The activation of phase-specific cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) is associated with ordered cell cycle transitions. Among the mammalian Cdks, only Cdk1 is essential for somatic cell proliferation. Cdk1 can apparently substitute for Cdk2, Cdk4, and Cdk6, which are individually dispensable in mice. It is unclear if all functions of non-essential Cdks are fully redundant with Cdk1. Using a genetic approach, we show that Cdk2, the S-phase Cdk, uniquely controls the G2/M checkpoint that prevents cells with damaged DNA from initiating mitosis. CDK2-nullizygous human cells exposed to ionizing radiation failed to exclude Cdk1 from the nucleus and exhibited a marked defect in G2/M arrest that was unmasked by the disruption of P53. The DNA replication licensing protein Cdc6, which is normally stabilized by Cdk2, was physically associated with the checkpoint regulator ATR and was required for efficient ATR-Chk1-Cdc25A signaling. These findings demonstrate that Cdk2 maintains a balance of S-phase regulatory proteins and thereby coordinates subsequent p53-independent G2/M checkpoint activation.
Metazoan cells contain multiple Cdks that regulate cell cycle progression. Recent studies have shown that mouse cells can grow normally with just Cdk1. The roles of the non-essential Cdks remain a fundamental question. In this study, we describe the generation and detailed characterization of CDK2-knockout human somatic cells. Our study demonstrates that Cdk2 is required for robust DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Loss of Cdk2 caused a marked deficiency in the G2/M arrest—a basic response to DNA damage—in cells that were also nullizygous for P53. We propose that the multiple Cdks present in metazoan cells provide a mechanism by which the cell cycle can be efficiently halted after DNA damage. Significantly, this study reveals a heretofore unrecognized dependence for Cdk2 in p53-deficient cancer cells.
Citation: Chung JH, Bunz F (2010) Cdk2 Is Required for p53-Independent G2/M Checkpoint Control. PLoS Genet 6(2): e1000863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000863
Editor: Sue Biggins, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States of America
Received: September 23, 2009; Accepted: January 28, 2010; Published: February 26, 2010
Copyright: © 2010 Chung, Bunz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI), Clinical Innovator Award (www.famri.org); the National Cancer Institute (grant #CA104253); and the W. W. Smith Charitable Trust (www.wwsmithcharitabletrust.org). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Cdks associate with cyclins to form heterodimers that are sequentially activated during the cell cycle. Metazoan cells have multiple Cdks and cyclins that are temporally regulated ,. In normal cell cycles, Cdk4 and Cdk6 pair with D-type cyclins during G1, Cdk2 pairs with E- and A-type cyclins during S and G2, and Cdk1 pairs with A- and B-type cyclins during G2 and M. The importance of Cdks in cell cycle transitions was suggested by studies in which expression of dominant negative mutants or introduction of inhibitory antibodies or small molecule inhibitors caused phase-specific cell cycle arrest . However recent genetic studies have called into question the requirement for multiple Cdks –. RNAi-mediated depletion of Cdks in human cells  and gene knockouts in mice – showed that Cdk2, Cdk4 and Cdk6 are dispensable for cell cycle progression. Cdk1 can bind D-, E-, and A-type cyclins and functionally substitute for the non-essential Cdks . While it is clear that Cdk1 alone can drive unperturbed cell cycle progression, it remains unclear whether the non-essential Cdks have non-redundant functions in cell cycle responses to stress.
Cdks are targeted by checkpoints that halt the cell cycle in response to DNA damage. Cdk2 is primarily considered a downstream target of the S-phase checkpoint ,. However Cdk2 can also signal upstream via the phosphorylation of ATRIP, a binding partner of the ATR kinase . Despite this data suggesting a role for Cdk2 in the regulation of checkpoint signaling, conflicting genetic evidence challenges the functional requirement for Cdk2 in DNA damage responses. Both the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints appear to remain fully functional in CDK2−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) ,. As Cdk2 and Cdk1 are functionally redundant in supporting DNA replication, it would seem plausible that Cdk1 could similarly substitute for Cdk2 in checkpoint pathways. Such redundancy would account for the lack of apparent checkpoint defects in the mouse CDK2-knockout.
Here we show that Cdk2 uniquely activates the G2/M checkpoint and that this function is masked by the presence of p53, which functions independently to arrest cells in G2 after DNA damage. Unlike the functions of Cdk2 during unperturbed S-phase, the role of Cdk2 in the G2/M checkpoint is non-redundant and cannot be performed by Cdk1.
Stabilization of Cdc25A in Cdk2-deficient cells
Does Cdk2 contribute to human checkpoints? We first tested whether Cdk2 is required for the regulation of Cdc25A, a common target of checkpoint kinases and a critical mediator of cell cycle transitions. Depletion of Cdk2 with siRNA resulted in increased Cdc25A protein levels in human colorectal cancer cells (Figure 1A).
(A) Human colorectal cancer cells HCT116 and SW480 transfected with control (Con) or CDK2 (CDK2) siRNA. Levels of Cdc25A and Cdk2 were analyzed by immunoblot. α-tubulin was assessed as a loading control. (B) CDK2 targeting strategy. Exons 2-5 at the CDK2 locus were replaced upon integration of the knockout vector. (C) Levels of Cdc25A, Cdk2 and p53 were determined by immunoblot in parental cells and single and double knockout cells. (D) Isogenic HCT116 cells were harvested at the indicated times after cycloheximide treatment. Cdc25A protein levels were analyzed by immunoblot, quantitated, normalized to α-tubulin and represented as a percentage relative to untreated control cells. (E) Isogenic HCT116 cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258 and subjected to flow cytometry, before and 24 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Positions of cell populations with 2N and 4N DNA content are indicated.
To unambiguously evaluate the role of Cdk2 in checkpoint responses, we disrupted both CDK2 alleles in the human colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 (Figure 1B). HCT116 cells have intact DNA damage-responsive checkpoints – and detailed analysis of these cells has revealed that p53 is required for maintaining stable arrest at G1/S and at G2/M after ionizing radiation (IR) . To compare the contributions of p53 and Cdk2, we disrupted P53 and CDK2 individually to generate P53−/− and CDK2−/− cells, respectively, and together to generate double knockout cells (CDK2−/− P53−/−). Two double knockout clones were obtained in independent experiments. As expected, homozygous disruption of P53 and CDK2 led to loss of protein expression in a genotype-specific manner (Figure 1C). Consistent with the established role of Cdk2 in promoting the G1-S transition, asynchronous CDK2−/− cells exhibited an elevated G1 fraction with fewer cells in S-phase (Figure 1E). Following IR treatment, 60% of CDK2−/− cells arrested at G1/S (Figure 1E), consistent with previous observations of an intact G1/S checkpoint in CDK2−/− MEFs ,. P53 disruption caused a characteristic loss of the G1/S checkpoint, irrespective of CDK2 genotype (Figure 1E). Stabilization of p53 and the induction of its downstream target p21 after IR were not affected by CDK2 disruption (Figure S1C).
In P53+/+ and P53−/− backgrounds, Cdk2 deficiency resulted in increased Cdc25A (Figure 1C). Cdc25A protein levels are known to be tightly controlled by phosphorylation, in both stressed and unstressed cells ,. To determine if increased Cdc25A protein following loss of Cdk2 was due to changes in stability, we assessed Cdc25A turnover by treating HCT116 and CDK2−/− cells with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. While Cdc25A was degraded by 90 min in CDK2−/− cells, the rate of degradation was decreased (Figure 1D) indicating that Cdk2 contributes to normal Cdc25A protein turnover.
Cdk2 and p53 cooperatively mediate G2/M checkpoint arrest
To assess the integrity of the G2/M checkpoint response to DNA double strand breaks, we treated isogenic cultures with IR and trapped the cells that subsequently entered mitosis with the microtubule-destabilizing drug nocodazole. Cells of all genotypes arrested normally in mitosis when treated with nocodazole alone (Figure 2A). p53-deficient cells do not stably arrest at G2/M following IR , and therefore exhibited a modest increase in mitotic entry after 48–60 h, compared with wild type cells in which the mitotic index remained below 4% (Figure 2A). The extent of mitotic entry was greatly elevated in double knockout cells (CDK2−/− P53−/−; Figure 2A). Accordingly, the mitotic marker phospho-histone H3 S10 (H3S10-P) was strongly expressed in CDK2−/− P53−/− cells 48 h following IR/nocodazole treatment (Figure 2B). Unirradiated cells entered mitosis within 24 h of the addition of nocodazole (Figure 2A). The temporal delay in the mitotic entry of irradiated double knockout cells compared with unirradiated controls suggests that checkpoint pathways were activated in the absence of Cdk2 and p53, but were apparently insufficient to facilitate stable arrest. This G2/M checkpoint defect was apparent over a range of IR doses (Figure S1A) and could be detected as early as 24 h after IR/nocodazole treatment (Figure 2 and Figure S1A). In contrast, the majority of CDK2 knockout-P53 wild type cells (CDK2−/−) arrested at G1/S after IR treatment, and the remaining subpopulation (about 40%) of these cells arrested at G2/M with 4N DNA content (Figure 1E). A very small number of these 4N cells entered mitosis over the course of the experiment (Figure 2 and Figure S1A). We conclude that Cdk2 plays an important role in G2/M arrest after DNA damage and that the requirement for Cdk2 was masked by the function of p53 at both the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints.
(A,B) Entry into mitosis was assessed by incubation of untreated or irradiated (12 Gy) isogenic HCT116 cells in 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole. Two independent CDK2−/− P53−/− clones are shown. Cells were collected at the indicated times. (A) Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258. Mitotic chromosome condensation was determined by fluorescence microscopy, images were taken at 63× magnification (scale bar, 10 µm). (B) Levels of histone H3S10-P were determined by immunoblot.
Cdk2-null cells fail to sequester Cdk1 in the cytoplasm after IR
The G2-M transition is controlled in part by Cdk1 localization. In unperturbed cells, Cdk1 is cytoplasmic during interphase and enters the nucleus in prophase to trigger mitosis. After DNA damage, Cdk1 is excluded from the nucleus, thus contributing to arrest in G2 ,.
CDK2−/− MEFs have been reported to exhibit altered Cdk1 localization . In these cells, deregulated Cdk1 localization has been attributed to the redistribution of cyclin E, normally associated with Cdk2, to Cdk1 . Several studies demonstrate a similar redistribution of the nuclear protein cyclin A to Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 in both mouse and human cells ,,,, and such complexes have been shown to promote mitotic entry –.
Consistent with these previous studies, the amount of cyclin E and cyclin A associated with Cdk1 was increased in CDK2-knockout human cells (Figure 3A). As Cdk localization is dependent on its partner cyclin ,, we asked whether the changes in Cdk1-cyclin complexes observed in CDK2−/− cells might affect Cdk1 localization.
(A) Association between Cdk1 and cyclins E and A was determined by immunoprecipitation/immunoblot. Non-denatured cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-Cdk1 or control (IgG) antibodies. Samples not subjected to immunoprecipitation were analyzed as whole cell lysate. Levels of Cdk1 and cyclins B1, E, and A were determined by immunoblot. (B) Cdk1 levels in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were determined by immunoblot at the indicated times after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Loading of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins was assessed by probing levels of Orc2 and α-tubulin, respectively. (C) Localization of Cdk1 by indirect immunofluorescence. Isogenic HCT116 cells were fixed 24 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR, stained with Cdk1 antibody (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). Representative fields are shown under low (20×) and high (63×) magnification (scale bar, 50 µm under 20× magnification and 10 µm under 63× magnification). (D–F) Localization of cyclins by indirect immunofluorescence. Isogenic HCT116 cells were fixed 24 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR, stained with (D) cyclin B1, (E) cyclin E or (F) cyclin A antibodies (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). Representative fields are shown under 40× magnification (scale bar, 10 µm).
Total Cdk1 protein levels were unaffected by CDK2 genotype or IR (Figure 3A and Figure S1C). After IR treatment, the amount of Cdk1 in the nucleus was increased in CDK2−/− cells compared to wild type cells (Figure 3B). The increase in nuclear Cdk1 was independent of P53 genotype, and temporally preceded entry of double knockout cells into mitosis (Figure 3B). Together, these data suggest that aberrant nuclear Cdk1 was a cause rather than a consequence of defective G2/M checkpoint function in CDK2−/− P53−/− cells. The failure of CDK2-knockout cells to exclude Cdk1 from the nucleus in response to IR was confirmed by immunofluorescence. The localization of Cdk1 in untreated cells was similar in HCT116 and all isogenic derivatives (data not shown). By 24 h after IR, virtually all cells with wild type CDK2 had sequestered Cdk1 in the cytoplasm, while CDK2−/− cells exhibited Cdk1 staining in both the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments (Figure 3C).
To determine which cyclin partners might contribute to the altered Cdk1 localization in CDK2−/− cells, we examined the localization of cyclin B1, cyclin A and cyclin E after IR. Cyclin B1 was cytoplasmic in all cell lines (Figure 3D), suggesting that aberrant nuclear localization of Cdk1 was not caused by deregulated cyclin B1 localization. In contrast, cyclins E and A were nuclear in checkpoint-proficient P53-wild type cells (Figure 3E and 3F). Cyclin E was barely detectable in P53−/− cells after IR (Figure 3E), presumably because these cells bypass the G1/S checkpoint and progress to G2/M wherein cyclin E is not normally expressed; cyclin A, which is normally expressed from interphase until prometaphase, was located in the nucleus in these cells (Figure 3F). In agreement with studies of CDK2−/− MEFs , these findings suggest that the redistribution of cyclin E and cyclin A to Cdk1 results in its aberrant localization to the nucleus after DNA damage.
Deregulation of Cdc25A is a cause of G2/M checkpoint failure
In addition to localization, Cdk1 is also controlled by inhibitory phosphorylation. The Cdc25A phosphatase promotes mitotic entry by removing the inhibitory Y15 phosphate moiety on Cdk1 (Cdk1Y15-P) . This mode of activation is turned off following IR, when Cdc25A is degraded in a Chk1-dependent manner . Cdk1 Y15 phosphorylation is a p53-independent checkpoint mechanism .
The increased Cdc25A protein levels in untreated, Cdk2-deficient cells (Figure 1C and 1D) prompted us to examine whether Cdc25A was also aberrantly regulated in response to IR. While Cdc25A was rapidly degraded after IR in wild type cells, Cdc25A levels remained high in cells lacking Cdk2 (Figure 4A). Next, we asked whether the failure to degrade Cdc25A after IR affected the ability of CDK2-knockout cells to induce Cdk1Y15-P and arrest at G2/M. As expected, p53-deficient cells normally induced Cdk1Y15-P after IR (Figure 4B); in contrast, the levels of Cdk1Y15-P did not increase after IR in cells that were also Cdk2-deficient. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of Cdk1 Y15 was increased in untreated Cdk2-deficient cells compared to untreated cells with wild type Cdk2 (Figure 4B). This increase in basal Cdk1Y15-P could be a consequence of the redistribution of Cdk1 to alternative Cdk1-cyclin heterodimers and the consequent expansion of the role of Cdk1 to multiple phases of the cell cycle, in Cdk2-deficient cells (Figure 3A) ,,,. It is unknown if non-canonical Cdk1-cyclin heterodimers are efficient substrates for activating phosphatases and inhibitory kinases.
(A) Isogenic HCT116 cells were harvested at the indicated times after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Cdc25A levels were determined by immunoblot. (B) Non-denatured cell lysates were collected before and 24 h after 12 Gy IR. Cdk1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) and analyzed for phosphorylation on Y15 by immunoblot. Cdk1Y15-P was quantitated and normalized to total Cdk1. (C) Stable knockdown of Cdc25A in CDK2−/− P53−/− cells by retrovirus-mediated delivery of empty vector control (vector) or CDC25A shRNA (shCDC25A), assessed by immunoblot. (D) Cdc25A knockdown or control CDK2−/− P53−/− cells were treated with 12 Gy IR and 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole. Histone H3S10-P levels were determined by immunoblot. (E) Mitotic indices of Cdc25A-knockdown and control CDK2−/− P53−/− cells at the indicated times after treatment with 12 Gy IR and 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole. Error bars represent s.e.m. from six knockdown clones.
To assess the relevance of increased Cdc25A protein levels to the observed checkpoint defect, we tested whether stable depletion of Cdc25A could restore checkpoint function. Depletion of Cdc25A in CDK2−/− P53−/− cells using short hairpin RNAs (Figure 4C) suppressed histone H3S10-P induction (Figure 4D) and mitotic chromosome condensation (Figure 4E) after IR/nocodazole treatment. Mitotic entry of unirradiated cells was not affected by Cdc25A knockdown (Figure S1B). These results show that elevated Cdc25A contributes significantly to the checkpoint defect.
Cdk2 facilitates ATR-Chk1-Cdc25A pathway activation in part by stabilizing Cdc6
Cdc25A protein stability is regulated by two pathways in response to IR. ATM phosphorylates the checkpoint kinase Chk2 , which then triggers Cdc25A degradation . Cdc25A is also targeted for IR-dependent degradation by Chk1 , which is activated after phosphorylation by ATR on residues S317 and S345 ,. The ATR-Chk1 signaling pathway is active at a reduced physiological level during unperturbed cell growth, and regulates basal Cdc25A protein turnover during S-phase .
IR-induced phosphorylation of Chk1 S317 and S345 was reduced in CDK2-knockout cells, irrespective of P53 genotype (Figure 5). Levels of IR-induced Chk1 S345 and S317 phosphorylation (Chk1S345-P and Chk1S317-P) were stably high in wild type cells but increased over time in p53-deficient cells. This effect is likely due to the entry of G1/S checkpoint-defective P53−/− cells into S-phase (Figure 1C), when ATR activity is known to increase . RNAi-mediated knockdown of Cdk2 in a diverse panel of human cell lines consistently reduced IR-dependent Chk1 phosphorylation (Figure S2A). In contrast, Chk2 phosphorylation by ATM and the formation of DNA damage foci containing phosphorylated ATM were unaffected by CDK2 genotype (Figure S1C and S1D). These observations suggest that Cdk2 is required for efficient ATR- but not ATM-mediated checkpoint signaling.
Isogenic cells were treated with 12 Gy IR and harvested at the indicated time points. Levels of the Chk1 phosphoproteins, Chk1S345-P and Chk1S317-P, Chk1 and Cdc6 were determined by immunoblot. Levels of α-tubulin were assessed as a loading control.
To determine how Cdk2 might control ATR signaling, we first examined the status of ATR localization and known interacting proteins. The ability of ATR to localize to DNA damage foci was unaffected by disruption of CDK2 (Figure S2C), as was the interaction between ATR and ATRIP, the requisite ATR binding partner  (Figure S2D). ATRIP is phosphorylated on residue S224 by Cdk2  and this phosphorylation event has been shown to contribute to G2/M checkpoint arrest. We observed that cells lacking Cdk2 exhibited somewhat reduced ATRIP S224 phosphorylation (Figure S2B). Given the modest deficiency in ATRIP phosphorylation, we investigated additional mediators that might also contribute to checkpoint signaling by Cdk2.
One compelling candidate is the Cdk2 substrate Cdc6. Cdc6 is a loading factor for the DNA replicative helicase complex required for replication origin licensing . In addition to its role in DNA replication, Cdc6 has also been implicated as a regulator of checkpoint function and mitotic entry –. In human cells, depletion of Cdc6 causes cells with actively replicating DNA to aberrantly enter mitosis , while overexpression of Cdc6 causes Chk1 phosphorylation and G2/M arrest . Cdc6 has also been implicated in ATR-Chk1 signaling in fission yeast and Xenopus .
Inherently unstable, Cdc6 can be stabilized as a direct result of phosphorylation by Cdk2 . Although Cdc6 is an essential DNA replication protein, cells lacking functional Cdk2 are able to progress through S-phase despite significantly reduced Cdc6 levels ,. Therefore the relatively small amount of Cdc6 remaining in Cdk2-deficient cells is clearly sufficient to support DNA replication and cell cycle progression. In concordance with previous studies, Cdc6 protein levels were decreased (Figure 5 and Figure S3A), and turnover was increased (Figure 6A), in Cdk2-deficient cells. In checkpoint-deficient P53−/− cells, Cdc6 levels increased after IR in tandem with Chk1 phosphoprotein (Figure 5). These results are consistent with a potential role for Cdc6 in the regulation of the upstream kinase of Chk1, ATR.
(A) Cdc6 protein stability was analyzed by immunoblot in wild-type and CDK2−/− cells at the indicated times after cycloheximide treatment. Cdc6 levels were quantitated, normalized to α-tubulin, and represented as a percentage relative to untreated control cells. (B) Physical interaction between endogenous Cdc6 and ATR. Non-denatured cell lysates from the indicated cell lines were collected before or 4 h after 12 Gy IR. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti–ATR or isotypic control (IgG) antibodies. Samples not subjected to immunoprecipitation were analyzed as whole cell lysate. Levels of ATR and Cdc6 were determined by immunoblot. (C) Isogenic HCT116 cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-tagged Cdc6 (HA-Cdc6). Transfected cells were untreated or treated with 12 Gy IR and lysed after 4 h. Non-denatured cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti–HA, anti–ATR, or isotypic control (IgG) antibodies. Samples not subjected to immunoprecipitation were analyzed as whole cell lysate. Levels of ATR and HA-Cdc6 were determined by immunoblot. (D–F) U2OS cells were transfected with control (Con) or CDC6 (CDC6) siRNA. (D) Lysates were taken before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Chk1 and Cdc6 levels were analyzed by immunoblot. Relative Chk1-phosphorylation (Chk1-P/Chk1) was determined by quantitation of Chk1S317-P plus Chk1S345-P followed by normalization to total Chk1. (E) Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258 and subjected to flow cytometry before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. (F) Cells fixed and stained for histone H3S10-P before and 24 h after treatment with 4 Gy IR and 1 µg/ml nocodazole, mitotic index was determined by indirect immunofluorescence. Error bars represent s.e.m. from three independent experiments. (G–I) CDK2−/− P53−/− cells were transfected with an empty vector or Cdc6 expression vector. (G) Lysates were taken before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Chk1 and Cdc6 levels were analyzed by immunoblot. (H) Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258 and subjected to flow cytometry before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. (I) Cells fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258 before and 24 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR and 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole, mitotic index was determined by fluorescence microscopy. Error bars represent s.e.m. from six independent experiments.
In fission yeast, a direct interaction between the Cdc6 homologue Cdc18 and the ATR homologue Rad3 is induced in response to replication stress; this complex then activates checkpoint signaling . ATR and Cdc6 also interact following replication stress in human cells . We asked whether Cdc6 and ATR might similarly interact after IR. Complexes of endogenous ATR and Cdc6 were detected after IR in HCT116 cells (Figure 6B). To confirm this interaction we exogenously expressed HA-tagged Cdc6 (HA-Cdc6; ) in HCT116 and CDK2-knockout cells and probed for an interaction with ATR (Figure 6C). Exogenous expression of HA-Cdc6 was higher in wild type cells (Figure 6C), which mirrored the relative abundance of endogenous Cdc6 and further illustrated the stabilizing effect of Cdk2 (Figure 6B and Figure S3A). ATR co-precipitated with HA-Cdc6, and the amount of ATR bound increased after IR treatment (Figure 6C, Figure S3C and S3D). In the reciprocal experiment, ATR was able to pull down increased HA-Cdc6 after IR treatment in both HCT116 and U2OS cell lines (Figure 6C and Figure S3B). The coimmunoprecipitation of Cdc6 and ATR was not disrupted by 50 µg/ml ethidium bromide, suggesting that this interaction is specific and not simply mediated by DNA (data not shown).
We could not reliably detect ATR-Cdc6 complexes in CDK2−/− cells, before or after IR (Figure 6B and 6C). As Cdc6 stability and protein levels were markedly decreased in CDK2-knockout cells (Figure 6A–6C and Figure S3A), we asked whether the lack of detectable interaction was simply due to reduced Cdc6 protein levels or, alternatively, if loss of Cdk2-dependent phosphorylation on Cdc6 directly disrupted its interaction with ATR. Mutant Cdc6 proteins, wherein the Cdk2-phosphorylated serine residues (S54, S74, S106) were replaced either with non-phosphorylatable alanine residues (HA-Cdc6AAA) or with phosphomimetic aspartic acid residues (HA-Cdc6DDD; ), were expressed and pulled down. ATR co-precipitated with HA-Cdc6AAA in wild type HCT116 cells and with HA-Cdc6DDD in CDK2−/− cells (Figure S3C and S3D). These results indicate that the ATR-Cdc6 interaction is independent of Cdc6 phosphorylation by Cdk2 per se, and that the differences in complex formation observed were most likely the result of decreased Cdc6 levels caused by Cdk2 deficiency.
To examine whether Cdk2-mediated stabilization of Cdc6 could functionally contribute to ATR-Chk1 signaling, we experimentally manipulated Cdc6 levels. First, we knocked down Cdc6 by siRNA. Cdc6 protein levels could be transiently lowered in U2OS cells, which express wild type p53, by siRNA transfection (Figure 6D).
The effects of Cdc6 levels on cell growth have been intensively studied. Depending on the extent and timing of Cdc6 depletion and the type of target cell, Cdc6 knockdown has been shown to result in variable changes to cell cycle distribution as well as cell death , –. In many cases, transient depletion of Cdc6 in various cell types, including HCT116 ,,, has been reported to have minimal effects. Normal cells and cancer cells have been observed to respond differently to Cdc6 knockdown ,, but the genetic alterations in cancer cells that might underlie such differences have not been conclusively identified. We observed that changes to the cell cycle distribution 48 h after partial Cdc6 knockdown were minimal, with a similar proportion of cells in S-phase and a small decrease of cells in G1 (Figure 6E). Knockdown of Cdc6 caused a reduction in IR-induced Chk1 phosphorylation (Figure 6D) that was reminiscent of the observed changes in checkpoint signaling after CDK2 knockdown (Figure S2A) or knockout (Figure 5). While knockdown of Cdc6 was less efficient in HCT116 cells, decreased Cdc6 also led to reduced IR-induced Chk1 phosphorylation, irrespective of P53 genotype (Figure S3E). Knockdown of Cdc6 also led to increased levels of the Chk1 target Cdc25A, before and after IR treatment (Figure S3F and S3G). To determine if Cdc6 protein levels could functionally impact G2/M checkpoint arrest, we assessed mitotic index after CDC6 knockdown followed by sequential treatment with IR and nocodazole. Twenty-four hours after IR/nocodazole treatment, cells pretreated with CDC6 siRNA entered mitosis in higher numbers as compared with control siRNA (Figure 6F).
We next increased Cdc6 levels by transient transfection of an untagged Cdc6 expression construct. While partial restoration of Cdc6 expression in CDK2−/− P53−/− knockout cells did not appreciably alter the cell cycle profile (Figure 6H), it did result in increased IR-induced Chk1 phosphorylation (Figure 6G) and reduced mitotic entry after IR/nocodazole treatment (Figure 6I). Together, the results of these overexpression and knockdown experiments suggest that stabilization of Cdc6 by Cdk2 contributes to efficient IR-induced Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR and p53-independent G2/M checkpoint function. The Cdk2-Cdc6 pathway appears to have a direct affect on ATR-Chk1 signaling, as cell cycle profiles were only minimally changed by Cdc6 manipulation under these conditions (Figure 6E and 6H).
Studies of knockout mice have now unequivocally shown that the essential S-phase functions previously attributed to Cdk2 can also be conducted by Cdk1 in somatic cells –. These seminal observations raised the question of why mammalian cells express multiple Cdks that appear to be non-essential. In this report, we demonstrate that loss of Cdk2 alters the regulation of several proteins that are known to regulate S-phase progression, but also control mitotic entry, including Cdc25A, Chk1, Cdc6 and ATRIP ,,. The altered balance of these bifunctional proteins did not affect the transition of CDK2−/− cells through the phases of the unperturbed cell cycle, but did compromise their ability to mount effective checkpoint signaling through the ATR-Chk1 pathway. Cdk2 and Cdk1 are therefore redundant with respect to essential cell cycle functions, but have distinct, non-redundant roles in a key DNA damage response. IR-induced ATR activation is restricted to the S- and G2-phases , when Cdk2 is normally active. We show that Cdk2 plays a unique role in facilitating robust DNA damage checkpoint control by the ATR-Chk1-Cdc25A pathway. Cdk2 appears to promote the formation of active ATR complexes in at least two ways: via the phosphorylation of ATRIP and by the stabilization of Cdc6 (Figure 7). It is possible that Cdk2 also controls checkpoint signaling through additional mechanisms such as the recently described Cdk2 interacting protein (CINP) which facilitates robust ATR signaling .
Cdk2 directly phosphorylates at least two proteins, ATRIP and Cdc6, that directly regulate the G2-M transition via the ATR-Chk1-Cdc25A pathway. The activity of Cdk1 is independently inhibited upon activation of the p53-p21 pathway, which is defective in many cancer cells. See text for additional details.
At present the precise mechanism by which Cdc6 affects ATR signaling remains unclear. Our data suggest that Cdk2-mediated phosphorylation of Cdc6 merely regulates Cdc6 levels but is not otherwise required for ATR-Cdc6 complex formation (Figure S3C). In agreement with our results, a paper published during the preparation of this manuscript has reported an interaction between ATR and Cdc6 in human and Xenopus cells  and showed that the non-phosphorylatable Cdc6-AAA mutant could interact with ATR, albeit with somewhat lower efficiency. The fission yeast Cdc6 homologue Cdc18 is required to anchor the ATR homologue Rad3 to chromatin , but our results suggest that Cdc6 may not perform an analogous function in human cells (Figure S2B). Further study is required to determine if Cdc6 might directly affect ATR catalytic activity, or if Cdc6 might promote the assembly of higher order complexes required for full ATR activation.
In conjunction with checkpoint pathways that target Cdk1 via Cdc25 phosphatases, the exclusion of Cdk1 from the nucleus is an important G2/M checkpoint mechanism . In mouse  and human (Figure 3B and 3C) cells lacking Cdk2, Cdk1 becomes aberrantly localized to the nucleus. It would therefore appear that the formation of non-canonical Cdk1-cyclin heterodimers that allow Cdk1 to compensate for Cdk2 in the completion of S phase in unperturbed cells ,, also impairs the ability of damaged cells to arrest at G2/M. We propose that the temporal division of respective S-phase and G2-phase functions between Cdk2 and Cdk1 is a critical feature of the metazoan cell cycle that allows its progress to be efficiently halted after DNA damage.
Defective checkpoints are a feature of the majority of human cancers –. In many cancers, checkpoint deficiencies are caused by loss-of-function mutations in P53. The genetic interaction between P53 and CDK2 described here demonstrates a novel, non-redundant requirement for Cdk2 in the p53-independent G2/M checkpoint pathways that remain intact in cancer cells.
Materials and Methods
Endogenous CDK2 and P53 loci were disrupted in HCT116 cells using recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV)-based gene targeting methods ,. Briefly, the targeting constructs pAAV-CDK2 and pSEPT-p53  were packaged into infectious rAAV subsequently used to generate transgenic clones. Identification and expansion of homologous recombinant cell lines was performed as described . At least two independent clones were isolated and analyzed for each cell line.
Cell culture, siRNA, and cell cycle analysis
HCT116, SW480 and derivatives were cultured in McCoys 5A supplemented with 6% FCS. U2OS cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS. CDK2 and CDC6 siRNA pools and non-targeting control pools were purchased from Dharmacon. Transfections were performed with 100 nM siRNA and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). In HCT116, optimal Cdk2 knockdown was achieved by two transfections 48 h apart and cells were analyzed 96 h after initial transfection. In SW480, optimal Cdk2 knockdown was achieved by a single transfection and cells were analyzed after 72 h. Cdc6 knockdown was achieved by a single transfection and cells were analyzed after 48 h. IR and nocodazole treatment were performed as described . For cell cycle analysis cells were fixed, stained with Hoechst 33258 and analyzed by flow cytometry or microscopy for mitotic chromosome condensation as described . Mitotic index for U2OS cells were determined by immunofluorescence for histone H3S10-P staining.
Total cell lysates were prepared using NuPAGE sample buffer (Invitrogen). Non-denatured cell lysates for immunoprecipitation were collected in Cell Lysis Buffer (Cell Signaling). Immunoprecipitations were performed by incubation of lysates with antibody and Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose beads (Santa Cruz) overnight at 4°C. Beads were washed, resuspended and boiled in NuPAGE lysis buffer. Proteins were separated on NuPAGE gels (Invitrogen), transferred to PVDF membranes, probed with antibodies and developed using Enhanced Chemiluminescence (Amersham). Primary antibodies were directed against α-tubulin, ATR, Cdc6, Cdk1, Cdk2, Chk1, cyclin A, cyclin E, cyclin B1, HA, p53 (Santa Cruz), Cdc25A (Neomarkers), ATMS1981-P, Cdk1Y15-P, Chk1S317-P, Chk1S345-P, Chk2T68-P (Cell Signaling), ATRIP, histone H3S10-P (Millipore), Orc2 (BD Biosciences), and ATRIPS224-P (a gift from D Cortez), as indicated. The Quantity One 4.6.1 software package (Bio-Rad) was used for quantitation. For analysis of protein stability, cells were incubated in 100 µg/ml cycloheximide prior to lysis; band intensities were measured and normalized to α-tubulin abundance. Protein levels were expressed as a percentage of untreated control cells.
Cell fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy
Subcellular fractionation was performed as described . For immunofluorescence, cells were grown on chamber slides and fixed with 3.75% paraformaldehyde/2% sucrose. Fixed cells were permeabilized in 0.2–0.5% Triton X-100 and blocked in BSA. Immunofluorescence staining was performed using Cdk1, cyclin A, cyclin B1, cyclin E or histone H3S10-P antibodies followed by biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz) and Alexa-488 conjugated avidin (Molecular Probes). Cells were counterstained with 4′-6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted with Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech). Images were captured at room temperature using an AxioImager Z1 microscope equipped with an AxioCam HRm camera, Axiovision 4.6.3 software, and a Plan Neofluar 20x/0.25NA, 40x/1.3NA or 63x/1.25NA lens (Zeiss), as indicated. Images were processed for brightness and contrast using Adobe Photoshop.
Retroviral gene transfer
CDC25A shRNA was cloned from pSUPER-Cdc25A  into the retroviral plasmid pBabe to generate pBabe-shCDC25A. Retroviral production using Amphopack293 cells (Clontech) and subsequent gene transfer was performed according to protocols supplied by the manufacturer.
Plasmids encoding HA-Cdc6, HA-Cdc6AAA and HA-Cdc6DDD were previously described . To generate the untagged full length Cdc6 construct, human Cdc6 cDNA was cloned into pCDNA3.1/Hygro (Invitrogen). Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and analyzed after 24–48 h.
Checkpoint signaling in HCT116 cells and isogenic derivatives in response to ionizing radiation. (A) Isogenic HCT116 cells were treated with 5 Gy, 8 Gy, or 12 Gy IR followed by 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole. Cells were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33258. Mitotic index was assessed by counting condensed chromosomes. Error bars represent s.e.m. from three independent experiments. (B) CDK2−/− P53−/− clones stably expressing Cdc25A shRNA from Figure 4E were treated with 0.2 µg/ml nocodazole. Mitotic index was assessed at the indicated times. Error bars represent s.e.m. from six clones. (C) Isogenic cells were harvested after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Levels of Chk2T68-P, Cdk1, p53, p21 and α-tubulin were determined by immunoblot. (D) HCT116 and CDK2−/− cells were fixed with 3.75% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X-100. Fixed cells were stained using anti-ATMS1981-P antibody and counterstained with DAPI. Cells were fixed before and 3 h after treatment with 10 Gy IR. Images were captured at 63× magnification (scale bar, 10 µm).
(1.01 MB TIF)
Effects of Cdk2 deficiency on the ATR-Chk1 pathway. (A) Levels of the indicated proteins were determined by immunoblot in human U2OS osteosarcoma cells, MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma cells, H1299 lung adenocarcinoma cells, and SW480 colorectal adenocarcinoma cells before and after treatment with 12 Gy IR. U2OS and MCF7 lysates were collected 0.5 h after IR. H1299 and SW480 lysates were collected 2 h after IR. Cells transfected with siRNA directed against CDK2 (CDK2) were compared with cells transfected with control siRNAs (Con). (B) Levels of ATRIPS224-P in untreated isogenic HCT116 cells were determined by immunoblot, quantitated and normalized to α-tubulin. (C) HCT116 and CDK2−/− cells were simultaneously fixed and permeabilized with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% Triton-X-100. Fixed cells were stained using anti–ATR antibody and counterstained with DAPI. Cells were fixed before and 20 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Images were captured at 63× magnification (scale bar, 10 µm). (D) Non-denatured cell lysates from the indicated cell lines were collected before or 4 h after 12 Gy IR. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-ATR or control (IgG) antibodies. Samples not subjected to immunoprecipitation were analyzed as whole cell lysate. Levels of ATR and ATRIP were determined by immunoblot.
(0.58 MB TIF)
Interaction of Cdc6 with ATR and modulation of Chk1-Cdc25A signaling. (A) Levels of Cdc6 were determined by immunoblot in the indicated isogenic cell lines. (B–D) Non-denatured cell lysates were collected before or 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. Lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti–ATR, anti–HA, or IgG isotype control antibodies. Lysates not subjected to immunoprecipitation were analyzed as Whole Cell Lysate. Levels of ATR and HA-Cdc6 in were determined by immunoblot. Lysates for immunoprecipitation were collected from (B) U2OS cells transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-Cdc6, (C) HCT116 transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-Cdc6 or HA-tagged non-phosphorylatable Cdc6 (HA-Cdc6-AAA), and (D) HCT116 and CDK2−/− transfected with a plasmid expressing HA-Cdc6 or HA-tagged phosphomimetic Cdc6 (HA-Cdc6-DDD). (E) Chk1 levels were determined by immunoblot in isogenic HCT116 cells transfected with control (Con) or CDC6 (CDC6) siRNA. Lysates were taken before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR. (F) Cdc25A levels were determined by immunoblot in U2OS or isogenic HCT116 cells transfected with control or CDC6 siRNA. (G) Cdc25A levels were determined by immunoblot in U2OS cells transfected with control or CDC6 siRNA before and 4 h after treatment with 12 Gy IR.
(0.47 MB TIF)
The authors thank Jiri Bartek, Bruce Clurman, David Cortez, John Diffley, Anindya Dutta, Thanos Halazonetis, and Rene Medema for providing reagents and the staff of the Kimmel Cancer Center Core Imaging Facility for technical assistance. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Leslie Meszler.
Conceived and designed the experiments: JHC FB. Performed the experiments: JHC. Analyzed the data: JHC FB. Wrote the paper: JHC FB.
- 1. Malumbres M, Barbacid M (2005) Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem Sci 30(11): 630–641.M. MalumbresM. Barbacid2005Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases.Trends Biochem Sci30(11)630641
- 2. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM (2004) Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev 18(22): 2699–2711.CJ SherrJM Roberts2004Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases.Genes Dev18(22)26992711
- 3. Hochegger H, Takeda S, Hunt T (2008) Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: Does one fit all? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(11): 910–916.H. HocheggerS. TakedaT. Hunt2008Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: Does one fit all?Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol9(11)910916
- 4. Malumbres M, Barbacid M (2009) Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: A changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer 9(3): 153–166.M. MalumbresM. Barbacid2009Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: A changing paradigm.Nat Rev Cancer9(3)153166
- 5. Berthet C, Kaldis P (2007) Cell-specific responses to loss of cyclin-dependent kinases. Oncogene 26(31): 4469–4477.C. BerthetP. Kaldis2007Cell-specific responses to loss of cyclin-dependent kinases.Oncogene26(31)44694477
- 6. Tetsu O, McCormick F (2003) Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition. Cancer Cell 3(3): 233–245.O. TetsuF. McCormick2003Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition.Cancer Cell3(3)233245
- 7. Berthet C, Aleem E, Coppola V, Tessarollo L, Kaldis P (2003) Cdk2 knockout mice are viable. Curr Biol 13(20): 1775–1785.C. BerthetE. AleemV. CoppolaL. TessarolloP. Kaldis2003Cdk2 knockout mice are viable.Curr Biol13(20)17751785
- 8. Berthet C, Klarmann KD, Hilton MB, Suh HC, Keller JR, et al. (2006) Combined loss of Cdk2 and Cdk4 results in embryonic lethality and rb hypophosphorylation. Dev Cell 10(5): 563–573.C. BerthetKD KlarmannMB HiltonHC SuhJR Keller2006Combined loss of Cdk2 and Cdk4 results in embryonic lethality and rb hypophosphorylation.Dev Cell10(5)563573
- 9. Ortega S, Prieto I, Odajima J, Martin A, Dubus P, et al. (2003) Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Nat Genet 35(1): 25–31.S. OrtegaI. PrietoJ. OdajimaA. MartinP. Dubus2003Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 is essential for meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice.Nat Genet35(1)2531
- 10. Malumbres M, Sotillo R, Santamaria D, Galan J, Cerezo A, et al. (2004) Mammalian cells cycle without the D-type cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6. Cell 118(4): 493–504.M. MalumbresR. SotilloD. SantamariaJ. GalanA. Cerezo2004Mammalian cells cycle without the D-type cyclin-dependent kinases Cdk4 and Cdk6.Cell118(4)493504
- 11. Santamaria D, Barriere C, Cerqueira A, Hunt S, Tardy C, et al. (2007) Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature 448(7155): 811–815.D. SantamariaC. BarriereA. CerqueiraS. HuntC. Tardy2007Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle.Nature448(7155)811815
- 12. Falck J, Mailand N, Syljuasen RG, Bartek J, Lukas J (2001) The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 410(6830): 842–847.J. FalckN. MailandRG SyljuasenJ. BartekJ. Lukas2001The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis.Nature410(6830)842847
- 13. Falck J, Petrini JH, Williams BR, Lukas J, Bartek J (2002) The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways. Nat Genet 30(3): 290–294.J. FalckJH PetriniBR WilliamsJ. LukasJ. Bartek2002The DNA damage-dependent intra-S phase checkpoint is regulated by parallel pathways.Nat Genet30(3)290294
- 14. Myers JS, Zhao R, Xu X, Ham AJ, Cortez D (2007) Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 dependent phosphorylation of ATRIP regulates the G2-M checkpoint response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 67(14): 6685–6690.JS MyersR. ZhaoX. XuAJ HamD. Cortez2007Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 dependent phosphorylation of ATRIP regulates the G2-M checkpoint response to DNA damage.Cancer Res67(14)66856690
- 15. Satyanarayana A, Hilton MB, Kaldis P (2008) p21 inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 19(1): 65–77.A. SatyanarayanaMB HiltonP. Kaldis2008p21 inhibits Cdk1 in the absence of Cdk2 to maintain the G1/S phase DNA damage checkpoint.Mol Biol Cell19(1)6577
- 16. Martin A, Odajima J, Hunt SL, Dubus P, Ortega S, et al. (2005) Cdk2 is dispensable for cell cycle inhibition and tumor suppression mediated by p27(Kip1) and p21(Cip1). Cancer Cell 7(6): 591–598.A. MartinJ. OdajimaSL HuntP. DubusS. Ortega2005Cdk2 is dispensable for cell cycle inhibition and tumor suppression mediated by p27(Kip1) and p21(Cip1).Cancer Cell7(6)591598
- 17. Bunz F, Dutriaux A, Lengauer C, Waldman T, Zhou S, et al. (1998) Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science 282(5393): 1497–1501.F. BunzA. DutriauxC. LengauerT. WaldmanS. Zhou1998Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage.Science282(5393)14971501
- 18. Waldman T, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1995) p21 is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 55(22): 5187–5190.T. WaldmanKW KinzlerB. Vogelstein1995p21 is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells.Cancer Res55(22)51875190
- 19. Hurley PJ, Wilsker D, Bunz F (2007) Human cancer cells require ATR for cell cycle progression following exposure to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 26(18): 2535–2542.PJ HurleyD. WilskerF. Bunz2007Human cancer cells require ATR for cell cycle progression following exposure to ionizing radiation.Oncogene26(18)25352542
- 20. Mailand N, Falck J, Lukas C, Syljuasen RG, Welcker M, et al. (2000) Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science 288(5470): 1425–1429.N. MailandJ. FalckC. LukasRG SyljuasenM. Welcker2000Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage.Science288(5470)14251429
- 21. Sorensen CS, Syljuasen RG, Falck J, Schroeder T, Ronnstrand L, et al. (2003) Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3(3): 247–258.CS SorensenRG SyljuasenJ. FalckT. SchroederL. Ronnstrand2003Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A.Cancer Cell3(3)247258
- 22. Chan TA, Hermeking H, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1999) 14-3-3Sigma is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage. Nature 401(6753): 616–620.TA ChanH. HermekingC. LengauerKW KinzlerB. Vogelstein199914-3-3Sigma is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage.Nature401(6753)616620
- 23. Pines J (1999) Four-dimensional control of the cell cycle. Nat Cell Biol 1(3): E73–9.J. Pines1999Four-dimensional control of the cell cycle.Nat Cell Biol1(3)E739
- 24. Aleem E, Kiyokawa H, Kaldis P (2005) Cdc2-cyclin E complexes regulate the G1/S phase transition. Nat Cell Biol 7(8): 831–836.E. AleemH. KiyokawaP. Kaldis2005Cdc2-cyclin E complexes regulate the G1/S phase transition.Nat Cell Biol7(8)831836
- 25. L'Italien L, Tanudji M, Russell L, Schebye XM (2006) Unmasking the redundancy between Cdk1 and Cdk2 at G2 phase in human cancer cell lines. Cell Cycle 5(9): 984–993.L. L'ItalienM. TanudjiL. RussellXM Schebye2006Unmasking the redundancy between Cdk1 and Cdk2 at G2 phase in human cancer cell lines.Cell Cycle5(9)984993
- 26. Fung TK, Ma HT, Poon RY (2007) Specialized roles of the two mitotic cyclins in somatic cells: Cyclin A as an activator of M phase-promoting factor. Mol Biol Cell 18(5): 1861–1873.TK FungHT MaRY Poon2007Specialized roles of the two mitotic cyclins in somatic cells: Cyclin A as an activator of M phase-promoting factor.Mol Biol Cell18(5)18611873
- 27. Gong D, Pomerening JR, Myers JW, Gustavsson C, Jones JT, et al. (2007) Cyclin A2 regulates nuclear-envelope breakdown and the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1. Curr Biol 17(1): 85–91.D. GongJR PomereningJW MyersC. GustavssonJT Jones2007Cyclin A2 regulates nuclear-envelope breakdown and the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1.Curr Biol17(1)8591
- 28. Mitra J, Enders GH (2004) Cyclin A/Cdk2 complexes regulate activation of Cdk1 and Cdc25 phosphatases in human cells. Oncogene 23(19): 3361–3367.J. MitraGH Enders2004Cyclin A/Cdk2 complexes regulate activation of Cdk1 and Cdc25 phosphatases in human cells.Oncogene23(19)33613367
- 29. De Boer L, Oakes V, Beamish H, Giles N, Stevens F, et al. (2008) Cyclin A/cdk2 coordinates centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events. Oncogene 27(31): 4261–4268.L. De BoerV. OakesH. BeamishN. GilesF. Stevens2008Cyclin A/cdk2 coordinates centrosomal and nuclear mitotic events.Oncogene27(31)42614268
- 30. Furuno N, den Elzen N, Pines J (1999) Human cyclin A is required for mitosis until mid prophase. J Cell Biol 147(2): 295–306.N. FurunoN. den ElzenJ. Pines1999Human cyclin A is required for mitosis until mid prophase.J Cell Biol147(2)295306
- 31. Moore JD, Yang J, Truant R, Kornbluth S (1999) Nuclear import of Cdk/cyclin complexes: Identification of distinct mechanisms for import of Cdk2/cyclin E and Cdc2/cyclin B1. J Cell Biol 144(2): 213–224.JD MooreJ. YangR. TruantS. Kornbluth1999Nuclear import of Cdk/cyclin complexes: Identification of distinct mechanisms for import of Cdk2/cyclin E and Cdc2/cyclin B1.J Cell Biol144(2)213224
- 32. Yang J, Kornbluth S (1999) All aboard the cyclin train: Subcellular trafficking of cyclins and their CDK partners. Trends Cell Biol 9(6): 207–210.J. YangS. Kornbluth1999All aboard the cyclin train: Subcellular trafficking of cyclins and their CDK partners.Trends Cell Biol9(6)207210
- 33. Donzelli M, Draetta GF (2003) Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation. EMBO Rep 4(7): 671–677.M. DonzelliGF Draetta2003Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation.EMBO Rep4(7)671677
- 34. Matsuoka S, Rotman G, Ogawa A, Shiloh Y, Tamai K, et al. (2000) Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(19): 10389–10394.S. MatsuokaG. RotmanA. OgawaY. ShilohK. Tamai2000Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A97(19)1038910394
- 35. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, et al. (2000) Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev 14(12): 1448–1459.Q. LiuS. GuntukuXS CuiS. MatsuokaD. Cortez2000Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.Genes Dev14(12)14481459
- 36. Zhao H, Piwnica-Worms H (2001) ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1. Mol Cell Biol 21(13): 4129–4139.H. ZhaoH. Piwnica-Worms2001ATR-mediated checkpoint pathways regulate phosphorylation and activation of human Chk1.Mol Cell Biol21(13)41294139
- 37. Jazayeri A, Falck J, Lukas C, Bartek J, Smith GC, et al. (2006) ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8(1): 37–45.A. JazayeriJ. FalckC. LukasJ. BartekGC Smith2006ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks.Nat Cell Biol8(1)3745
- 38. Cortez D, Guntuku S, Qin J, Elledge SJ (2001) ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling. Science 294(5547): 1713–1716.D. CortezS. GuntukuJ. QinSJ Elledge2001ATR and ATRIP: Partners in checkpoint signaling.Science294(5547)17131716
- 39. Borlado LR, Mendez J (2008) CDC6: From DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis. Carcinogenesis 29(2): 237–243.LR BorladoJ. Mendez2008CDC6: From DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis.Carcinogenesis29(2)237243
- 40. Clay-Farrace L, Pelizon C, Santamaria D, Pines J, Laskey RA (2003) Human replication protein Cdc6 prevents mitosis through a checkpoint mechanism that implicates Chk1. EMBO J 22(3): 704–712.L. Clay-FarraceC. PelizonD. SantamariaJ. PinesRA Laskey2003Human replication protein Cdc6 prevents mitosis through a checkpoint mechanism that implicates Chk1.EMBO J22(3)704712
- 41. Hermand D, Nurse P (2007) Cdc18 enforces long-term maintenance of the S phase checkpoint by anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 complex to chromatin. Mol Cell 26(4): 553–563.D. HermandP. Nurse2007Cdc18 enforces long-term maintenance of the S phase checkpoint by anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 complex to chromatin.Mol Cell26(4)553563
- 42. Lau E, Zhu C, Abraham RT, Jiang W (2006) The functional role of Cdc6 in S-G2/M in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep 7(4): 425–430.E. LauC. ZhuRT AbrahamW. Jiang2006The functional role of Cdc6 in S-G2/M in mammalian cells.EMBO Rep7(4)425430
- 43. Liu L, Choi JH, Yim H, Choi JS, Park BD, et al. (2009) ATR (AT mutated Rad3 related) activity stabilizes Cdc6 and delays G2/M-phase entry during hydroxyurea-induced S-phase arrest of HeLa cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(6): 1410–1420.L. LiuJH ChoiH. YimJS ChoiBD Park2009ATR (AT mutated Rad3 related) activity stabilizes Cdc6 and delays G2/M-phase entry during hydroxyurea-induced S-phase arrest of HeLa cells.Int J Biochem Cell Biol41(6)14101420
- 44. Oehlmann M, Score AJ, Blow JJ (2004) The role of Cdc6 in ensuring complete genome licensing and S phase checkpoint activation. J Cell Biol 165(2): 181–190.M. OehlmannAJ ScoreJJ Blow2004The role of Cdc6 in ensuring complete genome licensing and S phase checkpoint activation.J Cell Biol165(2)181190
- 45. Mailand N, Diffley JF (2005) CDKs promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting Cdc6 from APC/C-dependent proteolysis. Cell 122(6): 915–926.N. MailandJF Diffley2005CDKs promote DNA replication origin licensing in human cells by protecting Cdc6 from APC/C-dependent proteolysis.Cell122(6)915926
- 46. Melixetian M, Ballabeni A, Masiero L, Gasparini P, Zamponi R, et al. (2004) Loss of geminin induces rereplication in the presence of functional p53. J Cell Biol 165(4): 473–482.M. MelixetianA. BallabeniL. MasieroP. GaspariniR. Zamponi2004Loss of geminin induces rereplication in the presence of functional p53.J Cell Biol165(4)473482
- 47. Kan Q, Jinno S, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto H, Okayama H (2008) Cdc6 determines utilization of p21(WAF1/CIP1)-dependent damage checkpoint in S phase cells. J Biol Chem 283(26): 17864–17872.Q. KanS. JinnoK. KobayashiH. YamamotoH. Okayama2008Cdc6 determines utilization of p21(WAF1/CIP1)-dependent damage checkpoint in S phase cells.J Biol Chem283(26)1786417872
- 48. Kan Q, Jinno S, Yamamoto H, Kobayashi K, Okayama H (2008) ATP-dependent activation of p21WAF1/CIP1-associated Cdk2 by Cdc6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(12): 4757–4762.Q. KanS. JinnoH. YamamotoK. KobayashiH. Okayama2008ATP-dependent activation of p21WAF1/CIP1-associated Cdk2 by Cdc6.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A105(12)47574762
- 49. Lau E, Chiang GG, Abraham RT, Jiang W (2009) Divergent S phase checkpoint activation arising from prereplicative complex deficiency controls cell survival. Mol Biol Cell 20(17): 3953–3964.E. LauGG ChiangRT AbrahamW. Jiang2009Divergent S phase checkpoint activation arising from prereplicative complex deficiency controls cell survival.Mol Biol Cell20(17)39533964
- 50. Nevis KR, Cordeiro-Stone M, Cook JG (2009) Origin licensing and p53 status regulate Cdk2 activity during G(1). Cell Cycle 8(12): 1952–1963.KR NevisM. Cordeiro-StoneJG Cook2009Origin licensing and p53 status regulate Cdk2 activity during G(1).Cell Cycle8(12)19521963
- 51. Yoshida K, Sugimoto N, Iwahori S, Yugawa T, Narisawa-Saito M, et al. (2010) CDC6 interaction with ATR regulates activation of a replication checkpoint in higher eukaryotic cells. J Cell Sci 123(Pt 2): 225–235.K. YoshidaN. SugimotoS. IwahoriT. YugawaM. Narisawa-Saito2010CDC6 interaction with ATR regulates activation of a replication checkpoint in higher eukaryotic cells.J Cell Sci123(Pt 2)225235
- 52. Feng D, Tu Z, Wu W, Liang C (2003) Inhibiting the expression of DNA replication-initiation proteins induces apoptosis in human cancer cells. Cancer Res 63(21): 7356–7364.D. FengZ. TuW. WuC. Liang2003Inhibiting the expression of DNA replication-initiation proteins induces apoptosis in human cancer cells.Cancer Res63(21)73567364
- 53. Cimprich KA, Cortez D (2008) ATR: An essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(8): 616–627.KA CimprichD. Cortez2008ATR: An essential regulator of genome integrity.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol9(8)616627
- 54. Lovejoy CA, Xu X, Bansbach CE, Glick GG, Zhao R, et al. (2009) Functional genomic screens identify CINP as a genome maintenance protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(46): 19304–19309.CA LovejoyX. XuCE BansbachGG GlickR. Zhao2009Functional genomic screens identify CINP as a genome maintenance protein.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A106(46)1930419309
- 55. Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J (2008) An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319(5868): 1352–1355.TD HalazonetisVG GorgoulisJ. Bartek2008An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development.Science319(5868)13521355
- 56. Harper JW, Elledge SJ (2007) The DNA damage response: Ten years after. Mol Cell 28(5): 739–745.JW HarperSJ Elledge2007The DNA damage response: Ten years after.Mol Cell28(5)739745
- 57. Kastan MB, Bartek J (2004) Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432(7015): 316–323.MB KastanJ. Bartek2004Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.Nature432(7015)316323
- 58. Topaloglu O, Hurley PJ, Yildirim O, Civin CI, Bunz F (2005) Improved methods for the generation of human gene knockout and knockin cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res 33(18): e158.O. TopalogluPJ HurleyO. YildirimCI CivinF. Bunz2005Improved methods for the generation of human gene knockout and knockin cell lines.Nucleic Acids Res33(18)e158
- 59. Rago C, Vogelstein B, Bunz F (2007) Genetic knockouts and knockins in human somatic cells. Nat Protoc 2(11): 2734–2746.C. RagoB. VogelsteinF. Bunz2007Genetic knockouts and knockins in human somatic cells.Nat Protoc2(11)27342746
- 60. Smits VA, Reaper PM, Jackson SP (2006) Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response. Curr Biol 16(2): 150–159.VA SmitsPM ReaperSP Jackson2006Rapid PIKK-dependent release of Chk1 from chromatin promotes the DNA-damage checkpoint response.Curr Biol16(2)150159
- 61. van Vugt MA, Bras A, Medema RH (2004) Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 15(5): 799–811.MA van VugtA. BrasRH Medema2004Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells.Mol Cell15(5)799811