@article{10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700, doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700}, author = {Blomqvist, Linus AND Brook, Barry W. AND Ellis, Erle C. AND Kareiva, Peter M. AND Nordhaus, Ted AND Shellenberger, Michael}, journal = {PLOS Biology}, publisher = {Public Library of Science}, title = {Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints}, year = {2013}, month = {11}, volume = {11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700}, pages = {1-6}, abstract = {The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective.}, number = {11}, }