Advertisement

< Back to Article

Statistical Methods for Detecting Differentially Abundant Features in Clinical Metagenomic Samples

Table 1

Comparison of false positives found by different methodologies. Using real metagenomic data, we simulated features with no differential abundance by randomly dividing subjects from a single population into two subpopulations.

Table 1

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352.t001