######################################## # Program: needle # Rundate: Thu Mar 27 06:24:01 2008 # Align_format: srspair # Report_file: /ebi/extserv/old-work/needle-20080327-06235995386532.output ######################################## #======================================= # # Aligned_sequences: 2 # 1: s.cerevisiae # 2: s.paradoxus # Matrix: EDNAFULL # Gap_penalty: 10.0 # Extend_penalty: 0.5 # # Length: 311 # Identity: 171/311 (55.0%) # Similarity: 171/311 (55.0%) # Gaps: 100/311 (32.2%) # Score: 442.5 # # #======================================= s.cerevisiae 1 aacgatccccgtccaagt-tatgagcttaatc--ttc 34 || |||| |.|.||| |||| ||. s.paradoxus 1 atttttgtttgcaaa------------aagtctcttagc--aatcaattg 36 s.cerevisiae 35 cataaaaatatttgaaagcaatagatcatgtactaaactaaaatcaggga 84 | ||||.|.| |||.|||..|.||..||||||| |||| s.paradoxus 37 c-----aatagtcg-aagtaatgaaccagatactaaa--aaaa------- 71 s.cerevisiae 85 aattaagactccttttgaagtaat-----acctat---tac------tta 120 ||||| ||.||| |.|||| ||| ||| s.paradoxus 72 ------------ttttg-aggaatgaggaagctatctataccagaaatta 108 s.cerevisiae 121 ctaata----cgtttgagaataagcgcaggt----actcct---ggtttt 159 .||| |.|||.||||.|| || |..||| |||||| s.paradoxus 109 --tatagcaccatttaagaagaa------gtttaaaagccttggggtttt 150 s.cerevisiae 160 tgttaaaactacaaatttatacttagcattacgaagattctcgattcc-g 208 .|||||.|..|.||||||||.|||||.||||||.|||.|||.| |||| | s.paradoxus 151 cgttaatataaaaaatttatgcttagtattacggagaatcttg-ttcctg 199 s.cerevisiae 209 aaaaacaaaaa-----ttttatcgtcatatacaaatct-agaaattacca 252 |||||.||||| .||||..|||||||.|||||.| |.||||||..| s.paradoxus 200 aaaaaaaaaaaggaatatttagtgtcatatgcaaatataaaaaattatta 249 s.cerevisiae 253 g-agctatcca 262 | |||.|.||| s.paradoxus 250 gaagccagcca 260 #--------------------------------------- #--------------------------------------- Figure S2. S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus lack of sequence conservation between HMR-E Abf1 binding site and HMR. Pairwise global alignment (Needleman–Wunsch) of DNA sequence between the HMR-E Abf1 binding site and the HMR edge, comparing S. cerevisiae to S. paradoxus. Length of the intervening sequence between HMR-E and HMR was identical in both species, but sequence conservation itself was poor.