Defining the Pathways Underlying the Prolonged PR Interval in Atrioventricular Conduction Disease

  • Jerry Curran,
  • Peter J. Mohler

    Affiliation: The Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute and Departments of Internal Medicine and of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

Defining the Pathways Underlying the Prolonged PR Interval in Atrioventricular Conduction Disease

  • Jerry Curran, 
  • Peter J. Mohler
  • Published: December 6, 2012
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003154

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed arrhythmia, and it is estimated to affect more than 2 million adults annually in the United States alone [1]. The risk of stroke, heart failure, and sudden death are all increased in patients with AF. The frequency of AF increases with age and most often underlies other overt cardiomyopathies or cardiovascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or hypertension [2], [3]. However, for nearly 70 years AF has also been known to be an inherited, Mendelian disorder [4]. Indeed, work from the Framingham Heart Study reported a significant increase in the risk of AF in patients who had just one parent with AF [5]. The genetic mechanisms that lead to AF vary widely as do the degrees of penetrance [6], [7].

Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease is characterized by a prolonged PR interval in surface electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings. Importantly, a prolonged PR interval is a strong predictor of AF; and like AF, variability in the PR interval has a genetic component. However, pinpointing the genetic factors underlying AV conduction has been wrought with difficulty and remarkably little is known about the genes leading to increased susceptibility to PR interval variability. In this issue of PLOS Genetics, Lodder and colleagues provide compelling evidence that increased expression of the Tnni3k gene (which encodes Troponin I-interacting kinase 3) is significantly correlated with increased PR interval [8].

Previous findings from this research team identified a quantitative trait locus for PR interval variability on chromosome 3 within a mouse model that harbors a variant in the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel (Scn5a1798D/+) [9], [10]. In the process of engineering this experimental mouse model, the investigators noted that the ECGs of the parental strains, 129P2-Scn5a1798insD/+ and FVBN/J-Scn5a1798insD/+, both phenocopied many of the ECG characteristics of human patients harboring the homologous SCN5A-1795insD variant, namely conduction defects manifested in the PR interval. These two mouse strains displayed variation in the severity of the PR interval variation, indicating that while the root genetic cause is likely the same, the degree of penetrance diverges owing to differing haplotypes. In their new study, the team cleverly exploits this natural variation to precisely pinpoint the underlying genetic locus, Tnni3k, that is shared by the mouse strains and is responsible for PR interval variability. Importantly, the investigators perform in vivo functional studies using mice overexpressing human troponin I-interacting kinase 3 to confirm the role of this gene product in regulating PR interval in atrioventricular conduction.

Tnni3k belongs to the MAPKKK family of polypeptides [11]. Interestingly, PLOS Genetics recently published work by Wheeler et al. that identified Tnni3k as a strong modifier of disease progression in a mouse model of cardiomyopathy [12]. In this work, the evidence implied that Tnni3k actively participates only in the stress response pathways within the heart, as mice with minimal Tnni3k expression at baseline showed no cardiac abnormalities. Furthermore, and importantly, Tnni3k expression is restricted to cardiac tissue. Taken together, this evidence increases the prominence of Tnni3k as a potential therapeutic target for multiple cardiac electrical and structural pathologies.

While the genetic and in vivo findings are compelling, the new data from Lodder and colleagues raises questions regarding the exact functional role(s) that Tnni3k polypeptides play in the heart (Figure 1). In this study, phosphorylation targets of this kinase were not identified. Indeed, our current understanding of how this kinase functions is broadly lacking. As this work is focused upon AV conduction disease, the authors appropriately speculate that gap junctions and/or cardiac ion channels involved in action potential propagation may be direct targets of Tnni3k. Investigations that identify the phosphorylation targets of Tnni3k are warranted. Furthermore, a clear link to human heart disease has yet to be established: does Tnni3k modify the progression towards heart failure or regulate PR interval duration in conduction diseases as it is now known to in mice? While Tnni3k expression is expected to be cardiac-specific, its particular distribution within the heart is unknown. Establishing differential expression in the various chambers, structures (i.e., sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes), or tissues will further inform us on the functional role(s) of Tnni3k.

Figure 1. The development of a reentry circuit due to slowed action potential velocity.

Increased expression of Tnni3k (and downstream targets) slows conduction velocity of the propagating action potential. Slowed conduction, in turn, favors the formation of stable reentrant propagation, a common mechanism for sustained arrhythmia.


In summary, Lodder et al. have provided strong evidence that Tnni3k regulates PR interval variability in a mouse model of atrioventricular conduction disease. Importantly, this new work highlights the potential for original insights into gene function through creative, varied genetic and physiological approaches, leading to a more educated translation of basic science into new therapeutic targets.


  1. 1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG (1995) Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med 155: 469–473. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430050045005
  2. 2. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, et al. (2001) Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 285: 2370–2375. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370
  3. 3. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE (1995) The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study. Am J Med 98: 476–484. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80348-9
  4. 4. Wolf L (1943) Familial auricular fibrillation. N Engl J Med 229: 396–397. doi: 10.1056/nejm194309022291002
  5. 5. Fox CS, Parise H, D'Agostino RB Sr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Vasan RS, et al. (2004) Parental atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in offspring. JAMA 291: 2851–2855. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2851
  6. 6. Sinner MF, Ellinor PT, Meitinger T, Benjamin EJ, Kaab S (2011) Genome-wide association studies of atrial fibrillation: past, present, and future. Cardiovasc Res 89: 701–709. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr001
  7. 7. Darbar D, Herron KJ, Ballew JD, Jahangir A, Gersh BJ, et al. (2003) Familial atrial fibrillation is a genetically heterogeneous disorder. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 2185–2192. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00465-0
  8. 8. Lodder EM, Scicluna BP, Milano A, Sun AY, Tang H (2012) Dissection of a quantitative trait locus for PR interval duration identifies Tnni3k as a novel modulator of cardiac conduction. PLoS Genet 8: e1003113 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003113.
  9. 9. Remme CA, Scicluna BP, Verkerk AO, Amin AS, van Brunschot S, et al. (2009) Genetically determined differences in sodium current characteristics modulate conduction disease severity in mice with cardiac sodium channelopathy. Circ Res 104: 1283–1292. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.109.194423
  10. 10. Scicluna BP, Wilde AA, Bezzina CR (2008) The primary arrhythmia syndromes: same mutation, different manifestations. Are we starting to understand why? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 19: 445–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01073.x
  11. 11. Lai ZF (2009) TNNI3K could be a novel molecular target for the treatment of cardiac diseases. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 4: 203–210. doi: 10.2174/157489009789152285
  12. 12. Wheeler FC, Tang H, Marks OA, Hadnott TN, Chu PL, et al. (2009) Tnni3k modifies disease progression in murine models of cardiomyopathy. PLoS Genet 5: e1000647 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000647.