Enhanced root hair production, which increases the root surface area for nutrient uptake, is a typical adaptive response of plants to phosphate (Pi) starvation. Although previous studies have shown that ethylene plays an important role in root hair development induced by Pi starvation, the underlying molecular mechanism is not understood. In this work, we characterized an Arabidopsis mutant, hps5, that displays constitutive ethylene responses and increased sensitivity to Pi starvation due to a mutation in the ethylene receptor ERS1. hps5 accumulates high levels of EIN3 protein, a key transcription factor involved in the ethylene signaling pathway, under both Pi sufficiency and deficiency. Pi starvation also increases the accumulation of EIN3 protein. Combined molecular, genetic, and genomic analyses identified a group of genes that affect root hair development by regulating cell wall modifications. The expression of these genes is induced by Pi starvation and is enhanced in the EIN3-overexpressing line. In contrast, the induction of these genes by Pi starvation is suppressed in ein3 and ein3eil1 mutants. EIN3 protein can directly bind to the promoter of these genes, some of which are also the immediate targets of RSL4, a key transcription factor that regulates root hair development. Based on these results, we propose that under normal growth conditions, the level of ethylene is low in root cells; a group of key transcription factors, including RSL4 and its homologs, trigger the transcription of their target genes to promote root hair development; Pi starvation increases the levels of the protein EIN3, which directly binds to the promoters of the genes targeted by RSL4 and its homologs and further increase their transcription, resulting in the enhanced production of root hairs. This model not only explains how ethylene mediates root hair responses to Pi starvation, but may provide a general mechanism for how ethylene regulates root hair development under both stress and non-stress conditions.
Phytohormone ethylene has previously been known to play an important role in mediating root hair development induced by phosphate starvation; however, the underlying molecular mechanism is not understood. Using combined molecular, genetic, and genomic approaches, we identify a group of genes that affect root hair development by regulating cell wall modifications. Pi starvation increase the stability of EIN3 protein, a key component in the ethylene signaling pathway. The expression of the identified root hair-related genes is enhanced in the EIN3-overexpressing line, but suppressed in the ein3 mutant. Furthermore, EIN3 protein directly binds to the promoter of these genes which are also targeted by a key transcription factor that regulates root hair development. This work not only explains how ethylene mediates root hair responses to phosphate starvation, but may provide a general mechanism for how ethylene regulates root hair development under both stress and non-stress conditions.
Citation: Song L, Yu H, Dong J, Che X, Jiao Y, Liu D (2016) The Molecular Mechanism of Ethylene-Mediated Root Hair Development Induced by Phosphate Starvation. PLoS Genet 12(7): e1006194. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006194
Editor: Sarah Hake, University of California Berkeley, UNITED STATES
Received: March 8, 2016; Accepted: June 23, 2016; Published: July 18, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The raw data of Illumina reads are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive browser (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra; accession no. SRP071563).
Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC) (31170238; http://www.nsfc.org.cn/), the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) of China (2014ZX0800932B; http://www.moa.gov.cn/), and Bayer (http://www.cropscience.bayer.com/)to DL. NFSC and MOA had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Bayer reviewed the manuscript before its submission for publication.
Competing interests: This work was partly supported by a fund from Bayer to DL.
As an essential macronutrient, phosphorus (P) plays vital roles in plant growth, development, and metabolism. P not only serves as structural elements of nucleic acids and phospholipids, but is also involved in many important biological processes, including photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, regulation of enzymatic activities, and cell signaling. Using the Pi transporters localized on the root surface, plants take up P from the soil in the form of inorganic phosphate (Pi) . When plants are exposed to Pi deficiency, they activate an array of adaptive responses to cope with this nutritional stress. These responses involve developmental, biochemical, and physiological changes, including the reprogramming of root development; increased activities of high affinity Pi transporters; the induction and secretion of acid phosphatases, RNases, and organic acids; and the accumulation of anthocyanin and starch [2,3].
The Pi starvation-induced changes in root development include the inhibition of primary root growth and the increased production of lateral roots and root hairs . Root hairs, which are tubular outgrowths of root epidermal cells, account for a large portion of the root surface area involved in water and nutrient uptake . For rye plants grown under Pi starvation, root hairs are responsible for nearly 60% of the Pi absorbed . In Pi deficient-Arabidopsis plants, root hairs represent 91% of the total root surface area . Under low Pi conditions, wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis plants acquire more Pi than mutants that are defective in root hair formation . Root hairs also modify the rhizosphere by exuding large amounts of organic acids, enzymes, mucilage, and secondary metabolites . The enhanced growth of root hairs has been thought to be the earliest root morphological response to Pi starvation . Low Pi availability increases root hair length by increasing root hair growth rate and growth duration . The increase in root hair density in Pi deficient-plants is due to the increase in trichoblast file number, the reduction in trichoblast length, and/or the increase in the percentage of trichoblast cells that form root hairs [11,12].
Pi starvation alters ethylene biosynthesis and sensitivity in plants (for a review, see ). Ethylene is a gaseous phytohormone that has many functions in plant growth and development and in plant responses to stress conditions. In Arabidopsis, ethylene is perceived by five receptors located in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes . In the absence of ethylene, ethylene receptors activate CTR1 (CONSTITUTIVE TRIPL1 RESPONSE1, a Raf1-like kinase), which subsequently suppresses the function of its downstream target EIN2 (ETHYLENE INSENSTIVE2). When ethylene binds to its receptors, it inactivates CTR1, which causes the translocation of a C-terminal fragment of EIN2 (EIN2-C’) into the nucleus. In the nucleus, EIN2-C’ increases the protein levels of EIN3 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3) and its closest homolog EIL1 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE1), two key transcription factors of the ethylene signaling pathway. EIN3 and EIL1 then turn on the transcription of a battery of downstream target genes, which initiate a diverse array of plant responses to internal and external cues.
Ethylene has long been known to be a positive regulator of root hair development [15,16]. It acts downstream of the key transcription factors GL2 and RHD6 to promote root hair formation . Previous reports have also indicated that ethylene plays an important role in Pi starvation-induced root hair development [7,12]. Application of inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis or action reduces Pi starvation-induced root hair development in Arabidopsis. Similarly, the root hair responses to Pi starvation are significantly attenuated in ethylene-insensitive mutants of Arabidopsis . To date, however, the molecular mechanism of how ethylene mediates Pi starvation-induced root hair development remains unknown.
In this report, we characterize an Arabidopsis mutant, hps5, that carries a mutation in the ethylene receptor ERS1. hps5 accumulates higher levels of EIN3 protein than the WT under both Pi sufficiency and deficiency. Pi starvation also increases the accumulation of EIN3. By combining genetic, molecular, and transcriptomic approaches, we first identify a group of ethylene-regulated genes involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development. We show that EIN3 directly binds to the promoters of genes that are the targets of a key transcription factor that regulates root hair development. Finally, we propose a working model of how ethylene mediates root hair responses to Pi starvation. This model may also provide a general mechanism for how ethylene regulates root hair development under both stress and non-stress conditions.
hps5 has enhanced root hairs production
To identify the molecular components involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair production, we performed a large-scale screen for the Arabidopsis mutants with enhanced root hair production under Pi deficiency. One such mutant, hps5 (hypersensitive to Pi starvation5), was obtained through this screen. Both root hair length and root hair density were increased in hps5 compared to the WT under Pi deficiency (P-) (Fig 1A and 1B). Root hair production was also greater in hps5 than in the WT under Pi sufficiency (P+).
(A), Morphology of 7-day-old seedlings of the WT and hps5 grown on P+ and P- media. (B), A close view of the root tips of the WT and hps5.
In addition to producing more root hairs, hps5 also exhibited altered primary and lateral root growth. Pi starvation inhibited primary root growth and promoted lateral root formation in the WT (Fig 1). At 7 days after germination (DAG), the primary root was about 30% shorter for hps5 than for the WT on P+ medium but was about 50% shorter on P- medium (S1A Fig). At 9 DAG, lateral root density was less for hps5 than for the WT on P+ medium but was similar on P- medium (S1B Fig).
hps5 has altered sensitivity in other Pi starvation responses
Next, we examined other Pi responses of hps5. Induction and secretion of acid phosphatases (APases) is a hallmark response of plants to Pi deficiency . The Pi starvation-induced APases function in Pi remobilization and recycling in old tissues, and in the utilization of organophosphate compounds in the rhizosphere. The APase activity on the root surface can be detected by histochemical staining using the APase substrate BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate) . Cleavage of BCIP by APases produces a blue precipitate. Using this method, we found that hps5 had a stronger blue staining on its root surface than the WT under Pi deficiency (S2A Fig). Under Pi sufficiency (P+), hps5 roots also exhibited a light blue staining while WT roots were white (S2A Fig). The enhanced root surface-associated APase activity in hps5 was confirmed by quantitative analysis (S2B Fig).
The expression of eight Pi starvation-induced marker genes was analyzed. These genes encode two non-coding transcripts, At4 and IPS1; an RNase, RNS1; a microRNA, miRNA399D; two APases, ACP5 (AtPAP17) and AtPAP10; and two high-affinity Pi transporters, AtPT1 (Pht1;1) and AtPT2 (Pht1;4) . At 7 DAG, the expression of all of these marker genes, except AtPT1 and AtPT2, was significantly higher in hps5 seedlings than in the WT under Pi deficiency (S3 Fig).
Accumulation of anthocyanin in leaves is another characteristic response of plants to Pi starvation. Induction of anthocyanin is thought to protect the chloroplast membranes under Pi deficiency . At 10 DAG on P- medium and P- medium with 10–100 μM Pi, the leaves of the seedlings had turned purple but the intensity of the purple was greater in the WT than in hps5 (S4 Fig). These results indicated that hps5 was less sensitive to Pi starvation-induced anthocyanin accumulation in leaves.
The total P and cellular Pi contents in shoots and roots of 9-day-old seedlings did not significantly differ between hps5 and the WT under either P+ or P- conditions (S5 Fig).
hps5 contains a point mutation in the ethylene receptor ERS1
When hps5 was backcrossed to the WT, all of the F1 plants showed WT phenotypes. The F2 progeny derived from the selfed F1 plants segregated into WT and mutant phenotypes in a ratio of about 3:1 (203:62), indicating that the mutant phenotypes were caused by a single recessive mutation. Using a map-based cloning approach (S6 Fig), we found a C to T mutation in the second exon of the ERS1 gene (At2g40940) in hps5 (Fig 2A). This mutation converted a proline to a leucine at the position of 110 of the ERS1 protein. Depending on the program used for prediction, the mutated proline residue was predicted to be located at the third or fourth amino acid position after the transmembrane domain III [21, 22]. This amino acid residue is highly conserved in the ERS1 orthologs in all major crops (S7 Fig), suggesting that it is important for the receptor function of ERS1.
(A), Diagrams showing the positions of the mutations in the ERS1 gene and ERS1 protein. Top: the structure of the ERS1 gene. Black box: exons; grey box: 5’ and 3’ UTRs; thin line: introns; thick line: flanking sequences surrounding the ERS1 gene. Bottom: the structure of the ERS1 protein showing the signature domains. (B), Morphology of 7-day-old seedlings and root tips of the WT, hps5, and complementation lines grown on P+ and P- media. (C), Quantitative analyses of root hair density and root hair length of various lines. Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the WT (t-test, P < 0.05). For each measurement, 15–20 seedlings were used.
To confirm that the mutated ERS1 gene was responsible for the hps5 phenotypes, we introduced the genomic sequence of WT ERS1 back into hps5 plants under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter or ERS1’s own promoter. Both gene constructs (CaMV 35S::ERS1 and ERS1::ERS1) could fully complement the hps5 phenotypes on P+ medium, in terms of reduced primary root growth, increased root hair production, and enhanced root-associated APase activity (Fig 2B and S8 Fig). On P- medium, however, the two gene constructs could only partially rescue these mutant phenotypes (Fig 2B and 2C, S8 Fig). Partial complementation under P- condition may result from interference between the mutated ERS1 protein and the other ethylene receptors that is not fully reversed by the WT ERS1 transgenic protein.
hps5 seedlings display constitutive ethylene responses
When treated with ethylene in the dark, Arabidopsis seedlings display a characteristic “triple response”, i.e., an inhibition of root and hypocotyl growth, a radial swelling of the root and hypocotyl, and an increase in the curvature of the apical hook . When grown in soil, WT Arabidopsis plants treated with ethylene or the mutant with constitutive ethylene response are small in stature. We compared these growth characteristics among the WT and the mutants hps5, ein2, and ctr1. ein2 is completely insensitive to ethylene , and ctr1 displays constitutive ethylene responses . When grown in the dark in the absence of ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid), a precursor of ethylene biosynthesis, the WT and ein2 had a long hypocotyl and a mild apical hook whereas ctr1 had a much shorter hypocotyl and an exaggerated apical hook (Fig 3A and 3B). For hps5, the length of the hypocotyl and the curvature of the apical hook were intermediate relative to the WT and ctr1. When treated with 1 μM ACC, the WT, hps5, and ctr1 produced shorter hypocotyls and apical hooks with increased curvature, while ein2 did not respond to ACC. Under normal growth conditions, hps5 also showed higher expression of the ethylene-responsive genes ERF1, EBF2, and CHIB  than the WT (Fig 3C). Together, these results indicate that hps5 seedlings display a moderate constitutive ethylene response.
(A), Morphology of 4-day-old etiolated seedlings of the WT, ein2, hps5, and ctr1 grown in the dark in the absence or presence of 1 μM ACC. (B), The length of the hypocotyls of the seedlings in (A). Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. (C), Relative expression as determined by qPCR of the ethylene-responsive marker genes in the 7-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings. Values are means ± SD of three technical replications in one experiment that was performed three times with similar results. In (B) and (C), Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the WT (t-test, P < 0.05).
The size and morphology of adult plants grown in soil did not significantly differ between hps5 and the WT (S9 Fig).
The hps5 mutation has a “dominant-negative” effect
Arabidopsis has five ethylene receptors: ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, EIN4, and ERS2 . Because of functional redundancy, the loss-of-function mutation in a single receptor gene does not cause any mutant phenotypes. In contrast, a point mutation that abolishes the binding of ethylene to any of these five receptors makes plants insensitive to ethylene [27,28]. Because the point mutation in ERS1 caused constitutive ethylene responses, we suspected that this mutation had a “dominant-negative” effect, an effect that interferes with the functions of other ethylene receptors. To test this hypothesis, we isolated the mutated ERS1 gene (mERS1) from hps5 and introduced it into WT plants under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. When grown in soil, most of 25 primary transformants were smaller than the WT. Overexpression of the mERS1 gene was confirmed by qPCR in six selected transgenic lines (S10 Fig). We then generated homozygote plants for the transgene (35S::mERS1) for these lines. When grown on P+ and P- media, the seedlings of these lines showed strong inhibition of primary root growth (Fig 4A and S11 Fig), increased root hair production (Fig 4B), and enhanced root-associated APase activity (S12A and S12B Fig), mimicking the phenotypes of hps5. When grown in soil, the size of these six transgenic lines varied, but they were all smaller than the WT and hps5 (Fig 5). These results suggested that the mutated ERS1 protein might interfere with the functions of WT ERS1 and other ethylene receptors in the transgenic plants.
(A), Morphology of 7-day-old seedlings of the WT, hps5, and three 35S::mERS1 transgenic lines grown on P+ and P- media. (B), A close view of the root tips of the seedlings in (A). In (A) and (B), the numbers at the top are the names of the transgenic lines.
hps5 mutation and Pi starvation increase the accumulation of EIN3 protein
To investigate how ethylene signaling is enhanced in hps5, we compared the mRNA and protein levels of EIN3 in roots of the WT and hps5. qPCR analysis indicated that the mRNA level of EIN3 in the WT and hps5 was similar under both P+ and P- conditions (S13A Fig); as revealed by Western blot, however, the level of EIN3 protein was higher in hps5 than in the WT (Fig 6A). We then examined the effects of Pi starvation on the transcription and protein accumulation of EIN3. Like hps5 mutation, Pi starvation did not alter the level of EIN3 mRNA (S13B Fig) but increased the accumulation of EIN3 protein (Fig 6B).
(A) Western blot analysis of EIN3 proteins in WT and hps5 seedlings. (B) Western blot analysis of EIN3 proteins in WT plants treated or not treated with 10 μM ACC. In (A) and (B), the antibodies raised against native EIN3 protein were used. The proteins extracted from the seedlings of the EIN3 OX line were used as the positive control of EIN3 protein. (C) Confocal analysis of the accumulation of EIN3-GFP in the root tips of 7-day-old 35S::EIN3-GFP seedlings grown under various conditions.
Ethylene or ACC treatment is known to induce the accumulation of EIN3 protein by blocking its degradation as mediated by the F-box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 . By Western blot analysis, we found that the ACC-induced accumulation of EIN3 protein in roots was further enhanced by Pi starvation (Fig 6B). This result was corroborated by the confocal analysis of the expression of EIN3-GFP fusion proteins in the transgenic line expressing the EIN3-GFP fusion gene under the control of the 35S promoter (Fig 6C).
EIN3 and EIL1 are involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development
Because Pi starvation increases the accumulation of EIN3 protein, we next asked whether EIN3 and its closest homolog, EIL1, are directly involved in the Pi starvation-induced root hair development. To answer this question, we analyzed the root hair phenotypes of ein3 and ein3eil1 mutants and of an EIN3-overexpressing line (EIN3 OX). On P+ medium, the root hair density and root hair length of ein3 and ein3eil1 did not significantly differ from those of the WT (Fig 7). On P- medium, root hair density was lower for both ein3 and ein3eil1 than for the WT but root hair length was reduced only for ein3eil1. In contrast, both root hair length and root hair density were greatly increased in EIN3 OX relative to the WT. These results indicate that EIN3 and EIL1 are involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair production.
(A), Root hair patterns of the first 3 mm of the root tips of 7-day-old WT, ein3, ein3eil1, and EIN3 OX seedlings grown on P+ and P- media. (B) and (C), Quantitative analyses of root hair density and length of the WT, ein3, ein3eil1, and EIN3 OX seedlings in (A). Values represent means ± SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the WT (t-test, P < 0.05).
Identification of the target genes of the ethylene signaling involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development
To identify the downstream targets of the ethylene signaling involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development, we compared the transcriptomes of the WT, hps5, ein3, and ein3eil1. The cDNA libraries were constructed using the total RNAs isolated from 7-day-old seedlings grown on P+ or P- medium. For each combination of genotype and Pi treatment, two biological replicates were used. Log2≥1 or ≤-1 (2-fold change in expression levels) and FDR (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.01 were used as the cut off for selection of the genes whose expression levels significantly differed from that of P+ WT. The transcriptomic data indicated that the expression of Pi-responsive marker genes, such as Pht1;1, Pht1;4, ACP5, At4, and SPX1, was upregulated in P- WT compared to P+ WT (S1 Table), indicating that the experimental conditions for RNA-seq analyses were proper.
We first compared the expression profiles of hps5 and the WT grown on P+ medium. Surprisingly, based on our selection criteria, there were only 61 genes whose expression was upregulated and 43 genes whose expression was downregulated in hps5 relative to the WT (S2 Table). This indicated that the effect of hps5 mutation on gene expression at the genomic level was relatively mild, which was consistent with the absence of developmental abnormality for adult hps5 plants grown in soil. Among the 61 upregulated genes, there were seven RHS (Root Hair-Specific) genes , including RHS2 (a MATE [multidrug and toxin efflux] family protein), RHS12 (a pectinesterase), RHS13 (an extensin-like protein), RHS14 (a pectate lyase), RHS15 (a glycerol-3-phosphate permease, G3PP2), RHS18 (a peroxidase), and RHS19 (a peroxidase). The induction level of RHS16 (a leucine-rich repeat protein kinase) was also close to 2-fold (Log2 = 0.97). RHS2, RHS16, and RHS18 have previously been shown to be involved in root hair elongation or branching . In addition, the upregulated genes included two xyloglucan endotransglucosylases (XTH12 and XTH14), two other peroxidases (PER13a and At3g49960), and one pectin methyltransferase inhibitor. XTH12 and XTH14 are the two most closely related members of the XTH family in Arabidopsis and are mainly expressed in roots . The enzymatic activity of the recombinant XTH14 protein has been demonstrated in vitro and this protein can affect cell elongation and root hair morphology . In addition, there were 16 cell wall proteins, including 10 proline-rich extensins (EXT2, EXT7, EXT10, EXT11, EXT12, EXT13, EXT14, EXT15, EXT16, and EXT18), two proline-rich proteins (PRP1 and PRP3), two leucine-rich repeat extensins (LRX1 and LRX2), one FASCICLIN-like arabinogalactan protein (FLA6), and one arabinogalactan protein (AGP3). Among them, the knockout mutants for EXT7, EXT11, EXT14, EXT16, and EXT18 , and LRX1 and LRX2  have abnormal root hair initiation, elongation, and morphologies. The expression of PRP3 and AGP3 is regulated by root hair-specific developmental pathways [34,35]. Besides, COW1 (CAN OF WORMS1), AHA7 (Arabidopsis H+-ATPase 7), and ARGOS-like (ARL) genes were upregulated in hps5. COW1 encodes a Sec14p-like phosphatidylinositol transfer protein . The loss-of-function mutants of COW1 and its homolog in rice, OsSNDP1, produced short root hairs with irregular shapes [36,37]. The aha7 T-DNA insertional mutant has reduced root hair density under both normal and Fe-deficient conditions . Because the initiation and elongation of root hairs are associated with a localized decrease in apoplastic pH , AHA7 may regulate root hair density by modifying local pH levels. ARL functions in cell expansion-dependent organ growth . Reduced expression or overexpression of ARL results in decreased or increased cell size in Arabidopsis cotyledons, leaves, and other lateral organs.
Notably, five of the genes that were upregulated in hps5 are involved in jasmonate (JA) biosynthesis or signalling. These genes encode phospholipase A 2A (PLA2A) , sulfotransferase 2A (ST2A) , lipoxygenase 2 (LOX2) , salt tolerance zinc finger (ZAT10) , and octadecanoid-responsive AP2/ERF59 (ORA59) . This suggests that enhanced ethylene signaling might upregulate JA biosynthesis and signalling.
None of the 43 genes that were downregulated in P+ hps5 relative to P+ WT was significantly enriched in any functional category, except that five of the genes encoding bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily proteins (S2 Table). The biological relevance of the downregulation of these genes is unknown.
We then analysed the transcriptomes of the Pi deficient-WT (P- WT) seedlings. Under our experimental conditions, 1,594 genes were upregulated (Fig 8A) and 673 genes were downregulated in the WT in response to Pi deficiency (S1 Table). Among the 61 upregulated genes in P+ hps5 (S2 Table), 43 were also upregulated by Pi starvation in the WT, and these included the seven RHSs and the genes encoding most cell wall proteins and cell wall modifying enzymes (Fig 8A, Table 1). The accuracy of the RNA-seq experiments was verified by qPCR analysis of six selected genes (S14 Fig). We then examined the expression of these 43 genes in P- ein3 and P- ein3eil1 (S3 and S4 Tables). The expression levels of 37 genes were lower in P- ein3 than in P- WT (Fig 8B, Table 1). And, the expression of most of these 37 genes was further downregulated in P- ein3eil1 (Fig 8B, Table 1). These RNA-seq results were also validated by qPCR analysis of six selected genes (S15 Fig). Furthermore, we randomly selected eight genes for qPCR analysis and found that their expression in the EIN3 OX line was significantly elevated under normal growth conditions (Fig 8C).
(A), A Venn diagram showing the number of transcripts upregulated in P+ hps5 (blue) and P- WT (yellow), respectively, and the number of transcripts which are upregulated in both P+ hps5 and P- WT (grey). (B), Hierarchical clusters displaying the Pi starvation-induced genes in the WT, ein3, and ein3eil1 plants. (C), Expression of eight genes in EIN3 OX relative to the WT as determined by qPCR. The expression of each of these genes in the WT was set to 1.0.
Together, the results suggest that the transcription of these 37 starvation-induced genes is regulated by ethylene signaling via the modulation of levels of EIN3/EIL1 proteins.
Functional analysis of the putative root hair-related genes
To confirm the function of some upregulated genes in hps5 in root hair development, we examined the phenotypes of the T-DNA insertion lines for 14 genes; we found that the T-DNA lines for six genes (EXT13, At2g16586, UCC3, ORA59, RHS15, and RHS19) showed some defects in root hair development. Because RHS15 and RHS19 are specifically expressed in root hairs , we conducted a detailed analysis of the root hair phenotypes for these two genes using their T-DNA insertion lines and overexpressing lines, which were generated using a root hair-specific EXP7 promoter . Three homozygote SALK lines containing T-DNA insertions in the promoter of RHS15 (SALK_015573, SALK_015669, and SALK_117952), and three homozygote SALK lines containing T-DNA insertions in the third exon (SALK_093852), the promoter (SALK_010873), and the 3’UTR (SALK_020724) of RHS19, respectively, were identified (S16A Fig) by genotyping using the primers listed in S5 Table. qPCR analyses showed that the three SALK lines of RHS15 were knockdown lines and that the three RHS19 T-DNA lines were nearly null mutants (S16B and S16C Fig). Under Pi sufficiency, root hair density of all three T-DNA lines for RHS15 and RHS19 did not significantly differ from that of the WT; however, root hairs were shorter for two rhs15 lines and two rhs19 lines than for the WT (Fig 9). Under Pi deficiency, both root hair density and length of all three T-DNA lines for RHS15 and RHS19 were reduced compared to the WT. In the overexpressing lines for these two genes (S16B and S16C Fig), in contrast, root hair density and length tended to be greater than for the WT under both P+ and P- conditions (Fig 9).
EIN3 directly binds to the promoters of upregulated genes in hps5
EIN3/EIL1 bind to DNA with a consensus sequence of A(C/T)G(A/T)A(C/T)CT . We then analyzed the promoter regions of 12 upregulated genes in P+ hps5 and found that all of them contained 1 to 8 putative EIN3-binding sites (S17 Fig). To determine whether EIN3 can directly bind to these promoters, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays using the transgenic line expressing an 35S::EIN3-GFP fusion gene . The chromatins of 10-day-old seedlings of the WT and 35S::EIN3-GFP line grown under P+ or P- conditions were isolated, cross-linked, and precipitated with anti-GFP antibodies. The DNA fragments that precipitated with EIN3-GFP proteins were analyzed by qPCR. The results showed that PCR-amplified EIN3-binding sites in 10 of the 12 selected genes were enriched in the immuno-precipitated chromatins from the EIN3-GFP plants but not from the WT plants (Fig 10). These results indicated that EIN3 could directly bind to one or more EIN3-binding sites on the promoters of these 10 genes, including RHS15 and RHS19, in planta. The binding affinity to EIN3, however, varied among sites. The binding of EIN3 to most of these promoters was not further enhanced by Pi starvation, probably because of the overexpression of EIN3 as directed by the strong 35S promoter.
Chromatins from the WT and 35S::EIN3-GFP transgenic plants were isolated and immuno-precipitated with GFP-Trap. The levels of enrichment of the precipitated DNA fragments were quantified by qPCR assays. An actin gene fragment was amplified as the internal control. Values are means ± SD of three replicates. Experiments were repeated two times with similar results. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from the WT (t-test, P < 0.05).
To provide more evidence that EIN3 can directly bind to the promoter of these genes, we carried out electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) using recombinant EIN3 proteins produced in E. coli cells. The recombinant proteins contain the DNA-binding domain of EIN3 (amino acids 141–352). This truncated EIN3 protein was fused with a GST protein to facilitate protein purification. The DNA probes used in EMSA were tandemly repeated tetramers of the putative EIN3-binding elements with 5-bp flanking sequences on each side (The sequences of the DNA probes are listed in S6 Table). The EIN3-binding elements tested in the EMSA assays were selected from promoters of four genes (PRP1, EXT14, RHS15, and RHS19) that showed high binding affinity to EIN3 in the ChIP assays. The EMSA results indicated that the recombinant GST-EIN3 proteins, but not GST protein alone, can bind to the biotin-labelled probes. The binding of EIN3-GST proteins to the biotin-labelled probes could be competed out by unlabelled probes, indicating that the binding is sequence-specific (Fig 11).
The gene names are indicated at the bottom of each panel. They are PRP1 (A), RHS19 (B), EXT14 (C), and RHS15 (D). The experiment was performed using 0.1 μg of EIN3-GST or GST proteins. The biotin-labelled probe contained 10 fmol of the EIN3-binding element. The 500 X excess unlabeled probe (cold probe) was used as a competitor.
EIN3 and RSL4 share some direct targets involved in root hair development
RSL4 (ROOT HAIR DEFECTIVE 6 [RHD6]-LIKE4) is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor that is important for root hair development. The loss-of-function mutant of RSL4 had reduced root hair density and root hair length . In contrast, the RSL4 OX lines had increased root hair density and root hair length. Yi et al.  further showed that the transcription and protein accumulation of RSL4 are enhanced by Pi starvation and that the induction of root hair growth by Pi starvation is impaired in rsl4. Eighty-three putative direct targets of RSL4 were identified by comparative RNA-seq analyses using the WT, rsl4, and RSL4 OX lines . We compared these 83 genes and 61 upregulated genes in P+ hps5 and found that 19 genes were in common (Table 1, the genes indicated by asterisks). Among them, the functions of seven genes in root hair development have been experimentally demonstrated. These results suggested that EIN3 and RSL4 might bind to the same promoters of a subset of downstream target genes involved in root hair development.
To determine whether RSL4 itself is regulated by ethylene signaling, we examined RSL4 expression in 7-day-old seedlings grown on P+ and P- media in the absence or presence of ACC. The results indicated that the expression of RSL4 was induced by Pi starvation, which was consistent with , but was not induced by ACC (S18 Fig).
As an important adaptive response to Pi deficiency, plants enhance their root hair production, including the increase in both root hair density and root hair length. This response is thought to increase the surface area of roots for Pi uptake and root exudation. Root hair development induced by Pi starvation is mediated by the phytohormone ethylene . Although the ethylene signaling pathway has been well elucidated , the molecular mechanism of how ethylene mediates Pi starvation-induced root hair development remains unknown.
In this work, we identified an Arabidopsis mutant, hps5, that displays enhanced root hair production under both Pi sufficiency and deficiency (Fig 1). hps5 also has other altered responses to Pi deficiency, and these include increased root-associated APase activity, increased Pi starvation-induced gene expression, and reduced anthocyanin accumulation (S2–S4 Figs). These altered Pi responses are caused by a mutation in the ethylene receptor ERS1 (Fig 2). By analyzing three Arabidopsis hps (hypersensitive to Pi starvation) mutants (hps2, hps3, and hps4), we previously showed that enhanced ethylene biosynthesis or ethylene signaling makes plant hypersensitive to Pi starvation [50,51,20]. The Pi responses of hps5 are similar to those of these three hps mutants and are consistent with an enhancement of ethylene signaling. This inference is further supported by the enhanced apical hook and increased expression of ethylene-responsive genes in hps5 seedlings, and by the retarded growth of plants overexpressing the mutated ERS1 gene (Figs 3–5). On the other hand, Pi deficiency has been shown to increase plant sensitivity to ethylene (for a review, see ). For example, the effects of ethylene on the induction of the Pi transporter gene Pht1;4  and root hair development  were much stronger under Pi deficiency than under Pi sufficiency, indicating a cross-talk between ethylene and phosphorus availability. Enhanced ethylene biosynthesis or signaling is known to induce the accumulation of EIN3 protein . The results of the current study show that ethylene induces greater EIN3 accumulation when plants are exposed to Pi starvation (Fig 6), suggesting that Pi starvation increases the stability of EIN3. Therefore, EIN3 may act as the convergent point for the cross-talk between ethylene and low-Pi signal. That Pi deficiency increases the accumulation of EIN3 protein may also be the molecular basis for how Pi deficiency enhances plant sensitivity to ethylene.
Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses of hps5 provided us with a good opportunity to identify the downstream targets of the ethylene signaling involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development (Fig 8). Ethylene has multiple effects on plant growth and development, including the inhibition of root growth and the promotion of root hair production, leaf and flower senescence, and fruit ripening . Because the morphological changes in hps5 were evident only for roots at the seedling stage, the root seems to be the most sensitive organ in response to the ethylene signal. Thus, a transcriptomic analysis of hps5 may help identify the target genes of ethylene signaling involved in root development, including root hair formation.
Root hair formation involves three steps, i.e., cell fate specification, hair initiation, and hair elongation. An elegant regulatory pathway regulating hair cell specification has been established in Arabidopsis [35,53,54]. GL2 is a negative transcriptional regulator of root hair formation. In the hair cells, an upstream complex consisting of TTG1, GL3, EGL3, CPC, and other proteins suppresses the expression of GL2 and thus releases the expression of its target genes, including a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor RHD6 and its several homolog RSLs (RHD6-LIKEs) . RSL2 and RSL4 are also the immediate targets of RHD6 . These transcription factors then turn on the expression of a battery of downstream genes that directly participate in the cellular processes involved in root hair initiation and elongation (also see the diagram in Fig 12).
Above the promoter region, arrows indicate promotion, and perpendicular lines indicate inhibition.
Root hair initiation and subsequent elongation involves polarized cell growth or tip growth that depends on a variety of highly coordinated cellular activities [55,56]. These activities involve the action of cell wall proteins, peroxidases, xyloglucan endotransglucosylases, H+-ATPases, and pectin modification enzymes. In Arabidopsis, these cell wall proteins and cell wall modification enzymes are encoded by multigene families. To provide a precise mechanism for the morphogenetic control of root hair development, plants must selectively activate a subset of these genes in root hair cells. However, which specific isoforms of the proteins encoded by these genes are involved in root hair development remain largely unknown. Among the 61 genes that are upregulated in hps5 relative to the WT under Pi-sufficient conditions, 13 genes had been demonstrated to be involved in root hair development before this work. The co-upregulation of other genes in hps5, which have similar biochemical functions or root hair-specific expression patterns as those 13 genes, suggested that they might also participate in root hair development. These other genes include five RHS genes (RHS12, a pectinesterase; RHS13, an extensin-like protein; RHS14, a pectate lyase; RHS15, a glycerol-3-phosphate permease; and RHS19, a peroxidase), a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase (XTH12), two other peroxidases (PER13a and At3g49960), nine cell wall proteins (PRP1, PRP3, FLA6, AGP3, EXT2, EXT10, EXT12, EXT13, and EXT15), and one pectin methytransferase inhibitor. Another interesting group of upregulated genes in hps5 encode five proteins involved in JA biosynthesis and signaling. JA biosynthesis is essential for ethylene-induced root hair formation . Thus, ethylene might regulate root hair development also by altering JA biosynthesis and signaling through the induction of these five genes. The similar co-expression patterns of these genes have also been reported in two other independent studies [32,35]. When we examined the root hair phenotypes of the T-DNA insertion lines for 14 putative root hair-related genes and overexpressing lines of RHS15 and RHS19 (Fig 9), we found that the T-DNA lines for six genes had defects in root hair development. This further supported our inference that these co-expressed genes might also be involved in root hair growth. The lack of root hair phenotypes of the T-DNA lines for the other eight genes might be due to the functional redundancy of genes belonging to the same family or to the involvement of those genes in other aspects of root development, such as primary and lateral root development. In summary, the analyses of the transcriptomic data of hps5 allowed us to identify the genes encoding the specific isoforms of the cell wall proteins and cell wall modification enzymes involved in the root hair development, including those that have been demonstrated before and new genes discovered in this research.
Because both hps5 and Pi-deficient plants accumulate high levels of EIN3 protein (Fig 6), we wondered whether EIN3 and its closest homolog EIL1 are directly involved in Pi starvation-induced root hair development. Our RNA-seq analyses of ein3 and ein3eil1 mutants indicate that, among the 61 upregulated genes in hps5 relative to the WT, 43 are also induced by Pi starvation. The induction of 37 of these 43 genes by Pi starvation is partially or completely suppressed in ein3 and ein3eil1 mutants (Fig 8). In contrast, their expression is greatly elevated in the EIN3 OX lines (based on the analysis of eight randomly selected genes). These promoter of these eight genes all contain putative EIN3-binding elements (S17 Fig). Moreover, our ChIP and EMSA assays further demonstrated that EIN3 can bind to the promoter of these genes (Figs 10 and 11). Together, these results provide compelling evidence that these genes are the direct targets of EIN3.
RSL4 is a key positive regulator of root hair development  and acts downstream of GL2 and RHD6. Eighty-three putative direct targets of RSL4 have been identified, including those that function in cell wall modifications. Interestingly, we found that among these 83 putative targets, 19 might also be the direct targets of EIN3 (Table 1). These results indicate that EIN3 and RSL4 bind to the promoters of a subset of the same target genes involved in cell wall modifications. RSL2, a close relative of RSL4, also acts downstream of RHD6 in regulating root hair development . We speculate that EIN3 may also share some targets with RSL2.
In Fig 12, we describe a working model for how ethylene mediates Pi starvation-induced root hair development. We propose that the level of ethylene in root cells is low under normal growth conditions. A group of key transcription factors, including RSL4 and its close relatives (RSL1, RSL2, LRL1, and LRL2) , trigger basal level transcription of their target genes to promote root hair initiation and elongation by regulating a variety of cellular activities, such as cell wall modifications (Fig 12). Pi starvation increases the levels of EIN3 proteins in root cells through both enhanced ethylene biosynthesis and protein stability of EIN3. These EIN3 proteins can bypass RHD6 and directly bind to the promoters of the genes targeted by RSL4, RSL2, and probably other transcription factors. At same time, the level of RSL4 proteins is also enhanced by Pi starvation. Thus, elevated levels of EIN3 and RSL4 increase the transcription of these genes, resulting in enhanced root hair production. Ethylene has also been reported to mediate root hair growth induced by other stresses, such as iron and boron deficiencies [58,59], bacterial infection , mechanical impedance , local water stress , and elevated levels of carbon monoxide . Therefore, our working model may provide a general mechanism of how ethylene mediates root hair responses to other stress signals as well.
Our working model is also consistent with previous observations about the effect of ethylene on root hair development under normal growth conditions. Under such conditions, the blocking of ethylene signaling by either an inhibitor of ethylene perception or by mutations in some key components of the ethylene signaling pathway has only a minor effect on root hair initiation and elongation ([12,17,62] and this study). Root hair density and root hair length can be dramatically increased, however, by exogenously applied ACC, by mutations resulting in constitutive ethylene responses (the ctr1 mutant) or ethylene overproduction (the eto1 mutant), or by overexpression of EIN3 [12,15,16,62]. In these plants, the increase of root hair density can be partly attributed to the ectopically formed root hairs (the root hairs formed in the position of non-hair cells). In addition, ethylene has been shown to act downstream or in separate pathway of RHD6 . According to our working model, this is because the contribution of EIN3 to the transcription of the genes involved in cellular processes related to root hair development is relatively low under normal growth conditions. In ACC-treated plants, in mutants with constitutive ethylene response or ethylene overproduction, and in the EIN3-overexpressing line, however, the levels of EIN3 proteins in both the hair cells and non-hair cells are dramatically increased. These EIN3 proteins bypass RHD6 to directly bind to the promoters of the RSL4- and RSL2-targeted genes, resulting in a great increase in root hair density and root hair length, including the formation of root hairs in non-hair cells.
Finally, we note that hps5 will also be very useful for the study of ethylene receptor function. In Arabidopsis, there are five ethylene receptors that negatively regulate ethylene signaling. ETR1 and ERS1 belong to the same subgroup in this family. Because of the functional redundancy among these five receptors, a loss-of-function mutation in one receptor does not cause any phenotype . A gain-of-function point mutation, in contrast, can make plants insensitive to ethylene because of a dominant-negative effect [22, 28]. To date, no mutants with a single point mutation in any ethylene receptors have been reported to have constitutive ethylene responses. Previously, all reported point mutations that cause plants to be insensitive to ethylene occur in the receptor’s transmembrane domains. The mutated proline residue in hps5, however, is located immediately after the transmembrane domain III (Fig 2A). Therefore, we believe that the sequence of the cytoplasmic region immediately behind the transmembrane domain III is critical for the function of ERS1. The phenotypic analyses of hps5 and the transgenic plants expressing the mutated ERS gene suggest that this region is involved in the protein-protein interactions between ERS1 and other receptors or in self interactions. Further study of the structural–functional relationship of this conserved proline residue in ERS1 may provide new insights into the function of ethylene receptors.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials and growth conditions
All plants used in this study were of the Columbia ecotype background. The SALK T-DNA insertional lines were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC). The primers used to confirm the insertion of the T-DNA lines are listed in S5 Table. The Pi-sufficient (P+) medium was half-strength MS medium with 1% (w/v) sucrose and 1.2% (w/v) agar (Sigma catalogue no. A1296). In the Pi-deficient (P-) medium, the 1.25 mM KH2PO4 in the P+ medium was replaced with 0.65 mM K2SO4. The Arabidopsis seeds were surface sterilized with 20% (v/v) bleach for 15 min. After three washes in sterile-distilled water, seeds were sown on Petri plates containing P+ or P- medium. After the seeds were stratified at 4°C for 2 days, the agar plates were placed vertically in a growth room with a photoperiod of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness at 22–24°C. The light intensity was 100 μmol m -2s -1.
About 100,000 M2 seeds representing 6,000 EMS-mutagenized M1 plant lines were used for mutant screening. The EMS-mutagenized lines were generated according to . Seeds were plated on P- medium and were grown in the growth room for 7 d. The root hair phenotypes were visually examined under a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZ61, Japan). The seedlings that had enhanced root hair production compared to the WT were identified as putative mutants and were transferred to soil. The plants were self-pollinated, and the mutant phenotypes were confirmed in the next generation. The mutants were back-crossed to the WT plants twice before they were characterized further.
Quantitative analysis of APase activity
Root surface-associated and total APase activities were quantified as described by .
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis
Total RNAs were extract from 7-day-old seedlings with the TIANGEN RNAprep pure plant kit. A 2-μg quantity of RNA was reverse transcribed in a 50-μl reaction using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s manual. cDNA was amplified with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa) on the Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR detection system. ACTIN2 gene expression was used as an internal control, and the relative expression level of each gene was calculated by the 2–△△Ct method. The genes and the primers used to detect their mRNA expression are listed in S7 Table.
Quantitative analysis of cellular Pi and total P contents
Cellular Pi and total P were quantified as described by .
Analysis of anthocyanin accumulation
For analysis of anthocyanin accumulation, the seeds were sown directly on 1/2 MS agar plates (0.6% agar) with different levels of Pi and were placed horizontally in the growth room. The shoots of the seedlings were photographed at 10 DAG using a camera attached to a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZ61, Japan).
Genetic mapping of the HPS5 gene
The mapping population was generated by crossing the mutant hps5 to a plant of the Landsberg erecta ecotype. F2 progeny that displayed the dark-blue BCIP staining phenotype were selected, and DNAs from these seedlings were isolated for molecular mapping. A set of simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) and cleaved-amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers was used to map the HPS5 gene. The sequences and chromosomal positions of the molecular markers are listed in S8 Table.
Treatment of the ethylene precursor
For the test of triple responses, seeds were sown directly on P+ medium (0.6% agar) containing 1 μM ACC. After the seeds were stratified at 4°C for 3 days, they were placed horizontally in growth room at 22°C in the dark. After 96 h, the seedlings were photographed and the length of hypocotyl was measured. At least 20 seedlings (n> 20) were scored for each measurement.
For observation of the accumulation of EIN3-GFP proteins, seeds were first germinated on P+ medium (1.2% agar) and grown for 4 days. The seedlings were then transferred to P+ and P- media with or without 10 μM ACC. After 6 days on these media, the roots were excised from the seedlings and were examined with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM710, Germany). Excitation wavelengths of 488 nm and emission wavelengths of 507 nm were used to visualize GFP signals.
Generation of transgenic plants
To generate the plant transformation vector 35S::ERS1 for genetic complementation, the genomic sequence of the ERS1 gene was amplified from genomic DNA of WT Arabidopsis plants using primers 5’-AGAACACGGGGGACTCTAGAGGATCCATTGGTTTCTTCTTTATCACAC-3’ and 5’-TTGAACGATCGGGGAAATTCGAGCTCGAATCTGCCACAACCACA-3’.
The ERS1 genomic DNA was cloned into the site after the CaMV 35S promoter of the plant expression vector pZH01, which carries a hygromycin-resistant gene. To generate the vector ERS1::ERS1, the promoter and genomic DNA sequences of AtERS1 were amplified from WT Arabidopsis plants using primers 5'- TCTAGAGGCTAAGAAGTCCGAGAGTA -3' and 5'-CCCGGGGAATCTGCCACAACCACA-3'. The PCR products were cloned into the vector pBI101, which carries a kanamycin-resistant gene. For the vector 35S:: mERS1, genomic sequences of mutated ERS1 were amplified from the hps5 mutant using the same primers that were used for vector 35S::ERS1. These constructs were then transformed into the hps5 mutant plants (35S::ERS1 and ERS1::ERS1) and WT plants (35S:: mERS1) by the floral dip method.
To generate the vector EXPA7::RHS15 and EXPA7::RHS19, the CaMV 35S promoter of the plant expression vector pZH01 was replaced by the EXPA7 promoter sequences. The genomic DNA sequences of RHS15 and RHS15 were amplified from WT Arabidopsis plants using primers of RHS15-F 5'- AAGAGGCTAGAATGGGATCC CACCATTGTAGTTGAAGAAC -3', RHS15-R 5'- CGATCGGGGAAATTCGAGCTCAGGTAATCTTATTCTCATTC -3', RHS19-F 5'- AAGAGGCTAGAATGGGATCC ACCATTCCTGTAAACACAAA -3', and RHS19-R 5'- GATCGGGGAAATTCGAGCTCGGATTTATTAAACAAGTTTA -3'. The PCR products were cloned into the modified pZH01 vector.
For all of the constructions, the PCR-amplified gene fragments were directly ligated to the plant transformation vector as described in .
Protein extraction and western blots
The 7-d-old Seedlings were ground to fine powders in liquid nitrogen. One volume of ice-cold extraction buffer (0.1 M K-acetate, 20 mM CaCl2, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20% glycerol (v/v), pH 5.4) was added to the powders. Samples were gently agitated on ice for 0.5 h and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube, and the centrifugation was repeated. About 30 μg of denatured protein was separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 43 mM glycine, 20% methanol) and subjected to western blot analysis using anti-EIN3 antibodies as described in .
The RNA-seq analyses were performed at the Core Sequencing Facility of Tsinghua University. Total RNAs were isolated from 7-d-old seedlings using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Poly(A+) RNAs were purified using the Next Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England BioLabs) and were reversely transcribed into cDNAs using M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase and Next® mRNA Second Strand Synthesis Module (New England BioLabs). The cDNAs were fragmented and sequencing libraries were prepared by end repairing, “A” tail addition, and adaptor ligation. The libraries were sequenced as 50-mers using HiSeq2500 (Illumina) with standard settings.
The bioinformatics analyses of the sequencing data were essentially carried out as described in . The raw data of Illumina reads are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive browser (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra; accession no. SRP071563).
ChIP-qPCR assays were performed as described by . A 2-g quantity of 10-d-old 35S::EIN3-GFP seedlings was used for ChIP assays. The chromatins were precipitated using GFP-Trap A beads. The enriched DNA fragments were released by 200 μM NaCl and subjected to qPCR analysis. The primers used for ChIP-qPCR assays are listed in S9 Table.
To construct a plasmid for the expression of recombinant EIN3 protein (amino acids 141 to 352) in E. coli cells, the corresponding DNA fragment was amplified by PCR using primers 5’-ACTGGATCCAAGGTTAGGTTTGATCGT- 3’ and 5’-ACTCTCGAGTCAGAAGAATTCATAACTTTT- 3’. The PCR-amplified fragment was inserted into BamHI and XhoI sites of the pGEX-6p-1 vector (Pharmacia). The biotin-labeled probes of the promoter sequences were generated by annealing the biotin-labeled complementary oligonucleotides. The sequences of various DNA probes are listed in S6 Table. Each binding reaction (20 μL) contained 0.1 μg of recombinant protein, 20 fM of labeled DNA probe, and 1 μg of poly(dI-dC) in buffer (25 mM HEPES-potassium hydroxide, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% [v/v] glycerol, 1 mM DTT); binding reactions were performed at room temperature for 30 min. The binding reaction products were resolved on 5.5% polyacrylamide gels run in 0.5X Tris-borate-EDTA. The free and protein-bound DNAs were detected using the Light Shift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Primary root length of 7-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings (A) and lateral root density of 9-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings (B).
S2 Fig. APase activities of the WT and the hps5 mutant.
(A), APase activity detected by BCIP staining on the root surfaces of 7-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings grown on P+ and P–media. (B), Quantitative measurement of root-associated APase activity of the seedlings shown in (A). Values represent the mean and SD of three replicates. Means with asterisks are significantly different from the WT (P < 0.05, t-test).
S3 Fig. Relative expression of eight Pi starvation-induced genes in 7-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings grown on P+ and P- media as determined by qPCR.
The expression level for each gene in the WT under P+ condition was set to 1.0. Values are the means and SD of three biological replicates and represent fold changes normalized to transcript levels of the WT on P+ medium. Means with asterisks are significantly different from the WT (P < 0.05, t-test).
S4 Fig. Anthocyanin accumulation in the WT and the hps5 mutant grown on P+, P-, and P- medium supplemented with different amounts of Pi as indicated on the top.
The pictures were taken 10 days after seed germination.
Cellular Pi contents (A) and total phosphorus (B) in 9-day-old WT and hps5 seedlings grown on P+ and P–medium.
S6 Fig. The strategy for fine mapping of the HPS5 gene.
The molecular markers used in the fine mapping are shown above the horizontal lines. The numbers below each horizontal line are the AGI coordinates on the chromosome. Distance unit: Mb. The position of the mutation is indicated at the bottom.
S7 Fig. Alignment of a part of protein sequences of ERS1 and its orthologs in other plant species.
The alignment was generated using CLUSTAL program (Higgins et al. 1996). Identical and similar amino acids among the different plant species are highlighted with black and grey background, respectively. Numbers at the left indicate the positions of amino acid residues. Red box indicates the conserved amino acids which is mutated in hps5.
S8 Fig. Genetic complementation of the HPS5 gene in term of root-associated APase activity.
(A), BCIP staining of root-associated APase activity in 7-day-old seedlings of WT, hps5, and two complementation lines (ERS1::ERS1 and 35S::ERS1) grown on P+ and P- media. (B), A close view of the roots of the seedlings shown in (A).
S9 Fig. Morphology of 25-day-old WT and hps5 plants grown in soil.
S10 Fig. Relative expression levels of the ERS1 gene in the 7-day-old seedlings of the WT, hps5, and six 35S::mERS1 transgenic lines grown under P+ and P- conditions determined by qPCR.
S11 Fig. Primary root length in 7-day-old seedlings of the WT, hps5, and six 35S::mERS1 transgenic lines grown under P+ and P- conditions.
S12 Fig. Root-associated APase activity of various plant lines.
(A), BCIP staining of root-associated APase activity of 7-day-old seedlings of the WT, hps5, and six 35S::mERS1 transgenic lines grown under P+ and P- conditions. (B), A close view of the root-associated APase activity of the seedlings shown in (A).
S13 Fig. Relative expression level of EIN3 in roots of 7-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown under various conditions as determined by qPCR.
(A), WT and hps5 seedlings grown on P+ and P- medium; (B) WT seedlings grown on P+ and P- medium in the absence and presence of 10 μM ACC. The expression level in the WT under the P+ condition was set to 1.0. Values are the means and SD of three biological replicates and represent fold-changes normalized to transcript levels of the WT on P+ medium. t-tests were performed to test the significance.
S14 Fig. Relative expression of six selected genes in 7-day-old P+, P- WT, and P+ hps5 seedlings as determined by qPCR.
S15 Fig. Relative expression of six selected genes in 7-day-old WT seedlings grown on P+ and P- media and ein3 and ein3eil1 seedlings grown on P- medium determined by qPCR.
S16 Fig. Identification of knock-out mutants and overexpression plants for RHS15 and RHS19.
(A) Diagrams showing the positions of the T-DNA in the RHS15 and RHS19 gene. Black box: exons; grey box: 5’ and 3’ UTRs; thin line: introns; thick line: flanking sequences surrounding the gene. Relative expression of RHS15 (B) and RHS19 (C) in the 7-day-old seedlings of their corresponding T-DNA insertion lines and overexpressing lines as determined by qPCR. The name of SALK lines for each allele of rhs15 and rhs19 are as follows. rhs15-1: SALK_015573; rhs15-2: SALK_015669; rhs15-3: SALK_117952. rhs19-1: SALK_093852; rhs19-2: SALK_010873; rhs19-3: SALK_020724.
S17 Fig. Schematic diagrams showing the relative positions of the putative EIN3-binding sites (black boxes) in the promoters of 12 upregulated genes in P+ hps5.
The 1.5 kb upstream sequences are shown, and the translational start sites (ATG) are shown at position +1. Arrows indicates the primers used for ChIP assays. The asterisks indicated the binding sites that is bound by EIN3 proteins.
S18 Fig. Relative expression of RSL4 in 7-day-old WT seedlings grown on P+ and P- medium in the absence or presence of 10 μM ACC determined by qPCR.
S1 Table. The up- and down-regulated transcripts in P- WT compared to P+ WT.
S2 Table. The up- and down-regulated transcripts in P+ hps5 compared to P+ WT.
S3 Table. The downregulated transcripts in P- ein3 compared to P- WT.
S4 Table. The downregulated transcripts in P- ein3eil1 compared to P- WT.
S5 Table. The sequences of the primers used for genotyping of the T-DNA lines.
S6 Table. The sequences of the DNA probes used in EMSA.
S7 Table. The sequences of the primers used for qPCR analyses.
S8 Table. The sequences of the molecular markers used for molecular mapping.
S9 Table. The sequences of the primers used for ChIP-qPCR analyses.
We thank the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center for providing T-DNA insertional lines and Dr. Hongwei Guo for providing ein3 and ein3eil mutant lines, 35S::EIN3 and 35S::EIN3-GFP lines, and EIN3 antibodies. We also thank Ms. Jianhuo Fang for assistance in RNA-seq experiments.
Conceived and designed the experiments: LS DL. Performed the experiments: LS JD XC. Analyzed the data: LS HY YJ DL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LS HY JD XC. Wrote the paper: LS DL.
- 1. Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, et al. Phosphate import in plants: focus on the PHT1 transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2:83. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00083 pmid:22645553.
- 2. Chiou TJ, Lin SI. Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62:185–206. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103849 pmid:21370979.
- 3. Yuan H, Liu D. Signaling components involved in plant responses to phosphate starvation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50(7):849–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00709.x pmid:18713395.
- 4. Lopez-Arredondo DL, Leyva-Gonzalez MA, Gonzalez-Morales SI, Lopez-Bucio J, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphate nutrition: improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:95–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949 pmid:24579991.
- 5. Gilroy S, Jones DL. Through form to function: root hair development and nutrient uptake. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5(2):56–60. pmid:10664614.
- 6. Gahoonia TS, Nielsen NE. Direct evidence on participation of root hairs in phosphorus (P-32) uptake from soil. Plant Soil. 1998;198(2):147–52. doi: 10.1023/A:1004346412006.
- 7. Bates TR, Lynch JP. Stimulation of root hair elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by low phosphorus availability. Plant Cell and Environment. 1996;19(5):529–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00386.x.
- 8. Bates TR, Lynch JP. Plant growth and phosphorus accumulation of wild type and two root hair mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot. 2000;87(7):958–63. pmid:10898772.
- 9. Yan XL, Liao H, Beebe SE, Blair MW, Lynch JP. QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant Soil. 2004;265(1–2):17–29. doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-0693-1.
- 10. Bates TR, Lynch JP. The efficiency of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) root hairs in phosphorus acquisition. Am J Bot. 2000;87(7):964–70. pmid:10898773.
- 11. Ma Z, Bielenberg D, Brown K, Lynch J. Regulation of root hair density by phosphorus availability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant, Cell Environ. 2001;24(4):459–67.
- 12. Zhang YJ, Lynch JP, Brown KM. Ethylene and phosphorus availability have interacting yet distinct effects on root hair development. J Exp Bot. 2003;54(391):2351–61. pmid:12947049.
- 13. Song L, Liu D. Ethylene and plant responses to phosphate deficiency. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6. ARTN 796 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00796 pmid:26483813.
- 14. Ji Y, Guo H. From endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to nucleus: EIN2 bridges the gap in ethylene signaling. Mol Plant. 2013;6(1):11–4. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss150. pmid:23239828
- 15. Pitts RJ, Cernac A, Estelle M. Auxin and ethylene promote root hair elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1998;16(5):553–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00321.x pmid:10036773.
- 16. Tanimoto M, Roberts K, Dolan L. Ethylene is a positive regulator of root hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1995;8(6):943–8. pmid:8580964.
- 17. Masucci JD, Schiefelbein JW. Hormones act downstream of TTG and GL2 to promote root hair outgrowth during epidermis development in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell. 1996;8(9):1505–17. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.9.1505 pmid:8837505.
- 18. Tian J, Liao H. The role of intracellular and secreted purple acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus scavenging and recycling. In Plaxton WC, Lambers H, editors. Phosphorus metabolism in plants. Annual Plant Reviews 48. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. pp.265–288. doi: 10.1002/9781118958841.ch10.
- 19. Wang L, Li Z, Qian W, Guo W, Gao X, Huang L, et al. The Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatase AtPAP10 is predominantly associated with the root surface and plays an important role in plant tolerance to phosphate limitation. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(3):1283–99. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.183723 pmid:21941000.
- 20. Yu H, Luo N, Sun L, Liu D. HPS4/SABRE regulates plant responses to phosphate starvation through antagonistic interaction with ethylene signalling. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(12):4527–38. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers131 pmid:22615140.
- 21. Sakai H, Hua J, Chen QG, Chang C, Medrano LJ, Bleecker AB, et al. ETR2 is an ETR1-like gene involved in ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(10): 5812–17. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5812 pmid:9576967.
- 22. Rodriguez FI, Esch JJ, Hall AE, Binder BM, Schaller GE, Bleecker AB. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;283(5404): 996–8. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5404.996 pmid:9974395.
- 23. Guzman P, Ecker JR. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell. 1990;2(6):513–23. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.513 pmid:2152173.
- 24. Alonso JM, Hirayama T, Roman G, Nourizadeh S, Ecker JR. EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;284(5423):2148–52. pmid:10381874.
- 25. Kieber JJ, Rothenberg M, Roman G, Feldmann KA, Ecker JR. CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the raf family of protein kinases. Cell. 1993;72(3):427–41. pmid:8431946.
- 26. Guo H, Ecker JR. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell. 2003;115(6):667–77. pmid:14675532.
- 27. Hua J, Meyerowitz EM. Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 1998;94(2):261–71. pmid:9695954.
- 28. Hua J, Sakai H, Nourizadeh S, Chen QG, Bleecker AB, Ecker JR, et al. EIN4 and ERS2 are members of the putative ethylene receptor gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10(8):1321–32. pmid:9707532.
- 29. Won SK, Lee YJ, Lee HY, Heo YK, Cho M, Cho HT. Cis-element- and transcriptome-based screening of root hair-specific genes and their functional characterization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009;150(3):1459–73. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.140905 pmid:19448035.
- 30. Becnel J, Natarajan M, Kipp A, Braam J. Developmental expression patterns of Arabidopsis XTH genes reported by transgenes and Genevestigator. Plant Mol Biol. 2006;61(3):451–67. doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-0021-z pmid:16830179.
- 31. Maris A, Suslov D, Fry SC, Verbelen JP, Vissenberg K. Enzymic characterization of two recombinant xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) proteins of Arabidopsis and their effect on root growth and cell wall extension. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(13):3959–72. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp229 pmid:19635745.
- 32. Velasquez SM, Ricardi MM, Dorosz JG, Fernandez PV, Nadra AD, Pol-Fachin L, et al. O-glycosylated cell wall proteins are essential in root hair growth. Science. 2011;332(6036):1401–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1206657 pmid:21680836.
- 33. Baumberger N, Steiner M, Ryser U, Keller B, Ringli C. Synergistic interaction of the two paralogous Arabidopsis genes LRX1 and LRX2 in cell wall formation during root hair development. Plant J. 2003;35(1):71–81. pmid:12834403.
- 34. Bernhardt C, Tierney ML. Expression of AtPRP3, a proline-rich structural cell wall protein from Arabidopsis, is regulated by cell-type-specific developmental pathways involved in root hair formation. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(3):705–14. pmid:10712533.
- 35. Bruex A, Kainkaryam RM, Wieckowski Y, Kang YH, Bernhardt C, Xia Y, et al. A gene regulatory network for root epidermis cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(1):e1002446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002446 pmid:22253603.
- 36. Grierson CS, Roberts K, Feldmann KA, Dolan L. The COW1 locus of Arabidopsis acts after RHD2, and in parallel with RHD3 and TIP1, to determine the shape, rate of elongation, and number of root hairs produced from each site of hair formation. Plant Physiol. 1997;115(3):981–90. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.3.981 pmid:9390433.
- 37. Huang J, Kim CM, Xuan YH, Park SJ, Piao HL, Je BI, et al. OsSNDP1, a Sec14-nodulin domain-containing protein, plays a critical role in root hair elongation in rice. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;82(1–2):39–50. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0033-4 pmid:23456248.
- 38. Santi S, Schmidt W. Dissecting iron deficiency-induced proton extrusion in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytol. 2009;183(4):1072–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02908.x pmid:19549134.
- 39. Bibikova TN, Jacob T, Dahse I, Gilroy S. Localized changes in apoplastic and cytoplasmic pH are associated with root hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1998;125(15):2925–34. pmid:9655814.
- 40. Hu Y, Poh HM, Chua NH. The Arabidopsis ARGOS-LIKE gene regulates cell expansion during organ growth. Plant J. 2006;47(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02750.x pmid:16824178.
- 41. Yang W, Devaiah SP, Pan X, Isaac G, Welti R, Wang X. AtPLAI is an acyl hydrolase involved in basal jasmonic acid production and Arabidopsis resistance to Botrytis cinerea. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(25):18116–28. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700405200 pmid:17475618.
- 42. Yamashino T, Kitayama M, Mizuno T. Transcription of ST2A encoding a sulfotransferase family protein that is involved in jasmonic acid metabolism is controlled according to the circadian clock- and PIF4/PIF5-mediated external coincidence mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77(12):2454–60. doi: 10.1271/bbb.130559 pmid:24317064.
- 43. Seltmann MA, Stingl NE, Lautenschlaeger JK, Krischke M, Mueller MJ, Berger S. Differential impact of lipoxygenase 2 and jasmonates on natural and stress-induced senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010;152(4):1940–50. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.153114 pmid:20190093.
- 44. Pauwels L, Goossens A. Fine-tuning of early events in the jasmonate response. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3(10):846–7. pmid:20140232.
- 45. Pré M, Atallah M, Champion A, De Vos M, Pieterse CM, Memelink J. The AP2/ERF domain transcription factor ORA59 integrates jasmonic acid and ethylene signals in plant defense. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(3):1347–57. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.117523 pmid:18467450.
- 46. Showalter AM, Keppler B, Lichtenberg J, Gu D, Welch LR. A bioinformatics approach to the identification, classification, and analysis of hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):485–513. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.156554. pmid:20395450
- 47. Kim DW, Lee SH, Choi SB, Won SK, Heo YK, Cho M, et al. Functional conservation of a root hair cell-specific cis-element in angiosperms with different root hair distribution patterns. Plant Cell. 2006;18(11):2958–70. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.045229 pmid:17098810.
- 48. Kosugi S, Ohashi Y. Cloning and DNA-binding properties of a tobacco Ethylene-Insensitive3 (EIN3) homolog. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(4):960–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.4.960 pmid:10648789.
- 49. Yi K, Menand B, Bell E, Dolan L. A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor controls cell growth and size in root hairs. Nat Genet. 2010;42(3):264–7. doi: 10.1038/ng.529 pmid:20139979.
- 50. Lei M, Zhu C, Liu Y, Karthikeyan AS, Bressan RA, Raghothama KG, et al. Ethylene signalling is involved in regulation of phosphate starvation‐induced gene expression and production of acid phosphatases and anthocyanin in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2011;189(4):1084–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03555.x. pmid:21118263
- 51. Wang L, Dong J, Gao Z, Liu D. The Arabidopsis gene hypersensitive to phosphate starvation 3 encodes ethylene overproduction 1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53(6):1093–105. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs072 pmid:22623414.
- 52. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME Jr. Ethylene in plant biology: Academic press; 1992.
- 53. Lin Q, Ohashi Y, Kato M, Tsuge T, Gu H, Qu L et al. GLABRA2 directly suppresses basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor genes with diverse functions in root hair development. Plant Cell. 2015;27:2894–2906. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00607 pmid:26486447.
- 54. Schiefelbein J, Huang L, Zheng XH. Regulation of epidermal cell fate in Arabidopsis roots: the importance of multiple feedback loops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5. ARTN 47 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00047 pmid:24596575.
- 55. Cosgrove DJ. Plant cell wall extensibility: connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall-modifying enzymes. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(2):463–76. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv511 pmid:26608646.
- 56. Darley CP, Forrester AM, McQueen-Mason SJ. The molecular basis for plant cell wall extension. Plant Mol Biol. 2001; 47(1–2):179–195. pmid:11554471.
- 57. Zhu C, Gan L, Shen Z, Xia K. Interactions between jasmonates and ethylene in the regulation of root hair development in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(6):1299–308. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj103 pmid:16531464.
- 58. Gonzalez-Fontes A, Herrera-Rodriguez MB, Martin-Rejano EM, Navarro-Gochicoa MT, Rexach J, Camacho-Cristobal JJ. Root responses to boron deficiency mediated by ethylene. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;6. ARTN 1 doi: 10310.3389/fpls.2015.01103 pmid:26779202.
- 59. Schmidt W, Schikora A. Different pathways are involved in phosphate and iron stress-induced alterations of root epidermal cell development. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(4):2078–84. pmid:11299387.
- 60. Galland M, Gamet L, Varoquaux F, Touraine B, Touraine B, Desbrosses G. The ethylene pathway contributes to root hair elongation induced by the beneficial bacteria Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196. Plant Sci. 2012;190:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.03.008 pmid:22608521.
- 61. Okamoto T, Tsurumi S, Shibasaki K, Obana Y, Takaji H, Oono Y, et al. Genetic dissection of hormonal responses in the roots of Arabidopsis grown under continuous mechanical impedance. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(4):1651–62. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.115519 pmid:18287488.
- 62. Cho HT, Cosgrove DJ. Regulation of root hair initiation and expansin gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002;14(12):3237–53. pmid:12468740.
- 63. Guo K, Kong WW, Yang ZM. Carbon monoxide promotes root hair development in tomato. Plant Cell and Environment. 2009;32(8):1033–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01986.x pmid:19344331.
- 64. Weigel D, Glazebrook J. Arabidopsis: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2002. pp.24–36.
- 65. Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, HutchisonIII CA, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods.2009;6(5):343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318 pmid:19363495.
- 66. Kang J, Yu H, Tian C, Zhou W, Li C, Jiao Y et al. Suppression of photosynthetic gene expression in roots is required for sustained root growth under phosphate deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(3):1156–1170. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.238725 pmid:24868033.
- 67. Gendrel AV, Lippman Z, Martienssen R, Colot V. Profiling histone modification patterns in plants using genomic tiling microarrays. Nat Methods. 2005; 2(3):213–218. pmid:16163802.