• Loading metrics

Environmental Stresses Disrupt Telomere Length Homeostasis

  • Gal Hagit Romano ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Gal Hagit Romano, Yaniv Harari

    Affiliations Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Yaniv Harari ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Gal Hagit Romano, Yaniv Harari

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Tal Yehuda,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Ariel Podhorzer,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Linda Rubinstein,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Ron Shamir,

    Affiliation Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Assaf Gottlieb,

    Affiliation Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Yael Silberberg,

    Affiliations Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Dana Pe'er,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Eytan Ruppin,

    Affiliation Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Roded Sharan,

    Affiliation Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

  • Martin Kupiec

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Environmental Stresses Disrupt Telomere Length Homeostasis

  • Gal Hagit Romano, 
  • Yaniv Harari, 
  • Tal Yehuda, 
  • Ariel Podhorzer, 
  • Linda Rubinstein, 
  • Ron Shamir, 
  • Assaf Gottlieb, 
  • Yael Silberberg, 
  • Dana Pe'er, 
  • Eytan Ruppin


Telomeres protect the chromosome ends from degradation and play crucial roles in cellular aging and disease. Recent studies have additionally found a correlation between psychological stress, telomere length, and health outcome in humans. However, studies have not yet explored the causal relationship between stress and telomere length, or the molecular mechanisms underlying that relationship. Using yeast as a model organism, we show that stresses may have very different outcomes: alcohol and acetic acid elongate telomeres, whereas caffeine and high temperatures shorten telomeres. Additional treatments, such as oxidative stress, show no effect. By combining genome-wide expression measurements with a systematic genetic screen, we identify the Rap1/Rif1 pathway as the central mediator of the telomeric response to environmental signals. These results demonstrate that telomere length can be manipulated, and that a carefully regulated homeostasis may become markedly deregulated in opposing directions in response to different environmental cues.

Author Summary

Over 70 years ago, Barbara McClintock described telomeres and hypothesized about their role in protecting the integrity of chromosomes. Since then, scientists have shown that telomere length is highly regulated and associated with cell senescence and longevity, as well as with age-related disorders and cancer. Here, we show that despite their importance, the tight, highly complex regulation of telomeres may be disrupted by environmental cues, leading to changes in telomere length. We have introduced yeast cells to 13 different environmental stresses to show that some stresses directly alter telomere length. Our results indicate that alcohol and acetic acid elongate telomeres, while caffeine and high temperatures shorten telomeres. Using expression data, bioinformatics tools, and a large genetic screen, we explored the mechanisms responsible for the alterations of telomere length under several stress conditions. We identify Rap1 and Rif1, central players in telomere length maintenance, as the central proteins directly affected by external cues that respond by altering telomere length. Because many human diseases are related to alterations in telomere length that fuel the disease's pathology, controlling telomere length by manipulating simple stressing agents may point the way to effective treatment, and will supply scientists with an additional tool to study the machinery responsible for telomere length homeostasis.


Telomeres are nucleoprotein structures located at the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres are essential for chromosome replication and stability [1], and protect chromosome ends from degradation and deleterious chromosomal rearrangements [1], [2]. In human embryonic cells, telomeres are elongated by the enzyme telomerase [3]. In somatic cells, however, telomerase expression is low, and telomeres shorten with each cell division due to the incomplete replication of the linear chromosome ends by conventional DNA polymerases. This progressive telomere shortening constitutes a “molecular clock” that underlies cellular aging [4]. Accordingly, telomere length is associated with cell senescence and longevity [5], as well as with age-related disorders and cancer [6]. While short telomeres have been reported to predict early mortality [7], recent work has shown that telomerase reactivation may reverse tissue degeneration in aged telomerase-deficient mice [8].

Three systematic genome-wide surveys in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [9][11] have revealed that mutations in at least 6% of the genes lead to alterations of telomere length. These TLM (Telomere Length Maintenance) genes span a broad range of functional categories and different cellular compartments. Integration of data from these large-scale mutant screens with information about protein–protein interactions has further permitted charting of the cellular sub-network underlying telomere length regulation in yeast [12], [13], revealing a complex set of interactions responsible for a very tight length homeostasis.

Environmental stresses affect the regulation and the activity of many genes and accordingly may perturb telomere length homeostasis by altering the expression or activity of genes in the TLM network described above. Previous studies have suggested that emotional stress in humans is associated with telomere shortening, presumably through its effect on oxidative stress [14], [15]. These studies, however, establish a correlation, but not causality. Here, we use controlled experimental approaches to explore a possible effect of the environment on yeast telomere length, and to identify the molecular mechanisms by which external signals exert their effect.

Results and Discussion

Environmental signals can affect telomere length

We exposed yeast cells (S. cerevisiae) to thirteen different environmental signals for 100–400 generations (Figure 1 and Table S1). Our results show that some stresses, such as high temperature, the addition of caffeine, and low levels of hydroxyurea resulted in telomere shortening, while others, such as added acetic acid and alcohols including ethanol, methanol, and isopropanol, caused a significant increase in telomere length (Figure 1). Strikingly, under alcohol stress telomeres were not only longer, but also exhibited length heterogeneity, indicating that the mechanism responsible for telomere length homeostasis, which preferentially elongates short, but not long telomeres [16], was disrupted (Figures 1, 2). The effect of alcohols on telomere length was independent of the ability of these cells to metabolize the alcohol: Upon ethanol treatment, isogenic petite yeast strains (lacking mitochondrial function, and thus unable to utilize ethanol) exhibited elongated telomeres (Figure S1).

Figure 1. The effect of environmental stress on telomere length.

Strain BY4741 was grown for 100 generations on YEPD at optimal conditions and under mild stress conditions. DNA was extracted after 50 and 100 generations, digested with XhoI, and analyzed by Southern blot. The membrane was probed with a telomere sequence and with unique genomic sequences used as markers (779 bp and 2044 bp) to enable telomere length measurements. Telomere length was measured for at least three independent colonies. A. The difference (in bp) between telomere length grown under stress and that of cells grown on YEPD is represented by dark green bars (after 50 generations) and by light green bars (after 100 generations). B. Southern blots analyses after 100 generations showing the effect of various stresses on telomere length.

Figure 2. Kinetics of telomere length change after exposure to environmental stresses.

Wild-type yeast strain BY4741 was grown in the presence of various stresses and then released. A. YEPD containing 5% ethanol (released to YEPD after 300 generations). B. YEPD+8 mM caffeine (released to YEPD after 90 generations). C. YEPD at 37°C (released back to 30°C after 100 generations).

Importantly, however, many other environmental stresses, including oxidative stress, did not significantly alter telomere length (Figure 1 and Table S1), indicating that telomere length homeostasis is robust under many other environmental conditions. The effect of each stress on telomere length was concentration-dependent. In all cases, removal of the stressing agent resulted in a gradual restoration of wild type telomere length (Figure 2A–C), demonstrating that the changes in telomere length were physiological rather than genetic, and thus may have been mediated by altered gene expression and protein activity.

Telomere length alteration under stress is not recombination-dependent

Under unperturbed conditions, telomere length can be modified either by disrupting the regulation of telomerase/telomere-associated nucleases or by recombination. To distinguish between these two mechanisms, we analyzed the response to stresses of cells unable to carry out homologous recombination due to a deletion of the RAD52 gene. rad52 cells responded to the stresses much as would a wild type strain, indicating that telomere length alteration in response to these stresses is not recombination-dependent (Figure S2) and that the external signals affect telomerase or telomere-associated nucleases.

Exploring the mechanisms in which stress affect telomere length

To understand how external signals affect telomere length and to identify the mechanism behind this telomeric response to stress, we measured genome-wide transcript levels in yeast cells grown for 20 generations in the presence of stresses that showed an effect on telomere length (ethanol, caffeine or high temperature), as well as in the presence of H2O2, a stress that does not alter telomere length. The results were compared to genome-wide transcript levels of the same strain grown under standard conditions (YEPD medium, 30°C). Using Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) [17] with a false discovery rate (FDR) below 0.01, we obtained a set of 1,744, 1,404, 1,670 and 1,019 differentially expressed genes for caffeine, 37°C, ethanol and H2O2, respectively. General environmental stress responding (ESR) genes were not induced under these conditions, as expression level was measured after a long-term exposure to the stresses while ESR genes are induced for a short time period [18]. To identify the mechanisms responsible for telomere elongation and shortening, we sought genes that were differentially expressed only under shortening or only under elongating conditions (Figure S3). We integrated transcript abundance data with the known TLM network [13] that uses protein-protein interactions data, connecting TLM genes to the telomere maintenance machinery. The (unweighted) pairwise distances between stress-specific differentially expressed TLM genes were compared with pairwise distances of other TLM genes. This revealed that stress-specific, differentially expressed TLM genes lie significantly closer to each other for ethanol, caffeine and 37°C (p<2E-33,p<3E-27 and p<3E-50, respectively), but not for hydrogen peroxide stress, which does not affect telomere length (Materials and Methods). This phenomenon was unique to TLM genes under stresses that affect telomere length, suggesting that the differentially expressed TLM genes may be involved in transducing the external signals and disrupting telomere length homeostasis.

Based on the analysis above, we generated a list of candidate genes for further analysis. Using strains from the yeast deletion library [19] and the DAmP library of hypomorphic mutants [20] we screened mutants in this list to identify genes important for telomere length maintenance under stress conditions. Strikingly, we found a strong correlation between the rate of change in telomere length and the initial length of the mutant: in ethanol, long tlm mutants elongate more rapidly than the wild type, while short tlm mutants elongate more slowly (Pearson correlation, r = 0.61, p<E-12, Figure 3A). Similarly, in caffeine and at 37°C long tlm mutants shorten more rapidly, while short tlm mutants shorten more slowly than does the wild type (Pearson correlation, r = −0.78, p<2E-22 and r = −0.96, p<9E-34, respectively; Figure 3B–C). This correlation between abnormal telomere length and response magnitude to the stresses suggests that telomere elongation/shortening in the presence of external cues is carried out by the same basic mechanisms that maintain telomere length under unperturbed conditions.

Figure 3. Different stresses affect telomere length via different genes.

The effect of ethanol, caffeine and high temperature on telomere length was tested on strains carrying individual gene deletions/hypomorphic mutations. Each mutant was grown under the relevant stress for 100 generations and its telomere length was measured using Southern blot analysis. A–C. The X-axis shows the initial length of each mutant and the Y-axis shows the elongation or shortening after 100 generations. Each strain analyzed is represented by a circle (wt in green). A strong correlation (demarked by a red line; ±5% SD) was seen between the initial length and the effect of the stress. A. Ethanol. B. Caffeine. C. 37°C. D. Each bar represents the ratio between the initial telomere length and the elongation after 100 generations in ethanol. Very short tlm mutants (below 200 nt long) could be clearly separated into two groups: mutants of the Tel1 pathway (tel1Δ, mre11Δ, rad50Δ, xrs2Δ) were highly responsive to ethanol stress, while mutants of the NMD (nam7Δ, upf3Δ, nmd2Δ) and Ku (yku70Δ, yku80Δ) pathways show little telomeric elongation under ethanol stress.

Telomere length alteration under stress is Rif1, but not Rif2 dependent

To identify the genes that mediate the telomeric response to stress and to understand how external signals are transduced to altering telomere length, we focused on mutants that disrupt this transduction and, therefore, show an atypical response to each stress (Figure 3). A remarkable such tlm mutant is rif1Δ, which exhibited a reduced response to ethanol and caffeine but normal response to 37°C (Figures 3A and 4), indicating that elongation by ethanol and shortening by caffeine are Rif1-dependent, while telomere shortening by high temperature relies on a different mechanism.

Figure 4. Telomere elongation of different mutants grown in the presence of ethanol.

A. The level of Rap1 protein is reduced upon exposure to ethanol in wt, rif1Δ and rif2Δ mutants, but not in a strain in which the RAP1 gene is under the Tet promoter. B. The initial telomere length and the elongation after 100 generations in ethanol were measured by Southern blot. A deletion of RIF1 (two independent cultures) inhibits the response to ethanol while deletion of RIF2 (two independent cultures) increases it. A rap1-17 strain, unable to bind Rif1 or Rif2, behaves similarly to the double mutant rif1Δ rif2Δ. Expressing Rap1 under the tetracycline promoter (which is not affected by ethanol) prevents the telomeric elongation under ethanol stress. C. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis for the recruitment levels of Rif1 and Rif2 proteins to telomeres, in the absence and in the presence of ethanol. The non-telomeric ARO1 locus was used to normalize the relative levels.

The Rif1 and Rif2 proteins are negative regulators of telomerase that interact with the C-terminus of Rap1, an essential protein that binds to the telomeric repeats [21]. Under normal growth conditions, short telomeres are preferentially elongated by a mechanism that depends on Rap1. Mutations in the carboxy-terminus of RAP1 or down-regulation of the RAP1 gene lead to extreme telomere elongation and to an increase in telomere length variability, similar to what we observed in the presence of ethanol ([22], [23]; Figure 2). Our transcript measurements detected a reduction in the level of Rap1 expression in cells grown in the presence of ethanol [(Table S2); and [24]]. These results suggest a model in which telomere elongation under ethanol stress is primarily due to reduced levels of Rap1, which reduce Rif1 recruitment to telomeres. To test this hypothesis, we used a strain in which RAP1 was expressed from a Tetracycline-inducible promoter [25]. In this strain the level of Rap1 remained unchanged in the presence of ethanol (Figure 4A) and only a slight telomere elongation was observed (Figure 4B). Also consistent with the model, a rap1-17 strain (deleted for the C terminus of Rap1), a rif1Δ single mutant and a rif1Δ rif2Δ double mutant exhibited attenuated responses to ethanol (Figure 4B). Thus, the telomere elongation response to ethanol was abolished when a steady level of Rap1 protein was maintained or when Rif1 activity was eliminated, indicating that the Rap1- Rif1 pathway is central to telomere elongation in response to ethanol. Consistent with this hypothesis, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments showed that upon exposure to ethanol there is a two-fold reduction in the level of Rif1 at telomeres, as well as a slighter reduction in the level of Rif2 (Figure 4C). Since it is necessary for both elongation and shortening responses, Rif1 may play a general sensing/structural/regulatory role, rather than a catalytic one, in the telomeric response to environmental signals. This is consistent with recent studies that found a role for Rif1 in the regulation of chromatin structure and of DNA replication origin firing [26], [27].

Remarkably, rif2Δ cells exhibited a strong response to ethanol (Figure 3A), underscoring the different roles of Rif1 and Rif2 in telomere length maintenance [28][32]. We suggest that exposure to ethanol reduces the recruitment of the Rif proteins at the telomere ends, resulting in conditions permissive for indiscriminate telomerase recruitment, elongating both short and long telomeres, and yielding a broad distribution of telomere lengths (Figure 2A). The insensitivity of rif1Δ mutants to ethanol could be due to the importance of Rif1p for the telomere elongation response, and/or the increased binding of Rif2 to telomeres in the absence of Rif1. In agreement with this model, deletion of RIF2 caused over-extension of telomeres in ethanol (Figure 3A); a reduction of Rif1 telomere recruitment by ethanol in the strain deleted for RIF2 mimics a rif1Δ rif2Δ double mutant, which exhibits increased levels of telomere elongation. In contrast to these results, the RIF2 deletion had no effect on the reduction in telomere length upon exposure to caffeine or 37°C (Figure 3B,C).

The Tel1 and NMD pathways have separate roles in telomere elongation under ethanol stress

Mutations in the TEL1 gene, which encodes the yeast ortholog of the mammalian ATM protein kinase, result in very short telomeres. Tel1 regulates the preferential elongation of short telomeres [33] by a pathway that also includes the MRX complex (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2; [34]). A separate regulatory branch includes the yeast Ku proteins [35]. Figure 3D shows that the tlm mutants with very short telomeres could be clearly separated into two groups: telomeres of mutants of the Tel1 pathway (tel1Δ, mre11Δ, rad50Δ, xrs2Δ) were hyper-responsive, while mutants of the NMD (nonsense mediated decay, nmd2Δ, nam7Δ and upf3Δ) and Ku pathways had only a mild response to ethanol. The fact that telomeres can be elongated by ethanol in the absence of Tel1 or of components of the MRX complex is surprising; notably, the wide size distribution observed upon exposure to ethanol (Figures 1, 2), is consistent with a mechanism independent of the one that preferentially elongates the shortest telomeres, which depends on the Tel1 pathway [16].

The NMD pathway degrades mRNAs carrying nonsense mutations. In addition, it affects the steady state level of hundreds of mRNAs, including those known to act at telomeres (e.g., Est1, Est2, and two components of the CST telomeric capping complex, Stn1 and Ten1 [36]). Mutations in the NMD machinery lead to higher mRNA levels of these proteins and to short telomeres [37]. The NMD pathway has been recently shown to affect the fitness of cdc13-1 and yku70 mutants by controlling the expression of Stn1, an essential telomere capping protein, which interacts with Cdc13 and participates in the recruitment of telomerase [38]. In nmd mutants, the response of telomeres to ethanol stress is reduced relative to wild-type strains, indicating that the NMD pathway is involved in telomere elongation during ethanol stress. We asked if upregulation of Ten1 and Stn1 is involved in this effect by overexpressing these genes in naïve cells and measuring the effect of ethanol on telomere length in these cells (Figure S4). Overexpression of Stn1 reduced the ethanol response and overexpression of both Stn1 and Ten1 completely abolished the telomere length response to ethanol. These results suggest that the level of CST activity, controlled by the NMD pathway, plays an important role in the telomere elongation response to ethanol. This is consistent with the proposed role of the CST complex in telomerase activation. Interestingly, mutations in the CST proteins are lethal when combined with a deletion of RIF1 [28][32], indicating the existence of an essential overlapping function between the two telomere regulatory components. The roles of the CST and Rif1 in transducing the ethanol signal to the telomeres will be the subject of future research.

Additional mutants affecting telomere response to ethanol

Among the additional mutants with a reduced response to ethanol were doa4Δ, snf7Δ and did4Δ (Figure 3A). DOA4 encodes an enzyme that removes ubiquitin from membrane proteins destined for vacuolar degradation. The Doa4 protein resides in the late endosome, where it interacts with the ESCRT-III machinery, which includes Did4 and Snf7 [39]. A role was previously observed for vacuolar traffic proteins in telomere length maintenance [40]; however, the precise mechanism remains enigmatic. Another mutant that shows apathy towards ethanol is hpr1Δ, defective for a component of the THO complex. Consistent with these results, mutations in HPR1 were recently shown to affect the expression levels of RIF1 [41].

In contrast to these genes, a deletion of HSP104 was hyper-responsive to ethanol. Hsp104 is a stress chaperone that plays an important role in maintaining prion particles in the cell [42]. It is unclear whether its role in telomere length regulation is related to its role in prion maintenance.

Telomere response to caffeine and high temperature

Deletion of Rif1 and mutations in Rap1 also significantly decrease the telomeric response to caffeine, indicating that Rif1-Rap1 is not only involved in telomere elongation under ethanol stress, but also in telomere shortening under caffeine. Caffeine is a known inhibitor of phosphatydyl inositol-3 kinase related kinases (PI3K-like kinases) such as human ATR and ATM [43] and their yeast counterparts, Tel1 and Mec1 [44]. Therefore, we tested whether mutations in these target genes would abolish the telomere shortening caused by caffeine. Indeed, deletion of either TEL1 or MEC1 individually does not prevent the response to caffeine, but a double mutant tel1Δ mec1Δ is completely insensitive to the telomeric effect of caffeine (Figure S5), consistent with the known redundant function that these two kinases play in telomere biology [45]. Thus, caffeine causes telomere shortening by inhibiting the ATM/ATR-like regulatory kinases.

Mutations in Rap1 and the deletion of Rif1 affect only the shortening rate in the presence of caffeine but do not affect the response to high temperature. High temperature has a broad, pleiotropic effect, and may alter telomere length via several mechanisms. Several TLM genes that, when mutated, result in short telomeres, are down regulated by high temperature (Table S3). However, no single deletion mutant failed to respond to high temperature by shortening its telomere length, suggesting that there are redundant functions among these responding genes. This result is consistent with a recent study [46] proposing that one or more telomerase components are intrinsically thermolabile.

Accurate telomere length homeostasis is dependent on a large genetic network that includes ∼400 (largely evolutionarily conserved) genes [9][11]. Our results show that this network can be disrupted by several environmental signals, and by different regulation mechanisms that lead to altered telomere length. These responses are distinct from the stereotypic responses to stress [18], and seem to be specific only to particular conditions.

Telomere length and telomerase activity are important factors in the pathobiology of human disease. Age-related diseases and premature aging syndromes, for example, are characterized by the shortening of telomeres [47]. Tumor cells, on the other hand, prevent telomere shortening and telomere loss by up-regulating telomerase, thereby perpetuating cells with short telomeres and high chromosomal instability [48]. Thus, although the mechanisms at work differ, changes in telomere length fuel disease pathology in cancer and other premature aging syndromes. While previous studies have identified correlations between telomere length and environmental conditions such as mental stress [49], socioeconomic status [50], and health-related behavior in adults [51], we extend those findings here by demonstrating direct causality between environmental cues and changes in telomere length. This identification of mechanisms by which external signals modify telomere length significantly advances our understanding of the complex interplay of genes and environment. More critically, however, these findings also point a future path to strategic manipulations of telomere length that may well have important therapeutic implications in the treatment of human disease.

Materials and Methods

Yeast strains

All the yeast strains used in this study are derivatives of BY4741 (MATa ura3Δ met15Δ leu2Δ his3Δ), unless otherwise specified. Mutants were obtained from the yeast deletion library [19] or from the DAmP library of hypomorphic alleles [20]. Strains carrying genes with tetracycline-inducible promoters were taken from the library described in [25]. Petite BY4741 derivatives were obtained by plating cells on YEPD plates containing ethidium bromide. Strains deleted for MEC1, TEL1 and SML1 were in the MS71 background [52] (kindly provided by T. Petes).

Telomere length measurement

Telomeric Southern blots were carried out as in [53]. PCR fragments containing telomeric sequences and a genomic region that hybridizes to two size marker bands (2044 and 779 bp) were used as probes. The telomere length was measured with an in-house software (TelQuant) using the size marker bands as reference. Telomere length was ∼1250 bp in wt cells [composed of the sub-telomeric region (∼900 bp) and the telomere repeats (∼350 bp)].

Exposing cells to mild environmental stresses

Stress levels were calibrated to reduce growth by 40%–60%. Cells were subjected to the various stresses by serial transfer growth: a single colony of BY4741 was grown in rich medium (YEPD), and 5 µl were used to inoculate 5 ml cultures under the various stress conditions (in triplicates). The cultures were grown ∼10 generations before being diluted (1∶1000) into fresh medium.

Extracting differentially expressed genes in each stress

We analyzed stress-induced RNA response for caffeine, temperature of 37°C, ethanol and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), using Affymetrix GeneChip Yeast Genome 2.0 arrays. Transcript levels were measured for three independent cultures grown in the presence of the stress agent, and were compared to a control set comprised of four wild-type measurements. To obtain differentially expressed genes between the stress-induced response and the control measurements, we (i) employed the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) method for normalization and summarization of the Affymetrix arrays [54]; (ii) filtered probes which had more than half of their detection calls marked as absent; and (iii) employed the Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) [17] with false discovery rate (FDR) below 0.01. Following these procedures, we obtained a set of 1,744, 1,404, 1,670 and 1,019 differentially expressed genes for caffeine, 37°C, ethanol and H2O2, respectively.

Integrating transcript abundance data with PPI network

We used the un-weighted TLM-based network described in [13], representing the most likely network connecting TLM genes to the telomere maintenance machinery. We next compared the pairwise shortest (unweighted) distances in the network between stress-specific differentially expressed TLM genes and other TLM genes, revealing that stress-specific differentially expressed TLMs for ethanol, caffeine and 37°C lie significantly closer to each other than other TLM genes (Wilcoxon ranked sum test, p<2e−33,p<3e−27 and p<3e−50 for ethanol, caffeine and 37°C stresses, respectively). Reassuringly, the hydrogen peroxide stress showed no significant difference between the two types of TLM genes. Last, using an assembled yeast protein-protein interaction network [13], we verified that stress-specific differentially expressed TLM genes are significantly closer in this network than other stress-specific differentially expressed genes (p<6e−9 for all stresses), verifying that closeness on the network is not a general property of differentially expressed genes.

Detection of over- and under-responsive genes in the presence of stress

In an attempt to identify stress-response related genes, we examined the elongation or shortening of the telomere for each knockout gene in the absence or presence of the stress. The elongation/shortening of the telomere in the presence of the stress displayed a linear relation with the initial length of the telomere (Pearson correlation coefficient between the two variables is ρ = −0.77 (p<9e−25), −0.95 (p<2e−38) and 0.36 (p<7e−6) for caffeine, 37°C and ethanol, respectively). In order to detect outliers, we performed a robust linear regression analysis. Following [55], we assumed that the residuals follow a normal distribution and identified the outlier genes as the most extreme 5% (2.5% from each side). The computations were performed using Matlab.

Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP)

Chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP) was carried out by standard methods [56]. The association of Rif1-HA, and Rif2-HA with Y′-element telomeres was detected using Santa Cruz Mouse anti HA monoclonal IgG antibodies (SC-7392). Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) reactions were carried out using the following primers: Y′-element : 5′-GGCTTGATTTGGCAAACGTT-3′, and 5′-GTGAACCGCTACCATCAGCAT-3′. ARO1: 5′-GTCGTTACAAGGTGATGCC-3′, and 5′- CGAAATAGCGGCAACAAC-3′. The relative fold enrichment\depletion of the telomere-associated proteins Rif1 and Rif2 was calculated as follows: [telIP/ARO1IP]/[tel input/ARO1input] [57].

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Ethanol causes telomere length increase in strains unable to metabolize it. Strain BY4741 and two independent petite derivatives were grown for 60 generations in the presence of 5% ethanol.



Figure S2.

The changes in telomere length caused by environmental stress are independent of homologous recombination. A rad52Δ strain shows telomere elongation in the presence of ethanol and telomere shortening in the presence of caffeine and high temperature.



Figure S3.

Venn diagram showing the number of differentially expressed genes under each of the stress conditions tested.



Figure S4.

The NMD pathway affects the response to ethanol through the Ten1 and Stn1 genes (components of the CST complex). Wild type cells carrying various plasmids were grown in the presence of 5% ethanol for the number of generations shown. Overexpression of either Stn1 or Ten1 has no effect or only a mild effect on telomeric elongation, while overexpression of both together inhibits the telomeric elongation under ethanol stress.



Figure S5.

Mec1 and Tel1 mediate caffeine stress. Wild type cells, as well as two independent colonies of strains deleted for either MEC1, TEL1 or both (all in a sml1Δ background) were grown in the presence of caffeine for 100 generations. The double mutant tel1Δ mec1Δ did not exhibit telomere shortening by caffeine.



Table S1.

The effect of environmental signals on telomere length.



Table S2.

Expression levels as measured by DNA microarray hybridization. Cells were grown in the presence of either ethanol, caffeine, H2O2 at 30°C, in YEPD at 30°C and at 37°C.



Table S3.

List of genes whose expression changed upon growth on stressing conditions. TLM genes are marked “1”, non-TLM genes “0”. Increased expression upon stress is denoted “1”, reduced expression appears as “−1”.




We thank all members of the Kupiec lab for fruitful discussions, Tom Petes for strains and Judith Berman, Julie Cooper and Dudi Tzfati for comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GHR YH MK. Performed the experiments: GHR YH TY AP LR AG. Analyzed the data: GHR AG R. Shamir R. Sharan ER YS MK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DP R. Shamir ER R. Sharan. Wrote the paper: GHR YH MK.


  1. 1. Chan SW, Blackburn EH (2002) New ways not to make ends meet: telomerase, DNA damage proteins and heterochromatin. Oncogene 21: 553–563.
  2. 2. de Lange T (2009) How telomeres solve the end-protection problem. Science 326: 948–952.
  3. 3. Collins K, Mitchell JR (2002) Telomerase in the human organism. Oncogene 21: 564–579.
  4. 4. Hayflick L (1965) The Limited in Vitro Lifetime of Human Diploid Cell Strains. Exp Cell Res 37: 614–636.
  5. 5. Lundblad V, Szostak JW (1989) A mutant with a defect in telomere elongation leads to senescence in yeast. Cell 57: 633–643.
  6. 6. Blasco MA (2005) Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 6: 611–622.
  7. 7. Bakaysa SL, Mucci LA, Slagboom PE, Boomsma DI, McClearn GE, et al. (2007) Telomere length predicts survival independent of genetic influences. Aging Cell 6: 769–774.
  8. 8. Jaskelioff M, Muller FL, Paik JH, Thomas E, Jiang S, et al. (2010) Telomerase reactivation reverses tissue degeneration in aged telomerase-deficient mice. Nature 469: 102–106.
  9. 9. Askree SH, Yehuda T, Smolikov S, Gurevich R, Hawk J, et al. (2004) A genome-wide screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants that affect telomere length. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 8658–8663.
  10. 10. Gatbonton T, Imbesi M, Nelson M, Akey JM, Ruderfer DM, et al. (2006) Telomere length as a quantitative trait: genome-wide survey and genetic mapping of telomere length-control genes in yeast. PLoS Genet 2: e35.
  11. 11. Ungar L, Yosef N, Sela Y, Sharan R, Ruppin E, et al. (2009) A genome-wide screen for essential yeast genes that affect telomere length maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 3840–3849.
  12. 12. Shachar R, Ungar L, Kupiec M, Ruppin E, Sharan R (2008) A systems-level approach to mapping the telomere length maintenance gene circuitry. Mol Syst Biol 4: 172.
  13. 13. Yosef N, Ungar L, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kupiec M, et al. (2009) Toward accurate reconstruction of functional protein networks. Mol Syst Biol 5: 248.
  14. 14. Damjanovic AK, Yang Y, Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Nguyen H, et al. (2007) Accelerated telomere erosion is associated with a declining immune function of caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients. J Immunol 179: 4249–4254.
  15. 15. Epel ES, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Wolkowitz OM, Puterman E, et al. (2010) Dynamics of telomerase activity in response to acute psychological stress. Brain, behavior, and immunity 24: 531–539.
  16. 16. Chang M, Arneric M, Lingner J (2007) Telomerase repeat addition processivity is increased at critically short telomeres in a Tel1-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 21: 2485–2494.
  17. 17. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 5116–5121.
  18. 18. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, et al. (2000) Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241–4257.
  19. 19. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, et al. (2002) Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387–391.
  20. 20. Breslow DK, Cameron DM, Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Stewart-Ornstein J, et al. (2008) A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome. Nat Methods 5: 711–718.
  21. 21. Wotton D, Shore D (1997) A novel Rap1p-interacting factor, Rif2p, cooperates with Rif1p to regulate telomere length in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 11: 748–760.
  22. 22. Kyrion G, Boakye KA, Lustig AJ (1992) C-terminal truncation of RAP1 results in the deregulation of telomere size, stability, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 12: 5159–5173.
  23. 23. Krauskopf A, Blackburn EH (1998) Rap1 protein regulates telomere turnover in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 12486–12491.
  24. 24. Stanley D, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA, Borneman A, Fraser S (2010) Transcriptional changes associated with ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 88: 231–239.
  25. 25. Davierwala AP, Haynes J, Li Z, Brost RL, Robinson MD, et al. (2005) The synthetic genetic interaction spectrum of essential genes. Nat Genet 37: 1147–1152.
  26. 26. Hayano M, Kanoh Y, Matsumoto S, Renard-Guillet C, Shirahige K, et al. (2012) Rif1 is a global regulator of timing of replication origin firing in fission yeast. Genes & development 26: 137–150.
  27. 27. Park S, Patterson EE, Cobb J, Audhya A, Gartenberg MR, et al. (2011) Palmitoylation controls the dynamics of budding-yeast heterochromatin via the telomere-binding protein Rif1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 14572–14577.
  28. 28. Martina M, Clerici M, Baldo V, Bonetti D, Lucchini G, et al. (2012) A Balance between Tel1 and Rif2 Activities Regulates Nucleolytic Processing and Elongation at Telomeres. Mol Cell Biol 32: 1604–1617.
  29. 29. McGee JS, Phillips JA, Chan A, Sabourin M, Paeschke K, et al. (2010) Reduced Rif2 and lack of Mec1 target short telomeres for elongation rather than double-strand break repair. Nature structural & molecular biology 17: 1438–1445.
  30. 30. Ribeyre C, Shore D (2012) Anticheckpoint pathways at telomeres in yeast. Nature structural & molecular biology 19: 307–313.
  31. 31. Xue Y, Rushton MD, Maringele L (2011) A novel checkpoint and RPA inhibitory pathway regulated by Rif1. PLoS Genet 7: e1002417.
  32. 32. Anbalagan S, Bonetti D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2011) Rif1 supports the function of the CST complex in yeast telomere capping. PLoS Genet 7: e1002024.
  33. 33. Arneric M, Lingner J (2007) Tel1 kinase and subtelomere-bound Tbf1 mediate preferential elongation of short telomeres by telomerase in yeast. EMBO Rep 8: 1080–1085.
  34. 34. Tsukamoto Y, Taggart AK, Zakian VA (2001) The role of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in telomerase- mediated lengthening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres. Current biology : CB 11: 1328–1335.
  35. 35. Nugent CI, Bosco G, Ross LO, Evans SK, Salinger AP, et al. (1998) Telomere maintenance is dependent on activities required for end repair of double-strand breaks. Current biology : CB 8: 657–660.
  36. 36. Grandin N, Reed SI, Charbonneau M (1997) Stn1, a new Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein, is implicated in telomere size regulation in association with Cdc13. Genes & development 11: 512–527.
  37. 37. Lew JE, Enomoto S, Berman J (1998) Telomere length regulation and telomeric chromatin require the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway. Mol Cell Biol 18: 6121–6130.
  38. 38. Addinall SG, Holstein EM, Lawless C, Yu M, Chapman K, et al. (2011) Quantitative fitness analysis shows that NMD proteins and many other protein complexes suppress or enhance distinct telomere cap defects. PLoS genetics 7: e1001362.
  39. 39. Amerik A, Sindhi N, Hochstrasser M (2006) A conserved late endosome-targeting signal required for Doa4 deubiquitylating enzyme function. The Journal of cell biology 175: 825–835.
  40. 40. Rog O, Smolikov S, Krauskopf A, Kupiec M (2005) The yeast VPS genes affect telomere length regulation. Current genetics 47: 18–28.
  41. 41. Yu TY, Wang CY, Lin JJ (2012) Depleting Components of the THO Complex Causes Increased Telomere Length by Reducing the Expression of the Telomere-Associated Protein Rif1p. PloS one 7: e33498.
  42. 42. Halfmann R, Jarosz DF, Jones SK, Chang A, Lancaster AK, et al. (2012) Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature 482: 363–368.
  43. 43. Sarkaria JN, Busby EC, Tibbetts RS, Roos P, Taya Y, et al. (1999) Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer Res 59: 4375–4382.
  44. 44. Saiardi A, Resnick AC, Snowman AM, Wendland B, Snyder SH (2005) Inositol pyrophosphates regulate cell death and telomere length through phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related protein kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 1911–1914.
  45. 45. Takata H, Kanoh Y, Gunge N, Shirahige K, Matsuura A (2004) Reciprocal association of the budding yeast ATM-related proteins Tel1 and Mec1 with telomeres in vivo. Mol Cell 14: 515–522.
  46. 46. Paschini M, Toro TB, Lubin JW, Braunstein-Ballew B, Morris DK, et al. (2012) A Naturally Thermolabile Activity Compromises Genetic Analysis of Telomere Function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191: 79–93.
  47. 47. Blasco MA (2007) Telomere length, stem cells and aging. Nature chemical biology 3: 640–649.
  48. 48. Artandi SE, DePinho RA (2010) Telomeres and telomerase in cancer. Carcinogenesis 31: 9–18.
  49. 49. Epel ES, Blackburn EH, Lin J, Dhabhar FS, Adler NE, et al. (2004) Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 17312–17315.
  50. 50. Needham BL, Fernandez JR, Lin J, Epel ES, Blackburn EH (2012) Socioeconomic status and cell aging in children. Soc Sci Med 74: 1948–51.
  51. 51. Du M, Prescott J, Kraft P, Han J, Giovannucci E, et al. (2012) Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and leukocyte telomere length in women. Am J Epidemiol 175: 414–422.
  52. 52. McCulley JL, Petes TD (2010) Chromosome rearrangements and aneuploidy in yeast strains lacking both Tel1p and Mec1p reflect deficiencies in two different mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 11465–11470.
  53. 53. Ungar L, Harari Y, Toren A, Kupiec M (2011) Tor complex 1 controls telomere length by affecting the level of Ku. Current biology : CB 21: 2115–2120.
  54. 54. Hochreiter S, Clevert DA, Obermayer K (2006) A new summarization method for Affymetrix probe level data. Bioinformatics 22: 943–949.
  55. 55. Knorr EM, Ng RT. A unified approach for mining outliers; 1997. IBM Press. pp. 11.
  56. 56. Braunstein M, Rose AB, Holmes SG, Allis CD, Broach JR (1993) Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev 7: 592–604.
  57. 57. Fisher TS, Taggart AK, Zakian VA (2004) Cell cycle-dependent regulation of yeast telomerase by Ku. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 1198–1205.