The replication terminus region (Ter) of the unique chromosome of most bacteria locates at mid-cell at the time of cell division. In several species, this localization participates in the necessary coordination between chromosome segregation and cell division, notably for the selection of the division site, the licensing of the division machinery assembly and the correct alignment of chromosome dimer resolution sites. The genome of Vibrio cholerae, the agent of the deadly human disease cholera, is divided into two chromosomes, chrI and chrII. Previous fluorescent microscopy observations suggested that although the Ter regions of chrI and chrII replicate at the same time, chrII sister termini separated before cell division whereas chrI sister termini were maintained together at mid-cell, which raised questions on the management of the two chromosomes during cell division. Here, we simultaneously visualized the location of the dimer resolution locus of each of the two chromosomes. Our results confirm the late and early separation of chrI and chrII Ter sisters, respectively. They further suggest that the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system specifically delays chrI Ter sister separation. However, TerI loci remain in the vicinity of the cell centre in the absence of MatP and a genetic assay specifically designed to monitor the relative frequency of sister chromatid contacts during constriction suggest that they keep colliding together until the very end of cell division. In contrast, we found that even though it is not able to impede the separation of chrII Ter sisters before septation, the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system restricts their movement within the cell and permits their frequent interaction during septum constriction.
The genome of Vibrio cholerae is divided into two circular chromosomes, chrI and chrII. ChrII is derived from a horizontally acquired mega-plasmid, which raised questions on the necessary coordination of the processes that ensure its segregation with the cell division cycle. Here, we show that the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system impedes the separation of sister copies of the terminus region of chrI before the initiation of septum constriction. In its absence, however, chrI sister termini remain sufficiently close to mid-cell to be processed by the FtsK cell division translocase. In contrast, we show that MatP cannot impede the separation of chrII sister termini before constriction. However, it restricts their movements within the cell, which allows for their processing by FtsK at the time of cell division. These results suggest that multiple redundant factors, including MatP in the enterobacteriaceae and the Vibrios, ensure that sister copies of the terminus region of bacterial chromosomes remain sufficiently close to mid-cell to be processed by FtsK.
Citation: Demarre G, Galli E, Muresan L, Paly E, David A, Possoz C, et al. (2014) Differential Management of the Replication Terminus Regions of the Two Vibrio cholerae Chromosomes during Cell Division. PLoS Genet 10(9): e1004557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004557
Editor: William F. Burkholder, A*STAR, Singapore
Received: February 4, 2014; Accepted: June 25, 2014; Published: September 25, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Demarre et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: We would like to acknowledge financial support from the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-09-BLAN-0258], from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013 Grant Agreement no. 281590] and from the Fondation Bettencourt Schueller [2012 Coup d'Elan award]. AD was a recipient of a CNRS/DGA PhD fellowship. Deep Sequencing was performed on the IMAGIF platform. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Most bacteria harbour a single chromosome and, in the rare case in which the genetic material is divided on several chromosomes, the extra-numerous ones appear to have derived from horizontally acquired mega-plasmids that subsequently gained essential genes . This is notably the case for Vibrio cholerae, the agent of the deadly human diarrheal disease cholera, whose genome is divided between a 2.961 Mbp ancestral chromosome, chrI, and a 1.072 Mbp plasmid-derived chromosome, chrII . The preferential transcription of chrII genes during colon colonization compared to in vitro growth under aerobic conditions suggests that this genomic organization is important for rapid adaptation to different environments . Likewise, other bacteria harbouring multipartite genomes can adopt several different life cycles , , , : the rhyzobium, the burkholderia and the vibrio, can alternatively spread freely in the environment or interact as symbionts or pathogens with eukaryotic cells; the borrelia are obligate parasites that need to infect several different eukaryotic organisms in the course of their life cycle. Thus, multipartite genomes seem to offer a selective advantage for the adaptation to very different environmental conditions. However, the necessary coordination between replication, chromosome segregation and cell scission raises questions on the management of the different chromosomes of such bacteria.
Bacterial chromosomes harbour a single origin of bidirectional replication and are generally circular. Replication ends in a region opposite of the origin of replication, the terminus region, in which is usually found a specific recombination site dedicated to the resolution of chromosome dimers, dif . Fluorescent microscopic observation of chromosome segregation in mono-chromosomal bacteria revealed that it is concurrent with replication and starts with the active positioning of sister copies of the origin region into opposite cell halves , , . As replication progresses along the left and right chromosomal arms, newly replicated loci are progressively segregated towards their future daughter cell positions. However, the mean time during which sister loci remain together before separation is variable . In particular, sister copies of the terminus region co-localize at mid-cell until the initiation of cell division in E. coli and P. aeruginosa , , , . This mode of segregation can participate in the coordination between chromosome segregation and cell division. Indeed, nucleoid occlusion factors impede the assembly of the cell division machinery until a time when the only genomic DNA left at mid-cell consist of the sister copies of the terminus region in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , ; the long co-localization of sister termini at mid-cell is at least in part dictated by the MatP/matS macrodomain organisation system in E. coli , ; a DNA translocase, FtsK, which is recruited to mid-cell as part of the divisome and which pumps chromosomal DNA in the orientation dictated by repeated polar motifs that point towards dif, the KOPS, promotes the orderly segregation of the DNA within the terminus region of E. coli chromosome , , . One of the functions of FtsK is to control the resolution of chromosome dimers, which result from homologous recombination events between circular sister chromatids, by the addition of a cross-over between sister dif sites at the time of constriction . FtsK is also thought to participate in sister chromatid decatenation ,  and to create a checkpoint to delay constriction until sister terminus regions have been fully segregated , , .
V. cholerae chrI and chrII are circular and harbour a single dif site in the region opposite of their origin of replication, dif1 and dif2, respectively (Figure 1A, ). Segregation of the two chromosomes is concurrent with replication and both chromosomes adopt a longitudinal organization within the cell . However, chrII is replicated late in the C period of the cell cycle, when most of chrI has been replicated, and the initiation of its segregation is consequently delayed . In addition, the origin region of chrI, OriI, locates to the old pole of newborn cells and one OriI sister migrates to the other pole after replication (Figure 1A, ). The origin region of chrII, OriII, locates to mid-cell in newborn cells and the two OriII sisters migrate towards the ¼ and ¾ positions after replication (Figure 1A, ). This is at least in part dictated by the presence of a partition machinery of a chromosomal type on chrI, parABS1, and a partition system that groups with plasmid and phage machineries on chrII, parABS2 (Figure 1A, , , ). The last chromosomal regions to be segregated are the terminus regions of chrI and chrII, TerI and TerII, respectively (Figure 1A, ). Both TerI and TerII locate at or close to the new pole in newborn cells (Figure 1A, ). Replication termination of the two V. cholerae chromosomes is synchronous  and unreplicated TerI and TerII are recruited to mid-cell at approximately the same time (Figure 1A, ). V. cholerae is closely related to E. coli in the phylogenetic tree of bacteria and its genome harbour the same dam co-occurring DNA maintenance machineries as E. coli . This includes a unique E. coli MatP ortholog and the presence of cognate matS sites in both TerI and TerII. In addition, a common pair of tyrosine recombinases, XerC and XerD, serves to resolve dimers of each of the two V. cholerae chromosomes despite the sequence divergence of dif1 and dif2 . Dimer resolution is controlled by a unique E. coli FtsK ortholog, whose translocation activity is oriented by KOPS motifs that point towards the dimer resolution site of each of the two chromosomes . By analogy to E. coli, MatP is thought to maintain sister copies of TerI and TerII at mid-cell and FtsK to promote the orderly segregation of the DNA within TerI and TerII. Correspondingly, the separation of sister copies of a locus situated at 40 kbp from dif1 seemed coordinated with cell division (Figure 1A, , ). However, sister copies of a locus situated at 49 kbp from dif2 separated before cell division, which questioned the role of FtsK and MatP on TerII segregation (Figure 1A, ).
A. Schematic representation of the two sister chromatids of each of the two V. cholerae chromosomes during septation. B. and D. Relative position of dif1 (in black) and dif2 (in red) along the long axis of the cell as a function of cell length in WT (B) or ΔmatP (D) background. C. and E. Frequency of cells with separated dif1 (in black) and dif2 (in red) sisters as a function of cell length in WT (C) or ΔmatP (E) background. The plain red and black lines show the data for the bins containing at least 30 cells (see Figure S1); the dashed grey lines show the data for bins containing 3 to 29 cells (see Figure S1). F. Upper panel, relative number of cells with a single dif1 and dif2 spot (in purple), a single dif1 spot and two dif2 spots or a single dif2 spot and two dif1 spots (in blue) or two dif1 spots and two dif2 spots (in yellow). Cells without either of these numbers of spots were plotted in the ‘other’ category (in red). Middle panel, in the category of cells with 3 spots, relative number of cells with the depicted dispositions of spots in WT or ΔmatP background. Lower panel, in the category of cells with 4 spots, relative number of cells with the depicted dispositions of spots in WT or ΔmatP background. G. Interfocal distance of the sister copies of the dif locus of each of the two V. cholerae chromosomes, (dif1 in black and dif2 in red), as a function of cell length, in WT or ΔmatP background.
The aim of this work was to identify the contribution of MatP to the segregation dynamics of TerI and TerII. We show by replication profiling that dif1 and dif2 are located next to the replication terminus of chrI and chrII, respectively. Simultaneous visualization of the positions of dif1 and dif2 within the cell then allowed us to confirm the late and early separation of TerI and TerII, respectively. However, we show that TerII sisters keep colliding with each other at mid-cell during constriction by genetically probing the relative frequency of sister chromatid contacts occurring at mid-cell at the time of cell division along the two chromosomes and by time-lapse fluorescent microscopy. We further show that the frequency of these collisions depends on the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system, possibly because it restricts the movements of TerII within the cell. We also show that MatP promotes the late mid-cell co-localization of TerI sisters. However, TerI loci remain in the vicinity of the cell centre and sister chromatid contacts remain frequent in its absence.
Early TerII and delayed TerI segregation
Replication profiling of V. cholerae cells by deep sequencing indicated that termination most frequently occurred at a distance of ∼90 kbp and ∼70 kbp from the reference loci that had been used by Srivastava et al. for the simultaneous visualization of the positions of TerI and TerII (Figure S1A, ). It was therefore possible that the behaviour of these loci did not fully reflect TerI and TerII segregation dynamics. To confirm the segregation pattern of the terminus regions of chrI and chrII, we simultaneously visualized the intracellular location of dif1 and dif2 in cells that were exponentially growing in minimal media. We used the lacO/LacI-mCherry system to label the dif1 locus and the pMT1 parS/yGFP-ParB system to label the dif2 locus. Cells were classified according to their length in bins of 0.25 µm. They had a median length of 3.2 µm (Figure S2A). The smallest cells, i.e. the youngest cells, contained a single dif1 spot at one of the two cell poles (Figure 1B). This pole, which results from the previous division event, is hereafter referred to as the new pole. The preferential localization of dif1 towards the new pole was used to orientate the cells. A single dif2 spot was also observed in the youngest cells (Figure 1B). This spot was located in the younger cell half, at an intermediate position between the dif1 spot and the middle of the cell (Figure 1B). The polarity of the dif1 and dif2 spots decreased as a function of cell elongation and the median position of each spot reached mid-cell in cells of an intermediate length (Figure 1B). The majority of the longest cells, i.e. the closest to cell division, displayed a single dif1 spot, which was located at mid-cell and was flanked by two dif2 spots (Figure 1B). Indeed, <15% of the cells from the 4.25 µm–4.5 µm bin displayed two dif1 spots whereas >80% of them displayed two dif2 spots (Figure 1C). In addition, the proportion of cells containing two dif2 spots reached 100% in the cells that were longer than 4.5 µm whereas only 50% of these cells displayed two dif1 spots (Figure 1C, grey points). Marker frequency analysis indicated that the earlier timing of appearance of cells with two dif2 foci was not due to an earlier timing of replication of dif2 compared to dif1 (Figure S1A). The same pattern of segregation was observed when the dif1 and dif2 labelling systems were switched, excluding any possible artefact linked to the visualization strategy (Figure S3). Finally, dif2 sisters were found to segregate further away from each other and from mid-cell than dif1 sisters (Figure 1G). Taken together, these results suggest that in the vast majority of cases TerII sisters separated before cell division whereas TerI sister separation was delayed until the end of cell division.
MatP impedes dif1 sister separation and constrains dif2 positioning
We next investigated the influence of the MatP/matS macrodomain organization system on TerI and TerII segregation. V. cholerae cells in which MatP was disrupted were slightly longer than wild-type cells. In minimal medium, they had a median length of 3.77 µm (Figure S2B). Nevertheless, growth competition indicated that they lost less than 0.23% of fitness per generation (Figure S4). The smallest cells had a single dif1 and a single dif2 spot, which were both positioned closer to mid-cell than in wild-type cells (Figure 1D). This was accompanied by an increase in position variability (Figure 1D). As a consequence, mid-cell recruitment was no longer directly observable in cells of intermediate lengths (Figure 1D). In addition, the timing of separation of dif1 spots was now very similar to the timing of separation of dif2 spots (Figure 1E). Marker frequency analysis indicated that this was not due to a change in the relative replication timing of dif1 and dif2 (Figure S1B). Many cells of intermediate length now displayed two dif1 and two dif2 spots and most of the cells of the following bins had two dif1 and two dif2 spots (Figure 1E). This was directly reflected in the proportion of cells displaying a single dif1 spot and a single dif2 spot and the proportion of cells with two dif1 and two dif2 spots in the entire population (Figure 1F, number of spots). The separation of dif2 sisters remained slightly ahead of the separation of dif1 sisters (Figure 1E), which was reflected in the higher proportion of cells harbouring a single dif1 spot and two dif2 spots than cells harbouring a single dif2 spot and two dif1 spots (Figure 1F, 3 spots disposition). However, the disposition of spots became more random and many cells now displayed dif2 spots more centrally located than dif1 spots (Figure 1F, 3 spots disposition and 4 spots disposition). Finally, sister dif sites migrated to opposite cell halves after their separation (Figure 1D) and the distances between the sisters of both sites were similar (Figure 1G). Taken together, these results suggested that MatP contributed to the precise positioning of TerI before and after replication and that it delayed the separation of TerI sisters to the time of cell division. MatP also contributed to the precise positioning of TerII. However, it was unable to impede TerII sisters from separating before septum constriction.
Monitoring TerI and TerII management during septum constriction
As the densities of matS sites in TerI and TerII are very similar, we were intrigued by the apparent inability of MatP to block TerII sister separation. Lesterlin et al. designed an assay based on the interruption of the lacZ reporter gene by two copies of loxP to detect sister chromatid contacts (SCC) behind replication forks . The assay was based on the proximity of the loxP sites: the cleavage points of the Cre recombinases on each strand of the tandem sites were separated by only 55 bp to prevent intra-molecular recombination. As a result, a functional lacZ ORF could only be reconstructed via intermolecular recombination events (Figure 2A). As dif-recombination is under the control of FtsK in V. cholerae , which was expected to restrict it to mid-cell and to the time of septum constriction , we reasoned that 55 bp dif-cassettes could be used to monitor the proximity of TerI and TerII sisters to the cell division machinery at the time of constriction (Figure 2B).
A. Scheme of the different site-specific recombination products that can be obtained when intramolecular recombination is impeded. B. Schematic representation of the 55 bp dif-recombination cassettes and the Xer recombination control set up. The orange arrow represents the lacZ gene disrupted by the two dif sites (red triangle). Expression of the xerC gene (green arrow) is under the positive control of the arabinose promoter, PBAD, and the negative control of the E. coli lacZ promoter, PLac. C. dif1 and dif2 sequence divergence. The DNA binding arms of XerC and XerD are shown. Bases that differ in dif1 and dif2 are shown in red and blue, respectively. D. Reconstitution of a functional lacZ gene depends on XerC and FtsK. Results from at least three independent experiments. E. Recombination between dif sites harboured on different chromosomes does not perturb the SCC detection. Schematic representation of the genome of a strain harbouring lac2dif1 on chrII. No intrachromosomal recombination can occur between lac2dif1 and dif2 because of sequence divergence. The influence of chrI dif1 on chrII lac2dif1 recombination was tested by comparing results obtained in a strain in which dif1 was deleted. Results from at least three independent experiments. Legends as in Figure 1A. Red triangle: dif1; blue triangle: dif2.
We engineered a strain in which XerC production was under the control of the arabinose promoter to permit the stable inheritance of dif-cassettes. To help repress any leaky XerC production, we inserted the E. coli lacZ promoter and the E. coli lacI repressor gene in anti-orientation at the end of the xerC ORF. We also replaced the ATG translation initiation codon by the less favourable TTG codon and removed the ribosomal binding site (Figure 2B).
The dif sites harboured by the first and second chromosomes of the El Tor N16961 strain, dif1 and dif2, possess divergent overlap regions (Figure 2C, , ). To compare the excision of 55 bp dif1- and dif2-cassettes (lac2dif1 and lac2dif2), we inserted them at the same genomic position, in place of the dif locus of chromosome II, and monitored the frequency of full blue colonies that were obtained three hours after the induction of XerC production (Figure 2C). Recombination worked well for both dif sites (Figure 2D). In both cases, blue colony formation strictly depended on XerC production and on the presence of a fully functional ftsK allele (Figure 2D).
Little or no recombination can occur between dif1 and dif2 thanks to their sequence divergence (Figure 2C). The use of lac2dif2 on chrI and lac2dif1 on chrII thus prevented any risk of Xer-mediated intrachromosomal rearrangements due to recombination between the dif sites of the cassette and the dimer resolution site of the chromosome during the course of the experiment (Figure 2E). Therefore, the dimer resolution site of the chromosome could be left, which avoided any artefact in the measured excision frequencies linked to the formation of chromosome dimers by recombination between sister copies of the cassettes (Figure S5). The dif sites of the cassettes used on each of the two V. cholerae chromosomes are identical to the dimer resolution site of the other chromosome. However, this site did not influence the proportion of blue colonies that were formed (Figure 2E and Figure S6).
Both intramolecular and intermolecular recombination events can generate single dif site products. In contrast, three dif site products can only be generated via intermolecular recombination. Such products are transient because they can be converted to single dif products by subsequent intramolecular recombination (Figure 2A). Nevertheless, we could detect their appearance with 55 bp cassettes, demonstrating that recombination occurred via SCC (Figure 3A). As a point of comparison, we engineered 1 kbp dif-cassettes, a distance sufficient for intramolecular recombination. With such cassettes, we did not observe any intermolecular recombination intermediates, suggesting that 1 kbp cassette excision mainly resulted from intramolecular recombination events on separate chromatids (Figure 3A).
A. Structural control of Xer recombination. Southern blot showing the different recombination products obtained with 55 bp- and 1 kbp- cassettes inserted at the dif1 locus. B. FtsK-YFP localization. The white arrow indicates a cell in which FtsK is located at the septum; the white arrowhead shows a cell in which FtsK is located at the new pole. C. Temporal control of Xer recombination. Upper panels: southern blot showing the excision of a 1 kbp cassette inserted at the dif1 locus, without or with cephalexin treatment. t: time of the experiment; ex.: excision frequency. Lower panel: snapshot showing that cephalexin treatment results in filamentation but does not prevent FtsK localization to mid-cell. D. RecA-independent recombination between dif2 sites inserted at the dif1 locus.
FtsK-YFP localized to mid-cell in long cells (Figure 3B, white arrow) and at one of the two poles in short cells (Figure 3B, white arrow head). This was reminiscent of the pattern of localization of the cell division machinery of Caulobacter crescentus, which assembles at mid-cell but remains bound to the new pole after cell scission . Time-lapse observations confirmed that such a scenario applied to V. cholerae FtsK, demonstrating that it assembled at mid-cell as part of the cell division machinery (Figure S7A). In addition, treating cells with cephalexin, which blocks septum constriction, led to a dramatic reduction in the level of dif-recombination without affecting the recruitment of FtsK to the cell division apparatus (Figure 3C). No loss of cell viability was observed during the course of the cephalexin treatment (Figure S7B). We conclude that dif-recombination occurs during or shortly after septum constriction in V. cholerae.
Finally, deletion of recA did not affect the proportion of excision events that could be detected using 55 bp- and 1 kbp-cassettes, indicating that activation of dif-recombination was independent from chromosome dimer formation in V. cholerae (Figure 3D). This result is strikingly different from what is observed using dif-cassettes in E. coli , . The reasons for this difference are the subject of another study (Gally, Midonet, Demarre and Barre, unpublished results).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the proportion of blue colonies formed following lac2dif1 and lac2dif2 recombination events can be used as a relative measure of the respective frequency of contacts between monomeric sister chromatids that occur at mid-cell at the time of septum constriction in V. cholerae.
High frequency of TerI and TerII SCC during septum constriction
Cells in which lac2dif2 were inserted in the immediate vicinity of dif1 yielded a high level (∼60%) of blue colonies, demonstrating dif1 SCC during constriction (Figure 4A), in agreement with the co-localization of dif1 sisters (Figure 1). However, interchromatid recombination dropped rapidly when lac2dif2 was not in the immediate vicinity of the dif1 locus (Figure 4A). The frequency of blue colony formation did not diminish in cells in which recA was deleted, confirming that 55 bp cassette recombination on chrI was not restricted to chromosome dimers (Figure S8A).
A. V. cholerae chrI and chrII maps centred on their dif locus. Red bars: positions of lac2dif cassettes; blue disks: positions of matS sites; light grey disks: positions of parS2 sites; dark grey rectangle: recent chromosomal insertions (CTX: Integrative Mobile Elements Exploiting Xer; SI: superintegron). Only 1 Mbp of chrI is depicted. B. Relative frequency of SCC during septation as a function of the position of the distance from the dif locus (in kbp). Results from at least three independent experiments. C. Influence of MatP on sister chromatid contacts. Results from at least three independent experiments. The dashed grey curves show the results obtained in B.
Strikingly, we obtained a very high proportion of blue colonies (∼90%) when lac2dif1 was inserted at dif2 (Figure 4B) despite the apparent early separation of dif2 sisters (Figure 1). In addition, blue colony formation remained high (∼45%) within a 160 kbp region surrounding dif2, from a position at 9 kb on the left of the dif locus to 152 kb on the right of it (Figure 4B). The same results were obtained after recA deletion, confirming that TerII SCCs were unlikely due to chromosome dimers (Figure S8A). Taken together those results suggested that dif2 sisters contacted each other at mid-cell at the time of cell division as frequently as dif1 sisters, despite their apparent early separation.
MatP drives TerII sister contacts during septum constriction
On chrII, the extent of the region displaying a high frequency of SCC at the time of septum constriction corresponded to the putative MatP domain (Figure 4B). The only notable exception was next to a matS site that is isolated from the rest of the matS region by the V. cholerae superintegron (Figure 4B). Correspondingly, we observed more than a 4-fold reduction in blue colony formation within TerII upon matP disruption (Figure 4C). Indeed, dif2 was the only locus where cassette excision remained above the background level (Figure 4C). Cassette excision remained independent from chromosome dimer formation (Figure S8B). In contrast, the disruption of matP only had a very modest, albeit significant, effect on SCCs within TerI (Figure 4C). The remaining SCCs were still independent from homologous recombination (Figure S8B). Correspondingly, SCCs occurred in a much smaller region than the putative MatP domain on chrI (Figure 4B). Taken together, these results suggested that MatP was the main contributor to TerII SCC occurring at mid-cell at the time of cell division.
Direct time-lapse observation of TerII SCC during cell division
The high frequency of SCCs detected at dif2 with our genetic assay suggested that dif2 sisters frequently collided at mid-cell during septum constriction despite their early separation. To directly demonstrate that such collisions occurred, we followed the segregation dynamics of dif2 sisters by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy. We expected collisions to be transient because two dif2 spots were observed in almost all of the wild type cells longer than 4.5 µm (Figure 1 and Figure S9A). Therefore, we reasoned that short time intervals had to be used between each image acquisition. However, a balance had to be achieved between the detection of the supposedly transient dif2 collisions and the fraction of the cell cycle during which dif2 spots could be tracked in any given cell due to photobleaching. With 30 s time intervals, dif2 foci could be observed for 100 min.
A total of 74 wild-type cells were followed, out of which 44 showed a complete cell division event. In 42 of these cells, i.e. in ∼95% of the observed cell division events, dif2 sisters separated before septum invagination, in agreement with our snapshot analysis. However, dif2 sister collisions were frequent (Figure 5A and Movie S1). As a result, dif2 sisters were found to co-localize at mid-cell at some stage of the cell constriction process in 70% of the cells, which fits with the high frequency of dif2 SCCs observed with the genetic assay (Figure 5A and Movie S1). On average, 3.2 collisions were observed after the initial separation of the dif2 sisters and before cell fission. In the majority of cases, re-joining of the dif2 sisters was transient, i.e. co-localization was only observed during 2 consecutive frames. In some instances, however, dif2 sisters remained co-localized for several minutes.
(A) WT cells. (B) matP− cells. The time before or after the cell division event is indicated in minutes. The phase images obtained from the BF images, the fluorescence images and the merge are shown. The scale bar corresponds to 2 µm. Other examples are presented in Movie S1 and 2.
We also followed 131 matP− cells, out of which 30 displayed a complete analysable cell division event. In all of these cells, dif2 sisters separated before septum invagination (Figure 5A and Movie S2). The positions of the two dif2 sisters were no longer restricted to the ¼–¾ cell region and, in several cases, one of the two dif2 spots located near the old pole at the time of division (Figure 5A and Movie S2). Indeed, only 0.6 collisions were observed on average in each cell after the initial separation of the dif2 sisters and before cell fission. These events lasted for a single frame in the vast majority of cases. Finally, co-localization of the dif2 sisters during septum constriction was only observed once, which fits with the loss of dif2 SCCs monitored with the genetic assay.
Taken together, these results suggested that MatP allowed FtsK to process dif2 sisters during cell division by restricting the range of their movements to the ¼–¾ cell region and that other factors played a similar role for dif1 sisters in its absence.
In the present study, we investigated the positioning of the replication terminus regions of the two V. cholerae chromosomes using a combination of two techniques. On one hand, we directly visualized the positioning of the chromosome dimer resolution locus of each of the two chromosomes by snapshot and time-lapse microscopy (Figure 1 and Figure 5). On the other hand, we monitored the proximity of these loci using Xer recombination between sister dif sites as a genetic reporter (Figure 4). The requirement for a direct contact between the Xer recombinases and the FtsK cell division protein for recombination to occur ensured that sister sites were recombined at mid-cell (Figure 2 and 3). The requirement for constriction initiation ensured that they were recombined at the time of septum constriction (Figure 3). The high frequency of intermolecular recombination events at the chromosome I dif locus (Figure 4) could be due to the late separation of the two sister chromatids at this particular location (Figure 1 and Figure 5). Intermolecular recombination events at the chromosome II dif locus could also happen before the sisters segregated, i.e. after dif duplication but before replication completion and/or when separated sisters were still trapped together by catenation links. However, this can only account for a limited of number of recombination events since snapshot analysis and time-lapse microscopy suggested that sisters of the chromosome II dif locus separated before septum constriction in ∼95% of the dividing cells (Figure 1 and Figure 5). Thus, the high frequency of recombination events between chromosome II dif sisters is probably mainly linked to collisions events that occurred their initial separation (Figure 4).
MatP-dependent coordination of TerII segregation with cell division
Possibly the most striking observation of our study was that TerII sisters kept colliding against each other at mid-cell after their initial separation in the cell cycle, up to and after the initiation of the constriction process (Figure 4 and 5). During the three hours of our genetic assays, cells underwent ∼8 divisions, as judged by the number of colony forming units at the beginning and at the end of the experiments. Therefore, the ∼90% frequency of blue colony formation that we observed with a recombination inserted at dif2 corresponded to a rate of 25% of β-galactosidase+ cell formation per generation. As only one out of the two possible intermolecular recombination events could yield β-galactosidase+ cells (Figure 2A), this result suggested that >50% of SCC occurred between TerII sisters during each cell division event (Figure 4). Moreover, we observed the same frequency of blue colony formation with the lacZdif2 probe when it was inserted at the dif2 locus on chrII (Figure 2D, lac2dif2) and when it was inserted at the dif1 locus on chrI (Figure 4B, dif1 locus), suggesting that SCCs at cell division were as frequent within TerII as within TerI. Accordingly, frequent collisions of dif2 sisters were observed at the time of cell division when following the growth of individual cells by fluorescence microscopy with 30 s time intervals (Figure 5). Interchromatid recombination events during constriction were observed in a specific 160 kb region of chrII, which corresponded to the putative MatP domain of the chromosome (Figure 4). The relative frequency of interchromatid recombination curve consisted of a plateau with a central peak at the dif2 locus (Figure 4). Our results suggested the plateau was due to the action of the MatP/matS system (Figure 4).
Management of TerI during cell division
Our snapshot analysis of the positioning of dif1 in wild type and matP− cells indicated that MatP was a major contributor to the organization and management of TerI at the time of cell division, as observed in E. coli (Figure 1). However, the relative frequency of interchromatid recombination curve on chrI simply consisted of a sharp peak centred on dif1 with no plateau in the MatP region (Figure 4). In addition, the relative frequency of SCCs was not dramatically affected in matP− cells (Figure 4). This is in sharp contrast to what we could have expected based on the role of MatP in the formation of a FtsK loading region in E. coli . Taken together, these observations suggest that other factors than MatP contribute to the management of dif1 sisters at the time of cell division, which partially masked its action in our genetic assay. We are currently investigating the relative contribution of likely candidates for TerI mid-cell localization using the power of our SCC assay. We think that these factors might be common to other bacteria in which sister copies of the terminus regions remain at mid-cell for a long period during cell division, such as P. aeruginosa and C. crescentus. However, they could not, or might not yet, be adapted to the management of the recently acquired chrII of V. cholerae. As a result, the MatP/matS system was left as the sole contributor for TerII SCCs during cell division, which helped reveal its action.
MatP mechanism of Ter organization
The disruption of matP had a profound impact on the subcellular localization of dif1 and dif2 (Figure 1). In particular, MatP seemed to impede the separation of dif1 sisters until cell division (Figure 1). MatP is able to create bridges between two matS sites . However, we do not think that sister chromatids are tethered together by such bridges since MatP did not impede the separation of dif2 sisters (Figure 1). Careful analysis of the location of dif1 and dif2 spots in wild type and matP− cells rather suggested that MatP helped create a molecular leash that confined Ter regions in the ¼–¾ portion of the cell: even though the median positions of dif2 sisters in the cell population indicated their separation before cell division, they did not migrate very far apart from each other and away from mid-cell (Figure 1). In particular, ∼90% of dif2 spots were located at a distance of less than a quarter of the cell length in cells longer than 4.5 µm (Figure S9A). Results from our genetic assay suggested that the movements of such sister loci around the median position probably allowed for their frequent collision at mid-cell at the time of cell division. Even though their medians were equivalent, the distributions of the distances between dif2 sisters in wild type and matP− cells were markedly different (Figure 1G). Indeed, in matP− cells longer than 4.5 µm, only ∼57% of the dif2 spots remained in the ¼–¾ portion of the cell (Figure S9B). This might be sufficient to explain a large drop in sister collisions. In contrast, ∼83% of dif1 spots remained in the ¼–¾ portion of the cell, which might explain the low impact of the matP disruption on the frequency of SCC (Figure S9C and S9D). Further work will be required to investigate the molecular nature of the MatP leash. An attractive possibility would be that MatP restrains the movement of catenation loops between the two circular chromatid sisters by binding together the matS sites of each sister chromatid.
Ter positioning as a key feature of the bacterial cell cycle
Our results suggest that multiple redundant factors, including MatP in the enterobacteriaceae and the Vibrios, ensure that sister copies of the terminus region of bacterial chromosomes remain sufficiently close to mid-cell to be processed by FtsK. In this regard, it is remarkable to observe that, even though initiation of chrII replication responds to the same global cell cycle regulatory networks than chrI initiation , it occurs at a later time point in the cell cycle , which results in synchronous chrI and chrII replication termination (Figure S1, ). This is likely to participate in delaying TerII sister separation until the time of cell division. We observed that matP− cells were longer than wild type cells in agreement with the notion that coordination of cell division and chromosome segregation is a key feature of the bacterial cell cycle (Figure S1). What is the functional role of this coordination? The late segregation of the terminus region might facilitate the action of FtsK on unresolved catenation links or chromosome dimers. Under laboratory conditions, we did not observe any significant chromosome dimer resolution defect (Figure S4). However, these results have to be interpreted with caution since the disorganization induced by the absence of MatP should only slightly delay the time required for FtsK to bring together sister dif sites.
Strains and plasmids
Genetic engineering methods are described in Text S1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Tables S1 and S2, respectively. All V. cholerae strains were derivatives of the El Tor N16961 strain.
Fluorescent microscopy observations
A lacO array was inserted adjacent to dif1 and a PMT1 parS was inserted adjacent to dif2. LacIE.coli-mCherry and yGFP-ParBpMT1 were produced via the leaky expression of a synthetic operon under the E. coli lacZ promoter that was inserted at the V. cholerae lacZ locus. A C-terminal fusion between FtsK and a yellow fluorescent protein, FtsK-YFP, was inserted in place of the endogenous V. cholerae ftsK allele to visualize its localisation. Protocols for Microscopy are detailed in Text S1. The snapshot images were analysed using the Matlab-based sofware MicrobeTracker , . Details for the analysis are described in .
Time-lapse fluorescent microscopy
For bright field (BF) and fluorescence microscopy 2 µl of an exponentially growing culture sample were placed on a microscope slide coated with a thin agarose layer (1%) made using the growth medium. The slide was incubated at 30°C during the images acquisition. The images were acquired with an Evolve 512 EMCCD camera attached to an Axio Observe spinning disk from Zeiss and recorded every 30 seconds with step size of 0.4 µm in the Z-axis (3 images were acquired for each channel). The BF image 3 is subtracted from the BF image 1 to obtain the phase image.
Blue colony formation assay: 0.2 mM IPTG were used to repress xerC transcription. 0.1% arabinose was used to produce XerC. Freshly grown cultures were diluted in 5 mL of LB supplemented with arabinose to reach 0.02 of optical density at 600 nm. They were incubated for 180 mn at 37°C with shaking. Serial dilutions of the cells were plated on LB agar plates supplemented with X-gal and IPTG before and after the induction of recombination.
Southern blot assay: Cephalexin was added at the final concentration of 10 µg/ml at the same time as the arabinose. Cells were collected at the beginning of the incubation and after 40, 80 and 120 mn for genomic DNA extraction. Recombination products were analysed an EcoRV/HphI digest and 1 kbp fragment corresponding to the lacZ promoter as a probe. Signals were detected using a Typhoon instrument and quantified using the IQT 7.0 software (GE Healthcare).
Replication profiling of the two V. cholerae chromosomes in WT (A) and matP− (B) cells. To compare the timing of replication of chrI and chrII in the two genetic backgrounds, we calculated the relative frequency of uniquely mapping sequence tags within the genomic DNA of exponentially growing (replicating) cells in 1000 bp windows, i.e. the number of uniquely mapping sequence tags within each 1000 bp window divided by the total number of sequence that were uniquely mapped in the entire genome . Left panels: chrI replication profiling; Right panels: chrII replication profiling. The position of the terminus is indicated by two facing red triangles. A yellow sun indicates the location of the single locus that had been so far visualized in the Ter of each of the two chromosomes.
Cell distribution in the WT strain (A) of V. cholerae or its matP− mutant (B). Cells were classified according to their length in bins of 0.25 µm. The dashed line shows the limit of 30 cells under which data was plotted in grey elsewhere in the manuscript.
Differences in the pattern of segregation of Ter I and Ter II are not due to the fluorescent microscopy visualization tools. The fluorescent markers that were used in Fig. 1 to label the dif1 and dif2 loci were switched: the dif1 locus was visualized using the YGFP–ParBPMT1/parS system and the dif2 locus was visualized with the lacO/LacI system. A. Relative position of dif1 (in black) and dif2 (in red) along the long axis of the cell as a function of cell length. B. Frequency of cells with separated dif1 (in black) and dif2 (in red) sisters as a function of cell length. The plain red and black lines show the data for the bins containing at least 30 cells; the dashed grey lines show the data for bins containing 3 to 29 cells. C. Interfocal distance of the sister copies of the dif locus of each of the two V. cholerae chromosomes, (dif1 in black and dif2 in red). D. Cell distribution. Cells were classified according to their length in bins of 0.25 µm. The dashed line shows the limit of 30 cells under which data was plotted.
Graphic representation of growth competition between mutant strains of V. cholerae and a WT strain. The ratio of the mutant against its parental strain is plotted as a function of the number of generation. Cells were grown in parallel at 30°C with a 10−4 or a 10−5 dilution every 12 h for 5 days. Cell dilutions were plated every 24 h on cognate antibiotic plates to determine the number of CFU of the mutant versus the WT strain. The generation time between every time point was calculated from these numbers. The CFU ratio between mutant and its parental strain varies with the number of generations and it can be used to determine the loss of fitness of every mutant. The fitness loss for matP− cells was ≅0.23% (blue), for Δdif1 cells it was ≅6.9% (red), for Δdif1 matP− it was ≅5.9% (orange), for Δdif2 it was ≅2% (green) and for Δdif2 matP− it was ≅1.5 (yellow).
Schematic representation of the possible intermolecular recombination events between lac2dif1 cassettes harboured on TerII sister chromatids. Green dot: oriII. Blue triangle: dif2. Red triangle: dif1. The orange arrow represents the lacZ gene disrupted by the two dif1 sites (lac2dif1) or three dif1 sites (lac3dif1). The blue arrows show the functional lacZ gene after the deletion of one dif1 site (lac1dif1).
Recombination between dif sites harboured on different chromosomes does not perturb the SCC detection. Schematic representation of the genome of a strain harbouring lac2dif2 on chI. No intrachromosomal recombination can occur between lac2dif2 and dif1 because of sequence incompatibility. The influence of chII dif2 on chI lac2dif2 recombination was tested by comparing results obtained in a strain in which dif2 was deleted. Results from at least three independent experiments. oriI represented with an orange dot and oriII by a green dot. dif1 is represented by a red triangle and dif2 with a blue triangle, the orange arrow show the lacZ gene disrupted by the two dif1 sites.
(A) FtsK targets to midcell prior to cell division. Localization of FtsK-YFP in cells seen by video microscopy. The time before or after the first cell division event is indicated in minutes. (B) 2 h cephalexin treatment does not affect V. cholerae survival. Cells were grown without (plain line) or with (dashed line) cephalexin and spread on LB agar plates for cfu determination every 40 min. When cells were treated with cephalexin, the number of cfu didn't increase (as expected since cells can't divide) but remained constant.
Dimer formation does not influence SCC in V. cholerae. (A) Dimer formation does not influence SCC at dif2 in a WT background. The same is true at dif1 (Figure 3D). (B) Dimer formation does not influence SCC at dif1 and dif2 in a matP− background. Results from at least three independent experiments.
Localization of dif1 and dif2 in WT and matP− strains of V. cholerae. dif1 (A and C) and dif2 (B and D) were localized in exponentially growing WT cells (GDV552; A and B) and matP− cells (GDV564, C and D). The localization was done using the lacO/lacI-mcherry system at dif1 and YGFP–ParBPMT1/parS system at dif2. Plots show focus relative positions in cells with one (red) focus, and two (blue and black) foci as a function of the cell length.
Choreography of dif2 sisters in WT cells seen by video-microscopy. Cells were grown on a thin agarose layer (1%) at 30°C. Images were acquired every 30 seconds. Movies are shown at a rate of 4 frames/sec.
Choreography of dif2 sisters in matP− cells seen by video-microscopy. Cells were grown on a thin agarose layer (1%) at 30°C. Images were acquired every 30 seconds. Movies are shown at a rate of 4 frames/sec.
We wish to thank M. Blokesh and J. Bischerour for V. cholerae chromosomal engineering tools and N. Kleckner and B. Michel for helpful discussions.
Conceived and designed the experiments: GD CP FXB. Performed the experiments: GD EG CP AD EP. Analyzed the data: GD CP LM EG FXB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GD CP LM EG EP AD FXB. Wrote the paper: GD CP FXB.
- 1. Egan ES, Fogel MA, Waldor MK (2005) Divided genomes: negotiating the cell cycle in prokaryotes with multiple chromosomes. Mol Microbiol 56: 1129–1138.
- 2. Trucksis M, Michalski J, Deng YK, Kaper JB (1998) The Vibrio cholerae genome contains two unique circular chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 14464–14469.
- 3. Xu Q, Dziejman M, Mekalanos JJ (2003) Determination of the transcriptome of Vibrio cholerae during intraintestinal growth and midexponential phase in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 1286–1291.
- 4. Rosa PA, Tilly K, Stewart PE (2005) The burgeoning molecular genetics of the Lyme disease spirochaete. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 129–143.
- 5. Holden MT, Titball RW, Peacock SJ, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Atkins T, et al. (2004) Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14240–14245.
- 6. Casjens S (1998) The diverse and dynamic structure of bacterial genomes. Annu Rev Genet 32: 339–377.
- 7. Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J (2004) Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68: 403–431 table of contents.
- 8. Kono N, Arakawa K, Tomita M (2011) Comprehensive prediction of chromosome dimer resolution sites in bacterial genomes. BMC Genomics 12: 19.
- 9. Possoz C, Junier I, Espeli O (2012) Bacterial chromosome segregation. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 17: 1020–1034.
- 10. Vallet-Gely I, Boccard F (2013) Chromosomal organization and segregation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Genet 9: e1003492.
- 11. Harms A, Treuner-Lange A, Schumacher D, Sogaard-Andersen L (2013) Tracking of Chromosome and Replisome Dynamics in Myxococcus xanthus Reveals a Novel Chromosome Arrangement. PLoS Genet 9: e1003802.
- 12. Joshi MC, Bourniquel A, Fisher J, Ho BT, Magnan D, et al. (2011) Escherichia coli sister chromosome separation includes an abrupt global transition with concomitant release of late-splitting intersister snaps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 2765–2770.
- 13. Stouf M, Meile JC, Cornet F (2013) FtsK actively segregates sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 11157–11162.
- 14. Thiel A, Valens M, Vallet-Gely I, Espeli O, Boccard F (2012) Long-range chromosome organization in E. coli: a site-specific system isolates the Ter macrodomain. PLoS Genet 8: e1002672.
- 15. de Boer PA (2010) Advances in understanding E. coli cell fission. Curr Opin Microbiol 13: 730–737.
- 16. Wu LJ, Errington J (2004) Coordination of cell division and chromosome segregation by a nucleoid occlusion protein in Bacillus subtilis. Cell 117: 915–925.
- 17. Espeli O, Borne R, Dupaigne P, Thiel A, Gigant E, et al. (2012) A MatP-divisome interaction coordinates chromosome segregation with cell division in E. coli. EMBO J 31: 3198–3211.
- 18. Mercier R, Petit MA, Schbath S, Robin S, El Karoui M, et al. (2008) The MatP/matS site-specific system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell 135: 475–485.
- 19. Dubarry N, Barre FX (2010) Fully efficient chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli cells lacking the integral membrane domain of FtsK. EMBO J 29: 597–605.
- 20. Saleh OA, Perals C, Barre FX, Allemand JF (2004) Fast, DNA-sequence independent translocation by FtsK in a single-molecule experiment. EMBO J 23: 2430–2439.
- 21. Kennedy SP, Chevalier F, Barre FX (2008) Delayed activation of Xer recombination at dif by FtsK during septum assembly in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 68: 1018–1028.
- 22. Espeli O, Lee C, Marians KJ (2003) A physical and functional interaction between Escherichia coli FtsK and topoisomerase IV. J Biol Chem 278: 44639–44644.
- 23. Bigot S, Marians KJ (2010) DNA chirality-dependent stimulation of topoisomerase IV activity by the C-terminal AAA+ domain of FtsK. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3031–3040.
- 24. Lesterlin C, Pages C, Dubarry N, Dasgupta S, Cornet F (2008) Asymmetry of chromosome Replichores renders the DNA translocase activity of FtsK essential for cell division and cell shape maintenance in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 4: e1000288.
- 25. Dubarry N, Possoz C, Barre FX (2010) Multiple regions along the Escherichia coli FtsK protein are implicated in cell division. Mol Mic 78: 1088–1100.
- 26. Val M-E, Kennedy SP, El karoui M, Bonné L, Chevalier F, et al. (2008) FtsK-dependent dimer resolution on multiple chromosomes in the pathogen Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet 4: e1000201.
- 27. David A, Demarre G, Muresan L, Paly E, Barre FX, et al. (2014) The two Cis-acting sites, parS1 and oriC1, contribute to the longitudinal organisation of Vibrio cholerae chromosome I. PLoS Genet 10: e1004448.
- 28. Rasmussen T, Jensen RB, Skovgaard O (2007) The two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae are initiated at different time points in the cell cycle. Embo J 26: 3124–3131.
- 29. Yamaichi Y, Bruckner R, Ringgaard S, Moll A, Cameron DE, et al. (2012) A multidomain hub anchors the chromosome segregation and chemotactic machinery to the bacterial pole. Genes Dev 26: 2348–2360.
- 30. Yamaichi Y, Fogel MA, Waldor MK (2007) par genes and the pathology of chromosome loss in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 630–635.
- 31. Brezellec P, Hoebeke M, Hiet MS, Pasek S, Ferat JL (2006) DomainSieve: a protein domain-based screen that led to the identification of dam-associated genes with potential link to DNA maintenance. Bioinformatics 22: 1935–1941.
- 32. Srivastava P, Fekete RA, Chattoraj DK (2006) Segregation of the replication terminus of the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes. J Bacteriol 188: 1060–1070.
- 33. Lesterlin C, Gigant E, Boccard F, Espeli O (2012) Sister chromatid interactions in bacteria revealed by a site-specific recombination assay. EMBO J 31: 3468–3479.
- 34. Das B, Bischerour J, Val M-E, Barre FX (2010) Molecular keys of the tropism of integration of the cholera toxin phage. PNAS 107: 4377–4382.
- 35. Goley ED, Yeh YC, Hong SH, Fero MJ, Abeliuk E, et al. (2011) Assembly of the Caulobacter cell division machine. Mol Microbiol 80: 1680–1698.
- 36. Perals K, Capiaux H, Vincourt JB, Louarn JM, Sherratt DJ, et al. (2001) Interplay between recombination, cell division and chromosome structure during chromosome dimer resolution in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 39: 904–913.
- 37. Barre FX, Aroyo M, Colloms SD, Helfrich A, Cornet F, et al. (2000) FtsK functions in the processing of a Holliday junction intermediate during bacterial chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 14: 2976–2988.
- 38. Dupaigne P, Tonthat NK, Espeli O, Whitfill T, Boccard F, et al. (2012) Molecular basis for a protein-mediated DNA-bridging mechanism that functions in condensation of the E. coli chromosome. Mol Cell 48: 560–571.
- 39. Demarre G, Chattoraj DK (2010) DNA adenine methylation is required to replicate both Vibrio cholerae chromosomes once per cell cycle. PLoS Genet 6: e1000939.
- 40. Sliusarenko O, Heinritz J, Emonet T, Jacobs-Wagner C (2011) High-throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio-temporal dynamics. Mol Microbiol 80: 612–627.
- 41. Marvig RL, Blokesch M (2010) Natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae as a tool–optimizing the procedure. BMC Microbiol 10: 155.
- 42. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Stockum A, Nieduszynski CA, Lloyd RG (2013) Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature 500: 608–611.