• Loading metrics

Myosin Vb Mediated Plasma Membrane Homeostasis Regulates Peridermal Cell Size and Maintains Tissue Homeostasis in the Zebrafish Epidermis

  • Sonal ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sonal, Jaydeep Sidhaye

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    Current address: Dept. Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany

  • Jaydeep Sidhaye ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sonal, Jaydeep Sidhaye

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    Current address: Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany

  • Mandar Phatak ,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    MP, SB, AM, and OD also contributed equally to this work.

  • Shamik Banerjee ,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    MP, SB, AM, and OD also contributed equally to this work.

  • Aditya Mulay ,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    MP, SB, AM, and OD also contributed equally to this work.

  • Ojas Deshpande ,

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

    Current address: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Cell Cycle Regulation Laboratory, Oeiras, Portugal

    MP, SB, AM, and OD also contributed equally to this work.

  • Sourabh Bhide,

    Affiliation: Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India

  • Tressa Jacob,

    Affiliation: Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India

  • Ines Gehring,

    Affiliation: Department of Genetics, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany

  • Christiane Nuesslein-Volhard,

    Affiliation: Department of Genetics, Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany

  • Mahendra Sonawane

    Affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Mumbai, India

Myosin Vb Mediated Plasma Membrane Homeostasis Regulates Peridermal Cell Size and Maintains Tissue Homeostasis in the Zebrafish Epidermis

  • Sonal, 
  • Jaydeep Sidhaye, 
  • Mandar Phatak, 
  • Shamik Banerjee, 
  • Aditya Mulay, 
  • Ojas Deshpande, 
  • Sourabh Bhide, 
  • Tressa Jacob, 
  • Ines Gehring, 
  • Christiane Nuesslein-Volhard


The epidermis is a stratified epithelium, which forms a barrier to maintain the internal milieu in metazoans. Being the outermost tissue, growth of the epidermis has to be strictly coordinated with the growth of the embryo. The key parameters that determine tissue growth are cell number and cell size. So far, it has remained unclear how the size of epidermal cells is maintained and whether it contributes towards epidermal homeostasis. We have used genetic analysis in combination with cellular imaging to show that zebrafish goosepimples/myosin Vb regulates plasma membrane homeostasis and is involved in maintenance of cell size in the periderm, the outermost epidermal layer. The decrease in peridermal cell size in Myosin Vb deficient embryos is compensated by an increase in cell number whereas decrease in cell number results in the expansion of peridermal cells, which requires myosin Vb (myoVb) function. Inhibition of cell proliferation as well as cell size expansion results in increased lethality in larval stages suggesting that this two-way compensatory mechanism is essential for growing larvae. Our analyses unravel the importance of Myosin Vb dependent cell size regulation in epidermal homeostasis and demonstrate that the epidermis has the ability to maintain a dynamic balance between cell size and cell number.

Author Summary

The epidermis is the outermost epithelial component of the vertebrate skin. It functions as an effective barrier against pathogens and prevents loss of body fluids to the surrounding environment. The factors involved in the maintenance of epidermal architecture have been under intense investigation since the last two decades. Here we report that zebrafish Myosin Vb, a molecular motor, which transports various cargoes inside epithelial cells, is involved in the maintenance of cell size in the outermost epidermal layer called periderm. We show that in the absence of myosin Vb function there is perturbed membrane transport and an increase in degradation of membrane components leading to cell shrinkage in the myosin Vb mutant. The epidermis compensates for this decrease in cell size, which may compromise epidermal integrity, by increasing the cell number. We also show that in the absence of cell proliferation, the cell size increases to compensate for the decrease in cell number. Simultaneous reduction in cell proliferation as well as cell size results in death of the embryos. Thus, our analyses unravel previously unknown compensatory mechanisms that exist in the epidermis to maintain the tissue integrity.


The epidermis, the outer-most stratified epithelium in metazoans, performs essential functions such as maintenance of body fluids and protection against pathogenic invasion. The epidermis develops from mono-layered non-neural ectoderm during embryogenesis. Initially, it is a bi-layered tissue consisting of the inner basal epidermis and the outer periderm. In mammals, the periderm develops from the basal cells which migrate outwards during early development [1], [2]. In zebrafish the outermost embryonic epithelium, called the enveloping layer, gives rise to the periderm [3]. Tight junctions are an integral part of peridermal cells and contribute to the barrier function [1], [4], [5]. Thus, this early bi-layered epidermis may help in maintaining the interior milieu of the growing vertebrate embryos. The epidermis remains bi-layered during embryonic development in most vertebrates studied. It becomes multilayered before birth in amniotes, including humans, and during metamorphosis in fishes and frog [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

Being the outermost cover, growth of the epidermis must coordinate with the changes in size and shape of the growing embryo. The tissue growth is achieved either by increase in cell number or cell size or both. The importance of cell number in epidermis development is underscored by the studies done in p63 knockout mice and zebrafish p63 deficient larvae. The loss of p63 function, which is essential for the maintenance of stem cells in stratified epithelia, results in paucity of epidermal cells leading to thinner epidermis in mice and loss of tissue integrity in zebrafish [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. So far, there is no report on how cell size is maintained in the epidermis, nor how cell size contributes to the maintenance of epidermal homeostasis during development.

Membrane transport is intimately linked with cell size maintenance. It has been shown that endocytosis and exocytosis play crucial roles in regulating the cell surface area [17], [18], [19], [20]. Myosin Vb- an actin based molecular motor- acts as an effector for Rab GTPases Rab8a, Rab10 and Rab11a [21], [22], [23], [24], [25] to regulate exocytosis and recycling of membrane components as well as receptors [23], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]. Furthermore, Myosin Vb along with Rab10 is involved in membrane biogenesis during axon formation [36]. Recent reports suggest that in neurons, the myosin V paralogs act redundantly to regulate neuronal size by controlling transport of PTEN to the plasma membrane [37]. It is not clear whether any of the myosin V paralogs regulates cell size in the epidermis.

The functions of Myosin V at the organismal level have been unravelled by performing loss of function studies. In Drosophila, didum/myosin V has been implicated in apical transport of Rhodopsin in photoreceptor cells, secretion of proteins 2A12 as well as Pio in trachea and localisation of oskar mRNA in the oocyte [38], [39], [40], [41]. Of the three vertebrate paralogs, MyoVa, in association with Rab27a and Melanophilin/Slac2-a, is involved in melanosome trafficking [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47]. Consistently, mutations in myoVa result in hypo-pigmentation of hair and skin in mammals [45], [48], [49], [50]. In humans this hypo-pigmentation phenotype may exist along with immunological defects or neurological dysfunction and is called Griscelli syndrome [51]. In addition, mutations in myoVb – the second myosin paralog - in humans are associated with Microvillus Inclusion Disease, which is characterised by inclusion bodies as well as loss of cell polarity in intestinal epithelium resulting in diarrhoea and excessive loss of body fluids [52]. Furthermore, Rab10-Myosin Vb dependent membrane biogenesis plays an essential role in development of optic axonal tracks in zebrafish [36].

We report here that the zebrafish larval epidermis -a simple bi-layered tissue consisting of a basal epidermis and an outer periderm - requires myoVb function for maintenance of membrane homeostasis during embryonic development. In goosepimples/myoVb deficient embryos, perturbation in plasma membrane homeostasis results in a reduced surface area and smaller size of the peridermal cells. However, this does not compromise the integrity as the loss in cell surface area is compensated by an increase in the number of peridermal cells. In contrast, decrease in cell number by p63 knockdown or by treatment with inhibitors of cell proliferation is compensated by an expansion of the epidermal cell size, which requires myoVb function. Notably, reduction of endocytosis in myoVb deficient embryos results in restoration of the peridermal cells size and proliferation to the wild type levels. Our analyses reveal an important function for myosin Vb in the maintenance of epidermal architecture and unravel a two-way compensatory mechanism in the vertebrate epidermis.


The goosepimples (gsp) locus encodes the actin based molecular motor Myosin Vb

In a mutagenesis screen, performed to identify genes involved in the maintenance of epidermal integrity (Sonawane and Nuesslein-Volhard, unpublished), we isolated two alleles of the previously identified goosepimples (gsp) gene [53]. The phenotype of gsp, which is characterised by rounding up of epidermal cells, becomes apparent between 36–48 hours post fertilisation (hpf). It is most prominent on the larval head (Figure 1A–D). While a few of the mutant embryos die by 48 hpf, most larvae recover and show a subtle or no morphological phenotype beyond 72 hpf (Figure S1A,B). Immunostaining for the tight junction component, ZO-1 and the adherens junction component E-cadherin confirmed that several of gsp peridermal cells exhibit rounded-up morphology in comparison to polygonal shapes in the wild-type (Figure 1E,F). However, there is no prominent effect on the shape of basal epidermal cells in the mutant larvae (Figure S1C,D). Scanning electron microscopy analysis further revealed that at 48 hpf wild type peridermal cells have a flat apical surface whereas in the mutant periderm, cells bulge out of the tissue (Figure 1G,H).

Figure 1. The gsp locus encodes for molecular motor Myosin Vb.

Representative images of 48hpf wild-type (A,C) and gsp mutant larvae (B,D). ZO1 immuno-localisation indicates that as compared to wild type (E) cell shapes are irregular and peridermal cells are smaller in the gsp mutant (F). SEM images of wild-type (G) and gsp mutant (H) confirm the rounding-up phenotype of peridermal cells. Sequence chromatograms of gspNS042, gspAT021 and gspNG061 alleles (I). The asterisks in ‘I’ indicate the base substitutions in the mutant alleles. In situ hybridisation using antisense (J) and sense (K) probes against myoVb. High magnification image (L) reveal that myoVb is expressed in the head peridermal cells. A schematic (M) of domain structure of Myosin Vb indicating the positions of mutations in the three alleles. Note that in NG061 allele the splice site mutation is at 451st aa but the truncation would occur at 475th aa due to a frame-shift. Scale bars in G, H corresponds to 15 µ.

The gsp locus was mapped to a narrow interval of 0.2 cM between two z markers, z11532 and z7809, on chromosome 21. We selected myoVb as a candidate gene and sequenced the entire cDNA from the three alleles, two from the recent screen and one from the previous screen. In gspNS042 and gspAT021 alleles, we found non-sense mutations leading to premature stop at- aa 888 (cysteine) and 1111 (Tyrosine) positions, respectively (Figure 1I). In gspNG061 we identified a modified transcript with the 10th exon missing (Figure S1E) which leads to a frame-shift resulting in a premature termination of the protein at the 475th amino acid. Sequencing of the genomic locus identified a mutation in the splice donor site flanking exon 10, which results in deletion of exon 10 (Figure 1I). Myosin Vb consists of an ATPase/motor domain, calmodulin binding domains, coiled-coils and a Dilute domain (Figure 1M). Since all three mutations abrogate large parts of the tail, which is involved in cargo binding, we presume a complete loss of motor function in all three alleles. In addition, in these three mutant alleles conserved Rab10 [36] and Rab11 binding sites (Figure S1F) are absent indicating major effect on the membrane recycling and biogenesis activity of Myosin Vb [23], [36]. We further knocked down myoVb function using morpholinos designed against the transcriptional start site and the splice donor site, mutated in the NG061 allele. Both the morpholinos recapitulated the gsp phenotype (Figure S1G–J).

The zebrafish genome assembly Zv9 shows 2 copies of myoVb in the genomic interval where gsp maps. We identified two introns- between exon 10 to 11 and exon 17 to18 - which showed different lengths in the two copies. However, the PCR amplification of these two introns from the genomic DNA isolated from mutant larvae did not yield two different products (Figure S2A). Furthermore, by genomic sequencing of a 361 bp region around the NS042 mutation from 5 gsp mutant larvae, we did not obtain a wild type peak (for T) along with the mutant peak (for A), which is expected if there are two copies and only one is mutated at this site (Figure S2B). We conclude that there is only one myoVb gene in the genomic interval between z11532 and z7809.

We analysed the expression of three myosin V paralogs by in situ hybridisation. This analysis revealed that initial ubiquitous expression of myoVb during gastrulation becomes restricted to the epidermis, lateral line primordium, otic placode and pronephros by 24 hpf (Figure 1 J–L). By 48hpf the epidermal expression persists only in the head epidermis (Figure S2C). Imaging of 24 and 48 hour old larvae at higher magnification and sectioning of the 48hpf stained larvae revealed that myoVb is mainly expressed in the superficial peridermal cells in the epidermis (Figure 1L; Figure S2C,F). Neither myoVaa, which show higher homology with murine myoVa, nor myoVc is expressed in the epidermis (Figure S2D,E). RT-PCR analysis of early cleavage stages revealed that detectable levels of transcripts for both myoVaa and myoVc, but not for myoVb, are deposited maternally (Figure S2G).

To conclude, gsp encodes for the actin based molecular motor Myosin Vb. During early embryogenesis, myoVb is expressed ubiquitously including in the EVL-the precursor of periderm. At later stages, the expression is observed in the periderm at 24hpf and persists in the dorsal head peridermal cells at 48hpf.

Recycling endosomes, late endosomes and lysosomes accumulate in the peridermal cells in the absence of gsp/myoVb function

Drosophila Myosin V and Myosin Vb in vertebrates have been shown to be essential for the apical secretion and transport of recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane [21], [22], [23], [26], [27], [29], [38], [39], [54]. We hypothesised that perturbation in any of these functions would lead to an increase in the vesicular content in the cytoplasm of the mutant peridermal cells. Indeed, our electron microscopy analysis revealed vesicular bodies of varying sizes in the cytoplasm of the mutant peridermal cells (Figure S3A–D).

In order to probe the formation of vesicular bodies in a more tractable manner, we used a zebrafish transgenic line in which the claudin B promoter drives the expression of lynEGFP in the peridermal cells [55]. Lyn tag is a ten amino acid peptide derived from the Lyn protein belonging to the Src family of kinases. This peptide gets myristylated as well as palmitylated inside the cell and gets tethered into the membranes [56]. The myoVb morphants, obtained using splice site morpholino, and gsp mutants both exhibited accumulation of vesicular bodies in the peridermal cells labelled with lynEGFP (Figure S3E,F). Since myoVb morpholino injected embryos showed a highly specific phenotype indistinguishable from the gsp mutant phenotype, we used this morpholino for further analysis. By using morpholino-mediated knock-down of myoVb in the Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) line followed by immunostaining for GFP at different developmental stages, we observed an accumulation of small vesicles in the morphants as early as 24hpf, much before the morphological phenotype becomes apparent (Figure 2A2,B2). The number and size of these vesicular bodies increased over time indicating an increase in the cytoplasmic membranous material at subsequent stages (Figure 2A1–B4). Interestingly, even though the morphological rounding up phenotype subsides, the accumulation of vesicular bodies persists at 4dpf in the gsp mutants indicating that the recovery does not happen at the cellular level (Figure 2C,D). Even at 7dpf, vesicles are seen in gsp mutants albeit with reduced number as compared to earlier stages (Figure S3G,H).

Figure 2. In absence of Myosin Vb, endosomes and lysosomes accumulate in the cytoplasm of peridermal cells.

Time course analysis of vesicle accumulation in control (A1–A4) and myoVb (B1–B4) morpholino injected embryos using Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) background. Note that the accumulation of vesicles begins at 24hpf. In comparison to wild-type (WT) larva (C) gsp mutant (D) exhibit vesicles in the peridermal cells at 4dpf. Analysis of EGFP-Rab 5 (E,F), EGFP-Rab 11 (G,H), EGFP-Rab7 (I,J) vesicle accumulation at 30 hpf in control morpholino (E,G,I) and myoVb morpholino (F,H,J) injected embryos. Note the increase in EGFP-Rab5, EGFP-Rab11 and EGFP-Rab7 labelled endosomes in morphants (F,H,J). Lamp-1 staining in control (K) and gsp/myoVb mutant (L) embryos using Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) background reveals increased lysosomal activity in mutants (L). Quantification of Rab5 and Rab11 vesicles in control and myoVb morpholino injected embryos at 30 hpf (M). Arrowheads in E,F indicate EGFP-Rab5 labelled early endosomes; in G,H, EGFP-Rab11 labelled recycling endosomes and in I,J, EGFP-Rab7 labelled late endosomes. Asterisk in ‘M’ indicate that the difference between control and myoVb morpholino injected embryos is statistically significant as per student's t test (p≤0.05). Scale bars correspond to 20 µ.

To further understand the nature of accumulated vesicles, we depleted Myosin Vb levels in transgenic lines, which ubiquitously express EGFP tagged versions of Rab5c, Rab11a and Rab7 [57]. Rab5 and Rab7 mark the early (EE) and late endosome (LE), respectively, whereas Rab11 forms a ternary complex with Myosin Vb and Rab11 family interacting proteins and marks recycling endosome (RE) [21], [22], [58], [59], [60], [61]. While both morphants and control exhibited numerous EEs and REs at 30hpf, our quantification revealed an increase in the number of Rab5 and Rab11 labelled vesicles in the peridermal cells of morphant embryos (Figure 2E–H, M). Although LEs were barely detectable in the wild type peridermal cells, their number and size was substantially increased in the periderm of myoVb morphants at 48hpf (Figure 2I,J). To test whether the accumulated endosomes undergo lysosomal degradation, we used Lamp 1, a bona fide lysosomal marker, and Lysotracker dye, which exhibits fluorescence in an acidic environment. Stainings revealed that the wild type peridermal cells show rare and isolated spots of Lysotracker/Lamp1 labelled compartments. In comparison, the myoVb deficient peridermal cells showed a remarkable increase in lysosomal compartments, accumulated in the perinuclear region (Figure 2K,L; Figure S3I,J). Although not as prominent, this increase in lysosomal activity is present even at 8dpf in the peridermal cell of the gsp mutants (Figure S3K,L).

To conclude, the presence of Rab5 and Rab11 endosomes indicates that endocytosis and recycling takes place in the peridermal cells in wild type embryos. However, the lysosomal activity is minimal in wild type peridermal cells presumably due to recycling of endocytosed material or its retrograde transport to Golgi. In the absence of gsp/myoVb function, early recycling and late endosomes accumulate in the peridermal cells. The endosomes accumulated in myoVb deficient peridermal cells are further targeted for lysosomal degradation. The endosome accumulation precedes the morphological rounding up phenotype and is not a consequence of the loss of peridermal cell shape.

Endocytosis from apical and basolateral domains of peridermal cells contribute to the endosomal pool in the absence of myoVb function

While we demonstrated that the cytoplasm of gsp/myoVb deficient peridermal cells is filled with endosomal/lysosomal vesicles, their origin remained unclear. We analysed the uptake and progression of 10 kda Alexa fluor 546-conjugated Dextran in the myoVb morphant and control larvae in the Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) line to ascertain the origin of the endosomes. Incubation of 27hpf larvae for 9 hours revealed small Dextran-positive vesicles in the wild type peridermal cells. In contrast, in myoVb morphants Dextran was observed in the large perinuclear vesicles in the peridermal cells (Figure 3A,B). In myoVb morphants Dextran filled vesicles were seen enriched at the apical domain but not at the basolateral domain of the peridermal cells (Figure 3G). This observation further suggested that the tracer enters from the apical domain of the peridermal cells. To validate this observation, we followed the uptake of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) after its binding to the apical surface. WGA binds to surface glycoproteins and gets endocytosed by the peridermal cells from 10 minutes onwards. The time-lapse analysis along the z-axis confirmed that the tracer enters peridermal cells by apical endocytosis in the morphants (Figure S4).

Figure 3. Endocytosis from apical and basolateral domain contributes to endosome and lysosome formation.

Uptake of Alexa 546 conjugated Dextran (A,B) and pHrodo Dextran (C,D) by peridermal cells in control (A,C) and myoVb (B,D) morpholino injected embryos obtained from Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) line. Alexa 546 Dextran and pHrodo Dextran accumulates in lynEGFP vesicles in the morphants. Caveolin staining in lynEGFP expressing peridermal cells of control (E) and myoVb morphants (F) reveal that endocytosis from basolateral domain contributes for vesicle formation in morphants. X-Y plane and orthogonal projections of Alexa 546 Dextran, lynEGFP (G) and caveolin, lynEGFP (H) labelled morphant peridermal cells. Note the apical localisation of Dextran vesicles (arrowhead in G) and basolateral localization of caveolin vesicle (arrowhead in H). Scale bars are equivalent to 10 µ.

To confirm that the material endocytosed from the apical domain is reaching the late endosomes or lysosomes, we followed the uptake of pHrodo Dextran. The fluorescence intensity of pHrodo Dextran increases in the acidic environment. After 6 hours of incubation, the tracer was found in the perinuclear compartments in the morphant peridermal cells confirming the acidic nature of these compartments whereas in wild type cells low signal for pHrodo Dextran was detected (Figure 3C,D). Such a low signal in wild type suggests that lysosomal degradation happens minimally in wild type peridermal cells possibly due to minimal routing of endosomes to this pathway. However, in the absence of myoVb function, a potential failure of recycling might cause the trapped apical endosomes to be targeted for degradation.

We further asked whether basolateral plasma membrane contributes to the formation of these late endosomal/lysosomal compartments. We used caveolin as a marker for endocytosis from the basolateral side. In the myoVb deficient peridermal cells, large aberrant caveolin labelled vesicles were observed tethered to the basolateral domain and in the cytoplasm at 27–30hpf (Figure 3E,F,H). In control embryos such vesicles were not observed. The Dextran uptake assay combined with caveolin staining revealed that Dextran is never localized to caveolin labelled vesicles (Figure S5A,B) further corroborating the finding that Dextran enters the peridermal cells from the apical side.

Beginning at 33hpf, we observed a third distinct phase of endocytosis in several peridermal cells selectively in myoVb morphants. It occurs just before the morphological cell rounding phenotype becomes apparent and is characterized by massive endocytic spurts. These spurts are marked with Caveolin and E-cadherin indicating their basolateral origin (Figure S5C–F). The time lapse microscopy analysis revealed that during these bursts the plasma membrane between two juxtaposed cells is endocytosed enabling the cells to change their neighbours, a process reminiscent of intercalation (Supplemental Movies 1, 2). The occurrence of these endocytic bursts decreases by 72hpf as the morphological phenotype subsides (Figure S5E–H).

To conclude, three distinct modes of endocytosis contribute to the formation of endosomes or lysosomes in myoVb deficient peridermal cells. In the first mode, the apical endosomes generated through fluid phase endocytosis are targeted to lysosomal degradation in the absence of myoVb function. The second mode comprises of caveolar endocytosis between 23–30hpf. The third mode, which begins after 33hpf, is characterized by endocytic spurts arising from the basolateral domain leading to cellular intercalation like events. Although fluid phase endocytosis was seen in wild type embryos, caveolar endocytosis and basolateral endocytosis was never observed in control siblings suggesting that these may be secondary consequences of alterations in cellular physiology under stress in the absence of myoVb function.

Peridermal cells exhibit a reduced surface area in the absence of functional gsp/myoVb

Our data indicate that in the absence of functional Myosin Vb, endosomes generated from apical and basolateral plasma membrane domains accumulate in the cytoplasm. We further investigated the effects of perturbed plasma membrane homeostasis on the epidermis. Endocytosis of the membrane components, followed by failure in recycling or membrane biogenesis, should lead to a decrease in the cell surface area. To accommodate the cytoplasmic volume, peridermal cells would initially unfold the membrane sequestered in the cellular projections and will eventually round up or bulge out leading to the goosepimples phenotype. We first analysed the membrane projections in the basolateral domain of the peridermal cells using cldnB:lynEGFP line. Fixed preparations at 24 hpf and in vivo live imaging between 18–26 hpf revealed numerous membrane ruffles in the basolateral domain in wild type embryos. In contrast, in the myoVb morphant larvae, membrane ruffles diminished over time and membranes appeared smooth and thin by 24 hpf with concomitant increase in the perinuclear vesicular pool (Figure 4A,B; Supplemental Movies 3, 4). In wild type periderm the micro-ridges showed random distribution all over the apical domain at 36hpf. In contrast, in the gsp mutants/myoVb morphants a large central region devoid of microridges was evident in the apical domain and ridges were more restricted to the peripheral region (Figure 4C–F).

Figure 4. Effect of loss of myosin Vb function on membrane projections, cell size and cell surface area.

LynEGFP staining in Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) background revealed that membrane projections, which exist on basolateral side in wild type peridermal cells at 24hpf (A) are absent in myoVb morphants (B). Furthermore, apical microridges, present in wild type peridermal cells (C), are absent in myosin Vb morphants (D). E, F are digitally zoomed images of cells in ‘C’ and ‘D’, respectively. As compared to wild-type peridermal cells (G), morphant cells are smaller in size (H) at 36hpf. Quantification of cell surface area (I) reveals that total and apical surface area decreases substantially in morphants as compared to wild-type peridermal cells. The decrease in basolateral surface area is evident only after 48hpf. The error bars in ‘I’ represent standard errors of the mean whereas asterisks in ‘I’ indicate that the means are significantly different (student's t test p≤0.05). Arrow indicates an apical microridge in a peridermal cell. Scale bars correspond to 20 µ in A–D and G,H.

Since there was a clear effect on apical micro-ridges and the membrane ruffles in myoVb deficient larvae, we further analysed the cell size and cell surface area. This was achieved by confocal imaging of E-cadherin- a basolateral marker- and lynEGFP stained peridermal cells followed by integration of the surface area of each con-focal section along the Z-axis. At 36hpf, the morphant peridermal cells exhibited smaller sizes as compared to the control embryos (Figure 4G,H). The systematic time course analysis revealed that the total surface area in myoVb morphants decreases by more than 30% between 18–48 hpf followed by a marginal increase between 48–72hpf (Figure 4I). The effect is more pronounced on the apical membrane domain as compared to the basolateral domain (Figure 4I).

Thus, the surface area of the peridermal cells shrinks in the absence of myoVb function presumably due to defects in plasma membrane homeostasis. The apical domain shrinks at a higher rate than the basolateral, suggesting that Myosin Vb has a preferential association with apical domain-directed traffic.

Epidermal integrity is maintained by a dynamic equilibrium of cell number and cell size

The surface area of the peridermal cells decreases in the absence of myoVb function. The peridermal cells appear smaller in the gsp mutant even at 7dpf (Figure S3G,H). Interestingly, the visible cell rounding phenotype of the gsp mutant/myoVb morphant phenotype subsides by 72hpf. Besides, there are no obvious breaches in the epidermal integrity. We therefore asked whether the decrease in cell size is compensated by the increase in cell number in myoVb morphant/mutant embryos and larvae to maintain epidermal integrity. Indeed, we observed that beyond 36hpf the number of peridermal cells per unit area is higher in the myoVb morphants as compared to wild type (Figure 5A). We further used a combination of BrdU incorporation and Lgl2 staining followed by confocal microscopy analysis to determine the proliferation status in myoVb morphants. BrdU analysis revealed more cell proliferation in both the periderm and basal epidermis of the morphants as compared to the wild type embryos and larvae (Figure 5A–C). In wild type embryos, proliferation in the periderm is minimal after 36hpf whereas in Myosin Vb deficient embryos and larvae the periderm retains a higher proliferative potential (Figure 5A). To rule out the possibility that cell death rather than reduced peridermal cell size is triggering the proliferation response, we performed TUNEL assay on the morphant embryos at 48hpf. Out of 8 larvae analysed by confocal microscopy, 5 did not show any apoptotic nuclei in the head periderm where the phenotype is the strongest (Figure S6A, B). The remaining 3 showed only 1–3 apoptotic nuclei suggesting that the cell death is minimal in the absence of Myosin Vb function (Figure S6C).

Figure 5. Two-way compensatory mechanism in zebrafish embryonic epidermis.

Estimation of peridermal cell density and proliferation index in periderm and basal epidermis using BrdU labelling (A). Note the increase in number of peridermal cells per unit area, which is consistent with increase in the proliferation in the peridermal and basal epidermal cells beyond 24 and 36hpf, respectively. Lgl2 and BrdU labelling of the peridermal cells at 48hpf in wild type (B), myoVb morphant (C), p63 morphant (D) and p63,myoVb double morphant (E). Quantification (F) of cell densities and proliferation indices by BrdU labelling in periderm and basal epidermis under genetic conditions represented in B-to-E. The lynEGFP staining revealed that as compared to wild type (G) the cells are smaller in myoVb (H) and larger in p63 (I) morphants and comparable in p63,myoVb double morphants (J). Quantification of total surface area of a peridermal cell (K) at 40 hpf (for p63), 48 hpf (for PD 168393) and 50hpf (for HU) and percent survival (L) at 48hpf (for p63 and HU+Aphi), 58 hpf (for PD 168393), 74hpf (for HU) under various genetic conditions and treatments mentioned along the X-axis. Since control and myoVbMO conditions repeated in every treatment mentioned in (K), the data for these two was pooled to estimate the average. The square brackets indicate the comparison whereas asterisk indicates that the differences are statistically significant (students t test, p<0.05). The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Scale bars in E and J correspond to 20 µ in B–E and G–J, respectively.

As the cell size decreases, the epidermis compensates by increasing the number of cells. However, it was not clear whether the converse is true. Furthermore, it was also not clear whether the increased epidermal proliferation in the myoVb morphants is indeed a compensatory response, essential for survival. To analyse this, we adopted three strategies: In the first, we knocked down the function of delta p63- a gene, which is essential for maintenance of the proliferative status in the epidermis, and in the second, we treated zebrafish embryos with inhibitors of cell proliferation- hydroxyurea and aphidicolin. As our third strategy, we inhibited EGF signalling in zebrafish larvae using a specific inhibitor PD168393 [62].

The number of cells in S-phase was decreased in p63 morphants leading to reduced density of peridermal cells in wild type as well as Myosin Vb deficient embryos (Figure 5B–E, F). Similarly, phospho-histone H3 staining revealed that treatment with hydroxyurea resulted in decreased proliferation of basal as well as peridermal cells (Figure S7A–H,I). PD168393 treatment, starting at 18hpf, resulted in decrease in nuclear phosphorylated ERK (pERK) and concomitant reduction in the peridermal proliferation by 30hpf as assessed by BrdU incorporation (Figure S8A1–H). The effect of PD168393 treatment on proliferation was more profound in the periderm as compared to the basal epidermis (Figure S8M). The cell size analysis revealed that in p63 morphants as well as in hydroxyurea and PD168393 treated embryos, cells were bigger and had significantly larger surface area as compared to control embryos (Figure 5G,I,K; Figure S7J,K,N,O; Figure S8I,J). The depletion of Myosin Vb in p63 morphants or PD168393 or hydroxyurea treated embryos led to a decrease in cell sizes and surface area making them comparable to wild type peridermal cells (Figure 5G–J,K; Figure S7J–Q; Figure S8I–L).

At this stage, it is not clear how the loss of p63, which essentially acts in the basal epidermis, lowers peridermal cell number in the wild type and dampens the proliferation in the myoVb morphant periderm. One possible explanation is the involvement of a trophic factor- secreted by basal epidermal cells under the control of p63- that regulates peridermal proliferation. Intriguingly, p63 deficiency resulted in an increase in proliferation in the basal epidermis of the myosin Vb morphants (Figure 5F). The reason for this increase is not clear. However, this increased proliferation did not increase the cell density in the double morphants beyond wild-type level, reflecting its late onset.

There was a significant increase in lethality during 40–60 hpf in myoVb morphants injected with p63 morpholino or treated with hydroxyurea+aphidicolin or PD168393 (Figure 5L). In fact, none of the PD168393 treated morphants survived beyond 60hpf. The myoVb morphants treated with just hydroxyurea survived up to 72–75hpf and allowed us to investigate the effect of loss of cell proliferation on the peridermal cell morphology in myoVb morphants. The hydroxyurea treated myoVb morphants exhibited a rough epidermis phenotype along with misshaped peridermal cells at 72hpf in contrast to myoVb morphants alone, which recover by 72hpf (Figure S7N–U).

To confirm that the cell size is linked with the proliferative status, we asked whether the peridermal cell proliferation reduces in myoVb morphants upon decrease in endocytosis. We reasoned if the endocytosis is inhibited, the cell surface area would be maintained in the myoVb morphants leading to mitigation of the proliferation phenotype. We used dynasore, a chemical inhibitor, to block the dynamin dependent endocytosis [63]. In the presence of dynasore there was a considerable decrease in endocytosis in the Myosin Vb deficient embryos as revealed by the uptake of two tracers, dextran and WGA, and by reduction in the number of Rab 5 labelled endosomes (Figure 6A–H, Q; Figure S9A–E). Although control myoVb morphants showed presence of dextran containing vesicles in the peridermal cells upon 4 hr incubation, there was no appreciable uptake of dextran by the wild type cells suggesting increased fluid phase endocytosis in the morphants (Figure 6C,D). The apparent decrease in WGA uptake by peridermal cells in the myosin morphants as compared to wild type embryos is presumably due to reduced binding of WGA to the apical domain (Figure S9F–H). This might be a consequence of decreased levels of surface mucous- to which WGA binds - in the Myosin Vb deficient embryos (Figure S3A, B). Since endocytosis was significantly reduced in the presence of dynasore, we asked whether there is any effect on the cell size and proliferation. Indeed, the area estimation revealed that as compared to untreated larvae, dynasore treated wild type and morphant embryos showed significant increase in the cell surface area (Figure 6I,J,M,N, R). Besides, there was a clear and specific decrease in cell proliferation in the periderm of the morphants but not in the basal epidermis confirming the link between peridermal cell size and proliferative status (Figure 6K,L,O,P,R). Interestingly, we also observed a visible effect on the strength of the phenotype upon dynasore treatment. While several of the untreated morphant embryos showed a stronger phenotype at 48 hpf (Figure 6T), dynasore treatment resulted in an increase in the number of embryos showing milder phenotypes (Figure 6U). A systematic quantification at two different time points, 40 and 48 hpf (N = 3), revealed a delayed onset as well as reduction in the strength of the phenotype in dynasore treated morphants (Figure 6S).

Figure 6. Reduction in endocytosis mitigates the cellular and morphological phenotype in Myosin Vb deficient embryos.

Endocytosis of tracers WGA (A,B,E,F) and Dextran (C,D,G,H) in wild type (A,E, C,G) and myoVb morphant embryos (B,F,D,H) treated with DMSO (A,B,C,D) and dynasore (E,F,G,H) in the LynEGFP background. The dynasore treatment decreases endocytosis of both WGA and Dextran. Note that in wild type larvae there is hardly any dextran uptake indicating low rate of fluid phase endocytosis. As compared to wild type, WGA uptake appears less in the morphant. The reason being that the mucous layer is reduced in the mutants. The LynEGFP staining (I,J,M,N) in wild type (I,M) and myosin Vb morphants (J,N) treated with DMSO (I,J) and dynasore (M,N). Cell proliferation analysis using BrdU incorporation (K,L,O,P) in wild type (K,O) and myoVb morphant (L,P) treated with DMSO (K,L) and dynasore (O,P) in LynEGFP background. Note the decrease in proliferation in the morphant periderm upon dynasore treatment. Quantification of WGA and Dextran (Q) uptake by peridermal cells in different genetic backgrounds and under different treatments mentioned along the X axis. The first graph shows the number of cells per field showing uptake of the tracers. The second graph represents the number of vesicles per cell. For this analysis only the cells showing tracer uptake were considered. Quantification of area and cell proliferation for genetic backgrounds and various treatments shown along the X-axis (R). Quantification of embryos showing various degrees of phenotypic strengths (S) at 40 hpf (first graph) and 48 hpf (second graph). The morphant embryos were categorised in three phenotypic classes- strong, mild and no phenotype- based on the head periderm phenotype. The embryos classified as “no phenotypes” exhibited the decreased fin expansion and occasionally a few rounded up cells in the finfold. Bright field images showing strong (T) and mild (U) phenotypes. Scale bar in F, H corresponds to 10 µ in A,B,E,F and C,D,G,H, respectively whereas scale bars in N,P corresponds to 20 µ in I,J,M,N and K,L,O,P, respectively. Square brakets and associated aseterisks in Q and R represent the comparison by T-test and significant difference (P≤0.05), respectively.

To conclude, our data suggest that the periderm maintains a dynamic balance between cell number and cell size. A decrease in cell size is balanced by an increase in cell number and vice versa. The myoVb function is essential to achieve an appropriate peridermal cell size in the absence of cell proliferation. Reduction in cell proliferation in the periderm of myoVb morphants leads to increased lethality presumably due to the compromised recovery of the tissue architecture. Furthermore, the mitigation of the morphological phenotype upon dynasore treatment suggests that the endocytosis is causally linked to the acquisition of cell rounding phenotype in Myosin Vb deficient embryos.


The maintenance of cell size in the epidermis and its role in tissue homeostasis has remained unclear so far. Here, we show that gsp/myoVb function is essential for the maintenance of peridermal cell size. By analysing gsp/myoVb mutant and morphant embryos, we have unravelled the importance of cell size in the maintenance of epidermal homeostasis during development.

The myoVb gene encodes an unconventional myosin motor, which is involved in cellular transport along the actin cables. It has been shown to interact with Rab8a, Rab10 and Rab11a and associate with the plasma membrane recycling systems [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In fact, its function has been shown to be essential for recycling of various receptors[26], [27], [29], [30], [31], for apical secretion [54] and for transport [32], [33], [34]. In the Drosophila genome, a single myosin V gene, didum, is shown to be essential for Rhodopsin transport in photoreceptor cells, for apical secretion in epithelial tubes and for the posterior localisation of oskar mRNA in the oocyte [38], [39], [40], [41]. Thus, although the functions of didum and myoVb have been well described in transport of various cargoes, the effect of loss of myoVb function on tissue architecture has not been investigated so far. Such an effect on the entire tissue could be due to changes in the physical parameters such as cell shape or size, as a consequence of perturbed endosomal transport, and may not be due to misrouting of a particular receptor or membrane component.

Cells actively regulate their surface area, which directly depends upon the amount of plasma membrane [64]. In secretory cells, compensatory endocytosis is involved in retrieving the additional membrane added during exocytosis [65], [66]. Umbrella cells in urinary bladder undergo repeated cycles of expansion and shrinkage, which are regulated by concomitant Myosin Vb dependent exocytosis and dynamin dependent endocytosis, respectively [19], [35], [67]. We show that the myoVb function is essential for the maintenance of the cell surface area in zebrafish epidermis. Our data - based on Dextran, WGA uptake and labelling of various endosomal and lysosomal compartments - suggest that during embryogenesis wild-type peridermal cells exhibit significant endocytic and recycling activity with minimal lysosomal degradation. The total surface area per cell is maintained between 1200–1500 µm2 in the wild type periderm, suggesting that the retrograde (endocytic) membrane flux is balanced by the anterograde (recycling/biogenesis) flux (Figure 7A). In the myoVb deficient embryos the increase in Rab5, Rab11 and Rab7 labelled endosomes indicates enhanced endocytosis, possible reduction in recycling and accumulation of late endosomes. This increased retrograde flux in myoVb morphants is consistent with the role of Myosin Vb as an effector for Rab GTPases Rab8a, Rab10 and Rab11a, which are involved in membrane recycling or biogenesis pathways [23]. Intriguingly, there is also an increase in caveolin endocytosis and basolateral endocytosis; both may be secondary consequences of mechanical or physiological stress. The basolateral endocytic spurts are associated with cell rearrangements, which might help to counteract local stress arising due to cell shrinkage in myoVb morphants. Thus, in Myosin Vb deficient peridermal cells the retrograde membrane flux is much more than the anterograde flux. This results in imbalance of plasma membrane homeostasis, leading to shrinkage of cell surface area (Figure 7A). Consistently, the reduction in the retrograde flux by partial inhibition of the endocytosis results in restoration of the cell size in Myosin Vb deficient cells.

Figure 7. Schematic representation of myosin Vb function in the epidermis and its link with tissue homeostasis.

In wild-type peridermal cells the endocytosis and recycling is balanced maintaining the plasma membrane homeostasis (A). In Myosin Vb deficient embryos, there is increased endocytosis and reduction in recycling leading to accumulation of endosomes, which are targeted for degradation in lysosomes (A). As a consequence the plasma membrane homeostasis is perturbed leading to shrinkage of cell surface area, which results in loss of membrane projections and in cell-bulging (A). Reduction in cell surface area in gsp/myoVb is compensated by increase in peridermal cell number. In contrast decrease in cell number results in bigger cells in the periderm (B). Epidermis maintains the dynamic balance between cell size and cell number.

A recent report suggests that the size of neurons increase because of the failure of PTEN transport to the plasma membrane in the absence of both myosin Va and myosin Vb [37]. This is in contrast to our finding that peridermal cells shrink as a consequence of perturbed membrane homeostasis in the absence of Myosin Vb function. At present it is difficult to resolve this discrepancy but it is possible that the loss of PTEN from the plasma membrane overrides endocytosis, endosome accumulation and degradation in the neurons. This study does not report the effect of loss of Myosin V function on endosomal accumulation. It appears that the effect of the loss of motor function on cell size may be tissue and context- developing versus differentiated- dependent.

The gsp/myoVb mutant provides an ideal platform to study the effect of dysregulation of plasma membrane homeostasis on cell size, tissue architecture and development of the epidermis. In the myoVb morphants when the cell surface area decreases, the peridermal cells, which otherwise become post-mitotic, retain their division potential for a longer time. On the other hand, when cell proliferation is blocked, the cells increase their surface area to compensate for the lower number of cells in the tissue. Thus, in the epidermis cell number and cell size is regulated in such a way that a loss in one would be compensated by a gain in the other (Figure 7B). Such a two-way compensatory mechanism might be useful in maintaining epidermal architecture in the absence of either proliferation or cell expansion and under physical assaults, which lead to sudden loss of cells. Indeed, neither gsp/myoVb mutations nor inhibition of epidermal proliferation alone is lethal during 48–72hpf in zebrafish. However, inhibiting cell proliferation as well as myoVb activity leads to increased lethality presumably due to the effect on the epidermal architecture, which is evident in hydroxyurea treated myoVb morphants.

How does decrease in cell size trigger the proliferation? The decrease in cell surface area by increased inward membrane flux must generate an inward pull within each cell. Since peridermal cells are coupled to each other through cellular junctions, this inward pull will generate tension across the cell-cell contacts, which are mediated by adherens junctions. It has been shown that the increased mechanical stress leads to cadherin dependent sustained increase in cell proliferation [68]. Furthermore, pathways such as Hippo and Rho GTPase signalling may act as downstream effectors of mechanical stress to obtain increase in the proliferation [69], [70], [71]. It seems unlikely that myoVb deficiency directly activates proliferation independent of its effect on peridermal cell size, because the proliferative response is highly regulated and compensatory in nature and can be mitigated by dynasore treatment. One would expect a neoplastic response if a signalling pathway has gone awry in the absence of myoVb function. Indeed, it has been shown that activation of EGF signalling in pen/lgl2 mutant leads to a cancer like phenotype in the zebrafish epidermis [62]. The link between the cell size and proliferation may not be specific to the gsp/myoVb mutant. We have identified at least two more genetic conditions, a zebrafish mutant called romeharsha and the previously published clint1 loss of function scenario [72], which exhibit a vesicular accumulation phenotype similar to gsp. Both show reduced surface area and increased proliferation in the periderm (Phatak, et al., unpublished). We propose that plasma membrane homeostasis, in general, is linked with cell size regulation and cell proliferation in the periderm. The basal cell proliferation in gsp/myoVb, however, does not seem to be linked with peridermal cell size or proliferation as it does not show dampening upon dynasore treatment. The reason for this increased proliferation in the basal epidermis is currently unclear and needs to be investigated further.

The increase in cell surface area in the absence of proliferation requires Myosin Vb activity. This raises a possibility that the Myosin Vb function is also important for membrane biogenesis in the periderm. Myosin Vb has been shown to be involved in membrane biogenesis in the neurons by interacting with Rab10 [36]. Although we observed significant reduction in the Dextran or WGA labelled endosomes arising from the apical surface in the MyoVb morphants upon dynasore treatment, the lynEGFP labelled vesicular bodies still persisted in the cytoplasm. It is plausible that some of these are arising due to dynamin independent endocytosis while some are biogenic vesicles, which are not targeted to the plasma membrane in the absence of myoVb function.

In Myosin Vb deficient embryos, all the peridermal cells exhibit the accumulation of vesicles and reduction in the cell surface area but only a few, especially over the head, round up. There are at least four possible reasons why cells would round up in the absence of Myosin Vb function: a) This might be a result of more mechanical stress experienced by the peridermal cells over the head as the brain ventricles are expanding. b) The peridermal cell rounding is linked with the cell division [20]. It has been shown that mitotic cells round up during their progression from interphase to metaphase due to the reduction in their surface area as a consequence of clathrin mediated endocytosis. As the division proceeds, cells regain their shape by recycling of the accumulated membrane components [20]. In Myosin Vb deficient cells the lack of membrane recycling may leave dividing cells arrested in rounded up morphology. c) Members of the Myosin superfamily such as non-muscle Myosin II have been shown to be involved in force generation and cell shape maintenance [73]. Thus, Myosin Vb may have a structural role to play in maintenance of the cell shapes and hence in its absence cells assume rounded up morphology under mechanical stress. d) It is reasonable to argue that the cells that round up are physiologically different from the rest of the epidermal cells and exhibit more endocytosis. In such highly endocytic cells, the loss of myoVb function will have severe consequences leading to a faster decrease in cell surface area. Under such a scenario, peridermal cells would round up to accommodate the cytoplasmic volume. Indeed, peridermal cells in the dorsal head are derived from the dorsal EVL [74], which overlaps with non-involuting endocytic marginal cells having higher endocytic activity during gastrulation [75]. Although we cannot negate the possibility of Myosin Vb functioning in the shape maintenance, our finding that the reduction in endocytosis mitigates the cell rounding phenotype in myosin morphants favour the possibility that the extent of endocytosis is a major cause of cell rounding up phenotype. The link between rounding up and cell division can be easily ruled out because upon blockade of cell proliferation we still observe rounded up peridermal cells in the Myosin Vb deficient embryos. Whether the reason for rounding up of head peridermal cells is mechanical or physiological, the importance of myoVb function in head periderm is underscored by the fact that these cells exhibit elevated levels of transcription of myoVb at 2dpf as shown by in situ hybridisation.

Insights into the function of Myosin Vb in epithelial tissues at the organismal level have been gained from studies done on human individuals suffering from microvillus inclusion disease. This disease is caused by mutations in myoVb and is characterized by perpetual diarrhoea [52]. It has been shown that in these patients inclusion bodies consisting of microvillar components accumulate in the cytoplasm resulting in microvillar atrophy [76]. Our analyses show an effect on the organization of the apical microridges, actin based structures similar to microvilli, in peridermal cells. Although we did not observe inclusion bodies that contain either actin or Ezrin, we observed increased Dextran vesicles at the apical cortex in the uptake assays indicating increased apical membrane retrieval in Myosin Vb deficient peridermal cells. Our ongoing analysis of the gsp/myoVb mutant gut suggests that the gut epithelial cells do exhibit inclusion bodies. The mutant larvae do not survive beyond 12–14 dpf presumably due to the cumulative effect on epidermis and gut functioning.

To summarise, we have unravelled a hitherto unknown function of myoVb in the vertebrate epidermis. We have shown that Myosin Vb regulated plasma membrane homeostasis is essential for the maintenance of peridermal cell size. We have further been able to show that the epidermis has the ability to compensate for the loss of cell surface area by increasing its cell number and vice versa. We predict that such a mechanism would be useful under circumstances, such as large wounds, wherein there is a sudden decrease in the cell number. Our study warrants analysis of the barrier function of the epidermis in human patients suffering from the microvillus inclusion disease.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

For zebrafish maintenance and experimentation, the guidelines recommended by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), Govt of India, were followed. Institute Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) approved the animal care procedures and protocols used in this study vide the sanction TIFR/IAEC/2013-3.

Fish strains

Three mutant alleles of goosepimples, gspNS042, gspNG061 and gspAT21 were used for the experiments. Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) line [55] was used for live imaging experiments to visualize plasma membrane. Tg (h2afx: EGFP-Rab5c)mw5, Tg (h2afx: EGFP-Rab11a)mw6 and Tg (h2afx: EGFP-Rab7)mw7 lines [57] were used to ascertain the nature of vesicles in the peridermal cells. Microinjections were done in albino, Tuebingen and pet-shop derived local strain. For in situ hybridization embryos from albino strain were used.

Mapping and positional cloning

Mapping and positional cloning was done as described previously [77], [78]. For sequencing, cDNA was amplified using gene specific primers, which were designed using accession XM_690697.3 (replaced by NM_001161632), and using proofreading DNA polymerases (Fermentas, Roche). To detect the mutation in splice donor/acceptor site flanking exon 10, the region was amplified from genomic DNA (prepared for mapping) by PCR using high fidelity DNA polymerases (Takara, Roche) and directly sequenced. To check for a possible myoVb duplication, genomic DNA was isolated from mutants and sibling using 50 mM NaOH treatment at 95°C for 10 minutes followed by neutralization by 1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0 [79]. To identify the mutations, sequence analysis was performed using either Lasergene software from DNASTAR or CLC main workbench. Conserved domains were identified using Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART;

Morpholino injections

Antisense morpholino oligos against myoVb and p63 [16] were obtained from Gene Tools, LLC (Eugene, Oregon). Two separate morpholinos along with their respective 5 base mismatch controls were tested for myoVb: splice site directed- 5′GATCTTCTATTACTGACCGAGTTGA3′ and control 5′GATGTTGTATTACTCACCCACTTGA3′ (used at 200 µM); and ATG morpholino- 5′ ACTTTCCAATATCCACAGACGCACT3′ and control 5′ ACTATGCAAAATCCAGACACGCACT3′ (at 200 µM). All the morpholino studies were conducted using the splice-site morpholino. p63 morpholino 5′CCCTAGTTTTCTTCCTTTTATCCCC3′ was injected at 50 µM. All injections were done at 1–2 cell stage.

Immunostaining, Dextran, WGA and Lysotracker staining, Dynasore treatment

Immunostainings were done as reported previously [80]. Embryos or larvae were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS and kept overnight at 4°C, followed by methanol up-gradation and storage at −20°C for staining with anti-GFP (Torrey Pines Biolabs; TP401), monoclonal anti-GFP (Genei, Bangalore), monoclonal anti-E-Cadherin (BD Transduction Labs; 610182), anti-Caveolin1 (BD Transduction Labs; 610059), anti-Lgl2 [80], rat monoclonal anti-BrdU (Acris Antibodies; SM1667P), anti-phospho histone 3 (Millipore, 06-570), monoclonal anti-p63 (Chemicon; MAB4135) antibodies. Larvae were fixed in Dent's fixative (80∶20, Methanol: DMSO) overnight at −20°C for staining with anti-ZO-1 antibody (ZYMED Labs, Invitrogen; 61-7300). For Rab5 staining, embryos were fixed in 4% PFA in PEMTT (0.1 M PIPES, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.1% TritonX-100, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 6.8) [81] without methanol post-fixation followed by anti-GFP antibody (Torrey Pines Biolabs; TP401). The antibody dilutions used were as follows: rabbit anti-GFP (1∶200), mouse anti-GFP (1∶40), anti-E-Cadherin (1∶100), anti-Caveolin1 (1∶100), anti-Lgl2 (1∶400), anti-BrdU (1∶50), anti-phospho histone 3 (1∶400), anti-p63 (1∶100), anti-Ezrin (1∶250), anti-ZO-1 (1∶100), Alexa 488 conjugated secondary antibodies (1∶250), Cy3 and Cy5 conjugated secondary antibodies (1∶750).

For staining of live embryos and larvae, working dilutions of Lysotracker Red DND-99 (Invitrogen; L7528), 10 kDa Alexa 546-conjugated Dextran (Invitrogen; D-22911) and pHrodo Dextran (Invitrogen; P10361) were made in E3 medium without Methylene Blue. The larvae were incubated at 29°C in 5 µM Lysotracker for 3 hours or in 20 µg/ml pHrodo Dextran for 6 hours before washing in E3 and mounting in Methyl Cellulose for imaging. For 10 kDa Alexa 546-conjugated Dextran, the larvae were incubated in 10 mg/ml Dextran for 3 or 9 hours, washed and mounted for live imaging or fixed in PFA for imaging. For blockade of endocytosis, Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated Wheat Gram Agglutinin (WGA) or Alexa Fluor 546 conjugated 10 kDa Dextran (both from Invitrogen) were used as tracers in the presence of 25 µM dynasore hydrate (Sigma, D7693). The dynasore treatment started at 20hpf. The embryos were incubated at 24hpf for 1 h for WGA or at 21hpf for 4 h for Dextran in the presence of dynasore at 29°C, followed by wash and chase for 2 h in E3 buffer in the presence of dynasore. DMSO was used as a vehicle control at the concentration of 3.25 µM. Experiments were staggered in such a way that imaging could be done at 27hpf.

Electron microscopy analysis was done as described earlier [80].

In situ hybridisation

The primers were designed for amplification of specific regions for myoVaa (NM_001080959.2; bp 2880–3795), myosin Vb (NM_001161632.1; bp 2967–3866), myoVc (XM_686051.3; bp 2920–3720) using Primer3 (version 0.4.0) and cloned into pCR TOPO 2.1 or pCR TOPOII (Invitrogen). For RNA probe synthesis, templates were linearised and probes were synthesized using either T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase (Roche DIG RNA Labelling Kit). In situ hybridisations were performed as described [82] with a few modifications. For sectioning, embryos were post-fixed in 4% PFA after the completion of in situ hybridisation protocol and embedded in Epon. Sections were cut at 3 µ thickness using glass knives on Leica microtome, placed on a glass slide coated with 1% gelatin, counterstained with 4% eosin made in 90% ethanol and mounted in DPX. Sections were imaged on Zeiss ApoTome using Axiocam.

Image acquisition and processing

Imaging of immunostainings was done mostly over the head (dorsal head periderm) using either the Zeiss LSM 510 Meta with Plan-apochromat 63×/1.40 oil or EC Plan-Neofluar 40×/1.30 oil objective or on Zeiss LSM 710 with Plan-apochromat 63×/1.40. An optical zoom of 1.5× zoom was used for most of the images. 1024 by 1024 image dimensions were used, with an averaging of 4. In situ hybridization stainings were imaged either on Zeiss SteREO Discovery using AxioCam or on OLYMPUS SZX12 with OLYMPUS Camedia c-5050 Zoom camera. Imaging of peridermal cells of dorsal head region at 48hpf was done on Zeiss Axioscope 2.0 with 20×/0.75 objective.

For time lapse live imaging, larvae were dechorionated, treated with MESAB (Sigma; A5040) and embedded in 0.2% Agarose in plastic dishes with cover slip bottoms. Imaging was done on Zeiss LSM 5Live with Achroplan IR 63×/0.95 W objective, installed with a CO2 and temperature controlled chamber. The capture rate was one frame per 3 minutes for Supplementary Movie 1, 2 and one frame per 6 minutes for Supplementary Movie 3,4. Live imaging of WGA uptake from the apical surface was done on Zeiss LSM 510 using 40×/1.30 oil objective with 2× digital zoom on embryos immersed in WGA followed by immediate mounting in 0.2% agarose without washes. The scanning involved 15 optical sections in Z-direction and total 13 scan cycles, each of the duration of 238 seconds.

For imaging phenotypes and for Dextran, WGA, Rab5 live imaging as well as Lysotracker experiments, larvae were embedded in 3% Methyl Cellulose gel. DIC imaging was done on Zeiss SteREO Discovery with AxioCam. Zeiss LSM 5Live was used for Lysotracker imaging. Zeiss LSM 710 with 63× Plan-apochromat objective/1.4NA with 2× Zoom was used for Dextran and WGA assays as well as for live imaging of Rab5 vesicles associated with dynasore treatment.

Either ImageJ or ZEN Light Edition 2009 was used for image processing and analysis.

BrdU incorporation assay, inhibitor treatments, TUNEL staining

30–40 larvae were dechorionated and incubated in 6-well plates at 29°C in either 10 µM solution of BrdU in 2% DMSO in E3 or only 2% DMSO in E3 for 2 hours. They were given three 5 minutes washes with E3, followed by PFA fixation and methanol up-gradation. After downgrading to PBS and prior to processing for immunostaining, the fixed larvae were treated with 4N HCl for 20 minutes at room temperature and processed for immunostainings.

For Hydroxyurea treatment, working concentration of 50 mM was prepared using E3 without methylene blue. In case of combined treatment, 30 mM hydroxyurea and 150 uM aphidicolin was used. Final concentration of DMSO was adjusted to −0.05% v/v to increase the permeability of Aphidicolin. Both Hydroxyurea and combined treatment of Hydroxyurea+Aphidicolin were done at 24hpf on dechorionated embryos. The 1 mM stock of PD168393 (Merck Millipore 513033) was prepared in DMSO and used at 10 µM final concentration in 1% DMSO in E3 starting from 18hpf.

The TUNEL staining was performed using Promega Kit as per the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the embryos at 48hpf were fixed in 4%PFA, washed in PBT (0.1 m phosphate buffer and 0.8% triton X-100), incubated with TUNEL reaction mixture at 37°C followed by washes, DAPI staining and mounted in Glycerol for imaging.

Cell surface area quantification

For measuring surface area of plasma membrane, morpholino injections were done in Tg(cldnB:lynEGFP) background and the larvae were fixed at different stages and stained with anti-GFP and anti-E-Cadherin antibodies to obtain total surface area and basolateral area, respectively. Confocal stacks were captured at a slice interval of 0.373 µM. To quantify surface area, cell outlines were traced in each slice by monitoring the Measure Stack plug-in of ImageJ. The perimeter in each slice was multiplied by the slice thickness and added along with the area of the first and the last slice to obtain an estimate of total surface area. To quantify the area of the micro-ridges, images were smoothened and thresholded such that edges of the ridges were neatly defined. This was followed by the Analyze Particle command to detect and measure edge lengths. Detection was monitored and aided by manual detection using Wand (tracing) tool wherever required. The perimeter of all the edges was summed up and multiplied with slice thickness and number of slices the ridges extend to in order to get an estimate of the area sequestered in the membrane folds. Five cells from five larvae were analyzed for each population. The apical area was determined by subtracting basolateral surface area from the total area.

Cell, nuclei, vesicle counting and statistical analysis

Quantification of BrdU and phospho-histone labelled nuclei as well as total cells was done using Cell Counter plug-in of ImageJ. In case of BrdU labelling, five larvae were analyzed for each population for various developmental stages and eight larvae each were analyzed for myoVb and p63 interaction analysis. For phospho-histone, 7–10 larvae were analysed for each treatment.

For counting of Rab11 vesicles, live imaging of 3 control and 3 morphant embryos was done at 30 hpf for 10 minutes. For each embryo vesicles were counted at 3 different time frames by making a maximum intensity projection of 4 z stacks surrounding the nuclear region. Each embryo thus yielded three data points obtained from 4–7 cells (based on nuclear count). The value for each cell was derived by dividing the total number of vesicles by the total number of cells. The average number of vesicles was estimated from 9 data points each for control and morphant embryos. For Rab 5 vesicles, fixed preparations of 6 embryos were used with E-cadherin as a counter-stain allowing estimation of vesicle number/cell for 5 cells per embryos.

For estimation of Dextran and WGA vesicles, live imaging of 12 control and 12 morphant (N = 3) embryos was done at 27–28 hpf. First level analysis involved counting cells showing uptake of tracer within the field. At the second level, from the cells showing the uptake, vesicles were counted along X-Z direction using tracer tool in Metamorph image analysis software. ImageJ was used for the quantification of WGA fluorescence at the apical surface. For analysis of Rab5 vesicles, after live imaging vesicles were counted from 13–15 cells belonging to 4–5 embryos at 28hpf using the Metamorph tracer tool as described above. The data was presented using Box and Whisker plot.

F-tests for equality of variance followed by pair-wise comparison of means by two-tailed Student's t-tests were conducted for most of the analyses and a significance level of 0.05 was used as cut-off. Microsoft EXCEL was used for statistical analysis and plotting graphs.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Bright field images of wild type (A) and gsp mutant (B) larvae at 78hpf. E-cadherin staining in wild type (C) and gsp mutant (D) at 48hpf reveals no apparent effect on shapes of basal epidermal cells. Myosin Vb cDNA sequencing from gspNG061 allele reveals that an exon is absent in the mutant transcript (E). Sequence comparison (F) indicates that conserved Rab11 binding sites (boxed amino acids) are present in zebrafish Myosin Vb. Representative images of 5 base mismatch ATG control morpholino (G), myoVb start-site/ATG morpholino (H), 5 base mismatch splice-site control (I) and splice site morpholino (J) injected larvae at 48hpf. Arrows in H and J point to the rounded up peridermal cells over larval head, which is a classic feature of myosin Vb loss of function phenotype.



Figure S2.

PCR amplification of intron 10–11 and intron 17–18 from genomic DNA isolated from gsp mutant larvae (L1) shows bands of 2.4 kb and 288 bp sizes, respectively. Additional bands of 1.7 kb (for intron 10–11) and 371 bp (for intron 17–18) sizes are expected if two copies of myosin Vb are present at the genomic interval (A). Genomic sequencing of PCR product of 361 bp around the mutation in gspNS042 allele from wild type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−) and three mutant (−/−) embryos reveals that mutants do not show presence of “T” along with “A” which is indicative of the presence of second copy of myosin Vb gene (B). Expression analysis of myosin Vb (C), myosin Va (D) and myosin Vc (E) by in situ hybridisation (ISH) at 48hpf. Section of 48 h old larva stained for myosin Vb expression by ISH and counterstained by eosin (F). RT-PCR analysis (G) reveals that myosin Va and Vc transcripts (arrows) are maternally contributed whereas myosin Vb transcripts are not present at 2–4 cells stage. Please note that cDNA preparation from 48hpf old larvae were used as a positive control and actin primers are used to check the quality of cDNA prepared from different stages. Lane C in (A) shows size-control PCR product of 361 bp and marks the approximate position for the 371 bp band if the second copy would be present. Arrowheads in (F) indicate the ISH signal in the outermost peridermal layer of the epidermis whereas arrows indicate the staining at interphase between the epidermis and the brain. Asterisks in E indicate 1 kb marker band.



Figure S3.

Transmission electron micrograph of the wild type (A, C) and gsp mutant (B, D) peridermal cells. At lower magnification wild type cells (A) exhibit the mucous layer (arrows in A) on the apical side, which is absent in the mutant cells (B). Besides, mutant cells exhibit large transparent vesicular bodies marked with asterisks (B). At higher magnification a few vesicles (arrows in C) and microridges (arrowheads in C) are seen in the wild-type peridermal cells. The mutant cells show accumulation of several smaller vesicles (arrows in D) but loss of microridges. LynEGFP staining in gsp/myoVb mutant (E) and myoVb morphant (F) show similar cellular phenotypes at 48 hpf. At 7 dpf, size of peridermal cells in the gsp mutant (H) is smaller than in wild type (G). Lysotracker staining in LynEGFP line in wild-type (I) and myoVb morphants (J) at 48hpf and overlay for the lysotracker and LynEGFP in WT (K) and gsp mutant (L) at 8 dpf. These stainings reveal accumulation of lysosomes in the morphant and mutant peridermal cells. Abbreviations- PE-Nu: peridermal cell nucleus; BE-Nu: Basal epidermal cell nucleus. Scale bar in B and D are equivalent to 1 µ whereas those in F, H and J are equivalent to 20 µ.



Figure S4.

Live time-lapse analysis of WGA uptake in myoVb morphants in lynEGFP background across the indicated scan-cycles and z-sections. The arrowheads indicate formation and endocytosis of an apical vesicle. Note the disappearance of the vesicle in Z section −2 between 18.3 and 732.3 seconds. In section-5, this vesicle emerges as time progresses from 73.2 to 787.2 seconds. t = relative frame acquisition time.



Figure S5.

Simultaneous labelling using LynEGFP, Alexa 546 conjugated Dextran and anti caveolin antibody in control (A) and myoVb (B) morpholino injected embryos. The caveolin and Dextran label do not co-localise suggesting that Dextran enters in the cytoplasm only from the apical side of the peridermal cells. Immuno-localisation of Caveolin and LynEGFP in wild-type (C) and myoVb morphant (D) embryos at 40hpf. Arrows indicate spurts of endocytosis in the morphants whereas arrowheads indicate internalised caveolin vesicles. Overlay for E-cadherin (red) and LynEGFP (E–H) reveals that the endocytic spurts in the morphants (arrows in F) are labelled for E-cadherin at 48hpf and the frequency of the spurts decreases by 72hpf (H). Scale bars in B and D are equivalent to 10 µ whereas in H is equal to 20 µ.



Figure S6.

TUNEL (green, nuclear), LynEGFP (green, membrane label) and DAPI staining (blue) of wild type (A) and morphant embryos (B, C) at 36hpf. The arrow (C) indicates nuclear TUNEL staining in the myoVb morphant periderm. Scale bar corresponds to 20 µ.



Figure S7.

LynEGFP (green), phosphohistone-3 (red) and DAPI (blue) staining in wild type peridermal cell (A) and basal epidermal cells (B); HU treated periderm (C) and basal epidermis (D); myoVb morphant periderm (E) and basal epidermis (F); HU treated morphant periderm (G) and basal epidermis (H). Quantification of mitotic indices (I) under genetic condition and treatments mentioned along the X-axis. In myosin morphants peridermal cells exhibit increased mitosis. HU treatment inhibits proliferation in the basal epidermis of wild type and in the basal epidermis as well as periderm of myoVb morphants. LynEGFP staining in periderm of wild type control at 52 and 72 hpf (J, N), HU treated wild type (K,O), myoVb morphant (L,P) and HU treated myoVb morphant (M,Q). Note increased cell size upon HU treatment in wild type larvae (K,O) and irregular peridermal cell shapes in the HU treated myoVb morphants (Q). DIC images of wild type control (R), HU treated wild type (S), myoVb morphant (T) and HU treated myoVb morphant larvae (U) at 72hpf. While the peridermal cell rounding phenotype over the head recovers by 72hpf in myoVb morphants, it persists in HU treated morphants (arrow in U). Scale bars in H and Q correspond to 20 µ in A–H and J–Q, respectively.



Figure S8.

pERK (A1,B1,C1,D1) and pERK/LynEGFP overlays (A1,B2,C2,D2) in wild type (A1,A2,B1,B2) and myoVb morphants (C1,C2,D1,D2) treated with DMSO (A1,A2,C1,C2) and PD168393 (B1,B2,D1,D2) at 30hpf. Note the clear decrease in pERK in morphants treated with PD168393. Analysis of cell proliferation using BrdU (E,F,G,H) at 30hpf and cell size using lynEGFP line at 48hpf (I,J,K,L) in wild type (E,F,I,J) and myosin Vb morphant (G,H,K,L) treated with either DMSO (E,I,G,K) or PD168393 (F,J,H,L). In ‘H’ the few BrdU labelled nuclei of the basal epidermis are in focus at the periphery of the field. Quantification of cell proliferation in periderm and basal epidermis (M) in various genetic conditions and treatments shown across the X-axis. Scale bars in D2, L and H corresponds to 20 µ in A1–D2,I–L and in E–H, respectively. The square brackets and asterisk in (M) represent the comparisons by T-test and significant difference at (p≤0.05).



Figure S9.

Live imaging of EGFP-Rab5 endosomes in wild type (A,C) and myoVb morphant embryos (B,D) treated with DMSO (A,B) and Dynasore (C,D) at 28hpf and their quantification (E). WGA labelling in wild type (F) and myosin Vb morphant embryos (G) at 28hpf. Quantification of the labelling intensities in wild type and morphant peridermal cells (H). Scale bars in D and G equals to 10 µ. The square brackets (in E, H) represent the comparisons and the asterisks indicate the significant difference (t test; P<0.01).



Movie S1.

Time-lapse movie analysis of wild type periderm labelled with lynEGFP from 43 to 48 hpf.



Movie S2.

Time-lapse analysis of myosin Vb morphant periderm labelled with lynEGFP from 36 to 41hpf.



Movie S3.

Time-lapse movie of the lynEGFP labelled periderm in wild type starting from 18hpf for 7 hours.



Movie S4.

Time-lapse movie of lynEGFP labelled myosin Vb morphant periderm from 18hpf for 7 hours.




Our special thanks go to Hans-Martin Maischein at the MPI for Developmental Biology for help with initial mapping crosses as well as maintenance of mutant lines and Kalidas Kohale at TIFR for fish facility maintenance. We thank Heinz Schwarz at the MPI for Developmental Biology for help in electron microscopy. We thank Brian Link for sending us EGFP-Rab lines.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MS S JS SBa. Performed the experiments: S JS MP SBa AM OD SBh TJ IG MS. Analyzed the data: S JS MP SBa MS. Wrote the paper: MS CNV.


  1. 1. M'Boneko V, Merker HJ (1988) Development and morphology of the periderm of mouse embryos (days 9–12 of gestation). Acta Anat (Basel) 133: 325–336. doi: 10.1159/000146662
  2. 2. Nakamura H, Yasuda M (1979) An electron microscopic study of periderm cell development in mouse limb buds. Anat Embryol (Berl) 157: 121–132. doi: 10.1007/bf00305153
  3. 3. Kimmel CB, Warga RM, Schilling TF (1990) Origin and organization of the zebrafish fate map. Development 108: 581–594.
  4. 4. Morita K, Furuse M, Yoshida Y, Itoh M, Sasaki H, et al. (2002) Molecular architecture of tight junctions of periderm differs from that of the maculae occludentes of epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 118: 1073–1079. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01774.x
  5. 5. Saathoff M, Blum B, Quast T, Kirfel G, Herzog V (2004) Simultaneous cell death and desquamation of the embryonic diffusion barrier during epidermal development. Exp Cell Res 299: 415–426. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.06.009
  6. 6. Holbrook KA, Odland GF (1975) The fine structure of developing human epidermis: light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy of the periderm. J Invest Dermatol 65: 16–38. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12598029
  7. 7. Weiss LW, Zelickson AS (1975) Embryology of the epidermis: ultrastructural aspects. II. Period of differentiation in the mouse with mammalian comparisons. Acta Derm Venereol 55: 321–329.
  8. 8. Furlow JD, Berry DL, Wang Z, Brown DD (1997) A set of novel tadpole specific genes expressed only in the epidermis are down-regulated by thyroid hormone during Xenopus laevis metamorphosis. Dev Biol 182: 284–298. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.8478
  9. 9. Le Guellec D, Morvan-Dubois G, Sire JY (2004) Skin development in bony fish with particular emphasis on collagen deposition in the dermis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol 48: 217–231. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.15272388
  10. 10. Campinho MA, Silva N, Sweeney GE, Power DM (2007) Molecular, cellular and histological changes in skin from a larval to an adult phenotype during bony fish metamorphosis. Cell Tissue Res 327: 267–284. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0262-9
  11. 11. Senoo M, Pinto F, Crum CP, McKeon F (2007) p63 Is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. Cell 129: 523–536. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.045
  12. 12. Romano RA, Smalley K, Magraw C, Serna VA, Kurita T, et al. (2012) DeltaNp63 knockout mice reveal its indispensable role as a master regulator of epithelial development and differentiation. Development 139: 772–782. doi: 10.1242/dev.071191
  13. 13. Yi R, Poy MN, Stoffel M, Fuchs E (2008) A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing ‘stemness’. Nature 452: 225–229. doi: 10.1038/nature06642
  14. 14. Yang A, Schweitzer R, Sun D, Kaghad M, Walker N, et al. (1999) p63 is essential for regenerative proliferation in limb, craniofacial and epithelial development. Nature 398: 714–718.
  15. 15. Lee H, Kimelman D (2002) A dominant-negative form of p63 is required for epidermal proliferation in zebrafish. Dev Cell 2: 607–616. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00166-1
  16. 16. Bakkers J, Hild M, Kramer C, Furutani-Seiki M, Hammerschmidt M (2002) Zebrafish DeltaNp63 is a direct target of Bmp signaling and encodes a transcriptional repressor blocking neural specification in the ventral ectoderm. Dev Cell 2: 617–627. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00163-6
  17. 17. Sedej S, Rupnik M, Zorec R (2005) Endocytosis-dominated membrane area decrease requires Rab5 protein in rat melanotrophs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1048: 272–280. doi: 10.1196/annals.1342.024
  18. 18. Gauthier NC, Rossier OM, Mathur A, Hone JC, Sheetz MP (2009) Plasma membrane area increases with spread area by exocytosis of a GPI-anchored protein compartment. Mol Biol Cell 20: 3261–3272. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e09-01-0071
  19. 19. Truschel ST, Wang E, Ruiz WG, Leung SM, Rojas R, et al. (2002) Stretch-regulated exocytosis/endocytosis in bladder umbrella cells. Mol Biol Cell 13: 830–846. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-09-0435
  20. 20. Boucrot E, Kirchhausen T (2007) Endosomal recycling controls plasma membrane area during mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 7939–7944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702511104
  21. 21. Lapierre LA, Kumar R, Hales CM, Navarre J, Bhartur SG, et al. (2001) Myosin vb is associated with plasma membrane recycling systems. Mol Biol Cell 12: 1843–1857. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.6.1843
  22. 22. Hales CM, Vaerman JP, Goldenring JR (2002) Rab11 family interacting protein 2 associates with Myosin Vb and regulates plasma membrane recycling. J Biol Chem 277: 50415–50421. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m209270200
  23. 23. Roland JT, Bryant DM, Datta A, Itzen A, Mostov KE, et al. (2011) Rab GTPase-Myo5B complexes control membrane recycling and epithelial polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 2789–2794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010754108
  24. 24. Roland JT, Kenworthy AK, Peranen J, Caplan S, Goldenring JR (2007) Myosin Vb interacts with Rab8a on a tubular network containing EHD1 and EHD3. Mol Biol Cell 18: 2828–2837. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-02-0169
  25. 25. Roland JT, Lapierre LA, Goldenring JR (2009) Alternative splicing in class V myosins determines association with Rab10. J Biol Chem 284: 1213–1223. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m805957200
  26. 26. Fan GH, Lapierre LA, Goldenring JR, Sai J, Richmond A (2004) Rab11-family interacting protein 2 and myosin Vb are required for CXCR2 recycling and receptor-mediated chemotaxis. Mol Biol Cell 15: 2456–2469. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0706
  27. 27. Lise MF, Wong TP, Trinh A, Hines RM, Liu L, et al. (2006) Involvement of myosin Vb in glutamate receptor trafficking. J Biol Chem 281: 3669–3678. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m511725200
  28. 28. Correia SS, Bassani S, Brown TC, Lise MF, Backos DS, et al. (2008) Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation. Nat Neurosci 11: 457–466. doi: 10.1038/nn2063
  29. 29. Wang Z, Edwards JG, Riley N, Provance DW Jr, Karcher R, et al. (2008) Myosin Vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell 135: 535–548. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057
  30. 30. Millman EE, Zhang H, Godines V, Bean AJ, Knoll BJ, et al. (2008) Rapid recycling of beta-adrenergic receptors is dependent on the actin cytoskeleton and myosin Vb. Traffic 9: 1958–1971. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00813.x
  31. 31. Gidon A, Bardin S, Cinquin B, Boulanger J, Waharte F, et al. (2012) A Rab11A/myosin Vb/Rab11-FIP2 complex frames two late recycling steps of langerin from the ERC to the plasma membrane. Traffic 13: 815–833. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2012.01354.x
  32. 32. Chu BB, Ge L, Xie C, Zhao Y, Miao HH, et al. (2009) Requirement of myosin Vb.Rab11a.Rab11-FIP2 complex in cholesterol-regulated translocation of NPC1L1 to the cell surface. J Biol Chem 284: 22481–22490. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.034355
  33. 33. Ishikura S, Klip A (2008) Muscle cells engage Rab8A and myosin Vb in insulin-dependent GLUT4 translocation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C1016–1025. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00277.2008
  34. 34. Nedvetsky PI, Stefan E, Frische S, Santamaria K, Wiesner B, et al. (2007) A Role of myosin Vb and Rab11-FIP2 in the aquaporin-2 shuttle. Traffic 8: 110–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00508.x
  35. 35. Khandelwal P, Prakasam HS, Clayton DR, Ruiz WG, Gallo LI, et al. (2008) A Rab11a-Rab8a-Myo5B network promotes stretch-regulated exocytosis in bladder umbrella cells. Mol Biol Cell 24: 1007–1019. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e12-08-0568
  36. 36. Liu Y, Xu XH, Chen Q, Wang T, Deng CY, et al. (2013) Myosin Vb controls biogenesis of post-Golgi Rab10 carriers during axon development. Nat Commun 4: 2005. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3005
  37. 37. van Diepen MT, Parsons M, Downes CP, Leslie NR, Hindges R, et al. (2009) MyosinV controls PTEN function and neuronal cell size. Nat Cell Biol 11: 1191–1196. doi: 10.1038/ncb1961
  38. 38. Li BX, Satoh AK, Ready DF (2007) Myosin V, Rab11, and dRip11 direct apical secretion and cellular morphogenesis in developing Drosophila photoreceptors. J Cell Biol 177: 659–669. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200610157
  39. 39. Massarwa R, Schejter ED, Shilo BZ (2009) Apical secretion in epithelial tubes of the Drosophila embryo is directed by the Formin-family protein Diaphanous. Dev Cell 16: 877–888. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.04.010
  40. 40. Pocha SM, Shevchenko A, Knust E (2011) Crumbs regulates rhodopsin transport by interacting with and stabilizing myosin V. J Cell Biol 195: 827–838. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201105144
  41. 41. Krauss J, Lopez de Quinto S, Nusslein-Volhard C, Ephrussi A (2009) Myosin-V regulates oskar mRNA localization in the Drosophila oocyte. Curr Biol 19: 1058–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.062
  42. 42. Wu X, Rao K, Bowers MB, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, et al. (2001) Rab27a enables myosin Va-dependent melanosome capture by recruiting the myosin to the organelle. J Cell Sci 114: 1091–1100.
  43. 43. Wu XS, Rao K, Zhang H, Wang F, Sellers JR, et al. (2002) Identification of an organelle receptor for myosin-Va. Nat Cell Biol 4: 271–278. doi: 10.1038/ncb760
  44. 44. Fukuda M, Kuroda TS, Mikoshiba K (2002) Slac2-a/melanophilin, the missing link between Rab27 and myosin Va: implications of a tripartite protein complex for melanosome transport. J Biol Chem 277: 12432–12436. doi: 10.1074/jbc.c200005200
  45. 45. Hume AN, Collinson LM, Hopkins CR, Strom M, Barral DC, et al. (2002) The leaden gene product is required with Rab27a to recruit myosin Va to melanosomes in melanocytes. Traffic 3: 193–202. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.030305.x
  46. 46. Strom M, Hume AN, Tarafder AK, Barkagianni E, Seabra MC (2002) A family of Rab27-binding proteins. Melanophilin links Rab27a and myosin Va function in melanosome transport. J Biol Chem 277: 25423–25430. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m202574200
  47. 47. Westbroek W, Lambert J, Bahadoran P, Busca R, Herteleer MC, et al. (2003) Interactions of human Myosin Va isoforms, endogenously expressed in human melanocytes, are tightly regulated by the tail domain. J Invest Dermatol 120: 465–475. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12068.x
  48. 48. Mercer JA, Seperack PK, Strobel MC, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA (1991) Novel myosin heavy chain encoded by murine dilute coat colour locus. Nature 349: 709–713. doi: 10.1038/349709a0
  49. 49. Pastural E, Barrat FJ, Dufourcq-Lagelouse R, Certain S, Sanal O, et al. (1997) Griscelli disease maps to chromosome 15q21 and is associated with mutations in the myosin-Va gene. Nat Genet 16: 289–292. doi: 10.1038/ng0797-289
  50. 50. Bahadoran P, Busca R, Chiaverini C, Westbroek W, Lambert J, et al. (2003) Characterization of the molecular defects in Rab27a, caused by RAB27A missense mutations found in patients with Griscelli syndrome. J Biol Chem 278: 11386–11392. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m211996200
  51. 51. Van Gele M, Dynoodt P, Lambert J (2009) Griscelli syndrome: a model system to study vesicular trafficking. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 22: 268–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-148x.2009.00558.x
  52. 52. Muller T, Hess MW, Schiefermeier N, Pfaller K, Ebner HL, et al. (2008) MYO5B mutations cause microvillus inclusion disease and disrupt epithelial cell polarity. Nat Genet 40: 1163–1165. doi: 10.1038/ng.225
  53. 53. van Eeden FJ, Granato M, Schach U, Brand M, Furutani-Seiki M, et al. (1996) Genetic analysis of fin formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123: 255–262.
  54. 54. Mattila PE, Youker RT, Mo D, Bruns JR, Cresawn KO, et al. (2012) Multiple biosynthetic trafficking routes for apically secreted proteins in MDCK cells. Traffic 13: 433–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01315.x
  55. 55. Haas P, Gilmour D (2006) Chemokine signaling mediates self-organizing tissue migration in the zebrafish lateral line. Dev Cell 10: 673–680. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.019
  56. 56. Resh MD (1994) Myristylation and palmitylation of Src family members: the fats of the matter. Cell 76: 411–413. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90104-x
  57. 57. Clark BS, Winter M, Cohen AR, Link BA (2011) Generation of Rab-based transgenic lines for in vivo studies of endosome biology in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 240: 2452–2465. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22758
  58. 58. Grant BD, Donaldson JG (2009) Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 597–608. doi: 10.1038/nrm2755
  59. 59. Vonderheit A, Helenius A (2005) Rab7 associates with early endosomes to mediate sorting and transport of Semliki forest virus to late endosomes. PLoS Biol 3: e233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030233
  60. 60. Feng Y, Press B, Wandinger-Ness A (1995) Rab 7: an important regulator of late endocytic membrane traffic. J Cell Biol 131: 1435–1452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1435
  61. 61. Lindsay AJ, McCaffrey MW (2002) Rab11-FIP2 functions in transferrin recycling and associates with endosomal membranes via its COOH-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 277: 27193–27199. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m200757200
  62. 62. Reischauer S, Levesque MP, Nusslein-Volhard C, Sonawane M (2009) Lgl2 executes its function as a tumor suppressor by regulating ErbB signaling in the zebrafish epidermis. PLoS Genet 5: e1000720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000720
  63. 63. Macia E, Ehrlich M, Massol R, Boucrot E, Brunner C, et al. (2006) Dynasore, a cell-permeable inhibitor of dynamin. Dev Cell 10: 839–850. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.002
  64. 64. Morris CE, Homann U (2001) Cell surface area regulation and membrane tension. J Membr Biol 179: 79–102.
  65. 65. Gundelfinger ED, Kessels MM, Qualmann B (2003) Temporal and spatial coordination of exocytosis and endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 127–139. doi: 10.1038/nrm1016
  66. 66. Barg S, Machado JD (2008) Compensatory endocytosis in chromaffin cells. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 192: 195–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01813.x
  67. 67. Khandelwal P, Ruiz WG, Apodaca G (2010) Compensatory endocytosis in bladder umbrella cells occurs through an integrin-regulated and RhoA- and dynamin-dependent pathway. EMBO J 29: 1961–1975. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.91
  68. 68. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, et al. (2005) Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 11594–11599. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502575102
  69. 69. McClatchey AI, Yap AS (2012) Contact inhibition (of proliferation) redux. Curr Opin Cell Biol 24: 685–694. doi: 10.1016/
  70. 70. Provenzano PP, Keely PJ (2011) Mechanical signaling through the cytoskeleton regulates cell proliferation by coordinated focal adhesion and Rho GTPase signaling. J Cell Sci 124: 1195–1205. doi: 10.1242/jcs.067009
  71. 71. Yu FX, Guan KL (2013) The Hippo pathway: regulators and regulations. Genes Dev 27: 355–371. doi: 10.1101/gad.210773.112
  72. 72. Dodd ME, Hatzold J, Mathias JR, Walters KB, Bennin DA, et al. (2009) The ENTH domain protein Clint1 is required for epidermal homeostasis in zebrafish. Development 136: 2591–2600. doi: 10.1242/dev.038448
  73. 73. Heisenberg CP, Bellaiche Y Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153: 948–962. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008
  74. 74. Chen YY, Harris MP, Levesque MP, Nusslein-Volhard C, Sonawane M (2012) Heterogeneity across the dorso-ventral axis in zebrafish EVL is regulated by a novel module consisting of sox, snail1a and max genes. Mech Dev 129: 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2012.03.003
  75. 75. Cooper MS, D'Amico LA (1996) A cluster of noninvoluting endocytic cells at the margin of the zebrafish blastoderm marks the site of embryonic shield formation. Dev Biol 180: 184–198. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0294
  76. 76. Reinshagen K, Naim H, Heusipp G, Zimmer KP (2006) Pathophysiology in Microvillus inclusion disease. Z Gastroenterol 44: 667–671. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926903
  77. 77. Geisler R (2002) Mapping and cloning. In: Nuesslein-Volhard C, Dahm R, editors. Zebrafish: A Practical Approach Oxford Oxford University Press.
  78. 78. Sonawane M, Carpio Y, Geisler R, Schwarz H, Maischein HM, et al. (2005) Zebrafish penner/lethal giant larvae 2 functions in hemidesmosome formation, maintenance of cellular morphology and growth regulation in the developing basal epidermis. Development 132: 3255–3265. doi: 10.1242/dev.01904
  79. 79. Meeker ND, Hutchinson SA, Ho L, Trede NS (2007) Method for isolation of PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. Biotechniques 43: 610, 612, 614. doi: 10.2144/000112619
  80. 80. Sonawane M, Martin-Maischein H, Schwarz H, Nusslein-Volhard C (2009) Lgl2 and E-cadherin act antagonistically to regulate hemidesmosome formation during epidermal development in zebrafish. Development 136: 1231–1240. doi: 10.1242/dev.032508
  81. 81. Song S, Eckerle S, Onichtchouk D, Marrs JA, Nitschke R, et al. (2013) Pou5f1-dependent EGF expression controls E-cadherin endocytosis, cell adhesion, and zebrafish epiboly movements. Dev Cell 24: 486–501. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.01.016
  82. 82. Schulte-Merker S (2002) Looking at Embryos. In: Nuesslein-Volhard C, Dahm R, editors. Zebrafish: A Practical Approach Oxford: Oxford University Press.