• Loading metrics

TURAN and EVAN Mediate Pollen Tube Reception in Arabidopsis Synergids through Protein Glycosylation

  • Heike Lindner,

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

  • Sharon A. Kessler ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sharon A. Kessler, Lena M. Müller

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

    Current address: Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK 73019, USA

  • Lena M. Müller ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sharon A. Kessler, Lena M. Müller

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

  • Hiroko Shimosato-Asano,

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

    Current address: Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630–0192, Japan

  • Aurélien Boisson-Dernier,

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

    Current address: Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, D-50674 Cologne, Germany

  • Ueli Grossniklaus

    Affiliation: Institute of Plant Biology & Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland

TURAN and EVAN Mediate Pollen Tube Reception in Arabidopsis Synergids through Protein Glycosylation

  • Heike Lindner, 
  • Sharon A. Kessler, 
  • Lena M. Müller, 
  • Hiroko Shimosato-Asano, 
  • Aurélien Boisson-Dernier, 
  • Ueli Grossniklaus


Pollen tube (PT) reception in flowering plants describes the crosstalk between the male and female gametophytes upon PT arrival at the synergid cells of the ovule. It leads to PT growth arrest, rupture, and sperm cell release, and is thus essential to ensure double fertilization. Here, we describe TURAN (TUN) and EVAN (EVN), two novel members of the PT reception pathway that is mediated by the FERONIA (FER) receptor-like kinase (RLK). Like fer, mutations in these two genes lead to PT overgrowth inside the female gametophyte (FG) without PT rupture. Mapping by next-generation sequencing, cytological analysis of reporter genes, and biochemical assays of glycoproteins in RNAi knockdown mutants revealed both genes to be involved in protein N-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). TUN encodes a uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein and EVN a dolichol kinase. In addition to their common role during PT reception in the synergids, both genes have distinct functions in the pollen: whereas EVN is essential for pollen development, TUN is required for PT growth and integrity by affecting the stability of the pollen-specific FER homologs ANXUR1 (ANX1) and ANX2. ANX1- and ANX2-YFP reporters are not expressed in tun pollen grains, but ANX1-YFP is degraded via the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway, likely underlying the anx1/2-like premature PT rupture phenotype of tun mutants. Thus, as in animal sperm–egg interactions, protein glycosylation is essential for the interaction between the female and male gametophytes during PT reception to ensure fertilization and successful reproduction.

Author Summary

In flowering plants, gametes are produced by the haploid, multicellular male (pollen), and female (embryo sac) gametophytes, which develop within the reproductive organs of the flower. Successful fertilization depends on delivery of the sperm cells to the embryo sac, which is embedded in the ovule, by the pollen tube. Upon arrival of the pollen tube at the opening of the ovule, crosstalk between male and female gametophytes, known as pollen tube reception, ensues; the pollen tube slows or stops its growth, then resumes rapid growth, and finally bursts to release the sperm cells and effect double fertilization. Although several members of the pollen tube reception pathway, including the receptor-like kinase FERONIA, have been identified, the molecular mechanisms underlying this communication process remain unclear. Here, we show that protein N-glycosylation is required for normal pollen tube reception. A mutant screen identified two genes, TURAN and EVAN, which are involved in protein N-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Both genes act in the FERONIA-mediated pollen tube reception pathway, which is impaired in these mutants. Thus, in plants, a “dual recognition system,” involving interactions between both protein and glycosyl residues on the surface of male and female gametophytes, appears to be required for successful pollen tube reception, conceptually similar to sperm–egg interactions in mammals, for which N-glycosylation of cell surface proteins also plays an important role.


In flowering plants, male and female gametes are constituents of the male (pollen) and female gametophytes (FG, embryo sac). A complex series of communication events between the male gametophyte and the female tissues of the flower is required for the pollen tube (PT) to deliver the two immotile sperm cells to the FG [1]. During double fertilization, one sperm cell each fuses with the egg cell and central cell to give rise to the embryo and endosperm, respectively. To reach the ovule-embedded FG, the PT grows through the stigma, the style, and the transmitting tract, enters the ovary, and grows along the funiculus towards the ovule. Gradients of various small, organic molecules [2,3], as well as larger peptides produced by the synergids [4], play an essential role in directing the PT to the FG. The synergids flank the egg cell at the micropylar end of the FG and secrete LUREs, small defensin-like proteins (DEFLs), which form a subgroup of cysteine-rich polypeptides (CRPs) [46]. Transduction of these female signals in the PT involves two receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases, LOST IN POLLEN TUBE GUIDANCE1 (LIP1) and LIP2 [7]. After arrival of the PT at the micropyle, it grows beyond the filiform apparatus (FA), a membrane-rich structure at the micropylar pole of the synergids, enters the receptive synergid, and ruptures to release the sperm cells [8]. Therefore, interactions between the PT and the synergids might consist of two spatially and temporally distinct stages. The first being PT reception at the FA, where PT growth is temporally slowed down or arrested, and the second involving rapid growth towards the PT entry site, PT rupture, and release of the two sperm cells with the concomitant death of the receptive synergid [9].

FERONIA (FER), a receptor-like kinase (RLK) of the Catharanthus roseus receptor-like kinase 1-like (CrRLK1L) subfamily [10,11], is localized to the FA [12]. In mutants lacking FER activity, synergid development is normal, but fer (or sirène [13], which is allelic) mutant FGs remain unfertilized, even by wild-type PTs. The fer mutant thus revealed that an active signaling process is required for PT reception [10,12,13]. In these unfertilized ovules, the PT enters the receptive synergid but neither stops its growth nor ruptures to release the sperm cells. Instead, PT growth continues inside the FG leading to a PT overgrowth phenotype [10,12,13]. The two closest homologs of FER are the pollen-specific genes ANXUR1 (ANX1) and ANX2 [14,15]. anx1 and anx2 single mutants have no phenotype, but anx1/2 double mutant PTs burst in vitro and in vivo shortly after germination [14,15]. Signaling via ANX proteins activates NADPH oxidases that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16]. They fine-tune the Ca2+-gradient at the PT tip, resulting in the sustained secretion of membrane and cell wall material required for steady PT elongation [16]. However, upon PT arrival at the FG, FER-dependent accumulation of ROS around the FA leads to PT rupture [17]. Thus, the two ANX RLKs seem to ensure PT integrity until its arrival at the FA, and activation of the FER-dependent PT reception pathway leads to ROS accumulation and PT rupture [14,15,17].

Recently, binding of the 5kDa small peptide RAPID ALKANIZATION FACTOR1 (RALF1) to FER was shown in roots, where it leads to phosphorylation of plasma-membrane H+-ATPase 2 that regulates cell elongation [18]. However, it remains unclear whether pollen-expressed RALF-like proteins bind to FER in the synergids and activate the PT reception signaling cascade. In addition to FER, the following factors were shown to play a role in PT reception: LORELEI (LRE), a synergid-expressed glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein [19], and NORTIA (NTA), a mildew-resistance locus O (MLO) family protein that accumulates at the FA in a FER-dependent manner upon PT arrival [20]. lre-1/LRE and nta-1/nta-1 mutants show the fer-like PT overgrowth phenotype in 28% and 22% of the ovules, respectively [19,20]. Furthermore, the abstinence by mutual consent (amc) mutant, which affects a peroxin involved in protein import into peroxisomes, shows the fer-like phenotype only if mutant PTs contact mutant FGs [21]. This particular phenotype suggests a disrupted communication between both gametophytes due to missing signaling molecules from peroxisomes, possibly ROS. Recently, the first male gametophytic factors affecting PT reception were identified [22,23]. PTs of a triple mutant disrupting three MYB transcription factors (myb97-1, myb101-4, and myb120-3) fail to rupture and release the sperm in 60–70% of targeted ovules [22,23]. However, the target genes of these transcription factors, which may be involved in signaling, remain to be identified.

Here, we describe two novel mutants impaired in PT reception, turan (tun) and evan (evn). Interestingly, tun/TUN and evn/EVN plants show the same female gametophytic fer-like PT overgrowth phenotype but have distinct pollen defects. Whereas evn mutant pollen grains degenerate before maturation, tun mutant grains develop normally, but PTs burst immediately after in vitro germination, reminiscent of the anx1/2 phenotype. TUN and EVN are both involved in protein N-glycosylation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and encode a putative uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein and a dolichol kinase, respectively. The mutants do not affect the abundance and subcellular localization of FER, NTA, and LRE fusion proteins, suggesting that aberrant glycosylation may affect the function of at least one of these membrane proteins. In tun mutant pollen grains, ANX1 fused to the yellow fluorescent protein (ANX1-YFP) is degraded by the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway. This leads to premature PT rupture, indicating that the ANX1/2 RLKs are targets of TUN-dependent N-glycosylation.


tun and evn Mutants Show a fer-like Pollen Tube Overgrowth Phenotype

To gain more insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in PT reception in Arabidopsis, we conducted a forward genetic screen that yielded several mutants showing a fer-like PT overgrowth phenotype. The three mutants with the highest penetrance were chosen for further characterization, but two turned out to be allelic to each other (see below). Like fer, both mutants were named after Etruscan goddesses of fertility and fate, namely turan (tun) and evan (evn) [24]. In tun-1/TUN, evn-1/EVN, and evn-2/EVN heterozygous mutants 12% (n = 1,318), 20% (n = 1,233), and 22% (n = 320) of the ovules remained unfertilized, respectively, compared to only 1.5% (n = 1,389) in wild-type plants (Table 1). In unfertilized ovules, the PT continued to grow inside the FG, failed to arrest its growth, and did not rupture to release the sperm cells (Fig 1A–1C and S1C Fig).

Fig 1. tun and evn ovules display pollen tube overgrowth and increased callose accumulation at the filiform apparatus.

(A–C) Aniline Blue staining of callose in PT cell walls 2 d after pollination (DAP). (A) PT reception in a wild-type FG. Arrowhead indicates site of PT growth arrest. (B–C) PT overgrowth in tun-1 (B) and evn-1 mutant FGs (C). Asterisks indicate PT overgrowth. (D–F) β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining of synergid marker ET2634 2 d after emasculation (DAE) in wild-type (D), tun-1 (E), and evn-1 mutant FGs (F). Arrow indicates abnormal structure at the FA. (G–I) Chloral hydrate clearings of ovules 2 DAE in wild-type (G), tun-1 (H), and evn-1 mutants (I). Arrows indicate abnormal structure at the FA. (J–L) Aniline Blue staining of callose in 6 μm sections of wild-type (J), tun-1 (K), and evn-1 ovules 2 DAE (L). Boxes represent close-ups of indicated regions, whereby mutant close-ups in (K) and (L) were captured with reduced exposure time compared to the wild type (J). Scale bars in A–F and J–L = 20 μm; scale bars in G–I = 10 μm.

To ensure that the PT overgrowth phenotype was not caused by cell specification defects in these mutants, a β-glucuronidase (GUS) synergid fate marker (ET2634) was analyzed. In both tun and evn mutant ovules, GUS expression was restricted to the synergids (Fig 1D–1F), indicating that their identity was not affected. However, some ovules showed an abnormal structure at the micropylar pole of the synergids (Fig 1E). To further investigate this structure, ovule membrane staining, clearings, and sections were analyzed 2 d after emasculation (DAE). Although membrane staining revealed no change in overall synergid morphology in the mutants (S2 Fig and S1 Data), approximately 50% of the mature FGs in cleared ovules of tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN mutants showed the abnormal structure in the FA region (Fig 1G1I). Using Aniline Blue staining on ovule sections, we found that approximately 50% of the mature FGs showed increased callose deposition at the micropylar pole in both mutants (Fig 1J–1L). However, this did not influence PT attraction and reception, since all ovules could attract PTs, and over 60% of mutant FGs were fertilized. To investigate whether callose deposition in tun and evn FGs is an indicator of a defense-related response [25], expression of several plant defense pathway genes was tested in mutant pistils 2 DAE, but no up-regulation was observed (S3 Fig).

In summary, we identified two novel members of the PT reception pathway in the synergids, which are required for successful reproduction. In both mutants, synergid differentiation is normal, but callose accumulates at the micropylar pole of mutant FGs that, however, does not mediate the failure in PT reception.

tun and evn Mutants Show Additional but Distinct Male Gametophytic Defects

Self-pollination of both tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN mutant plants yielded only heterozygous and wild-type offspring. Attempts to propagate the mutants by crossing wild-type plants with mutant pollen produced no mutant progeny either (n = 96 plants per mutant; Table 1). These results suggest that not only the female but also the male gametophyte is affected in the tun and evn mutants. To further investigate this hypothesis, tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN plants were crossed to quartet (qrt/qrt) mutants [26,27], where microspores fail to separate after meiosis, forming tetrads of pollen grains. Heterozygous mutants in a qrt/qrt background facilitate the analysis of pollen defects because, within one tetrad, two microspores carry the wild-type and two the mutant allele. In vitro pollen germination experiments revealed that in tun-1/TUN mutants, pollen development was normal, but 63% ± 1.5% (n = 441) of mature PTs burst immediately after germination, compared to 5% ± 5% (n = 128) in the wild type (Fig 2A–2C and Table 1). This pollen phenotype of tun is reminiscent of double mutants disrupting ANX1/2, the pollen-specific homologs of FER [14,15]. In contrast to the wild type, where nearly all pollen were intact at maturity (n = 600), 54% ± 5% (n = 800) of the pollen grains degenerated before maturation in evn-1/EVN mutants, indicating general defects in pollen development (Fig 2D and 2E and Table 1). 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining of different developmental stages revealed that evn mutant pollen degenerates during the early tricellular stage (n = 2,816; Fig 2E and S4G Fig). Mutant pollen grains completed the second mitosis to form tricellular pollen, but comparison with the wild-type pollen within the same tetrad revealed a developmental delay in some cases (S4G Fig). Thus, pollen maturation seems disrupted in pollen grains lacking EVN activity.

Fig 2. Distinct pollen defects in tun and evn mutants.

(A) Pollen in vitro germination assay of qrt/qrt pollen grains. (B) Pollen in vitro germination assay of tun-1/TUN;qrt/qrt pollen. Arrows indicate PT bursting. (C) Graph of PT bursting counts in qrt/qrt and tun-1/TUN;qrt/qrt pollen. (D) Pollen in vitro germination assay of evn-1/EVN;qrt/qrt mutant pollen. Arrowheads indicate degenerated pollen grains. (E) Graph of degenerating pollen grain counts at different stages of evn-1/EVN mutants after DAPI staining. Stage four refers to the bicellular and early tricellular, stage three to the tricellular, stage two to the late tricellular and early mature, and stage one to the mature pollen stage. Scale bars: 20 μm. (F–G) Gene model of TUN (F) and EVN (G) with mutant alleles. Ethane methyl sulfonate (EMS) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are indicated by lines, T-DNA insertions by triangles.

Reciprocal crosses between tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN mutants with Col-0 wild-type plants showed that the fer-like PT overgrowth phenotype was caused by a female gametophytic defect. Whereas mutant ovules fertilized by wild-type pollen showed the fer-like PT overgrowth phenotype, wild-type pistils pollinated with pollen from heterozygous mutants showed no phenotype (S5 Fig) as expected, since no functional mutant PTs are formed. Both evn and tun pollen defects were fully penetrant (i.e., affecting male gametophyte viability and PT growth, respectively) with a male transmission efficiency of 0% (n = 96 plants per mutant; Table 1). In contrast, female transmission efficiency was reduced to 74.5% (n = 96) and 28% (n = 96) in tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN mutants, respectively (Table 1).

Taken together, these results show that tun and evn mutants display distinct male gametophytic defects, affecting male gametophyte growth and viability, respectively. However, abnormal PT reception is caused by a female gametophytic defect, leading to the decreased female transmission of the mutant alleles.

TUN Encodes a Putative UDP-Glycosyltransferase and EVN a Dolichol Kinase

In order to identify the causative mutations, we developed SNP-ratio mapping (SRM) [28]. SRM enables the mapping of heterozygous mutant individuals by next-generation sequencing. Briefly, the segregation ratios of EMS-induced SNPs are used to identify the causative SNP that segregates in a 1:1 ratio in a backcross mutant population versus a 1:3 ratio for unlinked SNPs segregating in the background.

Applying SRM to tun-1/TUN mutants revealed a stop codon in the sixth exon of At1g16570 (Fig 2F) [28], which encodes a putative UDP-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein belonging to the glycosyltransferase (GT) family 33, whereof TUN is the only member in Arabidopsis. In evn-1/EVN mutants, SRM identified a stop codon in the eleventh exon of At3g45040 (Fig 2F and S6 Fig and S1 Table), which encodes the only dolichol kinase in the Arabidopsis genome [29]. Thus, both TUN and EVN encode proteins that are likely playing roles in protein N-glycosylation. Whereas EVN as the only dolichol kinase may have a general role, TUN potentially acts in a more specific manner, since a total of 27 GT families have been identified in Arabidopsis. Finally, a second allele of evn (evn-2) was found in the same EMS screen and identified by a combination of SRM (S7 Fig) and classical map-based cloning (S1 Text). This allele has a premature stop codon in the last exon and displays similar PT overgrowth (22%; n = 320) and pollen phenotypes (50% ± 0%; n = 200) as evn-1 (Fig 2F and Table 1 and S1C Fig, S1G Fig and S7 Fig and S2 Table).

To confirm that the correct genes had been identified, T-DNA insertion lines disrupting them were analyzed. As described previously, the T-DNA allele tun-2 (SAIL_400_A01) has an insertion in the fourth exon of At1g16570 and displays a PT overgrowth phenotype (15%; n = 513; Fig 2F and Table 1 and S1B Fig) [28] and PT bursting in vitro (44% ± 6.5%; n = 404; Table 1 and S1F Fig) similar to the EMS allele tun-1, confirming the correct identification of TUN by SRM. Likewise, evn-3 (SAIL_529_E06) has an insertion in the eighth exon of At3g45040 and shows the same female (28%; n = 337) and male (50% ± 0%; n = 495) [29] phenotypes as the EMS mutants evn-1 and evn-2 (Fig 2G and Table 1 and S1D Fig and S1H Fig).

In summary, TUN and EVN both encode proteins potentially involved in protein N-glycosylation, suggesting that proper N-glycosylation of proteins involved in PT reception is critical for the gametophytic dialogue during PT reception.

TUN and EVN Are Involved in Protein N-Glycosylation, and Down-Regulation Causes Distinct Vegetative Phenotypes

N-linked protein glycosylation occurs as proteins transit through the ER [30]. To gain insight into the subcellular localization of the TUN and EVN proteins, and to confirm their identity by functional complementation, native promoter::protein-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions were transformed into mutant plants. The pTUN::TUN-GFP construct complemented both the female and the male phenotypes (Table 1). In ovules, the strongest GFP signal was observed in the FG including the synergids, which showed a ring shaped signal around their nuclei, and throughout the PT (S8A–S8C Fig). The pEVN::EVN-GFP construct neither showed GFP expression nor complemented the phenotypes, suggesting that the construct was not functional in planta, likely due to missing regulatory elements.

Colocalization studies of p35S::TUN-GFP and p35S::EVN-GFP, where the fusion proteins were expressed under the constitutive, viral 35S promoter, with different subcellular markers were performed in transiently transformed onion and tobacco epidermis cells. They showed ER localization of both proteins (S8D and S8E Fig), supporting potential roles of TUN and EVN in protein N-glycosylation.

As no homozygous mutants could be recovered, we used RNA interference (RNAi) to down-regulate expression of TUN and EVN using the 35S promoter. Four independent TUN(RNAi) and EVN(RNAi) lines with greatly reduced expression, down to 12% and 13% of wild-type levels, respectively (S9 Fig and S1 Data), were chosen for further analysis. To investigate the function of TUN and EVN in a biochemical analysis of glycoproteins, potential changes in glycoprotein abundance in knockdown seedlings were assessed by a lectin blot using Concanavalin A (ConA), which mainly binds to terminal mannosyl and glucosyl residues of glycoproteins. Both, TUN(RNAi) and EVN(RNAi) seedlings showed altered glycoprotein abundance and mobility compared to both the wild type and ost3/6-2, a mutant disrupted in a subunit of an oligosaccharyltransferase that acts later in the glycosylation pathway (Fig 3) [31].

Fig 3. ConA reveals altered glycoprotein patterns in TUN(RNAi) and EVN(RNAi) seedlings.

Lectin blot using ConA of a wild-type, three independent TUN(RNAi) lines, two independent EVN(RNAi) lines, and two ost3/6-2 control plants. Arrowheads indicate wild-type bands with differential abundance and/or mobility in knockdown lines, marked by asterisks. 55kDa fraction represents a Commassie-Brilliant Blue stained loading control.

Furthermore, TUN(RNAi) knockdown lines displayed a vegetative phenotype reminiscent of fer/fer mutants (Fig 4) [20,32]. The severity and frequency of the dwarf phenotype correlated with the expression level of TUN in the TUN(RNAi) lines (Fig 4C and 4G and S9 Fig). Seedlings on plates looked normal, but in soil, some plants remained small, accumulated anthocyanins, and eventually died without further growth (Fig 4C). It is possible that TUN expression in these seedlings was very low, but it could not be determined due to early lethality. These results indicate that TUN is essential for vegetative development. In contrast, EVN(RNAi) knockdown plants showed no obvious phenotype (Fig 4D and 4H and S9 Fig), suggesting that low levels of EVN are sufficient to support normal vegetative growth.

Fig 4. TUN(RNAi) lines show fer-like vegetative dwarf phenotype.

(A–D) Plant size of 30-d-old seedlings of wild-type (A), fer-2/fer-2 (B), TUN(RNAi) (C), and EVN(RNAi) lines (D). Asterisks indicate TUN(RNAi) seedlings, that accumulate athocyanins and degenerate without further growth. (E–H) Plant size of adult wild-type (E), fer-2/fer-2 (F), TUN(RNAi) (G), and EVN(RNAi) (H) plants. (F) Left plant is at the same developmental stage as wild-type, TUN(RNAi), and EVN(RNAi) individuals. Scale bars: 1 cm. All lines are in the Col-0 background.

Taken together, both TUN and EVN play a role in protein N-glycosylation but only TUN seems required for normal vegetative growth and development.

Down-Regulation of TUN Does Not Cause Deglycosylation of FER

Protein N-glycosylation plays important roles in many processes, including protein folding, protein stabilization, protein targeting [33], and receptor–ligand interactions [34]. In tun mutants, we observed fer-like PT overgrowth, a fer-like vegetative phenotype, and anx1/2-like PT bursting. The FER, ANX1, and ANX2 proteins have multiple predicted glycosylation sites [11], indicating that TUN may be involved in the specific glycosylation of this RLK subfamily. To investigate whether FER requires TUN for glycosylation, a TUN(RNAi) construct was transformed into plants expressing a pFER::FER-GFP translational fusion protein. In the case of a complete absence of potential N-glycans attached to FER, we would expect a smaller size of the under-glycosylated FER protein in TUN(RNAi) seedlings compared to the wild type [31]. However, no obvious difference in size, indicating a loss of glycosylation, was detected between FER-GFP in TUN(RNAi) and wild-type seedlings by immunoblot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody (S10 Fig). In contrast, a clear shift in size was seen when FER-GFP was deglycosylated by Endoglycosidase H (EndoH, a high mannose N-glycan deglycosylase) treatment in vitro (S10 Fig).

These data suggest that FER-GFP is not completely deglycosylated in TUN(RNAi) seedlings. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that residual levels of TUN activity in the RNAi lines were able to partially glycosylate FER in seedlings, or that FER-GFP is misglycosylated rather than deglycosylated.

FER, NTA, and LRE Are Not Mislocalized in tun and evn Mutant Embryo Sacs

Since tun and evn show fer-like PT overgrowth, we hypothesized that the stability and/or localization of known female players involved in PT reception could be compromised in tun and evn mutant FGs. Therefore, FER-GFP, NTA-GFP, and LRE-Citrine reporter constructs were introduced into the tun and evn mutant backgrounds and analyzed for changes in expression and localization. First, pFER::FER-GFP and pNTA::NTA-GFP translational fusions were analyzed in tun-2/TUN and evn-3/EVN siliques 2 DAE. Whereas NTA-GFP was shown to localize in vesicle-like structures throughout the cytoplasm before fertilization [20], FER-GFP is localized to the FA in the synergids [12]. Neither NTA-GFP nor FER-GFP localization was changed in tun and evn mutants (Fig 5A–5F and S11 Fig and S1 Data), indicating that PT overgrowth in tun and evn is not caused by mislocalization of FER and NTA.

Fig 5. NTA, FER and LRE show proper localization in tun and evn mutant embryo sacs.

(A–I) Confocal microscope analysis of fluorescently labeled proteins. (A–C) Vesicle-associated NTA-GFP localization in the cytoplasm of a wild-type (A), tun-2 (B), and evn-3 FG (C). (D–F) FER-GFP at the FA and in membranes of sporophytic tissue of a wild-type (D), tun-2 (E), and evn-3 FG (F). (G–I) Extracellular localization of LRE-Citrine in a wild-type (G), tun-2 (H), and evn-3 FG (I). Scale bars: 20 μm.

Although no reporter gene was available for LRE, encoding a predicted GPI-anchored protein, in situ hybridization showed LRE expression predominantly in synergids before fertilization [19]. A LRE-GFP fusion protein did not produce a detectable fluorescent signal in transient transformations [19], possibly due to the exposure of GFP to the acidic pH in the apoplast. However, LRE is a good candidate for a target of EVN because the yeast mutant corresponding to evn, secretory59 (sec59), is depleted in GPI-anchored proteins [35]. Therefore, we produced a LRE reporter using the pH-stable fluorescent protein Citrine [36], and cloned it between the predicted signal peptide and GPI-anchor of LRE [19]. The LRE-Citrine fusion protein localized to the surface of the synergids, appearing different from the FA localization of FER-GFP (Fig 5D and 5G). Thus, LRE-Citrine likely faces the extracellular space towards the micropyle, where PT reception is initiated upon PT arrival. However, LRE-Citrine production and localization were unaffected in evn and tun mutants (Fig 5G–5I and S11 Fig and S1 Data).

In summary, PT reception defects in tun and evn FGs are not caused by misexpression or mislocalization of FER, NTA, and LRE. However, it is possible that protein function is impaired due to misglycosylated residues—particularly in FER.

ANX1-YFP and ANX2-YFP Are Not Detectable in tun Mutant Pollen Grains

To investigate whether the PT bursting phenotype of tun is caused by alterations in ANX1/2 protein abundance and/or localization, we transformed tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt mutants with pACA9::ANX1-YFP and pACA9::ANX2-YFP, respectively, and crossed tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt to plants expressing pACA9::ANX1-YFP [16]. We analyzed four independent lines homozygous for the pACA9::ANX1-YFP transgene (T2 or F2 generation) and two independent lines hemizygous for the pACA9::ANX2-YFP transgene (T1 generation) and heterozygous for tun-2, respectively. Although the tun-2/TUN mutants were homozygous for pACA9::ANX1-YFP, we always found ANX1-YFP expression in only two pollen grains per tetrad (Fig 6A–6C). However, in wild-type segregants homozygous pACA9::ANX1-YFP fluorescence could be observed (Fig 6A). Furthermore, tun-2/TUN mutants hemizygous for pACA9::ANX2-YFP displayed only 30.2% ± 0.7% (n = 156 tetrads) fluorescent pollen grains, compared to 50% ± 0% (n = 150 tetrads) in wild-type tetrads. Since only fluorescent tetrads were counted under the epifluorescence microscope, a reduction of 50% fluorescence of a hemizygous reporter would result in 33,3% fluorescent pollen grains.

Fig 6. ANX1-YFP fluorescence is not detectable in tun mutant pollen grains.

(A–D) Confocal microscope analysis of ANX1-YFP expression under a pollen-specific promoter. (A) ANX1-YFP expression in TUN/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP (wild-type segregants homozygous for the reporter gene). (B) ANX1-YFP expression in TUN/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/- (wild-type segregants hemizygous for the reporter gene). (C) ANX1-YFP expression in tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP mutant tetrads. Arrowheads indicate missing fluorescence in tun pollen grains. (D) ANX1-YFP expression in tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP mutant tetrads after Kifunensine (Kif) treatment. (E) ANX1-YFP expression in tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP mutant tetrads after mock treatment for fluorescence intensity decrease comparison. (F–H) ANX1-YFP expression in tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP mutant tetrads after Eeyarestatin I (EerI) treatment. (F) 10 μm EerI recovers ANX1-YFP fluorescence in tun pollen grains. (G) Higher concentrations of EerI can lead to cytosolic inclusions (asterisk) or pollen grain burst (arrow). (H) ANX1-YFP fluorescence recovery in several tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt;ANX1-YFP/ANX1-YFP mutant tetrads after EerI treatment. Residual fluorescence signal from the pollen coat is autofluorescence. Scale bars: 20 μm.

Thus, ANX1-YFP and ANX2-YFP are not detectable in tun mutant pollen grains, possibly because they are subjected to ERAD of misfolded proteins [37]. Indeed, treatment with Kifunensine (Kif), an inhibitor of the ERAD pathway [38] resulted in the recovery of ANX1-YFP fluorescence in tun pollen grains (Fig 6D). Because the outcomes of Kif treatments were variable, likely dependent on how well the drug was taken up in different experiments, we also used the ERAD inhibitor Eeyarestatin I (EerI) [39], which resulted in a more consistent recovery of ANX1-YFP fluorescence (Fig 6F–6H and S12 Fig and S1 Data). These results indicate that the premature bursting of tun PTs is caused by the absence of ANX1 and ANX2.

Therefore, TUN seems to be involved in ANX1-YFP and ANX2-YFP glycosylation, and the aberrant glycosylation of these fusion proteins leads to their degradation by the ERAD pathway. However, although less likely, we cannot exclude that ANX1/2-YFP proteins get degraded because another protein required for their stability is misglycosylated and subject to the ERAD pathway.


TUN and EVN Encode Proteins of the Early N-Glycosylation Pathway

In this study, we characterized two mutants, tun and evn, isolated in a screen for defects in PT reception. They have similar PT overgrowth phenotypes in the FG, but play distinct roles during pollen development, PT integrity, and vegetative growth. Both genes encode proteins that are involved in N-linked protein glycosylation, indicating that this cotranslational protein modification is essential to various developmental processes.

N-linked glycosylation affects protein folding, stability, transport, and activity [40]. It is a multistep process starting with the assembly of an oligosaccharide, containing N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), mannose (Man), and glucose (Glc), on a phosphorylated membrane-bound polyisoprenoid lipid carrier, dolichol [30]. The assembly starts on the cytosolic side and finishes on the lumenal side of the ER, yielding the end product Glc3-Man9-GlcNAc2 [30]. The second step is the cotranslational transfer of the oligosaccharide to an asparagine in the Asn-X-Ser/Thr sequon, where X can be any amino acid except proline [41]. The last step is ER-associated quality control, which ensures proper folding of N-glycosylated proteins and their subsequent exit of the ER [37].

EVN encodes a dolichol kinase, which plays an early role in the N-glycosylation pathway [29]. The SEC59 dolichol kinase in yeast catalyzes the cytidine-triphosphate-dependent phosphorylation of ER-membrane-bound dolichol [35]. As EVN can complement the yeast sec59 mutant, it seems to perform the same biochemical function [29]. Phosphorylated dolichol (Dol-P) serves as carrier for the assembly of the oligosaccharide on the cytosolic side of the ER and, additionally, as a carrier for the monosaccharides Man and Glc in the ER lumen for GPI-anchor synthesis. In Arabidopsis, EVN is a single copy gene with characterized orthologs in yeast [42], mammals [43,44], and humans [45], where dolichol kinase deficiency results in hypoglycosylation and lethality [46,47]. We never retrieved any homozygous mutants for evn, due to its complete male gametophytic lethality. As EVN(RNAi) knockdown plants do not show any obvious vegetative phenotype, a low, residual gene activity might be sufficient for normal plant growth.

TUN encodes a putative UDP-glycosyltransferase superfamily protein belonging to GT family 33, whereof TUN is the only member in Arabidopsis. The yeast ortholog ALG1 encodes a beta-1,4-mannosyltransferase, which transfers the first Man from the GDP-D-Man substrate to the Dol-PP-GlcNAC2 acceptor on the cytosolic side of the ER [48,49]. ALG1 resides in the ER membrane, forming homodimers and heterodimers with ALG2 and ALG11, respectively [50]. Under nonpermissive conditions, temperature-sensitive alg1-1 mutants produce no Man-containing oligosaccharides [48], leading to lethality [51]. As for evn, no homozygous tun mutants were recovered because of complete male gametophytic lethality. However, the strong dwarf phenotype and dying seedlings in TUN(RNAi) lines indicate that TUN is also required for vegetative growth and development. In plants, the importance of protein N-glycosylation during embryogenesis, vegetative development, and plant defense has been demonstrated by various phenotypes of N-glycosylation mutants [52].

The subcellular localization of TUN and EVN fusion proteins in the ER and the altered glycoprotein patterns observed in RNAi lines for both genes indicate that the plant proteins play similar roles in protein glycosylation as their yeast orthologs.

Localization of Known Members of the Pollen Tube Reception Pathway Is Not Affected in evn and tun Synergids

We showed that mutations in EVN and TUN in the FG lead to PT reception defects. Due to their protein localization to the ER, it is likely that EVN and TUN do not directly mediate male–female gametophyte interactions during PT reception, but that an impaired glycosylation pathway affects the function of female players involved in this process. However, the localization of translational reporter gene fusions with FER, NTA, and LRE, three known components of the PT reception pathway, was unaffected in FGs of evn-3/EVN and tun-2/TUN plants. This was not surprising for NTA-GFP, which has no predicted glycosylation sites. However, LRE-Citrine fluorescence was expected to be reduced or even absent in evn mutant ovules, since the yeast sec59 mutant is depleted in GPI-anchored proteins [35]. However, EVN and SEC59 display only 22% amino acid identity (ClustalW). Although the plant protein is able to complement the yeast sec59 mutant [29], the two proteins may not play identical roles in planta and/or other, undescribed kinases could take over EVN function in mutant plants.

However, normal protein abundance and localization does not ensure proper function. The fact that tun mutants show fer-like PT overgrowth, a fer-like vegetative phenotype, and anx1/2-like PT bursting, suggests that the FER and ANX1/2 RLKs are affected in this mutant. FER has nine putative N-glycosylation sites, eight of which reside in the extracellular malectin-like domain [11]. In Xenopus laevis, malectin is an ER-localized lectin, which selectively binds carbohydrates and is involved in the ER-quality control of glycoproteins [53,54]. The extracellular, glycosylated malectin-like domain of FER suggests that its ligand could contain sugar residues and/or that proper glycosylation of this domain is essential for ligand binding. However, potential deficiencies in protein glycosylation in tun and evn mutant FGs did not affect polar localization of FER-GFP to the FA, and down-regulation of TUN did not cause a complete loss of N-linked glycans in FER-GFP in seedlings. But it is possible that only some N-glycans are absent or that N-glycan composition is altered. Therefore, while FER-GFP localization is unaffected, functions such as ligand binding and/or recognition and subsequent signal transduction could be affected. This has been shown to be the case for the plant immunity leucine-rich repeat (LRR) RLK EF-Tu receptor (EFR), which shows impaired ligand binding as a consequence of underglycosylation [34]. Just recently, binding of the 5kDa small peptide RALF1 to FER was shown in roots [18]. However, RALF1 is neither expressed in PTs nor in synergid cells. But there are 34 RALF-like peptides with various expression patterns throughout the plant [18]. In the case of RALF1, N-glycosylation does not seem to play a role in FER binding, since the processed peptide lacks any predicted N-glycosylation site. Out of seven highly pollen-expressed RALF-like peptides, RALF-like4 and RALF-like26 are the only two with a predicted N-glycosylation site. It is conceivable that, unlike in animals [53,54], the malectin-like ligand-binding domain of FER has no conserved carbohydrate binding capacity in plants. Instead, the glycosylation state of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor could be more important than glycosylation of the ligand.

PT reception at the FA is essential for double fertilization and thus successful reproduction. It is conceivable that a “dual recognition system” exists, where the protein backbone of the receptor is required for interactions with the ligand, which are further enhanced by N-linked glycans, thereby increasing the chances for successful PT reception. Such a dual recognition system has been described for gamete interactions in mammals [55], where the glycoprotein mZP3 in the egg cell’s extracellular matrix, the zona pellucida, is responsible for sperm binding [56]. While sperm binding is improved by glycosylated mZP3 proteins, unglycosylated mZP3 can also bind sperm. Accordingly, a sperm protein or protein complex interacts with the glycans and/or the protein backbone of mZP3 depending on its glycosylation state. Thus, this dual adhesion system ensures better sperm–egg binding but allows gamete interaction even if glycan composition is disturbed, increasing the chance for successful fertilization [57]. In plants, the existence of such a dual recognition system could explain the reduced penetrance of the PT overgrowth phenotype in tun and evn since the female protein component, even if not glycosylated properly, could still partially recognize the male ligand. Despite the similarities of the fer and tun phenotypes, further biochemical investigations are required to investigate whether indeed the FER RLK and/or other components of the PT reception pathway are affected in the tun mutant.

ANX1-YFP Gets Degraded by the ERAD Pathway in tun Pollen Grains

Apart from the phenotypes it shares with fer, tun also shows anx1/2-like PT bursting. ANX1 and ANX2 have seven and four potential N-glycosylation sites, respectively [11], with all four predicted glycosylation sites of ANX2 being located in the extracellular domain and conserved in ANX1. ANX1-YFP and ANX2-YFP fluorescence is not detectable in tun-2 mutant pollen grains, but ANX1-YFP fluorescence is recovered after treatment with two ERAD inhibitors. This finding suggests that ANX1-YFP is misglycosylated in tun pollen grains and is therefore degraded by the ERAD pathway, which is induced when N-glycan-dependent protein folding fails [37]. The misfolded protein is recognized by ubiquitin ligases, ubiquitinatinylated, retrotranslocated to the cytosol, and degraded by the proteasome [37]. For instance, the LRR-RLK BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE1, which contains multiple N-glycosylation sites [58], is such an N-glycan-dependent ERAD target [59,60].

Since FER, NTA, and LRE fusion proteins did not show any alteration in protein abundance or localization in tun mutant ovules, the effect on ANX1-YFP and ANX2-YFP seems to be a pollen-specific effect rather than a general loss of glycosylated proteins in the plant. Specificity of ERAD has been described for the LRR-RLKs EFR and FLAGELLIN-SENSITIVE2 (FLS2), involved in plant innate immunity [61]. Both LRR-RLKs are N-glycosylated membrane proteins, but mutations in two members of the ER quality control pathway affected only EFR but not FLS2 [61]. Similarly, the closely related CrRLK1Ls FER, ANX1, and ANX2 might all be misglycosylated in the tun mutant, but only ANX1/2 are degraded via the ERAD pathway, explaining the absence of ANX1/2-YFP but the normal abundance of FER-GFP. This would also explain the difference in the penetrance of male and female gametophytic phenotypes; although FER is likely misglycosylated, it is still localized to the FA, thereby allowing successful PT reception to a certain degree, consistent with the residual transmission of tun through the FG. In contrast, ANX1/2 are degraded by the ERAD pathway leading to a fully penetrant anx1/2-like phenotype and the complete absence of transmission through the pollen.


The characterization of TUN and EVN demonstrated that protein N-glycosylation is important for various developmental processes. Impaired PT reception and anx1/2-like PT rupture in tun mutants appears to be linked to misglycosylated FER and ANX1/2, respectively, the most closely related members of the CrRLK1L subfamily of RLKs. The defects in PT reception observed in the tun and evn glycosylation mutants provides a first indication that plants evolved similar mechanisms to ensure fertilization as mammals, where both N-glycan–protein and protein–protein interactions appear to act synergistically to guarantee gamete binding and, thus, enhance the chance for successful fertilization.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Plant growth conditions were as described [62]. T-DNA insertion lines were obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (NASC). The qrt1-2/qrt1-2 mutant [26], was a gift from J. F. Harper (University of Nevada, Reno). The pACA9::ANX1-YFP, pACA9::ANX2-YFP, pFER::FER-GFP, and pNTA::NTA-GFP lines were described previously [12,16,20]. Crosses were done by emasculating wild-type Col-0, tun/TUN and evn/EVN flower buds, followed by pollination with respective pollen 2 DAE. Identification of the EMS alleles, cloning procedures, genotyping, and gene expression analysis are described in S1 Text.

Aniline Blue Staining

To visualize PTs, siliques were selected around 2 DAP. Sepals and petals were removed, and siliques were fixed in 9:1 ethanol (EtOH):acetic acid overnight at 4°C. Aniline Blue staining was previously described [10], and sample analysis was done using a Leica DM6000B epifluorescence microscope. Callose staining of semithin ovule sections is described in S1 Text.

In Vitro Pollen Germination Analysis

In vitro pollen germination was previously described [14]. Pollen grains and tubes were imaged using the differential interfering contrast on a Leica DM6000B microscope.

FM4-64 Membrane Staining

Wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN pistils were dissected in ice cold 100 mM FM4-64 Dye (Life Technologies) solution on microscope slides, and ovules were covered with a cover slip. Microscope slides were covered with aluminum foil and left on ice for 3–4 h. Fluorescence of ovule membranes was analyzed using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.

Ovule Clearing

Flower buds were emasculated and collected 2 DAE, carved open longitudinally on the sides, and fixed in 9:1 EtOH:acetic acid over night at 4°C. Samples were washed in an EtOH series (85%, 70%, 50%, and 30% for 30 min each) and clearing solution (chloral hydrate:glycerol:water (8:1:2, w:v:v)) was added. Siliques were dissected and ovules were analyzed using a Leica DMR microscope.

β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Staining

The synergid marker ET2634 [63] was crossed to tun-1/TUN and evn-1/EVN mutants. Homozygous F2 individuals were emasculated and siliques were stained for GUS expression 2 DAE as previously described [20]. Stained samples were dissected and analyzed using a Leica DMR microscope.

Western Blot and Deglycosylation Analysis

Protein extraction from 10-d-old seedlings (approximately 400; wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN plants carrying pFER::FER-GFP, and ost3/6-2 (SALK_067271)) was conducted by grinding them in a mixer mill and adding extraction buffer (50 mM Tris pH7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 0,5% Triton X-100, and a tablet of Complete Mini protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)). Extracts were incubated on ice for 15 min and centrifuged for 3 min at 14,000 rpm (Eppendorf centrifuge 5424 with a FA-45-24-11). Protein extracts were boiled at 95°C with SDS loading buffer (63 mM Tris-HCl (pH = 6.8), 15% glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.15% bromophenol blue, 7 mM DTT) and loaded on a 10% gel followed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. After blotting to a PVDF membrane (Millipore Immobilon Transfer Membrane), the membrane was blocked in 5% milk in TBST (20 mM Tris (pH = 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20), and was probed with anti-GFP B-2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech), washed with TBST, treated with the secondary antibody (goat antimouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated [Pierce]), and detected using chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Dura [ThermoScientific]). For ConA (Sigma-Aldrich) detection, the SDS gel was blotted to PVDF membrane and labeled according to manufacturer’s recommendations. To assess protein amounts, the reducing SDS gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 (Fluka) solution (0.1% Coomassie, 10% glacial acid, 40% methanol) and destained with destaining solution (20% methanol, 10% acetic acid). EndoH (New England Biolabs) digestion was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions under reducing conditions.

Confocal Microscopy

Confocal microscopy was previously described [20], with the exception that a Leica SP5 confocal microscope was used.

Kifunensine Treatment

Whole inflorescences were cut off the plant and incubated in 50 μM Kif solution (Sigma-Aldrich). After 2 d under constant light at 22°C, fluorescence in mature pollen grains was analyzed using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.

Eeyarestatin I Treatment

Anthers of flower buds (around stage 11) were dissected and pollen grains were placed on pollen germination media [14] containing various concentrations of EerI (Sigma). The pollen was incubated for 20 h at 22°C in a moisture incubation box. Fluorescence in pollen grains was analyzed using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Additional alleles confirm female and male gametophytic phenotypes.

(A–D) Aniline Blue staining of callose in PT cell walls 2 DAP. (A) Normal PT reception in a wild-type FG. (B–D) PT overgrowth in tun-2 (B), evn-2 (C), and evn-3 mutant FGs (D). Asterisks mark PT overgrowth phenotype. (E–H) In vitro pollen germination analysis. (E) Normal pollen germination of the wild type. (F) PT bursting phenotype in tun-2/TUN;qrt/qrt. Arrows indicate bursting PTs. (G) Degenerated pollen phenotype in evn-2/EVN;qrt/qrt. (H) Degenerated pollen phenotype in evn-3/EVN;qrt/qrt. Arrowheads indicate degenerated pollen. Scale bars: 20 μm.



S2 Fig. Synergid morphology is similar in wild-type, tun-2, and evn-3 embryo sacs.

(A–B) FM4-64 staining of membranes in ovules (pistils 2 DAE). (A) Ovule with normal synergid cells. (B) Wild-type ovule with obliquely oriented synergid cells. Abbreviations: CC: central cell, EC: egg cell, Sy: synergid cell, FA: filiform apparatus. (C) Quantification of the two morphological types in wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN ovules.



S3 Fig. Callose deposition in tun and evn ovules is not due to upregulated plant defense responses.

RT-PCR of PLANT DEFENSIN1.2 (PDF1.2), involved in the jasmonate-dependent plant defense response, PATHOGENESIS RELATED PROTEIN1 (PR1), involved in the systemic acquired resistance, PR5 and PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA-LYASE1 (PAL1), involved in the salicylic acid response, in evn-1/EVN, tun-1/TUN, evn-2/EVN, and wild-type pistils 2 DAE, and in a seedling control. Numbers on the right indicate number of amplification cycles. ACTIN11 serves as expression control.



S4 Fig. Alexander and DAPI staining reveal different pollen phenotypes in tun and evn mutant pollen grains.

(A–C) Alexander staining of mature qrt/qrt (A), tun-1/TUN;qrt/qrt (B), and evn-1/EVN;qrt/qrt pollen tetrads (C). (D–F) DAPI staining of DNA in mature qrt/qrt control (D), tun-1/TUN;qrt/qrt (E), and evn-1/EVN;qrt/qrt pollen tetrads (F). (G) DAPI staining of DNA in stage four (bicellular and early tricellular pollen), stage three (tricellular pollen), and stage two (late tricellular and early mature pollen) evn-1/EVN;qrt/qrt mutant tetrads. Scale bars: 20 μm.



S5 Fig. Reciprocal crosses reveal that the PT overgrowth phenotype is due to a female gametophytic defect.

(A–D) Aniline Blue staining of callose in PT and ovule cell walls 2 DAP. (A) Col-0 ovule pollinated with tun-1/TUN pollen. (B) tun-1 mutant ovule pollinated with Col-0 pollen. (C) Col-0 ovule pollinated with evn-1/EVN pollen. (D) evn-1 mutant ovule pollinated with Col-0 pollen. Asterisks indicate PT overgrowth phenotype. Scale bars: 20 μm.



S6 Fig. The causative EMS mutation in evn-1 localizes to the lower arm of chromosome III and disrupts gene At3g45040.

Ratios of heterozygous SNPs plotted against their chromosomal position. The red dashed line indicates the ratio at 0.5, where the causative SNP is expected. The green dashed line marks the ratio at 0.25, where the unlinked SNPs should locate. The red box indicates the linked and selected region on the lower arm of chromosome III around At3g45040. Grey boxes mark centromeric regions with poor mapping quality. Arrow indicates the causative SNP with a segregation ratio of 0.5 in a pool of mutant individuals. The segregation ratio of the evn-1 allele was as expected due to the high sequence coverage of 130 reads.



S7 Fig. The causative EMS mutation in evn-2 localizes to the lower arm of chromosome III and disrupts gene At3g45040.

Ratios of heterozygous SNPs plotted against their chromosomal position. The red dashed line indicates the ratio at 0.5, where the causative SNP is expected. The green dashed line marks the ratio at 0.25, where the unlinked SNPs should locate. The red box indicates the linked and selected region on the lower arm of chromosome III around At3g45040. Grey boxes mark centromeric regions with poor mapping quality. Arrow indicates the causative SNP with a segregation ratio of 0.3 in a pool of mutant individuals. The segregation ratio of the evn-2 alleles was lower than expected because of poor sequence coverage (see S1 Text).



S8 Fig. TUN-GFP and EVN-GFP translational fusions locate to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).

(A–E) Confocal microscope analysis of fluorescent fusion proteins. (A–C) pTUN::TUN-GFP expression in the female gametophyte (A) and the synergids (B) 2 DAE, and in a PT (C). (D) p35S::TUN-GFP (left panel) and p35S::ER-rk (middle panel) in transiently transformed onion epidermis cell, merged channels (right panel). (E) p35S::EVN-GFP (left panel) and p35S::ER-rk (middle panel) in transiently transformed tobacco epidermis cells, merged channels (right panel).



S9 Fig. TUN(RNAi) and EVN(RNAi) lines show reduced gene expression.

(A) qRT-PCR expression analysis of TUN in four independent RNAi lines. The corresponding number of dwarfed individuals per line (16 plants) is indicated below. (B) qRT-PCR expression analysis of EVN in four independent RNAi lines.



S10 Fig. FER-GFP in RNAi(TUN) lines is not completely deglycosylated.

Western blot analysis of FER-GFP protein from control and TUN(RNAi) seedlings using an antibody against GFP. Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (bottom) serves as control for loaded protein amounts. Asterisk marks completely N-deglycosylated FER-GFP after treatment of the protein extract with the deglycosylase EndoH.



S11 Fig. FER-GFP, NTA-GFP, and LRE-Citrine reporters do not differ between wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN pistils.

(A) Quantification of the localization of a homozygous FER-GFP reporter in wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN ovules (pistils 2 DAE). Note: Only fluorescent ovules were counted. (B) Quantification of the localization of a hemizygous NTA-GFP reporter in wild-type, tun-2/TUN, and evn-3/EVN ovules (pistils 2 DAE). Note: Not all ovules display reporter expression. (C) Quantification of the localization of a homozygous LRE-Citrine reporter in wild-type and evn-3/EVN ovules (pistils 2 DAE).



S12 Fig. Eeyarestatin I treatment of tun-2/TUN pollen results in partial ANX1-YFP fluorescence recovery.

Relative ANX1-YFP protein abundance in tun-2/TUN pollen after treatment with different concentrations of the ERAD inhibitor EerI. Counted pollen grains: 5 μM: n = 76; 10 μM: n = 222; 15 μM: n = 160; 20 μM: n = 265; 30 μM: n = 147; 50 μM: n = 256.



S13 Fig. Surveyor nuclease digest of sequenced samples of evn-1 and evn-2.

The SNP region of the At3g45040 gene was amplified from each of the 94 and 60 DNA samples that had been pooled for sequencing from evn-1 and evn-2, respectively, and two Col-0 controls. PCR products were digested with the SURVEYOR nuclease, cleaving single base pair mismatches in heteroduplex DNA [64]. In evn-1, the undigested wild-type band is 1,000 bp, whereas any sample containing the SNP displays an undigested band at 1,000 bp and two digestion products at around 800 bp and 200 bp. Individuals six and seven have a wild-type band only, and were shown to be sampling mistakes. In evn-2, the undigested wild-type band is 900 bp, whereas any sample containing the SNP displays an undigested band at 900 bp and two digestion products at around 500 bp and 400 bp. Results for tun-1 were published previously [28].



S1 Table. SNP data of the resequenced, EMS-mutagenized genome of evn-1/EVN.

All data presented has been obtained using the DiBayes algorithm for SNP calling with the highest stringency settings [28].



S2 Table. SNP data of the resequenced, EMS-mutagenized genome of evn-2/EVN.

All data presented has been obtained using the DiBayes algorithm for SNP calling with the highest stringency settings [28].



S3 Table. Primers to amplify evn2 linked genes carrying a non-causative EMS SNP for SURVEYOR analysis.

SNP containing regions of 14 genes were amplified. The segregation ratio of the SNP by SRM is indicated in brackets.



S1 Data. Quantitative observations for S2C Fig, S9 Fig, S11 Fig and S12 Fig



S1 Text. Supporting protocols.




We thank Michael T. Raissig for critically reading the manuscript, Jeff Harper for seeds Markus Aebi for helpful discussions, Valeria Gagliardini for experimental help during the revision, Christof Eichenberger, Arturo Bolaños, Valeria Gagliardini, Daniela Guthörl, and Peter Kopf for general lab support, and Christian Frei and Karl Huwiler for greenhouse maintenance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HL SAK UG. Performed the experiments: HL LMM HSA. Analyzed the data: HL LMM SAK ABD UG. Wrote the paper: HL UG. Initiated and supervised the project: UG.


  1. 1. Dresselhaus T, Franklin-Tong N (2013) Male-female crosstalk during pollen germination, tube growth and guidance, and double fertilization. Mol Plant 6: 1018–1036. doi: 10.1093/mp/sst061. pmid:23571489
  2. 2. Palanivelu R, Brass L, Edlund AF, Preuss D (2003) Pollen tube growth and guidance is regulated by POP2, an Arabidopsis gene that controls GABA levels. Cell 114: 47–59. pmid:12859897 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00479-3
  3. 3. Prado AM, Colaco R, Moreno N, Silva AC, Feijo JA (2008) Targeting of pollen tubes to ovules is dependent on nitric oxide (NO) signaling. Mol Plant 1: 703–714. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssn034. pmid:19825574
  4. 4. Okuda S, Tsutsui H, Shiina K, Sprunck S, Takeuchi H (2009) Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature 458: 357–361. doi: 10.1038/nature07882. pmid:19295610
  5. 5. Kanaoka MM, Kawano N, Matsubara Y, Susaki D, Okuda S, et al. (2011) Identification and characterization of TcCRP1, a pollen tube attractant from Torenia concolor. Ann Bot 108: 739–747. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr111. pmid:21546430
  6. 6. Takeuchi H, Higashiyama T (2012) A species-specific cluster of defensin-like genes encodes diffusible pollen tube attractants in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol 10: e1001449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001449. pmid:23271953
  7. 7. Liu J, Zhong S, Guo X, Hao L, Wei X, et al. (2013) Membrane-bound RLCKs LIP1 and LIP2 are essential male factors controlling male-female attraction in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 23: 993–998. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.043. pmid:23684977
  8. 8. Leshem Y, Johnson C, Sundaresan V (2013) Pollen tube entry into the synergid cell of Arabidopsis is observed at a site distinct from the filiform apparatus. Plant Reprod 26: 93–99. doi: 10.1007/s00497-013-0211-1. pmid:23686222
  9. 9. Ngo QA, Vogler H, Lituiev DS, Nestorova A, Grossniklaus U (2014) A calcium dialog mediated by the FERONIA signal transduction pathway controls plant sperm delivery. Dev Cell 29: 491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.008. pmid:24814317
  10. 10. Huck N, Moore JM, Federer M, Grossniklaus U (2003) The Arabidopsis mutant feronia disrupts the female gametophytic control of pollen tube reception. Development 130: 2149–2159. pmid:12668629 doi: 10.1242/dev.00458
  11. 11. Lindner H, Müller LM, Boisson-Dernier A, Grossniklaus U (2012) CrRLK1L receptor-like kinases: not just another brick in the wall. Curr Opin Plant Biol 15: 659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.07.003. pmid:22884521
  12. 12. Escobar-Restrepo JM, Huck N, Kessler S, Gagliardini V, Gheyselinck J, et al. (2007) The FERONIA receptor-like kinase mediates male-female interactions during pollen tube reception. Science 317: 656–660. pmid:17673660 doi: 10.1126/science.1143562
  13. 13. Rotman N, Rozier F, Boavida L, Dumas C, Berger F, et al. (2003) Female control of male gamete delivery during fertilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 13: 432–436. pmid:12620194 doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00093-9
  14. 14. Boisson-Dernier A, Roy S, Kritsas K, Grobei MA, Jaciubek M, et al. (2009) Disruption of the pollen-expressed FERONIA homologs ANXUR1 and ANXUR2 triggers pollen tube discharge. Development 136: 3279–3288. doi: 10.1242/dev.040071. pmid:19736323
  15. 15. Miyazaki S, Murata T, Sakurai-Ozato N, Kubo M, Demura T, et al. (2009) ANXUR1 and 2, sister genes to FERONIA/SIRENE, are male factors for coordinated fertilization. Curr Biol 19: 1327–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.064. pmid:19646876
  16. 16. Boisson-Dernier A, Lituiev DS, Nestorova A, Franck CM, Thirugnanarajah S, et al. (2013) ANXUR receptor-like kinases coordinate cell wall integrity with growth at the pollen tube tip via NADPH oxidases. PLoS Biol 11: e1001719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001719. pmid:24302886
  17. 17. Duan Q, Kita D, Johnson EA, Aggarwal M, Gates L, et al. (2014) Reactive oxygen species mediate pollen tube rupture to release sperm for fertilization in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 5: 3129. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4129. pmid:24451849
  18. 18. Haruta M, Sabat G, Stecker K, Minkoff BB, Sussman MR (2014) A peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase regulate plant cell expansion. Science 343: 408–411. doi: 10.1126/science.1244454. pmid:24458638
  19. 19. Capron A, Gourgues M, Neiva LS, Faure JE, Berger F, et al. (2008) Maternal control of male-gamete delivery in Arabidopsis involves a putative GPI-anchored protein encoded by the LORELEI gene. Plant Cell 20: 3038–3049. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.061713. pmid:19028964
  20. 20. Kessler SA, Shimosato-Asano H, Keinath NF, Wuest SE, Ingram G, et al. (2010) Conserved molecular components for pollen tube reception and fungal invasion. Science 330: 968–971. doi: 10.1126/science.1195211. pmid:21071669
  21. 21. Boisson-Dernier A, Frietsch S, Kim T-H, Dizon MB, Schroeder JI (2008) The peroxin loss-of-function mutation abstinence by mutual consent disrupts male-female gametophyte recognition. Curr Biol 18: 63–68. pmid:18160292 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.067
  22. 22. Leydon AR, Beale KM, Woroniecka K, Castner E, Chen J, et al. (2013) Three MYB transcription factors control pollen tube differentiation required for sperm release. Curr Biol 23: 1209–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.021. pmid:23791732
  23. 23. Liang Y, Tan Z-M, Zhu L, Niu Q-K, Zhou J-J, et al. (2013) MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120 function as male factors that control pollen tube-synergid interaction in Arabidopsis thaliana fertilization. PLoS Genet 9: e1003933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003933. pmid:24278028
  24. 24. Gerhard E (1847) Über die Gottheiten der Etrusker. Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
  25. 25. Nishimura MT, Stein M, Hou B-H, Vogel JP, Edwards H, et al. (2003) Loss of a callose synthase results in salicylic acid-dependent disease resistance. Science 301: 969–972. pmid:12920300 doi: 10.1126/science.1086716
  26. 26. Preuss D, Rhee SY, Davis RW (1994) Tetrad analysis possible in Arabidopsis with mutation of the QUARTET (QRT) genes. Science 264: 1458–1460. pmid:8197459 doi: 10.1126/science.8197459
  27. 27. Rhee SY, Osborne E, Poindexter PD, Somerville CR (2003) Microspore separation in the quartet 3 mutants of Arabidopsis is impaired by a defect in a developmentally regulated polygalacturonase required for pollen mother cell wall degradation. Plant Physiol 133: 1170–1180. pmid:14551328 doi: 10.1104/pp.103.028266
  28. 28. Lindner H, Raissig MT, Sailer C, Shimosato-Asano H, Bruggmann R, et al. (2012) SNP-Ratio Mapping (SRM): Identifying lethal alleles and mutations in complex genetic backgrounds by next-generation sequencing. Genetics 191: 1381–1386. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.141341. pmid:22649081
  29. 29. Kanehara K, Cho Y, Lin Y-C, Chen C-E, Yu C-Y, et al. (2015) Arabidopsis DOK1 encodes a functional dolichol kinase involved in reproduction. Plant J 81: 292–303. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12727. pmid:25406445
  30. 30. Aebi M (2013) N-linked protein glycosylation in the ER. BBA—Molecular Cell Research 1833: 2430–2437. pmid:23583305 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.001
  31. 31. Farid A, Malinovsky FG, Veit C, Schoberer J, Zipfel C, et al. (2013) Specialized roles of the conserved subunit OST3/6 of the oligosaccharyltransferase complex in innate immunity and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol 162: 24–38. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.215509. pmid:23493405
  32. 32. Guo H, Li L, Ye H, Yu X, Algreen A, et al. (2009) Three related receptor-like kinases are required for optimal cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 7648–7653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812346106. pmid:19383785
  33. 33. Helenius A, Aebi M (2001) Intracellular functions of N-linked glycans. Science 291: 2364–2369. pmid:11269317 doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2364
  34. 34. Haweker H, Rips S, Koiwa H, Salomon S, Saijo Y, et al. (2010) Pattern recognition receptors require N-glycosylation to mediate plant immunity. J Biol Chem 285: 4629–4636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.063073. pmid:20007973
  35. 35. Heller L, Orlean P, Adair WL (1992) Saccharomyces cerevisiae sec59 cells are deficient in dolichol kinase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 7013–7016. pmid:1323123 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7013
  36. 36. Griesbeck O, Baird GS, Campbell RE, Zacharias DA, Tsien RY (2001) Reducing the environmental sensitivity of yellow fluorescent protein. Mechanism and applications. J Biol Chem 276: 29188–29194. pmid:11387331 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m102815200
  37. 37. Hüttner S, Strasser R (2012) Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of glycoproteins in plants. Front Plant Sci 3: 67. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00067. pmid:22645596
  38. 38. Tokunaga F, Brostrom C, Koide T, Arvan P (2000) Endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation of misfolded N-linked glycoproteins is suppressed upon inhibition of ER mannosidase I. J Biol Chem 275: 40757–40764. pmid:10984471 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m001073200
  39. 39. Wang Q, Shinkre BA, Lee J, Weniger MA, Liu Y, et al. (2010) The ERAD inhibitor Eeyarestatin I is a bifunctional compound with a membrane-binding domain and a p97/VCP inhibitory group. PLoS ONE 5:e15479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015479. pmid:21124757
  40. 40. Helenius A, Aebi M (2004) Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 1019–1049. pmid:15189166 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073752
  41. 41. Bause E (1983) Structural requirements of N-glycosylation of proteins. Studies with proline peptides as conformational probes. Biochem J 209: 331–336. pmid:6847620
  42. 42. Ferro-Novick S, Novick P, Field C, Schekman R (1984) Yeast secretory mutants that block the formation of active cell surface enzymes. J Cell Biol 98: 35–43. pmid:6368571 doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.35
  43. 43. Allen CM, Kalin JR, Sack J, Verizzo D (1978) CTP-dependent dolichol phosphorylation by mammalian cell homogenates. Biochemistry 17: 5020–5026. pmid:214107 doi: 10.1021/bi00616a025
  44. 44. Rush JS, Cho SK, Jiang S, Hofmann SL, Waechter CJ (2002) Identification and characterization of a cDNA encoding a dolichyl pyrophosphate phosphatase located in the endoplasmic reticulum of mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 277: 45226–45234. pmid:12198133 doi: 10.1074/jbc.m207076200
  45. 45. Fernandez F, Shridas P, Jiang S, Aebi M, Waechter CJ (2002) Expression and characterization of a human cDNA that complements the temperature-sensitive defect in dolichol kinase activity in the yeast sec59-1 mutant: the enzymatic phosphorylation of dolichol and diacylglycerol are catalyzed by separate CTP-mediated kinase activities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Glycobiology 12: 555–562. pmid:12213788 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwf068
  46. 46. Bernstein M, Kepes F, Schekman R (1989) Sec59 encodes a membrane protein required for core glycosylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 9: 1191–1199. pmid:2657387
  47. 47. Kranz C, Jungeblut C, Denecke J, Erlekotte A, Sohlbach C, et al. (2007) A defect in dolichol phosphate biosynthesis causes a new inherited disorder with death in early infancy. Am J Hum Genet 80: 433–440. pmid:17273964 doi: 10.1086/512130
  48. 48. Huffaker TC, Robbins PW (1982) Temperature-sensitive yeast mutants deficient in asparagine-linked glycosylation. J Biol Chem 257: 3203–3210. pmid:7037780
  49. 49. Couto JR, Huffaker TC, Robbins PW (1984) Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of a yeast mannosyltransferase from the asparagine-linked glycosylation pathway. J Biol Chem 259: 378–382. pmid:6368538
  50. 50. Gao XD, Nishikawa A, Dean N (2004) Physical interactions between the Alg1, Alg2, and Alg11 mannosyltransferases of the endoplasmic reticulum. Glycobiology 14: 559–570. pmid:15044395 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh072
  51. 51. Albright CF, Robbins RW (1990) The sequence and transcript heterogeneity of the yeast gene ALG1, an essential mannosyltransferase involved in N-glycosylation. J Biol Chem 265: 7042–7049. pmid:2182636
  52. 52. Pattison RJ, Amtmann A (2009) N-glycan production in the endoplasmic reticulum of plants. Trends Plant Sci 14: 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.008. pmid:19162525
  53. 53. Schallus T, Jaeckh C, Fehér K, Palma AS, Liu Y, et al. (2008) Malectin: a novel carbohydrate-binding protein of the endoplasmic reticulum and a candidate player in the early steps of protein N-glycosylation. Mol Biol Cell 19: 3404–3414. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E08-04-0354. pmid:18524852
  54. 54. Galli C, Bernasconi R, Soldà T, Calanca V, Molinari M (2011) Malectin participates in a backup glycoprotein quality control pathway in the mammalian ER. PLoS ONE 6: e16304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016304. pmid:21298103
  55. 55. Clark GF (2010) The mammalian zona pellucida: a matrix that mediates both gamete binding and immune recognition? Syst Biol Reprod Med 56: 349–364. doi: 10.3109/19396360903524812. pmid:20662591
  56. 56. Wassarman PM, Litscher ES (2008) Mammalian fertilization: the egg's multifunctional zona pellucida. Int J Dev Biol 52: 665–676. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072524pw. pmid:18649280
  57. 57. Clark GF (2011) Molecular models for mouse sperm-oocyte binding. Glycobiology 21: 3–5. pmid:21188842 doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwq159
  58. 58. Li J, Chory J (1997) A putative leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase involved in brassinosteroid signal transduction. Cell 90: 929–938. pmid:9298904 doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80357-8
  59. 59. Hong Z, Jin H, Tzfira T, Li J (2008) Multiple mechanism-mediated retention of a defective brassinosteroid receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20: 3418–3429. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.061879. pmid:19060110
  60. 60. Hong Z, Jin H, Fitchette AC, Xia Y, Monk AM (2009) Mutations of an α1, 6 mannosyltransferase inhibit endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation of defective brassinosteroid receptors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21: 3792–3802. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.070284. pmid:20023196
  61. 61. Li J, Zhao-Hui C, Batoux M, Nekrasov V, Roux M, et al. (2009) Specific ER quality control components required for biogenesis of the plant innate immune receptor EFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15973–15978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905532106. pmid:19717464
  62. 62. Raissig MT, Bemer M, Baroux C, Grossniklaus U (2013) Genomic imprinting in the Arabidopsis embryo is partly regulated by PRC2. PLoS Genet 9: e1003862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003862. pmid:24339783
  63. 63. Groß-Hardt R, Kägi C, Baumann N, Moore JM, Baskar R, et al. (2007) LACHESIS restricts gametic cell fate in the female gametophyte of Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol 5: e47. pmid:17326723 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050047
  64. 64. Till BJ, Burtner C, Comai L, Henikoff S (2004) Mismatch cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 2632–2641. pmid:15141034 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh599