNAs. Here we show that the short isoform (p52) of a transcriptional co-activator—PC4 and SF2 interacting protein (Psip1), which is known to be involved in linking transcription to RNA processing, specifically regulates the expression of the lncRNA Hottip–located at the 5’ end of the Hoxa locus. Using both knockdown and knockout approaches we show that Hottip expression is required for activation of the 5’ Hoxa genes (Hoxa13 and Hoxa10/11) and for retaining Mll1 at the 5’ end of Hoxa. Moreover, we demonstrate that artificially inducing Hottip expression is sufficient to activate the 5’ Hoxa genes and that Hottip RNA binds to the 5’ end of Hoxa. By engineering premature transcription termination, we show that it is the Hottip lncRNA molecule itself, not just Hottip transcription that is required to maintains active expression of posterior Hox genes. Our data show a direct role for a lncRNA molecule in regulating the expression of developmentally-regulated mRNA genes in cis.

Author summary

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been implicated in various biological functions including regulation of gene expression. However, the mechanism through which they regulate gene expression is not clearly understood. Here we show that a transcriptional co activator—Psip1 specifically regulates the expression of the lncRNA Hottip. Moreover, using multiple approaches, including lncRNA depletion, genetic manipulation of Hottip locus, transcriptional activation and premature termination of lncRNA transcript along with RNA localization, we demonstrate that Hottip lncRNA regulates expression of neighbouring Hoxa genes.


The mammalian genome encodes ~10,000 long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs)[1]. Although very few of these molecules have been functionally characterised, a small number have been shown to function by binding to various protein complexes to regulate gene expression[26]. Some lncRNAs have been reported to affect gene expression in trans[7,8], whereas others, such as Kcnq1ot1, Xact, Xist and Tsix, function in cis (reviewed in[9]). Other lncRNAs likely function in the cytoplasm through binding to other regulatory RNAs, e.g. miRNAs[10].

It has also been difficult to distinguish whether lncRNA function is conferred by the process of transcription or by the RNA molecule itself. Concerns have been raised with respect to limitations and discrepancies in various methodologies used to study lncRNA function[1113]. Contrasting conclusions have often been reached when comparing knockdown and knockout studies of lncRNA loci—e.g. HOTAIR, MALAT1 and Halr [1417].

With the exception of relatively well characterized lncRNAs like Xist[18], H19[19,20] and Kcnq1ot1[21,22], many recently described lncRNAs lack genetic evidence to support their function in vivo. Indeed, recent efforts to phenotype mouse knockouts for 18 lncRNA genes identified only 5 with strong phenotypes[23]. With the list of lncRNA loci with unknown function increasing, there is a pressing need to rigorously dissect the functional mechanisms of individual lncRNA loci. Additionally, most research has focused on the downstream functions of lncRNAs and, with the exception of lncRNAs involved in imprinting and dosage compensation, little is known about the transcriptional regulation of lncRNAs themselves. Compared to lncRNA sequences, the promoters of lncRNA genes are conserved, and are enriched for homeobox domain containing transcription factor binding sites[24], which suggests lncRNA expression is a regulated process.

Mammalian Hox loci are important model systems for the investigation of lncRNA functions. Expression of many noncoding RNAs within Hox clusters is tissue specific[2529], and have been linked to the regulation of Hox mRNA genes [7,14,30,31]. At the Hoxa cluster, the lncHoxa1/Halr—also known as Haunt is located ~ 50 kb away from 3' end of HOXA (Fig 1A) and has been shown to repress HOXA1 expression in cis[32]. Importantly, a recent study demonstrated that Haunt lncRNA plays a distinct role as a repressor while its DNA sequence functions as an enhancer for HOXA genes[15]. HOTAIRM, located between HOXA1 and HOXA2, is expressed antisense to coding HOXA genes, and is implicated in retinoic acid induced activation of HOXA1 and HOXA4 during myeloid differentiation[33]. HOTTIP lncRNA is transcribed in an antisense direction from the 5' end of HOXA13 (Fig 1A), and is reported to be important for targeting MLL through interaction with WDR5 to maintain posterior (5') HOXA expression in distal tissues[3].

Fig 1. Reduced Hottip expression and Mll occupancy in Psip1–/–.

(A) Mean Log2 ChIP/input for Psip1/p75, Mll1, Menin and H3K4me3 in WT and Psip1–/–MEFs over Hoxa clusters from custom tiling arrays[35]. Annotated noncoding transcripts (grey, top) and Hox gene transcripts (black) are shown below. (n = 2 biological replicates). Genome co-ordinates are from the mm9 assembly of the mouse genome. Direction of transcription for Hoxa13 and Hottip genes are indicated with arrow below. (B) Mean (± s.e.m) expression, assayed by RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh, of Hoxa13 and Hottip in WT and Psip1–/–MEFs, (n = 3 biological replicates). (C) Nimblegen tiling microarray data showing log2 ratio of Psip1–/–/ WT run-on transcribed RNA (nascent RNA) over posterior Hoxa genes n = 2 technical replicates.

PC4 and SF2 interacting protein (Psip1), also known as LEDGF, has been suggested to play an important role in regulation of Hox genes[34]. We have recently demonstrated the role of the p75 isoform of Psip1 (Psip1/p75) in recruiting an Mll complex to expressed Hox genes[35]. The alternatively spliced short isoform of Psip1 (Psip1/p52) lacks the C-terminal Mll or integrase binding domain (IBD), but shares the chromatin binding PWWP and AT hook like domains at the N-terminus. Psip1/p52 binds to H3K36 trimethylated (H3K36me3) nucleosomes via the PWWP domain and can modulate alternative splicing by recruiting splicing factors to H3K36me3[36].

Here, we show that Psip1/p52, but not Psip1/p75 regulates the expression of the lncRNA Hottip, which is located at the 5’ end of the Hoxa locus and transcribed in an antisense direction away from Hoxa13. We show that the Hottip RNA binds to, and is required for, activation of genes at the 5’ end of Hoxa establishing a firm role for a lncRNA molecule in the regulation of gene expression in cis. This also adds a new role for Psip1/p52 in RNA-based processes.


Psip1 is required for expression of lncRNA Hottip

In mammals, the active state of Hox genes is maintained by Compass-like complexes containing the MLL (Mix lineage leukemia) histone H3K4 methyltransferases. Hox repression is maintained by Polycomb (PcG) complexes[37]. We recently demonstrated that the transcriptional co-activator Psip1/p75 and Mll co-occupy expressed Hox genes, and that loss of Psip1 leads to reduced Mll1 (and Mll2) occupancy at active Hox genes[35]. Most strikingly, at the extreme 5' end of Hoxa, where the Hottip lncRNA is located[3], Mll binding is completely lost in Psip–/–MEFs compared to wild type (WT) (Fig 1A). Reduced Mll1 is accompanied by concurrent loss of H3K4me3 and Menin—a common component of Mll1 and Mll2 Compass-like complexes[38]. We noted that absence of Psip1 results in complete loss of expression of the lncRNA Hottip and reduced expression of Hoxa13, which is located adjacent to Hottip at the 5’ end of Hoxa and which has previously been described as one of the target genes of Hottip (Fig 1B)[3]. In contrast, other Hottip target genes–Hoxa9, a10, and a11[3] are up-regulated in Psip1–/–MEFs despite the loss of Hottip expression (Fig 1C)[35]. Nascent run-on transcription analysis shows that these effects occur at the level of transcription (Fig 1C). Together with the binding of Psip1 to the expressed 5’ part of Hoxa (Fig 1A), these results suggest that Psip1 might function as a transcriptional coactivator to regulate expression of the Hottip lncRNA.

Depletion of Psip1/p52 and Hottip leads to reduced expression of 5’ Hoxa genes

Stable rescue of Psip–/–MEFs with the p52 isoform of Psip1 led to an increase in expression of posterior Hoxa genes (Fig 2A) suggesting a role for the short Psip1 isoform in this regulation. To confirm this finding in a different cell type we analysed Psip1-mediated Hoxa expression in a limb bud mesenchymal cell line (14fp) which retains the distal limb-specific expression pattern of posterior or 5' Hox genes[39]. Psip1 is expressed at high levels in the distal limb buds of mouse embryos, where Hottip and 5’ Hoxa genes are also highly expressed (S1A Fig)[3]. Moreover, Hoxa13 expression is required for patterning of the distal limb [40].

Fig 2. Psip1/p52 and Hottip are important for expression of 5’ Hoxa genes.

(A) Agilent expression microarray data showing Log2 fold change in expression of Hoxa genes in Psip1–/–MEFs upon rescue with Psip1/p52 (p52 rescue / Psip1–/–MEFs) (n = 4 biological replicates) * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01. (B) Log2 mean (± s.e.m) relative expression, assayed by RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh, of Hoxa genes, along with Psip1/p52, Psip1/p75, and total Hottip (exon 2) transcript, in limb cells transduced with shRNAs targeting p52 (red bars, p52 sh1) p75 (green bars, p75 sh1) and Hottip (black bars, Hottip sh1) relative to cells transduced with a mammalian non-targeting sh RNA (control) (n = 3 biological replicates). * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01. (C) Immunoblotting of limb cells after shRNA knockdown of p52 and p75 Psip1 isoforms with Psip1 antibody (A300-847a) which recognizes both p52 and p75[36]. β-actin served as loading control. Two different sets of shRNAs (sh1 in (a) and sh2 in S1 Fig) were used for knockdown along with a mammalian non-targeting shRNA as control (control_sh). Knockdown of p52, p75 and Hottip using independent lentiviral shRNAs (sh2) confirms that mis-regulation of Hox genes is not due to off-target effect of shRNAs (S1B Fig). (D) Mean log2 expression of Hottip, in limb cells transduced with sh RNAs targeting p52 (red bars, p52 sh1) and those cells rescued transiently with shRNA resistant p52 cDNA (green bars, p52 sh1 p52res). Fold change in expression was normalized to Gapdh, relative to mammalian non-targeting shRNA (control) (n = 3 biological replicates). (E) Mean Log2 ChIP/input across Hoxa cluster for Mll1 from limb cells transduced with control shRNA (Control_Sh), shRNA targeting p52 (p52 sh1) and Hottip (Hottip sh1) as described in (B) & (C). Genome co-ordinates are from the mm9 assembly of the mouse genome.

To identify which isoform of Psip1 regulates Hottip in the limb bud cell line we knocked down Hottip and also the two separate isoforms of Psip1 using two independent sets of lentiviral shRNAs each specifically targeting the 3' UTR of Psip1/p52, the C-terminus of Psip1/p75 and Hottip RNA. Knockdown efficiency was confirmed by RT-qPCR analysis (Fig 2B and S1B Fig) and by immunoblotting for Psip1 isoforms (Fig 2C). Knockdown of Psip1/p75 had no significant affect on Hottip or Hoxa genes in these cells. However, specific knockdown of Psip1/p52 led to down- regulation of 5’ Hoxa genes—Hoxa13, a11 and a10, with Hoxa13 expression being the most strongly abrogated (Fig 2B). Knockdown of p52 also strongly downregulated Hottip expression (Fig 2B and 2D) and this was rescued by expression of a shRNA-resistant p52 cDNA (Fig 2D). Knockdown of Hottip had an almost identical affect on 5’ Hoxa expression as p52 knockdown (Fig 2B) and is consistent with the reported effects of HOTTIP knockdown in human foreskin fibroblasts[3]. These data suggest that it is the p52 isoform of Psip1, not p75, that specifically activates Hottip lncRNA transcription. Moreover, these data support an earlier report that the Hottip lncRNA is involved in maintaining the active chromatin domain at 5’ Hoxa genes[3].

We found a significant reduction in total Hottip RNA levels in the p52 knockdown cells (Fig 2B), which shows that reduced Hottip RNA levels are not simply due to the known effect of Psip1/p52 on RNA splicing[36].

Mll1 occupancy over Hoxa cluster is altered upon p52 & Hottip knockdown

It has been suggested that Hottip has a role in maintaining an MLL complex through interaction with the WDR5 component[3]. Consistent with this, ChIP showed that Mll1 occupancy was significantly reduced across posterior Hoxa genes in limb bud cells upon knockdown of p52 or Hottip compared to control knockdown (Fig 2E), Intriguingly, whilst Mll1 was completely lost from Hoxa13 upon depletion of p52 and Hottip (Fig 2E), it was gained at 3' Hoxa genes (Hoxa1a6), concomitant with the increase in expression of these 3' Hoxa genes upon p52 or Hottip depletion (Fig 2B). This redistribution of Mll is consistent with the redistribution of H3K4me3 and Menin across Hoxa and Hottip loci in Psip1–/–MEFs (Fig 1A), although the causal mechanism is not known.

Deletion of Hottip leads to reduced expression of posterior Hoxa genes

Most lncRNA depletion studies are done by si/sh RNA mediated knockdown, but the conclusions reached have often been different from those after genetic deletion of the loci encoding the lncRNAs[1416]. We therefore used two pairs of guide RNAs with Cas9 nickase (Cas9n) to delete the gene body of Hottip (HottipΔ) in limb mesenchymal cells, leaving the Hottip promoter intact (Fig 3A). qRT-PCR of Hoxa genes showed a significant reduction in expression of Hoxa13, a11 and a10 in homozygous HottipΔ cells (Fig 3B). Consistent with Psip1 and Hottip knock down studies (Fig 2B), expression of 3' Hoxa genes, such Hoxa2, a6 and a7 increased in HottipΔ compared to WT cells. It is possible that effects on 3’ Hoxa genes are due to cross-regulation of Hox genes by Hox transcription factors [41].

Fig 3. Hottip localizes to 5′ Hoxa genes and deletion of Hottip reduces 5′ Hoxa expression.

(A) Schematics showing the mouse Hoxa13 and Hottip loci. The CpG Island (CGI) at the Hoxa13 promoter is shown in a grey bar. Genome co-ordinates are from the mm9 assembly of the mouse genome. Guide RNA binding sites for deletion of Hottip are shown as arrow heads, primers used for genotyping are shown in arrows (p1 to p4). The deletion product of Hottip (HottipΔ) is shown below. Agarose gel image showing genotyping PCR, first two lanes are amplicons of primers (p1 and p2) within the deleted Hottip region, second two lanes are for amplicons from primers (p3 and p4) 3’ of deleted region. (B) Mean (± s.e.m) expression, assayed by RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh, of Hoxa genes and Hottip, in wild-type (black bars, WT), and Hottip knock out (gray bars, HottipΔ) limb mesenchymal cells, (n = 3 biological replicates). * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01. (C) RT-qPCR showing mean (± s.e.m) ± percentage (%) enrichment over input for Hottip, 7SK and Gapdh RNAs from Hottip ChIRP pulldown from two experiments. (D) qPCR showing mean (± s.e.m) percentage (%) enrichment over input of ChIRPed DNA at promoters of Actb, Hoxa1, Hoxa7, Hoxa9, Hoxa10, Hoxa11, and Hoxa13 from Hottip ChIRP experiments in wild type (black bars, WT) and Hottip knock out limb mesenchymal cells (grey bars, HottipΔ).

Hottip RNA is localized at posterior Hoxa genes

To find the direct genomic targets of Hottip lncRNA in limb cells, we performed chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP)[42] using 11 biotinylated antisense oligo pools covering the entire length of Hottip. qRT-PCR analysis of ChIRPed RNA showed specific enrichment for Hottip RNA (Fig 3C). qPCR analysis of Hottip ChIRPed DNA showed specific enrichment of Hottip RNA over the promoters of Hoxa13, and a11 in WT cells. Analysis in HottipΔ cells confirmed the specificity of the Hottip ChIRP (Fig 3D). Hottip RNA was undetectable across more 3' Hoxa genes (a9, a7, a1), demonstrating that misregulation of 3' Hoxa genes in the absence of Hottip (Figs 2B and 3B) is a secondary event, which does not involve direct binding of Hottip.

Induction of Hottip lncRNA is sufficient to activate posterior Hoxa genes

It is possible that reduced expression of posterior Hox genes in HottipΔ cells is due to loss of cis -regulatory elements located within the deleted region, rather than loss of the Hottip RNA per se. Hottip is known to function at the site of its synthesis (in cis) and it fails to activate target genes when expressed ectopically from a retroviral construct [3]. Therefore, we synthetically activated endogenous Hottip in ES cells where Hottip and Hox gene clusters are repressed by polycomb complexes, to study the effect of lncRNA activation in cis or trans. We have previously shown that targeted recruitment of an ectopic activator (Vp16) to silent loci in murine ES cells (mESCs) can overcome this repression[43]. Unlike human HOTTIP which is transcribed bi-directionally from the HOXA13 CpG island promoter (Fig 4A)[3], the mouse Hottip promoter is ~2 kb away from the TSS of Hoxa13 which allowed us to recruit dcas9-Vp160 (Vp16 x10)[4447] specifically to the promoters of either Hottip or Hoxa13 (Fig 4A). CRISPR dCas9 mediated transcriptional activation has been shown to be ineffective when guides are targeted >1kb from TSS[44] suggesting that we should be able to direct activation specifically to Hottip or Hoxa13 using this approach.

Fig 4. Artificial induction of Hottip is sufficient to activate 5’ Hoxa genes.

(A) Schematics showing UCSC genomic coordinates of Hottip, Hoxa13, CpG Islands (CGI) in the mouse (top, mm9) and human (bottom, hg19) genomes. Schematics of guide RNA mediated recruitment of dCas9-VP160 to the Hottip or Hoxa13 promoters is also shown. Direction of transcription is indicated as arrow marks. (B) Heat map showing the log2 mean fold change in expression of Hoxa, Hoxd and pluripotency associated genes (control genes) from expression microarray experiment, upon co-transfection of guide RNAs recognizing the Hottip promoter (Hottip gRNAs + dcas9-VP160). dCas9-VP160 was also co transfected with guide-RNAs recognizing Hoxa13 promoter (Hoxa13 gRNAs + dcas9-VP160) (n = 3 or 4 biological replicates). (C) Similar to (B) RT-qPCR data showing mean (± s.e.m) log2 fold change in expression of Hottip, Hoxa13, a11, a10, a9, a7, a1, Pou5f1 and Hoxb9 upon guide RNA mediated recruitment of dCas9-VP160 to the Hottip promoter (A) in mouse ES cells. Data were normalized to those from a dcas9 control (n = 3 biological replicates). (D) Similar to (C) mean log2 fold change in Hottip and Hoxa13 expression in wild type ES cells co-transfected with guide-RNAs recognizing the Hottip promoter and dCas9-VP160 (Black bars, WT). Hoxa13 expression in Hottip knock out limb mesenchymal cells is also shown (grey bar, HottipΔ). * p < 0.05, ** p <0.01 throughout.

Agilent expression microarray and RT-qPCR analysis showed specific up-regulation of posterior (a13, a11 and a10), but not anterior Hoxa and Hoxd genes upon dcas9-VP160 mediated Hottip activation in mESCs, relative to transfection with dCas9 recruitment alone (no VP160) (Fig 4B and 4C). In contrast, specific recruitment of dCas9-VP160 to the Hoxa13 promoter led to up regulation of only Hoxa13, while expression of other Hoxa genes was unaltered (Fig 4B). Furthermore, recruitment of dCas9-VP160 to either Hox13 or Hottip did not perturb the pluripotency network (Fig 4B) suggesting that the undifferentiated phenotype of the mESCs was not disrupted. Finally, recruitment of dCas9-VP160 to the Hottip promoter in HottipΔ 14fp cells led to only a modest upregulation of Hoxa13 compared to WT cells (Fig 4D), pointing to the importance of full length Hottip RNA transcription in the regulation of Hoxa genes.

Hottip RNA is indispensable for 5’ Hoxa expression

To distinguish the requirement for the Hottip lncRNA molecule from the act of lncRNA transcription at the Hottip locus, for up-regulation of 5’ Hoxa genes, we used CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homologous recombination to insert a 49 bp synthetic polyadenylation (polyA) cassette[48] 47 bp downstream of the Hottip transcription start site (TSS) in 14fp cells (Fig 5A and 5B). Insertion of this polyA cassette should cause early cleavage of the nascent lncRNA transcript while preserving the promoter, and cis elements within the Hottip genomic locus. RT-qPCR analysis in three independent knockin lines and two wild-type (WT) clones demonstrated that spliced Hottip RNA was strongly reduced in all three polyA knockin lines (pA1, pA2 and pA3) compared to WT (Fig 5C). Importantly Hoxa13 and a11 mRNA levels were significantly reduced in all three pA lines compared to WT.

Fig 5. Hottip RNA is indispensable for 5’ Hoxa expression.

(A) Schematics showing UCSC genomic coordinates of Hottip and Hoxa13 in the mouse (mm9) genomes. Schematics of CRISPR mediated insertion of 49 bp synthetic polyA signal to ~47 bp downstream of Hottip transcription start site (TSS) is also shown (yellow). Primers used for genotyping and Sanger sequencing are shown in grey arrows, primers used for RT-qPCR are shown as RT-Fp and RT-Rp. (B) Genotyping PCR from the DNA isolated from the wild type (WT1, WT2) and polyA knock-in (pA1, pA2, and pA3) 14fp lines. (C) RT-qPCR data showing mean (± s.e.m of three technical replicates) fold change in expression of Hottip, Hoxa13, a11, a10, a9 and a7 in wild type (WT) and three polyA knock-in 14fp lines. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. (D) Working model summarising the results from various experiments. Wild type cells with normal level of posterior Hoxa expression and occupancy of Hottip RNA at Hox genes (i). In Psip1–/–MEFs the expression levels of Hottip, posterior Hoxa genes and bound Mll levels are reduced (ii). Knockdown of Psip1/p52 or Hottip reduced expression of posterior Hoxa genes with corresponding reduction of Mll levels at these sites (iii). Deletion of Hottip leads to similar effect as depletion of Hottip by shRNAs (iV). Artificial activation of Hottip in mESCs leads to increased expression of target Hoxa genes (V). Premature termination of Hottip transcript leads to reduced expression of target Hoxa genes (Vi). The effects of each approach in changing the DNA element, lncRNA and the process of transcription are indicated (right).

To verify this effect in vivo, we also injected Cas9 and guideRNAs into single cell zygotes to generate mouse embryos with a premature polyA signal inserted at Hottip (S1C Fig). Consistent with the results in the 14fp cell line, RT-qPCR analysis of polyA knockin 12.5 dpc embryo showed reduced expression of Hottip, Hoxa13 and Hoxa11 but not Hoxc13 –a posterior Hox gene from different chromosome (S1C Fig). This suggests that it is the full length Hottip RNA itself that is involved in Hoxa13/a11 regulation.


Our findings are compatible with a model in which Hottip lncRNA regulates posterior Hoxa gene transcription in cis (Fig 5D)—likely through an Mll complex. We have previously shown that the longer p75 isoform of Psip1 binds directly to Mll through its MLL or integrase binding domain (IBD) and recruits Mll to active Hox clusters[35]. Here we have demonstrated that the shorter isoform Psip1/p52 –which lacks the C-terminal Mll1 binding domain of p75—controls posterior Hoxa genes by activating the expression of Hottip lncRNA, a mechanism quite distinct from p75. We show that the Hottip lncRNA itself is required to maintain active expression of 5’ Hoxa genes, possibly by maintaining a stable Mll1 complex at the 5’ end of Hoxa gene cluster. The mechanism through which Hottip RNA specifically localizes to 5’ Hoxa genes in cis is not clear and needs further investigation.

By inserting a polyadenylation cassette at the 5’ end of Hottip, we show the importance of Hottip RNA for Hoxa13 expression in both cell lines and in vivo in mouse embryogenesis. Similarly, Hottip is upregulated in several cancers where its expression also correlates with increased Hoxa13 [4951]. Recently, two micro RNAs miR-192, miR-204 have been demonstrated to post-transcriptionally silence the HOTTIP lncRNA, leading to the reduced viability of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells[52], further validating a role for this lncRNA molecule. Further studies are needed to understand whether human HOTTIP/HOXA13 are regulated by PSIP1, and the role of PSIP1 and HOTTIP in oncogenesis.

Noncoding transcription at enhancer elements has been associated with enhancer activity[53,54]. However, most enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) are degraded by exosomes, suggesting that at distal regulatory elements the act of transcription itself could be sufficient for the enhancer activity [5557]. An enhancer -like function of lncRNAs has been demonstrated in some cases including HOTTIP[3,58]. However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that the function of many lncRNA genes in regulating genes in cis does not require the lncRNA molecule itself. Instead their effect is mediated by enhancer-like activity of underlying DNA elements in the lncRNA locus, the act of transcription and/or splicing of lncRNAs[5962].

The recent controversies in the lncRNA field demand thorough investigations to distinguish the role of lncRNA molecules from enhancer- like function of the DNA elements which encode them, and from the process of transcription and splicing of these loci. Our studies presented here show how these facets of lncRNA regulation and function can be dissected at one well-studied lncRNA locus. With the ever increasing number of lncRNAs annotated in genomes using high-throughput sequencing technologies, the list of these transcripts with unknown mechanisms of upstream transcriptional regulation and downstream functional mechanism is growing and there will be the need to develop more high-throughput methods for the rigorous testing of lncRNA function and mechanism of action.


Ethics statement

Cervical dislocation was used as a euthanasia method and all mouse experiments were performed under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986' and were approved by the University of Edinburgh ethical committee (TR-38-16) and performed under UK Home Office license number PPL 60/4418.

Cell lines

Psip1–/–and its corresponding WT MEFs[35,63] were a kind gift from Prof. Alan Engelman (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, USA). Limb mesenchymal cells (14fp) isolated from the posterior mesenchyme of E11.5 mouse embryos from an Immortomouse (H-2kb-tsA58) × CD1 cross, are as previously described[39] and were a gift from Robert Hill (MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh). mES cells (E14) were cultured as previously described[64]. Psip1/p52 rescue experiment in Psip–/–MEFs is previously described[35].

shRNA knockdown

Lentiviral shRNAs (pLKO.1 vectors) targeting Psip1/p52, Psip1/p75 and Hottip (S1 Table) were transduced as described by the manufacturer (Sigma Aldrich). Expression of p52 was rescued by transiently transfecting a shRNA-resistant p52 cDNA[35].


Reverse transcription followed by quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed as described previously[35]. Briefly, RNA was treated with Turbo DNA Free kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and cDNA was prepared using superscript II reverse transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific) using random primers. All qPCRs were performed with three biological or technical replicates in a LightCyler 480 (LC480, Roche) or CFX96 (Biorad), and the data was normalized to Gapdh. Details of the oligos are given in the S2 Table.

Whole mount RNA in situ on mouse embryos

RNA in situ hybridization for mHottip in 10.5 dpc mouse embryos were performed as previously described[65]. Details of oligos used to PCR amplify the Hottip cDNA including T7 (sense) and T3 (Antisense) promoter sequences are given in S3 Table.

ChIP, antibodies and data analysis

ChIP was performed as described previously[35], using antibodies for Mll1 (Active Motif 61295, 61296), ChIP DNA was hybridized to a custom Hox array and data was normalized as described previously[35].

Chromatin Isolation by RNA Purification (ChIRP)

Anti-sense oligo probes tiling the mouse Hottip RNA were designed using the web tool from Stellaris FISH Probe Designer ( Biosearch Technologies, CA, USA). Eleven biotinylated oligos were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich (S6 Table). ChIRP was performed in limb mesenchymal cells as described previously[42]. RNA was isolated from 20% of the ChIRPed beads and used for RT-qPCR for Hottip, 7sk and Gapdh specific primers and rest of the sample was used to purify DNA and perform qPCR for Hoxa genes. Primer details are given in S2 Table.

CRISPR mediated deletion of Hottip

Guide RNAs were designed using the Zhang laboratory web tool ( Paired guide RNAs (gRNAs) (S4 Table) were designed to target the murine Hottip genomic locus ~50bp beyond the TSS and before the transcription end site (Fig 3A). gRNAs were cloned into the D10A nickase mutant version of cas9 (cas9n) containing pSpCas9n(BB)-2A-GFP (PX461)[66]. A pool of four gRNA containing plasmids were transfected into mouse limb-bud mesenchymal cells (14fp) using FuGENE HD transfection reagent and FACS sorted 48 hours after transfection for GFP+ cells. Homozygous deletion of Hottip was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing, primers used are given in S2 Table.

dCas9-mediated activation of Hottip and Hoxa13 in ES cells

Five guide RNA plasmid pools targeting the promoters of Hottip and Hoxa13 (S5 Table) were designed as above and cloned into pSLQ1371[56,67]. These gRNA plasmids encoding mCherry and puromycin resistance were co-transfected with a plasmid encoding dCas9-VP160 (pAC94-pmax-dCas9VP160-2A-puro, Addgene plasmid number 48226) [47]. 24hrs after transfection, transfected mES cells were selected by addition of 2μg/ml puromycin for another 24 hrs. RNA was extracted 48hrs after transfection, RT-qPCR was performed as described above. Microarray gene expression analysis performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Agilent Technologies). Plasmids containing non-targeting guide RNAs and dCas9 alone (dcas9Δ) served as controls.

dCas9-mediated activation of Hottip in 14fp cells

Wild type and HottipΔ 14fp cells were transfected with Hottip gRNA plasmid pools similar to ES cells and FACS sorted for mCherry positive cells 24 hrs after transfection. Transfected mCherry positive cells were seeded to cell culture flasks to recover for another 24 hrs, 48 hrs after transfection cells were harvested and RNA was isolated using Trizol and RT-qPCR was performed.

CRISPR mediated insertion of polyA sites into Hottip

HottipΔ 5'guide 1 oligos (1 & 2 in S4 Table) were cloned into pSpCas9(BB)-2A-Puro (PX459) V2.0 (a gift from Feng Zhang (Addgene plasmid 62988)), which is designed to insert a synthetic polyA signal sequence into the Hottip genomic locus 47 bp after the TSS (Fig 5A). gRNA containing plasmids were co-transfected along, with a repair template (S7 Table) synthesized as a 199bp single-stranded Ultramer oligo (IDT) bearing the desired sequence change, into limb cells using lipofectamine 2000 transfection reagent. 24 hours after transfection puromycin resistant cells were selected for another 48 hours and plated at 2500 cells/100mm plates. On day 10 colonies were picked and plated in duplicate into 96 well plates. Genomic PCR (Fig 5B) and Sanger sequencing confirmed three polyA knockin (pA) clonal lines with homozygous insertions of the polyA cassette into exon 1 of Hottip. Primers used for genotyping PCR sequencing and RT PCR are given in S2 Table.

CRISPR mediated insertion of polyA sites into Hottip in mouse embryo

To generate mouse embryos with a premature transcriptional termination signal (polyA signal) at the Hottip locus, single cell mouse zygotes were injected with Cas9 mRNA (50ng/ul), gRNA (25ng/ul) and repair template DNA (75ng/ul) (S7 Table). The embryos were later harvested for analysis at 12.5 dpc stage of embryonic development, tail tips were used to genotype the embryos by PCR and Sanger sequencing (S1C and S1D Fig). Total RNA was isolated from a PolyA knockin embryo and two litter mate wild types using Trizol and reverse transcribed using Superscript II and qPCR was performed using iTaq universal SYBR green supermix (Biorad).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Whole mount in situ hybridization and PolyA insertion data from mouse embryos.

(A) Whole mount RNA in situ hybridization of Hottip in 10.5d embryo (right). Image from Psip1 RNA in situ hybridization for 11.5d embryos from Embrys resource (left) (B) Similar to Fig 2B mean (± s.e.m) expression, assayed by RT-qPCR and normalized to Gapdh, of Hoxa genes, along with Psip1/p52, Psip1/p75, and Hottip RNA, in limb cells transduced with independent shRNAs (sh2’s in S1 Table) targeting p52 (red bars, p52 sh2) p75 (green bars, p75 sh2) and Hottip (black bars, Hottip sh2) relative to cells transduced with a mammalian non-targeting sh RNA (Grey bars, control) (n = 3 biological replicates, p value * <0.05, ** <0.01). (C) Similar to Fig 5B, genotyping PCR from the DNA isolated from the wild type (WT1, WT2) and polyA knockin (Hottip pA1) 12.5 dpc embryo. (D) Similar to Fig 5A, illustration showing polyA insertion site within Hottip gene (yellow), Sanger sequencing data confirms 49 bp polyA signal sequence insertion (highlighted in yellow) and flanking Hottip sequence. (E) Similar to Fig 5A and 5C, RT-qPCR data showing mean (± s.e.m of three technical replicates) and normalized to Gapdh, fold change in expression of Hottip, Hoxa13, a11, a10, a9 and Hoxc13 in two wild type (WT1 and WT2) and one polyA knock-in 12.5 dpc whole embryo at Hottip locus.


S2 Table. List of primers used for RT-qPCR, and genotyping PCR.


S3 Table. Oligos used to PCR amplify Hottip cDNA to prepare sense and antisense probes used in whole mount in situ (S1 Fig).


S4 Table. Oligos used to clone guides to pX461.


S5 Table. Forward oligos used to clone guideRNA (gRNA) sequences to pSLQ plasmids, target sequences of the sgRNAs (Fig 4) are shown in red.


S7 Table. PolyA repair template.

Nucleotide sequence of single stranded oligonucleotide used as homology directed repair templated used for insertion of a synthetic polyA signal sequence to hottip locus. 75 base nucleotide homology arms are shaded in grey, 49base polyA signal is shaded in yellow. GuideRNA binding site is in red, PAM site is in blue.



We thank Prof. Alan Engelman (Harvard Medical School) for Psip1−/ MEFs and the Psip1/p52 and Psip1/p75 retroviral rescue plasmids. Dr. Martin Sauvageau (Harvard University) for discussions. We thank Prof. Robert Hill (MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh) for 14fp cells. The mouse transgenic work was carried out in the University of Edinburgh CBS-IGMM transgenic facility.

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: MMP WAB.
  2. Data curation: MMP GRG.
  3. Formal analysis: MMP GRG.
  4. Funding acquisition: MMP WAB.
  5. Investigation: MMP FM.
  6. Methodology: MMP GCAT SB HB AJW.
  7. Project administration: MMP WAB.
  8. Supervision: MMP.
  9. Validation: MMP.
  10. Visualization: MMP WAB.
  11. Writing – original draft: MMP.
  12. Writing – review & editing: MMP WAB.


  1. 1. Derrien T, Johnson R, Bussotti G, Tanzer a, Djebali S, Tilgner H, et al. The GENCODE v7 catalogue of human long non-coding RNAs: Analysis of their structure, evolution and expression. 2012; 1775–1789.
  2. 2. Khalil AM, Guttman M, Huarte M, Garber M, Raj A, Rivea Morales D, et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106: 11667–11672. pmid:19571010
  3. 3. Wang KC, Yang YW, Liu B, Sanyal A, Corces-Zimmerman R, Chen Y, et al. A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature. 2011;472: 120–4. pmid:21423168
  4. 4. Yang L, Froberg JE, Lee JT. Long noncoding RNAs: fresh perspectives into the RNA world. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39: 35–43. pmid:24290031
  5. 5. Zhao J, Sun BK, Erwin JA, Song J-J, Lee JT. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science. 2008;322: 750–6. pmid:18974356
  6. 6. McHugh CA, Chen C-K, Chow A, Surka CF, Tran C, McDonel P, et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature. 2015;521: 232–236. pmid:25915022
  7. 7. Rinn JL, Kertesz M, Wang JK, Squazzo SL, Xu X, Brugmann S a, et al. Functional demarcation of active and silent chromatin domains in human HOX loci by noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2007;129: 1311–23. pmid:17604720
  8. 8. Guttman M, Donaghey J, Carey BW, Garber M, Grenier JK, Munson G, et al. lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation. Nature. 2011;477: 295–300. pmid:21874018
  9. 9. Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2011;43: 904–14. pmid:21925379
  10. 10. Tan JY, Sirey T, Honti F, Graham B, Piovesan A, Merkenschlager M, et al. Extensive microRNA-mediated crosstalk between lncRNAs and mRNAs in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2015; 1–12.
  11. 11. Bassett AR, Akhtar A, Barlow DP, Bird AP, Brockdorff N, Duboule D, et al. Considerations when investigating lncRNA function in vivo. Elife. 2014;3: e03058. pmid:25124674
  12. 12. Selleri L, Bartolomei MS, Bickmore WA, He L, Stubbs L, Reik W, et al. A Hox-Embedded Long Noncoding RNA: Is It All Hot Air? PLOS Genet. 2016;12: e1006485. pmid:27977680
  13. 13. Portoso M, Ragazzini R, Moiani A, Michaud A, Wassef M, Servant N, et al. PRC 2 is dispensable for HOTAIR -mediated transcriptional repression. 2017; 1–14.
  14. 14. Schorderet P, Duboule D. Structural and functional differences in the long non-coding RNA hotair in mouse and human. PLoS Genet. 2011;7: e1002071. pmid:21637793
  15. 15. Yin Y, Yan P, Lu J, Song G, Zhu Y, Li Z, et al. Opposing Roles for the lncRNA Haunt and Its Genomic Locus in Regulating HOXA Gene Activation during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16: 504–516. pmid:25891907
  16. 16. Zhang B, Arun G, Mao YS, Lazar Z, Hung G, Bhattacharjee G, et al. The lncRNA Malat1 is dispensable for mouse development but its transcription plays a cis-regulatory role in the adult. Cell Rep. 2012;2: 111–23. pmid:22840402
  17. 17. Amândio AR, Necsulea A, Joye E, Mascrez B, Duboule D. Hotair Is Dispensible for Mouse Development. PLOS Genet. 2016;12: e1006232. pmid:27977683
  18. 18. Galupa R, Heard E. X-chromosome inactivation: new insights into cis and trans regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2015;31: 57–66. pmid:26004255
  19. 19. Keniry A, Oxley D, Monnier P, Kyba M, Dandolo L, Smits G, et al. The H19 lincRNA is a developmental reservoir of miR-675 that suppresses growth and Igf1r. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14: 659–665. pmid:22684254
  20. 20. Dey BK, Pfeifer K, Dutta A. The H19 long noncoding RNA gives rise to microRNAs miR-675-3p and miR-675-5p to promote skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration. Genes Dev. 2014;28: 491–501. pmid:24532688
  21. 21. Kanduri C. Kcnq1ot1: A chromatin regulatory RNA. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22: 343–350. pmid:21345374
  22. 22. Mohammad F, Mondal T, Guseva N, Pandey GK, Kanduri C. Kcnq1ot1 noncoding RNA mediates transcriptional gene silencing by interacting with Dnmt1. Development. 2010;137: 2493–2499. pmid:20573698
  23. 23. Sauvageau M, Goff L a, Lodato S, Bonev B, Groff AF, Gerhardinger C, et al. Multiple knockout mouse models reveal lincRNAs are required for life and brain development. Elife. 2013;2: e01749. pmid:24381249
  24. 24. Necsulea A, Soumillon M, Warnefors M, Liechti A, Daish T, Zeller U, et al. The evolution of lncRNA repertoires and expression patterns in tetrapods. Nature. 2014;505: 635–40. pmid:24463510
  25. 25. Bae E, Calhoun VC, Levine M, Lewis EB, Drewell RA. Characterization of the intergenic RNA profile at abdominal-A and Abdominal-B in the Drosophila bithorax complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99: 16847–52. pmid:12481037
  26. 26. Bernstein BE, Kamal M, Lindblad-Toh K, Bekiranov S, Bailey DK, Huebert DJ, et al. Genomic maps and comparative analysis of histone modifications in human and mouse. Cell. 2005;120: 169–181. pmid:15680324
  27. 27. Carninci P, Kasukawa , Katayama S., Gough J.,. Frith M. C.,. Maeda N., Oyama R., Ravasi T.,. Lenhard B.,. Wells C.,. Kodzius R., Shimokawa K., Bajic V. B.,. Brenner S. E., Batalov S., Forrest A. R. R., Zavolan M.. The Transcriptional Landscape of the Mammalian Genome. Science. 2006;309: 1559–1563.
  28. 28. Drewell RA, Bae E, Burr J, Lewis EB. Transcription defines the embryonic domains of cis-regulatory activity at the Drosophila bithorax complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99: 16853–16858. pmid:12477928
  29. 29. Sessa L, Breiling A, Lavorgna G, Silvestri L, Casari G, Orlando V. Noncoding RNA synthesis and loss of Polycomb group repression accompanies the colinear activation of the human HOXA cluster. RNA. 2007;13: 223–239. pmid:17185360
  30. 30. Delpretti S, Montavon T, Leleu M, Joye E, Tzika A, Milinkovitch M, et al. Multiple Enhancers Regulate Hoxd Genes and the Hotdog LncRNA during Cecum Budding. Cell Rep. 2013;5: 137–150. pmid:24075990
  31. 31. Li L, Liu B, Wapinski OL, Tsai M-C, Qu K, Zhang J, et al. Targeted Disruption of Hotair Leads to Homeotic Transformation and Gene Derepression. Cell Rep. 2013; 1–10.
  32. 32. Maamar H, Cabili MN, Rinn J, Raj a. linc-HOXA1 is a noncoding RNA that represses Hoxa1 transcription in cis. Genes Dev. 2013; 1260–1271. pmid:23723417
  33. 33. Zhang X, Lian Z, Padden C, Gerstein MB, Rozowsky J, Snyder M, et al. A myelopoiesis-associated regulatory intergenic noncoding RNA transcript within the human HOXA cluster. Blood. 2009;113: 2526–34. pmid:19144990
  34. 34. Sutherland HG, Newton K, Brownstein DG, Holmes MC, Kress C, Semple CA, et al. Disruption of Ledgf/Psip1 results in perinatal mortality and homeotic skeletal transformations. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26: 7201–7210. pmid:16980622
  35. 35. Pradeepa MM, Grimes GR, Taylor GC a, Sutherland HG, Bickmore W a. Psip1/Ledgf p75 restrains Hox gene expression by recruiting both trithorax and polycomb group proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: 9021–32. pmid:25056311
  36. 36. Pradeepa MM, Sutherland HG, Ule J, Grimes GR, Bickmore WA. Psip1/Ledgf p52 binds methylated histone H3K36 and splicing factors and contributes to the regulation of alternative splicing. PLoS Genet. 2012;8: e1002717. pmid:22615581
  37. 37. Ringrose L, Paro R. Polycomb/Trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity. Development. 2007;134: 223–232. pmid:17185323
  38. 38. Wang P, Lin C, Smith ER, Guo H, Sanderson BW, Wu M, et al. Global analysis of H3K4 methylation defines MLL family member targets and points to a role for MLL1-mediated H3K4 methylation in the regulation of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29: 6074–85. pmid:19703992
  39. 39. Williamson I, Eskeland R, Lettice L a, Hill AE, Boyle S, Grimes GR, et al. Anterior-posterior differences in HoxD chromatin topology in limb development. Development. 2012;139: 3157–67. pmid:22872084
  40. 40. Fromental-Ramain C, Warot X, Messadecq N, LeMeur M, Dollé P, Chambon P. Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development. 1996;122: 2997–3011. pmid:8898214
  41. 41. Jerković I, Ibrahim DM, Andrey G, Haas S, Hansen P, Janetzki C, et al. Genome-Wide Binding of Posterior HOXA/D Transcription Factors Reveals Subgrouping and Association with CTCF. PLOS Genet. 2017;13: e1006567. pmid:28103242
  42. 42. Chu C, Quinn J, Chang HY. Chromatin Isolation by RNA Purification (ChIRP). J Vis Exp. 2012; 4–9.
  43. 43. Therizols P, Illingworth RS, Courilleau C, Boyle S, Wood AJ, Bickmore WA. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells. Science. 2014;346: 1704–1709.
  44. 44. Gilbert L a Larson MH, Morsut L, Liu Z, Brar G a, Torres SE, et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell. 2013;154: 442–51. pmid:23849981
  45. 45. Gilbert LA, Horlbeck MA, Adamson B, Villalta JE, Chen Y, Whitehead EH, et al. Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation. Cell. 2014; 1–15.
  46. 46. Qi LS, Larson MH, Gilbert L a, Doudna J a, Weissman JS, Arkin AP, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell. 2013;152: 1173–83. pmid:23452860
  47. 47. Cheng AW, Wang H, Yang H, Shi L, Katz Y, Theunissen TW, et al. Multiplexed activation of endogenous genes by CRISPR-on, an RNA-guided transcriptional activator system. Cell Res. 2013;23: 1163–1171. pmid:23979020
  48. 48. Levitt N, Briggs D, Gil A, Proudfoot NJ. Definition of an efficient synthetic poly(A) site. Genes Dev. 1989;3: 1019–1025. pmid:2570734
  49. 49. Cheng Y, Jutooru I, Chadalapaka G, Corton JC, Safe S. The long non-coding RNA HOTTIP enhances pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, survival and migration. Oncotarget. 2015;6: 10840–52. pmid:25912306
  50. 50. Li Z, Zhao X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Zhou Q, Ye H, et al. The long non-coding RNA HOTTIP promotes progression and gemcitabine resistance by regulating HOXA13 in pancreatic cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13: 1–16.
  51. 51. Quagliata L, Matter MS, Piscuoglio S, Arabi L, Ruiz C, Procino A, et al. Long noncoding RNA HOTTIP/HOXA13 expression is associated with disease progression and predicts outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Hepatology. 2014;59: 911–23. pmid:24114970
  52. 52. Ge Y, Yan X, Jin Y, Yang X, Yu X, Zhou L, et al. fMiRNA-192 and miRNA-204 Directly Suppress lncRNA HOTTIP and Interrupt GLS1-Mediated Glutaminolysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS Genet. 2015;11: 1–19.
  53. 53. Andersson R, Gebhard C, Miguel-Escalada I, Hoof I, Bornholdt J, Boyd M, et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature. 2014;507: 455–61. pmid:24670763
  54. 54. Arner E, Weinhold N, Jacobsen A, Schultz N, Sander C, Lee W, et al. Transcribed enhancers lead waves of coordinated transcription in transitioning mammalian cells. Science. 2015;347: 1010–1015. pmid:25678556
  55. 55. Pefanis E, Wang J, Rothschild G, Lim J, Kazadi D, Sun J, et al. RNA exosome-regulated long non-coding RNA transcription controls super-enhancer activity. Cell. 2015;161: 774–789. pmid:25957685
  56. 56. Pradeepa MM, Grimes GR, Kumar Y, Olley G, Taylor GCA, Schneider R, et al. Histone H3 globular domain acetylation identifies a new class of enhancers. Nat Genet. 2016;48: 681–686. pmid:27089178
  57. 57. Pradeepa MM. Causal role of histone acetylations in enhancer function. Transcription. 2017;8: 40–47. pmid:27792455
  58. 58. Ørom UA, Derrien T, Beringer M, Gumireddy K, Gardini A, Bussotti G, et al. Long noncoding RNAs with enhancer-like function in human cells. Cell. 2010;143: 46–58. pmid:20887892
  59. 59. Paralkar VR, Taborda CC, Huang P, Yao Y, Kossenkov A V, Prasad R, et al. Unlinking an lncRNA from Its Associated cis Element. Mol Cell. 2016;62: 104–110. pmid:27041223
  60. 60. Groff AF, Sanchez-Gomez DB, Soruco MML, Gerhardinger C, Barutcu AR, Li E, et al. InVivo Characterization of Linc-p21 Reveals Functional cis-Regulatory DNA Elements. Cell Rep. 2016;16: 2178–2186. pmid:27524623
  61. 61. Engreitz AJM, Haines JE, Munson G, Chen J, Elizabeth M, Kane M, et al. Neighborhood regulation by lncRNA promoters, transcription, and splicing. Nature. 2016;539: 452–455.
  62. 62. Anderson KM, Anderson DM, McAnally JR, Shelton JM, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Transcription of the non-coding RNA upperhand controls Hand2 expression and heart development. Nature. 2016;2: 1–13.
  63. 63. Shun M- C, Raghavendra NK, Vandegraaff N, Daigle JE, Hughes S, Kellam P, et al. LEDGF/p75 functions downstream from preintegration complex formation to effect gene-specific HIV-1 integration. Genes Dev. 2007;21: 1767–78. pmid:17639082
  64. 64. Taylor G, Eskeland R, Hekimoglu-Balkan B, Pradeepa M, Bickmore WA. H4K16 acetylation marks active genes and enhancers of embryonic stem cells, but does not alter chromatin compaction. Genome Res. 2013;23: 2053–2065. pmid:23990607
  65. 65. Hecksher-Sørensen J, Hill RE, Lettice L. Double labeling for whole-mount in situ hybridization in mouse. Biotechniques. 1998;24: 914–918. pmid:9631179
  66. 66. Ran F, Hsu P, Wright J, Agarwala V. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8: 2281–308. pmid:24157548
  67. 67. Chen B, Gilbert L a, Cimini B a, Schnitzbauer J, Zhang W, Li G-W, et al. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell. 2013;155: 1479–91. pmid:24360272